Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Sustainability of Projects Based on Dynamic Time Management Using Petri Nets
Previous Article in Journal
NutriRadar: A Mobile Application for the Digital Automation of Childhood Nutritional Classification Based on WHO Standards in the Peruvian Amazon
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Does Digital Transformation Catalyze New-Quality Productivity? Unraveling the Path Through Green Innovation and the Role of Digital Financial Inclusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Green Product and Process Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review

1
College of Economics and Management, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2
International College, Krirk University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
3
School of Economics and Management, Dali University, Dali 671000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1640; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031640 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 December 2025 / Revised: 20 January 2026 / Accepted: 27 January 2026 / Published: 5 February 2026

Abstract

As organizations strive to balance environmental stewardship with economic competitiveness, understanding the performance implications of Green Innovation (GI) has become increasingly important. Although the nexus between Green Product Innovation (GPI), Green Process Innovation (GPrI), and organizational outcomes has attracted sustained scholarly attention, empirical evidence remains inconclusive. To reconcile these inconsistencies and delineate boundary conditions, this study synthesizes data from 48 empirical investigations (2012–2025) via a random-effects meta-analysis with the Hartung–Knapp adjustment and trim-and-fill procedures to strengthen statistical inference. Results reveal significant small-to-moderate positive associations between GI and environmental (r = 0.172), financial (r = 0.191), and innovation performance (r = 0.143). Notably, moderator analyses demonstrate a synergy premium, where Integrated GI measures significantly outperform isolated GPI or GPrI approaches (r = 0.353). Substantial heterogeneity exists (I2 = 91.2%), which is significantly moderated by innovation type, industry pollution intensity, geographic region, and research design. Our findings reinforce the Natural-Resource-Based View (NRBV) and the Dynamic Capabilities framework, highlighting that strategic returns depend on asset orchestration and contextual factors. We conclude that firms should adopt a holistic approach, integrating both product and process innovations to enhance competitive advantage in an incremental and context-contingent manner, while interpreting innovation-performance results cautiously given the limited evidence base.
Keywords: green innovation; green product and process innovation; corporate performance; environmental and financial performance; meta-analysis; natural-resource-based view (NRBV); ESG; sustainable innovation green innovation; green product and process innovation; corporate performance; environmental and financial performance; meta-analysis; natural-resource-based view (NRBV); ESG; sustainable innovation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, F.; Li, M.; Xie, X.; He, L. Green Product and Process Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sustainability 2026, 18, 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031640

AMA Style

Zhao F, Li M, Xie X, He L. Green Product and Process Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sustainability. 2026; 18(3):1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Fengyu, Menghan Li, Xiaowen Xie, and Lei He. 2026. "Green Product and Process Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review" Sustainability 18, no. 3: 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031640

APA Style

Zhao, F., Li, M., Xie, X., & He, L. (2026). Green Product and Process Innovation and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sustainability, 18(3), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031640

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop