Abstract
The increasing adoption of highly glazed façades in contemporary office building has improved daylight penetration but has also intensified glare risk and sunlight overexposure in Mediterranean climates, with direct implications for occupant visual comfort and environmental sustainability. While daylight optimization has been widely discussed, fewer studies have examined how façade morphology systematically shapes the balance between daylight sufficiency and visual comfort in Mediterranean island contexts. This study investigates the relationship between façade configuration, daylight availability, and glare performance in office buildings in Northern Cyprus using climate-based daylight simulation. Six façade morphologies are evaluated across a range of window-to-wall ratios (WWR) using EN 17037-aligned criteria and metrics, including spatial daylight autonomy (sDA), annual sunlight exposure (ASE), and daylight glare probability (DGP). Usable daylight is not simply a function of more glass. As WWR increases, fully glazed façades in Mediterranean conditions tend to admit excessive direct sun and intensify glare, so daylight becomes less workable even when illuminance is high. Instead, hybrid and adaptive morphologies that control lighting through a combined approach of shade, diffusion, and redirection provide the most dependable performance, reducing both overexposure and glare while ensuring sufficient daylight sufficiency. The findings also indicate a distinct turning point at about 50–55% WWR, beyond which performance is mostly dependent on the façade’s ability to modulate its morphology and further glass offers minimal advantage. Based on this, the article suggests a contextual framework to encourage façade options for Mediterranean office environments that are more sustainable, aesthetically pleasing, and climate-responsive.