Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Environmental Education on Higher Education Students’ Ecological Behavior: A Moderated Chain Mediation Model
Previous Article in Journal
Towards Sustainable Flood Management: Diagnosing River–Lake Interactions and Proposing a Separation Scheme for the Huaihe River–Hongze Lake System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Impact of Urban–Rural Integrated Development on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China

College of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(14), 7340; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147340 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 May 2026 / Revised: 14 July 2026 / Accepted: 16 July 2026 / Published: 17 July 2026

Abstract

Urban–rural integration, as a pivotal strategy for reshaping the relationship between cities and the countryside and promoting balanced regional development in the current era, carries considerable weight for the green transition of agricultural systems. This study utilizes panel data from 31 Chinese provincial units over the 2011–2023 period to construct a four-dimensional (economic, social, spatial, and ecological) assessment framework for urban–rural integration. It then applies the SBM-GML model to estimate agricultural green total factor productivity and systematically investigates the impact and underlying mechanisms of integration on that productivity. The principal findings are as follows: (1) Urban–rural integration significantly boosts agricultural green total factor productivity, and this outcome remains robust after a variety of sensitivity checks and corrections for potential endogeneity. (2) Mechanism tests further reveal that the primary conduits through which such integration raises AGTFP are the upgrading of human capital and the proliferation of agricultural socialized services. (3) Analysis of moderating effects indicates that both innovation in agricultural science and technology and government fiscal support for farming positively reinforce the facilitative impact of urban–rural integration on agricultural green total factor productivity. (4) Results from heterogeneity analysis suggest that the green productivity effect of such integration is strongest in major grain-producing areas, weaker in major grain-selling areas, and not statistically detectable in grain production–marketing balance regions.
Keywords: urban–rural integrated development; agricultural green total factor productivity; SBM-GML model; human capital; agricultural socialized services urban–rural integrated development; agricultural green total factor productivity; SBM-GML model; human capital; agricultural socialized services

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Jiang, H.-M. The Impact of Urban–Rural Integrated Development on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 2026, 18, 7340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147340

AMA Style

Liu Z, Jiang H-M. The Impact of Urban–Rural Integrated Development on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2026; 18(14):7340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhao, and Hui-Ming Jiang. 2026. "The Impact of Urban–Rural Integrated Development on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China" Sustainability 18, no. 14: 7340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147340

APA Style

Liu, Z., & Jiang, H.-M. (2026). The Impact of Urban–Rural Integrated Development on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 18(14), 7340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop