Development and Evaluation of Corn Starch Films Incorporating Red Cabbage Extract as Non-Contact Freshness Indicators for Minced Chicken
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
2.2. Preparation and Evaluation of Red Cabbage Extract
2.2.1. Extraction of Anthocyanins
2.2.2. Determination of Antioxidant Activity (AA) of Red Cabbage Extract
2.2.3. Determination of Total Phenolic Content in Red Cabbage Extract
2.2.4. Evaluation of Red Cabbage Extract Color Change as a Function of pH
2.3. Preparation of Film Spoilage Indicators
2.3.1. Corn Starch Films (CSFs)
2.3.2. Corn Starch Films with an Integrated Red Cabbage Extract Indicator
2.3.3. Corn Starch Films with an Integrated Methyl Red Indicator
2.4. Film Measurements
2.4.1. Film Thickness
2.4.2. Mechanical Properties
2.4.3. Moisture Content and Water Solubility of Films
2.4.4. Determination of Antioxidant Activity of Films
2.4.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Content in Films
2.5. Minced Chicken Meat Samples Packaging Preparation
2.6. Microbiological Analysis of Packaged Meat Samples
2.7. Physicochemical Analysis of Packaged Meat Samples
2.7.1. Determination of pH
2.7.2. Determination of TVB-N
2.7.3. Semi-Quantification of Volatile Compounds of Packaged Meat Samples
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization of RCE
3.1.1. Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content in RCE
3.1.2. Evaluation of RCE Color Changes at Different pH Values
3.2. Characterization of the Prepared Film Spoilage Indicators
3.2.1. Visual Observation of the Films
3.2.2. Color Evaluation of Films Under Conditions of Different pH
3.2.3. Film Thickness
3.2.4. Mechanical Properties
3.2.5. Moisture Content (MC) and Water Solubility (WS)
3.2.6. Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolic Content in Films
3.3. Microbiological and Physicochemical Changes in Minced Chicken During Storage
3.3.1. Microbiological Analyses
3.3.2. Physicochemical Analyses (pH, TVB-N) of Minced Chicken Meat
3.3.3. Volatile Compound Analysis of Minced Chicken Meat
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Müller, P.; Schmid, M. Intelligent Packaging in the Food Sector: A Brief Overview. Foods 2019, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ghaani, M.; Cozzolino, C.A.; Castelli, G.; Farris, S. An Overview of the Intelligent Packaging Technologies in the Food Sector. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vilela, C.; Kurek, M.; Hayouka, Z.; Röcker, B.; Yildirim, S.; Antunes, M.D.C.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Pettersen, M.K.; Freire, C.S.R. A Concise Guide to Active Agents for Active Food Packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kalpana, S.; Priyadarshini, S.R.; Maria Leena, M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Intelligent Packaging: Trends and Applications in Food Systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food and Repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC; European Parliament and of the Council: Brussels, Belgium, 2004; Volume 338. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 of 22 December 2006 on Good Manufacturing Practice for Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food (Text with EEA Relevance); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2006; Volume 384. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on Plastic Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food Text with EEA Relevance; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011; Volume 012. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 450/2009 of 29 May 2009 on Active and Intelligent Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food (Text with EEA Relevance); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2009; Volume 135. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, D.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Bhandari, B. Freshness Monitoring Technology of Fish Products in Intelligent Packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1279–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ghareaghajlou, N.; Hallaj-Nezhadi, S.; Ghasempour, Z. Red Cabbage Anthocyanins: Stability, Extraction, Biological Activities and Applications in Food Systems. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ma, Q.; Lu, X.; Wang, W.; Hubbe, M.A.; Liu, Y.; Mu, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Rojas, O.J. Recent Developments in Colorimetric and Optical Indicators Stimulated by Volatile Base Nitrogen to Monitor Seafood Freshness. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dehghani, S.; Hosseini, S.V.; Regenstein, J.M. Edible Films and Coatings in Seafood Preservation: A Review. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mohamed, S.A.A.; El-Sakhawy, M.; El-Sakhawy, M.A.-M. Polysaccharides, Protein and Lipid -Based Natural Edible Films in Food Packaging: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Umaraw, P.; Verma, A.K. Comprehensive Review on Application of Edible Film on Meat and Meat Products: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1270–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hammam, A.R.A. Technological, Applications, and Characteristics of Edible Films and Coatings: A Review. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kumar, L.; Ramakanth, D.; Akhila, K.; Gaikwad, K.K. Edible Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 875–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Matloob, A.; Ayub, H.; Mohsin, M.; Ambreen, S.; Khan, F.A.; Oranab, S.; Rahim, M.A.; Khalid, W.; Nayik, G.A.; Ramniwas, S.; et al. A Review on Edible Coatings and Films: Advances, Composition, Production Methods, and Safety Concerns. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 28932–28944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Schumann, B.; Schmid, M. Packaging Concepts for Fresh and Processed Meat—Recent Progresses. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 47, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Panou, A.; Karabagias, I.K. Biodegradable Packaging Materials for Foods Preservation: Sources, Advantages, Limitations, and Future Perspectives. Coatings 2023, 13, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, B.; Yu, B.; Yuan, C.; Guo, L.; Liu, P.; Gao, W.; Li, D.; Cui, B.; Abd El-Aty, A.M. An Overview on Plasticized Biodegradable Corn Starch-Based Films: The Physicochemical Properties and Gelatinization Process. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2569–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ojogbo, E.; Ogunsona, E.O.; Mekonnen, T.H. Chemical and Physical Modifications of Starch for Renewable Polymeric Materials. Mater. Today Sustain. 2020, 7–8, 100028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bekhit, A.E.-D.A.; Holman, B.W.B.; Giteru, S.G.; Hopkins, D.L. Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N) and Its Role in Meat Spoilage: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 280–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Papuc, C.; Goran, G.V.; Predescu, C.N.; Nicorescu, V. Mechanisms of Oxidative Processes in Meat and Toxicity Induced by Postprandial Degradation Products: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 96–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lund, M.N.; Heinonen, M.; Baron, C.P.; Estévez, M. Protein Oxidation in Muscle Foods: A Review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Paczkowski, S.; Schütz, S. Post-Mortem Volatiles of Vertebrate Tissue. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 917–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Prietto, L.; Mirapalhete, T.C.; Pinto, V.Z.; Hoffmann, J.F.; Vanier, N.L.; Lim, L.-T.; Guerra Dias, A.R.; da Rosa Zavareze, E. pH-Sensitive Films Containing Anthocyanins Extracted from Black Bean Seed Coat and Red Cabbage. LWT 2017, 80, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000 Laying down the Measures Necessary for the Adoption of an Evaluation Programme in Application of Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA Relevance); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2000; Volume 180. [Google Scholar]
- Demirdöven, A.; Özdoğan, K.; Erdoğan-Tokatlı, K. Extraction of Anthocyanins from Red Cabbage by Ultrasonic and Conventional Methods: Optimization and Evaluation. J. Food Biochem. 2015, 39, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ademoyegun, O.T.; Akin-Idowu, P.E.; Ibitoye, D.O.; Adewuyi, G.O. Phenolic Contents and Free Radical Scavenging Activity in Some Leafy Vegetables. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2013, 19, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- do Nascimento Alves, R.; Lorranne Santos Lima, T.; da Silva Chaves, K.; de Albuquerque Meireles, B.R.L. Biodegradable Films with Brassica Oleracea Capitata Extract as a Quality Indicator in Sheep Meat. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e14997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Z.; Tang, H.; Cai, K.; Liang, R.; Tong, L.; Ou, C. A Novel Indicator Based on Polyacrylamide Hydrogel and Bromocresol Green for Monitoring the Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen of Fish. Foods 2023, 12, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Lu, Y.; Li, Z.; An, X.; Gao, Z.; Tian, S. Preparation and Performance Characterization of a Composite Film Based on Corn Starch, κ-Carrageenan, and Ethanol Extract of Onion Skin. Polymers 2022, 14, 2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- ICMSF; Christian, J.H.B.; Roberts, T.A. Microorganisms in Foods 2. Sampling for Microbiological Analysis: Principles and Specific Applications, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK; University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1986; ISBN 978-0-632-01567-2. [Google Scholar]
- Assanti, E.; Karabagias, V.K.; Karabagias, I.K.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M.G. Shelf Life Evaluation of Fresh Chicken Burgers Based on the Combination of Chitosan Dip and Vacuum Packaging under Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 870–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sun, Y.; Fu, M.; Li, Z.; Peng, X. Evaluation of Freshness in Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds Released from Pork by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Food Anal. Methods 2018, 11, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0; IBM Corp.: Armonk, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Leja, M.; Kamińska, I.; Kołton, A. Phenolic Compounds as the Major Antioxidants in Red Cabbage. Folia Hortic. 2010, 22, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chun, O.K.; Smith, N.; Sakagawa, A.; Lee, C.Y. Antioxidant Properties of Raw and Processed Cabbages. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 55, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Abedi-Firoozjah, R.; Yousefi, S.; Heydari, M.; Seyedfatehi, F.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Mohammadi, R.; Rouhi, M.; Garavand, F. Application of Red Cabbage Anthocyanins as pH-Sensitive Pigments in Smart Food Packaging and Sensors. Polymers 2022, 14, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ghasemlou, M.; Aliheidari, N.; Fahmi, R.; Shojaee-Aliabadi, S.; Keshavarz, B.; Cran, M.J.; Khaksar, R. Physical, Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Corn Starch Films Incorporated with Plant Essential Oils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cheng, M.; Yan, X.; Cui, Y.; Han, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X. Characterization and Release Kinetics Study of Active Packaging Films Based on Modified Starch and Red Cabbage Anthocyanin Extract. Polymers 2022, 14, 1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Musso, Y.S.; Salgado, P.R.; Mauri, A.N. Smart Gelatin Films Prepared Using Red Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L.) Extracts as Solvent. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ribeiro Sanches, M.A.; Camelo-Silva, C.; da Silva Carvalho, C.; Rafael de Mello, J.; Barroso, N.G.; Lopes da Silva Barros, E.; Silva, P.P.; Pertuzatti, P.B. Active Packaging with Starch, Red Cabbage Extract and Sweet Whey: Characterization and Application in Meat. LWT 2021, 135, 110275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs (Text with EEA Relevance); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2005; Volume 338. [Google Scholar]
- Balamatsia, C.C.; Patsias, A.; Kontominas, M.G.; Savvaidis, I.N. Possible Role of Volatile Amines as Quality-Indicating Metabolites in Modified Atmosphere-Packaged Chicken Fillets: Correlation with Microbiological and Sensory Attributes. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1622–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chouliara, E.; Karatapanis, A.; Savvaidis, I.N.; Kontominas, M.G. Combined Effect of Oregano Essential Oil and Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Shelf-Life Extension of Fresh Chicken Breast Meat, Stored at 4 °C. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Institute of Medicine (US); National Research Council (US). Committee on the Review of the Use of Scientific Criteria and Performance Standards for Safe Food. In Scientific Criteria to Ensure Safe Food; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0-309-08928-9. [Google Scholar]
- Tsafrakidou, P.; Sameli, N.; Bosnea, L.; Chorianopoulos, N.; Samelis, J. Assessment of the Spoilage Microbiota in Minced Free-Range Chicken Meat during Storage at 4 C in Retail Modified Atmosphere Packages. Food Microbiol. 2021, 99, 103822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Patsias, A.; Chouliara, I.; Badeka, A.; Savvaidis, I.N.; Kontominas, M.G. Shelf-Life of a Chilled Precooked Chicken Product Stored in Air and under Modified Atmospheres: Microbiological, Chemical, Sensory Attributes. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Iulietto, M.F.; Sechi, P.; Borgogni, E.; Cenci-Goga, B.T. Meat Spoilage: A Critical Review of a Neglected Alteration Due to Ropy Slime Producing Bacteria. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 14, 4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balamatsia, C.C.; Rogga, K.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M.G.; Savvaidis, I.N. Effect of Low-Dose Radiation on Microbiological, Chemical, and Sensory Characteristics of Chicken Meat Stored Aerobically at 4 °C. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1126–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Beauclercq, S.; Mignon-Grasteau, S.; Petit, A.; Berger, Q.; Lefèvre, A.; Métayer-Coustard, S.; Tesseraud, S.; Emond, P.; Berri, C.; Le Bihan-Duval, E. A Divergent Selection on Breast Meat Ultimate pH, a Key Factor for Chicken Meat Quality, Is Associated With Different Circulating Lipid Profiles. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 935868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hertanto, B.S.; Nurmalasari, C.D.A.; Nuhriawangsa, A.M.P.; Cahyadi, M.; Kartikasari, L.R. The Physical and Microbiological Quality of Chicken Meat in the Different Type of Enterprise Poultry Slaughterhouse: A Case Study in Karanganyar District. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 102, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silva, C.M.G.; Glória, M.B.A. Bioactive Amines in Chicken Breast and Thigh after Slaughter and during Storage at 4±1 °C and in Chicken-Based Meat Products. Food Chem. 2002, 78, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Casaburi, A.; Piombino, P.; Nychas, G.-J.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Bacterial Populations and the Volatilome Associated to Meat Spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bleicher, J.; Ebner, E.E.; Bak, K.H. Formation and Analysis of Volatile and Odor Compounds in Meat—A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 6703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]






| Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | CSF | CSF + 10%RCE | CSF + 20%RCE | CSF + 5%MRI |
| Thickness (μm) | 81.37 ± 9.10 A | 105.12 ± 7.36 B | 114.00 ± 17.41 B | 101.37 ± 13.02 B |
| Load at Break (N) | 8.9 ± 2.5 A | 8.2 ± 1.6 A | 9.7 ± 1.1 A | 14.5 ± 2.1 B |
| % Elongation at Break | 37.21 ± 7.66 B | 70.25 ± 7.12 C | 78.06 ± 5.48 C | 26.52 ± 5.06 A |
| Tensile Strength at Break (MPa) | 7.32 ± 2.06 B | 5.21 ± 0.10 A | 5.68 ± 0.66 A, B | 9.55 ± 1.35 C |
| Young’s Modulus (MPa) | 373.45 ± 75.75 B | 142.66 ± 37.44 A | 115.87± 16.23 A | 589.07 ± 92.80 C |
| Moisture Content (%) | 10.92 ± 0.52 A, B | 11.05 ± 1.25 A, B | 12.58 ± 0.22 B | 9.64 ± 0.30 A |
| Water Solubility (%) | 19.52 ± 1.51 A, B | 21.59 ± 1.03 B | 26.37 ± 1.18 C | 17.33 ± 0.65 A |
| Antioxidant Activity (%) | 5.21 ± 0.37 B | 8.08 ± 0.24 C | 8.39 ± 1.21 C | 0.10 ± 0.01 A |
| Total Phenolic Content (mg Gallic Acid/g film) | 3.68 ± 0.31 A | 4.36 ± 0.58 A, B | 5.66 ± 0.49 B, C | 5.83 ± 0.58 C |
| Storage Day | TVCs | Enterobacteriaceae | Br. thermosphacta | Pseudomonads | LAB | Yeast–Molds | pH | TVB-N (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.59 ± 0.01 A | 2.02 ± 0.09 A | 5.13 ± 0.06 A | 3.86 ± 0.07 A | 2.57 ± 0.06 A | 3.34 ± 0.12 A | 5.89 ± 0.02 A | 17.30 ± 2.97 A |
| 3 | 6.82 ± 0.01 B | 3.10 ± 0.04 B | 6.19 ± 0.12 B | 5.05 ± 0.04 B | 2.64 ± 0.02 A | 3.87 ± 0.03 B | 5.97 ± 0.01 B | 23.20 ± 1.98 B |
| 5 | 6.87 ± 0.03 B | 3.24 ± 0.07 B | 6.20 ± 0.01 B | 5.61 ± 0.01 C | 3.04 ± 0.01 B | 4.43 ± 0.05 C | 6.15 ± 0.01 C | 35.50 ± 2.97 C |
| 7 | 7.82 ± 0.05 C | 3.81 ± 0.03 C | 6.87 ± 0.02 C | 6.65 ± 0.05 D | 3.38 ± 0.03 C | 5.18 ± 0.06 D | 6.71 ± 0.03 D | 44.06 ± 2.57 D |
| Storage Day | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOCs | Rilit * | Riexp ** | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| ethanol | 482 | 495 | 72.22 ± 16.7 A | 240.97 ± 41.12 B | 279.80 ± 2.47 B | 57.47 ± 10.25 A |
| 1-propanol | 554 | 550 | - | 12.26 ± 2.99 B | 11.83 ± 0.89 B | - |
| 2-methyl-1-propanol | 609 | 619 | - | 6.22 ± 0.28 A | 45.08 ± 8.76 B | 72.43 ± 5.67 C |
| 3-methyl-1-butanol | 727 | 730 | - | 123.01 ± 4.45 B | 294.41 ± 5.76 C | 402.08 ± 9.11 D |
| 2-methyl-1-butanol | 732 | 745 | - | 29.03 ± 2.85 B | 120.70 ± 0.83 C | 137.83 ± 1.53 D |
| butanone | 583 | 599 | 37.13 ± 5.21 A | 32.86 ± 6.88 A | 55.76 ± 8.27 A | 200.57 ± 11.09 B |
| 3-hydroxy-2-butanone | 709 | 712 | - | 110.47 ± 27.15 B | 209.86 ± 15.95 C | 91.30 ± 10.51 B |
| acetone | 503 | 510 | - | - | 70.97 ± 6.18 B | 84.15 ± 5.39 B |
| 2,3-butanedione | 613 | 622 | - | - | 49.84 ± 6.61 B | 39.58 ± 0.94 B |
| 2-pentanone | 686 | 677 | - | - | 6.31 ± 0.93 B | 13.65 ± 0.74 C |
| 3-methylbutanal | 655 | 650 | - | 34.26 ± 3.78 B | 28.85 ± 0.52 B | 24.27 ± 6.45 B |
| 2-methylbutanal | 664 | 672 | - | 9.41 ± 0.84 B | 12.93 ± 0.51 B, C | 15.63 ± 2.41 C |
| ethyl acetate | 628 | 647 | - | 113.44 ± 21.02 B | 93.71 ± 6.14 B | 107.48 ± 4.90 B |
| methyl butanoate | 735 | 751 | - | 31.97 ± 4.46 B | 29.31 ± 10.06 B | 36.46 ± 2.96 B |
| ethyl butanoate | 798 | 802 | - | 16.14 ± 1.92 A | 17.98 ± 9.43 A | 13.40 ± 3.74 A |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kalyva, Z.I.; Kosma, I.S.; Badeka, A.V. Development and Evaluation of Corn Starch Films Incorporating Red Cabbage Extract as Non-Contact Freshness Indicators for Minced Chicken. Sustainability 2026, 18, 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18146928
Kalyva ZI, Kosma IS, Badeka AV. Development and Evaluation of Corn Starch Films Incorporating Red Cabbage Extract as Non-Contact Freshness Indicators for Minced Chicken. Sustainability. 2026; 18(14):6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18146928
Chicago/Turabian StyleKalyva, Zacharoula I., Ioanna S. Kosma, and Anastasia V. Badeka. 2026. "Development and Evaluation of Corn Starch Films Incorporating Red Cabbage Extract as Non-Contact Freshness Indicators for Minced Chicken" Sustainability 18, no. 14: 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18146928
APA StyleKalyva, Z. I., Kosma, I. S., & Badeka, A. V. (2026). Development and Evaluation of Corn Starch Films Incorporating Red Cabbage Extract as Non-Contact Freshness Indicators for Minced Chicken. Sustainability, 18(14), 6928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18146928

