Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Urban Accessibility and Retail Choices: Consumer Behaviour Through Discrete Choice Analysis in Southern Italy
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Environmental Quality on Quality of Life: Evidence from Developed and Developing OECD Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multiple Approaches to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Flash Flooding in the Hanefah Catchment, Central Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(12), 6080; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126080 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 April 2026 / Revised: 4 June 2026 / Accepted: 5 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026

Abstract

Worldwide, flash floods are among the most unpredictable and hazardous hydrological phenomena, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions such as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where sudden heavy rainfall follows prolonged periods of drought. This work presents an effective integrated model for flood hazard evaluation in the Hanefah Catchment, a socioeconomically vital area in the central part of Saudi Arabia that includes the capital city, Riyadh. Using high-resolution ALOS PALSAR 12.5 m Digital Elevation Model spatial data, we extracted and investigated indicative linear, areal, and relief morphometric keys of 64 sub-catchments. This paper employs a dual-method concept that integrates a multi-criteria ranking method and the El-Shamy approach in conjunction with morphotectonic analysis to model flood-susceptibility zones. Furthermore, this paper suggests a comparative assessment of low-cost morphometric models under data-scarce conditions, assessing the multi-criteria ranking method against El-Shamy’s approach, using the topographic position index (TPI) as an internal terrain scale benchmark. The ranking method successfully assigned 85.7% of the historically recorded flood locations to the high-hazard zone that covers ~24.22% of the Hanefah catchment. In contrast, the El-Shamy approach systematically underestimated flood susceptibility because regional tectonic activity increases bifurcation ratios, resulting in just ~42.9% of the historical floods being assigned to the high-hazard zone. The final results highlight the northern and northwestern parts of the catchment as high-hazard zones, characterized by high drainage density and steep relief. This study provides a refined, cost-effective model that aligns with the strategic objectives of Saudi Vision 2030 for sustainable water resources management and significant urban development.
Keywords: natural hazards; morphometric parameters; topographic index; integrated methods; sustainable plans; Saudi Arabia natural hazards; morphometric parameters; topographic index; integrated methods; sustainable plans; Saudi Arabia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bashir, B.; Okayli, M. Multiple Approaches to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Flash Flooding in the Hanefah Catchment, Central Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2026, 18, 6080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126080

AMA Style

Bashir B, Okayli M. Multiple Approaches to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Flash Flooding in the Hanefah Catchment, Central Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 2026; 18(12):6080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bashir, Bashar, and Maan Okayli. 2026. "Multiple Approaches to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Flash Flooding in the Hanefah Catchment, Central Saudi Arabia" Sustainability 18, no. 12: 6080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126080

APA Style

Bashir, B., & Okayli, M. (2026). Multiple Approaches to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Flash Flooding in the Hanefah Catchment, Central Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 18(12), 6080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18126080

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop