IoT-Based Sensor Monitoring and Automated Irrigation Control for Sustainable Smallholder Vegetable Production: A Case Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Architecture of the System
2.1.1. Data Measurement Layer
2.1.2. Processing and Communication Layers
2.1.3. Data Storage and Display
2.1.4. Irrigation Control Strategy
Economic Water Productivity (EWP)
2.2. Evaluation of Economic Effects
2.3. Study Area
2.4. Soil and Plant Materials
2.5. Implementation of Greenhouse
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| SN | Sensor network |
| ML | Machine learning |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| SDG | Sustainable Development Goal |
| WUE | Water use efficiency |
| EWP | Economic water productivity |
| ROI | Return on investment |
| BCR | benefit–cost ratio |
| PP | payback period |
References
- Bayih, A.Z.; Morales, J.; Assabie, Y.; De By, R.A. Utilization of internet of things and wireless sensor networks for sustainable smallholder agriculture. Sensors 2022, 22, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kapari, M.; Hlophe-Ginindza, S.; Nhamo, L.; Mpandeli, S. Contribution of smallholder farmers to food security and opportunities for resilient farming systems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1149854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nzima, W.M.; Ip, R.H.; Bhatti, M.A.; Godfrey, S.S.; Eik, L.O.; Gondwe, S.R.; Divon, S.A. Diversity and heterogeneity of smallholder vegetable farming systems and their impact on food security and income in Malawi. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1387912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udayanga, S.; Bellanthudawa, B.; De Zoysa, H. Sustainable agriculture and responsible use of pesticides: Commercial crop cultivators’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice perspectives regarding pesticide use. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1490110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolfarici, S.L.; Zibaei, M.; Jahangirpour, D. The role of market in motivating farmers to reduce pesticide use: Evidence from vegetable farms in Shiraz. Heliyon 2024, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muharomah, R.; Setiawan, B.I.; Sands, G.R.; Juliana, I.C.; Gunawan, T.A. A review on enhancing water productivities adaptive to the climate change. J. Water Clim. Change 2025, 16, 860–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athelly, A.; Guzmán, S.M.; Yu, Z.; Watson, J.A. Bridging the gap between water-saving technologies and adoption in vegetable farming: Insights from Florida, USA. Front. Agron. 2025, 7, 1622260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gwambene, B.; Liwenga, E.; Mung’ong’o, C. Climate change and variability impacts on agricultural production and food security for the smallholder farmers in Rungwe, Tanzania. Environ. Manag. 2023, 71, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abebaw, S.E. A global review of the impacts of climate change and variability on agricultural productivity and farmers’ adaptation strategies. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 13, e70260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iakovidis, D.; Gadanakis, Y.; Campos-Gonzalez, J.; Park, J. Optimising decision support tools for the agricultural sector. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27, 25043–25067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soussi, A.; Zero, E.; Sacile, R.; Trinchero, D.; Fossa, M. Smart sensors and smart data for precision agriculture: A review. Sensors 2024, 24, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, T.; Mikiciuk, G.; Durlik, I.; Mikiciuk, M.; Łobodzińska, A.; Śnieg, M. The IoT and AI in agriculture: The time is now—A systematic review of smart sensing technologies. Sensors 2025, 25, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sudha, S.; Loret, J. A review on machine learning-based precision agriculture techniques for crop farming monitoring with IOT. Discov. Environ. 2026, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Fang, H.; Yang, F.; Li, K.; Han, R.; Li, T. A lightweight detector with hybrid pooling and checkerboard attention for solar panel anomalies. Iscience 2026, 29, 115106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manono, B.O.; Mwami, B.; Mutavi, S.; Nzilu, F. Precision farming with smart sensors: Current state, challenges and future outlook. Sensors 2026, 26, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eze, V.H.U.; Eze, E.C.; Alaneme, G.U.; Bubu, P.E.; Nnadi, E.O.E.; Okon, M.B. Integrating IoT sensors and machine learning for sustainable precision agroecology: Enhancing crop resilience and resource efficiency through data-driven strategies, challenges, and future prospects. Discov. Agric. 2025, 3, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Hussain, T.; Zahid, A. Smart irrigation technologies and prospects for enhancing water use efficiency for sustainable agriculture. AgriEngineering 2025, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morchid, A.; Et-taibi, B.; Oughannou, Z.; El Alami, R.; Qjidaa, H.; Jamil, M.O.; Abid, M.R. IoT-enabled smart agriculture for improving water management: A smart irrigation control using embedded systems and Server-Sent Events. Sci. Afr. 2025, 27, e02527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nižetić, S.; Šolić, P.; Gonzalez-De, D.L.-D.-I.; Patrono, L. Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities, issues and challenges towards a smart and sustainable future. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 122877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meriç, M.K. Implementation of a wireless sensor network for irrigation management in drip irrigation systems. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 14157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valente, A.; Costa, C.; Pereira, L.; Soares, B.; Lima, J.; Soares, S. A LoRaWAN IoT system for smart agriculture for vine water status determination. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa, P.; Sugeru, H.; Wibowo, E.P. Wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture: A review of NPK sensor implementations. Sensors 2023, 24, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nramat, W.; Songkroh, E.; Boonma, P.; Traiphat, W.; Martwong, E.; Thararattanasuwan, K.; Thiabgoh, O. Implementation of a Wireless Sensor Network for Agro-Environmental Monitoring and Growing Degree Day-Based Rice Growth Assessment. Eng 2026, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-Q.; Weng, J.-P.; Tie, F.-L.; Sun, B.-X.; Wang, W.-X. Design of Wireless Sensor Network Node for Monitoring Rice Field. In 3rd International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks (WCSN 2016); Atlantis Press: Wuhan, China, 2016; pp. 612–616. [Google Scholar]
- Jarro-Espinal, I.; Huanuqueño-Murillo, J.; Quille-Mamani, J.; Quispe-Tito, D.; Ramos-Fernández, L.; Pino-Vargas, E.; Torres-Rua, A. Field-Scale rice yield prediction in Northern Coastal Region of Peru Using Sentinel-2 vegetation indices and machine learning models. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samutrak, P.; Tongkam, S. IoT-driven soil moisture monitoring in organic rice cultivation. Eng. Access 2024, 10, 230–237. [Google Scholar]
- Munadi, R.; Rahmat, B. Wireless Sensor Network for Monitoring Rice Crop Growth. MESA (Tek. Mesin Tek. Elektro Tek. Sipil Tek. Arsit.) 2018, 3, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
- Bouni, M.; Hssina, B.; Douzi, K.; Douzi, S. Integrated IoT approaches for crop recommendation and yield-prediction using machine-learning. IoT 2024, 5, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, J.; Ban, Q. The farm-level economic and environmental benefits of precision agriculture technology adoption: A meta-analysis of global evidence. Sustainability 2025, 17, 11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varzakas, T.; Smaoui, S. Global food security and sustainability issues: The road to 2030 from nutrition and sustainable healthy diets to food systems change. Foods 2024, 13, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miles, A.F.; Phipps, B.E.; Berry, E.M. Food system transformation and the realization of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1691198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiywotu, A.M. Advancing sustainable agriculture for goal 2: Zero hunger-a comprehensive overview of practices, policies, and technologies. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 49, 1027–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolfert, S.; Isakhanyan, G. Sustainable agriculture by the Internet of Things–A practitioner’s approach to monitor sustainability progress. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 200, 107226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Ren, F.; Wang, Y. Evaluation and pathways for achieving agricultural resilience under the framework of climate-smart agriculture. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2025, 13, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debauche, O.; El Moulat, M.; Mahmoudi, S.; Boukraa, S.; Manneback, P.; Lebeau, F. Web monitoring of bee health for researchers and beekeepers based on the internet of things. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 130, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Postolache, S.; Sebastião, P.; Viegas, V.; Postolache, O.; Cercas, F. IoT-based systems for soil nutrients assessment in horticulture. Sensors 2022, 23, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hercog, D.; Lerher, T.; Truntič, M.; Težak, O. Design and implementation of ESP32-based IoT devices. Sensors 2023, 23, 6739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morchid, A.; Jebabra, R.; Qjidaa, H.; El Alami, R.; Jamil, M.O. Agri-tech innovations for sustainability: A fire detection system based on MQTT broker and IoT to improve environmental risk management. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Has, M.; Kreković, D.; Kušek, M.; Žarko, I.P. Efficient data management in agricultural IoT: Compression, security, and MQTT protocol analysis. Sensors 2024, 24, 3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansoor, S.; Iqbal, S.; Popescu, S.M.; Kim, S.L.; Chung, Y.S.; Baek, J.-H. Integration of smart sensors and IOT in precision agriculture: Trends, challenges and future prospectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1587869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sheshny, A.A.; Abdel-Hameed, A.M.; Al-Rajhi, M.; Ghanem, H.G.; Elzanaty, T.M.; Fayed, M.H. Optimizing water management in greenhouse farming through an IoT-enabled monitoring system. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2025, 24, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoover, D.L.; Abendroth, L.J.; Browning, D.M.; Saha, A.; Snyder, K.; Wagle, P.; Scott, R.L. Indicators of water use efficiency across diverse agroecosystems and spatiotemporal scales. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 864, 160992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatfield, J.L.; Dold, C. Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vishnumolakala, S.S.S.; Jia, X.; Goodspeed, I.M.; Hatterman-Valenti, H. Evaluating irrigation strategies and cultivar response of tomato and pepper under automated drip systems in high tunnel and open field environments in North Dakota. Front. Agron. 2025, 7, 1540521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awoke, Y.; Tewabe, D.; Abebe, A. Comparative evaluation of bed and conventional irrigation methods on yield and water productivity of wheat. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2025, 71, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perelli, C.; Branca, G.; Corbari, C.; Mancini, M. Physical and economic water productivity in agriculture between traditional and water-saving irrigation systems: A case study in Southern Italy. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, S.; Singh, S. Assessing groundwater use efficiency and productivity across Punjab agriculture: District and farm size perspectives. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ichsani, S.; Suhardi, A.R. The effect of return on equity (ROE) and return on investment (ROI) on trading volume. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 211, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nramat, W.; Traiphat, W.; Martwong, E.; Treemongkol, P.; Phatedoung, L.; Thiabgoh, O. Design and Thermal Performance Evaluation of a High-Efficiency Solar Dryer Capsule with Integrated Parabolic Reflector. Eng 2026, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kpenekuu, F.; Antwi-Agyei, P.; Nimoh, F.; Dougill, A.; Banunle, A.; Atta-Aidoo, J.; Guodaar, L. Cost and benefit analysis of Climate-Smart Agriculture interventions in the dryland farming systems of northern Ghana. Reg. Sustain. 2025, 6, 100196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinyi, D.P.; Ng, S.K.; Ngigi, M.; Mathenge, M.; Girvetz, E. Cost-benefit analysis of prioritized climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder farmers: Evidence from selected value chains across sub-Saharan Africa. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Traiphat, W.; Nramat, W.; Sukruan, P.; Utaprom, P.; Piamboriboon, P.; Naramat, S. Experiments comparing the efficency between watering vegetable crops with traditional methods and automatic watering systems. EUREKA Phys. Eng. 2025, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Kaiser, E.; Heuvelink, E.; Cao, K.; Bian, Z.; Yang, Q.; Marcelis, L.F. Palette of green: Exploring the effects of different wavelengths of green light on biomass and morphology in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2025, 238, 106242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amirshekari, M.H.; Fakhroleslam, M. Impact of artificial light on photosynthesis, evapotranspiration, and plant growth in plant factories: Mathematical modeling for balancing energy consumption and crop productivity. Smart Agric. Technol. 2025, 11, 100901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adekiya, A.O.; Dahunsi, S.O.; Adedokun, O.D.; Agbede, T.M.; Oche, P.-J.A.; Ogunbode, T.O. Optimizing Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity Using Biodigestate, Poultry Manure, and NPK Integration. Clean. Circ. Bioecon. 2025, 12, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Su, H.; Lai, J.; Sheng, Y.; Shen, Y. Optimization of NPK nutrient ratios for three leafy vegetables using response surface methodology and principal component analysis. Plants 2025, 14, 3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barmon, S.K.; Alam, M.N.; Aktar, S.; Hasan, M. Effect of light and temperature on growing lettuce crop in greenhouse by using Iot Technology. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2025, 14, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Castillo, J.; Guerrero-Ibañez, J.A.; Santana-Mancilla, P.C.; Anido-Rifon, L. SAgric-IoT: An IoT-based platform and deep learning for greenhouse monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srisawat, T.; Sakprom, S.; Kunsawat, P.; Praksong, K.; Suchat, S.; Muangprathub, J. IoT-enabled agricultural environmental monitoring: Enhancing growth and yield using natural-rubber straw and mulching experiment. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 225, 120524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mércia de Sá, J.; Ismael Inácio Cardoso, A.; Seguchi, D.S.; de Ávila, J.; Carvalho, J.R.D.; Possas de Souza, E.; Gomes Nakada-Freitas, P. Growth Curve and Nutrient Accumulation in Lettuce for Seed Production Under Organic System. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.-B.; Kim, Y.-M.; Sung, J.-K.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lee, D.-B. Characteristics of growth-stage-based nutrient uptake of lettuce grown by fertigation supply in a greenhouse. Korean J. Soil. Sci. Fertil. 2018, 51, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Sensor | Parameter | Range | Accuracy | Supply | Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM2315C | Humidity | 0–100% RH | ±2% | 2.2–5.5 VDC, 980 μA | I2C |
| AM2315C | Temperature | −40 to 80 °C | ±0.3 | 2.2–5.5 VDC, 980 μA | I2C |
| BH1750 | Light intensity | 1–65,535 lux | ±0.2 | 2.4–3.6 V, 120 μA | I2C |
| RS485 (NPK) | Nitrogen | 1–1999 mg/kg | ±2% | 5–30 VDC | RS485 |
| Phosphorus | 1–1999 mg/kg | ±2% | 5–30 VDC | RS485 | |
| Potassium | 1–1999 mg/kg | ±2% | 5–30 VDC | RS485 | |
| Flow sensor | Flow rate | 1–30 L/min | ±3% | DC 4.5 V, 15 mA | Output pulse |
| Parameters | Nominal Values | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Operating temperature | ≥37.5 °C | Triggered when temperature exceeds threshold (AM2315C sensor) |
| Operating frequency | 4 times/day | - |
| Duration of work | 4 min | Fixed duration per cycle |
| Water intake per time | 8 L | - |
| Daily water intake | 32 L | Maximum water used |
| WUE (kg/L) | EWP (USD/L) | ROI (%) | BCR | PP (y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | 75 | 40 | 1.6 | 2.5 |
| SDG | SDG Support | Quantitative Evidence |
|---|---|---|
![]() | The sensor network system includes AM2315C, BH1750, and NPK sensors that measure environmental temperature, light intensity, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. It improves the reliability of the vegetable production process. | It supports real-time environmental monitoring for greenhouse vegetable production. |
![]() | A water management system with sensor networks accurately reduces irrigation losses. | Pilot implementation demonstrated reduced irrigation water consumption and a WUE of 0.63 kg/L under greenhouse conditions. |
![]() | Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium measurements with NPK sensors enable reduced fertilizer use and greater accuracy. | Real-time monitoring of N, P, and K concentration trends was carried out within the sensor operating range of 1–1999 mg/kg using NPK sensors. |
![]() | The fogging system reduces heat stress. This makes salad vegetables grow well. | The system automatically triggered mist irrigation at temperatures ≥ 37.5 °C to reduce heat stress conditions. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Nramat, W.; Treemongkol, P.; Traiphat, W.; Thiabgoh, O.; Martwong, E. IoT-Based Sensor Monitoring and Automated Irrigation Control for Sustainable Smallholder Vegetable Production: A Case Study. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115753
Nramat W, Treemongkol P, Traiphat W, Thiabgoh O, Martwong E. IoT-Based Sensor Monitoring and Automated Irrigation Control for Sustainable Smallholder Vegetable Production: A Case Study. Sustainability. 2026; 18(11):5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115753
Chicago/Turabian StyleNramat, Wichai, Patcha Treemongkol, Wasakorn Traiphat, Ongard Thiabgoh, and Ekkachai Martwong. 2026. "IoT-Based Sensor Monitoring and Automated Irrigation Control for Sustainable Smallholder Vegetable Production: A Case Study" Sustainability 18, no. 11: 5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115753
APA StyleNramat, W., Treemongkol, P., Traiphat, W., Thiabgoh, O., & Martwong, E. (2026). IoT-Based Sensor Monitoring and Automated Irrigation Control for Sustainable Smallholder Vegetable Production: A Case Study. Sustainability, 18(11), 5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115753





