Assessing Mangrove Recovery Dynamics and Replacement Cost Estimates for Sustainable Coastal Management Using a Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing and GEP Accounting Framework in Dongzhai Harbor, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources and Preprocessing
2.2.1. Shoreline Data
2.2.2. Mangrove Reference and Validation Data
2.2.3. Typhoon Event Characterization
2.3. Mangrove Classification Data and Accuracy Assessment
2.4. Shoreline Change Quantification
2.5. Mangrove-Shoreline Spatial Association Analysis
2.5.1. Shoreline Dynamic Classification
2.5.2. Mangrove-Aligned Shoreline Quantification
2.5.3. Statistical Association Testing
2.6. Coastal Protection Service Valuation Using Replacement Cost Method
2.6.1. Valuation Model
2.6.2. Parameter Specification
2.6.3. Sensitivity Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Coastal Line Extraction and Spatiotemporal Evolution
3.2. Mangrove Distribution Dynamics and Typhoon Resilience Assessment
3.2.1. Typhoon Impact and Spatial Heterogeneity (2010–2015)
3.2.2. Recovery Dynamics and Management Implications (2015–2021)
3.3. Coupling Relationship Analysis
3.3.1. Multi-Period Coupling Patterns
3.3.2. Multi-Scale Buffer Analysis
3.3.3. Spatial Distribution Patterns
3.3.4. Statistical Characterization of Mangrove-Shoreline Associations
3.4. Coastal Protection Value
4. Discussion
4.1. Mangrove Shoreline Dynamics and Typhoon Resilience
4.2. Protection Value and Limitations
4.3. Implications for GEP Accounting and Coastal Management
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| NbSs | Nature-based Solutions |
| GEP | Gross Ecosystem Product |
| SEEA-EA | System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting |
| MNDWI | Modified Normalized Difference Water Index |
| NDVI | Normalized Difference Vegetation Index |
| DSAS | Digital Shoreline Analysis System |
| CRF | Capital Recovery Factor |
| GIS | Geographic Information System |
| CMA | China Meteorological Administration |
| OAT | One-factor-at-a-time |
| PRV | Potential Replacement Value |
References
- Hinkel, J.; Lincke, D.; Vafeidis, A.T.; Perrette, M.; Nicholls, R.J.; Tol, R.S.J.; Marzeion, B.; Fettweis, X.; Ionescu, C.; Levermann, A. Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3292–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, M.-K.; Lee, B.; Park, M.; Kwon, H.-H. Enhancing seawall resilience: A probabilistic analysis of armor stone stability against wave-induced forces. J. Coast. Res. 2025, 113, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menéndez, P.; Losada, I.J.; Torres-Ortega, S.; Narayan, S.; Beck, M.W. The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Wu, T.; Ouyang, Z.; Polasky, S.; Ruckelshaus, M.; Wang, L.; Xiao, Y.; Gao, X.; Li, C.; Daily, G.C. Gross ecosystem product (GEP): Quantifying nature for environmental and economic policy innovation. Ambio 2023, 52, 1952–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting: Ecosystem Accounting; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ouyang, Z.; Song, C.; Zheng, H.; Polasky, S.; Xiao, Y.; Bateman, I.J.; Liu, J.; Ruckelshaus, M.; Shi, F.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 14593–14601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arkema, K.K.; Griffin, R.; Maldonado, S.; Silver, J.; Suckale, J.; Guerry, A.D. Linking social, ecological, and physical science to advance natural and nature-based protection for coastal communities. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1399, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Jiao, H.; Chen, G.; Shen, J.; Huang, Z.; Luo, H. Forest damage by super typhoon Rammasun and post-disturbance recovery using Landsat imagery and the machine-learning method. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayassamy, P. Mangroves as a nature-based solution and a tool for coastal resilience. Wetlands 2025, 45, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Si, T.; Qiu, P.; Li, L.; Zhou, W.; Chen, C.; Shi, Q.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Y. Land use change and mangrove restoration modulate heavy metal accumulation in tropical coastal sediments: A nearly decade-long study from Hainan, China. Land 2025, 14, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hochard, J.P.; Hamilton, S.; Barbier, E.B. Mangroves shelter coastal economic activity from cyclones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12232–12237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.M.; Huang, L.; Bin, X. Spatial and temporal changes of heavy metals in coastal mangrove sediment in China: Review of present status. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 19, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setiyaningrum, I.F.; Harini, R.; Wirasanti, N. Economic valuation of the mangrove ecosystem in Purwodadi Sub-district, Purworejo Regency, Central Java. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 451, 012052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, M.W.; Losada, I.J.; Menéndez, P.; Reguero, B.G.; Díaz-Simal, P.; Fernández, F. The global flood protection savings provided by coral reefs. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Leung, F.; Wang, W. Assessing typhoon impacts on mangroves and post-typhoon recovery patterns to inform projects using mangroves as nature-based solutions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2025, 61, e03667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Lin, P.; Chen, X. Coastal protection by planted mangrove forest during typhoon Mangkhut. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reckner, M.; Tien, I. Community-scale spatial mapping to prioritize green and grey infrastructure locations to increase flood resilience. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. 2023, 8, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabello, K.E.; Germentil, M.Q.; Blanco, A.C.; Macatulad, E.G.; Salmo, S.G., III. Post-disaster assessment of mangrove forest recovery in Lawaan-Balangiga, Eastern Samar using NDVI time series analysis. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 3, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, X.; Deng, Y.; Ke, X.; Peng, K.; Xie, X.; Gan, Y.; Li, Q. Sedimentary evolution and mangrove dynamics in Dongzhai Harbor, Hainan Island since the late Pleistocene. J. Earth Sci. 2025, 36, 2251–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, Y.; Ming-Xun, R.E.N. Species distribution pattern and formation mechanism of mangrove plants around the South China Sea. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2023, 47, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, J.; Meng, Y.; Gou, R.; Lyu, J.; Dai, Z.; Diao, X.; Zhang, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, X.; Lin, G. Mangrove diversity enhances plant biomass production and carbon storage in Hainan island, China. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, C.; Song, X.; Xie, Y.; Wang, C.; Luo, J.; Fang, Y.; Cao, B.; Qiu, Z. Research on the spatiotemporal evolution of mangrove forests in the Hainan Island from 1991 to 2021 based on SVM and Res-UNet algorithms. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Chen, B. The 30-m Datasets of Coastline Changes in Hainan Island from 1990 to 2020. 2022. Available online: https://data.casearth.cn/thematic/hainan/243 (accessed on 16 January 2025).
- Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, O.; Zhang, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, F.; et al. The performance of Landsat-8 and Landsat-9 data for water body extraction based on various water indices: A comparative analysis. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pekel, J.-F.; Cottam, A.; Gorelick, N.; Belward, A.S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 2016, 540, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhao, T.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Mi, J. GISD30: Global 30 m impervious-surface dynamic dataset from 1985 to 2020 using time-series Landsat imagery on the Google Earth Engine platform. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 1831–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arekhi, M.; Goksel, C.; Balik Sanli, F.; Senel, G. Comparative evaluation of the spectral and spatial consistency of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 OLI data for Igneada Longos Forest. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop-Taylor, R.; Nanson, R.; Sagar, S.; Lymburner, L. Mapping Australia’s dynamic coastline at mean sea level using three decades of Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 267, 112734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apostolopoulos, D.; Nikolakopoulos, K. A review and meta-analysis of remote sensing data, GIS methods, materials and indices used for monitoring the coastline evolution over the last twenty years. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2021, 54, 240–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, N.; Li, N.; Li, X. Research on accounting of ecosystem services flow based ecological compensation: A case study of 18 cities and counties of Hainan Island. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2025, 41, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, X.; Cai, R.; Guo, H.; Xu, W.; Tan, H. Vulnerability of Hainan Dongzhaigang mangrove ecosystem to the climate change. J. Appl. Oceanogr. 2019, 38, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, M.; Shu, X.; Luo, J.; Qiu, L.; Gao, T. Risk assessment for typhoon-induced storm surges in Wenchang, Hainan Island of China. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2021, 12, 880–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, M.; Zhang, W.; Yu, H.; Lu, X.; Feng, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, D. An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2014, 31, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Yu, H.; Ying, M.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, S.; Lin, L.; Bai, L.; Wan, R. Western North Pacific tropical cyclone database created by the China Meteorological Administration. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 38, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velázquez-Salazar, S.; Valderrama-Landeros, L.; Villeda-Chávez, E.; Cervantes-Rodríguez, C.G.; Troche-Souza, C.; Alcántara-Maya, J.A.; Vázquez-Balderas, B.; Rodríguez-Zúñiga, M.T.; Cruz-López, M.I.; Flores-de-Santiago, F.; et al. Mangrove damage and early-stage canopy recovery following hurricane Roslyn in Marismas Nacionales, Mexico. Forests 2025, 16, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, Y.; Simard, M.; Hall, J.W. Tropical cyclone risk to global mangrove ecosystems: Potential future regional shifts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2023, 21, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Chen, Y.; Lei, J.; Zhou, X.; Yao, P.; Stive, M.J.F. Experimental investigation of wave attenuation by mangrove forests with submerged canopies. Coast. Eng. 2023, 186, 104403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karasiak, N.; Dejoux, J.-F.; Monteil, C.; Sheeren, D. Spatial dependence between training and test sets: Another pitfall of classification accuracy assessment in remote sensing. Mach. Learn. 2022, 111, 2715–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Wesenbeeck, B.K.; van Zelst, V.T.M.; Antolinez, J.A.A.; de Boer, W.P. Quantifying uncertainty in wave attenuation by mangroves to inform coastal green belt policies. Commun. Earth Environ. 2025, 6, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Wang, J.; Sang, Y.; Li, K.; Liu, J.; Yang, G. An effective deep learning model for monitoring mangroves: A case study of the Indus Delta. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasquez, J.; Acevedo-Barrios, R.; Miranda-Castro, W.; Guerrero, M.; Meneses-Ospina, L. Determining changes in mangrove cover using remote sensing with Landsat images: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2023, 235, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentaschi, L.; Vousdoukas, M.I.; Pekel, J.-F.; Voukouvalas, E.; Feyen, L. Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Himmelstoss, E.A.; Henderson, R.E.; Kratzmann, M.G.; Farris, A.S. Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS), Version 5.0, User Guide; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018-1179; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2018; 110p. [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Arias, F.; Maza, M.; Calleja, F.; Govaere, G.; Lara, J.L. Integrated drag coefficient formula for estimating the wave attenuation capacity of Rhizophora sp. mangrove forests. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1383368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Mo, W.; Xiong, L.; Hu, X.; Cheng, H. Field investigation of wave attenuation in a mangrove forest dominated by Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Viern. Plants 2025, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baig, M.R.I.; Ahmad, I.A.; Shahfahad; Tayyab, M.; Rahman, A. Analysis of shoreline changes in Vishakhapatnam coastal tract of Andhra Pradesh, India: An application of digital shoreline analysis system (DSAS). Ann. GIS 2020, 26, 361–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perricone, V.; Mutalipassi, M.; Mele, A.; Buono, M.; Vicinanza, D.; Contestabile, P. Nature-based and bioinspired solutions for coastal protection: An overview among key ecosystems and a promising pathway for new functional and sustainable designs. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2023, 80, 1218–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridges, T.S.; Smith, J.M.; King, J.K.; Simm, J.D.; Dillard, M.; deVries, J.; Reed, D.; Piercy, C.D.; van Zanten, B.; Arkema, K.; et al. Coastal natural and nature-based features: International guidelines for flood risk management. Front. Built Environ. 2022, 8, 904483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayan, S.; Beck, M.W.; Reguero, B.G.; Losada, I.J.; van Wesenbeeck, B.; Pontee, N.; Sanchirico, J.N.; Ingram, J.C.; Lange, G.-M.; Burks-Copes, K.A. The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Zeng, J.; Ge, Z.-M.; Yun, P.; Zhu, K.-H.; Zhou, K.; Liu, S.-X.; Lyu, Q.; Chen, H.-Y. Dike risk evaluation incorporating the contribution of coastal wetlands: A case study on Chongming Island, China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2023, 245, 106874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, H.; Yu, T.; Xi, W.; Lu, L.; Fong, W.K.; Cao, Y.; Kuang, S.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; et al. Accelerating Climate-Resilient Infrastructure Investment in China; World Resources Institute: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toimil, A.; Camus, P.; Losada, I.J.; Le Cozannet, G.; Nicholls, R.J.; Idier, D.; Maspataud, A. Climate change-driven coastal erosion modelling in temperate sandy beaches: Methods and uncertainty treatment. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2020, 202, 103110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 51015-2014; Code for Design of Sea Dike Project. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2014. Available online: https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/GBT51015-2014 (accessed on 23 April 2026).
- Zheng, H.; Wang, L.; Peng, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Robinson, B.E.; Wu, X.; Kong, L.; Li, R.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Realizing the values of natural capital for inclusive, sustainable development: Informing China’s new ecological development strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 8623–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luisetti, T.; Ferrini, S.; Grilli, G.; Jickells, T.D.; Kennedy, H.; Kröger, S.; Lorenzoni, I.; Milligan, B.; van der Molen, J.; Parker, R.; et al. Climate action requires new accounting guidance and governance frameworks to manage carbon in shelf seas. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Braat, L.; Kubiszewski, I.; Fioramonti, L.; Sutton, P.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 28, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, R.J.; Lincke, D.; Hinkel, J.; Brown, S.; Vafeidis, A.T.; Meyssignac, B.; Hanson, S.E.; Merkens, J.-L.; Fang, J. A global analysis of subsidence, relative sea-level change and coastal flood exposure. Nat. Clim. Change 2021, 11, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y. Research on price index and price difference index of water conservancy projects. China Price J. 2022, 9, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Li, X.; Ma, C.-F.; Zhu, G.-F.; Luan, W.-F.; Zhong, J.-T.; Tan, M.-B.; Fu, J. Uncertainty analysis of ecosystem services and implications for environmental management: An experiment in the Heihe River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 821, 153481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gijsman, R.; Horstman, E.M.; Swales, A.; Balke, T.; Willemsen, P.W.J.M.; Van Der Wal, D.; Wijnberg, K.M. Biophysical modeling of mangrove seedling establishment and survival across an elevation gradient with forest zones. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2024, 129, e2024JF007664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Zelst, V.T.M.; Dijkstra, J.T.; van Wesenbeeck, B.K.; Eilander, D.; Morris, E.P.; Winsemius, H.C.; Ward, P.J.; de Vries, M.B. Cutting the costs of coastal protection by integrating vegetation in flood defences. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, R.; Walther, M.; Lovelock, C.; Jiang, J.; Berger, U. The interplay between vegetation and water in mangroves: New perspectives for mangrove stand modelling and ecological research. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 28, 697–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Z.; Temmerman, S.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.; Xu, T.; Schoutens, K.; Suzuki, T.; Yang, Z.; Bouma, T.J. Predicting nature-based coastal protection by mangroves under extreme waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2410883122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Zanten, B.; Brander, L.M.; Castaneda, J.-P.; Herrera, D.; Kaczan, D.; Brown, B.M.; Smith, I.A.; Jongman, B. Integrated spatial cost-benefit analysis of large-scale mangrove conservation and restoration in Indonesia. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1459034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, S.; Toumi, R.; Song, X.; Wang, Q. Recent increases in tropical cyclone rapid intensification events in global offshore regions. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zou, C.; Xu, D.; Lin, N.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K. China’s ecological conservation redline: A solution for future nature conservation. Ambio 2020, 49, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Chen, T.; Jin, F.; Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Xu, Y.; Dai, E.; Tao, A.; et al. Reshaping the sustainable geographical pattern: A major function zoning model and its applications in China. Earth’s Future 2019, 7, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seddon, N.; Daniels, E.; Davis, R.; Chausson, A.; Harris, R.; Hou-Jones, X.; Huq, S.; Kapos, V.; Mace, G.M.; Rizvi, A.R.; et al. Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Glob. Sustain. 2020, 3, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friess, D.A.; Yando, E.S.; Abuchahla, G.M.O.; Adams, J.B.; Cannicci, S.; Canty, S.W.J.; Cavanaugh, K.C.; Connolly, R.M.; Cormier, N.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; et al. Mangroves give cause for conservation optimism, for now. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R153–R154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Period | Classification | Mangroves | Non-Mangroves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Mangroves | 115 | 3 |
| 2010 | Non-mangroves | 19 | 503 |
| 2010 | Total | 134 | 506 |
| 2015 | Mangroves | 112 | 1 |
| 2015 | Non-mangroves | 22 | 499 |
| 2015 | Total | 134 | 500 |
| 2021 | Mangroves | 141 | 6 |
| 2021 | Non-mangroves | 10 | 503 |
| 2021 | Total | 151 | 509 |
| Predicted Mangrove | Predicted Non-Mangrove | Row Total (ha) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Mangrove | 1219.68 | 937.47 | 2157.15 |
| Reference Non-mangrove | 61.06 | 20,041.90 | 20,102.96 |
| Column total (ha) | 1280.73 | 20,979.37 | 22,260.11 |
| Coast Type | Number of Transects | Percentage (%) | Mean Change (m) | Standard Deviation (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erosion | 330 | 29.40% | 83.83 | 79.27 |
| Stable | 268 | 23.90% | −0.04 | 0.24 |
| Accretion | 524 | 46.70% | −68.15 | 82.01 |
| Total | 1122 | 100.00% | −7.18 | 95.76 |
| Period | Layer Role | Mangrove Year | Coast Type | Total Transects | With Mangrove | Percentage (%) | Avg. Change (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–2015 | flow_component | 2010 | Erosion | 264 | 183 | 69.3 | 76.44 |
| 2010–2015 | flow_component | 2010 | Stable | 331 | 199 | 60.1 | 0 |
| 2010–2015 | flow_component | 2010 | Accretion | 384 | 235 | 61.2 | −67.76 |
| 2015–2021 | flow_component | 2015 | Erosion | 290 | 173 | 59.7 | 66.01 |
| 2015–2021 | flow_component | 2015 | Stable | 332 | 229 | 69 | −0.02 |
| 2015–2021 | flow_component | 2015 | Accretion | 417 | 278 | 66.7 | −51.15 |
| 2010–2021 | capacity_check | 2021 | Erosion | 330 | 242 | 73.3 | 83.83 |
| 2010–2021 | capacity_check | 2021 | Stable | 268 | 203 | 75.7 | −0.04 |
| 2010–2021 | capacity_check | 2021 | Accretion | 524 | 400 | 76.3 | −68.15 |
| Shoreline Type | Mangrove Length (km) | Length Share (%) | Seawall Unit Cost (×104 CNY km−1) | α Q1 (Conservative, Baseline) | α Q2 (Moderate) | α Q3 (Optimistic) | α Literature Range | Annual Value Q1 (×104 CNY yr−1) | Annual Value Q2 (×104 CNY yr−1) | Annual Value Q3 (×104 CNY yr−1) | Unit Value Q1 (×104 CNY km−1 yr−1) | Value Share Q1 (%) | Capitalized Value 50 yr Q1 (×104 CNY) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erosion | 8.88 | 27.3 | 2404.1 | 0.3 | 0.35 | 0.4 | [0.25, 0.45] | 458.1 | 534.45 | 610.81 | 51.6 | 50.5 | 6402.6 |
| Stable | 10.77 | 33.1 | 1849.3 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.3 | [0.15, 0.35] | 284.96 | 356.21 | 427.45 | 26.46 | 31.4 | 3982.7 |
| Accretion | 12.92 | 39.7 | 1294.5 | 0.138 | 0.175 | 0.212 | [0.1, 0.25] | 164.58 | 209.46 | 254.35 | 12.74 | 18.1 | 2300.2 |
| Total | 32.57 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | 907.65 | 1100.12 | 1292.6 | — | 100 | 12,685.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Lin, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, P. Assessing Mangrove Recovery Dynamics and Replacement Cost Estimates for Sustainable Coastal Management Using a Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing and GEP Accounting Framework in Dongzhai Harbor, China. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115594
Lin Y, Liu W, Wang P. Assessing Mangrove Recovery Dynamics and Replacement Cost Estimates for Sustainable Coastal Management Using a Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing and GEP Accounting Framework in Dongzhai Harbor, China. Sustainability. 2026; 18(11):5594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115594
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Yuan, Wenjie Liu, and Peng Wang. 2026. "Assessing Mangrove Recovery Dynamics and Replacement Cost Estimates for Sustainable Coastal Management Using a Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing and GEP Accounting Framework in Dongzhai Harbor, China" Sustainability 18, no. 11: 5594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115594
APA StyleLin, Y., Liu, W., & Wang, P. (2026). Assessing Mangrove Recovery Dynamics and Replacement Cost Estimates for Sustainable Coastal Management Using a Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing and GEP Accounting Framework in Dongzhai Harbor, China. Sustainability, 18(11), 5594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115594

