Next Article in Journal
GMamba: A Lightweight Mamba Model for Garbage Classification
Previous Article in Journal
An Urbanization-Aware Remote Sensing Ecological Index for Urban Ecological Quality Assessment: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Floating Offshore Wind Power Generation in a Leading Emerging Market: The Case of Taiwan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Dynamic Calculation Method for Water Supply Benefits of Water Diversion Projects Incorporating Ecological Benefits

1
Henan Chushandian Reservoir Irrigation District Engineering Co., Ltd., Xinyang 464043, China
2
School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
3
Henan Yangtze-to-Huaihe Water Diversion Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(11), 5396; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115396
Submission received: 19 April 2026 / Revised: 17 May 2026 / Accepted: 26 May 2026 / Published: 27 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Economics and Sustainability)

Abstract

Ecological water supply has been integrated into the water supply scope of numerous water diversion projects, yet ecosystem complexity makes ecological benefit assessment difficult. Traditional quantitative methods for water supply benefits mainly focus on economic benefits from productive and domestic water use, ignoring the ecological benefits and real-time benefit changes over the project service period. This study categorizes ecological water supply separately in benefit calculation and considers enhanced ecosystem service value brought by ecological water replenishment. Based on emergy analysis, the water resource values of domestic, productive, and ecological water supply are calculated individually, and a water supply benefits evaluation model is established in combination with corresponding water supply volumes. A dynamic evaluation method for the project service period is further proposed using a Grey Model (1,1). Verified via the Yangtze-to-Huaihe Water Diversion Project (Henan section), results indicate that from 2021 to 2070, comprehensive water supply benefits increase yearly from 5.19 billion yuan to 16.18 billion yuan. Productive water supply provides the largest benefits (67–74%), followed by urban domestic (19–25%), rural domestic (5–7%), and ecological water supply (1–2%). This study constructs a comprehensive, systematic, and dynamic evaluation system, supporting the holistic assessment of the long-term economic and environmental impacts of water diversion projects.
Keywords: emergy analysis; water diversion project; water supply benefits; water resource values emergy analysis; water diversion project; water supply benefits; water resource values

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, B.; Sun, B.; Du, W.; Wang, H.; Ge, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. A Dynamic Calculation Method for Water Supply Benefits of Water Diversion Projects Incorporating Ecological Benefits. Sustainability 2026, 18, 5396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115396

AMA Style

Yuan B, Sun B, Du W, Wang H, Ge W, Li Z, Zhang Y. A Dynamic Calculation Method for Water Supply Benefits of Water Diversion Projects Incorporating Ecological Benefits. Sustainability. 2026; 18(11):5396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115396

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Bo, Baoxing Sun, Weibing Du, Hui Wang, Wei Ge, Zongkun Li, and Yadong Zhang. 2026. "A Dynamic Calculation Method for Water Supply Benefits of Water Diversion Projects Incorporating Ecological Benefits" Sustainability 18, no. 11: 5396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115396

APA Style

Yuan, B., Sun, B., Du, W., Wang, H., Ge, W., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2026). A Dynamic Calculation Method for Water Supply Benefits of Water Diversion Projects Incorporating Ecological Benefits. Sustainability, 18(11), 5396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115396

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop