Evaluating the Integration of Bio-based Waste into Cement Production: A Pathway to Sustainable Building
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Characterization
2.2. Clinker Preparation Methodology
2.3. Instrumental Analyses
2.4. Preparation of Cement Samples and Preliminary Testing of the Mechanical Strengths
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Thermal Analysis
3.2. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis
3.3. FTIR Analysis
3.4. Microstructural Identification
3.5. Mechanical Strengths of Experimental Cements
3.6. Practical Implementation of Eggshell Waste into Cement Manufacturing Process
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| OPC | Portland cement |
| C3S | Tricalcium silicate (alite) |
| C2S | Dicalcium silicate (belite) |
| C3A | Tricalcium aluminate |
| C4AF | Tetracalcium aluminoferrite |
| LSF | Lime saturated factor |
| SM | Silica modulus |
| AM | Alumina modulus |
| ESP | Eggshell powder |
| SCC | Self-compacting concrete |
| ED-XRF | Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence |
| PSD | Particle size distribution |
| SCMs | Supplementary cementitious materials |
| KI clay | Kaolinitic–illitic clay |
| DTA | Differential thermal analysis |
| TG | Thermo-gravimetry |
| XRD | X-ray diffraction |
| FTIR | Fourier transform infrared |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
| EDS | Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy |
| AAR | Alkali-aggregate reaction |
| ASR | Alkali–silica reaction |
References
- Shivaprasad, K.N.; Yang, H.-M.; Singh, J.K. A path to carbon neutrality in construction: An overview of recent progress in recycled cement usage. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 83, 102816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Z.; Zhu, W.; Li, L.; Jiang, C.; Yan, C.; Wang, Y.; Gao, J.; Luo, J. Carbon emissions assessment of cement mixing piles for soft loess improvement and carbon emission reduction using white mud-cement composite material. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 21, e03397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Han, L.; Liu, M.; Li, L. Spatial differentiation of carbon emissions from energy consumption based on machine learning algorithm: A case study during 2015–2020 in Shaanxi, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 149, 358–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Generowicz-Caba, N.; Kulczycka, J. LCA of Cement with Alternative Additives: Pathways to Sustainable Production. Materials 2025, 18, 3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avudaiappan, S.; Munoz, R.F.A.; Murali, G.; Chávez-Delgado, M.; Andres, R.-M.; Manidurai, P.; Flores, E.S.; Maureira-Carsalade, N. Resource recovery for sustainable construction: Strength and microstructure characteristics of municipal solid waste incineration ash as a green alternative to cement in cementitious composites. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 24, e05675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, M. The cement industry on the way to a low-carbon future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sbahieh, S.; McKay, G.; Nurdiawati, A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. The sustainability of partial and total replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement: A deep dive into different concrete mixtures through life cycle assessment. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 108, 112830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majhi, R.K.; Shin, S.; Kim, J.; Patro, S.K. Towards sustainable cement: Review of blended binder systems and performance-based specification strategies. Mater. Today Sustain. 2026, 34, 101328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, H.F.W. Cement Chemistry; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ludwig, H.-M.; Zhang, W. Research review of cement clinker chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rößler, C.; Zimmer, D.; Trimby, P.; Ludwig, H.-M. Chemical–crystallographic characterisation of cement clinkers by EBSD-EDS analysis in the SEM. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 154, 106721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, M.; Romer, M.; Tschudin, M.; Bolio, H. Sustainable cement production—Present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, M. Process technology for efficient and sustainable cement production. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terán-Cuadrado, G.; Tahir, F.; Nurdiawati, A.; Almarshoud, M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Current and potential materials for the low-carbon cement production: Life cycle assessment perspective. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulčić, H.; Klemeš, J.J.; Vujanović, M.; Urbaniec, K.; Duić, N. Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 136, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Gamal, S.M.A.; Selim, F.A. Utilization of some industrial wastes for eco-friendly cement production. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2017, 12, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Cui, K.; Yang, Y.; Chang, J. Investigation on the preparation of low carbon cement materials from industrial solid waste phosphogypsum: Clinker preparation, cement properties, and hydration mechanism. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 452, 142203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, R.; Yan, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Jing, L. Microstructural characteristics of aluminosilicate minerals in cement clinker prepared from coal gangue, carbide slag, and desulfurization gypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 451, 138861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, T.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, P.; Cui, S.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, S. Utilization of copper tailings in the preparation of low-calcium Portland cement clinker and carbonation-hardening mechanism. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 457, 139362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.S.; Mohr, B.J. Comparison of eggshell powder blended cementitious materials with ASTM Type IL cement-based materials. Cement 2024, 17, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzeszczyk, S.; Kupka, T.; Kałamarz, A.; Sudoł, A.; Jurowski, K.; Makieieva, N.; Oleksowicz, K.; Wrzalik, R. Characterization of eggshell as limestone replacement and its influence on properties of modified cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 319, 126006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faridi, H.; Arabhosseini, A. Application of eggshell wastes as valuable and utilizable products: A review. Res. Agric. Eng. 2018, 64, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, D.A.; Benelli, P.; Amante, E.R. A literature review on adding value to solid residues: Egg shells. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 46, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Zhao, J.; Ahmad, W.; Amin, M.N.; Aslam, F.; Khan, K.; Ahmad, A. Potential use of waste eggshells in cement-based materials: A bibliographic analysis and review of the material properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 344, 128143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Xu, X.; Chen, E.; Fan, J.; Xiong, G. Properties of cement-based bricks with oyster-shells ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 91, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baláž, M. Ball milling of eggshell waste as a green and sustainable approach: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 256, 256–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paruthi, S.; Khan, A.H.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, F.; Hasan, M.A.; Magbool, H.M.; Manzar, M.S. Sustainable cement replacement using waste eggshells: A review on mechanical properties of eggshell concrete and strength prediction using artificial neural network. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e02160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamada, H.M.; Tayeh, B.A.; Al-Attar, A.; Yahaya, F.M.; Muthusamy, K.; Humada, A.M. The present state of the use of eggshell powder in concrete: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiferaw, N.; Habte, L.; Thenepalli, T.; Ahn, J.W. Effect of eggshell powder on the hydration of cement paste. Materials 2019, 12, 2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binici, H.; Aksogan, O.; Sevinc, A.H.; Cinpolat, E. Mechanical and radioactivity shielding performances of mortars made with cement, sand and egg shells. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 93, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pliya, P.; Cree, D. Limestone derived eggshell powder as a replacement in Portland cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zain, M.R.M.; Oh, C.L.; Lee, S.W. Investigations on rheological and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC) containing 0.6 μm eggshell as partial replacement of cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 303, 124539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Her, S.; Park, J.; Li, P.; Bae, S. Feasibility study on utilization of pulverized eggshell waste as an alternative to limestone in raw materials for Portland cement clinker production. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 324, 126589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terzić, A.; Pezo, L.; Mijatović, N.; Stojanović, J.; Kragović, M.; Miličić, L.; Andrić, L. The Effect of Alternations in Mineral Additives (Zeolite, Bentonite, Fly Ash) on Physico-chemical Behavior of Portland Cement Based Binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 180, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terzić, A.; Radulović, D.; Pezo, L.; Andrić, L.; Miličić, L.; Stojanović, J.; Grigorova, I. The effect of mechano-chemical activation and surface treatment of limestone filler on the properties of construction composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 117, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wesselsky, A.; Jensen, O.M. Synthesis of pure Portland cement phases. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zepper, J.C.O.; Van Der Laan, S.R.; Schollbach, K.; Brouwers, H.J.H. A Bogue approach applied to basic oxygen furnace slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 175, 107344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM C150/C150M-24; Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2024.
- EN 197-1: SRPS EN 197-1:2013; Cement-Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardization: Belgrade, Serbia, 2013.
- SRPS EN 1015-2:2008; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry-Part 2: Bulk Sampling of Mortars and Preparation of Test Mortars. European Committee for Standardization: Belgrade, Serbia, 2008.
- SRPS EN 1015-11:2019; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry-Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. European Committee for Standardization: Belgrade, Serbia, 2019.
- Sha, W.; O’Neill, E.A.; Guo, Z. Differential scanning calorimetry study of ordinary Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1487–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narasimhulu, K.; Gettu, R.; Babu, K.G. Beneficiation of Natural Zeolite through Flash Calcination for Its Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 26, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzal, M. TG and DTA Study of the Thermal Dehydration of Metal-exchanged Zeolite-4A Samples. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2000, 62, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zivica, V.; Palou, M.T. Physico-chemical characterization of thermally treated bentonite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2014, 68, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Önal, M.; Sarıkaya, Y. Thermal behavior of a bentonite. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007, 90, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubliha, M.; Trnovcová, V.; Ondruška, J.; Štubňa, I.; Bošák, O.; Kaljuvee, T. Comparison of dehydration in kaolin and illite using DC conductivity measurements. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 149, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.; Matalkah, F.; Darsanasiri, A.G.N.D.; Soroushian, P. Fluidized bed combustion coal fly ash: Comparative evaluation for potential use in alkali-activated binders. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2019, 42, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Húlan, T.; Štubňa, I. Young’s modulus of kaolinite-illite mixtures during firing. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 190, 105584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giergiczny, Z. Effect of some additives on the reactions in fly ASH-Ca(OH)2 system. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2004, 76, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakali, G.; Perraki, T.; Tsivilis, S.; Badogiannis, E. Thermal treatment of kaolin: The effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity. Appl. Clay Sci. 2001, 20, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cree, D.; Pliya, P. Effect of elevated temperature on eggshell, eggshell powder and eggshell powder mortars for masonry applications. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Wu, Y.; Xie, Z.; Li, Y.; Tang, W.; Yu, J. Calcium hydroxide recycled from waste eggshell resources for the effective recovery of fluoride from wastewater. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 28264–28278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toibah, A.R.; Misran, F.; Shaaban, A.; Mustafa, Z. Effect of pH condition during hydrothermal synthesis on the properties of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2019, 13, 4958–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakali, G.; Tsivilis, S.; Kolovos, K.; Voglis, N.; Aivaliotis, J.; Perraki, T.; Passialakou, E.; Stamatakis, M. Use of secondary mineralizing raw materials in cement production. A case study of a wolframite–stibnite ore. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2004, 27, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simoni, M.; Wilkes, M.D.; Brown, S.; Provis, J.L.; Kinoshita, H.; Hanein, T. Decarbonising the lime industry: State-of-the-art. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 168, 112765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shen, X.; Tang, M.; Li, X. Stability of tricalcium silicate and other primary phases in portland cement clinker. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 1954–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simoni, M.; Hanein, T.; Duvallet, T.Y.; Jewell, R.B.; Provis, J.L.; Kinoshita, H. Producing cement clinker assemblages in the system: CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-SO3-CaCl2-MgO. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 144, 106418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravaszová, S.; Dvořák, K. Development of crystallinity of triclinic polymorph of tricalcium silicate. Materials 2020, 13, 3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahhou, M.; Hamidi, A.E.; Moussaouiti, M.E.; Arshad, M.A. Synthesis and characterization of belite clinker by sustainable utilization of alumina sludge and natural fluorite (CaF2). Materialia 2021, 20, 101204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stemmermann, P.; Ullrich, A.; Beuchle, G.; Garbev, K.; Schweike, U. Belite cement clinker from autoclaved aerated concrete waste—A contribution towards CO2-reduced circular building materials. Ce/Papers 2022, 5, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courtial, M.; Noirfontaine, M.; Dunstetter, F.; Gasecki, G.; Signes-Frehel, M. Polymorphism of tricalcium silicate in Portland cement: A fast visual identification of structure and superstructure. Powder Diffr. 2003, 18, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Lee, S.W.; Rho, H.T.; Kim, S. Hydration and microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate depending on ratio between di- and tricalcium silicates. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2021, 19, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirsch, T.; Matschei, T.; Stephan, D. The hydration of tricalcium aluminate (Ca3Al2O6) in Portland cement-related systems: A review. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 168, 107150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, S.; Feng, P.; Liu, J. Dissolution and early hydration of tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4AF) in water and in aqueous sulfate solutions. Cem. Concr. Res. 2024, 186, 107676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagao, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Jin, Y.; Maruyama, I.; Hibino, T. Ionic conductive and photocatalytic properties of cementitious materials: Calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminoferrite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 15157–15166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouchenafa, O.; Hamzaoui, R.; Florence, C.; Mansoutre, S. Cement and clinker production by indirect mechanosynthesis process. Constr. Mater. 2022, 2, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csáki, Š.; Štubňa, I.; Dobroň, P.; Minárik, P.; Záleská, M.; Václavů, T.; Vozár, L. Influence of mechanical treatment on thermophysical processes in illitic clay during firing. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 141, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mejdoub, R.; Hammi, H.; Khitouni, M.; Suñol, J.J.; M’nif, A. The effect of prolonged mechanical activation duration on the reactivity of Portland cement: Effect of particle size and crystallinity changes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Lothenbach, B.; Moon, J. Performance improvement of Portland-limestone cement by mechanochemical activation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 176, 107411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Lu, S.; Tang, M.; Ding, J.; Buekens, A.; Yang, J.; Qiu, Q.; Yan, J. Mechanical activation of fly ash from MSWI for utilization in cementitious materials. Waste Manag. 2019, 88, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hughes, T.L.; Methven, C.M.; Jones, T.G.J.; Pelham, S.E.; Fletcher, P.; Hall, C. Determining cement composition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 1995, 2, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horgnies, M.; Chen, J.J.; Bouillon, C. Overview about the use of Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy to study cementitious materials. WIT Trans. Eng. Sci. 2013, 1, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isernia, L.F. FTIR study of the relation, between extra-framework aluminum species and the adsorbed molecular water, and its effect on the acidity in ZSM-5 steamed zeolite. Mater. Res. 2013, 16, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Shi, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, M.; Ma, L. Structure Regulation of Bentonite-Alginate nanocomposites for controlled release of imidacloprid. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10068–10076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jozanikohan, G.; Abarghooei, M.N. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis for the clay mineralogy studies in a clastic reservoir. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2022, 12, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.K.; Shrivastava, S. A study on the viability of fly ash and construction and demolition waste as geopolymerized masonry mortar and their comparative analysis. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 32, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.S.; Jahan, S.A.; Ahmed, S. Crystallographic characterization of bio-waste material originated CaCO3, green-synthesized CaO and Ca(OH)2. Results Chem. 2023, 5, 100822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzaoui, R.; Bouchenafa, O. Equivalent Cement Clinker Obtained by Indirect Mechanosynthesis Process. Materials 2020, 13, 5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Król, M.; Koleżyński, A.; Florek, P.; Jeleń, P.; Kozień, D.; Mozgawa, W. Full spectroscopic characterization of clinker minerals (anhydrous cement). J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1255, 132454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, G.-B.; Chen, S.-F.; Liu, L.; Jiang, J.; Yao, H.-B.; Xu, A.-W.; Yu, S.-H. 1,3-Diamino-2-hydroxypropane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate: Nucleation, transformation and crystal growth. CrystEngComm 2009, 12, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timón, V.; Torrens-Martin, D.; Fernández-Carrasco, L.J.; Martínez-Ramírez, S. Infrared and Raman vibrational modelling of β-C2S and C3S compounds. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 169, 107162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Carrasco, L.; Torrens-Martín, D.; Morales, L.M.; Martínez-Ramírez, S. Infrared Spectroscopy in the Analysis of Building and Construction Materials; InTech eBooks: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stutzman, P. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of hydraulic cement microstructure. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2004, 26, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdoğan, S.T.; Nie, X.; Stutzman, P.E.; Garboczi, E.J. Micrometer-scale 3-D shape characterization of eight cements: Particle shape and cement chemistry, and the effect of particle shape on laser diffraction particle size measurement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokol, E.V.; Kokh, S.N.; Vapnik, Y.; Thiery, V.; Korzhova, S.A. Natural analogs of belite sulfoaluminate cement clinkers from Negev Desert, Israel. Am. Mineral. 2014, 99, 1471–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Li, J.; Lu, Z.; Ng, S.; Niu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xu, Y.; Lai, Z.; Liu, H. The role of Brownmillerite in preparation of High-Belite Sulfoaluminate cement Clinker. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kása, E.; Szabó, Y.; Szabados, M.; Kukovecz, Á.; Kónya, Z.; Sipos, P.; Kutus, B. The neutralization of tricalcium aluminate hexahydrate and its spontaneous transformation into Friedel’s salt, a layered double hydroxide. Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 177, 107414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Ren, Q.; He, J.; Jiang, S.; Cheng, X.; Yu, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, M. New understanding of early hydration of C4AF under surface vitrification. Powder Technol. 2020, 377, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babalola, B.M.; Wilson, L.D. Valorization of Eggshell as Renewable Materials for Sustainable Biocomposite Adsorbents—An Overview. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aditya, S.; Stephen, J.; Radhakrishnan, M. Utilization of eggshell waste in calcium-fortified foods and other industrial applications: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gacem, A.; Yadav, K.K.; Tabassum, Z.; Thajudeen, K.Y.; Ahmed, M.M.; Laeliocattleya, R.A.; Khamidah, A.; Antarlina, S.S.; Alreshidi, M.A.; Aldosari, F.M.; et al. Valorization of eggshell waste as sustainable mechanical reinforcement in biodegradable bio-packaging materials. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 23, 102273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Amin, M.N.; Khan, K.; Nazar, S.; Gamil, Y.; Najeh, T. Comparing the efficacy of GEP and MEP algorithms in predicting concrete strength incorporating waste eggshell and waste glass powder. Dev. Built Environ. 2024, 17, 100361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Raw Material | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | Fe2O3 (%) | CaO (%) | MgO (%) | K2O (%) | Na2O (%) | SO3 (%) | LoI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz sand | 99.50 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | 0.16 |
| KI clay | 57.74 | 28.67 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 1.14 | 2.44 | 0.57 | 0.02 | 7.67 |
| Zeolite | 63.14 | 11.32 | 1.94 | 3.99 | 2.38 | 1.67 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 14.87 |
| Bentonite | 47.87 | 14.6 | 4.28 | 3.74 | 4.27 | 0.54 | 2.57 | 1.11 | 21.02 |
| Fly ash | 58.32 | 18.18 | 6.75 | 8.71 | 2.20 | 1.16 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 4.16 |
| Fe-slag | 10.91 | 4.19 | 59.78 | 12.19 | 1.48 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.43 | 10.79 |
| Limestone | 3.87 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 52.55 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.20 | - | 42.42 |
| Eggshell | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 54.05 | 0.54 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.4 | 44.70 |
| Raw Material | Density (kg/m3) | D10 (µm) | D50 (µm) | D90 (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz sand | 2670 | 1.34 | 13.75 | 19.95 |
| KI clay | 2770 | 0.83 | 12.27 | 17.40 |
| Zeolite | 2380 | 0.81 | 12.35 | 18.00 |
| Bentonite | 2710 | 0.85 | 12.10 | 17.89 |
| Fly ash | 2450 | 0.87 | 12.22 | 17.90 |
| Fe-slag | 3000 | 1.51 | 17.05 | 22.23 |
| Limestone | 2560 | 0.71 | 11.10 | 17.10 |
| Eggshell | 2530 | 0.65 | 10.75 | 16.98 |
| Componential Material | C-EC | C-EB | C-EZ | C-EF | C-LC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz sand | 10 wt. % | 10 wt. % | 8 wt. % | 10 wt. % | 11 wt. % |
| KI clay | 7 wt. % | 7 wt. % | |||
| Zeolite | 11 wt. % | ||||
| Bentonite | 10 wt. % | ||||
| Fly ash | 8 wt. % | ||||
| Fe-slag | 4 wt. % | 3 wt. % | 3 wt. % | 3 wt. % | 3 wt. % |
| Limestone | 79 wt. % | ||||
| Eggshell | 79 wt. % | 77 wt. % | 78 wt. % | 79 wt. % |
| Location of FTIR Reflection No. x (cm−1); x = 1–9 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak Point | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| C-EC | 3630 | 1492 | 1475 | 900 | 840 | 786 | 560 | 498 | 470 |
| C-EC10 | 3630 | 1495 | 1475 | 900 | 840 | 780 | 560 | 498 | 472 |
| C-EC20 | - | 1495 | - | - | 869 | 786 | - | 500 | 475 |
| C-EC30 | - | 1492 | - | - | 869 | 783 | - | 500 | - |
| C-EB | 3640 | 1497 | - | 910 | 832 | 787 | 560 | 498 | 470 |
| C-EB10 | 3640 | 1497 | - | 910 | 832 | 786 | 560 | 498 | 470 |
| C-EB20 | - | - | - | 910 | 831 | 789 | 560 | 500 | 470 |
| C-EB30 | - | - | - | 910 | 832 | 787 | 560 | 500 | 470 |
| C-EZ | 3650 | 1498 | - | 890 | 830 | 790 | 560 | 500 | 470 |
| C-EZ10 | - | 1496 | - | 900 | 830 | 790 | 560 | 500 | 468 |
| C-EZ20 | - | 1498 | - | 910 | 830 | 790 | - | 500 | 468 |
| C-EZ30 | - | 1498 | - | 920 | 830 | 790 | - | 500 | 470 |
| C-EF | 3650 | 1490 | - | 900 | 830 | 786 | 560 | 498 | 468 |
| C-EF10 | 3650 | 1492 | - | - | 850 | 790 | - | 500 | 470 |
| C-EF20 | - | - | - | - | 855 | 790 | - | 500 | 472 |
| C-EF30 | - | - | - | - | 850 | 790 | - | 502 | 474 |
| C-LC | 3640 | 1488 | - | 900 | 840 | 790 | 560 | 485 | 470 |
| C-LC10 | - | 1492 | - | 900 | 840 | 790 | 560 | 499 | 470 |
| C-LC20 | - | 1493 | - | 900 | 840 | 792 | 560 | 499 | 470 |
| C-LC30 | - | 1494 | - | 901 | 840 | 792 | 560 | 500 | 471 |
| Band | Al-OH | C-O | C-O | Si-O Al-O | Si-O Al-O | Si-O Al-O Fe-O | O-Si-O | Si-O Al-O | Si-O |
| Element | At. No. | Mass (%) | Mass Norm (%) | Atom (%) | Abs. Error (%) | Rel. Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-EF (Figure 9) | ||||||
| Ca | 20 | 44.07 | 33.16 | 17.43 | 0.52 | 1.18 |
| Fe | 26 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 1.19 |
| Al | 13 | 1.10 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2.81 |
| Si | 14 | 9.37 | 7.05 | 5.29 | 0.22 | 2.33 |
| O | 8 | 76.43 | 57.50 | 75.74 | 3.65 | 4.77 |
| C-LC (Figure S9) | ||||||
| Ca | 20 | 42.79 | 32.55 | 17.22 | 0.50 | 1.17 |
| Fe | 26 | 6.44 | 4.90 | 1.86 | 0.08 | 1.17 |
| Al | 13 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.02 | 2.81 |
| Si | 14 | 3.52 | 2.68 | 2.02 | 0.08 | 2.32 |
| O | 8 | 77.62 | 59.05 | 78.25 | 3.68 | 4.74 |
| C-EF10 (Figure 10) | ||||||
| Ca | 20 | 49.52 | 35.43 | 18.82 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Fe | 26 | 1.73 | 1.24 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 1.38 |
| Al | 13 | 1.20 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.03 | 2.92 |
| Si | 14 | 6.83 | 4.88 | 3.70 | 0.16 | 2.35 |
| O | 8 | 79.55 | 56.90 | 75.74 | 3.90 | 4.90 |
| C-LC10 (Figure S10) | ||||||
| Ca | 20 | 47.74 | 35.31 | 18.70 | 0.57 | 1.20 |
| Fe | 26 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 1.87 |
| Al | 13 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 3.29 |
| Si | 14 | 9.29 | 6.87 | 5.19 | 0.22 | 2.34 |
| O | 8 | 77.04 | 56.61 | 75.61 | 3.78 | 4.91 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Terzić, A.; Filipović, S.; Tadić, A.P.; Živojinović, J.; Jelić, I.N.; Obradović, N.; Fahrenholtz, W.G. Evaluating the Integration of Bio-based Waste into Cement Production: A Pathway to Sustainable Building. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104959
Terzić A, Filipović S, Tadić AP, Živojinović J, Jelić IN, Obradović N, Fahrenholtz WG. Evaluating the Integration of Bio-based Waste into Cement Production: A Pathway to Sustainable Building. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104959
Chicago/Turabian StyleTerzić, Anja, Suzana Filipović, Adriana Peleš Tadić, Jelena Živojinović, Ivana N. Jelić, Nina Obradović, and William G. Fahrenholtz. 2026. "Evaluating the Integration of Bio-based Waste into Cement Production: A Pathway to Sustainable Building" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104959
APA StyleTerzić, A., Filipović, S., Tadić, A. P., Živojinović, J., Jelić, I. N., Obradović, N., & Fahrenholtz, W. G. (2026). Evaluating the Integration of Bio-based Waste into Cement Production: A Pathway to Sustainable Building. Sustainability, 18(10), 4959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104959

