Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Transitions and Context-Dependent Drivers of Sustainable Urban–Rural Coordination in China: Evidence from New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization
Previous Article in Journal
The Sustainable Impact of Coal Mining on Water Utilization Efficiency in the Shengli Mining Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Greening the BRICS: Uncovering the Impact of Green Energy, Green Technology and Forest Cover on Environmental Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Considering the Joint Site Selection of Electric Logistics Vehicle Charging and Swapping Stations at Three Efficiency Levels

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chongqing Three Gorges University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 400000, China
2
Research and Development Department, Chongqing Hangying Automobile Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4817; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104817
Submission received: 30 March 2026 / Revised: 24 April 2026 / Accepted: 26 April 2026 / Published: 12 May 2026

Abstract

The growing penetration of electric logistics vehicles (ELVs) poses a significant challenge to electric utility site selection. This paper addresses the problem of joint site selection for electric logistics vehicle charging and swapping stations (CSSs). First, a joint site selection model is introduced to characterize the problem, and an improved genetic algorithm (IGA) is designed to solve this model. Derived from the standard genetic algorithm (SGA), the IGA incorporates local search operations, evolutionary inversion operations, and an elitist preservation strategy to enhance performance. On this basis, small-scale numerical simulations are conducted to determine the optimal parameters, thereby guaranteeing optimal algorithmic efficiency. Subsequently, large-scale numerical simulations are performed, with key indicators recorded including the optimal routing length, battery replenishment frequency, number of stations, number of ELVs, and solution time. Finally, analysis across three efficiency levels demonstrates that joint siting improves distribution efficiency by 39.38%, increases grid electricity sales by 46.89%, and reduces total transportation costs by 26.28%, with the optimization scheme validated across six different numerical scenarios. Overall, the joint site selection proposed in this paper has enhanced the benefits of relevant stakeholders and provided a reference for building a low-carbon transportation chain.
Keywords: electric logistics vehicles; charging station; swapping station; improved genetic algorithm; three efficiency levels electric logistics vehicles; charging station; swapping station; improved genetic algorithm; three efficiency levels

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Dai, N.; Zou, X. Considering the Joint Site Selection of Electric Logistics Vehicle Charging and Swapping Stations at Three Efficiency Levels. Sustainability 2026, 18, 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104817

AMA Style

Li J, Cai L, Wang Y, Liu Y, Dai N, Zou X. Considering the Joint Site Selection of Electric Logistics Vehicle Charging and Swapping Stations at Three Efficiency Levels. Sustainability. 2026; 18(10):4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Junting, Li Cai, Yichen Wang, Yuhang Liu, Nina Dai, and Xiaojiang Zou. 2026. "Considering the Joint Site Selection of Electric Logistics Vehicle Charging and Swapping Stations at Three Efficiency Levels" Sustainability 18, no. 10: 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104817

APA Style

Li, J., Cai, L., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Dai, N., & Zou, X. (2026). Considering the Joint Site Selection of Electric Logistics Vehicle Charging and Swapping Stations at Three Efficiency Levels. Sustainability, 18(10), 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop