This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Blockchain Adoption Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chains Under Different Leadership Structures and Asymmetric Market Shares
by
Ruiqing Li
Ruiqing Li 1
,
Yaodong Ni
Yaodong Ni 1,* and
Haoruo Zhu
Haoruo Zhu 2
1
School of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, University of International Business and Economics, 10 Huixin East Street, Beijing 100029, China
2
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 350; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010350 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 November 2025
/
Revised: 25 December 2025
/
Accepted: 26 December 2025
/
Published: 29 December 2025
Abstract
Many manufacturers operate dual-channel supply chains, selling through both direct online and reselling channels, with market shares that are generally asymmetric. At the same time, consumers increasingly demand trustworthy traceability information. Although traceability systems based on blockchain technology (TSBT) can meet this demand, they require substantial investment, making large manufacturers or powerful retailers more likely to lead TSBT adoption. This paper investigates how different leadership structures (manufacturer leadership vs. retailer leadership) and asymmetric market shares influence blockchain adoption strategies. This study reveals that under retailer leadership, blockchain adoption occurs once consumer preference for blockchain-based traceability information (hereafter, consumer preference) in the reselling channel exceeds a threshold, increasing profits for both supply chain members. Under manufacturer leadership, adoption depends on consumer preference in the reselling channel, the initial market share of the reselling channel, and the intensity of channel competition, generally benefiting the manufacturer but potentially harming the retailer. Comparing equilibrium results across leadership structures reveals that blockchain is more likely to be adopted under manufacturer leadership, which may yield higher profits for both members.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Li, R.; Ni, Y.; Zhu, H.
Blockchain Adoption Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chains Under Different Leadership Structures and Asymmetric Market Shares. Sustainability 2026, 18, 350.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010350
AMA Style
Li R, Ni Y, Zhu H.
Blockchain Adoption Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chains Under Different Leadership Structures and Asymmetric Market Shares. Sustainability. 2026; 18(1):350.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010350
Chicago/Turabian Style
Li, Ruiqing, Yaodong Ni, and Haoruo Zhu.
2026. "Blockchain Adoption Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chains Under Different Leadership Structures and Asymmetric Market Shares" Sustainability 18, no. 1: 350.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010350
APA Style
Li, R., Ni, Y., & Zhu, H.
(2026). Blockchain Adoption Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chains Under Different Leadership Structures and Asymmetric Market Shares. Sustainability, 18(1), 350.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010350
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.