Next Article in Journal
Advancing Sustainable Agriculture Through Digital Technology: The Role of the ‘Agricultural Guide’ App in Improving Olive Farming Practices in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Spatial Differentiation Pattern of High-Temperature Disaster Resilience and Strategies for Enhancing Resilience: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Addressing Challenges for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Solutions Using Extremophile Microorganisms

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
2
Institute of Environmental Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, G.T Road, Staff Houses Engineering University Lahore, Lahore 39161, Pakistan
3
Department of Physics, Punjab Engineering College, Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
4
School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(6), 2339; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062339
Submission received: 24 December 2024 / Revised: 24 February 2025 / Accepted: 5 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Treatment, Waste Valorization and Environment Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The pressure on the environment from wastewater has been increasing in line with industrialization and urbanization, thus calling for better and eco-friendly solutions for wastewater treatment. Extremophilic microorganisms, which can grow in extreme conditions including high salinity, acidity, and temperature, can be applied in wastewater bioremediation. This review assesses the various functions of extremophiles, halophiles, thermophiles, alkaliphiles, and acidophiles in the treatment of organic and inorganic pollutants. They are capable of catabolizing a wide range of hazardous chemicals, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phenolic compounds, and heavy metals. Moreover, extremophilic microalgae, like Galdieria sulphuraria, have been effective in nutrient removal, biosorption of heavy metals, and pollutant conversion into valuable biomass. This dual-functioning, therefore, helps not only in wastewater treatment but also in the production of biofuel and biofertilizer, making the process cost-effective. The use of extremophiles in biofilm reactors improves pollutant removal, with less energy input. Extremophilic microorganisms can, therefore, be used to revolutionize wastewater management by providing green solutions to current treatment approaches. This review discusses the existing drawbacks of wastewater treatment along with the additional requirements needed to enhance the capability of bioremediation and potential future research.

1. Introduction

The increasing population of the world, intertwined with intensive agriculture and swift industrial expansion, has led to a marked surge in urban wastewater, presenting a serious environmental challenge to mankind. Many developing countries grapple with a lack of drinking water, often stemming from subpar wastewater treatment or the discharge of hazardous effluents into the rivers [1]. However, according to a WHO report, 2.2 billion people could not access clean drinking water in 2022, especially in countries with dense populations, like India, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, which face alarming issues related to access to clean drinking water due to inadequate wastewater treatment and the discharge of hazardous effluents [2]. Water bodies near urban and industrial zones are often contaminated with a blend of organic and inorganic matter, including micropollutants, heavy metals, and an excess of nutrients, arising from industrial, agricultural, and residential waste [3,4]. Wastewater from various sources carries a plethora of contaminants, ranging from industrial by-products and pathogens to heavy metals and pesticides, each with well-documented effects on human health [5]. The use of fertilizers and pesticides poses another significant source of contamination. In urban areas, commercial activities, mining operations, and waste disposal sites further contribute to the global wastewater burden [6]. This results in waterborne diseases, such as diarrhea, which account for approximately 1 million deaths per annum, and Shigellosis causes the deaths of 150,000 individuals each year [7].
For wastewater treatment, various physical and chemical methods are used. Among these methods, reverse osmosis [8,9], UV disinfection [10,11], and coagulant methods [12] are widespread. During reverse osmosis, a membrane filtration is used that operates by exerting pressure to force water through a semi-permeable membrane [13]. This method effectively removes contaminants, such as dissolved salts and organic matter [14]. In contrast, the coagulant method uses different chemical coagulants, such as aluminum sulfate [15] and iron salts [16], for water treatment. The UV method is a chemical-free disinfection technique that inactivates many microorganisms, though its effectiveness can be reduced by water turbidity [17].
Apart from these, biological methods, such as the activated sludge process [18,19], biological nutrient removal [20,21,22,23], and the membrane bioreactor [24], play an important role in wastewater treatment. The activated sludge process involves proper aeration in order to mix microbes and facilitate the breakdown of organic matter [18]. However, biological nutrient removal targets the reduction of nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorus, in wastewater using microbes [25,26]. It prevents nutrient pollution by converting nitrogen compounds into nitrogen gas and phosphorus in order to precipitate. However, the membrane bioreactor incorporates biological treatment with membrane filtration for enhanced solid–liquid separation [24]. Microorganisms treat wastewater in a biological reactor and membranes help to separate solids from treated water. The wastewater is released from industries creating extreme conditions, such as high salt concentration and low pH [27,28,29]. To counter this, extremophilic microbes are effective, because these microbes can survive in extreme physiochemical conditions [30]. The extremophiles have the property of efficacy in addressing different types of wastewater, ranging from industrial effluents to agricultural runoff. Their unique metabolic pathways and enzymatic activities allow them to enzymatically transform or degrade pollutants [31]. There are different types of extremophiles, such as acidophiles, alkaliphiles, halophiles and thermophiles, which are considered effective in bioremediation [29,32].
These extremophiles, through their highly specialized metabolic functions, play a pivotal role in the remediation of contaminated water bodies by breaking down and transforming specific pollutants into less harmful or non-toxic forms. Halomonas species and other extremophiles show special metabolic functions that help them survive harsh conditions while they clean up pollution. These microorganisms produce specialized enzymes that withstand high salt levels and assist in breaking down organic contaminants, such as hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents. By synthesizing exopolysaccharides and metal-binding proteins, these microbes help neutralize heavy metals from the environment as they trap hazardous metals, like lead, cadmium and chromium. These microbes protect their cell processes by making compatible solutes, including ectoine and trehalose, which keeps them working in salt-heavy environments. The special ways in which extremophiles process materials make them essential for treating saltwater waste and environmental toxins under tough conditions.
For instance, extremophiles thriving in saline environments, such as Halomonas spp., demonstrate remarkable potential in treating saline wastewater. These microorganisms possess unique enzymatic pathways and physiological adaptations that enable them to tolerate high salt concentrations while metabolizing organic pollutants, heavy metals, or other hazardous substances typically found in such environments [33]. This effectively reduces the concentration of dissolved salts, such as cadmium, zinc, lead, nickel, and associated contaminants [33]. Industrial mining is the producer of highly acidic wastewater. For treatment, Acidithiobacillus is an acidophilic bacteria capable of oxidizing sulfur compounds. Furthermore, the ability to oxidize sulfide minerals and generate acidity can contribute to the remediation of acidic mine waters [34,35].Alkaliphilic bacteria, like Natronobacterium and Thioalkalivibrio spp., treat wastewater by breaking down organic pollutants, oxidizing sulfur compounds, and facilitating ammonia removal under high-pH conditions. They also precipitate heavy metals by altering pH, making them effective in remediating industrial effluents [36,37,38].
Among industrial wastewaters, palm oil mill effluents are a significant source of concentrated organic toxic and nitrogenous compounds. The pollution from palm oil mill effluents needs special treatment methods because these liquids contain high levels of organic and nitrogenous chemicals. Ferroplasma acidiphilum and Ferroplasma acidarmanus species excel at cleaning harmful substances in acidic wastewater environments. Their special metabolic properties, such as iron processing and the capacity to break down complex organic materials, make them perfect for treating POME and similar wastewater effluents. These microbes show us how to handle industrial wastewater with difficult chemical properties [37]
The genus Ferroplasma has demonstrated excellent potential in degrading these pollutants. Species like Ferroplasma acidiphilum and Ferroplasma acidarmanus are particularly effective in treating acidic wastewater environments, making them promising candidates for the remediation of such industrial effluents [39].
On the other hand, Galdieria sulphuraria has a natural tolerance against high temperatures and hot climates [40]. This genus has been reportedly used for treating municipal wastewater using the hydrothermal liquefaction method [32,41]. Moreover, Dunaliella salina, Galdieria sulphuraria, Cyanidium caldarium, and Chlorobium tepidum are examples of microalga that have been used in the treatment of wastewater [42,43,44].
In this review, we discuss the potential of extremophiles to survive in extreme conditions and explore their applications in the treatment of wastewater from diverse sources. Our hypothesis suggests that extremophiles, with their unique adaptations to extreme conditions, offer promising prospects for efficient, low-energy, and sustainable wastewater treatment strategies. This review, through a comprehensive analysis, aims to shed light on the multifaceted roles of extremophiles, addressing their survival capabilities and their relevance in contemporary wastewater treatment practices.

2. Methodology

2.1. Literature Search and Data Collection

Research over the last 50 years (1973 to 2023) is discussed on the utilization of extremophilic microorganisms for wastewater treatment. A systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus. Search terms were “extremophiles”, “wastewater bioremediation”, “halophiles”, “thermophiles”, “alkaliphiles”, “acidophiles”, and “microalgae in wastewater treatment”. These were chosen to reflect studies of the adaptation mechanism, metabolic pathways, and biotechnological applications of extremophiles in the treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater.
Moreover, studies of biodegradation of organic pollutants by extremophiles, the removal of heavy metals from wastewater, and overall purification by extremophiles constituted the inclusion criteria. Studies that were not concerned with wastewater treatment, or which did not offer experimental data on extremophilic application, were excluded. We then analyzed trends in keywords, publication volume, country contributions, and collaborative research networks by applying this refined dataset.

2.2. Data Analysis and Visualization

Major research themes and their relationships were identified using keyword co-occurrence analysis performed using the VOS viewer software (Version 1.6.20), R studios and Excel. In Figure 1, we proved that the terms ’wastewater treatment’, ’microbial community’, and ’bioreactor’ were at the center of the network, implying that the body of publications in this field is themed together. In addition, we identified distinct groups of bacterioplankton associated with extremophilic adaptations (e.g., halophiles, thermophiles) or operational parameters (e.g., chemical oxygen demand, temperature). Insights into focus areas in extremophilic wastewater bioremediation were obtained from this approach.
Data from the publications were also analyzed to identify the leading institutions, countries, and primary published journals within the field. As seen in Figure 2, the major affiliations are Wageningen University, leading with 52 affiliations, followed by Chongqing University at 47, and Aalborg University at 40, which contribute most of the publications in this research area.
Figure 3 presents the process of scientific production, which is the process of generating, disseminating, and using scientific information. It includes a range of elements, such as financing, authorship, and research impact, and shows the geographic distribution of publications, in which China, the United States, Japan, and Korea are among the top countries in publication volume due to their industrial applications and regional environmental needs. China leads the list with 732 publications followed by Japan with 331, USA with 305 and South Korea with a 189.

2.3. Geographic and Institutional Contribution to Research

A citation analysis was performed to evaluate research impact and collaboration. China, Germany, and Japan emerged as the most frequently cited countries in this field (see Figure 4). China demonstrated a high publication output and significant citation impact, which has grown steadily since 2015, reflecting the country’s investments in environmental biotechnology. China led with 4153 citations, followed by Germany with 3037 and Japan with 2979.
Figure 5 shows that the publications have been categorized into single country publications (SCP) and multiple country publications (MCP). Strong SCP output was observed in the United States, Japan and Korea; it is believed that European countries, like Germany and the Netherlands, use a high proportion of MCPs pointing towards active international collaboration in research.

2.4. Analysis of Publication Trends in the Time

Temporal publication trends (Figure 6) are analyzed to understand the evolution of research interest in extremophilic wastewater treatment, revealing a significant number of publications in recent years, primarily from China. The increasing upward trend, on the other hand, is indicative of the shift in global perspective towards sustainable and innovative strategies in wastewater management, against rising environmental pressures.

3. Extremophilic Microorganisms in Wastewater Treatment

Extremophilic microbes survive under very harsh conditions. They are generally found in environments that are unfavorable for most life forms, including high salinity, low pH, high temperature, and acidic areas. These are of different types, i.e., halophiles, alkaliphiles, thermophiles, and acidophiles. Extremophiles are considered a possible source of wastewater bioremediation due to their specificity and versatility [45]. There are some extremophilic algae which can degrade numerous pollutants, such as organic material and heavy metals due to their exceptionally high metabolism and adaptability, hence making them valuable options in wastewater treatment [44]. The subsequent sections consist of a description of the various categories of extremophiles and their relation to wastewater treatment.

3.1. Acidophilic Microorganisms

Acidophiles are a major group of extremophiles that naturally thrive in low-pH environments. They are categorized based on their optimal pH. There are four classes of acidophiles: (i) extreme acidophilic organisms that effectively grow at a pH < 3, (ii) moderate acidophilic organisms that grow at a pH range of 3–5, (iii) acid-tolerant species that can tolerate pH conditions > 5 and (iv) hyper-acidophilic organisms that thrive in environments with a pH close to or below 1 [46]. Some characteristic mechanisms enable acidophilic microorganisms to survive in very acidic conditions. They have highly impermeable cell membranes to prevent further influx of protons into the cell and transporters that expel the excess protons present within the cell. Moreover, acidophiles carry buffering chaperone proteins within the cytoplasm to protect their DNA and proteins from acidic environments. Many acidophiles possess flagella with which to move in response to chemical signals and can form biofilms to enhance survival in acidic environments [47] (Figure 7). Aside from their ecological versatility, acidophiles are characterized into different types, like chemosynthetic or photosynthetic depending on the light intensity (Galdieria sulphuraria or Cyanidium caldarium), heterotrophic, which metabolize organic chemicals (Acidiphilium and Leptospirillum), and lithotrophic, which are dependent on an inorganic compound as carbon source (Acidithiobacillus species) [47].
Acidic pH is widely varied in both natural and anthropogenic environments [48]. Acidophiles are frequently found in geothermal sulfur-rich acidic environments, e.g., Acidianus sulfidivorans from Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea, Sulfolobus solfataricus from Yellowstone National Park, and Sulfolobus hakonensis from Hakone, Japan, but they also thrive in human-made environments, such as acid mine drainage (AMD).
Conversely, human activities, such as mining operations and industrial processes, contribute considerably to the development of acidic environments. In abandoned mines, microbial activity leading to the dissolution of pyrites and other sulfides results in significant amounts of AMD. Such metal-rich, acidic drainage is a major contributor of water pollution [49]. These waters cannot support most life forms, but acidophilic microorganisms can thrive in such environments. Acidophilic microorganisms are adapted to a low pH environment and have a narrow range of substrates. The rate of growth is slow and they are generally sensitive to changes in pH; thus, any significant change in pH can result in reduced activity or even the death of the microbes. In some wastewater, toxic compounds or heavy metals may inhibit the growth of these microorganisms. Some metals, such as copper or lead, when present at excessively high levels can prove toxic to these microorganisms [50]. Optimal operating conditions for acidophilic microorganisms are often specific and hard to achieve, particularly in large-scale treatment plants. Hybrid systems can integrate acidophilic microorganisms with other types of microorganisms in a multi-stage treatment process; thereby, the spectrum of pollutants can be degraded over a range of pH values. For instance, in a two-stage system, acidic waste could be handled by acidophilic microorganisms, while neutral or basic components could be treated by other microorganisms. Advanced hybrid systems could be defined by their significant use of advanced monitoring and control technologies to manage environmental conditions for acidophilic and other microbial species involved in the treatment process [51]. These sensors, for example, might monitor pH, temperature, and oxygen levels, and real-time feedback loops could utilize these parameters to maintain optimal environmental conditions [52].
These microorganisms display wide physiological and phylogenetic diversity across bacteria, archaea, fungi, and the alga Chlamydomonas acidophila. Examples include Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Acidithrix ferrooxidans, Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum, Acidiphilium, Acidocella, Acidicaldus, and Acidomonas [53,54,55,56,57].

3.1.1. Acidophilic Microorganisms for Organic Wastewater

Acidophilic bacteria have an excellent ability to degrade numerous organic pollutants present in the acidic environment. They contain specialized metabolic systems that degrade toxic chemicals, like phenol, benzene, and toluene, into less harmful by-products. The research in [58,59] discussed an acidophilic bacteria, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, that can break down polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are harmful organic compounds found in coal tar and petroleum [60], also confirming that this strain has the ability to biodegrade low and high molecular weight PAHs, such as anthracene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, pyrene, and benzo (e) pyrene at a pH of 2 [59].
Acidophiles are highly effective at degrading phenol and its derivatives, which are abundant in nature, having a carcinogenic property. The authors of [61] have described acidophilic yeast strains, such as Rhodotorula, which are used for the partial degradation of phenol. [62]. Moreover, [62] obtained a Zymomonas mobilis 1 (ZM1) strain from areas endemic for AMD, observing that ZM1 reduced phenol concentration by up to 1100 mg/L within 120 h, with a pH of 3 [62]. Similarly, the archaeon strain Sulfolobus solfataricus 98/2 works effectively at high temperature of 80 °C and a low pH of 3.2. It quickly metabolizes phenol into biomass and CO2 [63].
Acidocella species, such as WJB-3, play a role in wastewater treatment. They use the aliphatic hydrocarbons as a carbon source [64]. The yeast Candida digboiensis TERI ASN6 in oily sludge-polluted soils can grow and degrade n-alkanes in the presence of TPH in media with a pH of 3.0 [65]. Due to this property, they are used in oil-polluted acidic territories to detoxify oil pollution.
Currently, advanced genetic engineering of acidophiles has contributed to optimizing wastewater treatment and neutralization processes. Researchers have genetically modified Pseudomonas putida S16 strains to produce genes for glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and irrigator E (IrrE) to enhance the efficiency of wastewater treatment [66]. These strains can decrease concentrations of nicotine and benzoate by up to 50% over 2 days of treatment at a pH of 5 [66]. Many acidophile species contribute to the biodegradation of a wide range of organic pollutants, including phenols, PAHs, and hydrocarbons, as discussed in Table 1.

3.1.2. Acidophilic Microorganisms for Inorganic Wastewater

It has been found that acidophilic microbes can be useful in the removal of solid inorganic pollutants. These organisms can detoxify and eliminate heavy metals from wastewater (Table 2).
Acidophiles primarily incorporate strategies to remove heavy metal toxicity [78]. They can dissolve and effectively precipitate the solids separated from wastewater containing heavy metals, converting them into insoluble forms. In this course, ferric iron undergoes reduction to ferrous iron, followed by the precipitation of metal hydroxides and sulfides [79]. For example, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are bacteria that are mainly involved in the oxidation of ferrous iron, which results in the formation of a non-tangible compound called ferric hydroxide. Since iron acts as a precipitating agent, Acidiphilium species can reduce ferric iron to ferrous iron, aiding in the dissolution of ferric minerals Scientists have identified acidophilic bacteria capable of removing up to 90% of metals, such as iron, zinc, and copper, from acid AMD [80].
The bioremediation process is further improved by the concept of symbiotic bioremediation, in which bacterial consortia work with bio-augmentation. There is an example of Acidithiobacillus spp. with Leptospirillum ferrooxidans that could speed up the rate of heavy metal removal from sediment [58]. This confirmed that co-culturing these bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis, with other species, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Aspergillus niger, resulted in significantly higher heavy metal extraction efficiency. The bioaugmentation process leveraged the metal-binding proteins and biosurfactants produced by P. aeruginosa in conjunction with the bioaccumulation capabilities of B. subtilis. Symbiotic association was ensured by optimizing pH (7.0–7.5), temperature (30–37 °C), and nutrient supplementation (e.g., glucose and nitrogen sources), as reported in studies highlighting the mutual metabolic benefits between these species [80].
It has been shown that integrating acidophilic bacteria with other wastewater treatment technologies can be improved by combining their abilities to break down organic and inorganic contaminants. This can result in more efficient wastewater treatment and lower energy use [81].
Table 2. List of inorganic pollutants along with relevant acidophiles.
Table 2. List of inorganic pollutants along with relevant acidophiles.
DomainAcidophilesInorganic PollutantsRemoval %DurationPollutant Initial ConcentrationReferences
Heavy Metals
BacteriaAcidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, cidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidomicrobium ferrooxidans, Ferroplasma, Alicyclobacillus, Acidiphilium spp., Sulfobacillus spp., Acidocella spp.Iron Reduction85–90%10–15 days500 mg/L[82,83,84]
Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, Desulfobulbus, Desulfosarcina, Desulfobacter, Desulfotomaculum, Desulfosporosinus, Thermodesulfobacterium, Thermodesulfovibrio, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Desulfomicrobium baculatumSulfate Reduction70–80%12–20 days300 mg/L[85,86,87]
DesulfurellaSulfur Reduction75%14 days200 mg/L[88,89]
Acidithiobacillus spp., Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Acidiphilium cryptumSymbiotic RoleN/AN/AN/A[90,91,92]
AlgaeAnabaena, Cladophora, Oscillatoria, Phaeodactylum, Scenedesmus, Spirulina sp.Bio-sorption and Bioaccumulation60–85%7–14 days100 mg/L[92,93,94]
Radioactive Pollutants
Bacteria A. ferrooxidans, Cupriavidus metalliduransBio-sorption80–90%10 days50 mg/L[95,96]
Sulfolobus metallicu, Acidithiobacillus sp., Sulfolobus metallicusBioaccumulation85%12 days70 mg/L[97,98,99]

3.1.3. Potential Impacts of Acidophiles

Acidophilic bacteria applied in wastewater treatment can simultaneously bring about benefits and problems regarding environmental and health aspects. Overcoming such challenges by developing appropriate sustainable and eco-friendly technologies for treatment will be critical in ensuring that safety and effectiveness continue during the process.
Acidophilic microbes in wastewater can unintentionally release low-pH water, damaging aquatic ecosystems and affecting biodiversity. To prevent environmental harm, pH levels must be monitored and adjusted before reuse. Hybrid systems can handle acidic waste, followed by a neutralization phase to restore pH before discharge. Natural or synthetic pH buffers can also help neutralize excess acidity [100].
Poorly managed wastewater treatment procedures may not completely eradicate hazardous pathogens, especially in situations where the microbial population is not working effectively. In this respect, acidophilic bacteria are effective for some contaminants but may not remove all and can potentially harm human health. Integration of acidophilic bacteria with other methods, besides the use of hybrid systems (e.g., UV disinfection, membrane filtration), can develop mitigation strategies for better pathogen elimination efficiency [101].
Hybrid systems combining acidophilic microbes with other organisms can enhance pollution removal and reduce environmental concerns. These systems are durable, sustainable, and improve treatment outcomes. A circular economy can reduce environmental impact by reusing waste products, like wastewater, for irrigation, industrial operations, or energy production. Ecological design approaches, like nature-based solutions, wetland treatment systems, and integrated artificial wetlands, can enhance system sustainability [81].

3.2. Alkaliphile Microorganisms in Wastewater Treatment

Alkaliphiles are capable of growing in an alkaline environment that has a pH greater than 8, and the best growth rate is usually seen at a pH of 9 and 10. These organisms have been reported to have an important application in treating wastewater containing inorganic pollutants, mainly because these microorganisms can survive and effectively carry out their metabolic processes at high pH levels (Figure 8) [36]. Mostly, alkaliphilic microorganisms facilitate wastewater treatment via the production of bio-flocculants. These bio-flocculants are natural, biodegradable polymers, which coagulate and sediment the suspended and dissolved materials and other contaminants in wastewater [102]. The bio-flocculants produced by Bacillus licheniformis have proved to be very effective in treating tannery wastewater by flocculating the suspended particles and thereby enabling their settling [103].
Alkaliphiles synthesize bio-flocculants by secreting polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids that help in the removal of contaminants in wastewater through processes such as bridging, charge neutralization, and adsorption. The performance of these bio-flocculants depends on parameters such as molecular weight and functional groups of the EPS, and environmental factors, such as pH and ionic strength [103,104].
The use of bio-flocculants is preferable over the use of chemical flocculants in many ways. They do not pollute the environment, are non-toxic and biodegradable. The use of bio-flocculants from alkaliphilic bacteria is also economical, since substrates that support bacterial growth and EPS formation are cheap. This cuts down the overall cost and environmental burden of wastewater treatment methods [105].
Alkaliphilic bio-flocculants are more effective at treating industrial effluents, for example, from the textile, food and tannery industries. In the context of tannery wastewater, bio-flocculants are quite effective in the removal of heavy metals, organic compounds, and other pollutants. This improves the quality of the treated water and reduces the detrimental effect of industrial emissions on the environment [106]. More studies are being conducted to enhance the synthesis and efficiency of bio-flocculants through genetic manipulation and the enhancement of fermentation processes. Using mixed cultures of alkaliphilic microorganisms can produce different types of bio-flocculants that improve the efficiency of wastewater treatment processes [107].

3.2.1. Alkaliphiles for Organic Wastewater

Alkaliphiles are also characterized by their distinctive biochemical processes, through which they can preserve their internal balance in very adverse conditions. The hydroxide ions are highly reactive, but they cannot easily pass through the adapted cell walls of alkaliphiles, which provide protection to the cells. Such organisms also have very efficient ion pumps to remove any excess hydroxide ions from the cytoplasm and thus maintain a near-neutral cytoplasmic pH. The enzymes of these organisms have evolved to work optimally at high pH conditions, facilitating efficient metabolism [108].
Alkaliphilic microorganisms are favorable options for the treatment of organic wastewater from different industries, like textiles, tanneries, and paper mills. These alkaliphilic bacteria present in bioreactors can metabolize the organic pollutants in the wastewater and adsorb the heavy metal ions, thus minimizing the concentration of the toxic components in the wastewater [109]. Interestingly, Bacillus licheniformis has been proven to have the potential to treat tannery effluents in terms of the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), and total chromium [38,103].
Alkaliphilic bacillus and Pseudomonas metabolize and degrade various complex compounds (dyes and hydrocarbons) present in industrial effluent, to a great extent. These bacteria can decompose and demobilize pollutants in the environment and, hence, lessen the impact of pollution due to organic substances hazardous to living organisms [110].
Moreover, alkaliphilic microorganisms can transform metal ions into insoluble compounds, which are less soluble than initial metal ions. Bacillus reduces soluble Cr6+ ions into relatively less soluble Cr3+ ions, thus assisting in the removal of the former from effluent. This process thus improves the efficiency of heavy metal elimination from contaminated water streams [111].
The mutualistic interaction between alkaliphilic bacteria and fungi improves bioremediation efficiency. For example, bacteria and fungi can synergistically or antagonistically act to break down organic matter and withstand heavy metals in order to enhance the processes of wastewater treatment [36]. Alkaliphilic microbes catabolize polymeric organic molecules into simpler molecules, such as carbon dioxide and water. This mineralization process is vital for regulating persistent and bio-accumulative substances like phenols and PAHs in industrial wastewater. Ref. isolated an alkaliphilic enzyme, phenol hydroxylase, which operates optimally at high pH to degrade phenolic compounds. Many alkaliphiles have been included and listed in Table 3, which represents each alkaliphile and its pollutants.

3.2.2. Alkaliphiles for Inorganic Pollutant Wastewater Treatment

Another characteristic of alkaliphilic microorganisms is the ability to perform the bio-oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds. This feature is very effective in the treatment of industrial waste pollutants, like sulfide, polysulfide, thiosulfate, tetrathionate, and thiocyanate [132].
Species such as Thioalkalivibrio, Thioalkalivibrio halophilus, and Thioalkalivibrio versutus have been shown to be highly effective in sulfide oxidation under alkaline conditions. These bacteria are halophilic and alkaliphilic, meaning that they can survive in salty and alkaline conditions. Moreover, they are used in the oil refining and gas production industries.
Ref. [133] described the process of thiopaq, which employs these bacteria in 99% H2S reduction from biogas streams, thus revealing the efficiency of alkaliphiles in gas desulfurization processes.
Moreover, alkaliphiles are involved in the bio-amalgamation and biomineralization of heavy metals, like zinc, lead, and copper. Microbes, such as Ectothiorhodospira magna and Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii, remove heavy metals, like zinc, lead, and copper, by oxidizing sulfides to sulfur which then reacts with the metals to produce sulfides. This process effectively scrapes out heavy metals from the liquid phase and hence plays a role in minimizing water pollution [134,135].
The application of alkaliphilic bacteria has been studied in the treatment of arsenic contamination. Certain forms of arsenite oxidase can metabolize As (III) to As (V), making removing arsenic from water easier. This capability is invaluable when it comes to treating industrial effluents with arsenic as one of the contaminants [136].
To optimize the growth and activity of alkaliphiles in bioreactors, it is crucial to adjust environmental conditions, bioreactor design, and operational strategies. Key approaches include pH control, temperature optimization, and nutrient supply. Alkaliphiles thrive in high pH environments, so maintaining an optimal pH is essential to prevent stress and maximize enzymatic activity. Maintaining optimal temperatures enhances metabolic rates and pollutant degradation efficiency. Balancing nutrients prevents metabolic bottlenecks [137].
Mitigating inhibitory compound effects involves pre-treatment of wastewater, stepwise loading, and using protective carriers. Encapsulation or immobilization of alkaliphiles on carriers like alginate beads, activated carbon, or biofilm matrices can shield them from toxic compounds and stabilize their growth [138].
Optimizing bioreactor design involves reactor configuration, mixing and aeration, and retention time. Advanced designs, like biofilm reactors, fluidized bed reactors, and membrane bioreactors, provide higher surface area and retention time, enhancing microbial activity. Efficient mixing and oxygen supply ensure even distribution of nutrients and inhibitory compounds, reducing localized stress on microorganisms. Prolonged retention times allow alkaliphiles to metabolize inhibitory compounds gradually, increasing degradation efficiency [139].

3.3. Halophilic Microorganisms in Wastewater Treatment

Halophilic bacterial species are grown, reproduced, and function properly in conditions of high salinity and can also handle the process of metabolism in such conditions; hence, they can be used for the purification of water from industries that produce high-salt wastewaters and other hazardous organic compounds, including the petroleum, textile, and tanning industries [140].
Halophiles are categorized based as (i) slight halophiles that grow in 1–3% NaCl, (ii) moderate halophiles in 3–15% NaCl and (iii) extreme halophiles in 15–30% NaCl [141,142]. Halomonas, Haloarcula, and Natrinema are widely known genera of halophiles and play important roles in the bioremediation of wastewater. In particular, Halomonas species play an important role in phenol and other aromatics degradation in environments with high salinity [142,143].
Halophiles have adopted certain mechanisms in order to live in high-saline environments. They store compatible solutes, like glycine betaine, betaine, and ectoine, in the cell in order control the osmotic pressure without affecting the cellular processes. These enzymes are tolerant to high salinity and their efficiency increases with an increase in salinity; therefore, they are appropriate for bioremediation [144]. These adaptations enable the halophiles to perform metabolic functions essential in extreme circumstances, and therefore they are useful in treating saline industrial wastewater (Figure 9) [145,146].

3.3.1. Halophilic Organic Pollutant Wastewater Treatment

Many industries generate saline wastewater, such as those involved in textile manufacturing, food processing, and petrochemical production [147]. These waters not only have high levels of salinity but also contain high concentrations of organic compounds, such as aromatic hydrocarbons and phenolic compounds [148]. The petroleum industries generate water with high salinity, hydrocarbons, and phenolic matter. Moreover, in the textile industry, salt is a major ingredient in dyeing processes, so it discharges dye effluents with high salinity [149].
Halophilic bacteria can function in highly acidic or alkaline conditions, where there is a reduced presence of other microorganisms in the treatment of industrial wastewater (Table 3). Marinobacter sp., a bacterial species, ferments ethanol from glucose and cellulosic materials in unsterilized seawater and algal-contaminated wastewater. This is advantageous in the biorefining industries, as it eliminates the need for sterile water and allows the use of low-quality, inexpensive water sources [140]. Moreover, they are used for the breakdown of hazardous organic compounds, like phenol and benzene. Some of the halophilic strains isolated from oil-contaminated environments have been found to have the potential for complete degradation of phenol at high levels within 8–144 h depending on the conditions. They can use a wide range of biochemical reactions to break down and metabolize the complex organic substrates into simpler and non-toxic products. Phenol hydroxylase and catechol 1,2-dioxygenase enzymes are highly involved in the first steps of the phenol biodegradation process [150,151].

3.3.2. Halophilic Inorganic Pollutant Wastewater Treatment

Apart from organic pollutants, halophilic bacteria have been known to show high efficiency in the bioremediation of heavy metals from wastewater (Table 4). The two bacterial species, Ectothiorhodospira magna and Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii, precipitate heavy metals, such as zinc, lead, and copper, by converting sulfides to sulfur, which in turn reacts with the metal ions to produce sulfides. This process immobilizes the heavy metals in the aqueous phase and, hence, decreases their pollution potential [145].
Halophilic bacteria are also applied in the biodegradation of pollutants with arsenic. Some strains of thiomonas can convert arsenite As (III) into the less toxic arsenate As (V), thus helping in the removal of arsenic from water. This feature is helpful in treating industrial wastes, in which arsenic is a frequent constituent [145].
Halophilic bacteria have been used in commercial and large-scale wastewater treatments in bioreactors. Some of these systems employ the use of activated sludge with halophiles to treat the pollutants. The activated sludge from marine mud was able to remove more than 80% of phenol in a batch experiment and bioreactor within 48 h [152]. Activated sludge is used in wastewater treatment systems because it contains a high concentration of microorganisms that help break down organic pollutants. In the process, wastewater is aerated to encourage the growth of bacteria, protozoa, and other microorganisms in a suspended state, known as activated sludge. These microorganisms degrade organic matter through biochemical reactions, effectively reducing pollutants in the water. Halophilic mixed cultures have also been successfully applied in anaerobic MBR systems for treating saline wastewater with pollutants of phenylphenol and bisphenol A [153].
These characteristics make them suitable for use in long-term treatment in the WWTPs; they do not require frequent replacement owing to microbiological fouling. The Halomonas species has a very low contamination level and is very effective in treatment processes and can even work in open bioreactors [145,154]. The Halomonas family lives in wastewater treatment plants without causing problems. Its species thrive in salty wastewater with colony-forming unit counts below 105 per milliliter and higher than 103 per milliliter, which shows that the population appears cleaner than other bacteria discovered. Organisms that flourish in extreme conditions and keep their dirt levels low can be important bioremediation tools.
Moreover, the sulfur-oxidizing halophilic bacteria Thioalkali vibrio is used in bioreactors to eliminate sulfur from biogas in the thiopaq process. This process reacts with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and produces elemental sulfur at an alkaline pH, which makes the treatment of biogas cost-effective, along with its purification [155,156].
Table 4. List of inorganic pollutant treatments with relevant halophiles.
Table 4. List of inorganic pollutant treatments with relevant halophiles.
DomainHalophilesPollutantsMechanismRemoval %References
Organic Pollutants
BacteriaHalomonas spp.Phenol and other aromatic hydrocarbonsBiodegradation85%[157]
Bacillus marmarensisEthanol fermentation Fermentation90% ethanol yield[158]
Halophilic strains from oil-contaminated environmentsComplete phenol degradationBiodegradation95%[159]
Mixed halophilic culturesPhenyl-phenol, bisphenol A (in anaerobic MBR systems)Biodegradation in MBR systems80–85%[160]
Halophilic bacteria from marine mudPhenol degradation (more than 80% removal in 48 h)Biodegradation80%[161]
Bacillus spp.Organic matter, hydrocarbonsBiodegradation85%[162]
Ochrobactrum, Marinobacter, BacillusFish market wastewater (COD, TSS removal, energy production in MFC)Biodegradation and energy production90%[154]
Lysinibacillus fusiformis and Providencia stuartiiProteins, lipids, mucopolysaccharides from tannery wastewaterBiodegradation88%[163]
ArchaeaHaloarchaeaCarbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and heavy metal metabolism in hypersaline wastewaterMetabolism and remediation75–90%[164]
Inorganic Pollutants
BacteriaEctothiorhodospira magna, Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikoviiZinc, lead, copper (via sulfide oxidation to sulfur)Sulfide oxidation to sulfur85%[165]
Thiomonas spp.Arsenic (As (III) to As (V) conversion)Oxidation90%[166]
Thioalkalivibrio spp.Sulfur (H2S removal from biogas in the thiopaq process)Oxidation88%[155]
Halophilic bacteriaHeavy metals, arsenicBioaccumulation and biosorption80%[167]
Ochrobactrum, Marinobacter, Rhodococcus, BacillusSeafood and pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with energy productionBiodegradation and energy generation85%[168]
Exiguobacterium mexicanumNitrogen removal from saline wastewater via heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrificationNitrification and denitrification78%[169]

3.4. Thermophilic Microorganisms in the Treatment of Wastewater

Nowadays, organisms that function at temperatures above 45 °C are increasingly used in wastewater treatment due to their high efficiency under thermophilic conditions. Thermophilic microorganisms demonstrate exceptional suitability for wastewater treatment in warm industrial settings due to their metabolism, which functions best at temperatures above 45 °C. Five major industrial sectors, i.e., paper and pulp, food processing, chemical manufacturing and textiles regularly produce wastewater exceeding temperatures of 45 °C. Solar thermal microorganisms eliminate the need for cooling infrastructure, which results in both decreased operational expenses and reduced environmental impacts. Studies indicate that thermophilic anaerobic digesters produce higher biodegradation outcomes and methane production levels than mesophilic systems, making them a perfect solution for treating hot industrial discharge streams [170,171].
Thermal resistance, along with anti-fouling capabilities and metabolic flexibility under variable environmental conditions, make thermophiles an ideal choice for warm wastewater systems. Two studies, Thermophilic Wastewater Treatment: A Review on Applicability and Process Stability and Microbial Strategies for High-Temperature Wastewater Treatment present extensive practical research on thermophilic organisms. Laboratory research demonstrates that Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus performs efficiently for biogas production from organic waste while functioning at high temperatures [170,171].
Research should examine the relationship between thermophilic systems and mesophilic systems through assessments of pollutant removal capabilities and system energy performance. Precise knowledge of thermophilic reactor design combined with nutrient management and inhibitory compound influences at elevated temperatures represents foundational information for future scientific exploration. These expanded research areas will enhance the direction of analysis towards practical applications of extremophiles for warm wastewater management [Table 5] [170,171].

3.4.1. Thermophilic Organic Pollutant Wastewater Treatment

Thermophilic microbes possess active and heat-resistant enzymes that hydrolyze protein, lipids, and polysaccharides into simpler forms of organic polymers using extracellular enzymes. These monomers are then subjected to fermentative thermophiles to produce volatile fatty acids, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. This phase is significant because it produces methanogenic substrates needed for the last stage of anaerobic digestion and can effectively break down proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates present in food items [172]. Intermediate products are converted to methane and carbon dioxide by thermophilic methanogens. The rate of this process is faster at high temperatures in thermophilic digesters, hence increasing the production of biogas [116,117]. Moreover, when the process of ozonation is combined with thermophiles, it significantly enhances the removal of COD and chromaticity in effluents from high-temperature pulping processes. This integrated method can achieve COD and chromaticity removal efficiencies of up to 90% [172,173]. Some thermophilic microorganisms, such as Chloroflexus, Meiothermus, and Roseiflexus species, comprise a large part of the microbial community in thermophiles. These bacteria are efficient in breaking the lignin and other macromolecules, which are the most common effluents in the pulp industry. Ref. [173] found that the insertion of planktonic thermophiles in biofilm systems coupled with ozonation improves COD and chromaticity removal, thus enhancing biodegradation of the effluent [173,174]. Mostly, thermophiles are useful in anaerobic digestion processes for the stabilization and treatment of sewage sludge and high-concentration industrial waste effluents. This involves the mechanism of Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion (TAD), where anaerobic enzymes work optimally at higher temperatures to degrade the waste into biogas with very low CO2 emissions. This process also reduces the production of volatile organic compounds in the sludge, improves dewatering, and enhances biogas production [175].
Table 5. Different types of thermophilic microbes and their role in wastewater treatment.
Table 5. Different types of thermophilic microbes and their role in wastewater treatment.
DomainThermophilesPollutantsRemoval %References
Organic pollutants
BacteriaChloroflexus sp.Lignin and macromolecules75–80%[176]
Meiothermus sp.Lignin and macromolecules80%[177]
Roseiflexus sp.Lignin and macromolecules85%[174]
Thermophilic methanogensProteins, lipids, carbohydrates70–85% CH4 yield[178]
Thermoanaerobacterium sp.Sewage sludge, industrial effluent (TAD process)75–88%[179]
Clostridium thermocellumOrganic matter, cellulose, complex biopolymers80–85%[180]
Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticumCarbohydrates, volatile fatty acids78%[181]
Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticusPolysaccharides, organic matter85%[182]
ArchaeaThermophilic Anaerobic DigestersSewage sludge, high-concentration industrial waste80%[183]
Methanothermobacter marburgensisSewage sludge, high-organic waste85% CH4 yield[130]
Methanosaeta sp., Methanosarcina sp.Industrial wastewater (organic pollutants)75–85% CH4 yield[184]
Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicusSewage sludge, organic waste80% CH4 yield[130]
Inorganic pollutants
BacteriaSulfur-oxidizing thermophiles (Thermothrix sp. (sulfur-oxidizing, Thermothrix thiopara)Sulfides and sulfur-containing compounds85–90%
80–85%
[185]
Iron-oxidizing thermophilesIron (ferrous to ferric)80–85%[186,187]
ArchaeaAcidianus brierleyiSulfolobus acidocaldariusSulfides90%[188]

3.4.2. Thermophilic Inorganic Pollutant Wastewater Treatment

Consequently, sulfur and iron metabolism in wastewater treatment are associated with thermophiles. Sulfur-oxidizing thermophiles help to decrease the toxicity of wastewater through the oxidation of sulfides and sulfur-containing compounds to sulfate. Similarly, iron-oxidizing thermophiles convert ferrous to ferric, and then ferric is deposited and settled out of the liquid effluent. These metabolic activities are very useful in the treatment of mines and industrial metallurgical effluents with high sulfur and iron content [189].
In practice, many bioreactors with thermophilic bacteria are applied in the treatment of industrial wastewater. Thermophilic bioreactor systems combined with ozonation units provide better treatment for the thermophilic effluents. This combined system uses the high degradation capability of thermophiles and the strong oxidative force of ozone to enhance COD and chromaticity removal rates. For example, in the case of pulping wastewater treatment, the thermophilic biofilm system has been found to reduce COD by 59% [189].
Moreover, the use of thermophilic conditions in wastewater treatment has several advantages, including a high reaction rate, low biomass yielding, and effective pathogen die-off. These are the advantages of thermophilic technologies, and therefore are useful in the treatment of high-strength industrial effluents with high concentrations of organic matter. Moreover, thermophilic systems have a higher load ability and higher rate of biodegradation compared to mesophilic systems and are thus fit to be used in industries that demand fast and effective ways of treating their wastewater [190].

3.5. Extremophilic Microalgae

Extremophilic microalgae have gained attention for their application in wastewater treatment due to their efficiency in growing in extreme conditions of salinity, temperature, and pH. These characteristics make them suitable for industrial effluent. It is crucial to pay attention to the possibilities of their application in the improvement of efficiency and sustainability of the treatment plant [Figure 10] [191]. Extremophilic microalgae have generated research interest for wastewater treatment because they survive well in extreme salinity, temperature, and pH conditions. These special characteristics help them clean industrial wastewater better, because such effluents exist in tough environments. Our studies into their application help us develop better wastewater plants that work efficiently and last longer. By leveraging their adaptability, these microalgae could contribute to improved pollutant degradation, resource recovery, and overall operational resilience, paving the way for more sustainable treatment solutions.

3.5.1. Organic Pollutant Removal

Among extremophilic microalgae, Galdieria sulphuraria are very efficient in treating wastewater containing high levels of organic matter. Galdieria sulphuraria is a thermo-acidophilic red alga that has the ability to grow at a very low pH value of 1.8 and at a temperature of 56 °C, thus being suitable for treating acid and warm industrial effluents. This alga is capable of decreasing the following parameters in wastewater: organic carbon by 46–72%, ammonium by 63–89%, and phosphate by 71–95% (Table 6) [41].

3.5.2. Heavy Metal Removal

It should also be noted that these microalgae can filter out heavy metals from the water. Galdieria sulphuraria has been reported to have good biosorption potential for heavy metals, such as vanadium, uranium, and titanium [192]. The presence of special binding sites on the surface of microalgal cells enables the adsorption of heavy metal ions, as a result of which the concentration of the pollutant substances in wastewater decreases. This feature is especially effective for the treatment of wastewater containing industrial metals as hazardous impurities [192,193].

3.5.3. Nutrient Removal

Extremophilic microalgae are already known to uptake nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, which are commonly present in high concentrations in agricultural and industrial wastewaters [191]. Scenedesmus and Nannochloropsis are some of the microalgae that are capable of filtering large quantities of nitrogen and phosphorus from water and therefore prevent cases of eutrophication in water bodies. This process in the conservation of water ecology systems and the protection of the environment is very important [28].

3.5.4. Integration with Bacterial Systems

Immobilization of extremophilic microalgae in bacterial systems enhances the overall efficiency of the wastewater treatment system. In these biofilms, the microalga photosynthesizes oxygen, which is in turn relied on by the bacteria to break down organic matter aerobically [194]. This system improves the efficiency of pollutant removal in water and reduces the mechanical aeration energy consumption used in standard wastewater treatment plants. According to the literature, this integration can assist in increasing the effectiveness and efficacy of the treatment and its maintenance [194].
New bioreactor designs including Algal Turf Scrubbers and rotating algal biofilm reactors have been introduced to enhance the use of extremophilic microalgae in treating wastewater. Such systems are efficient in nutrient and heavy metals removal with a marked performance in rotating algal biofilm reactors in sulfate-rich mining effluents treatment. Research shows that rotating algal biofilm reactors can remove up to 46% of sulfate and 87% of total nitrogen, demonstrating their effectiveness in treating sulfate-rich mining effluents and other industrial wastewater [195].
As a result, the application of extremophilic microalgae in wastewater treatment has the advantage of transforming pollutants into useful biomass. This biomass is used for the production of a plethora of bioproducts, including biofuels, animal feed, bio-fertilizers, etc., which enhance the circular bioeconomy. Moreover, G. sulphuraria creates phycocyanin, which is used in food processing and cosmetics, to name but a few areas, thus making the treatment process more profitable [196]. Thus, these extremophilic microalgae, which have the dual advantage of pollutant removal and biomass production, can be used for wastewater treatment, making for a sustainable and cost-effective method [197,198]. Table 6 provides a list of certain types of extremophiles, along with pollutant treatments.
Table 6. Different types of extremophile microalgae and their role in wastewater treatment.
Table 6. Different types of extremophile microalgae and their role in wastewater treatment.
Pollutant TypePollutantsExtremophilic MicroalgaeMechanismRemoval %References
Organic PollutantsOrganic matterGaldieria sulphurariaBiodegradation of organic load85–90%[32]
PharmaceuticalsScenedesmus sp.Adsorption and biodegradation75–85%[199]
Textile dyesDunaliella salinaDecolorization and degradation80–88%[200]
Industrial effluentsNannochloropsis gaditanaReduction of organic and toxic load78–85%[201]
Organic pollutants (general)Spirulina platensisBiodegradation80%[201]
Inorganic PollutantsNutrient Removal (Nitrogen, phosphorus)Scenedesmus sp., NannochloropsisAssimilation and nutrient uptake75–90%[202]
Nutrients (Nitrates, phosphates)Galdieria sulphurariaNutrient assimilation85%[191]
Heavy Metals (Aluminum (Al), Nickel (Ni), Copper (Cu), Vanadium, Uranium, Titaniumacidophila, Galdieria sulphurariaBiosorption and bioaccumulation70–85%[203]
SulfatesMicroalgae in rotating biofilm reactorsSulfate reduction80–90%[27]
Emerging ContaminantsPharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs)Microalgae consortiaBiodegradation and biosorption75–85%[204,205,206]

4. Conclusions

Extremophilic microorganisms possess a high resistance power in order to work under stress conditions, making them suitable for treating industrial wastewater, particularly from the petrochemical, mining, and textile industries, which emit wastewater with high salinity, heavy metals, and organic toxins. However, there are several problems that need to be addressed to enable the large-scale use of extremophiles in wastewater treatment. The slow growth rates of these microorganisms under production demands delayed treatment processes, while creating mandatory energy costs for maintaining the correct environmental parameters. The microorganisms used in aquaculture cannot easily adjust to changing wastewater content or eliminate new pollutants, including microplastics and pharmaceutical substances. To overcome these limitations, it is crucial to focus on improving bioreactor designs that optimize energy efficiency and scalability, increasing the ability of organisms to assimilate new and future pollutants, and refining genetic engineering to generate strains with higher efficiency and broader applicability. In particular, employing advanced omics technologies and CRISPR-based techniques could accelerate strain development and enhance pollutant degradation capabilities. Resolving these challenges will require cross-disciplinary efforts in biotechnology, nanotechnology, and systems biology to expand the application of extremophiles in wastewater treatment. Moreover, the potential of extremophilic organisms can be combined with other advanced technologies for the treatment of wastewater, including biogenic nanoparticles and biofilm reactors. Furthermore, extremophilic microalgae have the capability to generate biofuel feedstock during the treatment of wastewater, offering the hope of a closed-loop system, where the removal of pollutants is linked with the generation of useful bio-products. This approach not only enhances sustainability but also reduces the overall environmental impact of wastewater treatment systems.
There are several problems that need to be solved in order to use extremophiles on a large scale in wastewater treatment.
Environmental and Ecological Risks. Impact on Local Ecosystems: Extremophiles may disrupt local biodiversity if introduced unintentionally. Mitigation involves rigorous monitoring and hybrid treatment systems. Invasive Species: Certain extremophiles could become invasive, necessitating the use of non-invasive, well-studied strains and strict containment measures.
Limitations of Extremophile-Based Treatment. Specificity of Conditions: Extremophiles require precise environments, challenging scalability. Hybrid systems may enhance adaptability. Slow Growth: Extremophiles often grow slower, reducing efficiency. Optimized reactor designs or integrating fast-growing microbes can help.
Regulatory and Safety Challenges. Regulatory Hurdles: Lack of established standards for extremophile use. Clear frameworks are needed to ensure environmental and public health safety. Health Concerns: Potential toxic byproducts require thorough risk assessments and health protocols.
Cost and Technological Barriers. High Costs: Specialized infrastructure increases initial investment. Research into cost-effective solutions is essential. Technical Expertise: Deployment requires specialized knowledge, calling for operator training and expert support.
Public Perception and Acceptance. Concerns about Safety: Public skepticism may arise over safety and environmental impacts. Transparent communication and public education can build trust. This includes improving the design of bioreactors for industrial application, increasing the ability of the organisms to assimilate new and future pollutants, and refining genetic engineering for the generation of strains with higher efficiency. It is, therefore, important to resolve these challenges through cross-cutting studies in biotechnology, nanotechnology and systems biology to enhance the application of extremophiles in wastewater treatment.

5. Future Prospect

The potential of extremophilic organisms can be combined with other advanced technologies for the treatment of wastewater, including biogenic nanoparticles, and biofilm reactors. Furthermore, extremophilic microalgae have the capability to generate biofuel feedstock during the treatment of wastewater, which offers the hope of a closed loop system, where the removal of pollutants is linked with the generation of useful bio-products. Thus, with the further development of extremophilic microorganisms and partnership between different fields, wastewater management can be revolutionized, which will help to improve the quality of the future. By tapping into these strengths and combining these with advanced technology, it will be possible to come up with systems that are efficient in wastewater treatment, friendly to the environment and economical in the long run, thus playing a part in the conservation of the environment. The authors advocate for comprehensive research and exploration of the potential of extremophilic organisms in wastewater treatment by addressing certain pertinent problems, which will facilitate the advancement of these methodologies. There are a number of information gaps that need to be filled in order to progress the field of treating extremophilic wastewater: How can researchers and scientists address the challenges associated with large-scale implementation of extremophile-based wastewater treatment? A critical evaluation of the scalability and feasibility of these approaches would be needed. How can scalability, cost-effectiveness, and environmental sustainability be taken into account when optimizing extremophilic bacteria for practical wastewater treatment applications? What are the possible hazards and unforeseen repercussions of using extremophilic bacteria to clean wastewater, and how may these be avoided? How can the development and application of extremophilic wastewater treatment technology be accelerated through interdisciplinary cooperation among microbiologists, engineers, legislators, and industry stakeholders? Finally, a thorough examination of underlying biochemical mechanics of extremophilic organisms is required. Thus, with further development of extremophilic microorganisms and partnerships between different fields, wastewater management can be revolutionized, improving the quality of future treatment systems. By tapping into their strengths and combining them with advanced technologies, it will be possible to develop systems that are efficient in wastewater treatment, environmentally friendly, and economical in the long run, thus contributing to environmental conservation.

Author Contributions

For Conceptualization, H.M.A. and A.A.H.; methodology, H.M.A.; software, H.M.A.; validation, H.M.A.; formal analysis, H.M.A. and S.R.; investigation, H.M.A.; resources, H.M.A.; data curation, H.M.A. and A.I. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.A. and A.A.H.; writing—review and editing, H.M.A. and A.A.H. and A.I. and S.R.; visualization, H.M.A.; supervision, A.A.H.; project administration, A.A.H. and A.I.; funding acquisition, A.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aljerf, L. Data of thematic analysis of farmer’s use behavior of recycled industrial wastewater. Data Brief. 2018, 21, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bijekar, S.; Padariya, H.D.; Yadav, V.K.; Gacem, A.; Hasan, M.A.; Awwad, N.S.; Yadav, K.K.; Islam, S.; Park, S.; Jeon, B.-H. The state of the art and emerging trends in the wastewater treatment in developing nations. Water 2022, 14, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dolan, F.; Lamontagne, J.; Link, R.; Hejazi, M.; Reed, P.; Edmonds, J. Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, J.; Yang, H.; Gosling, S.N.; Kummu, M.; Flörke, M.; Pfister, S.; Hanasaki, N.; Wada, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, C. Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future. Earth’s Future 2017, 5, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rajendran, S.; Priya, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Hoang, T.K.; Sekar, K.; Chong, K.Y.; Khoo, K.S.; Ng, H.S.; Show, P.L. A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater-A review. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, F.; Wang, B.; Duan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Sui, Q.; Xu, D.; Qu, H.; Yu, G. Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in domestic, industrial, agricultural and aquacultural wastewater sources: A case study in Changzhou, China. Water Res. 2020, 182, 115956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bennish, M.L.; Ahmed, S. Shigellosis. In Hunter’s Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Diseases; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 492–499. [Google Scholar]
  8. Çimen, A. Removal of chromium from wastewater by reverse osmosis. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 89, 1238–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petrinic, I.; Korenak, J.; Povodnik, D.; Hélix-Nielsen, C. A feasibility study of ultrafiltration/reverse osmosis (UF/RO)-based wastewater treatment and reuse in the metal finishing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 101, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gibson, J.; Drake, J.; Karney, B. UV disinfection of wastewater and combined sewer overflows. Ultrav. Light. Hum. Health Dis. Environ. 2017, 996, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, C.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Zhuang, K.; Liu, Q. Effects of ultraviolet disinfection on antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from wastewater: Inactivation, antibiotic resistance profiles and antibiotic resistance genes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, V.; Othman, N.; Asharuddin, S. Applications of natural coagulants to treat wastewater—A review. Proc. MATEC Web Conf. 2017, 103, 06016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wenten, I.G. Reverse osmosis applications: Prospect and challenges. Desalination 2016, 391, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Colla, V.; Branca, T.A.; Rosito, F.; Lucca, C.; Vivas, B.P.; Delmiro, V.M. Sustainable reverse osmosis application for wastewater treatment in the steel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 130, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shak, K.P.Y.; Wu, T.Y. Optimized use of alum together with unmodified Cassia obtusifolia seed gum as a coagulant aid in treatment of palm oil mill effluent under natural pH of wastewater. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jagaba, A.H.; Abubakar, S.; Lawal, I.M.; Latiff, A.A.A.; Umaru, I. Wastewater treatment using alum, the combinations of alum-ferric chloride, alum-chitosan, alum-zeolite and alum-moringa oleifera as adsorbent and coagulant. Int. J. Eng. Manag. 2018, 2, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Masschelein, W.J.; Rice, R.G. Ultraviolet Light in Water and Wastewater Sanitation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. He, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G. Influence of salinity on microorganisms in activated sludge processes: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Orhon, D. Evolution of the activated sludge process: The first 50 years. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 608–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Estrada-Arriaga, E.B.; Cortés-Muñoz, J.E.; González-Herrera, A.; Calderón-Mólgora, C.G.; de Lourdes Rivera-Huerta, M.; Ramírez-Camperos, E.; Montellano-Palacios, L.; Gelover-Santiago, S.L.; Pérez-Castrejón, S.; Cardoso-Vigueros, L. Assessment of full-scale biological nutrient removal systems upgraded with physico-chemical processes for the removal of emerging pollutants present in wastewaters from Mexico. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 1172–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, X.; Dong, W.; Wang, H.; Jiang, S. Biological nutrient removal and molecular biological characteristics in an anaerobic-multistage anaerobic/oxic (A-MAO) process to treat municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nancharaiah, Y.; Mohan, S.V.; Lens, P. Recent advances in nutrient removal and recovery in biological and bioelectrochemical systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 215, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jegatheesan, V.; Pramanik, B.K.; Chen, J.; Navaratna, D.; Chang, C.-Y.; Shu, L. Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 204, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; An, H.; Zhao, J.; Chen, F. Free ammonia-based pretreatment enhances phosphorus release and recovery from waste activated sludge. Chemosphere 2018, 213, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, Y.; Hu, H.; Liu, J.; Luo, J.; Qian, G.; Wang, A. pH dependent phosphorus release from waste activated sludge: Contributions of phosphorus speciation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 267, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pang, N.; Bergeron, A.D.; Gu, X.; Fu, X.; Dong, T.; Yao, Y.; Chen, S. Recycling of nutrients from dairy wastewater by extremophilic microalgae with high ammonia tolerance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 15366–15375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. di Cicco, M.R.; Iovinella, M.; Palmieri, M.; Lubritto, C.; Ciniglia, C. Extremophilic microalgae Galdieria gen. for urban wastewater treatment: Current state, the case of “POWER” system, and future prospects. Plants 2021, 10, 2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baati, H.; Siala, M.; Azri, C.; Ammar, E.; Dunlap, C.; Trigui, M. Resistance of a Halobacterium salinarum isolate from a solar saltern to cadmium, lead, nickel, zinc, and copper. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 1699–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shukla, A.K.; Singh, A.K. Exploitation of potential extremophiles for bioremediation of xenobiotics compounds: A biotechnological approach. Curr. Genom. 2020, 21, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaushik, S.; Alatawi, A.; Djiwanti, S.R.; Pande, A.; Skotti, E.; Soni, V. Potential of extremophiles for bioremediation. Microb. Rejuvenation Polluted Environ. 2021, 1, 293–328. [Google Scholar]
  31. di Cicco, M.R.; Palmieri, M.; Altieri, S.; Ciniglia, C.; Lubritto, C. Cultivation of the acidophilic microalgae galdieria phlegrea with wastewater: Process yields. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sadeghi, M.; Kor, Y.; Keramat, S.; Mehrbakhsh, Z. Improving the efficiency of saline wastewater treatment plant through adaptation of halophilic microorganisms. Desalin Water Treat. 2019, 157, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gerrity, S.; Kennelly, C.; Clifford, E.; Collins, G. Hydrogen sulfide oxidation in novel horizontal-flow biofilm reactors dominated by an Acidithiobacillus and a Thiobacillus species. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37, 2252–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiang, G.; Zhou, M.; Chiu, T.H.; Sun, X.; Keller, J.; Bond, P.L. Wastewater-enhanced microbial corrosion of concrete sewers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 8084–8092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aragaw, T. Functions of various bacteria for specific pollutants degradation and their application in wastewater treatment: A review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 2063–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borkar, S. Alkaliphilic bacteria: Diversity, physiology and industrial applications. In Bioprospects of Coastal Eubacteria: Ecosystems of Goa; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 59–83. [Google Scholar]
  37. Abhay, P.; Rawat, P.; Singh, D. Isolation of alkaliphilic bacterium Citricoccus alkalitolerans CSB1: An efficient biosorbent for bioremediation of tannery waste water. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016, 62, 135. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ratnasari, A.; Zaidi, N.S.; Syafiuddin, A.; Boopathy, R.; Kueh, A.B.H.; Amalia, R.; Prasetyo, D.D. Prospective biodegradation of organic and nitrogenous pollutants from palm oil mill effluent by acidophilic bacteria and archaea. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 15, 100809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Asadi, P.; Rad, H.A.; Qaderi, F. Comparison of Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella sorokiniana pa. 91 in post treatment of dairy wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 29473–29489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Delanka-Pedige, H.M.; Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.; Cornelius, J.; Henkanatte-Gedera, S.M.; Tchinda, D.; Zhang, Y.; Nirmalakhandan, N. Pathogen reduction in an algal-based wastewater treatment system employing Galdieria sulphuraria. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, W.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, H. Nutrients removal and recovery from saline wastewater by Spirulina platensis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, J.; Zheng, X.; Liu, K.; Sun, S.; Li, X. Effect of tetracycline on the growth and nutrient removal capacity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in simulated effluent from wastewater treatment plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Yildiz, I. The effect of salinity concentration on algal biomass production and nutrient removal from municipal wastewater by Dunaliella salina. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2997–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pandey, H.; Singh, D.; Dhiman, V.K.; Dhiman, V.K.; Pandey, D. Extremophiles and their application in bioremediation. In Physiology, Genomics, and Biotechnological Applications of Extremophiles; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 188–206. [Google Scholar]
  45. Quatrini, R.; Johnson, D.B. Microbiomes in extremely acidic environments: Functionalities and interactions that allow survival and growth of prokaryotes at low pH. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018, 43, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Liang, Y.; Fan, F.; Zhang, X.; Yin, H. Metabolic diversity and adaptive mechanisms of iron-and/or sulfur-oxidizing autotrophic acidophiles in extremely acidic environments. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2016, 8, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. López-Archilla, A.I.; Marín, I.; Amils, R. Microbial community composition and ecology of an acidic aquatic environment: The Tinto River, Spain. Microb. Ecol. 2001, 41, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hedrich, S.; Schippers, A. Distribution of acidophilic microorganisms in natural and man-made acidic environments. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 40, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dopson, M.; González-Rosales, C.; Holmes, D.S.; Mykytczuk, N. Eurypsychrophilic acidophiles: From (meta)genomes to low-temperature biotechnologies. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1149903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, M.; Agarwal, S.; Agarwal Malik, R.; Kumar, G.; Pal, D.B.; Mandal, M.; Sarkar, A.; Bantun, F.; Haque, S.; Singh, P.; et al. Recent advances in microbial engineering approaches for wastewater treatment: A review. Bioengineered 2023, 14, 2184518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Jain, K.R.; Desai, C.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Madamwar, D. Editorial: Advanced Bioremediation Technologies and Processes for the Treatment of Synthetic Organic Compounds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 721319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, G.; Bai, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, B.; Xiao, Y. Application of metagenomics to biological wastewater treat-ment. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Anabtawi, H.M.; Lee, W.H.; Al-Anazi, A.; Mohamed, M.M.; Aly Hassan, A. Advancements in Biological Strategies for Controlling Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs). Water 2024, 16, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gilbride, K.A.; Lee, D.Y.; Beaudette, L.A. Molecular techniques in wastewater: Understanding microbial communities, detecting pathogens, and real-time process control. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 66, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, L.-x.; Huang, L.-n.; Méndez-García, C.; Kuang, J.-l.; Hua, Z.-s.; Liu, J.; Shu, W.-s. Microbial communities, processes and functions in acid mine drainage ecosystems. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 38, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luís, A.T.; Córdoba, F.; Antunes, C.; Loayza-Muro, R.; Grande, J.A.; Silva, B.; Diaz-Curiel, J.; Ferreira da Silva, E. Extremely acidic eukaryotic (Micro) organisms: Life in acid mine drainage polluted environments—Mini-review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 19, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mesa, V.; Gallego, J.L.; González-Gil, R.; Lauga, B.; Sánchez, J.; Méndez-García, C.; Peláez, A.I. Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic diversity across distinct microhabitats in an acid mine drainage. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 281856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Teng, W.; Liu, G.; Luo, H.; Zhang, R.; Xiang, Y. Simultaneous sulfate and zinc removal from acid wastewater using an acidophilic and autotrophic biocathode. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 304, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hallberg, K.; Kolmert, K.; Johnson, D.; Williams, P. A novel metabolic phenotype among acidophilic bacteria: Aromatic degradation and the potential use of these organisms for the treatment of wastewater containing organic and inorganic pollutants. In Process Metallurgy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 9, pp. 719–728. [Google Scholar]
  60. Navarro, C.A.; von Bernath, D.; Jerez, C.A. Heavy metal resistance strategies of acidophilic bacteria and their acquisition: Importance for biomining and bioremediation. Biol. Res. 2013, 46, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arulazhagan, P.; Al-Shekri, K.; Huda, Q.; Godon, J.-J.; Basahi, J.M.; Jeyakumar, D. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by an acidophilic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain AJH1 isolated from a mineral mining site in Saudi Arabia. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, Y.-J.; Park, J.-H.; Seo, K.-H. Presence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia exhibiting high genetic similarity to clinical isolates in final effluents of pig farm wastewater treatment plants. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jarboui, R.; Baati, H.; Fetoui, F.; Gargouri, A.; Gharsallah, N.; Ammar, E. Yeast performance in wastewater treatment: Case study of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Su, X.; Zhou, M.; Hu, P.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Mei, R.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Lin, H.; Chen, J.; Sun, F. Whole-genome sequencing of an acidophilic Rhodotorula sp. ZM1 and its phenol-degrading capability under acidic conditions. Chemosphere 2019, 232, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Comte, A.; Christen, P.; Davidson, S.; Pophillat, M.; Lorquin, J.; Auria, R.; Simon, G.; Casalot, L. Biochemical, transcriptional and translational evidences of the phenol-meta-degradation pathway by the hyperthermophilic Sulfolobus solfataricus 98/2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pandolfo, E.; Barra Caracciolo, A.; Rolando, L. Recent advances in bacterial degradation of hydrocarbons. Water 2023, 15, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sood, N.; Lal, B. Isolation of a novel yeast strain Candida digboiensis TERI ASN6 capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons in acidic conditions. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1728–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zanaroli, G.; Wang, Z.; Xu, P.; Tang, H. Enhancing bioremediation potential of Pseudomonas putida by developing its acid stress tolerance with glutamate decarboxylase dependent system and global regulator of extreme radiation resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Grant, C.; Woodley, J.M.; Baganz, F. Whole-cell bio-oxidation of n-dodecane using the alkane hydroxylase system of P. putida GPo1 expressed in E. coli. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2011, 48, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mishra, S.; Singh, S. Microbial degradation of n-hexadecane in mineral salt medium as mediated by degradative enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bogan, B.W.; Sullivan, W.R.; Kayser, K.J.; Derr, K.; Aldrich, H.C.; Paterek, J.R. Alkanindiges illinoisensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately hydrocarbonoclastic, aerobic squalane-degrading bacterium isolated from oilfield soils. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dore, S.; Clancy, Q.; Rylee, S.; Kulpa, C. Naphthalene-utilizing and mercury-resistant bacteria isolated from an acidic environment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shahi, A.; Aydin, S.; Ince, B.; Ince, O. Reconstruction of bacterial community structure and variation for enhanced petroleum hydrocarbons degradation through biostimulation of oil contaminated soil. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Uyttebroek, M.; Vermeir, S.; Wattiau, P.; Ryngaert, A.; Springael, D. Characterization of cultures enriched from acidic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil for growth on pyrene at low pH. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 3159–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Estévez, E.; Veiga, M.C.; Kennes, C. Biofiltration of waste gases with the fungi Exophiala oligosperma and Paecilomyces variotii. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cox, H.; Faber, B.; Van Heiningen, W.; Radhoe, H.; Doddema, H.; Harder, W. Styrene metabolism in Exophiala jeanselmei and involvement of a cytochrome P-450-dependent styrene monooxygenase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1471–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Estévez, E.; Veiga, M.C.; Kennes, C. Biodegradation of toluene by the new fungal isolates Paecilomyces variotii and Exophiala oligosperma. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 32, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bayramoğlu, G.; Çelik, G.; Arica, M.Y. Biosorption of Reactive Blue 4 dye by native and treated fungus Phanerocheate chrysosporium: Batch and continuous flow system studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 1689–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Qi, B.; Moe, W.; Kinney, K. Biodegradation of volatile organic compounds by five fungal species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 684–689. [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson, D. Selective solid media for isolating and enumerating acidophilic bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 1995, 23, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Beolchini, F.; Dell’Anno, A.; De Propris, L.; Ubaldini, S.; Cerrone, F.; Danovaro, R. Auto-and heterotrophic acidophilic bacteria enhance the bioremediation efficiency of sediments contaminated by heavy metals. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pandey, S.; Fosso-Kankeu, E.; Redelinghuys, J.; Kim, J.; Kang, M. Implication of biofilms in the sustainability of acid mine drainage and metal dispersion near coal tailings. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 788, 147851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. El Kik, O.; Lesage, G.; Zaviska, F.; Sauvêtre, A.; Heran, M.; Lestremau, F. Synergistic approach for enhanced wastewater treatment: Harnessing the potential of bioelectrochemical systems in integration with anaerobic membrane bioreactors. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Malik, L.; Hedrich, S. Ferric iron reduction in extreme acidophiles. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 818414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Coupland, K.; Johnson, D.B. Evidence that the potential for dissimilatory ferric iron reduction is widespread among acidophilic heterotrophic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 279, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghauri, M.A.; Okibe, N.; Johnson, D.B. Attachment of acidophilic bacteria to solid surfaces: The significance of species and strain variations. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 85, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sánchez-Andrea, I.; Stams, A.J.; Hedrich, S.; Ňancucheo, I.; Johnson, D.B. Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov.: An acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acidic sediments. Extremophiles 2015, 19, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sonne-Hansen, J.; Ahring, B.K. Thermodesulfobacterium hveragerdense sp. nov., and Thermodesulfovibrio islandicus sp. nov., two thermophilic sulfate reducing bacteria isolated from a Icelandic hot spring. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 22, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Devereux, R.; Delaney, M.; Widdel, F.; Stahl, D.A. Natural relationships among sulfate-reducing eubacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 6689–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Florentino, A.P.; Brienza, C.; Stams, A.J.; Sanchez-Andrea, I. Desulfurella amilsii sp. nov., a novel acidotolerant sulfur-respiring bacterium isolated from acidic river sediments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.; Sokolova, T.; Kostrikina, N.; Zavarzin, G. Desulfurella acetivorans gen. nov. and sp. nov.—A new thermophilic sulfur-reducing eubacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 1990, 153, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Johnson, D.B.; Rolfe, S.; Hallberg, K.B.; Iversen, E. Isolation and phylogenetic characterization of acidophilic microorganisms indigenous to acidic drainage waters at an abandoned Norwegian copper mine. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gurung, A.; Chakraborty, R. The role of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in alleviating the inhibitory effect of thiosulfate on the growth of acidophilic Acidiphilium species isolated from acid mine drainage samples from Garubathan, India. Can. J. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liu, Y.; Yin, H.; Zeng, W.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Baba, N.; Qiu, G.; Shen, L.; Fu, X.; Liu, X. The effect of the introduction of exogenous strain Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans A01 on functional gene expression, structure and function of indigenous consortium during pyrite bioleaching. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8092–8098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Singh, S.K.; Rahman, A.; Dixit, K.; Nath, A.; Sundaram, S. Evaluation of promising algal strains for sustainable exploitation coupled with CO2 fixation. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dirbaz, M.; Roosta, A. Adsorption, kinetic and thermodynamic studies for the biosorption of cadmium onto microalgae Parachlorella sp. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2302–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bütof, L.; Wiesemann, N.; Herzberg, M.; Altzschner, M.; Holleitner, A.; Reith, F.; Nies, D. Synergistic gold–copper detoxification at the core of gold biomineralisation in Cupriavidus metallidurans. Metallomics 2018, 10, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Desaunay, A.; Martins, J.M. Comparison of chemical washing and physical cell-disruption approaches to assess the surface adsorption and internalization of cadmium by Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 273, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Itoh, T.; Miura, T.; Sakai, H.D.; Kato, S.; Ohkuma, M.; Takashina, T. Sulfuracidifex tepidarius gen. nov., sp. nov. and transfer of Sulfolobus metallicus Huber and Stetter 1992 to the genus Sulfuracidifex as Sulfuracidifex metallicus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1837–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Barrows, J.M.; Goley, E.D. Synchronized swarmers and sticky stalks: Caulobacter crescentus as a model for bacterial cell biology. J. Bacteriol. 2023, 205, e00384-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hu, P.; Brodie, E.L.; Suzuki, Y.; McAdams, H.H.; Andersen, G.L. Whole-genome transcriptional analysis of heavy metal stresses in Caulobacter crescentus. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8437–8449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zouch, H.; Cabrol, L.; Chifflet, S.; Tedetti, M.; Karray, F.; Zaghden, H.; Sayadi, S.; Quéméneur, M. Effect of Acidic Industrial Effluent Release on Microbial Diversity and Trace Metal Dynamics During Resuspension of Coastal Sediment. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Alam, P.; Khan, A.H.; Pinê Américo-Pinheiro, J.H.; Ahmad, K. Innovative and Hybrid Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and Recycling; Routledge: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, M.; Ma, Y. A bioflocculant from Corynebacterium glutamicum and its application in acid mine wastewater treatment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1136473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, J.; Yun, Y.-q.; Xing, L.; Song, L. Novel bioflocculant produced by salt-tolerant, alkaliphilic strain Oceanobacillus polygoni HG6 and its application in tannery wastewater treatment. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gong, W.-X.; Wang, S.-G.; Sun, X.-F.; Liu, X.-W.; Yue, Q.-Y.; Gao, B.-Y. Bioflocculant production by culture of Serratia ficaria and its application in wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4668–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Picos-Corrales, L.A.; Sarmiento-Sánchez, J.I.; Ruelas-Leyva, J.P.; Crini, G.; Hermosillo-Ochoa, E.; Gutierrez-Montes, J.A. Environment-friendly approach toward the treatment of raw agricultural wastewater and river water via flocculation using chitosan and bean straw flour as bioflocculants. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 3943–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Maliehe, T.S.; Basson, A.K.; Dlamini, N.G. Removal of pollutants in mine wastewater by a non-cytotoxic polymeric bioflocculant from Alcaligenes faecalis HCB2. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Qiao, N.; Gao, M.; Zhang, X.; Du, Y.; Fan, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, N.; Yu, D. Trichosporon fermentans biomass flocculation from soybean oil refinery wastewater using bioflocculant produced from Paecilomyces sp. M2-1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 2821–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Mamo, G.; Mattiasson, B. Alkaliphilic microorganisms in biotechnology. In Biotechnology of Extremophiles: Advances and Challenges; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 243–272. [Google Scholar]
  111. Bhattacharya, A.; Goyal, N.; Gupta, A. Degradation of azo dye methyl red by alkaliphilic, halotolerant Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis EMLA3: Application in alkaline and salt-rich dyeing effluent treatment. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Medić, A.; Lješević, M.; Inui, H.; Beškoski, V.; Kojić, I.; Stojanović, K.; Karadžić, I. Efficient biodegradation of petroleum n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by polyextremophilic Pseudomonas aeruginosa san ai with multidegradative capacity. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 14060–14070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nourbakhsh, M.N.; Kiliçarslan, S.; Ilhan, S.; Ozdag, H. Biosorption of Cr6+, Pb2+ and Cu2+ ions in industrial waste water on Bacillus sp. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 85, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Horikoshi, K. Alkaliphiles: Some applications of their products for biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 735–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ke, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Su, X.; Wang, Y.; Lin, H.; Mei, R.; Zhang, Y.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Chen, C. Sustainable biodegradation of phenol by immobilized Bacillus sp. SAS19 with porous carbonaceous gels as carriers. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Qi, Y.B.; Wang, C.Y.; Lv, C.Y.; Lun, Z.M.; Zheng, C.G. Removal Capacities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by a Newly Isolated Strain from Oilfield Produced Water. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. McGenity, T.J.; Whitby, C.; Fahy, A. Alkaliphilic Hydrocarbon Degraders. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; Timmis, K.N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 1931–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kumari, S.; Regar, R.K.; Manickam, N. Improved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in a crude oil by individual and a consortium of bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 254, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Arulazhagan, P.; Vasudevan, N. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a halotolerant bacterial strain Ochrobactrum sp. VA1. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gou, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, S.; Wang, H.; Qiao, P.; Song, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Li, P. Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the response of indigenous bacteria in highly contaminated aged soil after persulfate oxidation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fernández-López, M.G.; Batista-García, R.A.; Aréchiga-Carvajal, E.T. Alkaliphilic/Alkali-Tolerant Fungi: Molecular, Biochemical, and Biotechnological Aspects. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Plate, L.; Marletta, M.A. Nitric oxide-sensing H-NOX proteins govern bacterial communal behavior. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yu, F.-B.; Li, X.-D.; Ali, S.W.; Shan, S.-D.; Luo, L.-P.; Guan, L.-B. Further characterization of o-nitrobenzaldehyde degrading bacterium Pseudomonas sp: ONBA-17 and deduction on its metabolic pathway. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 1303–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mangaiyarkarasi, M.M.; Vincent, S.; Janarthanan, S.; Rao, T.S.; Tata, B. Bioreduction of Cr (VI) by alkaliphilic Bacillus subtilis and interaction of the membrane groups. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 18, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Oie, C.S.; Albaugh, C.E.; Peyton, B.M. Benzoate and salicylate degradation by Halomonas campisalis, an alkaliphilic and moderately halophilic microorganism. Water Res. 2007, 41, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Amin, S.; Rastogi, R.P.; Chaubey, M.G.; Jain, K.; Divecha, J.; Desai, C.; Madamwar, D. Degradation and toxicity analysis of a reactive textile diazo dye-Direct Red 81 by newly isolated Bacillus sp. DMS2. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 576680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Manara, A.; DalCorso, G.; Baliardini, C.; Farinati, S.; Cecconi, D.; Furini, A. Pseudomonas putida response to cadmium: Changes in membrane and cytosolic proteomes. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 4169–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sorokin, D.Y.; Tourova, T.P.; Lysenko, A.M.; Mityushina, L.L.; Kuenen, J.G. Thioalkalivibrio thiocyanoxidans sp. nov. and Thioalkalivibrio paradoxus sp. nov., novel alkaliphilic, obligately autotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria capable of growth on thiocyanate, from soda lakes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hao, X.; Mu, T.; Sharshar, M.M.; Yang, M.; Zhong, W.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, G.; Xing, J. Revealing sulfate role in empowering the sulfur-oxidizing capacity of Thioalkalivibrio versutus D301 for an enhanced desulfurization process. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Imhoff, J.F.; Kyndt, J.A.; Meyer, T.E. Genomic Comparison, Phylogeny and Taxonomic Reevaluation of the Ectothiorhodospiraceae and Description of Halorhodospiraceae fam. nov. and Halochlorospira gen. nov. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Vainshtein, M.; Gogotova, G.; Heinritz, N.-J. Removal of H2S by the purple sulphur bacterium Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 10, 110–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Li, M.; He, Z.; Hu, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhong, H. Both cell envelope and cytoplasm were the locations for chromium (VI) reduction by Bacillus sp. M6. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 273, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Narihiro, T.; Terada, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Iguchi, A.; Ikeda, M.; Yamauchi, T.; Shiraishi, K.; Kamagata, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Sekiguchi, Y. Comparative analysis of bacterial and archaeal communities in methanogenic sludge granules from upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating various food-processing, high-strength organic wastewaters. Microbes Environ. 2009, 24, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xie, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, C.; Wu, Z. An anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for landfill leachate treatment: Performance and microbial community identification. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 161, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lee, J.; Mahandra, H.; Hein, G.A.; Ramsay, J.; Ghahreman, A. Toward sustainable solution for biooxidation of waste and refractory materials using neutrophilic and alkaliphilic microorganisms—A review. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 2274–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sharshar, M.M.; Samak, N.A.; Hao, X.; Mu, T.; Zhong, W.; Yang, M.; Peh, S.; Ambreen, S.; Xing, J. Enhanced growth-driven stepwise inducible expression system development in haloalkaliphilic desulfurizing Thioalkalivibrio versutus. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Šoštarić, T.D.; Petrović, M.S.; Pastor, F.T.; Lončarević, D.R.; Petrović, J.T.; Milojković, J.V.; Stojanović, M.D. Study of heavy metals biosorption on native and alkali-treated apricot shells and its application in wastewater treatment. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 259, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Chen, M. Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 214, 836–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mallick, I.; Bhattacharyya, C.; Mukherji, S.; Dey, D.; Sarkar, S.C.; Mukhopadhyay, U.K.; Ghosh, A. Effective rhizoinoculation and biofilm formation by arsenic immobilizing halophilic plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) isolated from mangrove rhizosphere: A step towards arsenic rhizoremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Preiss, L.; Hicks, D.B.; Suzuki, S.; Meier, T.; Krulwich, T.A. Alkaliphilic Bacteria with Impact on Industrial Applications, Concepts of Early Life Forms, and Bioenergetics of ATP Synthesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kanekar, P.P.; Nilegaonkar, S.S.; Sarnaik, S.S.; Kelkar, A.S. Optimization of protease activity of alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from an alkaline lake in India. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 85, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Castillo-Carvajal, L.C.; Sanz-Martín, J.L.; Barragán-Huerta, B.E. Biodegradation of organic pollutants in saline wastewater by halophilic microorganisms: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 9578–9588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gunjal, A.B.; Badodekar, N.P. Halophiles. In Physiology, Genomics, and Biotechnological Applications of Extremophiles; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 13–34. [Google Scholar]
  144. Saum, S.H.; Pfeiffer, F.; Palm, P.; Rampp, M.; Schuster, S.C.; Müller, V.; Oesterhelt, D. Chloride and organic osmolytes: A hybrid strategy to cope with elevated salinities by the moderately halophilic, chloride-dependent bacterium Halobacillus halophilus. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1619–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. García, M.T.; Mellado, E.; Ostos, J.C.; Ventosa, A. Halomonas organivorans sp. nov., a moderate halophile able to degrade aromatic compounds. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Mainka, T.; Weirathmüller, D.; Herwig, C.; Pflügl, S. Potential applications of halophilic microorganisms for biological treatment of industrial process brines contaminated with aromatics. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 48, kuab015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhuang, X.; Han, Z.; Bai, Z.; Zhuang, G.; Shim, H. Progress in decontamination by halophilic microorganisms in saline wastewater and soil. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Edbeib, M.F.; Wahab, R.A.; Huyop, F. Halophiles: Biology, adaptation, and their role in decontamination of hypersaline environments. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Aljerf, L. High-efficiency extraction of bromocresol purple dye and heavy metals as chromium from industrial effluent by adsorption onto a modified surface of zeolite: Kinetics and equilibrium study. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 225, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Xiao, Y.; Roberts, D.J. A review of anaerobic treatment of saline wastewater. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1025–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Lefebvre, O.; Moletta, R. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: A literature review. Water Res. 2006, 40, 3671–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Pugazhendi, A.; Jamal, M.T.; Al-Mur, B.A.; Jeyakumar, R.B. Bioaugmentation of electrogenic halophiles in the treatment of pharmaceutical industrial wastewater and energy production in microbial fuel cell under saline condition. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Shi, K.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y. Performance of halophilic marine bacteria inocula on nutrient removal from hypersaline wastewater in an intermittently aerated biological filter. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Huang, J.-L.; Wang, H.-H.; Alam, F.; Cui, Y.-W. Granulation of halophilic sludge inoculated with estuarine sediments for saline wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Torbaghan, M.E.; Torghabeh, G.H.K. Biological removal of iron and sulfate from synthetic wastewater of cotton delinting factory by using halophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Jamal, M.T.; Pugazhendi, A. Treatment of fish market wastewater and energy production using halophiles in air cathode microbial fuel cell. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 292, 112752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sorokin, D.Y.; Van Den Bosch, P.; Abbas, B.; Janssen, A.; Muyzer, G. Microbiological analysis of the population of extremely haloalkaliphilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria dominating in lab-scale sulfide-removing bioreactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 965–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sharshar, M.M.; Samak, N.A.; Ambreen, S.; Hao, X.; Mu, T.; Maarouf, M.; Zheng, C.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jia, Y. Improving confirmed nanometric sulfur bioproduction using engineered Thioalkalivibrio versutus. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 317, 124018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. García, M.T.; Ventosa, A.; Mellado, E. Catabolic versatility of aromatic compound-degrading halophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 54, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wernick, D.G.; Pontrelli, S.P.; Pollock, A.W.; Liao, J.C. Sustainable biorefining in wastewater by engineered extreme alkaliphile Bacillus marmarensis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Xu, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, W.; Tian, S.; Jiang, P.; Qi, Q.; Li, F.; Li, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, H. Potential biodegradation of phenanthrene by isolated halotolerant bacterial strains from petroleum oil polluted soil in Yellow River Delta. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Luo, W.; Phan, H.V.; Hai, F.I.; Price, W.E.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H.H.; Yamamoto, K.; Nghiem, L.D. Effects of salinity build-up on the performance and bacterial community structure of a membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Long, X.; Wang, D.; Zou, Y.; Tian, J.; Tian, Y.; Liao, X. Glycine betaine enhances biodegradation of phenol in high saline environments by the halophilic strain Oceanobacillus sp. PT-20. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 29205–29216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Mandree, P.; Masika, W.; Naicker, J.; Moonsamy, G.; Ramchuran, S.; Lalloo, R. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from industry contaminated soil using indigenous Bacillus spp. Processes 2021, 9, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Maharaja, P.; Boopathy, R.; Anushree, V.; Mahesh, M.; Swarnalatha, S.; Ravindran, B.; Chang, S.W.; Sekaran, G. Bio removal of proteins, lipids and mucopolysaccharides in tannery hyper saline wastewater using halophilic bacteria. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Sorokin, D.Y.; Messina, E.; Smedile, F.; La Cono, V.; Hallsworth, J.E.; Yakimov, M.M. Carbohydrate-dependent sulfur respiration in halo (alkali) philic archaea. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 3789–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Bryantseva, I.; Tourova, T.; Kovaleva, O.; Kostrikina, N.; Gorlenko, V. Ectothiorhodospira magna sp. nov., a new large alkaliphilic purple sulfur bacterium. Microbiology 2010, 79, 780–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Freel, K.C.; Krueger, M.C.; Farasin, J.; Brochier-Armanet, C.; Barbe, V.; Andres, J.; Cholley, P.-E.; Dillies, M.-A.; Jagla, B.; Koechler, S. Adaptation in toxic environments: Arsenic genomic islands in the bacterial genus Thiomonas. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sher, S.; Hussain, S.Z.; Rehman, A. Phenotypic and genomic analysis of multiple heavy metal–resistant Micrococcus luteus strain AS2 isolated from industrial waste water and its potential use in arsenic bioremediation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 2243–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Pugazhendi, A.; Al-Mutairi, A.E.; Jamal, M.T.; Jeyakumar, R.B.; Palanisamy, K. Treatment of seafood industrial wastewater coupled with electricity production using air cathode microbial fuel cell under saline condition. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 12535–12545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cui, Y.; Cui, Y.-W.; Huang, J.-L. A novel halophilic Exiguobacterium mexicanum strain removes nitrogen from saline wastewater via heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 333, 125189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Baker, B.A.; Tawabini, B.; Nazal, M.; AlThaqfi, J.; Khalil, A. Efficiency of thermophilic bacteria in wastewater treatment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Collivignarelli, M.C.; Bertanza, G.; Abbà, A.; Torretta, V.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. Wastewater treatment by means of thermophilic aerobic membrane reactors: Respirometric tests and numerical models for the determination of stoichiometric/kinetic parameters. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Atalah, J.; Cáceres-Moreno, P.; Espina, G.; Blamey, J.M. Thermophiles and the applications of their enzymes as new biocatalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Fontanier, V.; Farines, V.; Albet, J.; Baig, S.; Molinier, J. Study of catalyzed ozonation for advanced treatment of pulp and paper mill effluents. Water Res. 2006, 40, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Tang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Kuang, F.; Zhou, J. Coupling of thermophilic biofilm-based systems and ozonation for enhanced organics removal from high-temperature pulping wastewater: Performance, microbial communities, and pollutant transformations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 136802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Tyagi, V.K.; Campoy, R.A.; Álvarez-Gallego, C.; García, L.R. Enhancement in hydrogen production by thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge–optimization of treatment conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chauhan, P.S. Role of various bacterial enzymes in complete depolymerization of lignin: A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Behbahani, M.; Mohabatkar, H.; Nosrati, M. Analysis and comparison of lignin peroxidases between fungi and bacteria using three different modes of Chou’s general pseudo amino acid composition. J. Theor. Biol. 2016, 411, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sasaki, K.; Morita, M.; Sasaki, D.; Nagaoka, J.; Matsumoto, N.; Ohmura, N.; Shinozaki, H. Syntrophic degradation of proteinaceous materials by the thermophilic strains Coprothermobacter proteolyticus and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Gagliano, M.; Braguglia, C.; Gianico, A.; Mininni, G.; Nakamura, K.; Rossetti, S. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thermal pretreated sludge: Role of microbial community structure and correlation with process performances. Water Res. 2015, 68, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zverlov, V.V.; Schwarz, W.H. Bacterial Cellulose Hydrolysis in Anaerobic Environmental Subsystems—Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium stercorarium, Thermophilic Plant-fiber Degraders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1125, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sanchez-Ledesma, L.M.; Ramírez-Malule, H.; Rodríguez-Victoria, J.A. Volatile fatty acids production by acidogenic fermentation of wastewater: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Blumer-Schuette, S.E.; Ozdemir, I.; Mistry, D.; Lucas, S.; Lapidus, A.; Cheng, J.-F.; Goodwin, L.A.; Pitluck, S.; Land, M.L.; Hauser, L.J. Complete genome sequences for the anaerobic, extremely thermophilic plant biomass-degrading bacteria Caldicellulosiruptor hydrothermalis, Caldicellulosiruptor kristjanssonii, Caldicellulosiruptor kronotskyensis, Caldicellulosiruptor owensensis, and Caldicellulosiruptor lactoaceticus. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1483–1484. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  185. Jiang, C.; Peces, M.; Andersen, M.H.; Kucheryavskiy, S.; Nierychlo, M.; Yashiro, E.; Andersen, K.S.; Kirkegaard, R.H.; Hao, L.; Høgh, J. Characterizing the growing microorganisms at species level in 46 anaerobic digesters at Danish wastewater treatment plants: A six-year survey on microbial community structure and key drivers. Water Res. 2021, 193, 116871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Vítězová, M.; Kohoutová, A.; Vítěz, T.; Hanišáková, N.; Kushkevych, I. Methanogenic microorganisms in industrial wastewater anaerobic treatment. Processes 2020, 8, 1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Brannan, D.K.; Caldwell, D.E. Thermothrix thiopara: Growth and metabolism of a newly isolated thermophile capable of oxidizing sulfur and sulfur compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 40, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Afzal Ghauri, M.; Johnson, D.B. Physiological diversity amongst some moderately thermophilic iron-oxidising bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1991, 85, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Etique, M.; Jorand, F.d.r.P.; Zegeye, A.; Grégoire, B.; Despas, C.; Ruby, C. Abiotic process for Fe (II) oxidation and green rust mineralization driven by a heterotrophic nitrate reducing bacteria (Klebsiella mobilis). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3742–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zeldes, B.M.; Loder, A.J.; Counts, J.A.; Haque, M.; Widney, K.A.; Keller, L.M.; Albers, S.V.; Kelly, R.M. Determinants of sulphur chemolithoautotrophy in the extremely thermoacidophilic Sulfolobales. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3696–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Song, H.; Choi, O.; Pandey, A.; Kim, Y.G.; Joo, J.S.; Sang, B.-I. Simultaneous production of methane and acetate by thermophilic mixed culture from carbon dioxide in bioelectrochemical system. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. De Vrieze, J.; Smet, D.; Klok, J.; Colsen, J.; Angenent, L.T.; Vlaeminck, S.E. Thermophilic sludge digestion improves energy balance and nutrient recovery potential in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wollmann, F.; Dietze, S.; Ackermann, J.U.; Bley, T.; Walther, T.; Steingroewer, J.; Krujatz, F. Microalgae wastewater treatment: Biological and technological approaches. Eng. Life Sci. 2019, 19, 860–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ostroumov, S.; Shestakova, T.; Tropin, I. Biosorption of copper by biomass of extremophilic algae. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2015, 85, 2961–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Shen, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Fan, L.; Chen, R.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Zeng, W. A high-efficiency Fe2O3@ Microalgae composite for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. De-Bashan, L.E.; Bashan, Y. Immobilized microalgae for removing pollutants: Review of practical aspects. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1611–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Leong, Y.K.; Huang, C.-Y.; Chang, J.-S. Pollution prevention and waste phycoremediation by algal-based wastewater treatment technologies: The applications of high-rate algal ponds (HRAPs) and algal turf scrubber (ATS). J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 296, 113193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Maad, A.; Aljerf, L.; AlJerf, A.; Dayoob, C.; Sukkar, A.; Alajlani, M. A Cross-Sectional Study on Demographic Characteristics, Nutritional Knowledge, and Supplement Use Patterns. Int. J. Kinesiol. Sports Sci. 2024, 12, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Al-Jabri, H.; Das, P.; Khan, S.; Thaher, M.; AbdulQuadir, M. Treatment of wastewaters by microalgae and the potential applications of the produced biomass—A review. Water 2020, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Cheng, F.; Mallick, K.; Gedara, S.M.H.; Jarvis, J.M.; Schaub, T.; Jena, U.; Nirmalakhandan, N.; Brewer, C.E. Hydrothermal liquefaction of Galdieria sulphuraria grown on municipal wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Pleissner, D.; Händel, N. Algae Cultivation as Measure for the Sanitation of Organic Waste—A Case Study Based on the Alga Galdieria sulphuraria Grown on Food Waste Hydrolysate in a Continuous Flow Culture. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Guo, G.; Hao, J.; Tian, F.; Liu, C.; Ding, K.; Zhang, C.; Yang, F.; Xu, J. Decolorization of Metanil Yellow G by a halophilic alkalithermophilic bacterial consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 316, 123923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Renuka, N.; Sood, A.; Prasanna, R.; Ahluwalia, A. Phycoremediation of wastewaters: A synergistic approach using microalgae for bioremediation and biomass generation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 1443–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Qu, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ho, S.-H. Optimizing real swine wastewater treatment with maximum carbohydrate production by a newly isolated indigenous microalga Parachlorella kessleri QWY28. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Alalawy, A.I.; Yang, Y.; Almutairi, F.M.; El Rabey, H.A.; Al-Duais, M.A.; Abomohra, A.; Salama, E.-S. Freshwater microalgae-based wastewater treatment under abiotic. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Hena, S.; Gutierrez, L.; Croué, J.-P. Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater using microalgae: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 124041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Keyword Co-occurrence Network Map for Extremophilic Wastewater Treatment and Similar Research.
Figure 1. Keyword Co-occurrence Network Map for Extremophilic Wastewater Treatment and Similar Research.
Sustainability 17 02339 g001
Figure 2. Top 10 academic institutions by number of relevant research articles.
Figure 2. Top 10 academic institutions by number of relevant research articles.
Sustainability 17 02339 g002
Figure 3. Map illustrating the global distribution of scientific production.
Figure 3. Map illustrating the global distribution of scientific production.
Sustainability 17 02339 g003
Figure 4. Line chart of the most cited countries for scientific research.
Figure 4. Line chart of the most cited countries for scientific research.
Sustainability 17 02339 g004
Figure 5. Line graph showing related author’s publishing distribution by nation.
Figure 5. Line graph showing related author’s publishing distribution by nation.
Sustainability 17 02339 g005
Figure 6. Line graph illustrating the rise in scientific article output per nation over time.
Figure 6. Line graph illustrating the rise in scientific article output per nation over time.
Sustainability 17 02339 g006
Figure 7. Adaptation mechanism of acidophilic substances for survival at acidic pH.
Figure 7. Adaptation mechanism of acidophilic substances for survival at acidic pH.
Sustainability 17 02339 g007
Figure 8. Alkaliphiles’ role in wastewater treatment.
Figure 8. Alkaliphiles’ role in wastewater treatment.
Sustainability 17 02339 g008
Figure 9. Halophilic mechanisms in saline environment.
Figure 9. Halophilic mechanisms in saline environment.
Sustainability 17 02339 g009
Figure 10. Use of extremophilic microalgae in wastewater treatment.
Figure 10. Use of extremophilic microalgae in wastewater treatment.
Sustainability 17 02339 g010
Table 1. Examples of different acidophiles in organic pollutant treatment.
Table 1. Examples of different acidophiles in organic pollutant treatment.
DomainAcidophilesOrganic PollutantsDegradation %DurationReferences
BacteriaAcidocella sp. WJB-3Aliphatic acid (dodecanoic acid)85%7 days[67]
Pseudomonas putida S16(genetically modified)Benzoate90%5 days[66]
Acidosphaera sp. C197Dodecane, Hexadecane75%10 days[68]
Acidocella sp. LGS-3Dodecane, hexadecane78%10 days[69]
Acidocella sp. IS10Naphthalene80%6 days[70]
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain AJH1, AcidiphiliumPAHs82%12 days[59]
Acidiphilium, Acidocella, AcidisphaeraPetroleum oil87%14 days[71]
Mycobacterium montefiorensePhenanthrene, pyrene85%8 days[72]
ArchaeonS. solfataricus 98/2Phenol70%5 days[63]
YeastZymomonas mobilis (ZM1)Phenol72%4 days[62]
Candida digboiensis TERI ASN6Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs)90%15 days[65]
FungiExophiala oligospermaToluene80%6 days[73]
Exophiala jeanselmeiStyrene85%7 days[74]
Paecilomyces variotiiToluene83%6 days[75]
Phanerocheate chrysosporiumToluene88%8 days[76]
Exophiala lecanii-corniToluene, ethylbenzene, benzene, styrene90%10 days[77]
Table 3. Examples of different alkaliphiles and their pollutants.
Table 3. Examples of different alkaliphiles and their pollutants.
DomainAlkaliphilesPollutantsRemoval %DurationReferences
Organic Pollutants
BacteriaCitricoccus alkalitolerans CSB1Tannery effluents (COD, BOD, total chromium)80–85%10 days[38]
Bacillus sp.Phenol90%7 days[112,113,114]
Pseudomonas and Bacillus strainsPAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons)75–88%12–15 days[115,116,117,118]
Halanaerobium lacipiscisNOx-N, NH3-N80%14 days[119]
Halomonas, MarinobacterHigh salinity and heavy metals70–85%12 days[36]
Pseudomonas putidao-nitro-benzaldehyde (ONBA)85%8 days[120]
Alkaliphilic Bacillus sp.Chromium (Cr VI)90%6 days[121]
Halomonas campisalisBenzoate and Salicylate88%10 days[122]
Bacillus sp. Bacillus circulansTextile dyes80%12 days[123]
ArchaeaAlkaliphilic Pseudomonas sp.Industrial effluents75%14 days[124]
BacteriaThioalkalivibrio spp. (Thioalkalivibrio halophilus, Thioalkalivibrio versutus)Sulfides, polysulfides, thiosulfates, tetrathionates, thiocyanates80–85%15 days[125,126]
Ectothiorhodospira magna, Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikoviiZinc, lead, copper (via sulfide oxidation to sulfur)90%7 days[127,128]
Bacillus spp.Cr6+ (Chromium reduction to Cr3+)80% [129]
ArchaeaMethanobacteria and MethanomicrobiaMethanogenesis in high-strength organic wastewaters75% CH4 yield20 days[130]
Methanosarcinamethanogenesis and ammonia oxidation18 days400 mg/L COD[131]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anabtawi, H.M.; Ikhlaq, A.; Kumar, S.; Rafique, S.; Aly Hassan, A. Addressing Challenges for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Solutions Using Extremophile Microorganisms. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062339

AMA Style

Anabtawi HM, Ikhlaq A, Kumar S, Rafique S, Aly Hassan A. Addressing Challenges for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Solutions Using Extremophile Microorganisms. Sustainability. 2025; 17(6):2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anabtawi, Hassan Mohamad, Amir Ikhlaq, Sandeep Kumar, Safa Rafique, and Ashraf Aly Hassan. 2025. "Addressing Challenges for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Solutions Using Extremophile Microorganisms" Sustainability 17, no. 6: 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062339

APA Style

Anabtawi, H. M., Ikhlaq, A., Kumar, S., Rafique, S., & Aly Hassan, A. (2025). Addressing Challenges for Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Solutions Using Extremophile Microorganisms. Sustainability, 17(6), 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop