Next Article in Journal
Insights from the Application of Computer-Aided Mapping Technology in Chinese Education for Urban Forestry
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Future Water Stress on Surface Waters in the West Kazakhstan Region Caused by the Combined Impacts of Climate Change and Increased Anthropogenic Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Government-Led Digital Governance and the Digital Divide Among Cities: Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation in China

1
School of Public Administration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
School of Politics and Public Administration, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(23), 10700; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310700 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 October 2025 / Revised: 22 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025

Abstract

Drawing on panel data from 279 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2022, this study employs the National Pilot Policy of Information Benefiting the People (NPIB) as a quasi-natural experiment to examine how government-led digital governance shapes the digital divide among cities. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) design combined with mediation and spatial analyses, the results demonstrate that the NPIB policy significantly narrowed inter-city digital disparities, with findings robust across alternative model specifications and placebo tests. Mechanism analysis shows that digital governance promotes inclusion primarily through three pathways: strengthening strategic policy orientation, enhancing technological innovation capacity, and stimulating digital market vitality. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that policy effects vary by regional development, urbanization level, and fiscal autonomy, being most pronounced in eastern cities and those with moderate urbanization and fiscal self-sufficiency. Spatial analysis reveals that while digital governance improves local inclusion, it can generate negative spillovers among neighboring cities with similar economic structures, partially offsetting aggregate gains. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of regionally differentiated strategies, cross-regional coordination, and sustained investment in digital infrastructure to promote balanced, inclusive, and sustainable digital transformation—providing practical insights for developing countries aiming to bridge structural divides and advance digital sustainability.
Keywords: digital governance; urban digital divide; Information Benefit to the People pilot program; Difference-in-Differences (DID); mediating effect; spatial effect digital governance; urban digital divide; Information Benefit to the People pilot program; Difference-in-Differences (DID); mediating effect; spatial effect

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Wu, S.; Dong, Y.; Jiang, M. Government-Led Digital Governance and the Digital Divide Among Cities: Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation in China. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310700

AMA Style

Zhang C, Wu S, Dong Y, Jiang M. Government-Led Digital Governance and the Digital Divide Among Cities: Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation in China. Sustainability. 2025; 17(23):10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310700

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Changping, Shuai Wu, Yingying Dong, and Menghan Jiang. 2025. "Government-Led Digital Governance and the Digital Divide Among Cities: Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation in China" Sustainability 17, no. 23: 10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310700

APA Style

Zhang, C., Wu, S., Dong, Y., & Jiang, M. (2025). Government-Led Digital Governance and the Digital Divide Among Cities: Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation in China. Sustainability, 17(23), 10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310700

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop