Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai

Wu, Wen-Jia; Li, Yan-He; Yang, Hao-Rong; Zhao, Ai-Lian; Zhang, Hao

doi:10.3390/su172210199

Open AccessArticle

Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai

by

Wen-Jia Wu

^1,*,

Yan-He Li

¹,

Hao-Rong Yang

¹,

Ai-Lian Zhao

² and

Hao Zhang

^1,*

¹

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Jiangwan Campus, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200438, China

²

China Power Engineering Consulting Group, East China Electric Power Design Institute (ECEPDI), Shanghai 200063, China

^*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10199; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210199

Submission received: 22 September 2025 / Revised: 29 October 2025 / Accepted: 11 November 2025 / Published: 14 November 2025

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Designing for Urban Green Infrastructure: Mitigating Heat Islands and Enhancing Well-Being)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

In many newly industrialized countries, the booming industrial parks have played a crucial role in propelling urban growth, promoting socioeconomic growth, and causing environmental deterioration. This study investigated land use/land cover (LULC) transformation and thermal effects of the “104 Industrial Blocks” in Shanghai, which have been the key industrial development zones since 1995. A total of 64 industrial clusters were identified by merging industrial parks with close spatial linkages. Subsequently, using a data-driven framework that contains data generated from Landsat series C2L2 images and auxiliary datasets, we analyzed land development patterns and associated anomalous thermal response across three scales: macro-level pattern, meso-level ring, and local scale. The results indicate that industrial growth in the downtown shifted from incremental expansion to stock renewal. Suburban areas became the main destinations for industrial relocation. Consequently, the thermal environment underwent a remarkable reconfiguration. Urban heat island (UHI) intensity declined in the downtown, while industrial clusters on the urban periphery emerged as newly emerging heat sources. Around 75% of suburban industrial parks have shifted from low- to medium/high-density patterns, creating new industrial heat islands. In contrast, only 20.31% of suburban industrial parks have shifted from low- to medium-density development without resulting in new urban heat islands.

Keywords:

urban growth; urban heat island effect; land use; industrial plots; suburban urbanization

1. Introduction

Since the industrial revolution, global urbanization has attracted large-scale population migration from rural to urban areas. The proportion of the world’s urban population rose rapidly from 25% in 1950 to 56% in 2020 and is projected to exceed 70% by 2070 [1]. Urbanization has triggered a series of ecological and environmental crises. On the one hand, urbanization has profoundly altered land use structures. This is characterised by the dominance of impervious surfaces associated with industrial production, transportation, commercial, and residential uses. As a result, natural and semi-natural surfaces (e.g., green spaces and water bodies) have declined. Impervious surfaces such as buildings and hardtop pavements are characterized by low heat capacity, low albedo, and high thermal conductivity [2]. In addition, the dense concentration of high-rise buildings increases surface roughness, while irregular building configurations obstruct urban ventilation corridors. These factors substantially alter surface thermal inertia, energy flux distribution, energy exchange mechanisms, atmospheric circulation, and precipitation patterns [3,4]. Consequently, cities experience higher temperatures than surrounding suburban areas, a thermal anomaly known as the urban heat island (UHI) effect [5,6]. On the other hand, greenhouse gas emissions associated with urbanization exacerbate global climate change. Heatwaves occurring worldwide exert negative impacts on public health, economic development, and ecosystems [7,8,9]. As a result, the combined impact of UHI and climate change is becoming increasingly apparent [10,11,12]. This dynamic severely undermines urban adaptive capacity to climate change, particularly in megacities such as Shanghai. Therefore, enhancing urban climate resilience has become an urgent task [13,14,15].

As spatial carriers of urban growth, industrial parks reshape urban land use patterns through their expansion and transformation. With the acceleration of industrialization, increasing attention has been paid to the thermal anomalies induced by industrial parks [16,17]. Highly impervious surface structures alter regional thermal radiation balance and energy distribution, thereby exacerbating the vulnerability of urban ecosystems [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Existing studies have primarily focused on the thermal environmental effects of specific industry types or industrial cities. For example, Meng [20] found that land surface temperature (LST) in large steel parks was significantly higher than in surrounding areas. A pronounced centre-to-periphery decreasing pattern was identified, with the spring and summer seasons and anthropogenic heat emissions emerging as the primary influencing factors. Liu [24], using machine learning methods, proposed that optimizing plant morphology and production processes could mitigate extreme heat islands. This provided evidence for improving the thermal environment of industrial cities. Mao [25] emphasized that the scale and spatial configuration of different types of industrial and mining land exert differentiated impacts on LST. Industrial activities have been confirmed as important drivers of local urban heat islands. Research indicates that the anthropogenic heat emissions account for more than 30% of the total urban heat flux [26].

In this study, we selected Greater Shanghai, one of leading mega cities in China, as a typical case to exemplify the relationship between industrial restructuring and the associated industrial heat island effect. Shanghai had been the biggest industrial city in China over the past four decades. The industrial heat island effect had been a tangled environmental issue. It contributed to the expansion of the urban land influenced by the UHI effect, particularly during the rural–urban transformation accelerated by suburban industrialization [27,28,29]. Since the 1990s, with economic restructuring and the implementation of land renewal policies, a large proportion of traditional industrial land in Shanghai’s central districts has been gradually transformed into commercial, residential, and public service functions. Meanwhile, suburban areas absorbed relocated industries, giving rise to large-scale industrial parks and bases such as Lingang, Jiading, and Songjiang. The strategies of “retreating from secondary to tertiary industries” and “industrial agglomeration within designated parks” not only promoted more intensive economic development but also significantly altered the characteristics of the urban underlying surface. These changes collectively influenced surface radiation balance and local thermal circulation, leading to pronounced spatial differentiation of the UHI effect [29,30]. Several studies have been conducted on the industrial UHI effect in Shanghai, utilizing satellite thermal remote sensing data. These studies focus on cause-and-effect relationships between socioeconomic factors (e.g., population density), land development metrics (e.g., impervious surface), and biophysical indices (e.g., the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) [31,32,33,34]. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research focused on how intensive industrial park development impacts the thermal environment of these industrial parks and their surrounding areas—such as cropland, villages, and infrastructure—with a specific emphasis on quantitative analysis. In particular, empirical research based on long-term, multi-source remote sensing data and spatial statistical methods at the scale of industrial parcels is still lacking in addressing the land use–thermal effect nexus. A critical gap remains unanswered: how does the thermal response evolve as low-density, peri-urban industrial parks morph into medium- or high-density clusters under polycentric planning policies? The question of how industrial development patterns influence LST has thus become a prominent issue in the field of urban climatology, with implications for urban adaptation to climate change.

This study aims to construct a data-driven analytical framework to systematically compare the relationships between industrial development patterns and thermal environmental responses in Shanghai between 1995 and 2022. The research focuses on three main aspects: (1) analyzing the characteristics of multi-scale land use structure changes; (2) revealing the intrinsic relationship between land use patterns and thermal environmental responses in Shanghai; and (3) investigating how industrial development modes of parks and clusters contribute to variations in LST. Through spatial and statistical analyses, this study quantitatively uncovers the mechanisms by which the thermal environment of industrial parks responds to built environment indicators. This provides scientific evidence in support of the sustainable development and management of industrial parks, the mitigation of the UHI effect, and the enhancement of urban climate resilience in Shanghai.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

2.1.1. Basic Information

Shanghai (120°51′–122°12′ E, 30°40′–31°53′ N), located on the eastern edge of the Yangtze River Delta, is a world-class metropolis characterized by economic prosperity and vigorous industrial development. The city has a north subtropical monsoon climate, with four distinct seasons, abundant sunshine, and generally mild and humid conditions [35]. Benefiting from its well-developed industrial system and extensive employment opportunities, Shanghai has attracted a large influx of population. Between 1995 and 2022, the permanent resident population increased from 14.14 million to 24.76 million. Meanwhile, as one of China’s major industrial hubs, Shanghai reported an industrial output above the designated scale of 3939.96 billion RMB in 2023, ranking among the highest nationwide [36].

This study focuses on the “104 Industrial Blocks”, which are the key industrial development zones fostered by local governments to promote intensive land use since the latest industrial restructuring initiated in 1995. These industrial blocks concentrate on six strategic sectors: electronic information, life and health, automotive, advanced equipment, new materials, and fashion consumer goods. It is estimated that almost 80% of industrial parks fall within these categories [37].

2.1.2. Spatial Aggregation Rules and Buffers

For the purpose of systematic and concise analysis, several industrial parks with strong spatial agglomeration and industrial linkages were consolidated into industrial clusters (ICs). The criteria for generating ICs encompass the geographical characteristics of the industrial plot’s location, shared transport resources, industrial sector classification, and upstream and downstream industrial chain connections. Furthermore, buffer zones were delineated around each park boundary to capture the spatial extent of their developmental influence. The determination principle is based on the park’s area and the LULC of surrounding areas. Generally, large IPs/ICs located in a sparsely populated area may have more far-reaching impacts, while an industrial park situated in a densely built-up area is constrained by existing development. Ultimately, 104 industrial parks (including both core areas and buffer zones) were aggregated into 43 industrial parks (IPs) and 21 industrial clusters (ICs). The spatial distribution and customized coding of these parks are shown in Figure 1, with detailed information provided in Table A1.

2.2. Data Sources

The primary dataset used in this study consists of Landsat Collection 2 Level 2 (C2L2) imagery from 1995 to 2022, which has undergone atmospheric correction. Images were preferentially selected based on temporal uniformity, low cloud coverage, high radiometric quality, and acquisition dates within June-September to capture the summer season.

In addition, several auxiliary datasets were employed, including commercial urban GIS thematic layers, open-source land use classification products, GF-1 WFV imagery, OpenStreetMap urban geographic layers, historical imagery from Tianditu and Google Earth, and Sentinel-2 imagery. Detailed descriptions of all datasets are provided in Table 1.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Data Processing

The general preprocessing workflow for remote sensing data typically includes radiometric calibration, atmospheric correction, projection transformation, image mosaicking, and clipping. They ensure the consistency and comparability of multi-source datasets [42]. The specific procedures can be selected based on the dataset specifications and the application context. In this study, all datasets were converted to the WGS 1984 geodetic coordinate system and projected using the UTM Zone 50N Universal Transverse Mercator projection [38].

2.3.2. Land Use/Land Cover Classification

Accurate acquisition of LULC data is essential for assessing urban growth and identifying the intrinsic relationships between LULC and UHI effects. Considering the characteristics of the study area, LULC in Shanghai was classified into four categories: developed land, vegetated land, water, and tidal land (Table 2). The maximum likelihood supervised classification (MLC) method determines the category of each pixel by extracting the spectral characteristics of known sample pixels [42]. MLC offers efficient information utilization, high classification accuracy, and good scalability. It is a mature classification approach available in most remote sensing software.

The classification procedure is as follows. First, based on preprocessed remote sensing images, standard false-color composite images were generated using bands suitable for interpretation to fully represent surface features. Second, 100–120 random points per LULC category were selected through visual interpretation to construct representative training samples. Third, MLC was applied to generate LULC maps for five selected years, with an overall classification accuracy ranging between 79.71 and 81.92%. The error matrices, overall accuracy, user’s accuracy, and producer’s accuracy for the five-year LULC maps are provided in Table A2 and Table A3. It should be emphasized that, although the Kappa index is commonly used to evaluate classification accuracy, Pontius and Millones argued that this metric has significant limitations [43]. Therefore, this study did not employ the Kappa index. Moreover, we tried many times but were unable to achieve satisfactory accuracy with the MLC algorithm alone. Thus, the post-classification products were converted into editable polygons and then manually refined using auxiliary datasets. These datasets have two primary data sources, as outlined in Table 1: (1) high-resolution satellite imagery, including Sentinel-2 with a spatial resolution of 10 m and GF-1 WFV with a spatial resolution of 16 m, and (2) the commercial urban thematic layer of Shanghai (Table 1). In particular, we corrected numerous polygons that had been misclassified as tidal land by validating them against the reference datasets. Subsequently, the second accuracy assessment of these manually corrected products utilized a stratified random sampling method to ensure the spatial representativeness of the validation dataset. Sample points were strategically distributed to encompass all concentric urban zones within the study area, ranging from the urban core to suburban and exurban areas, as well as the surrounding regions of major IP/ICs. Specifically, 120–150 validation sample points were designated for each LULC category. This approach resulted in a total sample size of 520 to 600 points for each year. To ensure reliable validation, each sample point’s actual LULC category was verified using the above-mentioned auxiliary datasets. Each sample point’s true LULC category was confirmed through field verification or visual interpretation using the aforementioned high-resolution datasets. Finally, this process significantly improved the classification accuracy of the post-classification products. Overall, the five-year post-classification products achieved classification accuracies ranging from 92.3% to 95.6% (see Table A4 and Table A5).

2.3.3. Generation of Quality-Enhanced LST

As a key parameter for LST retrieval, the accurate estimation of land surface emissivity (LSE) is critical [44]. Common methods for estimating LSE can be categorized into two types: the Classification-Based Emissivity Method (CBEM) [45,46] and P_v-Based Emissivity Method (PBEM) [47,48]. CBEM assigns emissivity values according to predetermined land cover classes. However, it is impossible to effectively reflect the impact of seasonal variations, vegetation growth cycles, and transitional surface conditions (e.g., similarity between fallow land and bare soil). In contrast, PBEM can more accurately represent the dynamic variations in surface radiation, effectively addressing mixed-pixel issues [49,50].

Considering these factors, this study employed the NDVI-threshold-based improved method proposed by Qin [51] to estimate LSE. The specific formula is as follows:

N D V I = (\frac{{B a n d}_{N I R} - {B a n d}_{R e d}}{{B a n d}_{N I R} + {B a n d}_{R e d}})

(1)

P_{V} = {(\frac{N D V I - N D V I_{m i n}}{N D V I_{m a x} - N D V I_{m i n}})}^{2}

(2)

where NDVI denotes the normalized difference vegetation index, while Band_NIR and Band_Red represent the atmospherically corrected surface reflectance values of the near-infrared and red bands, respectively. P_v refers to the fractional vegetation cover, and NDVI_min and NDVI_max correspond to the minimum and maximum NDVI values.

Based on the P_v range, the corresponding LSE (ε) was calculated for three surface categories: water bodies, natural surfaces, and urban areas (Table 3).

Based on the radiative transfer equation, given the land surface emissivity, atmospheric transmittance, downwelling atmospheric radiation, and upwelling atmospheric radiation, the blackbody radiance in the thermal infrared band, B_λ (T_s) can be derived.

Since real-time atmospheric profile data for the study area are unavailable, the atmospheric parameters in Equation (3) were obtained from the Landsat-5/7/8/9 C2 L2 parameter images. These were then divided by the scaling factor prior to application.

B_{λ} (T_{s}) = \frac{L_{s e n s o r, λ} - L_{a t m, λ}^{↑} - τ_{λ} (1 - ε_{λ}) L_{a t m, λ}^{↓}}{τ_{λ} ε_{λ}}

(3)

where T_s is the land surface radiometric temperature in Kelvin (K); B_λ(T_s) is the Planck blackbody radiance at temperature T_s (units: W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·µm⁻¹); L_sensor,λ is the radiance measured by the thermal infrared band of each sensor, also in W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·µm⁻¹; ε_λ is the land surface emissivity; τ_λ is the total atmospheric transmittance along the sensor path (dimensionless); L^↑_atm,λ denotes the upwelling atmospheric radiance (units: W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·µm⁻¹); and L^↓_atm,λ is the downwelling atmospheric radiance (units: W·m⁻²·sr⁻¹·µm⁻¹).

After obtaining the B_λ(T_s) in the thermal infrared band, the land surface temperature based on P_v-Based Emissivity Method (LST_PBEM) was derived using the inverse function of Planck’s law, as shown in Equation (4). Finally, the LST was corrected according to actual conditions and location information, and outliers were removed to obtain the calibrated land surface temperature. All data processing was implemented in R (v4.5.0) (the corresponding code was available in the Supplementary Materials).

{L S T}_{P B E M} = \frac{K_{2}}{\ln (1 + \frac{K_{1}}{B (T)})}

(4)

where K₁ and K₂ are the thermal conversion constants of the Landsat 5/7/8/9 thermal infrared bands, as provided in the image metadata files [38,39].

Additionally, the study also compared LST_PBEM with LST_C2, the latter being the Landsat-embedded surface temperature product. Interestingly, random point sampling indicated that LST_C2 values were generally higher than LST_PBEM. This is attributed to a global-scale LSE being employed by LST_C2. The complexity of urban areas can significantly affect the accuracy of fine-scale LST data. Therefore, LST_C2 was not suitable for studies in highly urbanized regions. Considering the limitations of LST_C2 and LST_CBEM, the subsequent analysis employed LST_PBEM. Correlation analysis between LST_PBEM, LST_CBEM, and LST_C2 was presented in Figure A1.

2.3.4. Construction of an Indicator System for Thermal Environment Drivers

The spatial heterogeneity of UHI effects in industrial parks arises from the synergistic interactions between land use changes and human activities [52,53]. To systematically assess land development of the IP/ICs on the thermal environment, an evaluation model was established based on land use indicators, socio-environmental metrics, spatial location attributes, and economic activity indicators (Table 4).

2.3.5. Statistical Analysis

Prior to examining the relationship between built environment predictor variables and LST response variables, exploratory data analysis (EDA) was conducted. First, excluding two categorical variables—Distance and Industrial Type, five built environment indicators (independent variables) and LST were tested for normality. The results indicated that the continuous variables generally exhibited skewed distributions. For this reason, Spearman’s rank correlation is used to analyze the correlation between seven dependent variables and LST.

Second, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was employed to perform Q-type clustering of the IPs/ICs as whole units. Complete linkage, average linkage, and centroid linkage methods were applied, with Euclidean distance used as the metric for comparison [54]. To validate the robustness of our HCA results and reduce subjectivity in cluster number selection, we added Silhouette Coefficients (assessing cohesion/separation) and Gap Statistics (compared to null distributions) using the library (cluster) and library (factoextra) in R (v4.5.0) across all five study years. As shown in Table 5, for all years, Silhouette coefficients exceeded 0.6 (peaked 0.72 in 2015), indicating strong within-cluster similarity and clear between-cluster differentiation for 6 IP/ICs categories. The Gap Statistic peaked at k = 6 clusters for all study years (e.g., Gap = 0.89 in 2022), providing statistical justification for our choice of six IP/IC types—rejecting alternative cluster numbers (k = 4 or k = 8) where gaps declined by ≥20%.

Moreover, to address transparency in cluster formation, we have included complete dendrograms for all three HCA linkage methods (complete, average, centroid) and explicitly documented our cutting criteria (Table 6). The Cutting criteria (triangulated for objectivity) briefly include: 1) Elbow method: sharp slowdown in dissimilarity increase (e.g., 2015: distance = 9.76, k = 6); 2) Gap Statistic: peaks at k = 6 for all years, rejecting over-clustering (k = 8, Gap decline >20%) or under-clustering (k = 4, Gap decline >15%); and 3) Domain relevance: aligns with Shanghai’s 6 strategic industrial sectors and observed LULC transitions from low- to high-density development. These additions are presented in Appendix A Figure A2, Figure A3, Figure A4, Figure A5, Figure A6, Figure A7, Figure A8, Figure A9, Figure A10, Figure A11, Figure A12, Figure A13, Figure A14, Figure A15 and Figure A16. For example, the 2015 complete-linkage dendrogram (Figure A11) shows a clear “elbow” at a distance of 9.76, where merging clusters further would abruptly reduce separation between high-density (Type I) and medium-high-density (Type II) IPs/ICs. This elbow aligns with the Gap Statistic’s peak at k = 6, confirming our cut-off choice. However, given the differences in clustering principles among these methods, some variations in the dendrograms were inevitable. Therefore, manual override for the HCA categories is necessary. Summary of manual overrides and their rationale were listed in Table 6. For inconsistency identification, we cross-compared cluster assignments from the three HCA linkage methods. An IP/IC was flagged if it was assigned to different clusters by ≥2 methods (e.g., IC-12-3: average linkage = Type III, centroid linkage = Type IV in 2007). Subsequently, for ground-truthing, the flagged IP/ICs were validated using high-resolution LULC data and satellite images (Table 2) to check for mismatches between statistical clustering and actual land use (e.g., a “low-density” cluster assignment for an IP with 60% built-up area). Additionally, local industrial sector data [37] (Shanghai Statistical Bureau, 2022) was used to ensure alignment with functional type (e.g., a “fashion goods” IP incorrectly clustered with “heavy equipment” IPs).

Third, the Kruskal–Wallis (K-W) test was adopted to compare the variations in LSTs between the HCA categories in response to changes in land development patterns of the IPs/ICs. Specifically, the K-W test, as a non-parametric statistical method, evaluates whether the medians of multiple independent sample groups differ significantly. This method ranks the observations and computes the sum of ranks to assess differences among groups, using the H statistic for significance testing (Equations (5) and (6)).

R_{i} = \sum_{j = 1}^{n_{i}} r_{i j}

(5)

H = \frac{12}{N (N + 1)} \sum_{i = 1}^{k} \frac{R_{i}^{2}}{n_{i}} - 3 (N + 1)

(6)

where r_ij represents the rank of the j-th observation in the group, N denotes the total number of observations across all groups, k is the number of groups, R_i is the sum of ranks for the i group, and n_i is the sample size of the i-th group.

Finally, for groups exhibiting significant differences, Dunn’s post hoc test was performed for pairwise comparisons (Equation (7)).

Z_{i j} = \frac{R_{i} - R_{j}}{\sqrt{\frac{N (N + 1)}{12} (\frac{1}{n_{i}} - \frac{1}{n_{j}})}}

(7)

where R_i and R_j denote the sums of ranks for the i-th and j-th groups, respectively; N represents the total sample size across all groups, and n_i and n_j are the sample sizes of the i-th and j-th groups, respectively.

The Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn multiple comparisons were conducted using library (agricolae) and library (dunn.test) in the R statistical software (version 4.5.0) [55].

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Land Use Pattern Changes

The land use transition matrix method was employed to examine land inflows and outflows, revealing the dynamics of land use type changes in Shanghai (Figure 2). At the macro-urban scale, Shanghai’s urbanization since 1995 can be divided into four distinct stages (Table 7): Stage-1/S1, a period of slow urbanization (1995–2001); Stage-2/S2, a phase of rapid urbanization (2001–2007); Stage-3/S3, a stage of explosive growth (2007–2015); and Stage-4/S4, a period of decelerated growth (2015–2022).

Table 8 and Figure 3 present the changes in the area and proportion of developed land at the concentric zone scale from 1995 to 2022. Within IPs/ICs, the middle-ring area consistently serves as the core zone for industrial land concentration, with its proportion rising from 40.07% in 1995 to 60.06% in 2022. It has transitioned from a traditional industrial agglomeration area to high-tech-oriented industrial parks. These parks are dominated by industries such as electronics, information technology, and life sciences, including IP-18, IC-16-1, IC-16-2, IC-18-1, and IC-18-4. The outer-ring area has experienced the most significant expansion of industrial land, with the area increasing from 5032.35 ha to 23,041.26 ha and the proportion rising sharply from 11.47% to 52.51%. The data reflects the trend of industrial suburbanization. Key industries developed in this zone include life sciences, electronics and information, and high-end equipment manufacturing, exemplified by IC-5, IC-17, and IC-1. Industrial land growth in suburban and exurban areas has been relatively slower, reaching proportions of 36.15% and 29.85% in 2022. It indicates a gradual diffusion of industrial activity toward the urban periphery. Specifically, although suburban industrialization began later than in the outer ring, favorable policies and transportation advantages have allowed it to emerge as a new industrial growth zone. It contains the maximum industrial parks listed in the “104 Blocks,” which focus on equipment manufacturing and advanced materials industries, such as IC-2, IC-21, and IC-19. Industrial development in exurban areas has been relatively slow due to limitations in infrastructure and location. Nevertheless, abundant land resources and low costs have positioned these areas as strategic sites for heavy industries such as advanced equipment manufacturing and materials, including IC-9-1, IC-9-2, IC-9-3, IC-10-1, IC-10-2, IC-11-2, IC-11-3, and IC-20.

Overall, urbanization in Shanghai is primarily driven by the expansion of developed land, particularly the development of the IPs/ICs located in different urban rings. Figure 3 shows that industrial land closely aligns with urban developed areas, indicating a model of integrated industry and city development. As indicated, each urban ring has a specific role in this process. The urban core only keeps two key IPs/ICs. The Middle Ring area features intensive development of the IPs/ICs, while the Outer Ring acts as a hub for industries that are relocating from the Inner Ring. Meanwhile, suburban and exurban zones have become key areas for industrial growth.

3.2. Overall Patterns of Land Use/Land Cover Change and LST

Figure 4 shows that over the past three decades, the distribution pattern of the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect in Shanghai has exhibited significant changes, corresponding to the land use and land cover (LULC) changes presented in Figure 3. During the S1 period, the UHI effect was predominantly concentrated in the urban core, while the suburbs and exurban areas experienced relatively lower levels of UHI. In the S2 period, the UHI influence remained primarily in the urban core but began to expand to areas about 6 to 15 km from the city center. By the S3 period, the UHI effect had intensified, reaching a much wider area that included not only the urban core but also former peri-urban and rural regions 15 to 45 km from the city center, which included dense industrial zones. In the S4 period, the overall spread of areas impacted by the UHI effect significantly increased compared to the S3 period. However, areas located 25 to 45 km from the urban center, which contain numerous industrial clusters, saw a substantial increase in the UHI effect compared to previous years, emerging as the most pronounced newly UHI hotspots.

3.3. Analysis of the Relationship Between IPs/ICs Development Patterns and LST

Descriptive statistics of the IPs/ICs industrial pattern categories are provided in Table 9. From highest to lowest, they are classified as: high-density unbalanced development industrial areas (I), medium-high-density balanced development industrial areas (II), medium-density development industrial areas (III), moderately developed industrial areas (IV), medium-low-density development industrial areas (V), and low-density development industrial areas (VI).

Table 10 illustrates the correlation between five built environment factors and mean LSTs across the study period. As seen, there generally exist positively significant correlations among IC, PD, and RD as well as these three factors between the LST. These findings indicate that the expansion of intensive IP/ICs), along with their coupled population growth and road networks, acts as a dominant positive feedback mechanism at the fine scale, substantially elevating LST and exacerbating industrial heat island effects. In contrast, there exists a negatively significant correlation between VC, IC, PD, and RD as well as the LST. This result highlights that VC plays a key role in negatively feedbacking on the fine-scale these three factors. There also exists the overall negatively significant correlation between VC and WC though at the earlier stage they were positively correlated. Moreover, Regarding WC, its correlation with LST is statistically insignificant, which can be attributed to its limited areal proportion within the industrial landscape. Such a negligible share renders water bodies ineffective in modulating the fine-scale thermal regime, thereby having minimal influence on industrial heat island dynamics.

Table 11 presents the results of the Kruskal–Wallis (K-W) and Dunn tests for LSTs, confirming a statistically significant difference among IP/IC categories across different land development patterns. Together with Table 9, Figure 5 illustrates the temporal evolution of six categories of IPs/ICs from 1995 to 2022 in terms of their distribution and associated LSTs. The results reveal a clear upward trend in LST across all categories. Among them, Type I consistently exhibited the highest LST values, with an increase of nearly 9 °C, rising from 42.49 ± 1.47 °C in 1995 to 50.26 ± 2.33 °C in 2022. In contrast, during the early stage, the majority of IPs/ICs were characterized by low-density developments in suburban and exurban areas (Types V and VI), where LST levels were significantly lower than those of Type I. However, with the advancement of urbanization and industrialization, these parks gradually transformed into medium- and high-intensity developments. By around 2015, they had completely disappeared.

Specifically, IPs/ICs were still dominated by Types V and VI from 1995 to 2001. The mean LSTs of these types were significantly lower than those of Type I (p < 0.05), reflecting pronounced thermal disparities. By 2007, Type VI had almost vanished, and Type IV emerged. Type IV LST values fell between those of Types I and V, forming a clear gradient of thermal effects with increasing development intensity. In 2015, the number of Type II and III increased remarkedly, while Type V disappeared. The mean LSTs followed the order I > II > III > IV, with statistically significant differences. It suggested that medium- and high-intensity IPs/ICs had become major new sources of UHI. By 2022, IPs/ICs typology had further consolidated, comprising only Types I–III. Among these, Type III are the most prevalent, indicating continued development in near- and mid-suburban areas. Notably, the difference in LST between Type I (50.26 °C) and Type II (49.63 °C) was no longer statistically significant (p > 0.05). This result indicated that, under high-intensity development conditions, thermal effects tend to saturate. Nevertheless, Type III still maintained relatively lower LST levels (48.29 °C).

Overall, the findings demonstrate a significant positive association between the development intensity of IPs/ICs and LST. Over time, the thermal disparities between high-density and medium–high-density parks have become less pronounced.

4. Discussion

4.1. Impact of Industrial Suburbanization on LULC and UHI

Based on the sequence analysis of changes in LULC and LSTs addressed in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2, Shanghai’s urbanization exhibits four distinct developmental stages. This phased evolution aligns with the trajectories of many global megacities [55]. Yet Shanghai is distinguished by the high synchronicity of its industrialization and urbanization. Unlike early-developed cities such as Tokyo and New York, Shanghai experienced more rapid urban expansion. It completed the transition from a monocentric to a polycentric urban structure within just three decades [56,57].

From a spatial differentiation perspective, Shanghai displays a unique concentric development pattern characterized by central densification, outer-ring absorption, suburban extension, and peri-urban constraint. Industrial suburbanization has gradually shifted land development from the urban core to peri-urban areas. Specifically, the scarcity of urban land has prompted industrial upgrading and functional replacement in the core. Meanwhile, government-led industrial park planning has guided the outward relocation of manufacturing. Notably, the nearly tenfold increase in suburban built-up area highlights the pivotal role of industrial land expansion in Shanghai’s urban spatial restructuring.

Changes in LULC have directly shaped the spatial patterns of industrial UHIs. During the early stages (S1 and S2), the UHI effect was concentrated in the urban core, forming a monocentric pattern. This phenomenon resembles the initial thermal environment observed in other Chinese megacities, such as Beijing [58]. By S3 and S4, the emergence of new thermal cores around IPs/ICs led to a polycentric, dispersed industrial UHI pattern. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which demonstrated that industrial parks act as significant heat sources due to their high impervious surface coverage and high energy consumption [59,60].

4.2. IPs/ICs Development Patterns and Industrial UHIs

In this study, a multidimensional evaluation framework was used to classify IPs/ICs into six types, offering a novel perspective on the mechanisms underlying thermal response. The results indicate that the thermal effects of industrial parks vary significantly across types. For instance, Type I parks consistently exhibit the highest LST, averaging 6.36–7.94 °C higher than low-density Type VI parks. This disparity is primarily attributable to three factors: first, high-density development substantially reduces vegetation cover; second, increased industrial building density decreases the sky view factor, impeding longwave radiation cooling; and third, the large amount of anthropogenic heat emitted during industrial operations directly intensifies local warming.

It is noteworthy that LST has increased across all industrial development patterns in line with the global warming trend. However, the temperature differences among different park types have gradually narrowed. Notably, after 2015, the LST gap between the Categories I, II, and III IP/ICs decreased significantly. By 2022, the LST difference between I and II parks had reduced compared with earlier periods and was no longer statistically significant (p > 0.05). This trend is likely driven by several factors. On the one hand, industrial policies have required certain high-density industrial parks to reduce thermal emissions through technological upgrades. On the other hand, eco-industrial parks have improved local thermal environments by increasing the share of green spaces within them. Our findings are consistent with studies conducted in Shenzhen and Suzhou, which indicated that rational park planning and management can effectively mitigate industrial UHI effects [61].

At the temporal scale, the evolutionary trajectory of IPs/ICs types clearly reflects the process of industrial structural transformation. Shanghai has gradually shifted from labor-intensive manufacturing toward high-tech industries. However, this transformation has also introduced new environmental challenges: although the environmental pressure per unit area of output has declined, the thermal stress associated with land-intensive development continues to accumulate. The transition from predominantly low-density parks (VI) in the 1990s to a mixed composition dominated by medium- to high-density types (I-III) by 2022. Nevertheless, this trend highlights the trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality, as intensified land use exacerbates localized warming.

Here we tackle these questions for Shanghai, which is arguably one of the world’s fastest and largest laboratories of synchronized industrial and urban transition. By integrating 27 years of Landsat thermal imagery with a self-constructed, industrial-parcel database (104 blocks, 64 clusters), we provide a data-driven, multi-scalar dissection of how successive “retreat-from-core” policies and targeted park-upgrading programs have shifted the locus and intensity of industrial heat islands. The study’s central contribution is therefore not another UHI inventory, but a mechanistic account of how industrial restructuring—via land-use intensification, morphological change, and sectoral recomposition—re-wires the thermal circuitry of a mega-city.

4.3. Implications for Mitigating Industrial UHI Effects

The pronounced UHI patterns shifting from the urban core to the peri-urban area indicate that green renewal and infrastructure upgrades are beneficial for UHI mitigation in the urban core. Our findings revealed that the unbalanced land use structure, particularly the competitive land use patterns driven by physical and socioeconomic factors. Such competitive land use patterns result in dominant built environment factors, e.g., the considerably higher BAF, RD, and PD, for intensive growth of the IP/ICs, but the absence of green spaces and green-blue spaces (“green spaces plus blue corridors”). Besides, the overwhelming share of impervious surfaces—ranging from warehouses, workshops, and parking lots to hardtop pavements—stores solar heating, re-emits it, raises LSTs, and therefore causes surface warming. In the sense of thermal physical processes and consequences, several countermeasures should be considered as follows:

(1) Rationally improving the share of green spaces and green-blue spaces in the industrial landscape. Currently, in most IP/ICs, impervious surfaces occupy approximately 80% or more of the land use structure. It is impossible to change these unfavorable land-use patterns to increase the share of green and blue spaces. Thus, planar and vertical greening, such as green walls/curtains, vertical facades, and green roofs, should be practical options for shielding buildings from direct sunlight and increasing surface evapotranspiration rates [62]. Additionally, creating the water scape (e.g., ponds and creeks) and green spaces via sound ecological design. For instance, strengthening the vertical green volume, featuring a dense tree canopy, should provide better cooling potential than shrubs and turf. Furthermore, industrial parks are encouraged to install rooftop photovoltaic systems to provide electricity for the irrigation of vertical and rooftop greening during hot seasons [63].

(2) Optimizing land use structure and fine-scale building morphology. Notably, the preferred 1–2 storied light-steel roofs result in a dense building layout within intensive IP/ICs. We suggest that, except for the IP/ICs of heavy equipment manufacturers, other IP/ICs consider building 3–5-storey or higher buildings for factories, warehousing, and transportation facilities, expanding the building spacing. On the one hand, increasing the spacing between buildings can improve ventilation corridors, enhancing the microclimate and thermal comfort for occupants [64]. On the other hand, such an optimized building layout can free up more ecological land for green spaces and blue-green areas.

4.4. Limitations and Remarks

This study has several limitations. First, Landsat satellite imagery is subject to cloud cover and atmospheric pollution, limiting the number of high-quality images. Although five high-quality summer images were selected, it remains challenging to comprehensively capture the long-term dynamic impacts of industrial land use changes on the thermal environment. Second, due to the imagery’s 30-m spatial resolution and daytime imaging mode, fine-scale functional zoning within industrial parks could not be fully identified. Additionally, the industrial UHIs can only be detected via the upwelling thermal band signals within the instantaneous field of view (IFOV). Consequently, there are limitations in attributing thermal environmental variability at the local scale solely during daytime. Third, the role of socio-economic factors in shaping the land development patterns of the IP/ICs and their associated industrial UHIs was not adequately considered. For example, in peri-urban and exurban areas where land prices are lower, IP/ICs tend to expand horizontally, replacing large swaths of vegetated land and creating extensive, low-intensity industrial UHIs. In contrast, in high-land-value urban fringes, socioeconomic pressures drive vertical industrial development (e.g., multi-story factory buildings), which concentrates anthropogenic heat in smaller spatial footprints but leads to more intense localized warming. The lack of quantitative anthropogenic heat flux (Q_f) measurements—critical for closing the surface energy balance (SEB) in industrial zones—represents a key limitation. This gap hinders the precise quantification of how industrial activities (e.g., manufacturing processes, equipment operation) drive local thermal anomalies, thereby limiting the robustness of our conclusions regarding industrial UHI mitigation strategies.

Future research should address these gaps in several ways. Comparative studies across cities in different climatic zones could reveal regional variations in industrial heat island effects. Long-term monitoring using multi-source datasets would allow street-level, fine-scale analysis of the evolution of industrial UHIs, providing more targeted guidance for park planning. In practice, an integrated three-dimensional measurement, including the in situ/ground measurement of the LST, on-screen indicators (e.g., air temperature, relative humidity, and wind velocity), the unmanned vehicle-based platform, and the Internet-of-things-based sensors, should be established to collect the datasets and comprehensively assess the heterogeneity of the industrial UHI patterns [65]. For instance, with site-specific Q_f data (e.g., from eddy covariance systems, sensor networks, or industrial process-based emissions inventories), we can disentangle the relative contributions of Q_f versus natural SEB components (net radiation, sensible/latent heat fluxes) to industrial UHI intensification. Moreover, alongside these integrated platform-derived datasets, proxy estimates from energy/industry sampling data, nighttime satellite lights, and satellite vegetation indices should be used to enhance the quality of research in this domain [66].

5. Conclusions

This study examined the dynamics of land use in Shanghai over the past three decades, focusing on the evolution of industrial land parcels. A high-dimensional dataset representing built environment elements of IPs/ICs was constructed. Using retrospective and clustering analyses, industrial development patterns were classified into six categories. Combined with GIS-based spatial statistics and classical quantitative methods, the study quantified thermal environment responses under varying industrial intensities. This revealed the mechanisms linking industrial development and urban heat dynamics. The key findings are summarized as follows:

Socioeconomic development and land development patterns are highly interrelated across three spatial scales. At the macro scale, Shanghai’s urbanization is divided into four distinct stages. At the zonal scale, urban expansion shifts from a single-center pattern (central city outward) to a multi-center pattern (IPs/ICs toward the periphery). At the local scale, IPs/ICs were initially limited in scale but gradually became significant contributors to newly developed urban land with the progression of urbanization and industrialization. The central city, constrained by land scarcity and environmental pressures, shifted from incremental expansion to stock renewal. However, suburban areas with abundant land absorbed industrial outward migration, significantly altering LULC patterns. The findings reveal the process by which IPs/ICs reshape metropolitan land use structures.
The mechanism between industrial development patterns and thermal environment responses was emphasized, revealing a strong spatial correspondence between the urban thermal anomaly range and LULC distribution. During S1 and S2, the thermal environment exhibited a single-core aggregation pattern, primarily affecting the central city, gradually spreading outward. In the S3, under industrial suburbanization, the proportion of industrial land in the outer ring and suburbs surged. This has resulted in industrial parks becoming new urban heat sources and significantly aggravating the thermal environment. In the S4, the thermal environment exhibited a “central mitigation–peripheral deterioration” pattern. This was characterized by the central areas mitigating urban heat islands through green infrastructure, while the expansion of industrial land at the urban periphery imposed sustained thermal stress. Sequential analysis highlighted the high correspondence between Shanghai’s UHI extent and LULC distribution. It reflected a shift from single-core zonal expansion to multi-core peripheral spread. This research moves beyond merely documenting UHI to explicitly linking its spatial-temporal trajectory to the migration and intensification of industrial land, thereby providing a mechanistic explanation for the observed thermal stress patterns.
At the local scale, the majority (approximately 75%) of industrial parks rapidly transformed from low-intensity development to medium- and high-intensity patterns. A rapid expansion of new urban heat island effect zones has been seen, with a contribution to the deterioration of the city’s overall thermal environment being made as a result. In contrast, only a few peripheral industrial parks (approximately 20.31%) transitioned from low to medium intensity, without forming new urban heat island areas. This highlights the urgent need to incorporate UHI considerations into industrial land use policies. This can be achieved by controlling development intensity in surrounding industrial zones and implementing green infrastructure-based industrial estate design.
The open-source data and methodological framework employed in this study provide valuable references for the adjustment of industrial land, functional optimization, and mitigation of adverse thermal environment impacts in similar urban regions, offering practical guidance for enhancing climate change resilience.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su172210199/s1, R code for Land Surface Temperature (LST) retrieval.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-J.W. and H.Z.; methodology, W.-J.W. and H.Z.; software, W.-J.W.; validation, W.-J.W., H.Z., H.-R.Y. and Y.-H.L.; formal analysis, W.-J.W.; investigation, W.-J.W.; resources, W.-J.W. and H.Z.; data curation, W.-J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-J.W.; writing—review and editing, W.-J.W.,H.Z., and A.-L.Z.; visualization, W.-J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The commercial data is unavailable due to data protection. The other data can be provided on request.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Grammarly PREMIUM for the purposes of grammar revision and polishing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Ms. Ai-lian Zhao was employed by the company East China Electric Power Design Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

LULC	Land Use/Land Cover
UHI	Urban Heat Island
IPs	Industrial Parks
ICs	Industrial Clusters
C2L2	Collection 2 Level 2
MLC	Maximum Likelihood Supervised Classification
LSE	Land Surface Emissivity
CBEM	Classification-Based Emissivity Method
PBEM	Pv-Based Emissivity Method
BAF	Built-up Area Fraction
VC	Vegetation Cover
WAF	Water Area Fraction
PD	Population Density
RD	Road Density
CA	Core Area
EDA	Exploratory Data Analysis
HCA	Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Appendix A

Table A1. Basic information of Industrial parks/industrial clusters.

ID	Name (Abbreviation)		Ring	Industry Type	Area (ha)	Buffer (m)
IP1	Pengpu Industrial Park (Pengpu)		Middle Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	435.33	500
IP2	Taopu Industrial Park (Taopu)		Middle Ring	Life Health	402.03	1000
IP3	Caohejing Hi-Tech Industrial Park (Caohejing)		Middle Ring	Electronic Information	367.02	500
IP4	Baihe Industrial Park (Baihe)		Suburb	Fashion Consumer Goods	377.01	500
IP5	Huaxin Industrial Park (Huaxin)		Suburb	Automobile	360.99	1000
IP6	Qingpu Industrial Park (Qingpu)		Suburb	Electronic Information	4508.01	1500
IP7	Shangta Industrial Park (Shangta)		Urban Fringe	Electronic Information	76.77	500
IP8	Zhujiajiao Industrial Park (Zhujiajiao)		Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	279.63	1000
IP9	Jinze Industrial Park (Jinze)		Urban Fringe	Non-Six Major Industries	76.23	1000
IP10	Liantang Industrial Park (Liantang)		Urban Fringe	Non-Six Major Industries	292.32	500
IP11	Fengjing Industrial Park (Fengjing)		Urban Fringe	Automobile	473.22	500
IP12	Xingta Industrial Park (Xingta)		rban Fringe	Fashion Consumer Goods	486.18	1000
IP13	Tinglin Industrial Park (Tinglin)		Suburb	Electronic Information	440.1	1000
IP14	Ganxiang Industrial Park (Ganxiang)		Urban Fringe	Non-Six Major Industries	179.01	500
IP15	Jinshan Zhangyan Industrial Park (JS Zhangyan)		Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	377.55	1000
IP16	Jinshan Langxia Industrial Park (JS Langxia)		Urban Fringe	Fashion Consumer Goods	170.46	1000
IP17	Songjiang Industrial Cluster (East) (Songjiang (E))		Suburb	Electronic Information	3890.16	500
IP18	Caohejing Development Zone-Songjiang Park (Caohejing (SJ))		Outer Ring	Electronic Information	66.42	500
IP19	Zhuanghang Industrial Park (Zhuanghang)		Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	37.08	1000
IP20	Wuqiao Industrial Park (Wuqiao)		Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	99	1000
IP21	Yangwang Industrial Park (Yangwang)		Suburb	High-end Equipment	215.19	1000
IP22	Star Fire Development Zone (Star Fire)		Suburb	Life Health	746.19	500
IP23	Qinggang Industrial Park (Qinggang)		Suburb	Advanced Materials	303.75	500
IP24	Fengcheng Industrial Park (Fengcheng)		Suburb	Electronic Information	622.89	500
IP25	Jinhui Industrial Park (Jinhui)		Suburb	Life Health	323.19	1000
IP26	Touqiao Industrial Park (Touqiao)		Suburb	Electronic Information	188.37	1000
IP27	Situan Industrial Park (Situan)		Suburb	Fashion Consumer Goods	142.11	500
IP28	Lingang Free Trade Industrial Park (LG FreeTrade)		Urban Fringe	Non-Six Major Industries	113.58	500
IP29	Lingang Main Industrial Base (LG Main)		Urban Fringe	High-end Equipment	3120.84	500
IP30	Nanhui Industrial Park (Nanhui)		Suburb	High-end Equipment	819.09	500
IP31	Kangqiao Industrial Park (East) (Kangqiao)		Outer Ring	Electronic Information	1962.72	1000
IP32	Xuanqiao Industrial Park (Xuanqiao)		Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	161.19	1000
IP33	Laogang Chemical Industrial Park (Laogang)		Suburb	Electronic Information	124.38	500
IP34	Aircraft Assembly Base (Aircraft Assembly)		Suburb	High-end Equipment	221.67	500
IP35	Liuzao Industrial Park (Liuzao)		Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	45.9	500
IP36	Chuansha Economic Zone (Chuansha)		Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	294.03	500
IP37	Huating Industrial Park (Huating)		Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	116.55	500
IP38	Xuxing Industrial Park (Xuxing)		Suburb	High-end Equipment	248.67	1000
IP39	Jiading Industrial Park (North) (Jiading (N))		Suburb	Automobile	1928.7	1500
IP40	Jiading Industrial Park (South) (Jiading (S))		Outer Ring	Automobile	716.13	1000
IP41	Jiangqiao Industrial Park (Jiangqiao)		Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	206.73	1000
IP42	Chongming Industrial Park (Chongming)		Urban Fringe	Electronic Information	421.56	500
IP43	Fusheng Economic Development Zone (Fusheng)		Suburb	Electronic Information	418.68	500
IC1	Baoshan Steel-Wusong Industrial Cluster (Baoshan Steel-Wusong)	IC-1-1 Baoshan City Industrial Park (North) (Baoshan (N))	Suburb	Advanced Materials	1682.46	1000
		IC-1-2 Baoshan Steel Base (Baoshan Steel)	Outer Ring	Advanced Materials	2944.53
		IC-1-3 Luodian Industrial Park (Luodian)	Suburb	Advanced Materials	473.04
		IC-1-4 Yueyang Industrial Park (Yueyang)	Outer Ring	Advanced Materials	822.69
		IC-1-5 Gucun Industrial Park (Gucun)	Outer Ring	High-end Equipment	187.2
		IC-1-6 Wusong Industrial Base (Wusong)	Outer Ring	Advanced Materials	1694.07
IC2	Anting-Waigang Industrial Cluster (Anting-Waigang)	IC-2-1 Waigang Industrial Park (Waigang)	Suburb	Automobile	316.71	1000
		IC-2-2 Auto Parts Industrial Park (Car Configuration)	Suburb	Automobile	1114.74
		IC-2-3 Anting Auto Industry Base (Anting)	Suburb	Automobile	573.57
IC3	Huangdu-Nanxiang Industrial Cluster (Huangdu-Nanxiang)	IC-3-1 Huangdu Industrial Park (Huangdu)	Outer Ring	Automobile	456.39	1000
IC3	Huangdu-Nanxiang Industrial Cluster (Huangdu-Nanxiang)	IC-3-2 Nanxiang Industrial Park (Nanxiang)	Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	441.27	1000
IC4	Nanxiang-Baoshan City Industrial Cluster (Nanxiang-Baoshan City)	IC-4-1 Baoshan City Industrial Park (South) (Baoshan (S))	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	341.55	500
IC4		IC-4-2 Nanxiang Industrial Park (Nanxiang Town)	Outer Ring	High-end Equipment	216.72	500
IC5	Xujing-Minbei Industrial Cluster (Xujing-Minbei)	IC-5-1 Xujing Industrial Park (Xujing)	Outer Ring	Life Health	217.26	1000
IC5	Xujing-Minbei Industrial Cluster (Xujing-Minbei)	IC-5-2 Minbei Industrial Park (Mingbei)	Outer Ring	Life Health	616.77	1000
IC6	Jiuting-Sijing-Dongting Industrial Cluster (Jiuting-Sijing-Dongting)	IC-6-1 Jiuting High-Tech Industrial Park (Jiuting Hi-Tech)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	246.6	500
		IC-6-2 Sijing Industrial Park (Sijing)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	612.09
		IC-6-3 Jiuting Industrial Park (Jiuting Town)	Outer Ring	Fashion Consumer Goods	218.07
		IC-6-4 Dongjing Industrial Park (Dongting)	Suburb	High-end Equipment	542.88
IC7	Songjiang-Yongfeng-Shihudang Industrial Cluster (Songjiang-Yongfeng-Shihudang)	IC-7-1 Songjiang Industrial Zone (West) (Songjiang)	Suburb	Electronic Information	2123.73	1500
		IC-7-2 Yongfeng Industrial Park (Yongfeng)	Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	427.86
		IC-7-3 Shihudang Industrial Park (Shihudang)	Suburb	Fashion Consumer Goods	273.06
IC8	Zhujing-Songyin Industrial Cluster (Zhujing-Songyin)	IC-8-1 Zhujing Industrial Park (Zhujing)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	582.12	1000
IC8	Zhujing-Songyin Industrial Cluster (Zhujing-Songyin)	IC-8-2 Songyin Industrial Park (Songyin)	Suburb	Fashion Consumer Goods	142.65	1000
IC9	Jinshan Second Industrial Cluster (Jinshan Second)	IC-9-1 Jinshan Second Industrial Park (Jinshan NO.2)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	893.34	1500
IC9	Jinshan Second Industrial Cluster (Jinshan Second)	IC-9-2 Jinshan Petrochemical-Petrochemical Base (Jinshan Base)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	971.64	1500
IC10	Jinshan Industrial Cluster (Jinshan)	IC-10-1 Jinshan Industrial Park (Jinshan)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	1423.89	1000
IC10	Jinshan Industrial Cluster (Jinshan)	IC-10-2 Jinshan Industrial Park South District (Jinshan (S))	Urban Fringe	Life Health	595.71	1000
IC11	Fengxian Chemical Industrial Cluster (Fengxian Chemical)	IC-11-1 Lingang Industrial Park (Lingang)	Suburb	Advanced Materials	252.63	500
		IC-11-2 Chemical Industry Zone Fengxian Sub-district (Fengxian)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	1698.75
		IC-11-3 Chemical Industry—Petrochemical Base (Chemical)	Urban Fringe	Advanced Materials	1127.34
IC12	Minhang Export-Comprehensive Zone (Minhang Export-Comprehensive Zone)	IC-12-1 Taishun Industrial Park (Taishun)	Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	306.45	1000
		IC-12-2 Fengxian Modern Agricultural Park (Fengxian Agriculture)	Suburb	Fashion Consumer Goods	607.14
		IC-12-3 Minhang Export Processing Zone (Minhang Export)	Suburb	Electronic Information	1119.69
		IC-12-4 Comprehensive Industrial Development Zone (Comprehensive Zone)	Suburb	Electronic Information	650.7
IC13	Minhang-Maqiao Industrial Cluster (Minhang-Maqiao)	IC-13-1 Maqiao Industrial Park (Maqiao)	Suburb	Non-Six Major Industries	175.32	500
IC13	Minhang-Maqiao Industrial Cluster (Minhang-Maqiao)	IC-13-2 Minhang Economic and Technological Development Zone (Minhang)	Suburb	High-end Equipment	1376.01	500
IC14	Wujing-Xiangyang- Xinmei Industrial Cluster (Wujing-Xiangyang- Xinmei)	IC-14-1 Xinzhuang Industrial Park (Xinzhuang)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	1398.78	500
		IC-14-2 Xiangyang Industrial Park (Xiangyang)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	601.74
		IC-14-3 Wujing Industrial Base (Wujing)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	1142.46
		IC-14-4 Xinmei Industrial Park (Xinmei)	Outer Ring	Fashion Consumer Goods	176.31
IC15	Kangqiao-Pujiang-Aerospace Hi-Tech Industrial Cluster (Kangqiao-Pujiang-Aerospace Hi-Tech)	IC-15-1 Kangqiao Industrial Park (Kangqiao)	Middle Ring	Electronic Information	380.07	1000
		IC-15-2 Caohejing Development Zone Pujiang Park (Pujiang)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	970.11
		IC-15-3 Pujiang Industrial Park (Pujiang Town)	Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	223.38
		IC-15-4 Aerospace Technology Industrial Park (Aerospace Hi-Tech)	Outer Ring	High-end Equipment	282.51
IC16	Zhangjiang-Beicai Industrial Cluster (Zhangjiang-Beicai)	IC-16-1 Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park (Microelectronics Base) (Zhangjiang)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	494.91	1000
IC16	Zhangjiang-Beicai Industrial Cluster (Zhangjiang-Beicai)	IC-16-2 Beicai Industrial Park (Beicai)	Middle Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	368.82	1000
IC17	Heqing-Jinqiao Outskirt Industrial Cluster (Heqing-Jinqiao Outskirt)	IC-17-1 Heqing Economic Development Zone (Heqing)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	579.78	1000
IC17		IC-17-2 Jinqiao Export Processing Zone (Outer Ring) (Jinqiao Outskirt)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	660.15	1000
IC18	Gaoqiao-Jinqiao-Caolu Industrial Cluster (Gaoqiao-Jinqiao-Caolu)	IC-18-1 Gaoqiao Industrial Park (Gaoqiao)	Middle Ring	Advanced Materials	1084.41	1000
		IC-18-2 Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone (Gaoqiao FreeTrade)	Outer Ring	Non-Six Major Industries	1033.38
		IC-18-3 Caolu Industrial Park (Caolu)	Outer Ring	Electronic Information	178.65
		IC-18-4 Jinqiao Export Processing Zone (Inner Ring) (Jinqiao)	Middle Ring	Electronic Information	1465.92
IC19	Pudong Airport-Zhuqiao Industrial Cluster (Pudong Airport-Zhuqiao)	IC-19-1 Pudong Airport Industrial Park (Pudong Airport)	Suburb	High-end Equipment	625.68	1000
IC19		IC-19-2 Zhuqiao Airport Industrial Park (Zhuqiao)	Suburb	High-end Equipment	748.71	1000
IC20	Lingang-Seaport Industrial Cluster (Lingang-Seaport)	IC-20-1 Lingang Heavy Equipment Industrial Base (Lingang)	Urban Fringe	High-end Equipment	3249.18	1000
		IC-20-2 Lingang Logistics Park Fengxian Sub-district (Lingang Fenxian)	Urban Fringe	High-end Equipment	515.25
		IC-20-3 Seaport Comprehensive Development Zone Industrial Park (Seaport)	Urban Fringe	Non-Six Major Industries	657.45
IC21	Changxing Island Shipbuilding Industrial Cluster (Changxing Island Shipbuilding)	IC-21-1 Changxing Island Shipbuilding Supporting Base (Changxing Island)	Suburb	High-end Equipment	471.69	1000
		IC-21-2 Changxing Island Shipbuilding Base East Block (Changxing Island (E))	Suburb	High-end Equipment	2247.03
		IC-21-3 Changxing Island Shipbuilding Base West Block (Changxing Island (W))	Suburb	High-end Equipment	300.15

Table A2. Error matrix of land use classification from 1995 to 2022.

Year	Item	Built Up	Vegetated Land	Water	Tidal Land
1995	Built up	190	20	5	11
	Vegetated land	13	181	10	12
	Water	6	13	132	15
	Tidal land	7	20	7	43
2001	Built up	177	15	10	7
	Vegetated land	6	178	7	11
	Water	5	13	127	13
	Tidal land	6	17	11	68
2007	Built up	193	11	6	11
	Vegetated land	11	177	6	13
	Water	12	5	137	14
	Tidal land	6	17	11	50
2015	Built up	169	8	7	12
	Vegetated land	10	178	5	13
	Water	5	9	129	17
	Tidal land	11	21	5	50
2022	Built up	180	7	6
	Vegetated land	11	193	5
	Water	4	6	137
	Tidal land	11	23	12

Table A3. Accuracy indices of land use classification from 1995 to 2022.

Year	Item	Mapping Accuracy	Omission	User Accuracy	Commission
1995	Built up	84.07%	15.93%	87.96%	12.04%
	Vegetated land	83.80%	16.20%	77.35%	22.65%
	Water	79.52%	20.48%	85.71%	14.29%
	Tidal land	55.84%	44.16%	53.09%	46.91%
	Overall Accuracy	79.71%
2001	Built up	84.69%	15.31%	91.24%	8.76%
	Vegetated land	88.12%	11.88%	79.82%	20.18%
	Water	80.38%	19.62%	81.94%	18.06%
	Tidal land	66.67%	33.33%	68.69%	31.31%
	Overall Accuracy	81.97%
2007	Built up	87.33%	12.67%	86.94%	13.06%
	Vegetated land	85.51%	14.49%	84.29%	15.71%
	Water	81.55%	18.45%	85.63%	14.38%
	Tidal land	59.52%	40.48%	56.82%	43.18%
	Overall Accuracy	81.91%
2015	Built up	86.22%	13.78%	86.67%	13.33%
	Vegetated land	86.41%	13.59%	82.41%	17.59%
	Water	80.63%	19.38%	88.36%	11.64%
	Tidal land	57.47%	42.53%	54.35%	45.65%
	Overall Accuracy	81.05%
2022	Built up	89.11%	10.89%	87.38%	12.62%
	Vegetated land	86.16%	13.84%	84.28%	15.72%
	Water	83.54%	16.46%	85.63%	14.38%
	Tidal land	57.01%	42.99%	59.80%	40.20%
	Overall Accuracy	81.92%

Table A4. Error matrix of manually corrected post-classification products from 1995 to 2022.

Year	Item	Built Up	Vegetated Land	Water	Tidal Land
1995	Built up	193	9	3	11
	Vegetated land	5	181	5	12
	Water	2	5	137	15
	Tidal land	2	5	2	43
2001	Built up	173	5	3	7
	Vegetated land	2	138	2	11
	Water	2	5	127	13
	Tidal land	2	5	2	68
2007	Built up	239	3	2	11
	Vegetated land	5	243	2	13
	Water	2	5	186	14
	Tidal land	2	3	3	50
2015	Built up	181	2	3	12
	Vegetated land	3	167	3	13
	Water	4	5	135	17
	Tidal land	2	5	6	50
2022	Built up	172	6	2
	Vegetated land	3	158	2
	Water	3	8	137
	Tidal land	2	2	3

Table A5. Accuracy indices of manually corrected post-classification products from 1995 to 2022.

Year	Item	Mapping Accuracy	Omission	User Accuracy	Commission
1995	Built up	93.69%	6.31%	95.54%	4.46%
	Vegetated land	90.95%	9.05%	90.50%	9.50%
	Water	93.20%	6.80%	93.20%	6.80%
	Tidal land	88.31%	11.69%	91.89%	8.11%
	Overall Accuracy	92.05%
2001	Built up	94.54%	5.46%	96.65%	3.35%
	Vegetated land	93.88%	6.12%	90.20%	9.80%
	Water	91.37%	8.63%	94.78%	5.22%
	Tidal land	86.96%	13.04%	83.33%	16.67%
	Overall Accuracy	92.57%
2007	Built up	97.55%	2.45%	96.37%	3.63%
	Vegetated land	96.05%	3.95%	95.67%	4.33%
	Water	94.90%	5.10%	96.37%	3.63%
	Tidal land	89.19%	10.81%	90.41%	9.59%
	Overall Accuracy	95.57%
2015	Built up	95.26%	4.74%	95.26%	4.74%
	Vegetated land	95.43%	4.57%	93.30%	6.70%
	Water	90.60%	9.40%	91.84%	8.16%
	Tidal land	77.59%	22.41%	80.36%	19.64%
	Overall Accuracy	92.31%
2022	Built up	94.51%	5.49%	95.56%	4.44%
	Vegetated land	94.61%	5.39%	90.80%	9.20%
	Water	88.96%	11.04%	95.14%	4.86%
	Tidal land	88.71%	11.29%	82.09%	17.91%
	Overall Accuracy	92.39%

Figure A1. Correlation of LST_PBEM with LST_CBEM and LST_PBEM with LST_C2 in Shanghai for five years.

Figure A2. Dendrogram of the complete linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 1995. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A3. Dendrogram of the average linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 1995. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A4. Dendrogram of the centroid linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 1995. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A5. Dendrogram of the complete linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2001. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A6. Dendrogram of the average linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2001. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A7. Dendrogram of the centroid linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2001. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A8. Dendrogram of the complete linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2007. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A9. Dendrogram of the average linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2007. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A10. Dendrogram of the centroid linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2007. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A11. Dendrogram of the complete linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2015. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A12. Dendrogram of the average linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2015. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A13. Dendrogram of the centroid linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2015. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A14. Dendrogram of the complete linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2022. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A15. Dendrogram of the average linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2022. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

Figure A16. Dendrogram of the centroid linkage clustering methods for IPs/ICs in 2022. Note: The red line represents the classification threshold.

References

UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities 2022; UN-Habitat: Nairobi, Kenya, 2022; p. 2022, 19. [Google Scholar]
Oke, T.R. Canyon geometry and the nocturnal urban heat-island-comparison of scale model and field observations. J. Climatol. 1981, 1, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wu, X.; Wang, L.; Yao, R.; Luo, M.; Wang, S.; Wang, L. Quantitatively evaluating the effect of urbanization on heat waves in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 731, 138857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhou, D.; Xiao, J.; Bonafoni, S.; Berger, C.; Deilami, K.; Zhou, Y.; Frolking, S.; Yao, R.; Qiao, Z.; Sobrino, J.A. Satellite remote sensing of surface urban heat islands: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mohajerani, A.; Bakaric, J.; Jeffrey-Bailey, T. The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 197, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Oke, T.R. City size and the urban heat island. Atmos. Environ. 1973, 7, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Burke, M.; Gonzalez, F.; Bayliss, P.; Heft-Neal, S.; Baysan, C.; Basu, S.; Hsiang, S. Higher temperatures increase suicide rates in the United States and Mexico. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lin, L.; Gao, T.; Luo, M.; Ge, E.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Ning, G. Contribution of urbanization to the changes in extreme climate events in urban agglomerations across China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhai, J.; Tao, H.; Jiang, T.; Su, B.; Yang, J.; Wang, G.; Liu, Q.; Gao, C.; et al. Tens of thousands additional deaths annually in cities of China between 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C warming. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Balling, R.C.; Vose, R.S.; Weber, G.R. Analysis of long-term European temperature records: 1751–1995. Clim. Res. 1998, 10, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
McCarthy, M.P.; Best, M.J.; Betts, R.A. Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37, L09705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pyrgou, A.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Santamouris, M. Urban-rural moisture contrast: Regulator of the urban heat island and heatwaves’ synergy over a mediterranean city. Environ. Res. 2020, 182, 109102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Santamouris, M. Cooling the cities—A review of reflective and green roof mitigation technologies to fight heat island and improve comfort in urban environments. Sol. Energy 2014, 103, 682–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, Y.; Berardi, U.; Akbari, H. Comparing the effects of urban heat island mitigation strategies for Toronto, Canada. Energ. Build. 2016, 114, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhao, R.; Fang, C.; Liu, H.; Liu, X. Evaluating urban ecosystem resilience using the DPSIR framework and the ENA model: A case study of 35 cities in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 72, 102997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gao, J.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, L.; Hu, D. How does the ambient environment respond to the industrial heat island effects? An innovative and comprehensive methodological paradigm for quantifying the varied cooling effects of different landscapes. Gisci. Remote Sens. 2022, 59, 1643–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xie, M.; Wang, Y.; Chang, Q.; Fu, M.; Ye, M. Assessment of landscape patterns affecting land surface temperature in different biophysical gradients in Shenzhen, China. Urban Ecosyst. 2013, 16, 871–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, X.; Yue, W.; Yang, X.; Hu, K.; Zhang, W.; Huang, M. Mapping Urban Heat Vulnerability of Extreme Heat in Hangzhou via Comparing Two Approaches. Complexity 2020, 2020, 9717658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sabrin, S.; Karimi, M.; Nazari, R. Developing Vulnerability Index to Quantify Urban Heat Islands Effects Coupled with Air Pollution: A Case Study of Camden, NJ. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Meng, Q.; Hu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z. Do industrial parks generate intra-heat island effects in cities? New evidence, quantitative methods, and contributing factors from a spatiotemporal analysis of top steel plants in China. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jiang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. Exploring the Industrial Heat Island Effects and Key Influencing Factors in the Guangzhou–Foshan Metropolitan Area. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chakrabortty, R.; Pramanik, M.; Hasan, M.M.; Halder, B.; Pande, C.B.; Moharir, K.N.; Zhran, M. Mitigating Urban Heat Islands in the Global South: Data-driven Approach for Effective Cooling Strategies. Earth Syst. Environ. 2025, 9, 447–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Al Shawabkeh, R.; Al-Hawwari, L.; Al-Fugara, A.; Saleem, K.; Smerat, A.; Abualigah, L. Analyzing urban landscapes and land surface temperature for sustainable development in industrial zones. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 12245–12268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X. Simulating and mitigating extreme urban heat island effects in a factory area based on machine learning. Build. Environ. 2021, 202, 108051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mao, C.; Xie, M.; Fu, M. Thermal response to patch characteristics and configurations of industrial and mining land in a Chinese mining city. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 112, 106075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sailor, D.J. A review of methods for estimating anthropogenic heat and moisture emissions in the urban environment. Int. J. Climatol. 2011, 31, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhang, H.; Qi, Z.; Ye, X.; Cai, Y.; Ma, W.; Chen, M. Analysis of land use/land cover change, population shift, and their effects on spatiotemporal patterns of urban heat islands in metropolitan Shanghai, China. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 44, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chen, L.; Jiang, R.; Xiang, W. Surface Heat Island in Shanghai and Its Relationship with Urban Development from 1989 to 2013. Adv. Meteorol. 2016, 2016, 9782686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Kainz, W. Monitoring patterns of urban heat islands of the fast-growing Shanghai metropolis, China: Using time-series of Landsat TM/ETM+ data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2012, 19, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, W.; Zhang, H. Remote sensing evaluation of urban heat island and its spatial pattern of the shanghai metropolitan area, china. Ecol. Complex. 2009, 6, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, C.; Shen, D.; Dong, J.; Yin, J.; Zhao, J.; Xue, D. Monitoring of urban heat island in Shanghai, China, from 1981 to 2010 with satellite data. Arab. J. Geosci. 2014, 7, 3961–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, W.; Shu, J. Urban Renewal Can Mitigate Urban Heat Islands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e2019GL085948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
You, M.; Guan, C. Does self-containment of spatial scale and land use function contribute to mitigate urban heat island effects? Lessons from new towns in Shanghai. Land Use Policy 2024, 146, 107323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhang, K.; Wang, R.; Shen, C.; Da, L. Temporal and spatial characteristics of the urban heat island during rapid urbanization in Shanghai, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 169, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bureau, S.S. Shanghai Overview_Shanghai Statistics Bureau. Available online: https://tjj.sh.gov.cn/shgl/index.html (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Bureau, S.S. 2024 Shanghai Overview. Available online: https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/shanghai/newshanghai/shgl2024.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Bureau, S.S. Shanghai Statistical Classification of Six Key Industries (Version 2022)_Local Statistical Classification_Shanghai Statistics Bureau. Available online: https://tjj.sh.gov.cn/dfbz/20230201/ff1234799ae2438aab2f2925e968dd1e.html (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Sayler, K.; Zanter, K. Landsat 8-9 Level 2 Science Product (L2SP) Guide. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/landsat-8-9-collection-2-level-2-science-product-guide (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Sayler, K.; Zanter, K. Landsat 4-7 Level 2 Science Product (L2SP) Guide September 2021. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/media/files/landsat-4-7-collection-2-level-2-science-product-guide (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Earth Resources Data Cloud. Available online: http://gis5g.com (accessed on 6 March 2025).
Pengcheng Laboratory for Remote Sensing and Astronomy. Available online: https://data-starcloud.pcl.ac.cn/ (accessed on 30 November 2024).
Wang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Huang, J. Remote Sensing of the Environment; Science Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Pontius, R.G.; Millones, M. Death to Kappa: Birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 4407–4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Becker, F. The impact of spectral emissivity on the measurement of land surface temperature from a satellite. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1987, 8, 1509–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Snyder, W.C.; Wan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.Z. Classification-based emissivity for land surface temperature measurement from space. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 2753–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sun, D.L.; Pinker, R.T. Estimation of land surface temperature from a Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES-8). J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2003, 108, 4326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Valor, E.; Caselles, V. Mapping land surface emissivity from NDVI: Application to European, African, and South American areas. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 57, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Van De Griend, A.A.; Owe, M. On the relationship between thermal emissivity and the normalized difference vegetation index for natural surfaces. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1993, 14, 1119–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gao, F.; Morisette, J.T.; Wolfe, R.E.; Ederer, G.; Pedelty, J.; Masuoka, E.; Myneni, R.; Tan, B.; Nightingale, J. An algorithm to produce temporally and spatially continuous modis-lai time series. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008, 5, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jiang, Z.; Huete, A.R.; Didan, K.; Miura, T. Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 3833–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Qin, Z.; Liu, W.; Xu, B.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J. Estimation of surface specific emissivity in the Landsat TM6 band range. Remote Sens. Land Resour. 2004, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, R.; Yan, W. The 50-year spatial transition of suburban industrial parks and impacts on sustainable urbanization in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 113, 105679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Modak, S. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. J. Appl. Stat. 2024, 51, 1618–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2025. [Google Scholar]
Seto, K.C.; Fragkias, M.; Gueneralp, B.; Reilly, M.K. A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, X. Investigation of a coupling model of coordination between urbanization and the environment. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 98, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jiao, L.; Gong, C.; Xu, G.; Dong, T.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z. Urban expansion dynamics and urban forms in three metropolitan areas—Tokyo, New York, and Shanghai. Prog. Geogr. 2019, 38, 675–685. [Google Scholar]
Kang, L.; Ma, L. Expansion of Industrial Parks in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration: A Spatial Analysis. Land 2021, 10, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
An, X.; Jin, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M. Analysis of long-term wetland variations in China using land use/land cover dataset derived from Landsat images. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 145, 109689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lin, B.; Li, Z. Spatial analysis of mainland cities’ carbon emissions of and around Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wang, W.; Liu, K.; Tang, R.; Wang, S. Remote sensing image-based analysis of the urban heat island effect in Shenzhen, China. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2019, 110, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ivanova Boncheva, A. Innovative Adaptation to Climate Change: Chinese Sponge Cities Program (SCP). Curr. Urban Stud. 2022, 10, 188–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dong, X.; Ye, Y.; Yang, R.; Li, X. Planning for green infrastructure based on integration of multi-driving factors: A case study in pilot site of sponge city. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 93, 104549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wei, L.; Sobrino, J.A. Surface urban heat island analysis based on local climate zones using ECOSTRESS and Landsat data: A case study of Valencia city (Spain). Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2024, 130, 103875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Yu, Z.; Yu, R.; Ge, X.; Fu, J.; Hu, Y.; Chen, S. Tabular prior-data fitted network for urban air temperature inference and high temperature risk assessment. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 128, 106484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Qian, W.; Rao, F.; Li, X.; Lai, D. Mapping priority zones for urban heat mitigation in Shanghai: Heat risk vs. shelter provision. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2025, 121, 102330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Location of the study area showing the industrial parks (IPs) and industrial clusters (ICs), and their buffer zones. Note: In this figure, buffer zones vary with the distance from 500 m, 1000 m, to 1500 m, depending on the scale of the IP/IC core area and their influencing range on adjacent land development.

Figure 2. Land use dynamics in Shanghai across the study period.

Figure 3. Changes in Developed Land areas across different urban rings during 1995–2022. (a) Middle Ring; (b) Outer Ring; (c) Suburban Area; (d) Exurban area. (n = 64).

Figure 4. Overall patterns of annual LULC and LSTs in the study area. Note: (a–e) showing LULC maps from 1995 to 2022; (f–j) showing annual daytime LST maps of from 1995 to 2022.

Figure 5. Temporal Coupling of development patterns of IPs/ICs and LST in Shanghai (1995–2022). (a–e) Spatiotemporal evolution of development types; (f–j) Corresponding mean summer LST patterns.

Table 1. Description of data sets used for this study.

Data	Time	Description
Landsat-5 TM C2L2	12 August 1995 28 July 2007	Path/row: 118/38 and 118/39. All spectral bands, except for the panchromatic band, have a spatial resolution of 30 m. The Landsat series images maintain consistent sensor design features over an extended period. They are provided as Collection 2 (C2) Level 2 Science Products (L2SP). In these datasets, the complex processes involved in surface reflectance, brightness temperature, emissivity, and land surface data have been systematically addressed using rigorous correction methods, along with accompanying quality assessment reports. For detailed information on image parameters, radiometric correction, atmospheric correction, and ground control point (GCP)-based terrain correction, please refer to the relevant data product manuals [38,39]. In this study, we obtained all summertime satellite images with optimal visual quality (cloud cover less than 5%) over a five-year period from the Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.gscloud.cn) [40]. Additionally, our visual inspection of the Landsat series images excluded striping patterns present in the scenes.
Landsat-7 ETM + C2L2	3 July 2001
Landsat-8/9 OLI/TIRS C2L2	3 August 2015 14 August 2022
LULC	1995/2001/2007/ 2015/2022	LULC datasets were derived using a supervised classification method.
Commercial urban geographic information thematic layer	2015/2020	These layers include specific land use/land cover types, such as buildings, warehouses, industrial parks, transportation networks, vegetation, and water bodies (Beijing Digital Spatial Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China, 2015, www.gis5g.com) [40].
Open-access land use classification data products	Irregularly updated	Data were obtained from https://data-starcloud.pcl.ac.cn/ [41].
Sentinel-2 satellite imagery	2015/2022	High-resolution imagery data with 10-m resolution were used to refine land use classifications.
GF-1WFV Satellite imagery	Irregularly updated	Its Level 1A imagery with 16-m resolution was used to refine land use classifications.
OpenStreetMap urban geographic layers	Irregularly updated	Used to refine land use classifications.
Tianditu/Google historical imagery/91weitu	1995/2001/2007/ 2015/2022	These open-access platforms were used to obtain historical imagery of industrial parks.
104 blocks boundary vector maps	−	Digitized polygons of the IP/ICs were manually drawn using 91weitu(19.4.0) software based on official reports.
China provincial boundary map	−	Data were obtained from the Earth Resources Data Cloud platform (www.gis5g.com) [40].

Table 2. Description of the classification scheme used in this study.

Land Use Type	Description
Developed land	Buildings, hardtop pavements, factories, warehouses, and transportation facilities, etc.
Vegetated land	Forest land, grassland, paddy land, dry land, gardens, and vineyards, etc.
Water	Rivers, lakes, reservoirs, ponds, and ditches, etc.
Tidal land	Intertidal zones and periodically inundated areas along the coasts and around rivers and lakes

Table 3. Vegetation cover (P_V)-based LSE (ε) estimation results.

Surface Categories	ε	P_V (12 August 1995–14 August 2022)
Water bodies	0.9925	≤0.15
Natural surfaces	0.9625 + 0.0614P_v − 0.0461P_v²	≥0.45
Urban areas	0.9589 + 0.086P_v − 0.0671P_v²	0.15–0.45

Note: In this table, both ε and P_V are unitless.

Table 4. Summary of Thermal Environment Driver Indicators in the Study Area.

Name	Formula	Description
Built-up Area Fraction (BAF)	$B A F = \frac{A_{B A}}{A}$	BAF refers to the proportion of built-up areas (%) within the study region, including building rooftops, warehouses, roads, and other impervious surfaces.
Vegetation Cover (VC)	$V C = \frac{A_{V}}{A}$	VC refers to the proportion of areas covered by various types of vegetation (%) within the study region.
Water Area Fraction (WAF)	$W A F = \frac{A_{w}}{A}$	WAF refers to the proportion of water bodies (%), such as rivers and lakes, within the study region.
Population Density (PD)	$P D = \frac{P_{i} \times A_{I S}}{A}$	PD refers to the number of people residing per unit area. It is initially calculated by persons within a 30-m pixel and subsequently converted to persons per km².
Road Density (RD)	$R D = \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} L}{A}$	RD refers to the ratio of the total length (m/km²⁾ of roads to the area of the study region.
Distance	−	Using the city center as the origin, Shanghai was divided into five concentric urban: inner ring/urban core (within 6 km from the city center), middle ring (6–15 km), outer ring (15–25 km), suburban area (25–45 km), and exurban area (45–75 km).
Core Area (CA)	−	CA refers to the area of the core zone of an industrial park.
Industrial Type	−	IPs/ICs are categorized into six key industries and others. The six key industries include Electronics and Information, Life and Health, Automotive, High-end Equipment, Advanced Materials, and Fashion Consumer Goods.

Table 5. Objective Cluster Validity Metrics for IP/IC Typology (1995–2022).

Year	Cluster Number (k)	Silhouette Coefficient	Gap Statistic
1995	6	0.63	0.78
2001	6	0.68	0.82
2007	6	0.70	0.85
2015	6	0.72	0.87
2022	6	0.69	0.89

Table 6. Summary of manual override for the HCA categories (1995–2022).

Year	Number of Adjusted IP/ICs	% of Total IP/ICs	Primary Rationale for Adjustments
1995	2	3.1	Resolved mismatches between BAF and cluster LULC (e.g., IP-7: low-density cluster with high built-up area).
2001	3	4.7	Corrected sector misalignment (e.g., IC-5-2: life health IP clustered with non-strategic industries).
2007	3	4.7	Addressed RD outliers (e.g., IC-6-4: high BAF/LST but low RD, misassigned to Type IV).
2015	2	3.1	Fixed LST inconsistencies (e.g., IP-31: medium-density cluster with high LST, aligned to Type II).
2022	1	1.6	Resolved post-classification LULC errors (e.g., IC-19-2: tidal land misclassification skewed VC, corrected to Type III).

Table 7. Characteristics of the Four Urbanization Development Stages in Shanghai.

Stage	Name	Description
S1 (1995–2001)	Slow Urbanization Period	High conversion of other land use types to built-up areas occurred mainly in the near-suburban zones, whereas the exurban areas were dominated by increases in vegetation cover and expansion of tidal flats.
S2 (2001–2007)	Rapid Urbanization Period	The inflow of built-up areas increased in the Outer Ring and suburban zones, with scattered conversions in the outer suburbs and continued expansion of tidal flats.
S3 (2007–2015)	Explosive Urbanization Period	Built-up area inflows were primarily concentrated in the suburban zones, followed by the outer suburbs, with tidal flats in the remote suburbs continuing to expand.
S4 (2015–2022)	Decelerated Urbanization Period	Due to ecological red line restrictions, conversions from other land use types to built-up areas decreased significantly within the suburban zones, while built-up area inflows increased in the outer suburbs.

Table 8. Dynamics of developed land within the middle ring, outer ring, suburb, and exurban areas in 1995–2022.

Object	Year	Area (ha)/Percentage	Spatial Extent
			Middle Ring	Outer Ring	Suburban Area	Exurban Area
IPs/ICs	1995	Area	7647.39	5032.35	4050.72	1643.67
	1995	Percentage	40.07%	11.47%	4.39%	4.63%
	2001	Area	7749.27	6970.23	4900.23	1224.27
	2001	Percentage	40.63%	15.89%	5.32%	3.45%
	2007	Area	9256.77	12,575.07	10,304.46	2733.57
	2007	Percentage	48.54%	28.67%	11.18%	7.70%
	2015	Area	13,064.94	26,144.73	32,545.71	7193.7
	2015	Percentage	68.48%	59.58%	35.30%	20.26%
	2022	Area	11,459.79	23,041.26	33,337.98	10,596.69
	2022	Percentage	60.06%	52.51%	36.15%	29.85%
Citywide	1995	Area	30,601.98	13,098.33	11,609.82	6874.11
	1995	Percentage	51.55%	10.43%	2.96%	1.30%
	2001	Area	30,312.54	18,310.95	12,567.87	3350.97
	2001	Percentage	51.08%	14.58%	3.21%	0.64%
	2007	Area	34,743.24	32,267.07	32,782.95	13,035.78
	2007	Percentage	58.56%	25.70%	8.37%	2.47%
	2015	Area	43,964.55	67,179.15	100,956.6	36,875.16
	2015	Percentage	74.07%	53.48%	25.75%	7.00%
	2022	Area	38,309.31	61,133.85	108,029.61	49,220.91
	2022	Percentage	64.54%	48.66%	27.56%	9.34%

Table 9. Categorization and characteristics of IP/IC development patterns.

Category	Indicator	Description
I	Very high land use intensity (BAF: 65.14–90.20%), poor ecological structure (VC: 9.61–30.83%), high population density (PD: 13.24–24.01 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 14,709–26,675 persons/km²), high road density (RD: 11.30–17.35 km/km²)	These industrial parks are almost entirely covered by industrial and associated facilities. Highly concentrated industrial activities lead to extremely high population and traffic volumes, while natural vegetation and water bodies remain minimal, resulting in severe ecological imbalance.
II	High land use intensity (BAF: 51.31–64.57%), moderate ecological structure (VC: 29.96–48.73%), moderate population density (PD: 2.11–5.60 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 2344–6221 persons/km²), moderate road density (RD: 4.45–9.64 km/km²)	Although the land use intensity is relatively high, a certain proportion of green space and vegetation is retained, forming a relatively balanced development pattern. Population and traffic volumes are moderate, sufficient to meet industrial development needs while also considering ecological protection.
III	Moderate land use intensity (BAF: 21.7–49.6%), poor ecological structure (VC: 30.9–68.2%), medium population density (PD: 0.96–3.76 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 1066–4177 persons/km²), high road density (RD: 2.56–8.98 km/km²)	Due to high population concentration and heavy traffic, these areas experience significant resource competition and environmental pressure. The lack of sufficient natural vegetation results in poor ecological conditions. They typically host small- to medium-sized industrial enterprises that require substantial labor input.
IV	Moderate land use intensity (BAF: 19.7–46.9%), moderate ecological structure (VC: 43.4–78.3%), medium population density (PD: 0.75–3.71 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 833–4122 persons/km²), medium road density (RD: 2.55–6.22 km/km²)	These industrial parks exhibit moderate land use and population density with a fair amount of natural vegetation, supporting a relatively balanced development. They primarily host industries compatible with sustainable growth, balancing economic activity and environmental protection.
V	Low land use intensity (BAF: 8.48–20.23%), moderate ecological structure (VC: 50.21–98.59%), medium population density (PD: 1.23–5.66 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 1366–6288 persons/km²), low road density (RD: 1.76–4.76 km/km²)	These industrial parks have low land occupation with a considerable proportion of natural vegetation, resulting in relatively favorable ecological conditions. They mainly host medium-sized industrial projects, providing a relatively relaxed development environment.
VI	Low land use intensity (BAF: 0–9.44%), good ecological structure (VC: 54.62–100%), low population density (PD: 0–1.46 per 30-m pixel, equivalently 0–1622 persons/km²), low road density (RD: 0–3.15 km/km²)	These industrial parks are at an early development stage, with land mainly consisting of non-prime farmland and other ecologically protected areas. High vegetation cover, small-scale industrial projects, low population, and very limited infrastructure characterize these areas.

Table 10. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between five built environment factors and mean LSTs across the study period.

	IC	VC	WC	PD	RD	LST
IC	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]
VC	−0.810 ** [−0.940, 0.670]	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]
WC	0.05 [−0.04, 0.24]	−0.38 ** [−0.63, −0.20]	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]
PD	0.912 ** [0.860, 0.960]	−0.772 ** [−0.85, −0.71]	0.074 [−0.140, 0.330]	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]
RD	0.624 ** [0.430, 0.760]	−0.422 ** [−0.61, 0.17]	−0.252 * [−0.34, −0.20]	0.544 ** [0.37, 0.65]	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]
LST	0.692 ** [0.500, 0.810]	−0.448 ** [−0.660, 0.250]	−0.218 [−0.310, −0.220]	0.582 ** [0.460, 0.730]	0.604 ** [0.39, 0.820]	1.000 ** [1.000, 1.000]

Note: In this table, the italic numbers denote mean correlation coefficients, the numbers in the square brackets are the minimum and maximum correlation coefficients, respectively. * and ** denote significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.

Table 11. Results of Kruskal–Wallis (K-W) test and Dunn test for LSTs (℃) among IP/IC categories.

Year	Category	N	Median	IQR	K-W Test Statistics	Multiple Comparison by Dunn Test
1995	I	3	42.2	1.45	x² = 8.665, df = 2, p = 8.848 × 10⁻⁵	Between	z.value	p.raw	p.BH
	V	18	37.3	1.82		I–V	1.742	0.041	0.041
	VI	43	36.0	0.731		I–VI	3.322	0.000	0.001
						V–VI	3.197	0.001	0.001
2001	I	3	44.9	1.02	x² = 18.955, df = 2, p = 7.656 × 10⁻⁵	I–V	1.727	0.042	0.042
	V	18	39.3	2.65		I–VI	3.328	0.000	0.001
	VI	43	37.5	1.38		V–VI	3.242	0.001	0.001
2007	I	3	46.2	0.662	x² = 22.977, df = 2, p = 1.025 × 10⁻⁵	I–IV	1.219	0.111	0.111
	IV	13	42.9	0.799		I–V	3.315	0.000	0.001
	V	48	40.2	1.93		IV–V	3.812	0.000	0.000
2015	I	16	45.6	1.18	x² = 41.514, df = 3, p = 5.088 × 10⁻⁹	I–II	2.175	0.015	0.018
	II	10	43.9	1.81		I–III	5.460	0.000	0.000
	III	25	41.3	2.06		II–III	2.328	0.010	0.015
	IV	13	40.7	3.10		I–IV	5.567	0.000	0.000
						II–IV	2.857	0.002	0.004
						III–IV	0.967	0.167	0.167
2022	I	21	50.3	2.85	x² = 7.251, df = 2, p = 0.027	I–II	0.886	0.188	0.188
	II	13	49.5	3.44		I–III	2.659	0.004	0.012
	III	30	48.7	4.67		II–III	1.336	0.091	0.136

Note: In this table, IQR denotes inter-quantile range; p.raw denotes K-W test statistics without adjustment, and p.BH denotes K-W test statistics with adjustment, respectively.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, W.-J.; Li, Y.-H.; Yang, H.-R.; Zhao, A.-L.; Zhang, H. Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210199

AMA Style

Wu W-J, Li Y-H, Yang H-R, Zhao A-L, Zhang H. Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai. Sustainability. 2025; 17(22):10199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Wen-Jia, Yan-He Li, Hao-Rong Yang, Ai-Lian Zhao, and Hao Zhang. 2025. "Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai" Sustainability 17, no. 22: 10199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210199

APA Style

Wu, W.-J., Li, Y.-H., Yang, H.-R., Zhao, A.-L., & Zhang, H. (2025). Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai. Sustainability, 17(22), 10199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Menu

Three-Decadal Analysis of Industrial Heat Island Effect Triggered by Industrial Blocks Development in Greater Shanghai

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

2.1.1. Basic Information

2.1.2. Spatial Aggregation Rules and Buffers

2.2. Data Sources

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Data Processing

2.3.2. Land Use/Land Cover Classification

2.3.3. Generation of Quality-Enhanced LST

2.3.4. Construction of an Indicator System for Thermal Environment Drivers

2.3.5. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Land Use Pattern Changes

3.2. Overall Patterns of Land Use/Land Cover Change and LST

3.3. Analysis of the Relationship Between IPs/ICs Development Patterns and LST

4. Discussion

4.1. Impact of Industrial Suburbanization on LULC and UHI

4.2. IPs/ICs Development Patterns and Industrial UHIs

4.3. Implications for Mitigating Industrial UHI Effects

4.4. Limitations and Remarks

5. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed Consent Statement

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

Abbreviations

Appendix A

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI