Avoiding Greenwashing Through the Application of Effective Green Marketing: The Case of Hospitality Industry in Lima City—Peru
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Green Marketing Strategies
2.2. Brand Image
2.3. Greenwashing
2.4. Brand Loyalty
2.5. Hospitality Industry in Peru
2.6. Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Setting and Data Collection
3.2. Survey Design
3.3. Analysis Plan
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Practical Implications
6.2. Theoretical Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Assaker, G.; O’Connor, P.; El-Haddad, R. Examining an integrated model of green image, perceived quality, satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in upscale hotels. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 934–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Expedia Group Media Solutions. Sustainable Travel-Consumer Attitudes, Values, and Motivations in Making Conscientious Choices. 2022. Available online: https://go2.advertising.expedia.com/rs/185-EIA-216/images/April_2022-Sustainable-Travel-Study-PDF-No-URL.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2024).
- Nasution, M.A.; Tawil, M.R.; Kushariyadi, K.; Gumerung, J.W.L.; Lumentah, L. The Influence of Green Marketing Strategy on Purchasing Decisions with Emotional Desire as a Moderating Variable. Int. J. Econ. Lit. 2024, 2, 386–394. [Google Scholar]
- Rahman, S.U.; Nguyen-Viet, B. Towards sustainable development: Coupling green marketing strategies and consumer perceptions in addressing greenwashing. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 2420–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijewardena, B.A.G.S.N.; Herat, U.L. The Impact of Green Marketing Components on Corporate Image of Green Certified Hotels in Sri Lanka. Wayamba J. Manag. 2020, 11, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mercade Mele, P.; Molina Gomez, J.; Garay, L. To green or not to green: The influence of green marketing on consumer behaviour in the hotel industry. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoica, M. Green Marketing Communication Strategies: An Integrative Literature Review. Ann. Univ. Oradea. Econ. Sci. 2021, 30, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerreiro, J.; Pacheco, M. How green trust, consumer brand engagement and green Word-of-Mouth mediate purchasing intentions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo. Perú: Oferta y Demanda de Establecimientos de Hospedaje, 2022. 2023. Available online: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mincetur/informes-publicaciones/4389516-informe-peru-oferta-y-demanda-de-establecimientos-de-hospedaje-ano-2022 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
- Coq-Huelva, D.; Asián-Chaves, R. Urban Sprawl and Sustainable Urban Policies. A Review of the Cases of Lima, Mexico City and Santiago de Chile. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Echeverría-Su, M.; Huamanraime-Maquin, E.; Cabrera, F.I.; Vázquez-Rowe, I. Transitioning to sustainable mobility in Lima, Peru. Are e-scooter sharing initiatives part of the problem or the solution? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 866, 161130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vizcardo, R. El valor estratégico del Hub Perú en América del Sur. Rev. Del Inst. Español De Estud. Estratégicos 2023, 22, 95–129. [Google Scholar]
- Lenzen, M.; Sun, Y.; Faturay, F.; Ting, Y.; Geschke, A.; Malik, A. The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staszewska, P.P. El Impacto de APEC en el desarrollo de la infraestructura en Perú. Política Int. 2024, 136, 160–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmiento-Guede, J.; Antonovica, A.; Antolín-Prieto, R. The Green Image in the Spanish Hotel Sector: Analysis of Its Consequences from a Relational Perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, S.; Khwaja, M.G.; Rashid, Y.; Turi, J.A.; Waheed, T. Green Brand Benefits and Brand Outcomes: The Mediating of Role Green Brand Image. Sage Open 2020, 10, 2158244020953156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, J.N.; Parvatiyar, A. Sustainable Marketing: Market-Driving, Not Market-Driven. J. Macromarketing 2020, 41, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, T.O. Impact of green marketing mix on purchase intention. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukonza, C.; Swarts, I. The influence of green marketing strategies on business performance and corporate image in the retail sector. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 29, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, K.P.; Chandu, V.; Srilakshmi, S.; Thagaram, E.; Sahyaja, C.; Osei, B. Consumers perception on green marketing towards eco-friendly fast moving consumer goods. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2023, 15, 18479790231170962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alyahia, M.; Azazz, A.M.S.; Fayyad, S.; Elshaer, I.A.; Mohammad, A.A.A. Greenwashing Behavior in Hotels Industry: The Role of Green Transparency and Green Authenticity. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadanyiova, M.; Gajanova, L.; Majerova, J. Green marketing as a part of the socially responsible brand’s communication from the aspect of generational stratification. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Chang, K.; Cheng, Y.; Hsiao, C. How Green Marketing Influences Customers’ Green Behavioral Intentions in the Context of Hot-Spring Hotels. J. Tour. Serv. 2022, 13, 190–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.; Shoenberger, H.; Kwon, E.; Ratneshwar, S. A narrative approach for overcoming the message credibility problem in green advertising. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 147, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, S.; Baloglu, S.; Topcuoglu, E. The Influence of Green Message Types on Advertising Effectiveness for Luxury and Budget Hotel Segments. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2019, 61, 443–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, J.; Kim, C.-S.; Kim, B.-S.; Park, S. Customers’ Behavioral Intentions in Relation to Sustainable Green Marketing Activities in Hotels. SAGE Open 2024, 14, 21582440241247655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farida, S.N.; Azizah, N. Brand Image Laverage in Gaining Sustainability Marketing: Brand Experience as the moder ator (Study on the “State Defense” brand in the National Development University (UPN) “Veteran” East Java). J. Econ. Financ. Manag. Stud. 2020, 3, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. Observing Consumer Market Changes from Brand Slogan Changes. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Culture, Design and Social Development (CDSD 2021), Harbin, China, 17–19 December 2021; Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wibowo, A.; Santoso, J.T. Bottled Water Purchase Decisions: A Study of Brand Image as a Green Marketing Medium in Purchase Decisions. Int. J. Supply Oper. Manag. 2024, 11, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lita, Q.D.; Hidayah, A.; Innayah, M.N.; Aryoko, Y.P. The influence of green marketing, brand image, and product quality on purchasing decisions for the Body Shop in Purwokerto. Enrich. J. Manag. 2024, 13, 3670–3678. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Han, Y.; Cho, J.H. Optimizing brand loyalty through user-centric product package design: A study of user experience in dairy industry. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, A.H.; Adnan, M.; Saeed, Z. The Impact of brand image on customer satisfaction and brand Loyalty: A Systematic literature review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e36254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lada, S. Brand image benefit and satisfaction: Roles of symbolic, functional, social, and experiential benefits. Labu. E-J. Muamalat Soc. (LJMS) 2018, 12, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szabo, S.; Webster, J. Perceived Greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 171, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-García, O.; Sureda-Negre, J. Greenwashing and education: An evidence-based approach. J. Environ. Educ. 2023, 54, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavazos, R.L.; Taylor, K.; Eary, R.B.; Doty, S. Institutional and Individual Effects of Greenwashing on Food Waste. Sustainability 2023, 15, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, M.; Bharti, U. Combating Greenwashing Tactics and Embracing the Economic Success of Sustainability. VEETHIKA-Int. Interdiscip. Res. J. 2023, 9, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, C.; Coelho, A.; Marques, A. The greenwashing effects on corporate reputation and brand hate, through environmental performance and green perceived risk. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2023, 16, 655–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prihatiningrum, R.Y.; Supraptiningsih, J.D.; Lutfi, L.; Imron, A.; Fithoni, A. Sustainable Marketing Strategies: Aligning Brand Values with Consumer Demand for Environmental Responsibility. Glob. Int. J. Innov. Res. 2024, 2, 2271–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenis, N.D.; van Herpen, E.; van der Lans, I.A.; van Trijp, H.C.M. Partially Green, Wholly Deceptive? How Consumers Respond to (In)Consistently Sustainable Packaged Products in the Presence of Sustainability Claims. J. Advert. 2022, 52, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, J. Green marketing and consumer attitudes. Open Access Res. J. Multidiscip. Stud. 2024, 8, 076–084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanchana, P. Green Marketing in the Age of Sustainability: Consumer perceptions and brand strategy. Nanotechnol. Percept. 2024, 20 (Suppl. S16), 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulfikar, I. Building a Strong Brand: Marketing Strategy to Increase Brand Awareness and Consumer Loyalty. Neo J. Econ. Soc. Humanit. 2023, 1, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, A.A.-T. Theory of repeat purchase behavior (TRPB): A case of green hotel visitors of Bangladesh. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2023, 9, 462–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, K.; Agnihotri, H.; Chen, M. Relationship between customer involvement and brand loyalty with moderating role of emotional attachment. Dinkum J. Econ. Manag. Innov. 2023, 2, 174–182. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, S.; Lee, M.; Park, E.; del Pobil, A.P. Determinants of customer brand loyalty in the retail industry: A comparison between national and private brands in South Korea. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troiville, J. Connecting the dots between brand equity and brand loyalty for retailers: The mediating roles of brand attitudes and word-of-mouth communication. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 177, 114650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huimin, C. Research on the Application of Customer Value Theory in Luxury Hotel Customer Relationship Management: A Case Study of JW Marriott Hotel Shenzhen, China. Tour. Manag. Technol. Econ. 2024, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amatulli, C.; De Angelis, M.; Stoppani, A. The appeal of sustainability in luxury hospitality: An investigation on the role of perceived integrity. Tour. Manag. 2021, 83, 104228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rather, R.; Sharma, J. Brand loyalty with hospitality brands: The role of customer brand identification, brand satisfaction and brand commitment. Pac. Bus. Rev. Int. 2016, 1, 76–86. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, C.; Hameed, J.; Zhang, M.; Bin Mohd Ali, A.F.; Nik Hashim, N.A.A. Modeling the impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable purchase intentions: Insights into brand trust and brand loyalty. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2022, 35, 4710–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Buvaneshwaran, V. A comparative study of profitability analysis of selected hotel industries. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2015, 1, 138–141. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, S.; Modgil, S.; Lee, C.K.; Cho, M.; Park, Y. Artificial intelligence enabled robots for stay experience in the hospitality industry in a smart city. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 2331–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elshaer, A.M.; Marzouk, A.M. Memorable tourist experiences: The role of smart tourism technologies and hotel innovations. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2022, 49, 445–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapoor, R.; Kapoor, K. The transition from traditional to digital marketing: A study of the evolution of e-marketing in the Indian hotel industry. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2021, 13, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutti, R.M.; Garcia, F.; Helms, M.M. Entrepreneurship in Peru: A SWOT analysis. Int. J. Entrep. Neurship Small Bus. 2021, 42, 369–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, L.; Hancco, R. Modelamiento y proyección de la demanda de turismo internacional en Puno-Perú. Rev. Bras. De Pesqui. Em Tur. 2020, 14, 34–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larraufie, A.M. First insights on Peruvian luxury consumers. J. Bus. Econ. 2018, 9, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cántaro Márquez, A.L.; Miranda Vásquez, G.F.; Ángeles Barrantes, D. Analysis of eco-innovations in Peruvian accommodation establishments. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ensign, P. Business Models and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koch, F.; Krellenberg, K. How to contextualize SDG 11? Sustainable urban development in Germany. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasper, D.; Shah, A.; Tankha, S. The Framing of Sustainable Consumption and Production in SDG 12. Glob. Policy 2019, 10, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Kopalle, P.K.; Hulland, J. Addressing the greatest global challenges (UN SDGs) with a marketing lens. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2024, 52, 1263–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budarma, I.K.; Astawa, I.K.; Widhari, C.I.S.; Erawati, N.M.R. Competitive Advantage of Green Hospitality Business Practices in 5 Star Hotels in Bali. Tech. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 13, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, C. The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2020, 43, 86–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PromPerú. Tendencias: Perfil del Vacacionista Nacional 2023. TurismoIn. 2023. Available online: https://www.promperu.gob.pe/turismoin/reportes/detallereporte?reporte=301&redireccionar=1#turistaextranjero (accessed on 5 May 2025).
- Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo. Oferta y Demanda de Establecimientos de Hospedaje. 2024. Available online: https://www.mincetur.gob.pe/centro_de_Informacion/mapa_interactivo/ofertaEstablecimientosHospedaje.html (accessed on 5 May 2025).
- Roopa, S.; Rani, M. Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 2012, 46, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohwer, D. Understanding descriptive statistics. In Inquiry in Music Education; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2022; pp. 192–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thangavel, P.; Pathak, P.; Chandra, B. Consumer Decision-making Style of Gen Z: A Generational Cohort Analysis. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2019, 23, 710–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djafarova, E.; Foots, S. Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consum. Insight Ideas Responsible Mark. 2022, 23, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulliner, E.; Riley, M.; Maliene, V. Older People’s Preferences for Housing and Environment Characteristics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichols, B.S.; Holt, J.W. A comparison of sustainability attitudes and intentions across generations and gender: A perspective from U.S. consumers. Cuad. De Gestión 2023, 23, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, A.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.I. Effects of environmental sustainability practice in the economy hotel to Gen Zer’s purchase decision: Behavior economy approach using choice based conjoint analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 118, 103678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyfi, S.; Vo-Thanh, T.; Zaman, M. Hospitality in the age of Gen Z: A critical reflection on evolving customer and workforce expectations. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zlatanov, S.; Đuričanin, J. The evolving interaction between traditional marketing channels and the digital age. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Economy, Management and Information Technologies, Blace, Serbia, 21–23 September 2023; Volume 1, pp. 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, C.G.; Chi, O.H.; Xu, X.; Kennedy, I. Narrowing the intention-behavior gap: The impact of hotel green certification. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 107, 103305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Omar, N.A. The effect of greenwashing on green purchase intention: Perceived betrayal as a mediator and brand loyalty as a moderator. J. Infrastruct. Policy Dev. 2024, 8, 7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A.; Al-Swidi, A.K.; Al-Hakimi, M.A.; Ferraris, A. From greenwashing to brand avoidance: The roles of perceived risk, trust and negative word-of-mouth. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2025. Ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, M.Z.; Silawi, A.; Haque, M.I.; Fatima, Z. Impact of Green Marketing on Brand Image and Eco-Friendly Environment of Travel & Tourism Sector. Migr. Lett. 2024, 21, 755–770. [Google Scholar]
- Dwipamurti, I.G.A.N.; Mawardi, M.K.; Nuralam, I.P. The effect of green marketing on brand image and purchase decision (Study on consumer of Starbucks Café Ubud, Gianyar Bali). J. Adm. Bisnis 2018, 61, 41. [Google Scholar]
- Majeed, M.U.; Aslam, S.; Murtaza, S.A.; Attila, S.; Molnár, E. Green marketing approaches and their impact on green purchase intentions: Mediating role of green brand image and consumer beliefs towards the environment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | N | % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 92 | 44.7% |
Female | 114 | 55.3% |
Age | ||
18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 68 | 33.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 59 | 28.6% |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 48 | 23.3% |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 31 | 15.0% |
Visit to a 5-star hotel in Lima City area in the last year | ||
Yeah | 206 | 100% |
No | 0 | 0.0% |
Frequency of accommodation | ||
2 times a year | 51 | 24.8% |
2 times a month | 9 | 4.4% |
Every 3 months | 19 | 9.2% |
Every 4 months | 26 | 12.6% |
Once a year | 92 | 44.7% |
Once a month | 9 | 4.4% |
Motivation for lodging | ||
Good location | 17 | 8.3% |
Exceptional quality of service | 60 | 29.1% |
Luxury amenities and facilities | 59 | 28.6% |
Events held | 16 | 7.8% |
Exceptional gastronomy | 5 | 2.4% |
Promotions and offers | 26 | 12.6% |
Hotel reputation and brand | 14 | 6.8% |
Services and amenities | 9 | 4.4% |
Affirmation | Age Range | Totally Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Totally Agree | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I feel emotionally satisfied staying at this hotel knowing that it is committed to sustainable and environmentally friendly practices. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 1.5% | 0.0% | 11.8% | 45.6% | 41.2% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 3.4% | 8.5% | 62.7% | 25.4% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 6.3% | 0.0% | 16.7% | 47.9% | 29.2% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 6.5% | 3.2% | 16.1% | 48.4% | 25.8% | 100.0% | |
Total | 2.9% | 1.5% | 12.6% | 51.5% | 31.6% | 100.0% | |
This hotel’s attention to green initiatives increases my perception that the hotel cares about me and values me as a person committed to caring for the environment. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 1.5% | 27.9% | 44.1% | 26.5% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.2% | 69.5% | 20.3% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 6.3% | 2.1% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 25.8% | 48.4% | 22.6% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 1.0% | 19.9% | 53.4% | 23.8% | 100.0% | |
The sustainable practices of this hotel contribute to the preservation of the environment. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 1.5% | 22.1% | 48.5% | 27.9% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 3.4% | 11.9% | 59.3% | 25.4% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 6.3% | 0.0% | 8.3% | 54.2% | 31.3% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 6.5% | 0.0% | 16.1% | 61.3% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 2.4% | 1.5% | 15.0% | 54.9% | 26.2% | 100.0% | |
The benefits I get from staying at this hotel are greater than those I would get at other establishments without these practices. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 27.9% | 42.6% | 29.4% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 18.6% | 52.5% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 8.3% | 14.6% | 50.0% | 22.9% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 6.5% | 0.0% | 19.4% | 58.1% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 2.4% | 20.9% | 49.5% | 25.2% | 100.0% |
Affirmation | Age Range | Totally Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Totally Agree | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This hotel has a strong reputation for its commitment to sustainable practices. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 26.5% | 45.6% | 27.9% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 16.9% | 57.6% | 23.7% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 0.0% | 18.8% | 50.0% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 3.2% | 12.9% | 61.3% | 19.4% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.5% | 1.0% | 19.9% | 52.4% | 25.2% | 100.0% | |
The hotel’s awards and recognitions reflect its true commitment to the environment. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 20.6% | 45.6% | 33.8% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 18.6% | 55.9% | 23.7% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 0.0% | 10.4% | 52.1% | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 16.1% | 64.5% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.5% | 0.5% | 17.0% | 52.9% | 28.2% | 100.0% | |
I believe these hotels are committed to continually improving their sustainable practices in the future. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.8% | 58.8% | 29.4% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.6% | 64.4% | 22.0% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 0.0% | 10.4% | 50.0% | 35.4% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 6.5% | 77.4% | 12.9% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.5% | 0.0% | 11.2% | 61.2% | 26.2% | 100.0% | |
The hotel’s employees are knowledgeable and committed to sustainable practices, which is reflected in their customer service. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 2.9% | 20.6% | 54.4% | 22.1% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 15.3% | 50.8% | 32.2% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 2.1% | 20.8% | 45.8% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 6.5% | 0.0% | 19.4% | 58.1% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 1.9% | 18.9% | 51.9% | 25.2% | 100.0% |
Affirmation | Age Range | Totally Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Totally Agree | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This hotel’s communication about its sustainable initiatives is transparent and honest. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 17.6% | 50.0% | 32.4% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 11.9% | 59.3% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 0.0% | 22.9% | 54.2% | 18.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 6.5% | 0.0% | 12.9% | 64.5% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 0.5% | 16.5% | 55.8% | 25.2% | 100.0% | |
The hotel’s facilities reflect its commitment to sustainability through the implementation of renewable energy, efficient waste management and water conservation. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.4% | 63.2% | 29.4% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 3.4% | 11.9% | 59.3% | 25.4% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 2.1% | 0.0% | 14.6% | 60.4% | 22.9% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 25.8% | 54.8% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.0% | 1.0% | 13.1% | 60.2% | 24.8% | 100.0% | |
I trust that this hotel’s commitment to sustainability is long-term and not just a temporary marketing strategy (greenwashing). | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 1.5% | 0.0% | 20.6% | 60.3% | 17.6% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 11.9% | 55.9% | 30.5% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 2.1% | 10.4% | 54.2% | 29.2% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 16.1% | 61.3% | 19.4% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 1.0% | 15.0% | 57.8% | 24.3% | 100.0% | |
This hotel delivers on its promises in terms of sustainability. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.2% | 58.8% | 27.9% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.2% | 62.7% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 2.1% | 2.1% | 25.0% | 41.7% | 29.2% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 3.2% | 19.4% | 61.3% | 12.9% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.0% | 1.0% | 16.0% | 56.3% | 25.7% | 100.0% |
Affirmation | Age Range | Totally Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Totally Agree | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hotels that apply green marketing strategies are my first choice when looking for accommodation in the Lima area. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 1.5% | 2.9% | 23.5% | 47.1% | 25.0% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 3.4% | 23.7% | 54.2% | 18.6% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 6.3% | 8.3% | 29.2% | 37.5% | 18.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 6.5% | 35.5% | 51.6% | 6.5% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.9% | 4.9% | 26.7% | 47.6% | 18.9% | 100.0% | |
I feel emotionally connected to this hotel brand because of its commitment to sustainability. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 2.9% | 22.1% | 47.1% | 27.9% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 3.4% | 15.3% | 62.7% | 18.6% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 4.2% | 20.8% | 50.0% | 20.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 32.3% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.0% | 2.9% | 21.4% | 53.9% | 20.9% | 100.0% | |
There is a high probability that I will choose to book my stay at this type of hotel again. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.4% | 58.8% | 33.8% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 64.4% | 20.3% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 2.1% | 4.2% | 16.7% | 52.1% | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 16.1% | 67.7% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 0.5% | 1.0% | 13.1% | 60.2% | 25.2% | 100.0% | |
I always recommend this type of hotel to family and friends visiting the area. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 16.2% | 51.5% | 32.4% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 13.6% | 67.8% | 16.9% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 4.2% | 4.2% | 20.8% | 47.9% | 22.9% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 3.2% | 19.4% | 67.7% | 9.7% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.0% | 1.9% | 17.0% | 57.8% | 22.3% | 100.0% |
Affirmation | Age Range | Totally Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Totally Agree | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I always research this hotel’s environmental policy and sustainable practices before booking. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 1.5% | 10.3% | 42.6% | 33.8% | 11.8% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 1.7% | 3.4% | 23.7% | 50.8% | 20.3% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 10.4% | 6.3% | 20.8% | 41.7% | 20.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 6.5% | 35.5% | 54.8% | 3.2% | 100.0% | |
Total | 3.4% | 6.8% | 31.1% | 43.7% | 15.0% | 100.0% | |
I consider that the implementation of green marketing strategies by this hotel for my purchasing preference is: | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 38.2% | 38.2% | 23.5% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 1.7% | 5.1% | 32.2% | 49.2% | 11.9% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 2.1% | 12.5% | 29.2% | 37.5% | 18.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 3.2% | 25.8% | 61.3% | 6.5% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.5% | 4.9% | 32.5% | 44.7% | 16.5% | 100.0% | |
I value the sustainable practices that this hotel applies and consider them important to improve my satisfaction. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 1.5% | 0.0% | 11.8% | 50.0% | 36.8% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15.3% | 64.4% | 20.3% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 0.0% | 4.2% | 12.5% | 58.3% | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 3.2% | 0.0% | 29.0% | 54.8% | 12.9% | 100.0% | |
Total | 1.0% | 1.0% | 15.5% | 56.8% | 25.7% | 100.0% | |
I believe that the prices of this hotel’s services are justified by its service and its commitment to sustainability. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.8% | 51.5% | 36.8% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 18.6% | 52.5% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 0.0% | 8.3% | 12.5% | 60.4% | 18.8% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 3.2% | 29.0% | 64.5% | 3.2% | 100.0% | |
Total | 0.0% | 2.9% | 16.5% | 55.8% | 24.8% | 100.0% | |
The implementation of sustainable practices at this hotel positively influences my perception of the quality of its services. | 18 to 25 years old (Generation Z) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.7% | 42.6% | 42.6% | 100.0% |
26 to 40 years old (Millennials) | 0.0% | 1.7% | 13.6% | 59.3% | 25.4% | 100.0% | |
41 to 55 years old (Generation X) | 2.1% | 4.2% | 14.6% | 52.1% | 27.1% | 100.0% | |
56 to 76 years old (Baby Boomers) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 16.1% | 67.7% | 16.1% | 100.0% | |
Total | 0.5% | 1.5% | 14.6% | 53.4% | 30.1% | 100.0% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Brañes, L.; Gamarra, M.F.; Guillen, N.K.; Regalado, M. Avoiding Greenwashing Through the Application of Effective Green Marketing: The Case of Hospitality Industry in Lima City—Peru. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177605
Brañes L, Gamarra MF, Guillen NK, Regalado M. Avoiding Greenwashing Through the Application of Effective Green Marketing: The Case of Hospitality Industry in Lima City—Peru. Sustainability. 2025; 17(17):7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177605
Chicago/Turabian StyleBrañes, Laleczka, Maria Fernanda Gamarra, Nancy Karen Guillen, and Mónica Regalado. 2025. "Avoiding Greenwashing Through the Application of Effective Green Marketing: The Case of Hospitality Industry in Lima City—Peru" Sustainability 17, no. 17: 7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177605
APA StyleBrañes, L., Gamarra, M. F., Guillen, N. K., & Regalado, M. (2025). Avoiding Greenwashing Through the Application of Effective Green Marketing: The Case of Hospitality Industry in Lima City—Peru. Sustainability, 17(17), 7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177605