Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for Convergence Competencies in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences for Sustainable Futures in the South Korean Context
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Convergence Education for Sustainable Futures: Paradigm Shifts and Competency Demands
2.2. Review of Previous Research on Convergence Competencies
2.3. Managerial Problems in Higher Education Addressed by This Study
3. Materials and Methods
- (1)
- Literature review and conceptual framework development;
- (2)
- Item generation;
- (3)
- Expert Delphi validation;
- (4)
- Empirical testing and statistical validation.
3.1. Literature Review and Preliminary Item Development
3.2. Expert Delphi Survey
3.3. Pilot Study: Exploratory Factor Analysis and Reliability Testing
3.4. Main Study: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Finalization of the Tool
3.5. Ethical Considerations
4. Results
4.1. Synthesis of Previous Research and Derivation of the Diagnostic Tool Framework
4.2. Definition, Components, and Preliminary Items of Future Convergence Competencies: Findings from the Delphi Survey
4.3. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Reliability Results
4.4. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.5. Finalized Items
5. Conclusions and Implications
5.1. Practical and Policy Implications
5.1.1. Use as a Feedback Tool for Convergence Curriculum
5.1.2. Design of Personalized Learning Pathways Based on Diagnostic Results
5.1.3. Expansion Across Fields and Policy Integration
5.1.4. Faculty Development and Pedagogical Innovation
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Managerial Implications for Educational Institutions
5.4. Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
STEM | Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics |
HASS | Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences |
CVR | Content Validity Ratio |
ESD | Education for Sustainable Development |
SGDs | Sustainable Development Goals |
IoT | Internet of Things |
WEF | World Economic Forum |
EFA | Exploratory Factor Analysis |
CFA | Confirmatory Factor Analysis |
IRB | Institutional Review Board |
HUSS | Humanities Utmost Sharing System |
IQR | Interquartile Range |
KMO | Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin |
MOOC | Massive Open Online Courses |
PBL | Problem Based Learning |
SEM | Structural Equation Modeling |
References
- UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2020; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Redman, A.; Wiek, A. Competencies for advancing transformations towards sustainability. Front. Educ. 2021, 6, 785163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bammer, G. Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems; ANU Press: Canberra, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brassler, M.; Dettmers, J. How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—Interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdiscip. J. Probl.-Based Learn. 2017, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braßler, M. Interdisciplinary problem-based learning—A student-centered pedagogy to teach social sustainable development in higher education. In Teaching Education for Sustainable Development at University Level; Leal Filho, W., Pace, P., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiek, A.; Withycombe, L.; Redman, C.L. Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustain. Sci. 2011, 6, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brundiers, K.; Barth, M.; Cebrián, G.; Cohen, M.; Diaz, L.; Doucette-Remington, S.; Dripps, W.; Habron, G.; Harré, N.; Jarchow, M.; et al. Key Competencies in Sustainability in Higher Education—Toward an Agreed-Upon Reference Framework. Sustain. Sci. 2021, 16, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, J.A.; Miller, K.; Perea-Vicente, J.L. Academic entrepreneurship in the humanities and social sciences: A systematic literature review and research agenda. J. Technol. Transf. 2024, 49, 1880–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huh, J. A study on limitations and possibilities of convergence education in engineering. J. Eng. Educ. Res. 2019, 22, 46–54. Available online: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201910537995444.page (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Padmanabhan, J. Integration of Education for Sustainable Development with Competency-Based Education. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohd-Barkati/publication/385936886_Education_Technology_and_Sustainability/links/673ef9c888177c79e83c9cbb/Education-Technology-and-Sustainability.pdf#page=35 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Kim, H.; Ryou, O. Case study of development of competency-based convergence subject in higher education: Focused on the development guidelines and principles of ‘Practice on Manufacturing Systems’. J. Learn.-Cent. Curr. Instr. 2021, 21, 767–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H. Development of university convergence major standards to promote key competencies. J. Holist. Converg. Educ. 2020, 24, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, B. Current diagnosis for convergence education and measures to improve convergence capacity. Korean J. Gen. Educ. 2016, 10, 13–35. Available online: https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002178341 (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- World Economic Forum (WEF). The Future of Jobs Report 2023; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- World Economic Forum (WEF). The Future of Jobs Report 2025; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Jones, P.; Selby, D.; Sterling, S. More than the sum of their parts? Interdisciplinarity and sustainability. In Sustainability Education; Jones, P., Selby, D., Sterling, S., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2010; pp. 17–37. [Google Scholar]
- Usca, N.; Samaniego, M.; Yerbabuena, C.; Pérez, I. Arts and humanities education: A systematic review of emerging technologies and their contribution to social well-being. Soc. Sci. 2024, 13, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novis-Deutsch, N.; Cohen, E.; Alexander, H.; Rahamian, L.; Gavish, U.; Glick, O.; Mann, A. Interdisciplinary learning in the humanities: Knowledge building and identity work. J. Learn. Sci. 2024, 33, 284–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amsler, S.; Facer, K. Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: Exploring alternative educational orientations to the future. Futures 2017, 94, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, T.L. Competencies and pedagogies for sustainability education: A roadmap for sustainability studies program development in colleges and universities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Haan, G. Gestaltungskompetenz als Kompetenzkonzept der Bildung für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Kompetenzen der Bildung für Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Operationalisierung, Messung, Rahmenbedingungen, Befunde; Beltz: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; pp. 23–43. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gerhard-De-Haan/publication/226689376_Gestaltungskompetenz_als_Kompetenzkonzept_der_Bildung_fur_nachhaltige_Entwicklung/links/56c4562608ae7fd4625a1755/Gestaltungskompetenz-als-Kompetenzkonzept-der-Bildung-fuer-nachhaltige-Entwicklung.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2025).
- Sposab, K.; Rieckmann, M. Development of sustainability competencies in secondary school education: A scoping literature review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annelin, A.; Boström, G.O. An Assessment of Key Sustainability Competencies: A Review of Scales and Propositions for Validation. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2022, 24, 53–69. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijshe-05-2022-0166/full/html (accessed on 21 June 2025). [CrossRef]
- Vare, P.; Arro, G.; de Hamer, A.; Del Gobbo, G.; de Vries, G.; Farioli, F.; Kadji-Beltran, C.; Kangur, M.; Mayer, M.; Millican, R.; et al. Devising a competence-based training program for educators of sustainable development: Lessons learned. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venn, R.; Perez, P.; Vandenbussche, V. Competencies of sustainability professionals: An empirical study on key competencies for sustainability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawshe, C.H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers. Psychol. 1975, 28, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sipos, Y.; Battisti, B.; Grimm, K. Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands and heart. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2008, 9, 68–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterling, S.; Thomas, I. Education for sustainability: The role of capabilities in guiding university curricula. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 2006, 1, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearins, K.; Springett, D. Educating for sustainability: Developing critical skills. J. Manag. Educ. 2003, 27, 188–204. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1052562903251411 (accessed on 24 June 2025). [CrossRef]
- Rieckmann, M. Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures 2012, 44, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crofton, F. Educating for sustainability: Opportunities in undergraduate engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 2000, 8, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frisk, E.; Larson, K. Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. J. Sustain. Educ. 2011. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/3083852613/71A9703D44AF4176PQ/1?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals (accessed on 24 June 2025).
- Lans, T.; Blok, V.; Wesselink, R. Learning apart and together: Towards an integrated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 62, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.U. Enhancing students and learning achievement as 21st-century skills through transdisciplinary approaches. In Transdisciplinary Approaches to Learning Outcomes in Higher Education; Kumar, R., Ong, E., Anggoro, S., Toh, T., Eds.; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 220–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeidan, H.; Rai, S.S.; Zweekhorst, M.B. Transdisciplinary competencies for transformation. In Transdisciplinarity for Transformation: Responding to Societal Challenges through Multi-Actor, Reflexive Practices; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 469–495. [Google Scholar]
Competency Cluster | Definition | Related Key Competencies | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Multidisciplinary Openness | A mindset characterized by openness and curiosity toward diverse academic fields, new perspectives, and unfamiliar knowledge and phenomena | Systems thinking, Holistic thinking, Interdisciplinary work, Transdisciplinarity, Openness, Diversity of perspectives, Curiosity | [7,30,31] |
Integrative Willingness | A proactive orientation to view issues and phenomena through the convergence of various perspectives, knowledge, and information | Values-thinking Competency, Value diversity, Reflexivity, Participation, Trans-cultural understanding, Empathy, Inclusion | [7,31,32,33] |
Convergent Learning | The ability to analyze and synthesize knowledge across disciplines to derive new insights through reasoning and reflection | Strategic-thinking Competency, Problem-solving, Critical thinking, Learning for change | [7,33,34] |
Collaborative Convergence | The social ability to communicate and cooperate effectively with individuals from diverse academic backgrounds and information domains | Interpersonal Competency, Communication, Collaboration, Conflict resolution, Solidarity, Networking, Building teams, Social engagement | [7,30,35] |
Futures Literacy | The competency to identify signals of future change, make data-informed predictions, and define emerging tasks and challenges | Futures-thinking Competency, Anticipatory thinking, Foresight, Scenario creation, Trans-generational thinking, Identifying signals | [7,33,34] |
Future Efficacy | The self-efficacy and social agency to proactively engage with uncertain futures and generate positive transformation | Implementation Competency, Change agency, Action-taking, Social responsibility | [7,30,33] |
Version | Definition | M (SD) | CVR |
---|---|---|---|
Initial Draft | The ability to create new convergent values required by future society through understanding and integrative thinking across various academic domains | 4.00 (1.22) | 0.60 |
Final Version (Revised after the Delphi Survey) | The ability to create novel and meaningful values required by future society and industries through understanding and integrative thinking across various academic domains | 4.70 (0.45) | 1.00 |
Competency Domain | Sub-Competency | Definition | Round 2 M (SD) | CVR | Round 3 M (SD) | CVR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Convergent Attitudes | Multidisciplinary Openness | A mindset of openness and curiosity toward various academic fields, perspectives, and knowledge when observing phenomena | 4.1 (0.831) | 0.80 | 4.3 (0.640) | 1.00 |
Integrative Mindset/Willingness | The willingness to engage in convergent thinking across diverse and novel perspectives to understand and address problems and phenomena | 4.0 (1.000) | 0.80 | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.00 | |
Convergent Knowledge | Understanding of Integrative Knowledge | The capacity to comprehend various disciplines and perspectives through a convergence-oriented lens | 4.2 (0.872) | 0.80 | 4.4 (0.490) | 1.00 |
Convergent Learning | The ability to analyze and synthesize diverse disciplinary knowledge and perspectives to generate new insights through reasoning | 4.2 (0.979) | 0.80 | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.00 | |
Convergent Practice | Collaborative Communication | The capacity to communicate and collaborate effectively with individuals from various academic backgrounds based on shared information and knowledge | 4.2 (0.979) | 0.80 | 4.3 (0.900) | 0.80 |
Convergent Problem-Solving | The competency to examine diverse perspectives and alternatives to propose convergent solutions to complex problems | 3.7 (1.100) | 0.60 | 4.3 (0.640) | 1.00 | |
Futures Orientation | Futures Literacy | The ability to identify and define future problems and goals through structured foresight and exploration | 4.2 (1.077) | 0.80 | 4.3 (0.900) | 1.00 |
Future Efficacy | The ability to accept ambiguity and uncertainty in the future and to make meaningful choices and actions that influence oneself, organizations, and society | 3.8 (0.980) | 0.80 | 4.3 (0.900) | 1.00 |
Competency Cluster | Item No. | Draft | Final | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M (SD) | CVR | Revision Status | Revised Item | M (SD) | CVR | ||
Multidisciplinary Openness | 1 | 3.8 (1.249) | 0.800 | Retained | I believe that people may think differently depending on their environment or culture. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.6 (1.497) | 0.600 | Revised | I acknowledge the perspectives of peers who hold views different from mine. | 4.8 (0.400) | 1.000 | |
3 | 4.3 (0.900) | 0.800 | Retained | I actively incorporate diverse contexts and information when solving problems. | 4.7 (0.458) | 1.000 | |
4 | 3.3 (0.900) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
5 | 3.5 (1.118) | 0.600 | Revised | I believe it is important to learn about various subjects and academic disciplines. | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.000 | |
6 | 2.6 (1.019) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.0 (1.095) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
8 | 2.9 (0.943) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
9 | 3.4 (1.357) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
10 | 3.3 (1.005) | 0.800 | Revised | I enjoy asking questions about various subjects and academic fields. | 4.2 (0.872) | 1.000 | |
11 | 3.6 (1.200) | 0.800 | Revised | I am curious about new knowledge related to various subjects and academic fields. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 | |
Integrative Mindset/Willingness | 1 | 3.7 (1.418) | 0.600 | Revised | I try to explain complex situations by applying knowledge from various fields. | 4.7 (0.458) | 1.000 |
2 | 4.0 (1.1832) | 0.800 | Revised | I try to utilize knowledge from multiple disciplines when creating new outcomes. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 | |
3 | 3.4 (1.281) | 0.400 | Revised | I try to solve problems by integrating knowledge from various domains. | 4.3 (0.781) | 1.000 | |
4 | 4.0 (0.894) | 0.800 | Revised | I try to apply interdisciplinary knowledge to solve problems. | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.000 | |
5 | 3.3 (1.345) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
6 | 3.2 (1.249) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.5 (1.432) | 0.400 | Revised | I am open to thinking from the perspective of experts in other fields. | 4.0 (0.775) | 0.800 | |
8 | 3.1 (1.300) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
9 | 3.1 (1.300) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
Understanding of Integrative Knowledge | 1 | 3.7 (0.781) | 0.800 | Revised | I tend to apply diverse knowledge and experiences when solving problems. | 4.3 (0.640) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.8 (1.327) | 0.600 | Revised | When needed, I actively seek to understand knowledge from unfamiliar fields. | 4.1 (1.044) | 0.800 | |
3 | 3.7 (1.269) | 0.600 | Revised | I try to understand various disciplines to approach problems comprehensively. | 4.0 (1.183) | 0.600 | |
4 | 4.1 (0.943) | 0.800 | Revised | I believe it is necessary to understand knowledge from diverse fields depending on the problem context. | 4.6 (0.916) | 0.800 | |
5 | 3.7 (1.269) | 0.600 | Revised | I believe that real-world problems are interconnected across multiple domains of knowledge. | 4.4 (1.019) | 0.800 | |
6 | 3.1 (1.300) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.5 (1.360) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
8 | 3.7 (1.005) | 0.600 | Revised | I can generate new ideas by combining interrelated knowledge. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 | |
9 | 3.8 (1.166) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
10 | 3.7 (1.187) | 0.600 | Retained | I try to learn new knowledge from a variety of disciplines. | 3.9 (1.044) | 0.800 | |
11 | 3.1 (1.044) | 0.600 | Retained | I enjoy working on collaborative projects with students from different majors, such as engineering, humanities, or arts. | 4.1 (1.221) | 0.600 | |
12 | 3.1 (1.300) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
Integrated Learning for Convergence | 1 | 2.8 (1.166) | 0.000 | Deleted | – | ||
2 | 3.0 (1.341) | 0.200 | Deleted | – | |||
3 | 3.3 (1.345) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
4 | 3.4 (1.200) | 0.600 | Retained | I am able to identify links between different academic disciplines. | 4.2 (0.748) | 1.000 | |
5 | 3.6 (1.281) | 0.600 | Retained | I can discover connections between seemingly unrelated things or phenomena and integrate them appropriately. | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.000 | |
6 | 3.8 (1.327) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.2 (1.400) | 0.600 | Revised | I make an effort to find connections between my major and other disciplines. | 4.3 (0.900) | 0.800 | |
8 | 4.0 (1.183) | 0.800 | Revised | I can comprehend and internalize new knowledge and apply it to other domains. | 4.4 (0.489) | 1.000 | |
9 | 3.8 (1.166) | 0.800 | Retained | I strive to integrate newly acquired knowledge and information with my existing understanding. | 4.4 (0.916) | 0.800 | |
10 | 3.6 (1.200) | 0.800 | Retained | I often think about how to combine my disciplinary knowledge with other fields. | 4.0 (1.000) | 0.800 | |
Convergent Communication and Collaboration | 1 | 4.2 (0.872) | 0.800 | Retained | I respect diverse viewpoints and can work cooperatively with individuals who hold different perspectives. | 4.5 (0.500) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.6 (1.019) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
3 | 4.1 (0.943) | 0.800 | Revised | I can co-construct and expand new knowledge and understanding through interactions with others. | 4.7 (0.458) | 1.000 | |
4 | 4.3 (1.005) | 0.800 | Retained | I am able to accept information, knowledge, and viewpoints from fields outside of my own major. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 | |
5 | 3.7 (0.900) | 0.800 | Retained | I am open to accepting ideas that differ from my own. | 4.6 (0.489) | 1.000 | |
6 | 4.3 (0.900) | 0.800 | Retained | I can communicate and collaborate with individuals from different academic disciplines or perspectives. | 4.7 (0.458) | 1.000 | |
7 | 3.4 (1.200) | 0.800 | Deleted | – | |||
8 | 3.3 (1.100) | 0.800 | Deleted | – | |||
9 | 3.5 (1.360) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
10 | 3.8 (1.166) | 0.800 | Retained | I enjoy learning through mutual communication between my field of study and other disciplines. | 4.5 (0.500) | 1.000 | |
Convergent Problem Solving | 1 | 3.8 (1.166) | 0.600 | Retained | I can gather relevant information about a problem and derive a valid solution. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.4 (1.114) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
3 | 3.6 (1.114) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
4 | 3.5 (1.432) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
5 | 3.0 (0.894) | 0.400 | Retained | I can apply diverse perspectives to solve problems and identify their success factors. | 4.0 (0.894) | 0.800 | |
6 | 3.2 (0.979) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.5 (1.025) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
8 | 3.5 (1.025) | 0.600 | Revised | I seek solutions to problems from multiple perspectives. | 4.7 (0.458) | 1.000 | |
9 | 3.4 (1.019) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
10 | 3.7 (1.345) | 0.400 | Revised | I can prioritize and choose the most effective and appropriate method for solving a problem. | 4.2 (0.979) | 0.800 | |
11 | 4.0 (0.894) | 0.800 | Retained | I can search for the information needed to solve a problem using multiple methods. | 4.5 (0.500) | 1.000 | |
12 | 3.6 (1.114) | 0.600 | Retained | I can set criteria to decide among various problem-solving approaches. | 4.1 (1.044) | 0.800 | |
Future Issue Recognition | 1 | 3.5 (0.922) | 0.600 | Revised | I become interested when I hear about future technologies or societal changes. | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.1 (1.136) | 0.400 | Retained | I enjoy discussing future technologies and societal changes. | 4.4 (0.800) | 1.000 | |
3 | 3.2 (1.327) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
4 | 4.2 (0.979) | 0.800 | Deleted | – | |||
5 | 3.6 (1.114) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
6 | 3.3 (1.269) | 0.400 | Deleted | – | |||
7 | 3.6 (1.114) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
8 | 3.6 (1.114) | 0.600 | Deleted | – | |||
9 | 3.7 (1.100) | 0.600 | Revised | I can identify and analyze errors or hidden intentions in future-related information. | 4.2 (0.871) | 1.000 | |
10 | 4.1 (0.943) | 0.800 | Revised | I can compare and analyze various sources to understand different perspectives on the future. | 4.6 (0.489) | 1.000 | |
11 | 4.0 (1.000) | 0.800 | Revised | I can recognize and predict patterns of change based on future-related information. | 4.4 (0.663) | 1.000 | |
12 | 3.9 (1.044) | 0.800 | Revised | I can synthesize past and present data to derive implications for the future. | 4.6 (0.489) | 1.000 | |
Future Efficacy | 1 | 3.9 (0.943) | 0.800 | Retained | I believe that today’s choices and actions can change our future. | 4.6 (0.663) | 1.000 |
2 | 3.6 (1.281) | 0.600 | Revised | I believe that present decisions can influence future outcomes. | 4.5 (0.671) | 1.000 | |
3 | 4.1 (0.943) | 0.800 | Revised | I believe it is important to take actions that bring positive change in the future. | 4.6 (0.663) | 1.000 | |
4 | 3.3 (1.486) | 0.400 | Revised | Even in the face of an uncertain future, I can respond with a willingness to change. | 4.2 (1.166) | 0.800 | |
5 | 3.7 (1.005) | 0.600 | Retained | Even when others are pessimistic about the future, I believe we can develop responses together. | 4.2 (1.249) | 0.800 | |
6 | 3.7 (1.269) | 0.600 | Retained | I am confident that I can overcome various difficulties in preparing for the future. | 4.2 (1.166) | 0.800 |
Factor Name | Item Codes | Normality Test | Factor | Reliability | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Skewness | Kurtosis | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Communality | |||
Convergent Commitment (Factor 1) | CH07 | −1.011 | 0.574 | 0.735 | 0.175 | 0.063 | 0.218 | 0.223 | 0.655 | 0.866 |
CH06 | −1.042 | 0.779 | 0.717 | 0.133 | 0.110 | 0.279 | 0.189 | 0.643 | ||
CH08 | −1.137 | 1.344 | 0.686 | 0.176 | 0.199 | 0.219 | 0.187 | 0.620 | ||
CH05 | −1.012 | 0.893 | 0.620 | 0.212 | 0.177 | 0.190 | 0.235 | 0.560 | ||
Future Problem Awareness (Factor 2) | CH18 | −1.100 | 0.955 | 0.183 | 0.757 | 0.180 | 0.256 | 0.071 | 0.666 | 0.866 |
CH16 | −1.187 | 0.729 | 0.127 | 0.747 | 0.148 | 0.228 | 0.132 | 0.610 | ||
CH19 | −0.979 | 0.345 | 0.223 | 0.598 | 0.202 | 0.295 | 0.142 | 0.568 | ||
CH17 | −0.957 | 0.183 | 0.224 | 0.589 | 0.286 | 0.300 | 0.221 | 0.648 | ||
Future Efficacy (Factor 3) | CH21 | −1.768 | 3.797 | 0.135 | 0.104 | 0.790 | 0.108 | 0.126 | 0.639 | 0.839 |
CH22 | −2.047 | 5.699 | 0.125 | 0.173 | 0.772 | 0.118 | 0.108 | 0.652 | ||
CH20 | −1.447 | 2.684 | 0.101 | 0.152 | 0.714 | 0.160 | 0.134 | 0.596 | ||
CH24 | −1.467 | 2.320 | 0.153 | 0.392 | 0.520 | 0.110 | 0.117 | 0.439 | ||
Convergent Learning (Factor 4) | CH11 | −0.612 | 0.268 | 0.241 | 0.257 | 0.067 | 0.668 | 0.156 | 0.577 | 0.816 |
CH12 | −0.740 | 0.229 | 0.249 | 0.214 | 0.182 | 0.607 | 0.121 | 0.517 | ||
CH13 | −0.726 | 0.497 | 0.247 | 0.245 | 0.206 | 0.600 | 0.122 | 0.549 | ||
CH10 | −0.472 | 0.129 | 0.177 | 0.238 | 0.115 | 0.577 | 0.179 | 0.462 | ||
Multidisciplinary Inclusiveness (Factor 5) | CH04 | −1.187 | 0.933 | 0.243 | 0.189 | 0.096 | 0.183 | 0.720 | 0.654 | 0.758 |
CH03 | −2.151 | 6.130 | 0.209 | 0.234 | 0.037 | 0.158 | 0.659 | 0.538 | ||
CH02 | −1.491 | 3.398 | 0.164 | −0.020 | 0.241 | 0.090 | 0.604 | 0.470 | ||
CH01 | −2.136 | 6.011 | 0.359 | 0.104 | 0.228 | 0.136 | 0.571 | 0.495 | ||
Eigenvalue | 6.034 | 2.653 | 2.201 | 1.645 | 1.411 | |||||
% Variance Explained | 30.169 | 13.265 | 11.007 | 8.225 | 7.055 | |||||
Cumulative % Variance | 30.169 | 43.434 | 54.441 | 62.666 | 69.721 |
χ2 (df) | NFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|
378.786 (160) | 0.921 | 0.937 | 0.952 | 0.054 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jung, H.; Song, I.; Noh, Y. Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for Convergence Competencies in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences for Sustainable Futures in the South Korean Context. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157131
Jung H, Song I, Noh Y. Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for Convergence Competencies in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences for Sustainable Futures in the South Korean Context. Sustainability. 2025; 17(15):7131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157131
Chicago/Turabian StyleJung, Hyojung, Inyoung Song, and Younghee Noh. 2025. "Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for Convergence Competencies in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences for Sustainable Futures in the South Korean Context" Sustainability 17, no. 15: 7131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157131
APA StyleJung, H., Song, I., & Noh, Y. (2025). Development and Validation of a Self-Assessment Tool for Convergence Competencies in Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences for Sustainable Futures in the South Korean Context. Sustainability, 17(15), 7131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157131