Methodological Reflection on Sustainable Tourism in Protected Natural Areas

Abstract

The objective is to present the theoretical contributions offered by the methodology for studying sustainable tourism in protected natural areas, capable of promoting environmental protection and sustainable local development in communities. This research was carried out in Machalilla National Park. The deductive method was applied, which allowed for the analysis of the problem, the consultation of general theories related to the topic studied, and the establishment of premises and objectives that led to conclusions on the topic studied. A mixed research approach was used, integrating contributions from the analyses carried out for the treatment and processing of information. The techniques used included a survey of tourism stakeholders, a semantic differential for tourists, and an expert evaluation method to validate the proposal under study. The theoretical and methodological systematisation of tourism sustainability in protected natural areas was achieved. The results show the need to broaden the scientific debate and transfer knowledge on the relevance of sustainable tourism as an alternative for sustainable development in rural communities.

1. Introduction

The environment is a tourist resource par excellence. It offers the landscapes, ecosystems, and conditions required for various leisure and recreational activities. In this sense, its preservation is essential to ensure the continuity of tourism and the sustainable progress of local communities [1,2]. Tourist destinations such as beaches, mountains, jungles, and deserts depend on the natural environment. The conservation of natural spaces promotes ecotourism and sustainable tourism. Indigenous communities depend on ecological balance to maintain their customs and livelihoods as part of their cultural traditions [3,4].

Effective tourism management requires responsible economic management, the proper use of resources, the equitable distribution of benefits, and the reduction in environmental impact in the interests of community progress [5]. It has a significant impact on the economy of local communities. Its implementation promotes the diversification of employment sources by increasing competitiveness and encouraging the development of tourism infrastructure. It is an important source of income and contributes to the socio-economic and environmental development of localities, especially those located within protected natural areas [6].

Sustainable eco-tourism is a type of tourist activity that seeks to reduce the impact on the environment, preserve biodiversity, and benefit local communities. In contrast to traditional tourism, ecotourism focuses on environmental education, effective resource management, and the direct involvement of host communities in promoting tourism [7]. Nature tourism is a type of activity focused on the exploration and enjoyment of natural environments, which seeks to preserve the environment and promote appreciation of biodiversity. It is distinguished by its development in protected natural areas, rural areas, and unique ecosystems, where tourists can engage in outdoor activities with the least possible ecological impact [8].

Sustainability in the tourism sector is based on the promotion of the effective and efficient use of natural resources and the preservation of biodiversity for the benefit of local communities. It promotes long-term economic viability to ensure that tourism is profitable without jeopardising the well-being of future generations [9]. Protected natural areas are established and managed for the purpose of preserving biodiversity, ecosystems, and natural resources, restricting human actions that may alter their stability. These places are essential for environmental protection, sustainable tourism, and environmental education [10].

There are several types of protected natural areas. National parks are areas of significant ecological value that are strictly protected to ensure the conservation of biodiversity, ecosystems, and natural landscapes, and are the most important conservation objective within a system of protected areas. Nature reserves, often referred to as ecological, biological, or wildlife reserves, are protected natural areas specifically designed for the conservation of species, habitats, and key ecological processes. They are more specialised than national parks, which are created for the conservation of specific species and ecosystems. Natural monuments are designated for the conservation of unique geological, biological, and landscape features, which may be rock formations, endemic species, reefs, caves, or other outstanding natural phenomena. Unlike parks, they are more specific in their focus, although they are equally vital for biodiversity and science. Biosphere reserves are areas recognised by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Science and Culture through the Man and the Biosphere programme, which seeks to harmonise biodiversity conservation with sustainable development and scientific research. Unlike other protected areas such as national parks and natural monuments, they are not areas where humans are excluded, but rather spaces for promoting a model of sustainable coexistence between humans and nature. Wildlife sanctuaries are areas created with the specific function of conserving essential habitats for threatened or endangered species, and, unlike other areas such as national parks or biosphere reserves, they have a more specific focus on ensuring the survival of critically vulnerable fauna and flora through the strict protection of their natural environment. Marine protected areas are areas of the ocean that are legally designated for the conservation of marine biodiversity, the restoration of damaged ecosystems, and the sustainable management of aquatic resources. Unlike terrestrial protected areas, they face unique challenges due to their connection to international waters, industrial fishing, and the effects of climate change [10].

Today, sustainable tourism is essential for social progress due to its cultural, environmental, and socio-economic impacts. Conventional methodologies related to the study of tourism question the sustainability of territories due to their high consumption of energy and natural resources and the generation of social inequalities [11]. As a socioeconomic activity, it employs 200 million people and represents 4.4% of the world’s gross domestic product. The sector can promote sustainable management at the community level as a market-oriented alternative and serve a growing number of travellers seeking to discover, understand, and enjoy the natural environment through sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas [12].

With outdated and poorly paid agricultural production systems, Latin America is experiencing a socio-economic depression with a high degree of social marginalisation. In this context, the search for socio-economic alternatives that allow for an increase in family income through responsible tourism practices stands out [13]. Methodologies are needed to promote a type of tourism that respects nature and humanity, reduces the consumption of natural resources, and puts an end to the excessive production of pollutants in the soil, air, and water basins [14].

It is necessary to appeal to what is known as complementary tourism, within which sustainable tourism in protected natural areas is an interesting option as an appropriate way of diversifying destinations linked to new forms of leisure [15]. Tourism is undergoing a progressive diversification of products and destinations, with an increase in demand for nature tourism, ecotourism activities, visits to protected natural areas, and community-based rural tourism. In order for the travel experience to be meaningful, tourists seek direct contact with the local culture, cultural authenticity, connection with local communities, and direct contact with flora, fauna, exceptional ecosystems, nature in general, and its preservation [12].

In protected natural areas, the relationships arising from tourism are always complicated and sometimes conflictive. However, it is feasible to regulate them in an environment where there is an appropriate balance between tourism management, environmental protection interests, and the benefits to society. Based on criteria such as environmental preservation, social equity, quality of life, and respect for cultural identity, ecotourism and forms of sustainable tourism are becoming increasingly important in the sustainable development paradigm [16,17]. The authors Flores and Guerrero [18,19] proposed methodologies for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas and refer to the existence of theoretical gaps in the formulation of sustainable tourism principles. Companies and businesses in the tourism sector often adopt voluntary and fragmented strategies, without a defined methodology to ensure their overall effectiveness in economic, environmental, and social aspects [20].

Tourism in protected areas is a complex and multidisciplinary discipline that shows gaps in research related to the balance between conservation, sustainable development, and the tourist experience. Some research focuses on immediate effects, but there is little evidence of cumulative effects, such as alteration of fauna, soil erosion, or modification of natural cycles. Further study is needed on informal activities such as unregistered visitors or illegal tourism and their effect on sensitive areas.

Other research gaps are linked to the lack of agreement on the calculation of physical, ecological, and social carrying capacity for different types of ecosystems, as well as the lack of dynamic models that take into account climate change, visitor variations, and ecological resilience. Many studies do not delve deeply into the analysis of the advantages or disadvantages that tourism brings to local communities, nor do they incorporate indigenous knowledge into tourism management without folklorising or exploiting it.

From this point of view, the methodology on sustainable tourism in protected areas is an important contribution, as it aims to comprehensively incorporate the study of the complex relationships between tourism and protected natural areas through an interdisciplinary approach that considers ecological, economic and social science components, as well as their impact on improving the living conditions of host communities as part of balanced socio-economic growth and local development.

Based on the above analysis, the research problem consists of: What is the contribution of the methodology for studying sustainable tourism in protected natural areas in the interests of environmental protection, sociocultural inclusion, participatory governance, and sustainable and endogenous local economic development of communities?

The analysis of the research problem aims to fill the gaps and offer a theoretical contribution related to the application of sustainable tourism in protected natural areas, in order to provide the foundations for the design of more efficient and sustainable strategies.

Based on the problem outlined above, the objective of this research is to propose a theoretical and methodological contribution to the study of sustainable tourism in protected natural areas, with the capacity to promote environmental protection and sustainable local development in host communities.

The starting point is the premise that large investments in tourism infrastructure are not required and that the approach is based on the satisfaction of resources through an endogenous perspective, the protection of natural resources, and the preservation of nature to encourage visitors to engage in rewarding activities and consume local resources that are attractive and offer unique experiences for tourists.

The tourism sector is highly cross-cutting, which must be taken into account when focusing on research. In this case, we will focus on the theoretical and methodological contributions of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas.

1.1. A Literature Review

1.1.1. Definition and Background of Protected Natural Areas

A protected area is a land or sea territory dedicated to the preservation and protection of biological diversity and related natural and cultural resources. It is generally managed through legal instruments and other effective territorial, national, and international regulations. Some protected areas share the context of a rural area [21].

Protected natural areas are a cultural construct with a long history. Two millennia ago, particular areas dedicated to the preservation of natural resources began to be identified in India [22]. A millennium ago, they were used in Europe to protect the hunting grounds of the rich and powerful. In other regions, they are used to protect places with special characteristics, such as the traditional Tapu areas in Pacific communities and, in Africa, for the protection of sacred forests [23].

During the Renaissance, European kings and other leaders decreed the first protected areas. Subsequently, the public gradually began to visit places declared as protected areas; the foundations of tourism were laid, and community participation was linked to these areas [12].

In 1832, in the United States of America, the creation of a state park for environmental conservation was proposed, but it was not until 1872 that Yellowstone Park was created as a public space and recreational area for the benefit and enjoyment of the population [12,24].

In Australia, in 1866, a 2000-hectare environmental reserve was established for protection and tourism [25]. In 1885, Canada decreed the protection of the hot springs in the Rockies, which later became Banff National Park, where railway companies saw an opportunity to create a park and stimulate growth in the number of travellers and tourism. At the end of the 19th century, several forest reserves were created in South Africa. In 1894, Tongariro National Park was created in New Zealand [12].

A common feature of all protected natural areas is that they were created on government initiative, with large areas of natural environments set aside for public enjoyment, which is why the promotion of tourism was a key factor in their creation [12].

The connection between the population, their customs, and culture with the land and natural resources as part of the concept of protected natural areas is a key element in achieving the proposed environmental protection objectives [26].

In the 20th century, the declaration of protected areas spread globally. Almost all countries published laws and designated certain areas for protection. At the beginning of the 21st century, around 44,000 areas were designated as protected, representing approximately 10% of the Earth’s surface [26].

The evolution of the concept and significance of protected natural areas has been influenced by the development of ecology, which has led to a more comprehensive understanding of resource planning and management with a systematic and systemic approach. This has enabled the adequate classification of protected natural areas, reframing biodiversity protection as a starting point and recognising the importance of tourism as a key aspect for the promotion of social culture [27].

The relevance of protected natural areas is enhanced by the introduction of tourism, which, due to its endogenous nature, could be understood as part of the park tourism system. The economic importance of protected natural areas is increasingly valued in terms of their environmental performance, which includes controlling the effects of climate change and providing drinking water [28,29].

Since the adoption of the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1992, greater attention has been paid to protected natural areas as a means of conserving biodiversity and for other purposes [30].

Some protected natural areas are part of international networks, which may be global or regional in scope. There are calls for recognition of the role of indigenous peoples in relation to these areas [31], as well as for the promotion of international cooperation in transboundary protected natural areas [32].

Recreation and tourism management are among the purposes of the categories of protected natural areas, except for category Ia, which corresponds to strict nature reserves managed for scientific purposes. Biodiversity protection is not the only purpose, although a special policy to protect and maintain biodiversity is required [33].

Marine protected areas have gained greater recognition in recent years. There are more than 2000 marine protected areas, covering approximately 2.5 million km². These include terrestrial areas, reefs, seagrass beds, shipwrecks, archaeological sites, coastal brackish lagoons, mudflats, marshes, mangroves, and rock platforms [34].

The complexity of managing protected natural areas indicates that much remains to be accomplished to improve the effectiveness of their management [35]. A key consideration is that when tourism is developed, precise management frameworks and strategies should be established to ensure that the natural and cultural values of protected natural areas are maintained.

Regardless of the tourist activities carried out in the context of protected natural areas, access to other areas for tourism purposes must be carefully monitored. This is a significant challenge that involves making complex judgements about the trade-offs between tourism development, the protection of resource values, and the interests of the local community [35].

Tourism in protected natural areas is being revitalised based on the concept of tourists. The need for close encounters with others in order to interact with exotic populations and landscapes, and the search for a return to nature as a source of physical and mental health, are ideological concepts that favour the choice of tourism based on the unique environment of protected natural areas [36].

Sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas seeks to offer interesting spaces and leisure activities that emerge from unique experiences based on the exchange of diverse cultures and the enjoyment of natural landscapes, satisfying tourists’ preferences and a return to nature [36].

In the management of tourism in the context of protected natural areas, in addition to the activities that allow direct contact with local functions and resources, cultural exchange is important as it encourages an insight into manifestations rooted in ancestral culture that form an inseparable part of the identity of peoples. Visits to museums play an important role in education and the preservation of local, regional, and national identity [37,38]. Visits to archaeological areas and sites are particularly attractive to visitors who prefer to enjoy the historical and cultural values of the community [39].

Figure 1 shows the categorical classification of protected natural areas.

1.1.2. Protected Natural Areas in Ecuador

Protected natural areas in Ecuador were established in accordance with Section 7 of the Organic Environmental Code, published in 2017. This document establishes that protected natural areas are integrated into the National System of Protected Areas and defines the categories, guidelines, tools, and mechanisms for their management [40].

The idea of tourism in protected natural areas in Ecuador dates back to the 1980s, driven by the influx and boom in rural and indigenous tourism, which emerged as a result of the exploitation of natural resources by oil companies and large agricultural enterprises [41].

At the international level, several experiences influenced the development of tourism in Ecuador’s protected natural areas. In 1999, interest in the debate on ecological issues and sustainability among academics fostered the development of research focused on community-based tourism based on participatory planning and the distribution of economic benefits to social sectors in Belize [42]. The experiences gained were welcomed in Ecuador by community ecotourism, based on community initiatives to participate in sustainable tourism to improve the living conditions of host communities and promote local control of small-scale tourism, experiences that benefited the development of tourism in the context of protected natural areas.

Another international experience that influenced the development of tourism in protected natural areas in Ecuador took place in the Dominican Republic in 2004 through the development of a project with a modelled approach for the evaluation of integrated systems and transdisciplinary analysis to conceptualise the impacts of different types of tourism, considering the interrelationship between ecology, economy and society [43]. The experiences generated by the project led to suggestions for promoting tourism development in different contexts, including Ecuadorian initiatives in protected natural areas.

In 2007, in the rural community of Taquile Island in Peru, research was conducted to analyse the performance and influence of external intermediaries and mediators in sustainable tourism [44]. The experiences of the project served to analyse the consequences of competition and transport control in tourist facilities developed in the context of protected areas. It was possible to identify the need to further study the impacts of intermediation and mediation, particularly in relation to investment, the performance of the Ecuadorian public sector, and the participation of actors from the host communities.

In 1979, the first tourism venture located within the boundaries of a protected natural area in Ecuador emerged in the community of Agua Blanca in the Machalilla National Park in the province of Manabí [45]. Weak promotion and marketing prevented the venture from becoming known nationally and internationally, and as a result, tourist numbers were very low. Another difficulty that affected the development of this type of tourism is related to the lack of confidence on the part of tourism stakeholders in the territory, who did not adequately consider its potential as an interesting offer for the demand profile linked to nature tourism and indigenous tourism.

Currently, sustainable tourism is being promoted in Ecuador’s protected natural areas, based on the principles of social responsibility and the circular economy. In this regard, environmental protection protocols are being promoted among tourists in the interest of creating an innovative and endogenous environment that will enable the challenges posed by the changing situation in today’s world to be met and compliance with the institutional regulatory framework, self-regulation associated with protection, and high environmental awareness to be ensured, thereby guaranteeing the success of tourism in protected natural areas [46].

1.1.3. Dimensions and Indicators of Sustainability

Loor-Bravo, Plaza-Macías, and Medina-Valdés reflected on the challenges facing tourism and considered that the sector’s sustainability cannot be sustained by unrealistic discourse and projects that deviate from the dimensions and fulfilment of sustainability indicators [47].

Sustainable tourism aims to balance economic, social, environmental, cultural, and educational dimensions to ensure long-term benefits for the local community and visitors.

Tourism sustainability indicators are metrics used to assess and measure the economic, social, and environmental impact of tourism activities on the environment. They are essential to ensure that tourism practices are sustainable in the long term, to benefit local communities and the environment, and to meet visitors’ expectations [48].

The methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas is based on compliance with a set of indicators that place environmental protection and community development at the centre of the debate and determine the sustainability of tourism management in the context of protected natural areas; this allows for a process of continuous evaluation and improvement, which will enable the evaluation and improvement of tourism activity based on the actual situation in which it takes place [49].

Figure 2 shows the dimensions of sustainable tourism [50].

The importance of sustainability indicators for tourism lies in the fact that they are tools used to ensure that tourism is not only a source of income and development for communities, but also an environmentally friendly and socially responsible activity [51].

Tourism sustainability indicators enable the identification of areas for continuous improvement and the implementation of more sustainable and efficient practices. They promote transparency and accountability in management and improve trust and support from the community and visitors. They provide essential information for informed decision-making by tourism stakeholders, governments, and non-governmental organisations. They enable the identification of areas for improvement and the implementation of sustainable and efficient practices. They help to promote and disseminate good practices and serve as a reference for other tourism projects [51].

The objective of implementing sustainable tourism indicators in protected natural areas is to provide a methodology with a practical and structured tool that guarantees increased effectiveness in tourism management processes. The findings facilitate the identification of difficulties and non-compliance in relation to tourism sustainability and enable the establishment of guidelines and measures for decision-making in institutions, with the aim of advancing the management of tourist destinations that are developed in the context of protected areas.

Sustainable tourism indicators were established within the framework of protected natural areas, based on three specific instruments: the database of tourism indicators published by the World Tourism Organisation in 2005 [52]; the tourism sustainability index [53] as a tool for measuring the impact of tourism on a destination; and the Ecuador Tourism Indicator System [54] as initial information in the process of determining specific indicators of tourism sustainability in the context of protected areas.

The sustainable development indicators for tourist destinations formed the database for the analysis of tourism sustainability in the field of protected natural areas and are based on the collection of systematised data that facilitate the comparative and progressive study of a destination. It basically includes economic, socio-cultural, environmental, and governance-related data, as well as other variables that facilitate the characterisation of the destination and the administrative processes related to public administration and the development of key tourism business elements [55].

Based on the tourism sustainability index, an additional index is developed that facilitates the integrated interpretation of the results through statistical data representative of the value of tourism sustainability in the context of protected natural areas. It allows comparisons to be made between different situations over time in the same destination to facilitate decision-making based on the evolutionary characterisation and the effect of measures and actions that can be applied successively.

The Ecuador Tourism Indicator System provides specific data for the sustainable management of destinations and decision-making in the Ecuadorian tourism management process, with data updated until 2024.

The development of sustainable tourism indicators in protected natural areas is based on research carried out in 2022 by the authors [56], who used a three-dimensional design and 18 simple indicators, which were adapted and modified for this project, where four dimensions and 12 simple indicators were designed.

Figure 3 shows the indicators of sustainable tourism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spatial and Temporal Delimitation

The development of tourism in Ecuador as an economic activity began in 1930 with the enactment of the Tourism Promotion Act. At the end of the first half of the 20th century, operations began with the creation of the first travel agency called Ecuadorian Tours, which started to develop different types of mass tourism. In subsequent years, other forms of alternative tourism emerged as an important socio-economic factor in economically and socially vulnerable areas, especially those in rural environments [57].

The study population is made up of the National System of Protected Areas of Ecuador, which covers 26,208,785.38 ha and represents 19.42% of the territory. Due to the country’s geographical location, there is a high level of biodiversity. It has 14 national parks: Machalilla, Cayambe, Coca, Cotacachi–Cayapas, Cotopaxi, Llanganates, Sangay, El Cajas, Podocarpus, Yacuri, Antisana, Sumaco–Napo–Galeras, Río Negro Sopladora, and Yasuní T/T [58]. Figure 4 shows a map of the geographical location of Ecuador, which reflects the location of protected natural areas.

The sample is intentionally non-probabilistic based on the study objectives and population characteristics and consists of Machalilla National Park (PNM), which, according to Ecuadorian law, is a protected natural area (ANP) located in the coastal territory of the province of Manabí. It occupies part of the municipal territories of Puerto López and Jipijapa, in the parishes of Puerto Cayo, Machalilla, Julcuy, and Puerto López [58].

Figure 5 shows a map of Ecuador with the location of the province of Manabí, where Machalilla National Park is located.

On 26 July 1979, a community tourism establishment was founded in the community of Agua Blanca, located within the boundaries of Machalilla National Park [39], which is part of Ecuador’s national system of protected areas. It takes its name from one of the earliest cultures that inhabited the Pacific coast of Ecuador between 1800 and 1000 BC. It covers a large land and sea area with significant biodiversity of flora and fauna, due to the presence of the country’s last tropical dry forest, with more than 150 endemic species. The marine environment is a nesting site for the four species of turtles registered in Ecuador and a mating ground for humpback whales [58].

Tourist attractions in the PNM include Los Frailes beach, Isla de la Plata, and the community of Agua Blanca. There are important archaeological sites that document human occupation dating back 5000 years, making the archaeological museum in Agua Blanca a special attraction for visitors.

The families living on the boundaries of the PNM are engaged in activities related to agriculture, small livestock farming, artisanal fishing, and some women spend their time making handicrafts. The social situation is not satisfactory, and it is common to find small towns with a high degree of socioeconomic vulnerability. The communities of Salaite and Pueblo Nuevo are located on the coast, and their main economic activity is artisanal fishing. The rest are surrounded by mountainous terrain and subsist on small farms, as is the case in San Isidro, Cerro Mero, Julcuy, Platanales, and El Pital. The site known as Guale stands out, where the Agua Blanca tourist facility is located, which has achieved a certain level of sustainable development in terms of the enhancement of its natural and cultural resources from a community-based organisational structure that is closely linked to the environment in a sustainable manner [58,59].

Hence, the importance of addressing sustainable tourism as a key element for the sustainability of family and local socio-economic development, which is one of the determining factors of the PNM as a tourist destination. This can represent a demand profile for visitors interested in this type of tourism, which guarantees safety and unique and unrepeatable experiences. This research was conducted between 10 March and 30 November 2024.

2.2. Methodology Applied

It takes a mixed approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research, which enables the problem to be analysed based on the premises of sustainability applied to tourism in protected natural areas located within national parks, in order to reach accurate conclusions on the subject studied. The method of consulting experts on sustainable tourism in protected natural areas was considered.

This research is based on the deductive method, which enabled the assessment of the research problem, the contextualisation and reinforcement of general theories related to sustainable tourism in protected natural areas, the operationalisation of variables, their dimensions and indicators, the analysis and statistical processing of data, and the draw-ing of accurate conclusions on the meaning of sustainable tourism, as well as the need to integrate these concepts into tourism research to contribute to the reinforcement of existing theories and the advancement of science for local development in communities.

Figure 6 presents the diagram of the methodology applied to this research.

This research is deductive, analytical, descriptive, and explanatory, which allowed for the analysis of the literature consulted to discover the significance of sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas. The contributions of qualitative and quantitative analyses are integrated into the treatment and processing of the survey results and the assessment of the experts.

Among the methods applied is historical–logical analysis, which allowed for the examination of tourism development in protected areas located in natural parks from its beginnings as an economic activity and the emergence of tourism as an alternative for rural communities.

A comprehensive systematic review of the literature and primary source documents was conducted, which allowed for the analysis of scientific articles, theses, books, and other documents related to the subject of study from their different conceptual denominations. The selection of documents included a rigorous review of the related literature, with special attention to publications from 2018 to 2024. Descriptive statistical analysis was applied in this study using the statistical package for social sciences SPSS version 25.0.

A geographic information system was used to collect, manage, analyse, and visualise geographic information related to the area studied [60].

A structured survey was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of 30 volunteers involved in tourism management in the territory, of whom 10 were from the PNM tourism sector and 20 were tourism stakeholders in the province of Manabí. The survey consisted of a Likert scale on sustainable tourism indicators, in the specific conditions of protected natural areas, consisting of five values where 1 meant the highest degree of disagreement and 5 the highest degree of agreement with the indicators to be evaluated.

A semantic differential survey related to sustainable tourism indicators was administered to 20 tourists enjoying the tourist attractions of Agua Blanca and Los Frailes beach, with the aim of verifying the significance of sustainable tourism for community development, poverty reduction, and the precarious situation of families in the specific conditions of protected natural areas. The instruments were applied throughout 2024. The semantic differential was developed in Spanish, English, and French to facilitate its application and processing.

A mixed research approach relevant to the nature of the object of study was used, integrating the strengths of the qualitative and quantitative approaches [61].

This research provides theoretical assessments of the methodology for studying tour-ism sustainability in protected natural areas as an alternative form of development, which is set to become a key economic activity based on the use of endogenous resources, the re-placement of extractive, exploitative, and environmentally polluting economic activities, in order to reduce poverty and social insecurity in the localities located within the boundaries of protected natural areas.

In theoretical terms, the result is based on the theoretical and methodological systematisation of other models and methodologies related to rural tourism, community tourism, and sustainable tourism, in line with the results of the research carried out by [62,63,64]. As a practical scientific result, a methodology for the study of sustainable tourism in protected natural areas is presented and validated by expert criteria, as well as a graphic illustration of the stages and phases that comprise it and its rationale.

2.3. Expert Evaluation Method

Experts were selected to carry out assessments related to sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas. A structured survey with a Likert scale was used, which allowed for the examination of elements related to the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas. SPSS version 25.0 software was used for statistical management.

The selection of the sample of experts was based on a target population of 21 experts in sustainable tourism. A non-probabilistic technique was used to select nine experts, with the aim of collecting significant data that would enable the evaluation of the proposed methodology and its contribution as a scientific result, based on a system of evaluative indicators.

The inclusion criteria were the selection of those who demonstrated the highest levels of competence (K), with proven prestige and professionalism recognised by society, who had had a teaching or practical working relationship in sustainable tourism and nature tourism in protected areas for five years or more, and who were representative of their places of origin.

The level of competence was used to assess the experts’ experience, using the coefficient k = ½ (kc + ka), where kc represents a measure of the level of knowledge on the subject under investigation and ka a measure of the sources of argumentation [65]. This method was developed by [66] to establish an acceptance level higher than 0.8.

Equation (1) was applied to select the experts.

$$M=P(1-P)\left({\displaystyle \frac{K}{i^2}}\right)$$

(1)

$$M=9$$

where

M → number of experts;

i → desired level of accuracy (0.10);

P → estimated proportion of errors made by the experts (0.01);

K → constant, whose value is associated with the chosen confidence level (8.8584).

Substituting the values in the expression, the result is that nine experts are needed.

Another criterion for the inclusion of the nine selected experts was their informed consent and agreement to participate in this study. Those who did not express their informed consent to participate in this research were excluded. A gender approach was applied to achieve parity, resulting in five female and four male experts.

Validation was carried out to determine reliability by applying a pilot study that identified ambiguous or poorly correlated items. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was applied to measure the internal consistency of the items, with a value of 0.79, which indicates good reliability.

Content validity was demonstrated through review by experts with sufficient knowledge of sustainable tourism, ecotourism, and the concept of responsible tourism, construct validity through a qualitative analysis that verified that the survey items coherently grouped the theoretical dimensions, and criterion validity by comparing the results with other indicators proposed by authors cited in the theoretical framework of this research and by instruments applied in previous studies.

With regard to sample size, it should be noted that protected areas tend to have a limited target population (managers, guides, specialised visitors, and local communities) and limited logistical and economic resources in remote or difficult-to-access contexts, which restricts the study sample.

On the other hand, the qualitative and exploratory approach delves deeper into and understands complex phenomena better than statistical generalisation. Representativeness may be sufficient if the sample includes key actors and a diversity of perspectives.

In exploratory studies, validity is based on the richness of the information and theoretical saturation rather than on the number of cases; therefore, statistical generalisation is not sought, but rather contextual understanding and the generation of hypotheses.

It was, therefore, decided to carry out convenience sampling, selecting accessible and available participants based on relevant characteristics defined by the limitations and vulnerabilities of protected natural areas.

It should be noted that the use of small samples is common and accepted in qualitative, exploratory, or case studies, especially in contexts that are difficult to access or with small populations, as is the case in many protected areas dedicated to ecotourism. The key lies in the careful selection of participants and methodological transparency in justifying sampling decisions.

Machalilla Park was selected for this study rather than another park, taking into account the aspects considered by the researchers: biodiversity and ecological importance; cultural and archaeological relevance; diverse ecosystems represented; active presence of local communities; legal protection, recognition, experience and track record in ecotourism; accessibility and connectivity; zoning and size; climatic and environmental conditions; and diversity of tourist offerings.

It should be noted that the tourism stakeholders included in this sample included local residents who are key players in the operation, improvement, and management of sustainable tourism. This allows for the analysis of the social appropriation of ecotourism, its benefits, the effectiveness of community participation, and its challenges. They are highly representative of roles and sectors in the community, have knowledge and experience of the relationship between conservation and tourism, and contribute a diversity of perspectives, contextual knowledge, identification of socio-cultural impacts, and promote the applicability and relevance of the research results. From an ethical point of view, voluntary participation, informed consent, local knowledge, and the cultural diversity of the host communities were taken into account.

For the evaluation of the methodology by the experts, various indicators related to validity criteria were taken into account, such as practical value, feasibility, practical applicability, development prospects, significance, innovative nature, and versatility.

The criteria for use address integrative capacity, simplicity and ease of use, affordability for participants, adoption of international regulations, general structural definition, and adaptability to changes in the environment.

To assess the correspondence of the experts’ criteria, the following hypothesis was established: H0: R1 = R2 = … Rn, where the average ranks of the experts’ evaluations are similar to each other. H1: At least one of the average ranks of the experts’ evaluations differs from the rest. Critical region: asymptotic sigma ≤ 0.05 (5% significance). Similarly, the analysis of the average ranks was established to determine the differences in assessments in the aforementioned criteria, referring to the criteria of validity and use. The analysis is complemented by the determination of the medians per criterion, which allows for the central tendency measures to be confirmed.

In the interest of evaluating the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas, the components to be evaluated by the experts were established through descriptive statistics, in order to rate the validity criteria and the use criteria.

For the evaluation of the proposed methodology, the components to be evaluated by the experts through descriptive statistics were established in order to examine the content of the validity criteria and the criteria for use illustrated in the tables and graphs.

3. Results

3.1. Survey of Tourism Managers

All tourism managers in the territory who were selected for this sample participated voluntarily. Fifty-seven per cent of participants were male, and 43 per cent were female. Thirty-two per cent had completed higher education; 55 per cent had completed secondary education, and 13 per cent had completed basic education.

In terms of age, 86.5% were between 21 and 35 years old.

Table 1. Assessment of basic indicators of sustainable tourism in the PNM.

Indicators	Description	Frequencies	Participation
			Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree Nor Disagree (Indifferent)	Agree	Strongly Agree
			(1 Point)	(2 Points)	(3 Points)	(4 Points)	(5 Points)
Economic	Tourism generates additional income for the community.	30	0	2	4	18	6
Sociocultural	The local community is involved and benefits from tourism, with a higher level of environmental awareness.		0	1	4	10	15
Environmental	Tourism promotes soil, water, and biodiversity conservation. It encourages endogenism, the use of renewable sources, recycling, and the reuse of resources.		1	3	5	12	9
Governance	Land use planning, management policies, and the regulatory framework promote tourism, innovation, and continuous improvement in the sector.		2	1	2	13	12

shows the results of this survey conducted among tourism managers in the territory on the assessment of basic indicators of sustainable tourism in protected natural areas.

Figure 7 shows the average ratings given by tourism managers in the territory for the basic indicators of sustainable tourism.

3.2. Tourist Survey

The sample of 20 selected tourists consists of visitors who volunteered to participate in the survey on condition of anonymity. Forty-five per cent are male, and 55 per cent are female. Eighty per cent are domestic tourists, and 20 per cent are international tourists from Peru and Spain. Twenty-five per cent have completed higher education; 50% have completed secondary education, and 25% have completed primary education. In terms of age, 30% are under 20 years old; 40% are between 21 and 35 years old; 20% are between 36 and 60 years old, and 10% are over 60 years old.

Table 2. Results of the semantic differential.

Indicators	Identification Code	Participation
		Uncertain	Indifferent	True
Generates additional income for the community.	Gaic	0	2	18
Generates employment for the community.	Gec	0	1	19
It generates social benefits for the community.	Gsbc	0	3	17
Promotes sustainable agriculture and environmental protection.	Psaep	1	3	16
It contributes to improving the living conditions of the community.	Cilcc	0	3	17
Promotes the protection of soil, water, diversity and endogenism.	Ppswde	1	3	16
Encourages waste management and resource recycling.	Ewmrr	0	2	18
Promotes the efficient use and saving of energy.	Pese	0	2	18
Encourages the use of renewable energy sources.	Eres	0	5	15

shows the results of the semantic differential applied to the sample of tourists on the assessment of sustainable tourism indicators in protected natural areas.

Figure 8 shows a graphical analysis related to the semantic differential on the assessment of sustainable tourism indicators.

3.3. Expert Assessment

The experts carried out the assessments and awarded the corresponding scores in the survey using a Likert scale, where 1 represented the highest level of disagreement and 5 represented the highest level of agreement on the elements to be assessed in relation to the methodology, validity criteria, and use.

Table 3. Evaluation of validity criteria.

Indicators	Rating According to Expert Judgement									W de Kendall 0.181 Chi-square 6.5 Asymptotic sig 0.37
	E1	E2	E3	E4	E5	E6	E7	E8	E9
Practical value	5	4	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Viability	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Employability	5	5	5	5	4	5	5	5	4
Development perspective	5	5	4	5	5	5	5	5	5
Transcendence	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Innovative character	5	5	4	5	5	5	5	5	5
Versatility	5	5	5	5	4	5	5	5	4
Kendall’s W value 0.063	Chi-square 2.222			Asymptotic sig 0.818

shows the results of the experts’ assessment of the validity criteria of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas.

The low Kendall’s W value suggests that the experts did not discriminate well between criteria, so applying the Delphi method allowed for a more robust and defensible consensus to be reached.

Each criterion was evaluated by nine experts, and the following data were calculated for each one:

• Mean and median;
• Standard deviation;
• IQR (interquartile range)—useful for determining consensus.

Although Kendall’s W coefficient was very low, the Delphi results show that there is no great dispersion (all IQRs = 0.0); most criteria have a median = 5.0, indicating apparent agreement, which explains why W was low: there was agreement but not enough variation for Kendall to detect it.

The results of this analysis are shown in

Table 4. Results of the application of the Delphi method in the search for consensus by experts.

No.	Average		Medium	Standard Deviation	ICR (Interquartile Range)
1	Practical value	4.888888888888889	5.0	0.33333333333333337	0.0
2	Viability	5.0	5.0	0.0	0.0
3	Employability	4.777777777777778	5.0	0.4409585518440984	0.0
4	Development perspective	4.888888888888889	5.0	0.33333333333333337	0.0
5	Transcendence	5.0	5.0	0.0	0.0
6	Innovative character	4.888888888888889	5.0	0.33333333333333337	0.0
7	Versatility	4.777777777777778	5.0	0.4409585518440984	0.0

.

Figure 9 shows the mean and median corresponding to the validity criteria, with the mean shown in “A” and the median in “B”.

Table 5. Evaluation of usage criteria.

Indicators	Rating According to Expert Judgement									W de Kendall 0.1 Chi-square 3.6 Asymptotic sig 0.731
	E1	E2	E3	E4	E5	E6	E7	E8	E9
Integrative capacity	5	5	5	5	5	5	4	5	5
Simplicity and ease of use	5	4	5	5	5	4	4	5	5
Affordability for participants	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Adoption of international regulations	4	5	5	4	5	4	5	4	5
General structural definition	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
Adaptability to changes in the environment	5	4	5	5	4	5	5	5	5
Kendall’s W value 0.209	Chi-square 7.308			Asymptotic sig 0.199

shows the results of the experts’ assessment of the criteria for using the methodology to study tourism sustainability in protected natural areas.

In Table 5 (criteria for use), two criteria showed high dispersion and should be re-evaluated in a second Delphi round:

• Simplicity and ease of use;
• Adoption of international regulations.

Both present the following:

• RIC = 1.0;
• Standard deviation ≥ 0.5.

This indicates that some experts do not share the same assessment and that it is worth exploring the reasons behind these differences.

Therefore, a second round was conducted, in which most criteria had medians of 5 and interquartile ranges (IQR) of 0, indicating very little dispersion in the responses.

Table 6. Results of the second round in application of the Delphi method.

No.	Average	Medium		Standard Deviation	ICR (Interquartile Range)	¿Reassess?
1	Integrative capacity	4.888888888888889	5.0	0.33333333333333337	0.0	False
2	Simplicity and ease of use	4.666666666666667	5.0	0.5	1.0	True
3	Affordability for participants	5.0	5.0	0.0	0.0	False
4	Adoption of international regulations	4.555555555555555	5.0	0.5270462766947298	1.0	True
5	General structural definition	5.0	5.0	0.0	0.0	False
6	Adaptability to changes in the environment	4.777777777777778	5.0	0.4409585518440984	0.0	False

shows the results of this analysis.

Figure 10 shows the mean and median corresponding to the usage criteria. “A” shows the mean, and “B” shows the median.

3.4. Methodology Design

Based on the findings of this research, which incorporated elements related to the study of tourism sustainability in protected natural areas, the proposed methodology is presented below.

Figure 11 shows the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas.

4. Discussion

During this research, the results of a group of authors who conducted research related to sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas located in national parks were considered, which allowed for an appreciation of the importance of their understanding and practical adaptability for the design of the proposed methodology [63,64,67].

For the design of sustainable tourism methodology in protected natural areas, the application and use of this concept involves the practical implementation of a tourism perspective aimed at reducing the adverse effects of the sector on the environment, culture, and local communities, while promoting long-term economic and social benefits for the sector and host communities. Among the main characteristics are the reduction in pollution, the decrease in the consumption of natural resources, the protection of biodiversity and ecosystems, the promotion of the use of renewable energy sources, and eco-efficient practices. The concept of sustainable tourism cuts across all types of tourism [12].

The concept of ecotourism involves engaging in sustainable tourism activities as a specialised form of tourism that focuses on nature, environmental conservation activities, and the benefit of host communities. It takes place in natural environments with the aim of encouraging the observation of flora and fauna without altering habitat conditions. Low-impact infrastructure and equipment are used to prevent pollution and deterioration of the environment, promoting an appreciation of nature among tourists [7,63].

The practice of responsible tourism involves adopting a specific ethical approach within sustainable tourism, focused on promoting behaviour that is inspired by maximising the benefits for local communities, reducing adverse environmental effects, and encouraging conscious decisions by visitors and service providers to ensure the environmental, social, and cultural protection of the territory. The aim is for tourism to generate direct income and job opportunities for the host community [13,68].

During the assessment of the basic indicators of sustainable tourism, it was found that 80% of the tourism managers surveyed agreed and strongly agreed that sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas generates additional economic income that benefits the community through job creation and sustained maintenance, which contributes to the diversification of sources of economic growth, contributing to poverty reduction and improving the living conditions of citizens, in line with the results of research carried out by [12,25,26,27]. Despite this, this study found that 13% of tourism stakeholders were unable to provide a definition and 7% disagreed, which may be due to a lack of knowledge and preparation among some tourism stakeholders regarding the economic impact of the sector’s activity in the context of protected natural areas, in line with research carried out by [69,70,71,72].

In relation to sociocultural indicators, it was found that 83% of tourism managers agree or strongly agree that tourism involves participation and provides clear social benefits for the local community. It promotes education and awareness of sustainable practices in the local community and among visitors, as well as improving the quality of life of families and the local community, in line with the analysis carried out by [13].

However, it was found that 13% of the tourism stakeholders surveyed were indifferent, and 3% disagreed with the above statement. This problem may be influenced by the lack of knowledge among some tourism stakeholders about the social impact of sustainable tourism on families, the community, and visitors themselves, in line with the analysis carried out by [14].

With regard to environmental indicators, it was found that 70% of the tourism managers surveyed agree and strongly agree that tourism promotes the protection of soil, water, and biodiversity, based on an endogenous notion that favours environmental practices and waste management, recycling and reuse of resources, promotes efficient use of energy and the use of renewable sources, which was corroborated by [7,30] in the results of their research. Despite this, it was found that in some cases, there is little information on the relationship between environmental impact and social responsibility in tourism, as well as the objectives that can be achieved with its introduction, in line with the analysis by [73,74].

With regard to governance as an expression of the capacity to meet environmental protection objectives, 83% of the tourism managers surveyed agree and strongly agree that the involvement of the local community in tourism makes it possible and encourages appropriate decision-making, in line with the research carried out by [4,22].

Transparency and access to timely information are analysed as facilitating the proper management of the enterprise, as well as accountability to the community as a control tool for continuous improvement. They appreciate the equitable and fair distribution of benefits as an element that enables the strengthening of performance in tourism [48].

Some tourism managers consider it very important to integrate protection policies with sectoral policies [41] to ensure the proper performance of sustainable tourism management, as well as the long-term maintenance of the protected area’s resources and services in the interest of ensuring the sustainability of tourism [12,75,76].

In relation to the ratings given by tourism sector managers to the basic indicators of sustainable tourism, it can be seen that the most favoured are the socio-cultural indicators, which obtain an average rating of 4.3 points, followed by the governance indicators with 4.1 points. This is due to the impact of sustainable tourism on poverty reduction, improved living conditions, higher education, raising awareness among visitors and the community in general about the maintenance and conservation of the environment and historical and cultural traditions, governance as an instrument for the implementation of public policies that benefit the community, and orderly land-use planning to promote tourism, compliance with environmental regulations, and the promotion of innovation and continuous improvement, according to research by [22,41,43].

The least favourable indicators, but with scores close to 4 points, are economic and environmental. A group of barriers related to the high operating costs necessary for the implementation of sustainability in the tourism sector, the lack of material resources and issues related to the management and organisation of enterprises, the state and condition of infrastructure, the type of ownership, the origin of human resources, fear of undertaking administrative procedures, inadequate interpretation of legal requirements, and lack of preparation and knowledge on the part of tourism managers about sustainable tourism. These difficulties have been highlighted in research carried out by [48,69,70,71,72,73,74,75].

The results of the semantic differential on sustainable tourism revealed that 95% of the tourists surveyed believe that it is capable of generating jobs for the local community [36]. Ninety per cent considered that it generates additional income, encourages waste management and resource recycling, and promotes efficient energy use and savings [39]. Eighty-five per cent said that it generates social benefits for the community and contributes to improving the community’s living conditions [1]. Eighty per cent said that it is capable of promoting environmental protection and encouraging soil, water, diversity, and endogenism conservation [43]. Seventy-five per cent stated that it is capable of promoting the use of renewable energy sources. However, there is a small group that showed an indifferent attitude towards the issues reflected in the survey, and another smaller group was unable to recognise issues such as the capacity of sustainable tourism to ensure the promotion of environmental protection and the potential for promoting soil, water, diversity, and endogenism protection.

The analysis carried out through this research confirmed the cross-cutting and highly diverse nature of sustainable tourism, which was confirmed by consulting the research in [77].

It was verified that previous research has predominantly focused on the economic approach and vision and on the quality of life of communities. There is also research that focuses on ecological and environmental elements, as well as on the entrepreneurial perspective [78,79,80,81].

The design of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas is of significant importance, given the beneficial effects it can have on socio-environmental and economic aspects, ensuring the sustainability of the sector and the territory. It consists of applying a pattern of ethical behaviour that contributes to sustainable development and is reflected in the safeguarding of the environment through nature protection and regenerative tourism practices to support local communities through employment, the promotion of local culture, the improvement of infrastructure for the promotion of conscious trade, respect for human rights, and the fight against exploitative or predatory tourism, in accordance with the analysis by the authors [68,82,83].

The methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas seeks to establish indicators to guide tourism activity in protected areas, ensuring that it is responsible and balanced in accordance with the criteria expressed by [84].

It is proposed to establish a permanent assessment of environmental, socio-cultural, and economic impacts and impacts on governance, as well as the effects on the biodiversity of host communities, in order to facilitate an informed decision-making process for continuous improvement. The aim is for tourists to experience life in a direct and unforgettable way in a protected natural environment, in line with the analysis carried out by [48,85,86].

The starting point is the experience of countries such as Hungary, which applies similar measures to tourism by modifying its National Tourism Development Strategy 2.0, with the aim of implementing a type of tourism that is sustainable and of high quality, benefits the local population, and promotes the comprehensive development of the territory [75].

The preparation of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas is a crucial step in ensuring the thoroughness, structure, and feasibility of the project. Proper organisation facilitates the definition of precise goals, appropriate techniques, and the resources required to enable the project’s success [87].

The benefits of good project preparation include clarity in addressing conflicts arising from tourism in the context of protected natural areas, the appropriate structuring of the theoretical framework that enables the collection of relevant information and data to support the methodology, allowing for the definition of objectives and hypotheses, and the appropriate choice of methods, techniques, and instruments necessary to ensure the optimisation of all types of resources [76].

Preparation for the application of the methodology for the study of tourism sustainability in protected natural areas is conceived as the implementation of a set of organisational and preparatory activities that ensure the collection of data and information related to sustainable tourism indicators, the socio-economic and environmental situation of the context, the real learning needs of the people involved, possible links with research centres, universities and higher technology centres, as well as compliance with the corrective measures prior to this study, in accordance with the analysis carried out by [88].

4.1. First Stage: Design Aspects and Awareness Raising

The successful application of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas requires the development of a process to raise awareness among participants and a robust methodological design. These two components ensure that the project is relevant, scientifically accurate, and has a positive effect in the field of application.

Awareness-raising involves an information process that seeks to engage key stakeholders (researchers, tourism stakeholders, institutions, producers, and communities) and generate commitments on their part. It is a process that generates interest and a willingness to participate, ensuring a more effective study based on the compartmentalisation of information, the collection of the required data, and the collaborative support of the participants. All of this reduces resistance and fear of change and allows for the immediate application of the results, in line with the research carried out by [89].

The first stage involves the design and awareness-raising of the project, which allows for the definition of the general and specific objectives, as well as the analysis of general theories related to sustainable tourism in protected natural areas. This makes it possible to identify gaps that have not been addressed or answered in previous studies and research, and, thus, enables the design of the hypothesis [61,77].

4.2. Second Stage: Diagnosis

The stage known as diagnosis marks the beginning of the practical application of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas. Through fieldwork and direct observation, a diagnosis of the situation presented by the sustainable tourism indicators is carried out. Special attention is given to the analysis of the externalities of the tourism sector. Overtourism and its negative consequences in the social and environmental context, precarious working conditions that do not offer basic safety measures, gender inequality and actions or omissions that contribute to the worsening of climate change, the state of preservation and improvement of natural capital, the optimisation of resource use, the promotion of efficiency, waste reduction, the state of innovation and digitalisation, as well as the creation of value through regenerative cycles.

In this sense, the general objective could be to analyse the negative externalities generated by the tourism sector in the context of protected natural areas [90]. The status of strategies to prevent greenwashing and greenhushing should be assessed, in line with the studies carried out by [77].

It is particularly important to identify and examine the barriers that hinder tourism activity in the context of protected natural areas, the lack of material resources, the state of infrastructure, the type of ownership, and the lack of understanding on the part of tourism stakeholders and society in general, aspects that have been addressed in other studies [91,92,93,94].

At this stage of this methodology, the socio-economic and environmental problems faced by the community are determined in the field, as well as compliance with environmental regulations established by the country and internationally. This situation must be considered during the development of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) matrix, which allows for the identification of internal and external factors that may affect the project. The theoretical and empirical methods to be used, the methodological approach, and the techniques and instruments to be implemented are defined in [95].

The selection of the population and sample for this study is a key activity that ensures the validity, reliability, and representativeness of the results. An appropriately selected sample makes it possible to obtain valid conclusions without having to study the entire population [96].

4.3. Third Stage: Practical Application of the Methodology

The third stage is called the practical application of the methodology for the study of tourism sustainability in protected natural areas. It is characterised by a set of practical actions aimed at achieving the strategic integration of responsible tourism with community actors and the general population, with the aim of training and preparing the people involved in the project as a basic requirement for the development of tourism activities.

The lack of knowledge on the part of tourism managers and stakeholders about the sustainability of the sector is one of the problems that has been studied by other authors [71,72,73].

In this stage, working groups are set up as a space for discussion and collaboration, where experts and participants analyse, debate, and build knowledge related to sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas. Their performance is key to enriching the analysis, validating the findings, and strengthening the decision-making process [97].

The assessment of experts as part of the methodology procedures allows for practical verification to ensure the quality, reliability, and relevance of the project, particularly when it comes to the design of methodologies, models, results studies, and the formulation of conclusions. In this case, experts in sustainable tourism review, analyse, and issue value judgements on the proposed methodology. At the same time, tables and graphs are generated through the management of descriptive statistics related to validity and use criteria, which will be used to measure results based on sustainable tourism indicators in protected natural areas [98,99].

4.4. Fourth Stage: Analysis of Results and Discussion

The analysis of the results and discussion is a fundamental phase of the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas, as it allows for the understanding, structuring, and detailing of the data collected in this study in relation to sustainable tourism in the context of protected areas [100].

This analysis consists of an essential procedure that allows the organisation to process and interpret the information and data obtained in order to reach relevant, comprehensible, and verifiable conclusions, which enable the formulation of hypotheses, the detection of trends, and the creation of new knowledge [101]. The discussion allows for the comparison and contrast of previous findings with existing theories to determine whether the set objectives have been met. Patterns are identified, trends are explained, and possible implications are explored, in accordance with the analysis carried out by [102].

As part of the structure of the analysis and discussion, tables, graphs, and diagrams are shown to illustrate and describe the project’s findings. The interpretation and discussion focus on contrasting the results with previous studies and presenting patterns and trends, which enable a coherent evaluation of the results and the initial hypothesis [103].

The identification and definition of barriers are essential to anticipate difficulties, develop effective tactics, and ensure the achievement of the proposed objectives. In this regard, barriers, challenges, and their possible causes are identified, as well as resource constraints and the need for preparation for tourism in the context of protected natural areas [104].

Finally, a report is prepared with the results of the work. This consists of a document containing the findings of this study. A clear and structured written report supported by evidence is required. It should include the following elements: a cover page and general information, title, authors, affiliations, date of presentation, summary, an introduction reflecting the context of the problem, the general objective and specific objectives, as well as the justification, the methodology setting out the analysis of the population and study sample, the techniques and instruments used and the procedures for analysis, results, discussion and interpretation, conclusions, recommendations, bibliographical references, and any annexes deemed necessary [105].

4.5. Fifth Stage: Feedback

The establishment of cooperation for the proper implementation of the methodology for the study of tourism sustainability in protected natural areas seeks to involve all stakeholders in the sector and society in general, with the aim of achieving the knowledge, skills, and resources required to achieve the proposed common goals efficiently and effectively [106].

Cooperation enhances the strengths of the methodology and optimises results. It facilitates the optimal use of knowledge, infrastructure, and the efficient use of material and financial resources, enhances creative capacities by promoting innovation, expanding the most outstanding ideas, and assisting in the decision-making process [107].

Cooperation acts as a facilitator of communication and coordination to promote a continuous flow of information, preventing confusion and optimising work structuring. From a community perspective, it produces beneficial environmental effects and expands the application of initiatives [108].

For the purposes of the methodology, monitoring results is a crucial systematic procedure, as it facilitates progress assessment and timely problem identification and ensures that objectives are achieved effectively. It is a tool that prevents deviations from the initial plan and allows for corrective action to be taken in a timely manner. It facilitates budget improvement, time management, and efficient use of staff. It optimises decision-making with up-to-date, evidence-based information. It promotes the identification of the project’s strengths and weaknesses. It increases clarity and accountability and promotes the sustainability of results, in line with the analysis by [109].

The continuous improvement plan is implemented as an organised procedure that seeks to constantly increase the efficiency, quality, and results of the methodology during its application. It is based on the recognition of possible improvements and the implementation of corrective and preventive measures that will be carried out on an ongoing basis [110,111].

4.6. Output Results

The results of applying the methodology are the effects or benefits derived from sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas through the introduction of sustainable strategies and good practices aimed at providing benefits to businesses, the community, and the environment. The adoption of responsible management in the tourism sector guarantees economic, social, and environmental benefits.

Achieving competitiveness and distinction is based on attracting customers who are aware of the environmental and social impact. Broader access to financial incentives from governments and international entities is achieved. The reduction in operating costs results from actions to conserve water, energy, and other resources.

In socio-economic terms, sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas promotes the hiring of local employees, boosting the economic growth of the community. It helps to strengthen social infrastructure, education, and the well-being of the inhabitants. It fosters local culture, traditions, and customs through responsible tourism and promotes the inclusion of vulnerable communities in activities related to the tourism sector.

From an environmental protection perspective, it promotes pollution reduction, waste reduction, efficient use of resources, and recycling, as well as the abandonment of exploitative and predatory tourism models. It minimises the carbon footprint associated with tourism and encourages good practices among visitors, communities, and workers.

4.7. Practical and Theoretical Implications

The practical implications of this research focus on improving tourism management alongside environmental protection and the contribution of socio-economic benefits to host communities. The aim is to transform theory into concrete actions through a process of study adapted to local contexts and the coordination of actions between government actors, academia, and communities.

Practical results include the establishment and use of sustainability indicators that allow for the evaluation of the impacts of tourism in real time, in accordance with the analysis carried out by [53]. The establishment of visitor limits in accordance with ecological and social thresholds, staggered schedules and alternative routes, participation of host communities in the decision-making process, use of endogenous materials, renewable energy resources for wastewater treatment and recovery, and bioremediation of eroded land, among others.

5. Conclusions

Based on the results of this research, a methodology for studying tourism sustainability is provided, which constitutes a theoretical contribution aimed at filling a gap related to resolving the conflictive relationship generated by tourism activity in the context of protected natural areas and, at the same time, offering viable solutions for promoting sustainable development for the benefit of local communities and the environment, without neglecting the reasonable profitability of the tourism sector.

The methodological contribution is demonstrated by exposing and demonstrating the close relationship between sustainable tourism and the preservation of natural capital, the promotion of efficiency, the reduction in waste, and the creation of regenerative cycles that form the basis of tourism sustainability. Innovation and digitalisation, as well as the optimisation of resource use, are other principles that are closely associated with sustainable tourism.

Ecuador’s protected natural areas are located in rural areas characterised by poverty, unemployment, and precariousness, with low economic returns from agriculture, livestock, and other activities such as fishing and handicrafts. The application of sustainability principles in protected natural areas is an alternative that allows for income diversification to improve the socioeconomic situation of communities, with the potential to reduce poverty and improve wealth redistribution.

The scientific contribution lies in the methodological nature of the approach itself, as it combines indicators of sustainable tourism and the improvement of living conditions in local communities, filling a gap in the theoretical study of tourism in protected natural areas, where tourism often generates environmental conflicts that are a concern for society.

The scientific observation method and information collection techniques applied during the fieldwork revealed that most of the tourism managers surveyed recognise the potential of sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas as a viable solution for diversifying economic income, thereby reducing poverty and improving the living conditions of the community. They agree that it benefits families and the local community from a social point of view by raising environmental awareness, promoting soil, water, and biodiversity conservation, and sustaining resources in a community-based and participatory manner that favours proper resource management and recycling, energy efficiency, and the use of renewable sources.

The application of semantic differentiation to tourists revealed that most consider sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas to be a socio-economic solution that generates additional income for rural families, promotes employment, and provides social benefits for the community by promoting sustainable practices, environmental protection, the proper use of energy resources, and the use of renewable energy sources.

Tourism in the context of protected natural areas is characterised by the close link between tourist leisure and activities in rural environments and other agricultural work, as well as the notion of endogenous rural development to meet the demand for tourist resources, as conditions that allow for the sustainable tourism and the principles of the circular economy to be harmonised with the requirements established for protected natural areas, in the interest of achieving sustainable community development in rural areas, which seeks to meet visitors’ expectations through rewarding experiences, environmental protection, socio-economic benefits for host communities, and respect for the culture and traditions of the area, without leaving a negative footprint for future generations.

Sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas is capable of having a comprehensive and holistic synergistic effect on tourism activity, by integrating environmental protection and unforgettable life experiences, which enable the generation of a novel result that is superior from qualitative and quantitative points of view, reducing poverty and precarious living conditions in communities, creating better conditions for the environmental preservation of the protected area, and contributing to the fulfilment of the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda.

The relevance of this research lies in the nature of its results, which allow for the assessment of sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas as a scientific and innovative alternative that enables the diversification of economic income for producers, reduces poverty, guarantees greater job opportunities, and reduces precariousness in the territory by creating better conditions that favour compliance with established environmental protection measures and regulations.

This research seeks to reopen the scientific debate and transfer knowledge on the relevance of sustainable tourism in the context of protected natural areas, which, due to environmental regulations, are limited in their ability to undertake other forms of tourism that would allow them to diversify their sources of income, generate jobs, improve living conditions, and contribute to the sustainable development of rural communities.

Among the main limitations are the lack of a global consensus on the definition of sustainable tourism; the lack of continuous scientific monitoring, with most research based on short-term data, which does not allow for the determination of the effects of tourism on impacts that may take several years to manifest, such as trail erosion or microplastic pollution; academic approaches that are disconnected from reality, motivated by poor consultation with community stakeholders on the concept of sustainable tourism; studies that ignore cultural, ecological, and legal differences, offering results based on generalisations that are disconnected from the objective reality of each territory. Therefore, the proposed methodology aims to adopt integrated frameworks by combining ecological, social and economic indicators with the use of the Tourism Benefits and Impacts Measurement (MBPI) method; to encourage longitudinal studies and continuous scientific monitoring; the involvement of tourists and local actors in the collection of sensitive data and information; and the organisation of workshops with community participation on criteria associated with sustainability.

It is considered useful to continue in-depth research aimed at improving the methodology for studying tourism sustainability in protected natural areas and, at the same time, to continue the debate on sustainable tourism, based on new experiences that allow for a more complete and specific analysis of the socio-economic, environmental, governance and examples of good practices for achieving appropriate synergies in the community environment that favour the endogenous development of sustainable tourism in host communities.

Developing future research that delves deeper into innovation and the role of the technological revolution in sustainable tourism projects is a challenge for moving towards smart tourist destinations in the context of protected natural areas.