Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Coupling Coordination Among China’s Digital Economy, Carbon Emissions Efficiency, and High-Quality Economic Development
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Urban Resilience: Integrating Actions for Resilience (A4R) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Sustainable Urban Development and Proactive Hazard Mitigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Type of Self-Driving Vehicle Do Citizens Imagine? Results of a Co-Creation Dialogue Across Five European Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility

by
Leonardo Caggiani
and
Luigi Pio Prencipe
*
Department of Civil, Environmental, Land, Building Engineering and Chemistry (DICATECh), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona, 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6409; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146409
Submission received: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 13 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility)

1. Introduction

The global effort toward sustainable development has underscored the urgent need to transform urban mobility and transportation systems. These networks are essential to the vitality and functionality of modern cities, but they also present significant challenges related to environmental degradation, resource consumption, social equity, and public safety [1]. As urban populations grow and cities expand, there is an increasing need to switch to more sustainable, efficient, and resilient transportation systems. This is a key part of the UN’s 2030 Agenda initiative [2]. This highlights the need for a comprehensive strategy that supports technological advancements, reevaluates existing infrastructure, optimizes logistics, and promotes a deeper understanding of users’ behavior and social aspirations. The compendium of research presented in this Special Issue offers a panoramic exploration of these interconnected themes, providing a critical perspective on current advancements and the upcoming challenges in the pursuit of sustainable transportation. Achieving this sustainable shift is a complex task that requires more than just the advent of new technologies. It calls for a paradigm shift in how we plan urban spaces, integrate various transport modes, and encourage behavioral change [3]. Scenarios and robust indicator frameworks are indispensable tools in this journey, aiding in the deconstruction of real-world intricacies and the formulation of evidence-based policies. Therefore, it is crucial for academics and practitioners to constantly and critically evaluate these instruments to ensure they remain effective and relevant in shaping our urban futures. This collection of papers bravely enters this arena, offering diverse perspectives and critical insights.

2. Synopsis of Contributions

The foundation of effective mobility planning often requires an understanding of the complex relationship between urban form and movement patterns. De Vincentis et al. (2022) (Contribution 1) highlighted this with a data-driven analysis of mobility and the built environment across three Italian cities: Brescia, Catania, and Salerno. They utilized floating car data (FCD) and census information to map accessibility metrics, illustrating the effects of different urban layouts and street network characteristics on traffic flow, travel efficiency, and the daily experiences of urban residents. These insights are crucial for developing integrated transportation and land use strategies.
Through a bibliometric analysis of 2000 articles from 2018 to 2023, İnce (2025) (contribution 2) systematically mapped the emerging trends and innovative solutions in sustainable urban mobility. This comprehensive review identified dominant themes, such as smart mobility and technology integration, and highlighted emerging research advances, including the crucial links between transportation, public health, and urban walkability. The importance of sustainable modes of transportation, such as cycling, cannot be overstated. Ahmed et al. (2024) (Contribution 3) conducted a systematic review of bicycle infrastructure design principles within urban bikeability indices. They critically assessed whether current indices adequately incorporate the five core principles of safety, comfort, attractiveness, directness, and coherence. They found that, although bicycle infrastructure is a common evaluative component, the principle of “coherence” is often the least considered. This points to a vital area for improvement in planning truly bicycle-friendly cities.
The evolution of cities is coupled with the progress of the technological landscape of transportation, particularly with the rise of electromobility. The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) raises questions about infrastructure and the economy. Alrubaie et al. (2023) (Contribution 4) offered a comprehensive review of EV charging stations integrated with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. They considered market dynamics, technical specifications, grid implications, and future challenges. They concluded that PV-grid charging holds promise for profitability and reduced carbon footprints. However, its cost-effectiveness can be constrained by PV and battery capacities, as well as the inherent intermittency of solar power. In addition, Bozhi et al. (2023) (Contribution 5) explored the new realm of wireless pavement systems based on inductive power transfer (IPT) for electric vehicles (EVs). The authors investigated the key parameters affecting pavement inductivity and conductivity, including IPT pad materials and coil dimensions. Their work highlights the significance of balancing power transfer efficiency with pavement durability through optimized geometry and material science.
The financial viability and public acceptance of such advanced charging infrastructure were further explored by Kim et al. (2023) (Contribution 6). They investigated South Korean households’ willingness to pay for interactive charging stations facilitating vehicle-to-grid (V2G) systems. Their survey of 1000 respondents revealed that most households were willing to financially support V2G infrastructure, an initiative that holds promises in improving grid stability by using EVs as distributed energy storage, which is essential for integrating various renewable energy sources and promoting electric vehicle-sharing solutions [4].
Beyond electrification, the rise of autonomous and shared mobility services is poised to transform urban transit. However, their success depends significantly on user perception and acceptance. Kashani et al. (2023) (Contribution 7) investigated parents’ opinions in Kerman, Iran, considering shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) for their children’s school travel. Their findings revealed a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors, past travel experiences, and psychological factors such as perceived usefulness, environmental concerns, and safety assurances, including the ability to monitor their children. Viejo et al. (2025) (Contribution 8) focused on how novel transportation systems will address various needs. In their study, 147 citizens from five European countries engaged in a co-creation dialogue, and the results revealed a collective vision for the future of autonomous mobility: electric or hydrogen-powered vehicles that significantly rely on shared services, such as autonomous buses and e-hailing pods, rather than private vehicle ownership.
The implications of transportation trends need to extend to regional development and global logistics networks. Letnik et al. (2024) (Contribution 9) offered a forward-looking perspective from the business sector on the impact of transportation trends on sustainability in the Western Balkans. Their survey of transportation and logistics experts suggests that, although trends such as alternative fuels and smart city initiatives will likely reduce emissions and accidents, these trends will also pose economic challenges due to increased operational costs and the need for significant infrastructure investments. On a broader scale, Madanat et al. (2024) (Contribution 10) examined the drivers of port competitiveness in low-, upper-, and high-income countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Their structural equation modeling revealed that, while national competitiveness and ease of doing business generally bolster port competitiveness, the dynamics can differ significantly with income levels. For instance, increased national competitiveness in low-income countries might divert resources from port development, thereby diminishing their maritime competitiveness if not managed strategically.

3. Sustainable Mobility Challenges: Future Trends

This collection of diverse contributions depicts a sector that is facing a profound transition. It is a field that is technologically innovative yet faces significant socioeconomic and environmental challenges. As we navigate this evolving landscape, the critical assessments, innovative proposals, and forward-thinking perspectives offered by these researchers are key to guiding us toward sustainable, resilient, equitable, inclusive, and life-enhancing transportation systems for all urban communities. Recent comprehensive reviews confirm this collective shift, highlighting critical areas ranging from modeling post-pandemic travel behavior to the realization of “X-minute” cities [5]. Nevertheless, a well-defined and definitive plan is yet to materialize.
The forthcoming era of mobility will be characterized by several interconnected and challenging frontiers. A primary challenge remains: the persistent disparity between planning and implementation. Although strategic plans such as sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) exist, they consistently encounter political, financial, and institutional hurdles in the real world. Even leading examples of best practice, e.g., Copenhagen, illustrate that translating strategy into practice is an ongoing process of negotiation and adaptation. This emphasizes that even the most brilliant plan depends on its execution [6]. This implementation gap is intrinsically linked to a frequently underestimated factor: the human workforce. The transition to a digitized, sustainable transportation sector requires a parallel evolution in skills and competencies. Demographic, cultural, and socioeconomic shifts are fundamentally reshaping transportation jobs. This requires a proactive strategy for workforce development to ensure the necessary human capital for future mobility systems [7]. The digital revolution is reshaping not only how people move but also the flow of goods within urban areas. The disruptive technologies transforming passenger transport are also evident in the freight sector, where digitalization and automation ensure a redefinition of logistics, from last-mile delivery to urban consolidation centers. Therefore, a truly sustainable urban system must address the symbiotic association between personal mobility and freight transportation as an integrated whole [8]. Navigating the immense complexity of policy execution, human capital, and the convergence of passenger and freight logistics requires a new approach. The increasing dependence on simulation, optimization, and machine learning cannot be considered simply an academic pursuit; it is essential for designing, testing, and managing resilient and adaptive transportation systems in a world filled with uncertainty [9]. However, one of the most defining challenges is the inherent uncertainty about the future. The evolution of transformative concepts such as mobility as a service (MaaS) is not predetermined but contested, with multiple plausible futures ranging from closed “mobility walled gardens” dominated by a few large platforms to more open and collaborative ecosystems. Thus, exploring these potential futures through co-design and scenario-planning methodologies becomes a vital strategic imperative. These methodologies empower stakeholders to anticipate challenges and collaboratively shape desirable outcomes rather than merely reacting to change [10].
Collectively, the contributions presented in this Special Issue serve as milestone reference points, underscoring the fact that the objective is not solely the efficient and clean transportation of people and goods. The real task is to facilitate a complex, systemic transition that is technologically innovative, politically viable, and, above all, socially just. The objective is to shape urban environments that are not only smarter but also wiser, more equitable, and more profoundly human.

Author Contributions

L.C. and L.P.P. contributed to every part of the research described in this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who contributed to this Special Issue for their professional work. We are grateful to the reviewers, whose critical support and valuable comments have significantly improved the quality of the collection. Special thanks are granted to the Editorial Assistance Office of MDPI for their support throughout the review and publication process of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • De Vincentis, R.; Karagulian, F.; Liberto, C.; Nigro, M.; Rosati, V.; Valenti, G. A Data-Driven Approach to Analyze Mobility Patterns and the Built Environment: Evidence from Brescia, Catania, and Salerno (Italy). Sustainability 2022, 14, 14378.
  • İnce, E.C. Mapping the Path to Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends and Innovations in Transportation Research. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1480.
  • Ahmed, T.; Pirdavani, A.; Wets, G.; Janssens, D. Bicycle Infrastructure Design Principles in Urban Bikeability Indices: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2545.
  • Alrubaie, A.J.; Salem, M.; Yahya, K.; Mohamed, M.; Kamarol, M. A Comprehensive Review of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations with Solar Photovoltaic System Considering Market, Technical Requirements, Network Implications, and Future Challenges. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8122.
  • Bozhi; Mohamed, M.; Gilani, V.N.M.; Amjad, A.; Majid, M.S.; Yahya, K.; Salem, M. A Review of Wireless Pavement System Based on the Inductive Power Transfer in Electric Vehicles. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14893.
  • Kim, J.-H.; Hyun, M.-K.; Yoo, S.-H. Households’ Willingness to Pay for Interactive Charging Stations for Vehicle to Grid System in South Korea. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11563.
  • Kashani, M.A.; Kamyab, S.; Mamdoohi, A.R.; Sierpiński, G. What Makes Parents Consider Shared Autonomous Vehicles as a School Travel Mode? Sustainability 2023, 15, 16180.
  • Viejo, J.; Quijano, A.; Farrow, L.; Papanelopoulou, S. What Type of Self-Driving Vehicle Do Citizens Imagine? Results of a Co-Creation Dialogue Across Five European Countries. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3561.
  • Letnik, T.; Hanžič, K.; Mencinger, M.; Sever, D. Impact of Transport Trends on Sustainability in the Western Balkans: A Future-Oriented Business Sector Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16, 272.
  • Mdanat, M.F.; Al Hur, M.; Bwaliez, O.M.; Samawi, G.A.; Khasawneh, R. Drivers of Port Competitiveness Among Low-, Upper-, and High-Income Countries. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11198.

References

  1. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Green Deal; COM (2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640 (accessed on 10 June 2025).
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. In Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Slade, R., Al Khourdajie, A., van Diemen, R., McCollum, D., Pathak, M., Some, S., Vyas, P., Fradera, R., et al., Eds.; Chapter 10: Transport; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/ (accessed on 10 June 2025).
  3. Creutzig, F.; Niamir, L.; Bai, X.; Callaghan, M.; Cullen, J.; Díaz-José, J.; Figueroa, M.; Grubler, A.; Lamb, W.F.; Leip, A.; et al. Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prencipe, L.P.; van Essen, J.T.; Caggiani, L.; Ottomanelli, M.; de Almeida Correia, G.H. A Mathematical Programming Model for Optimal Fleet Management of Electric Car-Sharing Systems with Vehicle-to-Grid Operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 368, 133147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.M. The Landscape, Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities of Sustainable Mobility and Transport. Npj Sustain. Mobil. Transp. 2025, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peters, N.V.; Reisch, L.A. Drivers of and Barriers to Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan Implementation: Lessons from Copenhagen. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2025, 20, 101417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pomoni, M.; Laiou, A.; Plati, C.; Yannis, G.; Loukea, M.; Bekiaris, E. Future Trends in Transport Workforce Based on Demographic, Behavioural, Cultural and Socioeconomic Factors. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 48, 2811–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, C.; Akram, A.; Andersson, D.; Arnäs, P.O.; Stefansson, G. The Impact of Emerging and Disruptive Technologies on Freight Transportation in the Digital Era: Current State and Future Trends. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 32, 386–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de la Torre, R.; Corlu, C.G.; Faulin, J.; Onggo, B.S.; Juan, A.A. Simulation, Optimization, and Machine Learning in Sustainable Transportation Systems: Models and Applications. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Caiati, V.; Rasouli, S.; López, H. Exploring the Future of Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A Co-Design Approach to Scenario Planning in European Cities. J. Urban Mobil. 2025, 8, 100133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caggiani, L.; Prencipe, L.P. Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146409

AMA Style

Caggiani L, Prencipe LP. Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility. Sustainability. 2025; 17(14):6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caggiani, Leonardo, and Luigi Pio Prencipe. 2025. "Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility" Sustainability 17, no. 14: 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146409

APA Style

Caggiani, L., & Prencipe, L. P. (2025). Development Trends of Sustainable Mobility. Sustainability, 17(14), 6409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop