Next Article in Journal
Digital Transformation and Ambidextrous Innovation for Sustainable Growth: Evidence from Listed Tourism Firms in China
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal and Spatial Analysis of the Environmental State of the Valencia Plain Aquifer Area Using the Weighted Environmental Index (WEI)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation

by
Prabhaharan Renganathan
1,
Marcia Astorga-Eló
2,
Lira A. Gaysina
1,3,
Edgar Omar Rueda Puente
4,* and
Juan Carlos Sainz-Hernández
5,*
1
Department of Bioecology and Biological Education, M. Akmullah Bashkir State Pedagogical University, 450000 Ufa, Russia
2
Grupo de Investigación en Alimentación y Nutrición Humana, Carrera de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4780000, Chile
3
All-Russian Research Institute of Phytopathology, 143050 Bolshye Vyazemy, Russia
4
Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería, Universidad de Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, Mexico
5
Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional Unidad Sinaloa, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Guasave 81049, Sinaloa, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5922; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135922
Submission received: 25 May 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture and food security are challenged by the indiscriminate use of synthetic nitrogen (N2) fertilizers, inefficient water management, and land degradation. Hydroponic cultivation uses nutrient-rich aqueous media and is a climate-resilient and resource-efficient alternative to traditional farming methods, whose dependence on synthetic N2 fertilizers reduces their long-term sustainability. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which is mediated by diazotrophs that reduce atmospheric N2 to plant-available ammonium, has emerged as a sustainable alternative to synthetic N2 input in hydroponic systems. This review discusses the integration of BNF into hydroponic systems by exploring the functional diversity of diazotrophs, root–microbe interactions, and environmental constraints. It further highlights recent advances in strain improvement, microbial consortia development, nitrogenase protection, and genome editing tools, novel bioformulation strategies to enhance microbial compatibility with hydroponic nutrient regimes, and omics-based tools for the real-time assessment of N2 fixation and microbial functionality. Key challenges, such as microbial leaching, nitrate-induced inhibition of nitrogenase activity, and the absence of standardized biostimulant protocols, are discussed. Case studies on staple crops have demonstrated enhanced NUE and yield productivity following diazotroph applications. This review concludes with future perspectives on synthetic biology, regulatory policies, and omics-based tools for the real-time assessment of N2 fixation and microbial functionality.

1. Introduction

Global agriculture is facing increasing pressure due to rapid population growth, urbanization, and climate change. According to the United Nations, the global population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, with a significant increase in food demand [1,2]. Currently, 55% of the global population resides in urban areas, which is expected to exceed 75% by 2050, indicating the need for highly efficient agricultural systems in urban and peri-urban zones [3]. Agricultural productivity is declining due to land degradation, soil infertility, water scarcity, and climate variation [4]. Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, nutrient imbalance, and extreme temperatures can reduce staple crop yields by up to 23% annually [3].
Controlled Environmental Agriculture, particularly hydroponic agriculture, has emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming. Hydroponics is a soilless cultivation method that supplies nutrients directly to plant roots, reducing dependence on arable land and irrigation water, while enabling year-round crop production [3,5]. The global hydroponics market was valued at approximately USD 9.8 billion in 2022 and is expected to increase owing to technological development and food production demands in urban areas [6]. However, most hydroponic systems rely on synthetic N2 fertilizers derived from the energy-intensive Haber–Bosch process, contributing to over 80% of anthropogenic reactive N2 emissions [7]. Improper N2 management leads to nutrient accumulation, nitrate (NO3) toxicity, and environmental contamination [8].
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is a sustainable alternative to synthetic N2 fertilizers. Diazotrophic microorganisms, such as Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Rhizobium, and N2-fixing cyanobacteria convert atmospheric N2 into bioavailable ammonia for plant uptake, enhancing N2 availability and promoting nutrient use efficiency (NUE) in plants [9]. Although BNF has been studied in soil and rhizosphere systems, emerging evidence suggests that the incorporation of diazotrophic microorganisms has shown promising adaptability in hydroponic environments. They exhibit a range of nitrogen-fixing strategies, such as root colonization, biofilm formation, and nitrogenase protection mechanisms, which enhance nitrogen acquisition and plant growth in hydroponic systems [10,11,12]. However, their effectiveness is inhibited by several physiological, chemical, and ecological constraints, including microbial compatibility with host crops, nutrient solution composition, and system-specific abiotic conditions [13]. To address these limitations, recent research has focused on microbial consortium design, diazotroph strain engineering, and the use of protective bioformulations [14,15]. Ongoing advances in imaging, transcriptomics, and formulation technologies are enhancing our understanding of microbial interactions and facilitating their effective integration into precision hydroponic systems [16,17]. Moreover, regulatory and policy frameworks are being developed to define the safety and efficacy standards for microbial bioinputs in controlled environments [18,19].
This review discusses the following: (i) The potential of integrating diazotrophic microorganisms into hydroponics, focusing on their diversity, functionality, and root interactions under hydroponic conditions. (ii) Recent advancements in identifying potential diazotrophic strains, developing synthetic and native consortia, and strategies to protect nitrogenase enzymes from oxidative and NO3-induced stress. (iii) Novel bioformulation strategies, such as alginate-based encapsulation, nanocellulose carriers, and co-inoculation techniques, to enhance stability and compatibility with hydroponic nutrient solutions. (iv) Omics-based tools, including metagenomics, transcriptomics, and biosensor technologies, for the real-time monitoring of N2 fixation efficiency. (v) Key challenges, such as microbial leaching in recirculating systems, NO3-induced inhibition of nitrogenase, and the absence of standardized protocols for bioinoculant applications. (vi) Case studies on the integration of diazotrophic microorganisms into hydroponic crops have shown improved NUE and crop productivity. (vii) Future research directions include synthetic biology approaches to nitrogenase engineering, development of regulatory guidelines, and the emerging role of AI-assisted nutrient management tools as potential enablers for enhancing the integration of BNF into hydroponic agriculture. These strategies aim to enhance the transition from synthetic N2 to microbe-based nutrient solutions in hydroponic farming.

2. Nitrogen Dynamics in Hydroponic Systems

2.1. Forms and Functions of Nitrogen in Hydroponics

Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient that plays a crucial role in various physiological and biochemical processes involved in plant growth and development. It constitutes the backbone of vital biomolecules, such as DNA, proteins, amino acids, chlorophyll, and phytohormones [20]. Plants absorb N from nutrient solutions in the form of NO3 and ammonium (NH4+). Under certain conditions, plants absorb organic N2 compounds, such as amino acids, peptides, and urea, especially when they are abundant in the root zone or during specific physiological or stress conditions [21]. NO3 is the preferred form because of its high mobility in nutrient solutions, low phytotoxicity, and compatibility with oxygenated root systems [13].
Under well-aerated hydroponic conditions, NO3 contributed up to 90% of the total N uptake. The uptake and utilization of NH4+ depend on factors such as plant genotype, temperature, pH, and the ionic composition of the nutrient solution [13]. Although NH4+ requires less energy for plant assimilation than NO3, excess NH4+ can cause rhizotoxicity, disrupt ion homeostasis, and induce oxidative stress in plant tissues [22]. NH4+ accumulation leads to rhizosphere acidification, which affects the uptake of essential cations such as calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+). Maintaining an optimal NO3:NH4+ ratio is essential for plant health in hydroponics and should be optimized for specific crops and growth conditions. A 25:75 NH4+:NO3 ratio enhanced Chinese kale growth without inducing NH4+ toxicity [23]. The form of N supplied influences plant traits, including root architecture, secondary metabolism, and antioxidant enzyme activity [24]. While synthetic nutrient formulations allow for precise control of nitrogen inputs, they often create conditions that suppress the functional expression of microbial nitrogenase. Comparative studies evaluating how different N sources influence diazotroph activity in hydroponics remain limited, highlighting a gap in understanding nitrogen–microbe–plant interactions in soilless environments.

2.2. N Uptake and Assimilation

In hydroponically cultivated crops, N uptake occurs through membrane-bound transporter proteins and assimilatory enzymes. Primary inorganic N sources (NO3 and NH4+) are transported into plant cells through nitrate transporters (NRTs) and ammonium transporter protein families [13,25]. The NRT gene family includes low-affinity (NRT1) and high-affinity (NRT2) transporters that function at distinct external NO3 concentrations. NRT1 proteins function under various NO3 concentrations and are regulated by phosphorylation to adapt to nutrient availability. NRT2 is activated under NO3-limited conditions and has a high substrate specificity [25].
When NO3 enters the cell, it undergoes a two-step reduction process prior to assimilation. Nitrate reductase (NR) catalyzes the conversion of NO3 to nitrite (NO2) in the cytosol, which then moves to plastids, where nitrite reductase (NiR) reduces it to NH4+ (Figure 1). NH4+ or NH4+ absorbed from the nutrient solution enters assimilation via the glutamine synthetase (GS)–glutamate synthase (GOGAT) pathway. GS catalyzes the ATP-dependent amination of glutamate (Glu) with NH4+ to glutamine (Gln), which GOAT converts back to Glu using 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG), thereby forming the central NH4+ assimilation pathway [21]. The GS–GOGAT cycle incorporates inorganic N into organic amino acids, thereby enhancing biomass accumulation and metabolic homeostasis.
Other key enzymes also regulate the N metabolism. (i) Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) catalyzes the reversible amination of 2-OG to Glu under stress or when NH4+ is abundant. (ii) Asparagine synthetase (ASN) converts Gln to aspartate (Asp) or NH4+ to asparagine (Asn) for N storage. (iii) Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase converts bicarbonate (HCO3) and NH4+ to carbamoyl phosphate for pyrimidine and arginine biosynthesis [21]. These reactions facilitate N2 assimilation and integration with metabolic pathways to regulate the growth and stress responses in hydroponic systems.

2.3. NUE in Hydroponics

NUE is an important agronomic trait in hydroponic cultivation that influences nutrient management, crop yield, and environmental sustainability. NUE indicates the plant’s absorption, assimilation, and utilization of N for biomass or yield production. Optimizing NUE is essential in hydroponic systems to reduce N loss and fertilizer costs [26].
Several strategies have been employed to enhance NUE in hydroponics, including genotype selection, nutrient optimization, and biostimulants. Studies on lettuce grown using the nutrient film technique (NFT) reported that NUE increased at NO3 concentrations of 100–150 mg L−1, whereas higher NO3 supplementation decreased NUE and increased N leaching [26]. Similarly, reducing NO3 concentration from 7.5 mM to 1.0 mM during tuber initiation increased NUE without reducing hydroponic potato yield [27].
Genotypic variation plays a crucial role in optimizing NUE. Spinach varieties with distinct growth rates have shown differential N uptake kinetics and N2-assimilation efficiencies, based on root morphology and associated enzyme activities [28]. Hybrid “super rice” lines bred for enhanced root architecture have shown higher NH4+ acquisition and improved NUE under hydroponic conditions [29].
Physiological strategies have shown promising results in improving NUE. Grafting watermelons onto bottle gourd rootstocks enhances root system architecture, NO3 uptake, and stress tolerance under N-limited conditions [20]. Biostimulants, such as legume protein hydrolysates, effectively enhance the N2-assimilation efficiency. Foliar application of these biostimulants to leafy vegetables enhances N metabolism enzymes and antioxidant defense mechanisms, improving NUE in hydroponically grown plants [30].

2.4. Environmental Impact of N Leaching in Hydroponic Discharge Water

Open and semi-closed hydroponic systems generate nutrient-rich discharge water that contains high concentrations of N and other macronutrients. When released untreated, they pose ecological risks, including eutrophication, groundwater contamination, and greenhouse gas emissions [3,31]. Korean hydroponic farms reported total N concentrations in discharge effluents ranging from 48 to 494 mg L−1, exceeding the national safety limit of 40.0 mg L−1 [32]. Similarly, effluents from acyclic hydroponic systems contain N concentrations above 400 mg L−1, potentially contaminating the surface and groundwater ecosystems [33].
In addition to water pollution, NO3 and NH4+ accumulation in the rhizosphere promotes anaerobic microbial activity, causing denitrification and nitrous oxide release, which is a greenhouse gas with a 300-fold greater global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2) [34]. Several remediation strategies have been explored to mitigate these effects. Sequencing Batch Reactors have achieved >89.5% NO3 removal efficiency, providing effective bioremediation of nutrient-rich effluents [32]. Algal–bacterial bioreactors have emerged as promising systems for nutrient removal and value-added biomass production for feed, biofertilizer, and bioenergy applications [10].
The transition to closed-loop hydroponic systems is essential for ensuring environmental sustainability. In the Netherlands, greenhouse growers must eliminate nutrient discharge by 2027, leading to the widespread adoption of advanced real-time nutrient sensors, automated fertigation controls, and nutrient recovery platforms [35].

3. BNF: Principles and Diazotrophic Microorganisms

3.1. Overview of Nitrogenase Enzyme and Energy Requirements

BNF is an enzymatic process in which diazotrophic microorganisms convert N2 into NH4+, providing plants with bioavailable N for cellular metabolism, protein synthesis, and biomass accumulation [9]. Although lightning, fossil fuel combustion, and industrial N2 fixation through the Haber–Bosch process contribute to the global N cycle, diazotroph-mediated BNF remains the predominant biological pathway for NH3 production in ecosystems [36]. Living organisms depend on BNF to synthesize essential biomolecules, including nucleic acids, proteins, amino acids, and chlorophyll, which are fundamental for growth and metabolism [9].
The stoichiometric reaction catalyzed by the nitrogenase enzyme complex is as follows:
N 2 + 8 H + + 8 e + 16 A T P 2 N H 3 + H 2 + 16 A D P + 16 P i
Nitrogenase-mediated N reduction requires a high ATP input. Approximately 16 ATP molecules are hydrolyzed per N2 molecule reduced to NH3, and 12 ATP equivalents are required for NH4+ assimilation, translocation, and incorporation into organic nitrogenous compounds. The total energy cost is approximately 28 ATP molecules per reduced N2 molecule. Despite this high energy demand, BNF remains more sustainable than the Haber–Bosch process. To contextualize sustainability, we incorporated a techno-economic comparison between industrial Haber–Bosch and BNF. Industrial Haber–Bosch ammonia costs USD 160–500 t−1, with smaller plants and increased energy or transport factors edging costs above USD 500 t−1; energy demands are approximately 28–32 GJ t−1 NH3 (~40 MJ kg−1 N−1) and emissions are ~1 t CO2 t−1 NH3 [37,38]. In contrast, BNF requires ~16 MJ kg−1 N−1 or ~4.1 g C g−1 N−1 fixed [39].
BNF is thermodynamically exothermic (ΔH° = −45.2 KJ mol−1 NH3), but kinetically limited due to its high activation energy (~420 KJ mol−1). To overcome this, nitrogenase enzymes couple ATP hydrolysis with electron donation from redox carriers such as ferredoxin or flavodoxin. Studies have used chemical reductants, such as dithionite, to simulate the reaction environment [40].
The nitrogenase enzyme complex consists of two metalloproteins: dinitrogenase reductase (Fe protein) and dinitrogenase (MoFe protein). The Fe protein encoded by nifH transfers electrons to the MoFe protein encoded by nifD and nifK [9]. Nitrogenases are classified into three types based on the metal cofactors at the active site: molybdenum (Mo)-dependent (FeMo-co), vanadium (V)-dependent (FeV-co), and iron-only (FeFe-co). Each variant has unique catalytic properties, with FeMo-Co being the most common and efficient under natural conditions [36].
The major biochemical limitation of nitrogenases is their extreme sensitivity to oxygen. Molecular oxygen irreversibly oxidizes and deactivates the metal clusters at the active site. Diazotrophs possess diverse protective mechanisms against environmental stressors. Unicellular cyanobacteria, such as Cyanothece, conduct BNF exclusively at night, separating nitrogenase activity from oxygenic photosynthesis [11]. Obligate aerobes, such as Azotobacter spp., use “respiratory protection,” maintaining high respiration rates to reduce intracellular oxygen levels [41]. Filamentous heterocystous cyanobacteria, including Anabaena and Nostoc, form specialized thick-walled heterocysts that isolate nitrogenase from the oxygen produced during photosynthesis [42]. Additional mechanisms include oxygen-scavenging proteins (e.g., FeSII), extracellular polysaccharide layers as oxygen diffusion barriers, and microaerobic growth in biofilms and root nodules [43].
From an agroecological perspective, symbiotic N2 fixation requires significant carbon input from the host plants. The microbial fixation of 1 g of N2 requires approximately 12 g of glucose [36]. However, in hydroponic systems, BNF is a renewable, low-emission strategy for N2 input that promotes circular bioeconomy principles and reduces dependence on synthetic N2 fertilizers.

3.2. Plant–Microbe Symbiosis in BNF

Diazotrophic microorganisms comprise diverse prokaryotes, including taxa from the classes Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria, and the phyla Cyanobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria [40]. Based on their interactions with host plants, diazotrophs are categorized into three functional groups: rhizosphere, endophytic, and symbiotic groups [44]. Each group exhibits distinct colonization strategies, N2 fixation efficiencies, and host preferences. The estimated N2 fixation rates of various diazotrophs are summarized in Table 1.

3.2.1. Rhizospheric and Endophytic Diazotrophs

Rhizospheric diazotrophs are free-living or associative N2-fixing bacteria that inhabit the root–soil interface, also known as the rhizosphere. This microenvironment is influenced by root exudates, including sugars, amino acids, and organic acids, which are chemoattractants that provide energy for microbial colonization [40]. These microorganisms are plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that promote plant growth through N2 fixation, phosphate (P) solubilization, siderophore production, and phytohormone synthesis [50].
In contrast, endophytic diazotrophs colonize internal plant tissues, including cortical cells, intercellular spaces, xylem, and phloem, without causing disease symptoms [51]. Endophytes have ecological advantages, including reduced competition, access to host-derived metabolites, and enhanced N transfer, owing to their association with plant vascular tissues [44]. Several genera, including Herbaspirillum, Gluconacetobacter, Burkholderia, Azoarcus, and Azospirillum, have been isolated from cereals, such as rice, maize, sorghum, and wheat [51,52]. Herbaspirillum seropedicae and Burkholderia vietnamiensis colonize the intercellular spaces in sugarcane tissues and enhance N2 fixation under fertilizer-limited conditions [44]. A. brasilense, a facultative endophyte, exhibits chemotaxis towards root exudates and utilizes “respiratory protection” by increasing oxygen consumption to protect nitrogenase from oxidative inactivation [53].
Transcriptomic and metabolomic studies have shown that endophytic colonization enhances the expression of host plant genes associated with N2 assimilation, stress signaling, and root architecture [54]. Endophytes enhance tolerance to abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, and nutrient deficiency, by mediating signaling networks involving plant hormones (e.g., auxins and cytokinins), reactive oxygen species, and small RNAs [50].

3.2.2. Symbiotic Diazotrophs

Symbiotic N2 fixation occurs through mutualistic interactions between host plants and diazotrophic bacteria, forming root or stem nodules, where N2 fixation occurs under microaerobic conditions [55]. In these symbioses, the plant provides photosynthetically derived carbon compounds and a protected niche for bacterial survival and nitrogenase activity in the root nodules [10].
Symbiosis in leguminous plants occurs in the order Rhizobiales, including Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Ensifer, Mesorhizobium, and Azorhizobium [56]. Symbiotic signaling begins with root-exuded flavonoids, which act as chemoattractants and activate nod gene expression in bacteria. Nod-factor synthesis facilitates host recognition, initiates infection thread development, and promotes cortical cell division, leading to nodule organogenesis [55]. Although legumes are the main hosts of rhizobia, certain non-leguminous species, such as Parasponia andersoni, form nodules with Rhizobium spp., representing an intermediate stage between rhizobial and actinorhizal symbioses [57].
In non-leguminous plants, actinorhizal symbiosis involves filamentous actinobacteria of Frankia spp., which form N2-fixing nodules in woody angiosperms, such as Casuarina, Alnus, Myrica, Elaeagnus, and Hippophae [58]. Frankia-induced nodules contain vesicles that protect nitrogenase from oxygen and sporangia, which promotes microbial dissemination [59]. These symbioses facilitate afforestation, land reclamation, and ecological restoration in N2-deficient environments [60].

4. Plant Growth-Promoting Properties of Diazotrophs Beyond N2 Fixation

Recent advancements in plant–microbe interactions have shown that diazotrophic microorganisms have diverse plant growth-promoting properties, including phytohormone synthesis, nutrient solubilization, abiotic stress tolerance, phytopathogen inhibition, and enhancement of root architecture and rhizosphere microbial dynamics [3,31,50,61] (Table 2). These traits are exhibited under both controlled and field conditions, supporting the integration of diazotrophs into hydroponic systems [3].
Diazotrophs significantly contribute to the bioavailability of essential macro- and micronutrients, including phosphorus (P), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and potassium (K). Strains of A. brasilense, Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, Anabaena variabilis, and Tolypothrix synthesize organic acids, such as gluconic, citric, and oxalic acids, which chelate mineral ions from insoluble forms and promote plant root uptake [3,31,62,63,64,65,66]. Siderophore production, particularly by Azotobacter spp. and Herbaspirillum spp., enhances Fe acquisition under Fe-limiting conditions [67,68].
Endophytic diazotrophs, such as Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, enhance P solubilization and K mobilization in hydroponically grown crops [69]. For example, Ramos et al. [68] reported that H. seropedicae enhances Fe and Zn uptake in rice by stimulating root exudation and modulating phytohormone signaling pathways. Cyanobacteria, such as A. variabilis and Nostoc muscorum, contribute to nutrient acquisition and rhizosphere health by producing exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and siderophores (e.g., schizokinen), which chelate Fe3+ [70].
In addition to nutrient solubilization, many diazotrophs produce plant growth regulators, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins, cytokinins, and abscisic acid. A. brasilense has been studied for its IAA production, which stimulates lateral root formation, root hair elongation, and increased nutrient absorption, thereby enhancing root system architecture under hydroponic conditions [71]. Although these traits are commonly associated with plant growth promotion, their efficacy under hydroponic conditions can vary significantly depending on the plant species, microbial concentration, environmental conditions, and nutrient solution composition, with some studies reporting inconsistent or negligible responses to inoculation.
Diazotrophs also improve plant resilience to abiotic stress. Inoculation of hydroponic lettuce with Bacillus subtilis enhances chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, and drought tolerance [72]. Similarly, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens enhances salt tolerance by regulating Na+ transport, inducing osmolyte accumulation, and activating antioxidant defense enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase and catalase [73].
Recently, the biocontrol potential of diazotrophs has gained significant attention. A microbial consortium of Trichoderma harzianum, Streptomyces albus, and Azotobacter vinelandii inhibited Fusarium oxysporum in tomatoes and increased the fruit yield [74]. Endophytic Streptomyces spp. antagonize parasitic nematodes and foliar pathogens, while improving nutrient cycling [75]. A suspension of the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. exhibited antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi and oomycetes [61]. The formulated microbial consortia, with P-mobilizing and polysaccharide-degrading capabilities, restored fertility in hydroponic wastewater and in degraded soil. Genetically modified consortia in post-mining landscapes improve nutrient availability and plant establishment [14].
Table 2. Biostimulant mechanisms and observed plant benefits of diazotrophic and photosynthetic microbial inoculants.
Table 2. Biostimulant mechanisms and observed plant benefits of diazotrophic and photosynthetic microbial inoculants.
Microbial SpeciesHost PlantsBiostimulant MechanismsPlant BenefitsReferences
Bacterial Inoculants
Azospirillum brasilenseMaize, lettuce, common beanIAA, GA, CKs, P solubilization, antioxidant enzymes, and siderophore production Improved root/shoot growth and biomass, nutrient uptake (N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Zn), NUE, photosynthesis, abiotic stress tolerance[62,76,77]
Azotobacter chroococcumCotton, cucumber, tomato, cabbage, sugar beetIAA, GA, JA, ACC deaminase, P and K solubilization, siderophoreIncreased biomass, yield, leaf nutrients, photosynthesis, stress and disease resistance[63,67,78]
Rhizobium leguminosarumPea, common bean, soybean, peanut, chickpea, lentil, faba bean, cowpea, lupinIAA, CKs, P solubilizationImproved seedling growth, vigor, biomass, and yield, antioxidant activity, and secondary metabolites (phenols, flavonoids, tannins)[79,80,81]
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicusTomato, rice, Arabidopsis thalianaEndophytic colonization, N2 fixation, modulation of growth- and defense-related gene expressionIncreased plant height, fresh weight, leaf chlorophyll, yield under both N-rich and N-deficient conditions, and drought tolerance[82,83,84]
Herbaspirillum seropedicaePalm, riceEndophytic colonization; stimulation of vacuolar H+-ATPase and H+-PPase activity; N2 fixationEnhanced plant growth, nutrients (N, K, Ca, and Mg), photosynthesis[68,85]
Pseudomonas fluorescensSedum alfredii, okra, tomatoIAA, ACC deaminase, P solubilization, ISR, VOC, antibiotic and siderophore productionEnhanced biomass, leaf chlorophyll, Cd uptake, essential oil biosynthesis, drought tolerance[66,86,87]
Bacillus amyloliquefaciensMaize, soybean, tomatoIAA, GA, ABA, antibiotics (surfactin, bacillomycin D), VOCs (e.g., 2,3-butanediol), ACC deaminase, antifungal activityIncreased plant height, dry matter, yield, Fusarium and Alternaria inhibition, stress tolerance, and photosynthesis[64,65,88]
Cyanobacterial Inoculants
Nostoc muscorumBasil, garlic, barleyIAA, CKs, EPS, secondary metabolite secretion, antioxidant inductionFusarium oxysporum inhibition, increased leaf weight, essential oil yield, stress resilience, and biomass[89,90,91]
Anabaena variabilisBasil, rice, soybean, wheat, okra, millet, mungbeanIAA, GA, N2 fixation, P solubilization, siderophore, EPS, hydrolytic enzyme (e.g., chitosanase) productionEnhanced growth, yield, seed germination, and root architecture, and reduced Fusarium infection and oxidative stress[89,92,93]
Tolypothrix sp.Basil, tomato, barleyN2 fixation; phytohormone and organic acid secretion; defense enzyme and chitosanase production; antifungal activityImproved seed germination, plant height, and soil quality, and reduced soil-borne diseases[89,92]
Microalgal Inoculants
Chlorella vulgarisArabidopsis thaliana, common bean, cucumber, wheat, soybeanIAA, GAIncreased root/shoot biomass, flower number, antioxidant capacity, glucosinolate biosynthesis, drought resistance[94,95,96]
Scenedesmus quadricaudaLettuce, sugar beetActivation of C and N metabolism enzymes (GOGAT, GS, CS, MDH), PAL activity, phytohormone productionImproved chlorophyll, carotenoid, proteins, biomass, nutrient uptake, root architecture[97,98]
Arthrospira platensisRosemary, wheat, tomatoIAA, GA, CKs, antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GR, PPO), improved nutrient uptakeEnhanced growth parameters (height, root length, fresh/dry weight); increased essential oil content and photosynthetic pigment levels; improved stress tolerance under drought and salinity[99,100,101]
Abbreviations: IAA, indole acetic acid; GA, gibberellin; CKs, cytokinins; ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate; JA, jasmonic acid; ISR, induced systematic resistance; VOCs, volatile compounds; ABA, abscisic acid; EPS, exopolysaccharide; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; GS, glutamine synthetase; CS, citrate synthase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GR, glutathione reductase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase.

5. Evidence of Diazotrophs in Hydroponics: A Case Series

Recent research has demonstrated the integration of diazotrophic microorganisms into hydroponic systems, resulting in enhanced plant growth, nutrient assimilation, and reduced dependence on synthetic N2 fertilizers. Inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris with Rhizobium tropici under hydroponic conditions enhanced nodule formation from 4 to 80 nodules per plant, thereby increasing N2 assimilation [102]. Co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense reduced fertilizer input by 25% by enhancing nutrient uptake and enzyme activity in hydroponically grown arugula [103]. Co-cultivation with cyanobacteria, such as Synechococcus sp., Anabaena sp., Nostoc sp., Calothrix sp., Scytonema sp., and Cylindrospermum sp., has been shown to improve plant growth and nutrient uptake in hydroponic crops [3]. Diazotrophic endophytes and free-living microbes can enhance N2 acquisition in non-leguminous crops [104]. Inoculation of lettuce with A. brasilense strains AbV5 and AbV6 increased plant biomass, photosynthetic efficiency, and N2 assimilation, reducing the requirement for external N2 fertilizers in hydroponic systems [105]. Similarly, co-inoculation of hydroponically cultivated maize with A. brasilense and H. seropedicae enhanced N uptake, K and P accumulation, and shoot vigor [106].
Several studies have reported quantifiable yield benefits following diazotroph inoculation of hydroponic vegetable crops. Inoculation of tomatoes with endophytic bacteria, Azotobacter sp., Azospirillum sp., and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) resulted in an 8–9% increase in fruit yield compared with uninoculated controls [107]. In cherry tomatoes grown hydroponically under substrate culture, co-inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizal fungi produced 29–64% higher fruit weight per plant, with the significant gains observed at full nutrient concentrations [108]. In lettuce, the application of A. brasilense strains AbV5 and AbV6 increased leaf yield, fresh and dry biomass, nutrient assimilation, and photosynthetic parameters, with chlorophyll content up by 46%, net photosynthesis by 85%, and biomass by 40–60% compared to uninoculated plants [105]. In addition, basil grown in hydroponics with PGPR and mycorrhizal treatments achieved an exceptional 214% yield increase during the second harvest compared to the controls [109]. In our previous experiment, a comparative hydroponic cultivation trial using Knop nutrient solution was used to evaluate the effect of an authentic strain of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck on cucumber seedlings. Supplementation with Chlorella suspension led to a 25% increase in dry root biomass, rising from 0.04 g to 0.05 g. These results suggest enhanced nutrient allocation and potential biostimulant effects under hydroponic conditions (Figure 2) [110]. These data demonstrate that diazotrophic inoculation can consistently yield ~10–200% increases in vegetable yield under hydroponic conditions.
Symbiotic diazotrophs, such as R. tropici and R. sophoriradicis, exhibit effective root nodulation and N2 fixation in hydroponically grown common beans, resulting in increased pod numbers, tissue N content, and yield [111]. Cyanobacterial diazotrophs, such as N. muscorum and A. variabilis, have received attention for their functional roles in N2 fixation and plant growth promotion. The incorporation of Nostoc spp. into spinach hydroponics improved ascorbic acid content by 0.37-fold, antioxidant capacity by 0.36-fold, and β-carotene levels, thereby enhancing the yield and nutritional quality [112]. Similarly, the supplementation of hydroponically grown cucumbers with Anabaena spp. improves lateral root development, increases N uptake, and enhances NUE [3].
The survival and functionality of diazotrophic microorganisms in hydroponic systems depends on their physiological and biochemical adaptations. One of the main challenges in integrating diazotrophs into hydroponic systems is the conflicting oxygen requirement; while plant roots demand high DO levels for aerobic respiration, nitrogenase is highly sensitive to oxygen and requires microaerobic conditions. Several strategies have been developed to overcome this issue. Obligate aerobes, such as A. vinelandii utilize "respiratory protection" by increasing cellular oxygen consumption to protect nitrogenase from oxidative damage [113]. Similarly, heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria, such as Anabaena and Nostoc, physically compartmentalize nitrogenase within oxygen-impermeable cells [114]. Additionally, EPS-producing strains, such as A. brasilense and H. seropedicae, form a barrier that limits oxygen diffusion and enhances biofilm-based colonization [115,116]. Spatial segregation of diazotrophs within root-interfacing microzones or physical carriers (e.g., alginate beads and porous capsules) may allow local microaerobic niches to persist, even under oxygen-rich conditions. Such strategies hold promise for optimizing plant and microbial oxygen requirements in engineered hydroponic environments [117].
Endophytic diazotrophs, such as G. diazotrophicus, colonize the root cortical tissues and are involved in nutrient exchange. In hydroponic systems, these bacteria regulate quorum sensing and upregulate stress response genes in response to electrical conductivity (EC) and pH fluctuations, thereby contributing to microbial stability and plant resilience [82]. Recent advances in confocal laser scanning microscopy and metatranscriptomics have enabled the direct visualization and gene expression profiling of root colonization, demonstrating the importance of maintaining optimal carbon/nitrogen (C:N) ratios and oxygen availability for sustained microbial function [118]. The effective application of diazotrophs in hydroponic systems depends on their nitrogenase activity, ecological compatibility with plant hosts, and nutrient requirements (Table 3). Despite promising evidence of diazotroph activity in hydroponic systems, the reproducibility of these outcomes across different setups remains unclear. Most existing studies have been limited to short-term trials in controlled environments, limiting real-time validation across different crops, nutrient recipes, and climatic setups. Variations in nutrient composition, aeration, and root architecture can significantly influence colonization efficiency and nitrogen fixation rates.

6. Strategies to Improve Diazotroph Performance in Hydroponics

6.1. Microbial Strain Selection and Engineering

Recent advances in microbial biotechnology have enhanced the isolation, characterization, and engineering of efficient diazotrophic strains for use in hydroponic systems. High-throughput screening platforms, such as droplet microfluidics, fluorescence-based reporter assays, and synthetic promoter libraries, have emerged as powerful tools for the rapid identification and optimization of microbial strains with high N2 fixation potential.
Droplet microfluidics enables the encapsulation of individual microbial cells within picoliter-scale droplets (typically 1 pL to 10 nL), allowing for the high-resolution screening of large microbial populations for nitrogenase activity. This approach enables the real-time evaluation of N2 fixation potential, thereby reducing the time and resources required for strain selection [127]. Agresti et al. [128] demonstrated that droplet-based screening of enzyme variants led to a 10-fold increase in catalytic activity compared to the host strain, validating its utility for diazotroph selection.
Fluorescence-based reporter assays facilitate the monitoring of nif gene expression using fluorescent protein reporters regulated by N-responsive promoters. This approach involves cell encapsulation with fluorogenic substrates, enabling the visual and quantitative identification of nitrogenase activity, where fluorescence intensity correlates with enzymatic function [129].
Synthetic promoter libraries have revolutionized the precision tuning of gene expression, particularly within nif gene clusters in diazotrophic bacteria. These libraries regulate N2 fixation activity based on host plant requirements and environmental conditions in hydroponic systems [130].
Genetic engineering approaches, including the targeted overexpression of nitrogenase structural genes (nifH, nifD, and nifK), have enhanced the N2-fixing capacity of engineered diazotrophs. The integration of nif genes from A. vinelandii into Escherichia coli resulted in a 10-fold increase in nitrogenase activity through the co-expression of electron transfer proteins, such as flavodoxin (fldA) and ferredoxin–NADP+ reductase (ydbK) [131].
To address nitrogenase oxygen sensitivity, which limits functionality in aerobic hydroponic systems, engineered strains include oxygen-scavenging enzymes, such as flavohemoglobins. These enzymes detoxify reactive oxygen and N species via NO dioxygenase activity, preserving nitrogenase activity under fluctuating oxygen levels [15].
Genome editing technologies, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, have enabled the insertion of N2 fixation operons into non-diazotrophic plant-associated bacterial and chassis strains, thereby advancing the development of next-generation synthetic symbioses. Wang et al. [132] generated leghemoglobin mutants in Lotus japonicus using CRISPR-Cas9, which showed synergistic roles in maintaining optimal N2 fixation in plants. Similarly, Gao et al. [133] applied cell type-specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in legumes, achieving precise gene knockout within specific nodule zones, and providing insights into stage-specific gene regulation.
Recent studies have expressed multiple nitrogenase components in cereal crops, including rice, although the stability and proteolytic degradation of these components, such as NifH, remain challenging to address. Shang et al. [134] introduced a 13-gene nitrogenase biosynthesis cluster into rice plants, resulting in the cytosolic expression of 11 nitrogenase proteins and a stable NifDK tetramer formation. NifH variants that are resistant to host plant endoproteinase degradation have been engineered to overcome this instability.

6.2. Formulation and Delivery Technologies

The method of delivering microbial inoculants determines their efficiency in hydroponic systems. Conventional nutrient solutions in hydroponics lead to the rapid leaching of bioinoculants, resulting in low microbial retention and reduced colonization, which reduces the persistence and effectiveness of the inoculants. Encapsulation technologies have gained significant attention in addressing these challenges. Alginate, a naturally derived biodegradable polysaccharide, is widely used for microbial encapsulation because of its gel-forming ability, nontoxicity, and ease of use. However, alginate beads alone cannot provide sufficient protection during drying, hardening, and storage. To enhance the stability and stress tolerance of alginate-based capsules, they are combined with organic compounds, such as starch, glycerol, chitin, skim milk, and humic acids [135]. These additives improve the capsule strength and increase microbial survival under desiccation and storage conditions. The addition of starch to alginate formulations enhances protection by promoting microbial adhesion and shielding cells from physical stress and ultraviolet radiation, which maintains their activity during storage [117]. A high starch concentration improves capsule viscosity and reduces porosity, allowing for the controlled release of microorganisms. Recently, nanocellulose-based hydrogels have emerged as novel carriers for microbial encapsulation. Owing to their high surface area, mechanical stability, and water-holding capacity, nanocellulose gels effectively deliver beneficial microbes to hydroponic systems [136].
Recent advances in encapsulation technologies have improved the shelf life and storage potential of bioinoculants, while maintaining their microbial activity. Freeze-drying removes moisture by sublimation under low-temperature and vacuum conditions, preserving the physiological integrity of diazotrophic microbes for long-term storage. Studies have shown that freeze-dried formulations maintain high activity and are readily reactivated upon application [137]. Microencapsulation using biodegradable carriers, such as alginate, starch, gum arabic, or nanocellulose, provides physical protection against UV radiation, heat, and dehydration, thereby promoting gradual root colonization in hydroponic systems [117,135,136]. Spray-freeze-drying (SFD) combines atomization and freeze-drying, wherein microbial suspensions are rapidly frozen into droplets and freeze-dried, resulting in microcapsules with high structural integrity and survival rates [138]. SFD has shown promising results in preserving probiotic bacteria during drying and in enhancing their rehydration potential [139].
The efficacy of diazotrophic bioinoculants can be enhanced by incorporating bioformulation additives such as humic substances, molasses, or prebiotics. These carbon-rich compounds stimulate microbial activity and promote the colonization of hydroponic systems. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) improves the microbial delivery and performance of bioformulations. Formulations containing CMC with A. chroococcum and Trichoderma afroharzianum enhanced plant growth, photosynthetic efficiency, and nutrient uptake in sweet basil [140]. Moreover, co-inoculation with compatible PGPR or mycorrhizal fungi has synergistic effects, resulting in improved rhizosphere colonization and resource utilization [141]. Furthermore, bioformulation stability and performance under fluctuating EC and pH conditions remain underexplored.

6.3. Optimization of Hydroponic Conditions

Optimizing the environmental parameters in hydroponic systems is crucial for enhancing the activity, persistence, and N2-fixing efficiency of diazotrophic microorganisms. Among these parameters, the regulation of pH and N2 levels in nutrient solutions is essential. A pH range of 5.5–6.5 promotes optimal nutrient availability and microbial activity [142]. The N2 source (NO3 or NH4+) can influence pH dynamics, with NO3 typically inducing alkalinization and NH4+ inducing acidification. Studies have reported that maintaining a NO3-to-NH4+ ratio of approximately 3:1 stabilizes pH, which significantly enhances microbial growth and efficient N2 fixation [143]. An adequate oxygen supply to the nutrient solution is essential for aerobic respiration in plant roots and microbial communities. Studies have reported that dissolved oxygen (DO) levels above 3.8 mg L−1 in NH4+-based systems and 5.3 mg L−1 in NO3-based systems increase photosynthetic efficiency and diazotrophic metabolism [144]. Aeration methods, such as Venturi injectors, air stones, and high-efficiency recirculating pumps, can maintain optimal DO levels in closed-loop hydroponic systems [145].
Controlling root temperature is essential for microbial growth, nitrogenase activity, and N2 fixation. The optimal temperature in the root zone ranges from 18 to 24 °C, which increases enzymatic activity and microbial community stability, whereas deviations can inhibit nitrogenase activity through enzyme denaturation or redox balance disruption [146]. The use of real-time monitoring and automation tools, such as pH, EC, total dissolved solids, and DO sensors, enhances the regulation of physicochemical parameters. The Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System (MFIS) has been shown to be efficient in maintaining optimal conditions for stabilizing microbial activity and improving plant NUE [147].
Supplementation with organic carbon sources, particularly low-molecular-weight organic acids, such as malate and citrate, enhances microbial metabolism and promotes N transfer to host plants. These compounds act as key intermediates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, promoting energy production and microbial growth under hydroponic conditions [148]. The exogenous application of these acids stimulates diazotroph activity, promoting N2 fixation while regulating root exudation patterns that shape the rhizosphere microbial community structure [149]. These modifications influence microbial colonization, nutrient cycling, and host–microbe signaling pathways. Organic acid metabolism is associated with plant responses to abiotic stress, nutrient uptake regulation, and colonization, indicating the benefits of organic acid supplementation in hydroponics [149].
Adjustments to the nutrient solution composition in hydroponic systems, particularly the NO3:NH4+ ratio, significantly influence nif gene translational regulation in diazotrophs, such as Azospirillum and Azotobacter. High concentrations of fixed N sources, such as NH4+, inhibit nif gene expression by inhibiting the transcriptional activator NifA through the action of NifL. Under N-limiting conditions, this inhibition increases, promoting nif gene expression and nitrogenase activity [150]. Maintaining a balanced NO3:NH4+ ratio is essential for plant nutrition and optimizing favorable conditions for diazotrophic gene expression and N2 fixation. The NO3-to-NH4+ ratio influences plant N2 assimilation pathways, which affect the rhizospheric biochemical environment and microbial colonization [151].

6.4. Omics-Based Monitoring and Precision Management

The integration of omics technologies, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics, has advanced our understanding of plant–microbe interactions in hydroponic systems. These high-throughput platforms facilitate holistic system-level profiling of microbial communities, indicating their taxonomic composition and functional activity. They facilitate the systematic identification of genetic elements, regulatory networks, and metabolic pathways involved in N2 fixation, phytohormone production, stress tolerance, and nutrient cycling. Multi-omics investigations have demonstrated how plant-associated microbiomes respond to abiotic stress factors, such as salinity, nutrient limitation, and temperature fluctuations, and the development of targeted microbial inoculants for hydroponic systems [16]. Metatranscriptomic and metaproteomic studies are valuable for monitoring nitrogenase expression and activity, providing insights into the physiological activity and functional potential of diazotrophs under hydroponic conditions.
Precision management strategies using real-time sensing technologies have emerged as critical tools for optimizing nutrient and environmental parameters in hydroponic systems. Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a rapid, nondestructive analytical method that can directly detect nutrient concentrations in aqueous solutions. LIBS platforms facilitate the real-time identification of nutrient imbalances, including deficiencies and toxicity, and enhance immediate corrective actions to maintain optimal nutrient conditions for plants and microbial populations [152]. The integration of omics datasets with AI and machine learning (ML) has advanced the field of smart agriculture. AI and ML are increasingly being integrated into hydroponic systems to enhance decision-making and nutrient regulation. For instance, CNN-based models trained on basil leaf images have achieved high accuracy in diagnosing N, P, and K deficiencies based on visual traits [153]. Explainable deep-learning frameworks have further advanced nondestructive phenotyping capabilities, facilitating the real-time monitoring of physiological responses in root systems [154]. At the Berkeley Lab, the RhizoNet platform uses deep convolutional architectures to segment and quantify root biomass dynamically in hydroponic contexts [155]. Moreover, a 2025 systematic review documented the efficacy of hybrid ML models, such as CNNs, DNNs, LSTM, fuzzy logic, and reinforcement learning, in smart AI-driven nutrient dosing systems that optimize EC, pH, and output nutrient concentrations in real time [156]. Integrating such AI-enabled systems provides the foundation for predictive diagnostics, adaptive nutrient schedules, and consistent microbial stability under fluctuating hydroponic conditions.
These approaches facilitate the interpretation of large heterogeneous datasets from omics platforms, sensor networks, and environmental control systems, thereby enabling the development of predictive models for nutrient scheduling, microbial applications, and environmental changes. AI-based systems have been effectively used to model plant nutrient uptake, detect early physiological stress, and regulate parameters, such as temperature, humidity, and pH. Such decision support systems have enhanced diazotroph colonization, N2-fixing efficiency, crop yields, and system resilience [17].

7. Policy, Regulation, and Commercialization of BNF-Based Inputs in Hydroponics

The integration of diazotrophs into hydroponic systems is an emerging strategy to reduce dependence on synthetic N2 fertilizers and enhance hydroponic sustainability. However, the regulatory, policy, and commercial systems governing these microbial biostimulants remain heterogeneous, underdeveloped, and dynamic, with significant regional variations. To provide a strategic context, it is noteworthy that the United States accounts for approximately 33 % of the global hydroponic crop revenue, with a large number of commercial hydroponic enterprises supported by advanced technological infrastructure [157]. Europe, led by the Netherlands and Germany, represents another key hub, while Asia–Pacific markets (especially China, India, Japan, and Singapore) are witnessing accelerated growth owing to urban agriculture strategies and investment [158]. Regarding the adoption of BNF-based biofertilizers across controlled-environment agriculture, the major biofertilizer consumers include India, China, Brazil, and the United States, mediated by policy incentives, sustainability goals, and local production targets [19].
In the European Union (EU), microbial biostimulants are regulated under Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, which classifies them under Product Function Category 6A [159]. Currently, only a limited number of microbial taxa, including Azotobacter spp., Rhizobium spp., Azospirillum spp., and mycorrhizal fungi, have been approved for agricultural use. This excludes many promising nontraditional or genetically modified diazotrophs. Researchers and agri-biotech stakeholders have advocated for periodic updates to regulatory lists based on recent advancements in microbial ecology, biotechnology, and synthetic biology [160]. The EU is developing microbe-based biostimulant products with high standards, including parameters such as viable cell count, nutrient solubilization potential, genetic stability, shelf life, and low contamination limits [161].
In the United States, the regulatory policy for microbial inoculants lacks a unified federal policy for N2-based biofertilizers. The Plant Biostimulants Act of 2023 aims to provide consistent national guidelines; however, this system is still being developed. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) permits hydroponic system certification as organic, a policy that remains controversial owing to varying interpretations by certifying bodies and concerns regarding the exclusion of soil-based ecological interactions [18]. In contrast, countries such as China, India, and Brazil have structured regulatory policies for biofertilizers, administered by their respective ministries of agriculture. These systems typically require product registration, quality testing, and field trials before market approval, which enhances the product credibility in both conventional and hydroponic systems [19].
India, a pioneer in biofertilizer development, regulates biofertilizers under the Fertilizers (Control) Order of 1985, designating them as essential commodities. This policy requires labelling norms, production standards, microbial load specifications, and contamination limits. India promotes sustainable horticulture and hydroponics through subsidies ranging from 50% to 90% under the Mission for the Integrated Development of Horticulture (MIDH). The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has formulated safety and efficacy benchmarks for hydroponically grown produce [162]. India’s BIS, under the Fertilizer Control Order (FCO) of 1985, revised in 2016 and 2021, has implemented formal specifications and testing protocols for biofertilizers, including Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, phosphate- and potassium-solubilizing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and microbial consortia, as defined in IS standards IS 17134, IS 17135, IS 17136, IS 17137, IS 17672, and IS 17755 [163]. These standards set objective quality benchmarks: minimum viable cell counts (107–109 CFU g−1), pH 6.0–8.0, moisture <10–15%, contaminant thresholds (none at 105 dilution), carrier material properties, germination/nodulation efficacy, and six-month shelf life [163]. Part A of Schedule III under the FCO provides detailed guidelines for sampling, analysis, and tolerance limits, ensuring both the safety and efficacy of BNF-based inputs [164].
From a commercialization perspective, the global market for N2-fixing biofertilizers has grown exponentially, valued at USD 800 million in 2016 and projected to exceed USD 5.2 billion by 2028 [165]. North America remains the largest market, followed by Europe and the Asia–Pacific region. Several agri-tech startups and corporations have invested in diazotrophic formulations to achieve hydroponic compatibility in their products. However, challenges related to microbial survival, colonization, and nitrogenase activity in nutrient-rich hydroponic systems remain unresolved [18].
Recent advances in microbial biotechnology and synthetic biology have led to the development of the next-generation inoculants. Modular plasmid-based gene expression systems have been engineered in A. brasilense and H. seropedicae to regulate nitrogenase activity under various conditions [166]. Similarly, engineered strains of Klebsiella variicola have shown up to a 15-fold increase in NH4+ excretion, improving N bioavailability during the vegetative growth of maize [167]. Furthermore, Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) has emerged as an N-enriched carrier, enhancing root and shoot development and increasing soluble sugar and protein content in hydroponically grown radish plants compared with conventional nutrient solutions [138]. Endophytic diazotrophs have gained attention because of their ability to colonize the internal tissues of host plants. A previous study demonstrated the successful colonization of hydroponically grown tomato plants by G. diazotrophicus under N-limited conditions, colonizing root tissues and translocating them to the aerial parts [82].
EU-funded projects, such as CORDIS Projects 832574 and 961930, are investigating the use of N2-fixing cyanobacteria for organic hydroponic fertilizer production [168,169]. The successful integration of diazotrophs into hydroponics depends on the (i) standardization of global regulatory policies, (ii) establishment of quality assurance protocols for microbial inoculants, and (iii) commercialization of robust microbial technologies. Policymakers must prioritize regulatory updates for microbial innovations, and researchers, stakeholders, and certification bodies must collaborate to develop safe and efficient microbial solutions. Investment in fundamental research, translational biotechnology, and policy coordination is crucial to realize the potential of diazotrophs in hydroponic systems for sustainable agriculture. However, standardization of microbial quality across countries remains a significant regulatory bottleneck for international commercialization.

8. Challenges and Limitations

Despite the promising results obtained by integrating diazotrophic microorganisms into hydroponic systems, this approach has several physiological, ecological, and technological limitations. However, emerging research has demonstrated targeted strategies to overcome these constraints. Unlike soil-based agroecosystems, which promote diverse microbial communities, hydroponics presents a simplified environment that can inhibit microbial colonization and BNF.
Microbial colonization is challenged by continuous nutrient flow, the absence of solid rhizospheric surfaces, and dilution effects, which reduce microbial adhesion, colonization density, and biofilm formation on the root surfaces [12]. Although endophytic colonization can partially compensate for this, many beneficial strains exhibit poor epiphytic persistence and limited endophytic competence under hydroponic conditions [44]. Biofilm development remains unstable in dynamic liquid environments because of shear stress and fluctuations in pH, EC, and DO levels, which affect the activity of diazotrophs [115,116]. Recent advances in formulation technologies, such as encapsulation in alginate–nanocellulose composites or cryoprotective matrices, have shown promise in improving microbial persistence and promoting gradual root colonization under recirculating hydroponic conditions [117,135,136].
Nitrogenase, the key enzyme in BNF, is irreversibly inactivated by oxygen, which presents a significant challenge in aerated hydroponic systems such as the NFT. This is critical for obligate diazotrophs, such as A. vinelandii and Clostridium spp., which require microaerobic or anaerobic conditions for N2 fixation. Although some strains utilize protective mechanisms, such as increased respiration, heterocyst formation in cyanobacteria, or nocturnal N2 fixation, these adaptations are strain-specific and insufficient for high BNF rates in hydroponic systems [41,46]. Engineered strains expressing flavohemoglobins and NO dioxygenase enzymes have improved nitrogenase stability under oxidative conditions. Synthetic biology approaches, including the insertion of N2 fixation operons into chassis strains with oxygen-scavenging capabilities, provide promising directions for oxygen-sensitive applications [15,131,132].
The chemical composition of commercial nutrient solutions is incompatible with the sustainability of BNF. High NO3 or NH4+ concentrations act as negative regulators of nitrogenase transcription and activity, causing downregulation of nif genes and a reduction in diazotrophic activity [139]. Moreover, excessive N promotes the growth of non-diazotrophic strains that replace the introduced diazotrophs. Strategies such as adjusting NO3:NH4+ ratios, supplementing with low-molecular-weight organic acids (e.g., malate and citrate), and applying bioavailable carbon substrates can mitigate the inhibitory effects on nif gene expression. Optimized nutrient formulations designed for diazotroph activity can support consistent BNF activity in hydroponic systems [151].
The accurate quantification of in situ N2 fixation remains a significant limitation. Most hydroponic studies have reported indirect indicators, such as plant biomass, total N content, and chlorophyll content, which cannot conclusively distinguish between biologically fixed and externally supplied N. Recent advances in omics-based tools, including metatranscriptomics of nif gene expression, biosensor-linked fluorescence assays, and real-time monitoring platforms using genetically encoded reporters, have provided high-resolution tools for BNF tracking. The integration of portable 15N isotope-based diagnostics into commercial workflows remains a key future direction [118].
Host specificity of diazotrophs in hydroponic systems is a key challenge. An effective diazotrophic strain that improves lettuce growth may not effectively colonize or function in cucumber or tomato because of differences in root architecture, exudate composition, and immune responses [44]. Native microbial communities in inert hydroponic substrates, such as rockwool and cocopeat, may outcompete the introduced strains, reducing the success of colonization. Precision inoculation strategies based on host genotype–microbiome compatibility, enabled by genome-based predictive models, have demonstrated improved success rates in recent studies [40,149].
Regulatory and technological gaps inhibit the commercialization of microbial inoculants in hydroponic systems. Most countries lack consistent biosafety guidelines, efficacy validation procedures, and quality control standards for bioinoculants in soilless systems [149]. Product variability in formulation types (liquid, alginate-encapsulated, freeze-dried), delivery methods (root zone, foliar spray, fertigation), and shelf-life stability limits practical applications and results in repeatability. Efforts toward integrating international quality assurance standards and large-scale multi-environmental trials are essential to promote the safe and effective use of diazotroph-based biofertilizers in hydroponics [117,135].
Thus, future research should integrate microbial ecology, plant physiology, synthetic biology, and real-time sensing to optimize the performance of diazotrophs in hydroponics. Smart bioprocessing tools, AI-assisted monitoring platforms, and standardized microbial formulations will drive the successful deployment of BNF-based fertilization in soilless agriculture.

9. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

N is a vital macronutrient that limits plant productivity in hydroponic systems. Although synthetic N fertilizers enhance crop yields, their excessive and inefficient use in hydroponics results in nutrient leaching, nitrate accumulation, and environmental degradation. BNF mediated by diazotrophic microorganisms provides a low-emission, circular, bioeconomic strategy for nitrogen input in hydroponic cultivation. This review examines the diversity, mechanisms, and applications of diazotrophs as sustainable alternatives to synthetic N in hydroponics.
The key findings of this review highlight that functional diazotrophs can enhance NUE, plant growth, and microbial stability under hydroponic conditions via nitrogenase activity, biofilm formation, EPS production, and signaling interactions. However, their successful integration is inhibited by oxygen sensitivity, microbial leaching, nitrate repression of nif genes, and limited regulatory frameworks.
Recent advances have provided innovative solutions to these limitations. For instance, microbial encapsulation using alginate–starch and nanocellulose matrices enhances microbial survival and root adhesion under hydroponic shear stress conditions, providing a slow and sustained release of diazotrophs. Freeze-dried and spray-freeze-dried formulations preserve microbial viability through moisture sublimation, enhancing shelf life and application efficiency.
Mechanistically, nitrate-induced repression of nif gene expression is mitigated by maintaining optimized NO3:NH4+ ratios (~3:1) in nutrient solutions, which supports both plant uptake and diazotroph activity. Supplementation with low-molecular-weight organic acids (e.g., citrate and malate) acts as a carbon substrate for the tricarboxylic acid cycle and modulates root exudation to recruit beneficial microbes.
To address nitrogenase oxygen sensitivity, engineered diazotrophs expressing flavohemoglobins and NO dioxygenases offer protection by detoxifying reactive oxygen species. Synthetic biology tools, including nif operon expression in chassis strains and modular gene circuit design, enhance nitrogenase function in non-native oxidative environments.
Omics technologies, such as metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and biosensors, are increasingly being used to profile microbial activity, identify stress-responsive genes, and quantify in situ nitrogenase expression. When integrated with AI-driven real-time monitoring (e.g., CNN, LIBS, and RhizoNet), these systems enable dynamic nutrient scheduling, microbial diagnostics, and adaptive management in hydroponic systems.
Future research should focus on the following aspects:
  • Engineering diazotrophic consortia with complementary traits such as nitrogenase activity, abiotic stress tolerance, and quorum sensing capabilities.
  • Application of genome editing (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9) to enhance N fixation genes in diazotrophs and non-diazotrophic hosts, expanding microbial applicability across diverse crops.
  • Development of real-time biosensors and portable diagnostics for tracking BNF efficiency, nitrogenase function, and colonization dynamics.
  • Standardizing protocols for the formulation, delivery, and efficacy validation of microbial bioinputs in hydroponic environments.
  • Fostering regulatory frameworks that encourage innovation while ensuring safety, reproducibility, and scale-up feasibility.
  • Facilitating public–private partnerships to promote translational research and commercialization of BNF-based solutions in vertical farming and urban agriculture.
In conclusion, diazotrophic microbes are a promising solution for decarbonized, resource-efficient, and high-yield hydroponic food systems. With sustained investments in microbial engineering, sensor technology, bioformulation science, and regulatory standardization, BNF can transition from niche trials to mainstream hydroponic fertilization practices. Future studies must prioritize long-term assessments under commercial hydroponic conditions, standardized protocols for microbial application, and comparative trials across system types. Addressing these knowledge gaps is essential to translate laboratory findings into practical and scalable BNF solutions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R. and E.O.R.P.; methodology, P.R. and M.A.-E.; software, P.R. and L.A.G.; validation, P.R. and J.C.S.-H.; formal analysis, P.R. and L.A.G.; investigation, P.R. and M.A.-E.; resources, P.R. and E.O.R.P.; data curation, P.R. and L.A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.; writing—review and editing, M.A.-E., L.A.G., E.O.R.P. and J.C.S.-H.; visualization, P.R. and E.O.R.P.; supervision, L.A.G. and E.O.R.P.; project administration, P.R. and L.A.G.; funding acquisition, M.A.-E., L.A.G. and J.C.S.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Dirección de Investigación de la Universidad Autónoma de Chile (DIUA-328-2025) and the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 25-24-00481.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

In this study, we used Paperpal, developed by Cactus Communications, Mumbai, India, an AI-powered writing assistant, to improve the grammar, language, and clarity of the manuscript. No content was generated by artificial intelligence, and all intellectual contributions, including data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions, were made solely by the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Eleazar, F.; Jaime, R.; Renganathan, P.; Gaysina, L.A.; Sukhanova, N.V.; Puente, E.O. Microalgae as Functional Food Ingredients: Nutritional Benefits, Challenges, and Regulatory Considerations for Safe Consumption. Biomass 2025, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Andrade-Bustamante, G.; Martínez-Ruiz, F.E.; Ortega-García, J.; Renganathan, P.; Gaysina, L.A.; Mahendhiran, M.; Puente, E.O. Microalgae-Based Functional Foods: A Blue-Green Revolution in Sustainable Nutrition and Health. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Renganathan, P.; Puente, E.O.; Sukhanova, N.V.; Gaysina, L.A. Hydroponics with Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Emerging Trends and Opportunities in Modern Agriculture. BioTech 2024, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goh, Y.S.; Hum, Y.C.; Lee, Y.L.; Lai, K.W.; Yap, W.S.; Tee, Y.K. A Meta-Analysis: Food Production and Vegetable Crop Yields of Hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 321, 112339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al Meselmani, M.A. Hydroponics: The Future of Sustainable Farming. In Hydroponics: The Future of Sustainable Farming; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 101–122. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hydroponics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Type (Aggregate Systems, Liquid Systems), by Crops (Tomatoes, Lettuce, Peppers, Cucumbers, Herbs), by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2021–2028. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5457654/hydroponics-market-size-share-and-trends-analysis (accessed on 14 April 2025).
  7. Babcock-Jackson, L.; Konovalova, T.; Krogman, J.P.; Bird, R.; Díaz, L.L. Sustainable Fertilizers: Publication Landscape on Wastes as Nutrient Sources, Wastewater Treatment Processes for Nutrient Recovery, Biorefineries, and Green Ammonia Synthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 8265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sabina, R.; Paul, J.; Sharma, S.; Hussain, N. Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer Pollution: Global Concerns and Sustainable Mitigating Approaches. In Agricultural Nutrient Pollution and Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 57–101. [Google Scholar]
  9. Threatt, S.D.; Rees, D.C. Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Theory, Practice, and Reality: A Perspective on the Molybdenum Nitrogenase System. FEBS Lett. 2023, 597, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cowan, N.; White, S.; Olszewska, J.; Dobel, A.; Sim, G.; Eades, L.J.; Skiba, U. Integration of Algae Treatment with Hydroponic Crop Waste to Reduce Impact of Nutrient Waste Streams. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ. 2022, 1, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishra, A.; Rajput, S.; Gupta, P.S.; Goyal, V.; Singh, S.; Sharma, S.; Shukla, S.; Singh, A.; Shukla, K.; Varma, A. Role of cyanobacteria in Rhizospheric nitrogen fixation. In Soil Nitrogen Ecology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 497–519. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bharti, A.; Prasanna, R.; Kumar, G.; Kumar, A.; Nain, L. Co-cultivation of cyanobacteria for raising nursery of chrysanthemum using a hydroponic system. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 3625–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Safaei, F.; Alirezalu, A.; Noruzi, P.; Alirezalu, K. Phytochemical and Morpho-Physiological Response of Melissa officinalis L. to Different NH4+ to NO3 Ratios under Hydroponic Cultivation. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, C.; Sun, L.; Jia, Z.; Tang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C. Microbial inoculants drive changes in soil and plant microbiomes and improve plant functions in abandoned mine restoration. Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 1162–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arkani, M.; Babaeipour, V.; Mohammadi, R.; Deldar, A. Expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene in different organisms: A new approach to increase the efficiency of various biological processes. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2025, in press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Srikanth, P.; Sivakumar, D.; Sharma, A.; Kaushik, N. Recent developments in omics techniques for improving plant abiotic stress using microbes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 3787–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Diaz-Delgado, D.; Rodriguez, C.; Bernuy-Alva, A.; Navarro, C.; Inga-Alva, A. Optimization of Vegetable Production in Hydroculture Environments Using Artificial Intelligence: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Santos, F.; Melkani, S.; Oliveira-Paiva, C.; Bini, D.; Pavuluri, K.; Gatiboni, L.; Mahmud, A.; Torres, M.; McLamore, E.; Bhadha, J.H. Biofertilizer use in the United States: Definition, regulation, and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Biological Products Industry Alliance—BPIA. The Listening Session Report: Identifying Ambiguities, Gaps, Inefficiencies, and Uncertainties in the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology; Biological Products Industry Alliance: Oakton, VA, USA, 2023; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, X.; Guo, P.; Wang, Z.; Liang, J.; Li, G.; He, W.; Zhen, A. Grafting Improves Growth and Nitrogen-Use Efficiency by Enhancing NO3 Uptake, Photosynthesis, and Gene Expression of Nitrate Transporters and Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes in Watermelon under Reduced Nitrogen Application. Plant Soil 2022, 480, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Hu, B.; Chu, C. Nitrogen Assimilation in Plants: Current Status and Future Prospects. J. Genet. Genom. 2022, 49, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, Y.; Qi, B.; Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, G.; Chen, R.; Song, S. Appropriate NH4+/NO3 Ratio Triggers Plant Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Flowering Chinese Cabbage by Optimizing the pH Value of Nutrient Solution. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 685508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Sun, G.; Song, S.; Chen, R. High NH4+/NO3 Ratio Inhibits the Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Chinese Kale at the Late Growth Stage by Ammonia Toxicity. Horticulturae 2021, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thapa, U.; Nandi, S.; Rai, R.; Upadhyay, A. Effect of Nitrogen Levels and Harvest Timing on Growth, Yield and Quality of Lettuce under Floating Hydroponic System. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 45, 2563–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Glass, A.D.; Britto, D.T.; Kaiser, B.N.; Kinghorn, J.R.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Kumar, A.; Okamoto, M.; Rawat, S.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Unkles, S.E.; et al. The Regulation of Nitrate and Ammonium Transport Systems in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Djidonou, D.; Leskovar, D.I. Seasonal Changes in Growth, Nitrogen Nutrition, and Yield of Hydroponic Lettuce. HortScience 2019, 54, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goins, G.D.; Yorio, N.C.; Wheeler, R.M. Influence of Nitrogen Nutrition Management on Biomass Partitioning and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Indices in Hydroponically Grown Potato. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chan-Navarrete, R.; Kawai, A.; Dolstra, O.; Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; van der Linden, C.G. Genetic Diversity for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) Cultivars Using the Ingestad Model on Hydroponics. Euphytica 2014, 199, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, M.; Chen, G.; Di, D.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W. Higher Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in Hybrid “Super Rice” Links to Improved Morphological and Physiological Traits in Seedling Roots. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 251, 153191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Di Mola, I.; Cozzolino, E.; Ottaiano, L.; Nocerino, S.; Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; El-Nakhel, C.; Mori, M. Nitrogen Use and Uptake Efficiency and Crop Performance of Baby Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) and Lamb’s Lettuce (Valerianella locusta L.) Grown under Variable Sub-Optimal N Regimes Combined with Plant-Based Biostimulant Application. Agronomy 2020, 10, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Renganathan, P.; Gaysina, L.A.; Jaime, R.; Carlos, J.; Omar, E. Phycoremediated Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Biomass as Biofertilizer for Sustainable Agriculture: A Holistic Biorefinery Approach to Promote Circular Bioeconomy. Biomass 2024, 4, 1047–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kwon, M.J.; Hwang, Y.; Lee, J.; Ham, B.; Rahman, A.; Azam, H.; Yang, J.S. Waste Nutrient Solutions from Full-Scale Open Hydroponic Cultivation: Dynamics of Effluent Quality and Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Using a Pilot-Scale Sequencing Batch Reactor. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 281, 111893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Park, B.; Cho, H.; Kim, M. Environmental Impact of Hydroponic Nutrient Wastewater, Used Hydroponic Growing Media, and Crop Wastes from Acyclic Hydroponic Farming System. J. Korea Org. Resour. Recycl. Assoc. 2021, 29, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  34. Karlowsky, S.; Gläser, M.; Henschel, K.; Schwarz, D. Seasonal Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Hydroponic Tomato and Cucumber Cultivation in a Commercial Greenhouse Company. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 626053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Recycle of Water, Recovery of Dissolved Nitrogen in Greenhouse Horticulture—Closing Water and Nitrate Cycles Towards Zero Liquid Discharge. Available online: https://www.wur.nl/en/research-results/chair-groups/research-funded-by-the-ministry-of-lvvn/soorten-onderzoek/kennisonline/recyle-of-water-recovery-of-dissolved-nitrogen-in-greenhouse-horticulture-closing-water-and-nitrate-cycles-towards-zero-liquid-discharge.htm (accessed on 18 April 2025).
  36. Soumare, A.; Diedhiou, A.G.; Thuita, M.; Hafidi, M.; Ouhdouch, Y.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Kouisni, L. Exploiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation: A Route Towards a Sustainable Agriculture. Plants 2020, 9, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Collado, L.; Pizarro, A.H.; Barawi, M.; García-Tecedor, M.; Liras, M. Light-driven nitrogen fixation routes for green ammonia production. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 11334–11389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wiskich, A.; Rapson, T. Economics of emerging ammonia fertilizer production methods–a role for on-farm synthesis? ChemSusChem 2023, 16, e202300565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Holland, B.L.; Matthews, M.L.; Bota, P.; Sweetlove, L.J.; Long, S.P. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of soybean and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens reveals the cost–benefit of nitrogen fixation. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Imran, A.; Hakim, S.; Tariq, M.; Nawaz, M.S.; Laraib, I.; Gulzar, U.; Hanif, M.K.; Siddique, M.J.; Hayat, M.; Fraz, A.; et al. Diazotrophs for Lowering Nitrogen Pollution Crises: Looking Deep Into the Roots. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 637815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oelze, J. Respiratory protection of nitrogenase in Azotobacter species: Is a widely held hypothesis unequivocally supported by experimental evidence? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 24, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Flores, E.; Herrero, A. Compartmentalized function through cell differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lery, L.M.; Bitar, M.; Costa, M.G.; Rössle, S.C.; Bisch, P.M. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of nitrogenase conformational protection against oxygen in diazotrophic bacteria. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carvalho, T.L.; Balsemão-Pires, E.; Saraiva, R.M.; Ferreira, P.C.; Hemerly, A.S. Nitrogen signalling in plant interactions with associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5631–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yousuf, J.; Thajudeen, J.; Rahiman, M.; Krishnankutty, S.; Alikunj, P.; Abdulla, A.M.H. Nitrogen fixing potential of various heterotrophic Bacillus strains from a tropical estuary and adjacent coastal regions. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kahindi, J.; Woomer, P.; George, T.; De Souza Moreira, F.; Karanja, N.; Giller, K. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and ecosystem function in the tropics: The role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1997, 6, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roper, M.M.; Gupta, V.V. Enhancing non-symbiotic N2 fixation in agriculture. Open Agric. J. 2016, 10, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Goebel, N.L.; Edwards, C.A.; Church, M.J.; Zehr, J.P. Modeled contributions of three types of diazotrophs to nitrogen fixation at Station ALOHA. ISME J. 2007, 1, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gradoville, M.R.; Cabello, A.M.; Wilson, S.T.; Turk-Kubo, K.A.; Karl, D.M.; Zehr, J.P. Light and depth dependency of nitrogen fixation by the non-photosynthetic, symbiotic cyanobacterium UCYN-A. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 4518–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Renganathan, P.; Borboa-Flores, J.; Rosas-Burgos, E.C.; Cárdenas-López, J.L.; Murillo-Amador, B.; Ortega-García, J.; Rueda-Puente, E.O. Inoculation of nitrogen-fixing halobacteria in the contribution to tolerance to salt stress in bean tepary. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agric. 2018, 9, 4289–4300. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pal, G.; Saxena, S.; Kumar, K.; Verma, A.; Sahu, P.K.; Pandey, A.; White, J.F.; Verma, S.K. Endophytic Burkholderia: Multifunctional roles in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 265, 127201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saranraj, P.; Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Sivasakthivelan, P.; Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Amala, K.; Thangadurai, D.; Sangeetha, J. Azospirillum Bioinoculant Technology: Past To Current Knowledge And Future Prospects. In Organic Farming for Sustainable Development; Apple Academic Press: Burlington, ON, Canada, 2022; pp. 51–76. [Google Scholar]
  53. Upadhyay, D.; Shukla, K.; Mishra, A.; Jindal, T.; Sharma, S.; Shukla, S. Molecular aspects and oxygen relations of nitrogen fixation in cyanobacteria. In Soil Nitrogen Ecology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 521–568. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nong, Q.; Malviya, M.K.; Solanki, M.K.; Solanki, A.C.; Lin, L.; Xie, J.; Mo, Z.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.; Huang, X.; et al. Sugarcane Root Transcriptome Analysis Revealed the Role of Plant Hormones in the Colonization of an Endophytic Diazotroph. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 924283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, X.; Xiao, R. Molecular dialogue in legume-rhizobium symbiosis: Signaling mechanisms and genetic insights. Rhizosphere 2025, 33, 101034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fedorova, E.; Pueyo, J.J.; Lucas, M.M. The Symbiosome: Legume and Rhizobia Co-evolution toward a Nitrogen-Fixing Organelle? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 305846. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mathesius, U. Are legumes different? Origins and consequences of evolving nitrogen fixing symbioses. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 276, 153765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gupta, S.M.; Kumar, K.; Joshi, R.K.; Gupta, S.; Bala, M. Frankia: A promising N-fixing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) improved drought tolerance in crops at higher altitude. In Microbiological Advancements for Higher Altitude Agro-Ecosystems & Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 411–431. [Google Scholar]
  59. Scaria, S.S.; Ravi, L. Symbiotic associations of Frankia in actinorhizal plants. In Microbial Symbionts; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 397–416. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hu, B.; Flemetakis, E.; Liu, Z.; Hänsch, R.; Rennenberg, H. Significance of nitrogen-fixing actinorhizal symbioses for restoration of depleted, degraded, and contaminated soil. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 752–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yusupova, A.; Kartabayeva, B.; Sushchenko, R.; Gaysina, K.; Renganathan, P.; Gaysina, L.A. Antifungal Potential of Cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. BCAC 1226 Suspension as a Biocontrol Agent Against Phytopathogenic Fungi and Oomycetes. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Condori, T.; Alarcón, S.; Huasasquiche, L.; García-Blásquez, C.; Padilla-Castro, C.; Velásquez, J.; Solórzano, R. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense as a Strategy to Reduce Nitrogen Fertilization in Cultivating Purple Maize (Zea mays L.) in the Inter-Andean Valleys of Peru. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Romero-Perdomo, F.; Abril, J.; Camelo, M.; Moreno-Galván, A.; Pastrana, I.; Rojas-Tapias, D.; Bonilla, R. Azotobacter chroococcum as a potentially useful bacterial biofertilizer for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum): Effect in reducing N fertilization. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2017, 49, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vinci, G.; Cozzolino, V.; Mazzei, P.; Monda, H.; Savy, D.; Drosos, M.; Piccolo, A. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and different phosphorus sources on Maize plants as revealed by NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics. Plant Soil 2018, 429, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kim, M.J.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Kang, S.M.; You, Y.H.; Jeong, E.J.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, I.J. Plant growth promoting effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H-2-5 on crop plants and influence on physiological changes in soybean under soil salinity. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2017, 23, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, B.; Luo, S.; Wu, Y.; Ye, J.; Wang, Q.; Xu, X.; Pan, F.; Khan, K.Y.; Feng, Y.; Yang, X. The Effects of the Endophytic Bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Sasm05 and IAA on the Plant Growth and Cadmium Uptake of Sedum alfredii Hance. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 269386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aasfar, A.; Bargaz, A.; Yaakoubi, K.; Hilali, A.; Bennis, I.; Zeroual, Y.; Meftah Kadmiri, I. Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter Species as Potential Soil Biological Enhancers for Crop Nutrition and Yield Stability. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 628379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ramos, A.C.; Melo, J.; de Souza, S.B.; Bertolazi, A.A.; Silva, R.A.; Rodrigues, W.P.; Campostrini, E.; Olivares, F.L.; Eutrópio, F.J.; Cruz, C.; et al. Inoculation with the endophytic bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae promotes growth, nutrient uptake and photosynthetic efficiency in rice. Planta 2020, 252, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Delaporte-Quintana, P.; Grillo-Puertas, M.; Lovaisa, N.C.; Teixeira, K.R.; Rapisarda, V.A.; Pedraza, R.O. Contribution of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus to phosphorus nutrition in strawberry plants. Plant Soil 2017, 419, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arstol, E.; Hohmann-Marriott, M.F. Cyanobacterial Siderophores—Physiology, Structure, Biosynthesis, and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ganusova, E.E.; Banerjee, I.; Seats, T.; Alexandre, G. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) protects Azospirillum brasilense from indole-induced stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e0238424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Oliveira, C.E.; Jalal, A.; Aguilar, J.V.; De Camargos, L.S.; Zoz, T.; Ghaley, B.B.; Alarjani, K.M.; AbdElgawad, H.; Teixeira Filho, M.C. Yield, nutrition, and leaf gas exchange of lettuce plants in a hydroponic system in response to Bacillus subtilis inoculation. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1248044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Wu, G.; Veronican Njeri, K.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, R. Induced maize salt tolerance by rhizosphere inoculation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 158, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kawicha, P.; Nitayaros, J.; Saman, P.; Thaporn, S.; Thanyasiriwat, T.; Somtrakoon, K.; Sangdee, K.; Sangdee, A. Evaluation of soil Streptomyces spp. for the biological control of Fusarium wilt disease and growth promotion in tomato and banana. Plant Pathol. J. 2023, 39, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Worsley, S.F.; Newitt, J.; Rassbach, J.; Batey, S.F.; Holmes, N.A.; Murrell, J.C.; Wilkinson, B.; Hutchings, M.I. Streptomyces endophytes promote host health and enhance growth across plant species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01053-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Moreira, V.D.; Oliveira, C.E.; Jalal, A.; Gato, I.M.; Oliveira, T.J.; Boleta, G.H.; Giolo, V.M.; Vitória, L.S.; Tamburi, K.V.; Filho, M.C. Inoculation with Trichoderma harzianum and Azospirillum brasilense increases nutrition and yield of hydroponic lettuce. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Filipini, L.D.; Pilatti, F.K.; Meyer, E.; Ventura, B.S.; Lourenzi, C.R.; Lovato, P.E. Application of Azospirillum on seeds and leaves, associated with Rhizobium inoculation, increases growth and yield of common bean. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kerečki, S.; Pećinar, I.; Karličić, V.; Mirković, N.; Kljujev, I.; Raičević, V.; Jovičić-Petrović, J. Azotobacter chroococcum F8/2: A multitasking bacterial strain in sugar beet biopriming. J. Plant Interact. 2022, 17, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abdelkrim, S.; Jebara, S.H.; Saadani, O.; Jebara, M. Potential of efficient and resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in lead uptake and plant defence stimulation in Lathyrus sativus under lead stress. Plant Biol. 2018, 20, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. James, E.K. Formulation of a highly effective inoculant for common bean based on an autochthonous elite strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and genomic-based insights into its agronomic performance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 490875. [Google Scholar]
  81. Silva, L.R.; Bento, C.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Flores-Félix, J.D.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.H.; Peix, A.; Velázquez, E. Legume bioactive compounds: Influence of rhizobial inoculation. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pallucchini, M.; Franchini, M.; Narraidoo, N.; Palframan, M.J.; Hayes, C.J.; Dent, D.; Cocking, E.C.; Perazzolli, M.; Fray, R.G.; Hill, P.J. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus AZ0019 requires functional nifD gene for optimal plant growth promotion in tomato plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1469676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Silva, R.; Filgueiras, L.; Santos, B.; Coelho, M.; Silva, M.; Vidal, M.; Baldani, J.I.; Meneses, C. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus changes the molecular mechanisms of root development in Oryza sativa L. growing under water stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Soares, F.S.; Soares, A.L.; De Souza, S.A.; Pinto, V.B.; Matiello, L.; Da Silva, F.R.; Menossi, M.; Apolinário, G. Fine-tuning of Arabidopsis thaliana response to endophytic colonization by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAL5 revealed by transcriptomic analysis. Plants 2023, 13, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lim, S.L.; Subramaniam, S.; Zamzuri, I.; Amir, H.G. Growth and biochemical profiling of artificially associated micropropagated oil palm plantlets with Herbaspirillum seropedicae. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pravisya, P.; Jayaram, K.M.; Yusuf, A. Biotic priming with Pseudomonas fluorescens induces drought stress tolerance in Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench (Okra). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Al-Karablieh, N.; Al-Shomali, I.; Al-Elaumi, L.; Hasan, K. Pseudomonas fluorescens NK4 siderophore promotes plant growth and biocontrol in cucumber. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ji, C.; Zhang, M.; Kong, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Ding, W.; Lai, H.; Guo, Q. Genomic analysis reveals potential mechanisms underlying promotion of tomato plant growth and antagonism of soilborne pathogens by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba13. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0161521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Santini, G.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; Sampietro, G.; Tredici, M.R. Effects of cyanobacterial-based biostimulants on plant growth and development: A case study on basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Uniyal, S.; Singh, P.; Singh, R.K.; Tiwari, S.P. Effects of Nostoc sp. inoculation on the yield and quality of a medicinal plant, Allium sativum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2024, 36, 3287–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Koval, E.V.; Ogorodnikova, S.Y. The prospect of using the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum to improve vital activity of barley seedlings by various methods of seed treatment. In BIO Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 36, p. 04005. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gonçalves, A.L. The use of microalgae and cyanobacteria in the improvement of agricultural practices: A review on their biofertilising, biostimulating and biopesticide roles. Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kollmen, J.; Strieth, D. The beneficial effects of cyanobacterial co-culture on plant growth. Life 2022, 12, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Moon, J.; Park, Y.J.; Choi, Y.B.; Truong, T.Q.; Huynh, P.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Kim, S.M. Physiological effects and mechanisms of Chlorella vulgaris as a biostimulant on the growth and drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants 2023, 13, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. El Lateef Gharib, F.A.; Abd El Sattar, A.M.; Ahmed, E.Z. Impact of Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina, and Arthrospira platensis as bio-stimulants on common bean plant growth, yield and antioxidant capacity. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1398. [Google Scholar]
  96. Morillas-España, A.; Ruiz-Nieto, Á.; Lafarga, T.; Acién, G.; Arbib, Z.; González-López, C.V. Biostimulant capacity of Chlorella and Chlamydopodium species produced using wastewater and centrate. Biology 2022, 11, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Puglisi, I.; La Bella, E.; Rovetto, E.I.; Lo Piero, A.R.; Baglieri, A. Biostimulant effect and biochemical response in lettuce seedlings treated with a Scenedesmus quadricauda extract. Plants 2019, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chiaiese, P.; Corrado, G.; Colla, G.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Rouphael, Y. Renewable sources of plant biostimulation: Microalgae as a sustainable means to improve crop performance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 430391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. El Lateef Gharib, F.A.; Ahmed, E.Z. Spirulina platensis improves growth, oil content, and antioxidant activity of rosemary plant under cadmium and lead stress. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8008. [Google Scholar]
  100. El-Shazoly, R.M.; Aloufi, A.S.; Fawzy, M.A. The potential use of arthrospira (Spirulina platensis) as a biostimulant for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for sustainable agriculture. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 44, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mostafa, M.M.; Hammad, D.M.; Reda, M.M.; El-Sayed, A.E. Water extracts of Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris enhance tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) tolerance against saline water irrigation. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 21181–21191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kontopoulou, C.K.; Giagkou, S.; Stathi, E.; Savvas, D.; Iannetta, P.P. Responses of Hydroponically Grown Common Bean Fed with Nitrogen-Free Nutrient Solution to Root Inoculation with N2-Fixing Bacteria. HortScience 2015, 50, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Oliveira, C.E.; Jalal, A.; Oliveira, J.R.; Tamburi, K.V.; Teixeira Filho, M.C. Leaf Inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense and Trichoderma harzianum in Hydroponic Arugula Improve Productive Components and Plant Nutrition and Reduce Leaf Nitrate. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2022, 52, e72755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Llamas, A. Microalgal and Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterial Consortia: From Interaction to Biotechnological Potential. Plants 2023, 12, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Oliveira, S.; Jalal, A.; Vitória, L.S.; Giolo, V.M.; Soares Sena Oliveira, T.J.; Aguilar, J.V.; Brambilla, M.R.; Fernandes, G.C.; Vargas, P.F.; Zoz, T.; et al. Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense strains AbV5 and AbV6 increases nutrition, chlorophyll, and leaf yield of hydroponic lettuce. Plants 2023, 12, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. da Fonseca Breda, F.A.; da Silva, T.F.; Dos Santos, S.G.; Alves, G.C.; Reis, V.M. Modulation of nitrogen metabolism of maize plants inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Setiawati, M.R.; Afrilandha, N.; Hindersah, R.; Suryatmana, P.; Fitriatin, B.N.; Kamaluddin, N.N. The effect of beneficial microorganism as biofertilizer application in hydroponic-grown tomato. Sains Tanah J. Soil Sci. Agroclimatol. 2023, 20, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Aini, N.; Dwi Yamika, W.S.; Pahlevi, R.W. The effect of nutrient concentration and inoculation of PGPR and AMF on the yield and fruit quality of hydroponic cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme). J. Appl. Hortic. 2019, 21, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Singh, K.; Guleria, V.; Kaushal, S. Utilization of biofertilizers and plant growth promoters in hydroponic production system. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 42, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Vildanova, G.I.; Allaguvatova, R.Z.; Kunsbaeva, D.F.; Sukhanova, N.V.; Gaysina, L.A. Application of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck as a biostimulant for growing cucumber seedlings in hydroponics. BioTech 2023, 12, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Karavidas, I.; Ntatsi, G.; Ntanasi, T.; Tampakaki, A.; Giannopoulou, A.; Pantazopoulou, D.; Sabatino, L.; Iannetta, P.P.; Savvas, D. Hydroponic common-bean performance under reduced N-supply level and rhizobia application. Plants 2022, 12, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nivedha, R.M.; Prasanna, R.; Bhardwaj, A.; Bavana, N.R.; Rudra, S.G.; Singh, A.K.; Lal, S.K.; Basu, S.; Shivay, Y.S. Cyanobacteria-based nutrimental strategy to enhance yield and quality of spinach. J. Appl. Phycol. 2024, 36, 2703–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Alleman, A.B.; Mus, F.; Peters, J.W. Metabolic model of the nitrogen-fixing obligate aerobe Azotobacter vinelandii predicts its adaptation to oxygen concentration and metal availability. mBio 2021, 12, e02593-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lorenzi, A.S.; Chia, M.A. Cyanobacteria’s power trio: Auxin, siderophores, and nitrogen fixation to foster thriving agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Balsanelli, E.; de Baura, V.A.; Pedrosa, F.O.; de Souza, E.M.; Monteiro, R.A. Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis enables mature biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Herbaspirillum seropedicae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Arruebarrena Di Palma, A.; Pereyra, C.M.; Moreno Ramirez, L.; Xiqui Vazquez, M.L.; Baca, B.E.; Pereyra, M.A.; Lamattina, L.; Creus, C.M. Denitrification-derived nitric oxide modulates biofilm formation in Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 338, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Balla, A.; Silini, A.; Chenari Bouket, A.; Alenezi, F.N.; Belbahri, L. Recent advances in encapsulation techniques of plant growth-promoting microorganisms and their prospects in the sustainable agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 9020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gamalero, E.; Bona, E.; Glick, B.R. Current techniques to study beneficial plant-microbe interactions. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dasgan, H.Y.; Aldiyab, A.; Elgudayem, F.; Ikiz, B.; Gruda, N.S. Effect of biofertilizers on leaf yield, nitrate amount, mineral content and antioxidants of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in a floating culture. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kurdish, I.K.; Chobotarov, A.Y.; Brovarska, O.S.; Parkhomenko, N.Y.; Chobotarova, V.V. The influence of Azotobacter vinelandii IMV B-7076 on the buckwheat development and exometabolite composition in the root zone. Mikrobiol. Zh. 2024, 86, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Putra, A.M.; Anastasya, N.A.; Rachmawati, S.W.; Yusnawan, E.; Syib‘li, M.A.; Trianti, I.; Setiawan, A.; Aini, L.Q. Growth performance and metabolic changes in lettuce inoculated with plant growth promoting bacteria in a hydroponic system. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 327, 112868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sebring, R.L.; Duiker, S.W.; Berghage, R.D.; Regan, J.M.; Lambert, J.D.; Bryant, R.B. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus inoculation of two lettuce cultivars affects leaf and root growth under hydroponic conditions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Plocek, G.; Rueda Kunz, D.; Simpson, C. Impacts of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Trichoderma spp. on Pac Choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) grown in different hydroponic systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1438038. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Gayathri, M.; Shunmugam, S.; Sridhar, J.; Muralitharan, G. Evaluating the augmented effect of potential plant growth promoting cyanobacterial strains on salinity and insecticidal stress tolerance of Oryza sativa L. under hydroponic cultivation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2024, 36, 1885–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rueda, D.; Valencia, G.; Soria, N.; Rueda, B.B.; Manjunatha, B.; Kundapur, R.R.; Selvanayagam, M. Effect of Azospirillum spp. and Azotobacter spp. on the growth and yield of strawberry (Fragaria vesca) in hydroponic system under different nitrogen levels. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 6, 048–054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gravel, V.; Martinez, C.; Antoun, H.; Tweddell, R.J. Control of greenhouse tomato root rot [Pythium ultimum] in hydroponic systems, using plant-growth-promoting microorganisms. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 28, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Brouzes, E.; Medkova, M.; Savenelli, N.; Marran, D.; Twardowski, M.; Hutchison, J.B.; Rothberg, J.M.; Link, D.R.; Perrimon, N.; Samuels, M.L. Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14195–14200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Agresti, J.J.; Antipov, E.; Abate, A.R.; Ahn, K.; Rowat, A.C.; Baret, J.; Marquez, M.; Klibanov, A.M.; Griffiths, A.D.; Weitz, D.A. Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4004–4009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yuan, H.; Tu, R.; Tong, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q. Ultrahigh-throughput screening of industrial enzyme-producing strains by droplet-based microfluidic system. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 49, kuac007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rud, I.; Jensen, P.R.; Naterstad, K.; Axelsson, L. A synthetic promoter library for constitutive gene expression in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microbiology 2006, 152, 1011–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ito, Y.; Yoshidome, D.; Hidaka, M.; Araki, Y.; Ito, K.; Kosono, S.; Nishiyama, M. Improvement of the nitrogenase activity in Escherichia coli that expresses the nitrogen fixation-related genes from Azotobacter vinelandii. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 728, 150345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, L.; Rubio, M.C.; Xin, X.; Zhang, B.; Fan, Q.; Wang, Q.; Ning, G.; Becana, M.; Duanmu, D. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of leghemoglobin genes in Lotus japonicus uncovers their synergistic roles in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 818–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gao, J.P.; Su, Y.; Jiang, S.; Liang, W.; Lou, Z.; Frugier, F.; Xu, P.; Murray, J.D. Applying conventional and cell-type-specific CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in legume plants. aBIOTECH 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
  134. Shang, Y.; Shi, H.; Liu, M.; Lan, P.; Li, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, S. Using synthetic biology to express nitrogenase biosynthesis pathway in rice and to overcome barriers of nitrogenase instability in plant cytosol. Trends Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 946–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rojas-Sánchez, B.; Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Morales-Cedeño, L.R.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Saucedo-Martínez, B.C.; Sánchez-Yáñez, J.M.; Fadiji, A.E.; Babalola, O.O.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. Bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants: Mechanisms, formulation types and application techniques. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 198–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mondéjar-López, M.; García-Simarro, M.P.; Navarro-Simarro, P.; Gómez-Gómez, L.; Ahrazem, O.; Niza, E. A review on the encapsulation of “eco-friendly” compounds in natural polymer-based nanoparticles as next generation nano-agrochemicals for sustainable agriculture and crop management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
  137. Holkem, A.T.; Raddatz, G.C.; Nunes, G.L.; Cichoski, A.J.; Jacob-Lopes, E.; Ferreira Grosso, C.R.; De Menezes, C.R. Development and characterization of alginate microcapsules containing Bifidobacterium BB-12 produced by emulsification/internal gelation followed by freeze drying. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 71, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rathore, S.; Desai, P.M.; Liew, C.V.; Chan, L.W.; Heng, P.W.S. Microencapsulation of microbial cells. J. Food Eng. 2013, 116, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Semyonov, D.; Ramon, O.; Kaplun, Z.; Levin-Brener, L.; Gurevich, N.; Shimoni, E. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus paracasei by spray freeze drying. Food Res. Int. 2009, 43, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Comite, E.; El-Nakhel, C.; Rouphael, Y.; Ventorino, V.; Pepe, O.; Borzacchiello, A.; Vinale, F.; Rigano, D.; Staropoli, A.; Lorito, M.; et al. Bioformulations with Beneficial Microbial Consortia, a Bioactive Compound and Plant Biopolymers Modulate Sweet Basil Productivity, Photosynthetic Activity and Metabolites. Pathogens 2021, 10, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Begum, N.; Wang, L.; Ahmad, H.; Akhtar, K.; Roy, R.; Khan, M.I.; Zhao, T. Co-inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improve Growth and Photosynthesis in Tobacco Under Drought Stress by Up-Regulating Antioxidant and Mineral Nutrition Metabolism. Microb. Ecol. 2022, 83, 971–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sulaiman, H.; Yusof, A.A.; Mohamed Nor, M.K. Automated Hydroponic Nutrient Dosing System: A Scoping Review of pH and Electrical Conductivity Dosing Frameworks. AgriEngineering 2025, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Langenfeld, N.J.; Bugbee, B. Sustainable Hydroponics Using Zero-discharge Nutrient Management and Automated pH Control. HortScience 2024, 59, 1202–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Roosta, H.R. The responses of pepper plants to nitrogen form and dissolved oxygen concentration of nutrient solution in hydroponics. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Chaudhary, A.; Anand, S. Soilless cultivation: A distinct vision for sustainable agriculture. In Artificial Intelligence and Smart Agriculture: Technology and Applications; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 337–368. [Google Scholar]
  146. Zehr, J.P.; Capone, D.G. Factors Controlling N2 Fixation. In Marine Nitrogen Fixation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  147. Agustian, I.; Prayoga, B.I.; Santosa, H.; Daratha, N.; Faurina, R. NFT Hydroponic Control Using Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2208.00364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Panchal, P.; Miller, A.J.; Giri, J. Organic acids: Versatile stress-response roles in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4038–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Meng, H.; Yan, Z.; Li, X. Effects of exogenous organic acids and flooding on root exudates, rhizosphere bacterial community structure, and iron plaque formation in Kandelia obovata seedlings. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 830, 154695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Huang, K.; Wang, F.; Mei, Z. Molecular Mechanism and Agricultural Application of the NifA–NifL System for Nitrogen Fixation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhang, K.; Wu, Y.; Hang, H. Differential contributions of NO3−/NH4+ to nitrogen use in response to a variable inorganic nitrogen supply in plantlets of two Brassicaceae species in vitro. Plant Methods 2019, 15, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lim, D.; Keerthi, K.; Perumbilavil, S.; Suchand Sandeep, C.S.; Antony, M.M.; Matham, M.V. A real-time on-site precision nutrient monitoring system for hydroponic cultivation utilizing LIBS. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2024, 11, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gul, Z.; Bora, S. Exploiting Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection of Nutrient Deficiencies in Hydroponic Basil. Sensors 2023, 23, 5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mostafa, S.; Mondal, D.; Panjvani, K.; Kochian, L.; Stavness, I. Explainable deep learning in plant phenotyping. Front. Artif. Intell. 2023, 6, 1203546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Sordo, Z.; Andeer, P.; Sethian, J.; Northen, T.; Ushizima, D. RhizoNet segments plant roots to assess biomass and growth for enabling self-driving labs. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 12907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Catota-Ocapana, P.; Minaya-Andino, C.; Astudillo, P.; Pichoasamin, D. Smart control models used for nutrient management in hydroponic crops: A systematic review. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 13070–13087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hydroponics Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by Type, Crop Type, Equipment, and Region, 2025–2033. Available online: https://www.imarcgroup.com/hydroponics-market (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  158. Hydroponics Technologies Market. Available online: https://dataintelo.com/report/global-hydroponics-technologies (accessed on 11 June 2025).
  159. EU Regulation 2019/1009. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1009/oj/eng (accessed on 8 May 2025).
  160. Ibáñez, A.; Garrido-Chamorro, S.; Vasco-Cárdenas, M.F.; Barreiro, C. From lab to field: Biofertilizers in the 21st century. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Malusá, E.; Vassilev, N. A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 6599–6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Naresh, R.; Jadav, S.K.; Singh, M.; Patel, A.; Singh, B.; Beese, S.; Pandey, S.K. Role of hydroponics in improving water-use efficiency and food security. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 608–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. BIS. Indian Standards for Liquid Biofertilizer Specifications: IS 17134, IS 17135, IS 17136, IS 17137, IS 17672, IS 17755. Bureau of Indian Standards 2021–2022. Available online: https://www.services.bis.gov.in/php/BIS_2.0/bisconnect/get_is_list_by_category_id/15 (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  164. Arjjumend, H.; Koutouki, K. Analysis of Indian and Canadian Laws on Biofertilizers. J. Agric. Environ. Law 2021, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Biofertilizers Market by Type (Nitrogen-Fixing, Phosphate Solubilizing & Mobilizing, Potassium Solubilizing & Mobilizing), Mode of Application (Soil Treatment, Seed Treatment), Form, Crop Type and Region–Global Forecast to 2028. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/compound-biofertilizers-customized-fertilizers-market-856.html (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  166. Kulakowski, S.; Rivier, A.; Kuo, R.; Mengel, S.; Eng, T. Development of modular expression across phylogenetically distinct diazotrophs. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 51, kuae033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Martinez-Feria, R.; Simmonds, M.B.; Ozaydin, B.; Lewis, S.; Schwartz, A.; Pluchino, A.; McKellar, M.; Gottlieb, S.S.; Kayatsky, T.; Vital, R.; et al. Genetic remodeling of soil diazotrophs enables partial replacement of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer with biological nitrogen fixation in maize. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. CORDIS Projects 832574. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/832574 (accessed on 25 May 2025).
  169. CORDIS Projects 961930. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/961930 (accessed on 25 May 2025).
Figure 1. Nitrogen assimilation by plants. NR: NO3 reductase; 2-OG: 2-oxoglutarate; ASN: asparagine synthetase; Asn: asparagine; Asp: aspartate; CP: carbamoylphosphate; CPSase: carbamoylphosphate synthetase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; Gln: glutamine; Glu: glutamate; GOGAT: glutamine-2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase; GS: glutamine synthetase; NiR: NO2 reductase.
Figure 1. Nitrogen assimilation by plants. NR: NO3 reductase; 2-OG: 2-oxoglutarate; ASN: asparagine synthetase; Asn: asparagine; Asp: aspartate; CP: carbamoylphosphate; CPSase: carbamoylphosphate synthetase; GDH: glutamate dehydrogenase; Gln: glutamine; Glu: glutamate; GOGAT: glutamine-2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase; GS: glutamine synthetase; NiR: NO2 reductase.
Sustainability 17 05922 g001
Figure 2. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck suspension on cucumber seedlings under hydroponic conditions in Knop nutrient medium. (A) Control group without Chlorella; (B) treatment group supplemented with Chlorella suspension. The visible difference showed that the seedlings in treatment group (B) exhibited enhanced root system development, characterized by greater root length and denser lateral root proliferation, compared to the control (A), indicating a biostimulatory effect under hydroponic conditions [110].
Figure 2. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck suspension on cucumber seedlings under hydroponic conditions in Knop nutrient medium. (A) Control group without Chlorella; (B) treatment group supplemented with Chlorella suspension. The visible difference showed that the seedlings in treatment group (B) exhibited enhanced root system development, characterized by greater root length and denser lateral root proliferation, compared to the control (A), indicating a biostimulatory effect under hydroponic conditions [110].
Sustainability 17 05922 g002
Table 1. Representative diazotrophic microorganisms and their N2 fixation rates reported under various ecological conditions. Units vary depending on the system (soil, aquatic, or symbiotic). Reported N2 fixation rates were estimated using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA).
Table 1. Representative diazotrophic microorganisms and their N2 fixation rates reported under various ecological conditions. Units vary depending on the system (soil, aquatic, or symbiotic). Reported N2 fixation rates were estimated using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA).
Microbial SpeciesEstimated N2 Fixation RateReference
Bacillus megaterium210.05 ± 7.0 nmol C2H4 mg−1 protein day−1[45]
Bacillus flexus108.76 ± 3.66 nmol C2H4 mg−1 protein day−1
Bacillus circulans98.28 ± 4.32 nmol C2H4 mg−1 protein day−1
Rhizobium spp.24–584 kg ha−1[46]
Frankia spp.2–362 kg ha−1
Anabaena spp.45–450 kg ha−1
Anabaena spp.0.0216–0.073 g N m−2 day−1[47]
Nostoc spp.0.11–0.48 N m−2 day−1
Trichodesmium spp.92 mmol N m−2 year−1 (range: 40–150)[48]
UCYN-A (Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa)4.9–9.1 nmol N L−1 d−1[49]
Table 3. Case studies of N2-fixing microbial inoculants that enhance the growth, nutrition, and stress resilience of crops under hydroponic conditions.
Table 3. Case studies of N2-fixing microbial inoculants that enhance the growth, nutrition, and stress resilience of crops under hydroponic conditions.
Host PlantN2-Fixing Microbial SpeciesKey FindingsReference
Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.)Chlorella vulgaris, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus megaterium, and Pseudomonas fluorescensIncreased yield, leaf area, branches, phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidants, nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu)[119]
Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum)Azotobacter vinelandiiEnhanced plant growth, chlorophyll A, exometabolites, proteins, carbohydrates, phenolics[120]
Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)Anabaena torulosa, Anabaena doliolum, Anabaena laxaImproved IAA production, biofilm formation, PEPC, leaf chlorophyll[118]
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Rhizobium sophoriradicis, Rhizobium tropiciIncreased nodulation, N2 fixation, and pod yield[111]
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)Azospirillum brasilenseIncreased fresh biomass, nutrient uptake (N, P, K, Ca, Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe), leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthesis[119]
A brasilense, Trichoderma harzianumIncreased root growth, leaf number, nutrient uptake (K, P, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn), reduced NO3 accumulation[76]
Pseudomonas lundensis, Pseudomonas migulaeImproved plant growth, IAA, ISR, myo-inositol, and acetic acid[121]
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicusIncreased plant biomass, NUE[122]
Maize (Zea mays L.)Herbaspirillum seropedicae, A. brasilenseEnhanced dry biomass, nutrients (N, P, K), NO3 assimilation, NO3 reductase activity, reduced NH4+ and sugar levels[120]
Bacillus amyloliquefaciensPromoted seedling growth, leaf chlorophyll, soluble sugars, glutathione, antioxidant enzyme activity (POD, CAT), reduced Na+ accumulation and modulated stress-related genes (e.g., RBCS, RBCL, HKT1, NHX1-3)[73]
Pac choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis)Bacillus amyloliquefaciensImproved NUE[123]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Nostoc commune, Scytonema bohneriIncreased shoot and root length, biomass, and leaf area under chlorpyrifos stress[124]
Strawberry (Fragaria vesca)Azotobacter spp., Azospirillum spp.Increased plant height, leaf chlorophyll, root biomass, yield, and soluble solid content[125]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas marginalis, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas syringaeReduced Pythium ultimum-induced root rot, increased seedling growth and fruit yield[126]
Arthrospira platensisIncreased plant growth, root weight, and node development[3]
Abbreviations: IAA, indole acetic acid; PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; ISR, induced systematic resistance; NUE, nitrogen use efficiency.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Renganathan, P.; Astorga-Eló, M.; Gaysina, L.A.; Puente, E.O.R.; Sainz-Hernández, J.C. Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135922

AMA Style

Renganathan P, Astorga-Eló M, Gaysina LA, Puente EOR, Sainz-Hernández JC. Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation. Sustainability. 2025; 17(13):5922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135922

Chicago/Turabian Style

Renganathan, Prabhaharan, Marcia Astorga-Eló, Lira A. Gaysina, Edgar Omar Rueda Puente, and Juan Carlos Sainz-Hernández. 2025. "Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation" Sustainability 17, no. 13: 5922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135922

APA Style

Renganathan, P., Astorga-Eló, M., Gaysina, L. A., Puente, E. O. R., & Sainz-Hernández, J. C. (2025). Nitrogen Fixation by Diazotrophs: A Sustainable Alternative to Synthetic Fertilizers in Hydroponic Cultivation. Sustainability, 17(13), 5922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135922

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop