Next Article in Journal
Classification of Hiking Difficulty Levels of Accessible Natural Trails
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Green Finance and Financial Globalization on Environmental Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities

1
School of Surveying, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
2
Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology (CTLT), University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5697; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135697
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 11 June 2025 / Accepted: 16 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025

Abstract

Green Infrastructure (GI) has increasingly been recognised as a crucial strategy for enhancing urban resilience, particularly in urban transportation systems facing the challenges of climate change. Although several conceptual frameworks for GI planning have been proposed, empirical studies examining their application in urban transport planning contexts remain limited. This study aims to validate a recently developed GI conceptual framework by evaluating its applicability in urban transportation systems. A structured questionnaire was administered to 94 participants in Aotearoa New Zealand comprising urban planners, engineers, architects, policymakers, and academics involved in transportation and sustainability planning with special focus on GI. The framework was assessed across key dimensions including the perceived benefits of GI in transportation, stakeholder and collaborative practices barriers to implementation, and indicators of perceived effectiveness. The results confirm that the stakeholders’ perceptions of GI are significantly aligned with the dimensions of the conceptual framework, reinforcing its validity in assessing GI effectiveness. Key findings highlight a disconnect between stakeholders’ general familiarity with GI and their understanding of its multifunctional benefits beyond stormwater management. Also, the prevalence of multidisciplinary collaboration suggests that additional interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches are required for more holistic GI planning. This study recommends that the conceptual framework be considered for city adaptation to GI integration, and to do so effectively, these knowledge and cooperation gaps must be addressed
Keywords: green infrastructure; conceptual framework; urban resilience; urban transport planning; validity green infrastructure; conceptual framework; urban resilience; urban transport planning; validity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ukonze, F.I.; Moore, A.; Leonard, G.; Daniel, B. Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135697

AMA Style

Ukonze FI, Moore A, Leonard G, Daniel B. Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities. Sustainability. 2025; 17(13):5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ukonze, Frances Ifeoma, Antoni Moore, Greg Leonard, and Ben Daniel. 2025. "Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities" Sustainability 17, no. 13: 5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135697

APA Style

Ukonze, F. I., Moore, A., Leonard, G., & Daniel, B. (2025). Assessing the Validity of a Green Infrastructure Conceptual Framework for Urban Transport Planning: Insights for Building Resilient Cities. Sustainability, 17(13), 5697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop