Next Article in Journal
Bridging Heritage Conservation and Urban Sustainability: A Multidimensional Coupling Framework for Walkability, Greening, and Cultural Heritage in the Historic City of Shenyang
Previous Article in Journal
Framework for Estimating Environmental Carrying Capacity in Diverse Climatic Conditions and Fish Farming Production in Neotropical Reservoirs
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Method for Calculating the Optimal Size of Energy Storage for a GENCO
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comparative Modeling Framework for Forecasting Distributed Energy Resource Adoption Under Trend-Based and Goal-Oriented Scenarios

by
Zheng Grace Ma
*,
Magnus Værbak
and
Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen
SDU Center for Energy Informatics, Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, The Faculty of Engineering, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5283; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125283 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 April 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 4 June 2025 / Published: 7 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling, Control, and Optimization of Hybrid Energy Systems)

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of Distributed Energy Resource (DER) adoption is essential for decarbonization, effective policy, and infrastructure planning. This paper develops a comparative framework integrating trend-based and goal-oriented approaches using the logistic growth and Bass diffusion models. Using Danish household data for electric vehicles (EVs), heat pumps (HPs), and rooftop photovoltaics (PVs), we evaluate four logistic-growth-based and two Bass-diffusion-based methods. Each method supports standard curve-fitting (trend-based) or incorporates explicit policy goals (goal-based), such as reaching a specified adoption threshold by a target year. An integrated flow diagram visually summarizes the decision process for method selection based on data availability, market maturity, and policy targets. Results show that Bass diffusion excels in early-stage or policy-driven markets like EVs, while logistic approaches perform better for PVs after subsidies are removed, with HP adoption falling in between. A key innovation is integrating future adoption targets into parameter estimation, enabling stakeholders to assess the required acceleration in adoption rates. The findings highlight the need to align model choice with data, market conditions, and policy objectives, offering practical guidance to accelerate DER deployment.
Keywords: distributed energy resources; technology adoption; logistic growth model; Bass diffusion model; forecasting; energy planning distributed energy resources; technology adoption; logistic growth model; Bass diffusion model; forecasting; energy planning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Z.G.; Værbak, M.; Jørgensen, B.N. A Comparative Modeling Framework for Forecasting Distributed Energy Resource Adoption Under Trend-Based and Goal-Oriented Scenarios. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125283

AMA Style

Ma ZG, Værbak M, Jørgensen BN. A Comparative Modeling Framework for Forecasting Distributed Energy Resource Adoption Under Trend-Based and Goal-Oriented Scenarios. Sustainability. 2025; 17(12):5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Zheng Grace, Magnus Værbak, and Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen. 2025. "A Comparative Modeling Framework for Forecasting Distributed Energy Resource Adoption Under Trend-Based and Goal-Oriented Scenarios" Sustainability 17, no. 12: 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125283

APA Style

Ma, Z. G., Værbak, M., & Jørgensen, B. N. (2025). A Comparative Modeling Framework for Forecasting Distributed Energy Resource Adoption Under Trend-Based and Goal-Oriented Scenarios. Sustainability, 17(12), 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop