1. Introduction
Urbanization is progressing at an unprecedented pace. The United Nations predicts that by 2050, the global urban population will increase by 2.2 billion compared to 2021, with the urbanization level rising from 56 to 68%. Urbanization, as a crucial driver of economic growth, simultaneously presents severe environmental challenges [
1]. Against this backdrop, the zero-waste city concept has emerged as an innovative governance model addressing ecological dilemmas in urban development. Urban solid waste management not only concerns environmental quality but also serves as a critical lever for achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals [
2]. With continuous urban population expansion, fossil fuel consumption surges, leading to a dramatic increase in greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbating urban climate change. Synchronous industrialization during the urbanization process further intensifies the generation of pollutants such as exhaust gases and industrial waste [
3].
Within the complex ecological challenges of urban development, energy consumption intensity emerges as a key measurement indicator and improvement focus. The 2024 Chinese Government Work Report clearly stated the importance of bolstering the construction of ecological civilization, encouraging the development of green and low-carbon initiatives, and consistently moving toward carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, aiming for a roughly 2.5% decrease in energy consumption per unit of GDP [
4]. This signifies that reducing energy consumption intensity and achieving economically efficient energy conservation have become hard constraints in government economic work. Statistics reveal that in 2020, urban energy consumption accounted for 86.9% of China’s total national energy consumption, approximately 18% higher than the international average [
5]. Consequently, energy consumption has become primarily concentrated in cities, and effectively reducing urban energy consumption intensity is of paramount significance for comprehensive energy conservation in economic and social domains.
To achieve economic energy-saving objectives, the State Council’s General Office initiated the zero-waste city pilot (ZWCP) program in 2019. According to data from the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the first batch of “11 + 5” ZWCP projects has been officially launched, aiming to explore new pathways for urban sustainable development through source reduction, resource utilization, and the safe disposal of solid waste. Although urban solid waste management accounts for merely 3–5% of total societal carbon emissions, source reduction, resource recycling, and high-standard harmless disposal can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Zero-waste city construction is not only an innovative concept in solid waste management but also a crucial mechanism for achieving carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals. Pilot cities, based on regional industrial structures and development stages, precisely identify critical points in the solid waste lifecycle, and through systematic integration and collaborative linkage, continuously enhance urban solid waste reduction, resource utilization, and harmless treatment levels [
6].
The existing literature on energy consumption intensity primarily focuses on the following aspects—First, research on factors influencing energy consumption intensity: Scholars have explored key elements affecting energy consumption intensity based on multiple dimensions, including industrial structure, technological innovation, and economic development. Li et al. [
7] found that low-carbon city pilot policies significantly reduce urban energy intensity through green technological innovation and environmental governance, with the mediation effect of green technological innovation reaching 40.80%. Khosravi et al. [
8] demonstrated that the environmental “fee-to-tax” policy can reduce energy consumption by optimizing industrial structure and increasing technological innovation investment. Second, research on the impact mechanism of environmental policies on energy consumption intensity: Current studies predominantly examine the impact of various types of environmental policies on energy savings and emission reductions. For instance, Liao et al. [
9] studied the spatial energy-saving effects of energy use rights trading systems, while Wang et al. [
10] analyzed energy-saving and emission reduction mechanisms from a digital economy perspective. These studies indicate that environmental policies are crucial means of regulating energy consumption intensity. Third, regional heterogeneity research: Scholars have discovered significant regional differences in the energy-saving effects of environmental policies. Liu et al. [
11] noted that low-carbon city pilot policies demonstrate more pronounced energy-saving effects in eastern and western cities, southern cities, and top 100 economic cities. Shu et al. [
12] similarly showed that environmental taxes have more significant energy consumption reduction effects in eastern regions and old industrial areas. However, compared to other environmental policy research, academic studies on ZWCP policies remain relatively weak: Bi et al. [
13] used DID and machine learning methods to find that ZWCP policies significantly advance green technological innovation; Ray et al. [
14] employed quasi-experimental methods to confirm the policy’s effectiveness in promoting urban green and low-carbon transformation; and Liu et al. [
15], based on microenterprise-level data, further revealed the significant positive impact of ZWCP policies on enterprise green innovation.
Existing research still has the following limitations: firstly, research on the impact of ZWCP policies on energy consumption intensity is relatively scarce; secondly, existing studies primarily focus on single policies such as low-carbon cities and environmental taxes, lacking systematic analysis of ZWCP policies; thirdly, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the action mechanisms of and regional variations in ZWCP policies; and fourthly, traditional econometric methods may face endogeneity and omitted-variable issues, impacting the reliability of causal inference.
Based on this, this study selects 274 cities in China from 2010 to 2022 as the research sample and employs a double machine learning model to systematically examine the impact of pilot policies on urban energy consumption intensity. The study focuses on the following key questions: Do ZWCP policies reduce energy intensity in pilot cities? What are the impact mechanisms of pilot policies on urban energy intensity? What heterogeneous characteristics exist in pilot cities’ effects on energy intensity? By deeply investigating these issues, this paper aims to clarify the implementation effects of China’s ZWCP policies, scientifically assess the energy-saving effects of pilot policies, and provide a decision-making basis for the promotion of ZWCP policies during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period and the achievement of the “30·60” carbon emission target.
The marginal contributions of this paper are primarily reflected in three aspects: First, this study represents an initial comprehensive examination of how ZWCP policies affect urban energy consumption intensity, including their impact effects, mechanisms of action, and regional differences. This research contributes to the theoretical framework surrounding environmental policies and urban sustainable development. By constructing multi-dimensional theoretical analysis paths, this paper reveals the complex action mechanisms of urban energy consumption intensity, providing a new academic perspective for understanding the micro-level impacts of environmental regulation. Second, by introducing a double machine learning model for empirical analysis, this paper effectively controls covariate influences and overcomes the “curse of dimensionality” in traditional econometric methods. Compared to traditional econometric methods, this model significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of causal inference, providing a more precise technical approach for quantitative research on environmental policy impacts. Finally, based on machine learning technology, this paper uses multiple programming languages to construct robust tests for causal forest models and visualizes the importance of control variables, effectively avoiding the inherent defects of machine learning’s “black box” operations. This multi-dimensional, multi-tool research paradigm not only enhances the reliability of empirical results but also provides a reference for subsequent environmental policy research.
5. Heterogeneity Test
5.1. Agglomeration Type
The implementation effects of the ZWCP policy may exhibit significant differences due to urban hierarchy and developmental characteristics between cities, which is reflected in the policy execution outcomes between urban and non-urban agglomerations. Based on this, this study systematically reviews relevant policy documents of national-level urban agglomerations and refines the research sample into two categories: urban agglomerations and non-urban agglomerations. Specifically, the urban agglomerations covered in this study include Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, Chengdu–Chongqing, Guanzhong, Central Plains, Shandong Peninsula, Beibu Gulf, and the coastal urban agglomerations of Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang.
The results of the regression analysis (as shown in Columns (1) and (2) of
Table 7) reveal a complex policy execution mechanism: within urban agglomerations, the ZWCP policy does not significantly suppress urban energy consumption intensity. This phenomenon may stem from the economic structure and developmental inertia within urban agglomerations. Generally, urban agglomerations exhibit a high degree of economic interconnectedness, characterized by complex industrial chains, dense factor flows, and deep regional collaboration. This integrated development model may weaken the direct regulatory effects of any single policy, making it challenging for the ZWCP policy to achieve significant regulatory effects on energy consumption intensity within urban agglomerations [
39]. In contrast, for non-urban agglomerations, the ZWCP policy demonstrates a significant suppressive effect on energy consumption intensity. This is primarily due to the relatively limited economic scale and relatively simple industrial structure of cities in non-urban agglomerations, which lack the complex economic networks found in urban agglomerations. In these cities, the ZWCP policy can more directly and effectively influence the urban energy consumption system, optimizing resource allocation and promoting green technology innovation, thereby effectively reducing energy consumption intensity. The research results clearly indicate that the ZWCP policy has a significant suppressive effect on urban energy consumption intensity in non-urban agglomerations, providing important policy support for regional green transformation.
5.2. Geographical Location
Differences in geographical location may lead to significant variations in industrial structure, technological innovation capabilities, and resource endowments among cities, which can affect the energy-saving effects of ZWCP policies. Based on the cities’ geographical locations, this study divides the sample cities into coastal and inland categories to explore the heterogeneous impacts of pilot policies across different regions.
As shown in Columns (3) and (4) of
Table 7, the ZWCP policy has a significant inhibitory effect on energy consumption intensity in inland cities, while its impact on coastal cities is not statistically significant. This result can be attributed to the following mechanisms: First, the industrial structure in inland areas is relatively homogeneous, mainly characterized by traditional high-energy-consumption and high-pollution industries. These regions require policy guidance to achieve industrial transformation and upgrading. The ZWCP policy can effectively reduce energy consumption intensity in inland cities by promoting green technological innovation and optimizing industrial structure. Second, compared to developed coastal regions, inland areas have a relatively weak foundation in green innovation and environmental governance. The pilot policy provides crucial institutional incentives for these regions, motivating local governments and enterprises to place greater emphasis on energy conservation and emission reduction. By encouraging green technological innovation and increasing fiscal expenditure on environmental governance, inland cities can better leverage policy dividends and drive the transformation of energy consumption patterns. In contrast, coastal regions already have a relatively sophisticated industrial structure, with higher levels of economic development and technological innovation capabilities. Consequently, the marginal effect of ZWCP policies is relatively weak. Enterprises in these areas may already possess a high awareness of energy conservation and emission reduction, as well as advanced technological capabilities, making the policy’s guiding role less significant compared to inland regions.
5.3. City Scale
The heterogeneity of urban scale may lead to significant variations in the effectiveness of ZWCP policies in managing energy consumption intensity. Based on population scale, this study divides sample cities into large cities and small-to-medium-sized cities to investigate the differentiated impacts of pilot policies across different urban scales.
As shown in Columns (5) and (6) of
Table 7, the ZWCP policy demonstrates a significant suppressive effect on energy consumption intensity in small-to-medium-sized cities, while its impact on large cities remains relatively weak. From a mechanism perspective, this phenomenon can be interpreted through multiple dimensions: Large cities generally face more complex energy dependency lock-in challenges. Due to their substantial economic scale and complex industrial structures, the energy consumption systems of large cities exhibit persistent path dependencies, along with high transformation costs that notably constrain the marginal effects of pilot policies. In contrast, small-to-medium-sized cities have relatively simpler industrial structures, clearer transformation pathways, and stronger system resilience and adaptability, enabling them to more agilely respond to policy guidance and rapidly optimize energy consumption patterns.
In terms of innovation dynamics, small-to-medium-sized cities reveal more pronounced potential advantages. These cities typically demonstrate higher policy sensitivity and reform willingness, capable of swiftly and effectively implementing ZWCP policies. These policies provide crucial institutional incentives for small-to-medium-sized cities, effectively reducing energy consumption intensity by encouraging green technological innovation and guiding adjustments in industrial structure. Compared to large cities, small-to-medium-sized cities have more concentrated innovation resources, making it easier to form policy synergies and accelerate the transformation of energy consumption models.