Next Article in Journal
A Model for Streamlining Benchmarking in Sustainable Development of Industries
Next Article in Special Issue
Modelling the Combined Effect of Green Leadership and Human Resource Management in Moving to Green Supply Chain Performance Enhancement in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Introducing Industrial Clusters in Multi-Node Energy System Modelling by the Application of the Industry–Infrastructure Quadrant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Manufacturing Supply Chain Performance Enhancement through Technology Utilization and Process Innovation in Industry 4.0: A SEM-PLS Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises

1
Department of Management, College of Business Administration, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Business Administration, College of Business, King Khalid University, Abha 62552, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2586; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062586
Submission received: 9 February 2024 / Revised: 16 March 2024 / Accepted: 17 March 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supply Chain Performance Measurement in Industry 4.0)

Abstract

Previous research has identified metrics that are applicable to both lean and agile strategies and has hypothesised that financial and efficiency metrics are more relevant to the lean supply chain strategy, while customer service and flexibility metrics are more relevant to the agile supply chain strategy. These metrics need to be assessed empirically to confirm their relevance and validate these hypotheses. Drawing upon contingency theory, which mandates that supply chain performance metrics should vary based on the supply chain strategy, the research methodology resulted in developing a survey instrument that has been subsequently tested in 45 large enterprises and analysed by Partial Least Square-Path Modelling using XLSTAT software v.2020.4. The results support the existing beliefs and suggest that financial and efficiency indicator sets are more applicable to the lean supply chain strategy, whereas customer service and flexibility indicator sets are more pertinent to the agile supply chain strategy. This research distinguishes itself, through its novelty, in validating an adaptable framework for supply chain performance metrics, acknowledging the necessity of developing a suitable supply chain performance system. Ultimately, the findings of this research might serve as an initial foundation for practitioners in shaping the design of supply chain performance systems since the strong relationship between SC strategies and specific metrics may serve as a strategic approach to evaluate and improve performance.
Keywords: performance metrics; lean SC strategy; agile SC strategy; PLS-PM method; strategy performance metrics; lean SC strategy; agile SC strategy; PLS-PM method; strategy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahinine, B.; Laghouag, A.; Bensahel, W.; Alsolamy, M.; Guendouz, T. Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062586

AMA Style

Dahinine B, Laghouag A, Bensahel W, Alsolamy M, Guendouz T. Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises. Sustainability. 2024; 16(6):2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahinine, Benameur, Abderrazak Laghouag, Wassila Bensahel, Majed Alsolamy, and Tarek Guendouz. 2024. "Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises" Sustainability 16, no. 6: 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062586

APA Style

Dahinine, B., Laghouag, A., Bensahel, W., Alsolamy, M., & Guendouz, T. (2024). Evaluating Performance Measurement Metrics for Lean and Agile Supply Chain Strategies in Large Enterprises. Sustainability, 16(6), 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop