Next Article in Journal
Impact of Bioethanol Concentration in Gasoline on SI Engine Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal and Spatial Trends in Livestock Manure Discharge and Water Pollution Risk in Chaohu Lake Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Performance Assessment of Aerogel Application in Additive Construction of Energy-Efficient Buildings

Laboratory of Protected and Modular Structures, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2398; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062398
Submission received: 14 December 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2024 / Accepted: 29 February 2024 / Published: 14 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The main development direction of energy efficiency technologies in construction is the creation of various materials with complex structures and unique strength, thermal properties, and other properties. The aerogel is a material with high porosity and excellent thermal insulation properties. This paper provides state-of-the-art aerogel applications for the additive manufacturing of energy-efficient buildings. This work provides the experimental and numerical assessment results of the thermal conductivity of aerogel-enhanced blanket, the experimental assessment results of thermal performance of aerogel-enhanced building structure, the experimental assessment results of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component of the concrete mixture to printing buildings, and the experimental assessment results of the aerogel application as a parget powder component. Experimental results show the effect of aerogel powder component application: thermal conductivity decreased by 25%.

1. Introduction

Additive building manufacturing is a process of building parts based on creating a physical object from an electronic model by adding material, typically layer by layer. Additive technologies are widely used to construct buildings and structures [1].
A significant part of the world’s energy consumption is spent on building maintenance. Therefore, the energy efficiency of the buildings has become a key priority for solving energy-saving issues. Additive technology improves the quality and reliability of a construction structure by excluding human errors, significantly reducing the cost of constructing buildings with unique architecture [2,3]. The thermal properties of 3D printing enclosed structures have a significant impact on the energy efficiency of buildings. The research of thermal behavior and the development of solutions for increasing the energy efficiency of enclosing structures created using additive technologies are necessary to reduce energy costs consumed for heating and cooling buildings and improve the quality of the building’s internal environment [4].
The building envelope constructed by additive technology is classified according to the purpose, the character of static work, the homogeneity of the material, the placement of insulation in the cavities of the structure, the sequence of insulation placement, the material, reinforcement, and the presence of a rigidity diaphragm [5].
According to the purpose, structures are divided into external ones that protect the premises from natural climatic conditions, and internal ones that meet the objective’s constructive and ecological, sanitary, and hygienic operational, aesthetic, and economic requirements. According to the character of static work, the structures can be classified as load-bearing, self-supporting, and non-load-bearing, performing the role of partitions in the room. The additive building structure can be classified as homogeneous (made of one material) and non-homogeneous (composed of several materials). Non-homogeneous walls can have partial filling and consist, not only of one material, but also can have closed air cavities. The enclosing structure can be divided into a frame and an inner filling.
The thermal insulation materials used for the additive exterior wall are polystyrene foam, extruded polystyrene foam, urethane foam, mineral wool, liquid thermal insulation, and aerogel materials. The aerogel is rarely used as a thermal insulation material in additive building constructions [6].
An aerogel is a nano-porous insulation material with unique properties such as extremely low thermal conductivity, superior flexibility, compression resistance, and the most promising superinsulation systems. The thermal conductivity of thermal insulation materials is one of the most important parameters for increasing the energy efficiency of buildings. Aerogels consist of globules, several nanometers in size, interconnected by an extensive mesoporous network filled with air [7]. The pore size exceeds the size of the clusters themselves by ten or more times (Figure 1). The aerogel is a nanostructured material with high porosity and excellent thermal insulation properties [8,9]. A significant disadvantage is the high cost of manufacturing and application.
Nevertheless, studies of thermophysical properties and properties of aerogel materials have been relevant research topics in the last few years. Testing and developing these insulation materials are very important for manufacturers and designers. Therefore, studies of thermal properties are extremely important [8].
The applications of aerogels can be used as aerogel granules, powder, and aerogel blankets (Figure 2).
Aerogel blankets are a based innovative insulation material based on silica aerogel produced from fiberglass (Figure 3).
The study [12] investigated the thermal properties of aerogel blankets. The paper obtained the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of aerogel blanket samples in the range from 0 to 65 °C and established a change of about 18%. The thermal conductivity and temperature effect were investigated on the change in specific heat from 0 to 65 °C. Thermal conductivity and heat transfer are obtained based on the measured thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity. The study’s results showed that the thickness could have a negligible effect on thermal conductivity.
The paper [13] presents a theoretical and experimental study of the thermal conductivity of aerogel blankets. The authors presented a model that considers all the heat transfer mechanisms. The authors carried out an analytical calculation of the change in thermal conductivity depending on temperature; the model was verified with experimental data. The parametric studies used the proposed model to evaluate the effect of the total porosity and thermal conductivity of fibers on the effective thermal conductivity of an aerogel blanket.
The research [14,15,16] reported the results of thermal conductivity behavior of aerogel-enhanced blankets. The research [14,15,16] presented comparative thermal characterization results of aerogel blankets and established the thermal conductivity as 0.013 W/(m K). The research [14,15,16] developed and presented some new aerogel-enhanced blankets.
The study [17] presents research of two types of aerogel blanket: with a fiberglass web and with a polyethylene terephthalate fiber web. The calculations showed that aerogel coatings have low thermal conductivity (0.015 W m−1 K−1) and hydrophobic properties [17].
The aerogel blanket has a wide range of applications in construction [18]:
  • Insulation of building facades to reduce cold bridge and energy costs;
  • Noise insulation of internal walls. The speed is up to 70 m/s (the minimum speed of sound propagation through the material), so it acts as a sound insulation system, and its minimum thickness allows for increasing the saleable area;
  • Insulation of internal walls. Due to the small thickness of the material, it is suitable for cladding any internal walls, partitions, and corners, for local elimination of freezing, and for preventing condensation and the appearance of mold;
  • Thermal insulation of the floors;
  • Insulation of window and door openings;
  • Thermal insulation of saunas and baths;
  • Thermal insulation of pipes, etc.
Aerogel powder and granules are also used as components of insulation solutions and building materials (Figure 4). Concrete has a high thermal conductivity ranging from 1.7 to 2.5 W/(m·K). Therefore, it requires insulation layers for standard insulating properties. Hence, building mixtures and concrete with aerogel powder or granules are being developed, which ensure sufficient compressive strength and good thermal insulation. As the amount of aerogel in the mixture increases, the thermal conductivity decreases linearly [19].
The study [19] presented the experimental results of the thermal performance of aerogel granules in the cavity of double-glazing units. The results indicate that the aerogel granules’ particle size influences the glazing unit’s optical and thermal properties. Compared to standard double-glazing, double-glazed windows with large aerogel granules (particle size 3–5 mm) achieve a 58% reduction in heat loss and a 38% decrease in light transmittance. For a glazing unit with aerogel granules (particle size < 0.5 mm), the reduction amounts to 63% in heat loss but as much as 81% in light transmittance.
This study has developed a synthesis method for silica powders and granules. The process involves the direct hydrophobization of silica aerogel in a diluted organic solution of trimethylchlorosilane, which acts as the phase separation inducer, followed by subsequent drying at atmospheric pressure. This approach allows for the collection and drying of gels at atmospheric pressure without the need for the solvent replacement phase typical in traditional methods. The silica aerogel in the form of powder and granules, obtained by the above method, has a specific surface area of up to 756.0 m2/g, thermal conductivity of up to 0.0164 W/(m·K), and a variable density from 47.6 to 120.0 mg/cm3. Overall, the proposed method represents a simple and economical technique to produce high-quality silica aerogel powders and granules. The obtained aerogels could be applicable in thermal insulation, environmental restoration, adsorption, and other areas [20,21].
In study [22] the impact of aerogel granule size on the solar light transmittance coefficient was investigated. The energy characteristics of the glazing system with different sizes of aerogel granules and different filler thicknesses were evaluated under various climatic conditions. The study [22] revealed that using aerogel granules with a diameter of 1 mm and a layer thickness of 16 mm can reduce heat losses by 22% when facing the horizon and 10% when facing east or west in hot summer and cold winter conditions. The results also showed that using aerogel granules can reduce the increase in heat by 17.36% throughout the year in climatic conditions with a hot summer and warm winter. It was also noted that changing the size of aerogel granules and the filler’s thickness does not significantly change the energy characteristics of the aerogel glazing system when facing north.
The research [23] studied the thermal properties of paraffin-impregnated burnt clay aggregate (PIA) concrete. Paraffin was used as a phase change material (PCM) carrier and was incorporated into the burnt clay aggregates using heat and pressure. The compressive and flexural strengths of the concretes and the thermal insulation of the concrete panels were tested. The results of these tests revealed that the strengths and thermal insulation of the standard burnt clay aggregate concrete were improved using PIA. The panels with PIA required more time to reach peak temperature and exhibited a larger drop in peak temperature relative to the control panel without PIA.
The paper [24] examines experimentally and numerically the effectiveness of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) and a new type of hybrid sandwich insulated panel (SIP) at improving the thermal comfort of four case study houses built in Thailand.
The research [25] presents an experimental thermal study of a new PCM-concrete thermal storage block (PCM-CTSB). The experimental results show that PCM-CLSC aggregate has good absorption and compatibility. The thermal conductivity and compressive strength of PCM-concrete thermal storage blocks decreased with the increase of PCM weight percentage.
A literature review showed insufficient experimental and numerical data and research on the aerogel application for the additive manufacturing of energy-efficient buildings. In this paper an experimental and numerical assessment of the thermal performance of aerogel-enhanced building structure is presented. The granules can be used as backfill insulation in additive wall cavities. They can be used to make a powder. Due to the fact that the use of granules is not economically feasible, this option is not considered in this article.
This study aimed to assess the aerogel application in additive construction of energy-efficient buildings. The objectives of the study are as follows:
  • Experimentally estimate the thermal conductivity properties of aerogel-enhanced materials;
  • Evaluate the impact of aerogel blanket materials on energy consumption in additives;
  • Experimental assessment of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component and the thermal conductivity assessment of the concrete samples with and without aerogel application.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Aerogel-Enhanced Blanket Applications for Thermal Insulation Building Envelope

2.1.1. The Experimental Assessment of Thermal Conductivity of a Aerogel-Enhanced Blanket

This study provides determination of the thermal conductivity of the aerogel-based material and comparison of the obtained value with the value provided by the manufacturer. Figure 1 shows the samples of the aerogel-enhanced blanket.
Aerogel has similar mechanical properties (flexibility, etc.) to other blanket heat-insulating materials. And the aerogel has the same scope of application as the mineral wool blanket.
The thermal conductivity of the aerogel samples was measured by the heat flow meter equipment PIT-2.1 (LLC “IzTech”, Moscow, Russia) (Figure 5). The Alison Aerogel Blanket of the DRT06 series (TIM Company, St. Petersburg, Russia) material was applied to the experimental assessment of thermal conductivity. The technical thermal conductivity of the material is λ = 0.0220 W/(m·K). The dimensions of the sample are 250 mm × 250 mm. The technical thickness of material is 10 mm.
The samples’ actual thickness differs from the manufacturer’s declared information. The actual thickness of the aerogel blanket was measured. Figure 6 shows the aerogel sample scheme of the thickness measuring points.
The estimation results of aerogel-blanket sample thickness are presented at Table 1.
To experimentally assess the thermal conductivity of the aerogel-blanket sample, the thermal conductivity meter ITP-MG4 “250” (Manufacturer: STROYPRIBOR, Moscow, Russia) is applied. The average inside temperatures of the aerogel-blanket samples is equal to 10 °C and 25 °C. Figure 7 presents the experimental assessment results of the thermal conductivity of the aerogel-blanket sample.
According to the experimental results, the average thermal conductivity is equal to 0.0227 W/(m·K). The thermal conductivity differs from the manufacturing value (λ = 0.0220 W/(m·K)) by 3%. Table 2 contains the average thermal conductivity values from the tests’ results.
Figure 8 presents the thermal conductivity dependence on temperature.

2.1.2. Experimental Assessment of the Thermal Performance of Aerogel Blanket Application in Additive Construction of Energy-Efficient Buildings

Aerogel blankets are promising materials for construction applications as insulation for walls, ceilings and floors, and ventilation systems. Aerogel blankets are also used for insulation of pipelines at industrial facilities, where, in addition to high thermal insulation, they are also required to resist chemical influences and humidity.
For the experimental assessment of the thermal performance of aerogel-enhanced building structures, samples are produced using additive technologies (Figure 9).
The sample measures are equal to 390 mm × 680 mm × 310 mm. For experimental assessment the rolled heat-insulating aerogel (Alison Aerogel Blanket of the DRT06-Z series) is applied. The rolled heat-insulating aerogel has a technical characteristic: the temperature range application is −170–1000 °C; the thermal conductivity is 0.020 W/(m·K); the thickness is 10 mm. Figure 10 shows the aerogel-blanket thermal insulation material located inside of the additive structure.
The temperature difference on the two sides of the test wall fragment was created using two climate chambers. The sample was placed between the chambers. One camera simulated the outside temperature. The second chamber simulated the inside temperature. The temperature in both chambers was constant and did not depend on the temperature of the surrounding laboratory room. The outdoor temperature produced by climatic chamber TX-500 was equal to −24 °C. The internal temperature produced by climatic chamber SM 5/100-500 was equal to +22 °C. The internal space size of the climatic chamber TX-500 was equal to 700 mm × 1000 mm × 700 mm. The inner space size of the climatic chamber CM 5/100-500 is equal to 700 mm × 895 mm × 800 mm. The negative outside space of the additive structure is additionally insulated (Figure 11).
The dimensional parameters of the aerogel-enhanced additive structure sample are equal to 390 mm × 680 mm × 310 mm. The sample has a position between climate chambers. The hot climate chamber temperature is installed at +22 °C, the cold climate chamber temperature is installed at −24 °C. The chamber temperature varied for 120 h (7200 min). Figure 12 shows the temperature sensor’s points location:
  • Temperature sensor’s points AD1D3, AD3D3, AD4D3 have a position at the outer surface sample from the cold chamber side;
  • Temperature sensor’s points AD1D2, AD3D2, AD4D2 have a position at the triangular cavities inside sample on the insulated surface;
  • Temperature sensor’s points AD5D2, AD6D2 have a position at the outer surface sample from the hot chamber side;
  • Temperature sensor’s points AD5D3, AD6D3 have a position at the triangular cavities inside sample on the not insulated surface.

2.2. The Aerogel-Enhanced Application as Mixture Powder Component of the Concrete Mixture for Printing Building

Aerogel powder is usually used as an additive to various mixtures and materials to enhance their thermal insulation properties. For example, aerogel powder can be added to concrete, plasters, and composite materials, providing a high level of thermal insulation without a significant increase in mass. It is also widely used in research to create new materials with improved properties.
This subsection produced an experimental assessment of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component of the concrete mixture to the insulating concrete properties.
For the experimental assessment of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component, the thermal conductivity assessment of the concrete samples with and without aerogel application was provided.
To concretize the samples, formwork with dimensions 25 × 25 ×3 cm was applied. The volume of the sample V is equal (0.25)2 × 0.03 = 0.001875 m3 = 1.875 L. The following parameters were used to create the concrete mix: 1 kg mixture consumption per 0.14 L equals 140 mL (g) water, and the volumetric flow rate of the mixture is assumed to be 19.5 kg per 0.01 m3 equals 10 L.
Table 3 presents the mixture parameters of concrete samples without aerogel.
Table 4 presents the mixture parameters of concrete samples with an aerogel of 15%.
The concrete samples were produced by plexiglass formwork to measure the thermal resistance coefficient of materials. The samples had been made in a plate form with dimensions 250 × 250 × 30 mm.
Measurements of the thermal resistance coefficient were conducted using a thermal conductivity meter. The requirements of surface quality and thickness are achieving high measurement accuracy. The sample surface was flat and smooth, without irregularities, shells, cavities, and fractures. Figure 13 shows the concreting sample processes.
Concrete plate samples were kept in a humid environment for 7 days to achieve 80% strength gain. The samples were dried for 48 h at a temperature of 105 °C.
Table 5 presents the thermal conductivity measurement results.
The sample thickness was measured by a caliper. Table 6 shows the measurement thickness results.
The effect of aerogel application as a parget powder component on the thermal conductivity of the structure is investigated.
Six samples were produced with the size 250 × 250 × 20 mm to study the effect of aerogel application as a parget powder component on the thermal conductivity of the structure. Aerogel-blanket material had been added to the 3 gypsum plaster samples. Gypsum plaster had been produced with a constant volumetric water-binding ratio. Table 7 shows information about the components’ proportions of the samples.
Aerogel granules were produced into powders of 10–200 microns. Figure 14a shows aerogel in the granules state, and Figure 14b shows aerogel in the powder state.
There is a dry mixing process of aerogel powder and dry plaster mixture. The mixture is poured into six plastic forms and vibrated for 3–5 min to ensure sealing and avoid delamination. The thermal conductivity characteristics of the samples were measured by thermal conductivity equipment (PIT 2.1) at a temperature of 25 °C. Figure 15 shows the samples’ thicknesses determined at eight points.
The samples thicknesses measurement is presented at Table 8.

2.3. Numerical Approach

Computational fluid dynamics methods are employed for numerical work. Both Navier–Stokes equations for convective heat transfer and Fourier heat equation for conductive heat transfer are solved conjugately with the finite volume method. A hybrid mesh for both solid and fluid computational domains is constructed, and the mesh size is approximately 4.95 M nodes and 4.5 M elements. The mesh is mostly hexahedral (99.2% of elements, 0.8% of elements degenerate into wedges).
Convection is assumed to be laminar and modelled by Boussinesq approximation with a standard g value of 9.81 m/s2. Other material properties are presented in Table 9.
There are several boundary conditions: firstly, adiabatic wall boundary conditions for side walls (Figure 16, purple lines), external (blue line) and internal (red line) convective heat transfer, and fluid-solid heat transfer (thin black lines). The concrete area is painted grey, and air/aerogel area is painted light blue colors.
The internal heat transfer temperature is 22 °C, and the external heat transfer temperature is −24 °C. Heat transfer coefficients for both of the zones are 3 W/(m2 ∗ K). Heat transfer coefficients are conducted with Churchill and Chu approximation for natural convection on vertical plate.
ANSYS CFX finite-volume solver is employed to get the solution for different cases.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Measurement Results of Thermal Performance of Aerogel-Enhanced Building Structure

3.1.1. Experimental Results of Thermal Performance of Aerogel-Enhanced Building Structure

This work analyses the thermal behavior of the structure with different aerogel thicknesses. For the first day, the inside temperature sample decreased by 3 °C in both chambers’ period function. On the second day, the cold chamber was turned off, and the sample gained heat for 24 h and gradually returned to its original state. On the third day, the cold chamber was turned on, and there were sharp drop temperature curves to −22 ° C. For the fourth day, the cold chamber had been turned off. On the fifth day, it had been turned on again.
Figure 17 shows the temperature distribution of the structure with an aerogel thickness of 100 mm.
Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2, Interpribor, Chelyabinsk, Russia) is shown in Table 10.
Figure 18 shows the cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time.
There was a sharp temperature drop (sensor AD4D2) for 555 min, which amounted to 2.77 °C by the thickness of aerogel material 100 mm. After 555 min, there was a slow temperature drop (Table 11).
The temperature distribution of the structure with aerogel thickness 30 mm is presents at Figure 19.
Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2) is shown in Table 12.
Cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time is shown at Figure 20.
There was a sharp temperature drop (sensor AD4D2) for 975 min, which amounted to 6.72 °C by thickness aerogel material of 30 mm. After this 555 min, there is a slow temperature drop (Table 13).

3.1.2. Numerical Assessment Results on the Thermal Performance of Aerogel-Enhanced Building Structure

A building envelope with aerogel thermal insulation by additive technologies was developed. The sample has parameters 390 × 680 × 310 mm (Figure 21).
It is economically unprofitable to fill all the sample cavities with aerogel insulation material because of expensive aerogel-based material costs. Based on numerical modeling results of the dew point (Figure 22), it is efficient to fill the sample part of the internal room space with the aerogel-based material. The dew point is located inside the insulation, and it does not condense indoors and in the dry building structure.
The calculations were carried out using bench test conditions for numerical modelling of the building envelope. There are three-dimensional models of the enclosing structure and the corresponding calculation grid. The model considers thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer inside air cavities. The boundary conditions are identical (temperature insulation fields at the boundaries of the enclosing structure). The models differ by the material in the rectangular cavity: (1) the cavity had been filled by the air, (2) the cavity had been filled by aerogel. The Navier–Stokes equations and the heat equation of the model are solved by the finite-volume method.
The comparison criterion is the temperature isoline of the dew point at 50% humidity for the internal room temperature. The aerogel application at the building structure increases the heat transmission coefficient. The heat transmission coefficient of the structure without insulation is U = 1.18, and for an aerogel-enhanced structure, the heat transmission coefficient is U = 0.53.

3.2. Measurement Results of Thermal Performance of the Aerogel-Enhanced Application as Mixture Powder Component of the Concrete Mixture for Printing Building

Aerogel powder is usually used as an additive to various mixtures and materials to enhance their thermal insulation properties. For example, aerogel powder can be added to concrete, plasters, and composite materials, providing a high level of thermal insulation without a significant increase in mass. It is also widely used in research to create new materials with improved properties.
This subsection produced an experimental assessment of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component of the concrete mixture to the insulating concrete properties.
The thermal conductivity measurement results are presented in Table 14.
Table 14 presents the thermal conductivity measurement results of samples without aerogel material.
Figure 23 shows the thermal conductivity measurement results of samples with and without aerogel material.
Experimental and numerical results show that the aerogel blanket application at the building structure increases the heat transmission coefficient. The heat transmission coefficient of the structure without insulation is U = 1.18. For the aerogel-enhanced structure, the heat transmission coefficient is U = 0.53. Experimental results show the effect of aerogel powder component application: thermal conductivity decreased by 25%.
The energy efficiency of additive enclosing walls depends on the configuration of the structure and the thermal insulation materials.
The studies [9,13,17,26] reported similar results. According to the research results, using an aerogel blanket reduces thermal resistance and increases the energy efficiency of building enclosing structures. Based on the measured thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity and heat transfer are obtained.
The studies’ [17,27,28] results showed that the thickness can have only a negligible effect on thermal conductivity.
The authors of studies [19,20,21,22] determined that adding aerogel powder and aerogel granules can increase the thermal resistance of structures. The impact of aerogel granule size on the solar light transmittance coefficient was investigated. The study revealed that using aerogel granules with a diameter of 1 mm and a layer thickness of 16 mm can reduce heat losses by 22% when facing the horizon and 10% when facing east or west in hot summer and cold winter conditions [29].
The advantage of this material over other insulating materials is that it increases the thermal resistance of opaque surfaces with an application. Aerogels have the lowest thermal conductivity of any known solid, making them excellent insulators. Despite their strong insulation capabilities, aerogel is lightweight and flexible, making it easy to install and suitable for various applications [30]. Some disadvantages include high cost and fragility due to its negligible tensile strength despite its relatively high compressive strength.
Aerogel blankets are porous materials that have high thermal insulation properties. Aerogel blankets are promising materials for construction applications as insulation for walls, ceilings and floors, and ventilation systems. Aerogel blankets are also used for insulation of pipelines at industrial facilities, where, in addition to high thermal insulation, they are also required to resist chemical influences and humidity [31,32].
Aerogel powder is usually used as an additive to various mixtures and materials to enhance their thermal insulation properties. For example, aerogel powder can be added to concrete, plasters, and composite materials, providing a high level of thermal insulation without a significant increase in mass. It is also widely used in research to create new materials with improved properties [33,34].
Aerogel granule is often used in thermal building panels because it can be easily injected between layers to create a lightweight heat insulator. Based on the size of the granules, aerogel can significantly affect the thermal and optical properties of a double-glazed window, building structure, etc. The application of the aerogel form (blanket, powder, or granules) depends on the specific requirements of the application and design tasks [35,36].

4. Conclusions

The energy efficiency of additive enclosing walls depends on the configuration of the structure and the thermal insulation materials. This work presented numerical and experimental results of the thermal performance of aerogel-enhanced additive building structures for energy efficiency. The conclusions based on detailed analyses can be drawn as follows:
  • The thermal conductivity properties of aerogel-enhanced materials were estimated by experiments. The thermal conductivity differs from the value provided by the manufacturer (λ = 0.0220 W/(m·K)) by 3% (this is the stated instrument error). The actual value of the thermal conductivity of the material has been obtained λ = 0.0227 W/(m·K).
  • The impact of aerogel blanket materials on energy consumption in additive building was estimated experimentally and numerically. The comparison criterion was the temperature isoline corresponding to the moisture dew point value for 50% humidity for the room’s internal temperature. Experimental and numerical results show that the aerogel blanket application at the additive building structure increases the heat transmission coefficient. The heat transmission coefficient of the structure without insulation is U = 1.18, and for an aerogel-enhanced structure, the heat transmission coefficient is U = 0.53.
  • Aerogel powder is usually used as an additive to various mixtures and materials to enhance their thermal insulation properties. Experimental assessment of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component of the concrete mixture to the insulating concrete properties has been produced in this work. The thermal conductivity assessment of the concrete samples with and without aerogel application was provided for the experimental evaluation of the aerogel application as a mixture powder component. Experimental results show the effect of aerogel powder component application (15%): thermal conductivity decreased by 25%. Further laboratory studies on a larger number of samples are necessary to assess the effect of the aerogel additive on the thermal conductivity of concrete.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.N. and V.S.; methodology, A.D.; software, E.V.K.; validation, E.V.K., V.S. and T.K.; formal analysis, D.A. and A.D.; investigation, A.D.; resources, V.S.; data curation, D.N.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.; writing—review and editing, T.K.; visualization, T.K.; supervision, V.S. and D.N.; project administration, D.N.; funding acquisition, D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation under grant 21-79-10283, date 29 July 2021, https://rscf.ru/project/21-79-10283/ (accessed on 5 June 2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Amran, M.; Abdelgader, H.S.; Onaizi, A.M.; Fediuk, R.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Rashid, R.S.M.; Murali, G. 3D-printable alkali-activated concretes for building applications: A critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 319, 126126. Available online: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061821038587 (accessed on 13 January 2022). [CrossRef]
  2. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Song, Y. 3D printing in construction: State of the art and applications. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 115, 1329–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alkhalidi, A.; Hatuqay, D. Energy efficient 3D printed buildings: Material and techniques selection worldwide study. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 30, 101286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nazarian, S.; Duarte, J.P.; Bilén, S.G.; Memari, A.; Radlinska, A.; Meisel, N.; Hojati, M. Additive Manufacturing of Architectural Structures: An Interplay Between Materials, Systems, and Design. Adv. Sci. Technol. Innov. 2021, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, H. Energy-saving potential of 3D printed concrete building with integrated living wall. Energy Build. 2020, 222, 110110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adhikary, S.K.; Ashish, D.K.; Rudžionis, Ž. Aerogel based thermal insulating cementitious composites: A review. Energy Build. 2021, 245, 111058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Y.; Niu, J.L. Energy and visual performance of the silica aerogel glazing system in commercial buildings of Hong Kong. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 94, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koebel, M.; Rigacci, A.; Achard, P. Aerogel-based thermal superinsulation: An overview. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2012, 63, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baetens, R.; Jelle, B.P.; Gustavsen, A. Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mazrouei-Sebdan, Z.; Begum, H.; Schoenwald, S.; Horoshenkov, K.; Malfait, W. A review on silica aerogel-based materials for acoustic applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2023, 562, 120770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huber, L.; Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Vares, S.; Koebel, M.M. Fast and Minimal-Solvent Production of Superinsulating Silica Aerogel Granulate. Angew. Chem. Int. 2023, 56, 4753–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lakatos, Á. Stability investigations of the thermal insulating performance of aerogel blanket. Energy Build. 2019, 185, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hoseini, A.; McCague, C.; Andisheh-Tadbir, M.; Bahrami, M. Aerogel blankets: From mathematical modeling to material characterization and experimental analysis. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 2016, 93, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berardi, U. The benefits of using aerogel-enhanced systems in building retrofits. Energy Procedia 2017, 134, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Berardi, U. Aerogel-Enhanced Insulation for Building Applications. In Nanotechnology in Eco-Efficient Construction: Materials, Processes and Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 395–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berardi, U. Aerogel-enhanced systems for building energy retrofits: Insights from a case study. Energy Build. 2018, 159, 370–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nocentini, K.; Achard, P.; Biwole, P. Hygro-thermal properties of silica aerogel blankets dried using microwave heating for building thermal insulation. Energy Build. 2018, 158, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cuce, E.; Cuce, P.M.; Wood, C.J.; Riffat, S.B. Toward aerogel based thermal superinsulation in buildings: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 273–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Buratti, C.; Merli, F.; Moretti, E. Aerogel-based materials for building applications: Influence of granule size on thermal and acoustic performance. Energy Build. 2017, 152, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, R.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhang, X. Phase-separation induced synthesis of superhydrophobic silica aerogel powders and granules. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 279, 120971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Luo, T.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Bao, C. Highly efficient and robust preparation of aerogel granules from nanoparticles and graphene oxide. Mater. Lett. 2020, 276, 128171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, L.; Peng, J.; Zheng, D.; Lu, B. Optical path model and energy performance optimization of aerogel glazing system filled with aerogel granules. Appl. Energy 2023, 334, 120623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pongsopha, P.; Piti, S.; Tanakorn, P.; Thanongsak, I.; Pitthaya, J.; Prinya, C. Use of burnt clay aggregate as phase change material carrier to improve thermal properties of concrete panel. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2019, 11, e00242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Srimuang, K.; Imjai, T.; Kefyalew, F.; Raman, S.N.; Garcia, R.; Chaudhary, S. Thermal and acoustic performance of masonry walls with phase change materials: A comparison of scaled-down houses in tropical climates. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 82, 108315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shen, Y.; Liu, S.; Zeng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Han, X.; Yang, L. Experimental thermal study of a new PCM-concrete thermal storage block (PCM-CTSB). Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 293, 123540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schmidt, M.; Schwertfeger, F. Applications for silica aerogel products. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 225, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smith, D.M.; Maskara, A.; Boes, U. Aerogel-based thermal insulation. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 225, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lakatos, Á.; Csík, A.; Csarnovics, I. Experimental verification of thermal properties of the aerogel blanket. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 25, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, T.; Jelle, B.P.; Ihara, T.; Gustavsen, A. Insulating glazing units with silica aerogel granules: The impact of particle size. Appl. Energy 2014, 128, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aditya, L.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Rismanchi, B.; Ng, H.M.; Hasan, M.H.; Metselaar, H.S.C.; Muraza, O.; Aditiya, H.B. A review on insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 1352–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, H.; Lin, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Han, J.; Cheng, Y. Study on indoor adaptive thermal comfort evaluation method for buildings integrated with semi-transparent photovoltaic window. Build Environ. 2023, 228, 109834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, J.; Cai, J.; Lin, Y.; Sun, Y.; Pan, J. Impact resistance of engineered geopolymer composite (EGC) in cold temperatures. Constr. Build Mater. 2022, 343, 128150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rigaut, C.; Deruyver, L.; Niesen, M.; Vander Ghinst, M.; Goole, J.; Lambert, P.; Haut, B. What Are the Key Anatomical Features for the Success of Nose-to-Brain Delivery? A Study of Powder Deposition in 3D-Printed Nasal Casts. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Ren, X.; Zhu, L.; Li, C. Biomass 3D Printing: Principles, Materials, Post-Processing and Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hedjazi, L.; Belhabib, S.; Stephant, N.; Durand, S.; Guessasma, S. Effects of Microstructural Arrangement on the Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Polyamide. Symmetry 2023, 15, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Antezana, P.E.; Municoy, S.; Ostapchuk, G.; Catalano, P.N.; Hardy, J.G.; Evelson, P.A.; Orive, G.; Desimone, M.F. 4D Printing: The Development of Responsive Materials Using 3D-Printing Technology. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Silica aerogel microstructure and mechanical properties [10]. (A) TEM image [11], (B) SEM image [9].
Figure 1. Silica aerogel microstructure and mechanical properties [10]. (A) TEM image [11], (B) SEM image [9].
Sustainability 16 02398 g001
Figure 2. The types of aerogel application.
Figure 2. The types of aerogel application.
Sustainability 16 02398 g002
Figure 3. The aerogel-enhanced blanket.
Figure 3. The aerogel-enhanced blanket.
Sustainability 16 02398 g003
Figure 4. The different size aerogel granules (A,C) and aerogel powder (B).
Figure 4. The different size aerogel granules (A,C) and aerogel powder (B).
Sustainability 16 02398 g004
Figure 5. Heat flow meter PIT-2.1 (a) and its schematic design (b).
Figure 5. Heat flow meter PIT-2.1 (a) and its schematic design (b).
Sustainability 16 02398 g005
Figure 6. The aerogel sample scheme of the thickness measuring points.
Figure 6. The aerogel sample scheme of the thickness measuring points.
Sustainability 16 02398 g006
Figure 7. Thermal conductivity of the aerogel-blanket samples.
Figure 7. Thermal conductivity of the aerogel-blanket samples.
Sustainability 16 02398 g007
Figure 8. The thermal conductivity dependence from temperature for Alison Aerogel Blanket DRT06 series3 (Alison Aerogel, Guangzhou, China).
Figure 8. The thermal conductivity dependence from temperature for Alison Aerogel Blanket DRT06 series3 (Alison Aerogel, Guangzhou, China).
Sustainability 16 02398 g008
Figure 9. Aerogel-enhanced building envelope by 3D printer.
Figure 9. Aerogel-enhanced building envelope by 3D printer.
Sustainability 16 02398 g009
Figure 10. Additive building structure (a) no insulation (b) with aerogel-blanket insulation material.
Figure 10. Additive building structure (a) no insulation (b) with aerogel-blanket insulation material.
Sustainability 16 02398 g010
Figure 11. Experimental setup of Additive building structure.
Figure 11. Experimental setup of Additive building structure.
Sustainability 16 02398 g011
Figure 12. The aerogel-enhanced building structure sample by additive technologies. The temperature sensor’s point location.
Figure 12. The aerogel-enhanced building structure sample by additive technologies. The temperature sensor’s point location.
Sustainability 16 02398 g012
Figure 13. The concreting sample processes.
Figure 13. The concreting sample processes.
Sustainability 16 02398 g013
Figure 14. Aerogel (a) at the granules state (b) at the powder state.
Figure 14. Aerogel (a) at the granules state (b) at the powder state.
Sustainability 16 02398 g014
Figure 15. The samples thicknesses scheme.
Figure 15. The samples thicknesses scheme.
Sustainability 16 02398 g015
Figure 16. Boundary conditions for numerical work.
Figure 16. Boundary conditions for numerical work.
Sustainability 16 02398 g016
Figure 17. Temperature distribution inside the structure for 7200 min.
Figure 17. Temperature distribution inside the structure for 7200 min.
Sustainability 16 02398 g017
Figure 18. Cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time.
Figure 18. Cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time.
Sustainability 16 02398 g018
Figure 19. Temperature distribution inside the structure for 7200 min.
Figure 19. Temperature distribution inside the structure for 7200 min.
Sustainability 16 02398 g019
Figure 20. Cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time.
Figure 20. Cooling temperature profile of the additive building structure for the time.
Sustainability 16 02398 g020
Figure 21. Aerogel Insulated Additive Manufacturing Structure.
Figure 21. Aerogel Insulated Additive Manufacturing Structure.
Sustainability 16 02398 g021
Figure 22. Temperature distribution for additive design (a) without aerogel (b) with aerogel.
Figure 22. Temperature distribution for additive design (a) without aerogel (b) with aerogel.
Sustainability 16 02398 g022
Figure 23. The thermal conductivity of the samples without and with aerogel.
Figure 23. The thermal conductivity of the samples without and with aerogel.
Sustainability 16 02398 g023
Table 1. The estimation results of aerogel-blanket sample thickness.
Table 1. The estimation results of aerogel-blanket sample thickness.
No. Samplea1a2a3a4a5a6a7a8a9a10a11a12Avg.
Value
111.311.110.811.211.211.010.810.911.110.611.210.911.0
211.411.511.811.611.811.811.611.311.811.811.711.111.6
311.511.411.411.411.611.511.411.311.511.511.611.411.5
411.511.511.411.411.711.511.611.311.611.711.711.711.6
511.611.611.411.511.711.511.711.511.611.711.711.711.7
Table 2. Measurement of thermal conductivity of an aerogel-based material.
Table 2. Measurement of thermal conductivity of an aerogel-based material.
Average Temperature
of the Sample, °C
Thermal Conductivity,
λ, W/m·°C
100.019
250.020
1250.025
3000.039
Table 3. The mixture parameters of concrete samples without aerogel.
Table 3. The mixture parameters of concrete samples without aerogel.
Dry Mix, kgWater, LVolume, LComment
19.5 19.5 × 0.14 = 2.73 10 Manufacturer data
1.950.2731Specific
3.660.5121.8751 form
7.321.0243.752 forms
Table 4. The mixture parameters of concrete samples with aerogel of 15%.
Table 4. The mixture parameters of concrete samples with aerogel of 15%.
Dry Mix, kgWater, LAerogel, LVolume, LComment
1.660.2320.151.0Specific
3.110.4350.2811.8751 form
6.220.8700.5623.752 forms
6.8420.9570.6184.1252 forms + 10% assurances
6.8421.0570.6184.225+100 mL of water
Table 5. The thermal conductivity coefficient of concrete samples.
Table 5. The thermal conductivity coefficient of concrete samples.
NoSample TypeSample Thickness, mmThe Thermal Conductivity Coefficient λ , W t m K
1with aerogel30.10.917
2with aerogel29.81.11
3without aerogel30.21.5
4without aerogel30.11.22
Table 6. Thickness of concrete samples.
Table 6. Thickness of concrete samples.
No t 1 t 2 t 3 t 4 t 5 t 6 t 7 t 8 t c p t
130.329.7529.929.730.330.330.230.230.136.8
229.0528.830.030.030.130.130.2530.129.836.5
330.030.529.6530.0530.030.8530.630.230.236.9
429.6530.6530.230.230.0530.130.030.130.136.8
Table 7. Powder component’s proportion.
Table 7. Powder component’s proportion.
NoComponentUnitValue15%
1Dry plaster mixture by gypsum binderkg/L2.25/3.11.91/2.635
2Aerogel (Alison Aerogel Blanket)L-0.5/0.465
3Waterkg/L1.46/1.461.46/1.46
Water-binding ratio-0.65
Table 8. The samples thicknesses measurement.
Table 8. The samples thicknesses measurement.
Noh1, mmh2, mmh3, mmh4, mmh5, mmh6, mmh7, mmh8, mmhavrg, mm
130.130.230.330.229.830.329.930.130.1
230.130.230.330.229.830.329.930.130.1
330.130.230.330.229.830.329.930.130.1
430.430.530.330.630.430.430.730.630.5
530.430.530.330.630.430.430.730.630.5
630.430.530.330.630.430.430.730.630.5
Table 9. Material properties.
Table 9. Material properties.
MaterialDensitySpecific HeatThermal ConductivityDynamic Viscosity
rho, kg/m3Cp, kJ/(kg ∗ K)lambda, W/(m ∗ K)mu, Pa ∗ s
airBoussinesq1.0040.0261.83 × 10−5
concrete19001.130.7-
aerogel20010.021-
Table 10. Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2).
Table 10. Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2).
1 Day2 Days3 Days4 Days5 Days
Temperature reduction−3.5 °C −6 °C −5 °C
Temperature increase +5 °C +5 °C
Table 11. Temperature distribution of building structure sample for the first 555 min.
Table 11. Temperature distribution of building structure sample for the first 555 min.
Time, minAD3D3AD4D2AD5D3AD5D2
017.2717.4717.7318.19
158.3517.8319.3720.16
302.7417.9319.7121.28
60−4.8918.1120.4221.47
120−14.9218.2820.8521.54
240−22.1517.2120.9721.55
360−23.1615.4520.8621.48
555−22.9614.720.721.41
Coordinate, mm0170355390
Table 12. Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2).
Table 12. Temperature distribution on the inner surfaces (sensor AD4D2).
1 Day2 Day3 Day4 Day5 Day
Temperature reduction−6.5 °C −7 °C −6.7 °C
Temperature rise +7.5 °C +5.5 °C
Table 13. Temperature distribution of building structure sample for the first 975 min.
Table 13. Temperature distribution of building structure sample for the first 975 min.
Time, minAD3D3AD4D2AD5D3AD5D2
019.5520.0520.5421.15
15−1.6520.2920.9821.38
30−5.820.2420.9121.51
60−11.2319.9121.0221.47
120−17.3819.0121.0621.41
240−20.8416.9520.8521.3
360−21.4815.4720.5521.19
975−21.9713.3319.9620.96
Coordinate, mm0170355390
Table 14. The thermal conductivity coefficient of concrete samples.
Table 14. The thermal conductivity coefficient of concrete samples.
NoSample TypeSample Thickness, mmThe Thermal Conductivity Coefficient λ , W t m · K
1with aerogel30.10.917
2with aerogel29.81.11
3without aerogel30.21.5
4without aerogel30.11.22
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kotov, E.V.; Nemova, D.; Sergeev, V.; Dontsova, A.; Koriakovtseva, T.; Andreeva, D. Thermal Performance Assessment of Aerogel Application in Additive Construction of Energy-Efficient Buildings. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062398

AMA Style

Kotov EV, Nemova D, Sergeev V, Dontsova A, Koriakovtseva T, Andreeva D. Thermal Performance Assessment of Aerogel Application in Additive Construction of Energy-Efficient Buildings. Sustainability. 2024; 16(6):2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kotov, Evgeny Vladimirovich, Darya Nemova, Vitaly Sergeev, Anna Dontsova, Tatyana Koriakovtseva, and Darya Andreeva. 2024. "Thermal Performance Assessment of Aerogel Application in Additive Construction of Energy-Efficient Buildings" Sustainability 16, no. 6: 2398. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop