You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Sustainability
  • Review
  • Open Access

30 January 2024

Enhancing Work Productivity through Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Literature Review

,
and
Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustaining Work and Careers for Human Well-Being in the New Normal

Abstract

In this review, utilizing the PRISMA methodology, a comprehensive analysis of the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) across diverse professional sectors is presented, drawing from 159 selected research publications. This study provides an insightful overview of the impact of GAI on enhancing institutional performance and work productivity, with a specific focus on sectors including academia, research, technology, communications, agriculture, government, and business. It highlights the critical role of GAI in navigating AI challenges, ethical considerations, and the importance of analytical thinking in these domains. The research conducts a detailed content analysis, uncovering significant trends and gaps in current GAI applications and projecting future prospects. A key aspect of this study is the bibliometric analysis, which identifies dominant tools like Chatbots and Conversational Agents, notably ChatGPT, as central to GAI’s evolution. The findings indicate a robust and accelerating trend in GAI research, expected to continue through 2024 and beyond. Additionally, this study points to potential future research directions, emphasizing the need for improved GAI design and strategic long-term planning, particularly in assessing its impact on user experience across various professional fields.

1. Introduction

Over recent decades, we have seen remarkable advancements in science and technology, bringing benefits across various sectors and disciplines. Today, we are immersed in an era defined by revolutionary changes, driven mostly by significant strides in digital technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI). Consequently, experts widely anticipate a growing impact of AI on the economy in the coming years, paralleled by an increasing interest in its diverse applications [1]. This indicates that the world is going through an unprecedented transformation in the field of AI, a field that aims to better serve humanity [2]. Moreover, advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) have notably expanded textual material production techniques in job automation. GAI, particularly through Large Language Models (LLMs), focuses on the autonomous creation of creative content. These LLMs, considered fundamental algorithms, represent a major leap in the field [3]. After OpenAI introduced a free trial of the ChatGPT-3.5 model in 2022, LLMs gained widespread appeal [4]. To elaborate further, OpenAI is at the forefront of the Artificial Intelligence revolution. Its ChatGPT bot has created significant buzz in the tech community. Remarkably, ChatGPT attracted over 100 million monthly active users in just about two and a half months, making it the fastest-growing web application in history [5]. This huge success has led technology companies to accelerate and produce upgrades and new AI-powered products, such as Bard and Claude, to keep up with this rapid technological revolution [6].
According to Feuerriegel et al. [7], the term “generative” in the context of AI refers to an AI system’s capacity to generate new material autonomously, without human involvement. This content, which may be text, image, audio, or video, interacts with specific standards or guidelines [8]. The aim of advancements in Artificial Intelligence is to achieve a level of creativity and innovation that surpasses human capabilities. This goal is evident in how ChatGPT leverages its creative abilities to simplify and add enjoyment to interactions with technology [9]. On the other hand, generative AI is more than just a new technology tool; it is a transformative engine that reshapes not only how we live and work but also expands the horizons, paving the way for limitless possibilities in the workplace environment [10].
More specifically, GAI is used in a variety of disciplines, including healthcare, education, art, environment, etc., where it plays an important role in aiding and accelerating the content production process [11]. According to Mao et al. [12], GAI personalizes learning experiences and creates innovative educational materials. Moreover, Mao et al. [12] claim that this technology allows the creation of new and innovative educational materials based on educational data. In medicine, generative AI helps diagnose diseases and provides healthcare [13]. Additionally, GAI empowers businesses to create effective marketing materials and fosters innovation in the arts and cultural sectors [14]. As a result, GAI extends beyond conventional uses, becoming a key driver of transformation across various industries.
These revolutionary discoveries in the field of Artificial Intelligence, which have occurred in many industries and disciplines, are seen as a fundamental transformation not only in its impact on the daily lives of individuals but also in its consequences for organizations [15]. This progress underscores the importance of leveraging advanced programs and technologies to enhance and sustain organizational performance. Increasing efficiency has become a universal goal across private, public, and government sectors worldwide. Consequently, corporate executives are now considering integrating this technology into their operations. In this context, the strategic use of GAI in corporate settings is being recognized as a promising solution to enhance work productivity. Moreover, the technical innovations in GAI present a unique approach for businesses to address productivity challenges within organizational frameworks [16]. As a result, companies of all sizes are actively considering the use of AI technology to gain a competitive edge [17]. GAI has the potential to dramatically boost productivity by eliminating mistakes, enhancing decision making, and simplifying challenges [18].
This review delves into applications of GAI in various professional settings, the tools and techniques used, and the effectiveness of GAI in academia, research, engineering, technology, communications, cultural studies, agriculture and agricultural sciences, government, public administration, and business. As such, this study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential of GAI technologies and their use to increase productivity at work in these areas and focuses on analyzing and compiling a range of existing reviews on GAI in the above-mentioned areas. Hence, this paper is a guide for academics, users, and regulators who are keenly interested in researching the revolutionary relationship between GAI and work productivity.
The structure of this review study unfolds as follows: The paper begins with a comprehensive methodology in Section 2, which outlines the systematic literature review process conducted in four stages. This section details the rigorous steps involved in gathering and analyzing the literature on the utilization of GAI to enhance employee productivity in various professional settings. Following the methodology, this study proceeds with a detailed content analysis that explores the fundamental impact of GAI across diverse professional sectors, including academia, engineering, technology, communications, and more. This analysis seeks to discern the transformative role of GAI in these fields, particularly focusing on its capacity to enhance work productivity. Subsequently, a thorough bibliometric analysis is conducted, offering a critical examination of the proliferation and regional distribution of GAI research, as well as insights into key AI tools and interdisciplinary collaborations. The paper ends with a conclusion in Section 5 that synthesizes the key findings, discusses the implications for future research and practice, and provides insights into the prospective trajectory of GAI in enhancing work productivity across various professional disciplines.

2. Methodology

According to Sanjay [19], a systematic literature review is conducted in four stages. This section will therefore discuss the steps followed to gather and analyze the literature on the use of GAI to enhance employee productivity in the modern workplace, as explained below:
  • Literature retrieval—The first and most important step in the data collecting process, this step comprises selecting acceptable search keywords and key phrases to thoroughly gather relevant articles relating to the targeted topic. Pre-existing papers and publications in several areas of employee competency development were collected from the Scopus database. The above process was carried out using a list of keywords, such as “productivity”, “Conversational AI”, “employees”, “Chatbot”, “Generative Artificial Intelligence”, “efficiency”, “workers”, “ChatGPT”, and “GAI”. Thus, authors were able to conduct more targeted research across titles, keywords, and abstracts as a result of these phrase combinations. Over the years 1989 to September 2023, the main data-gathering method resulted in the inclusion of 683 research publications.
  • Literature screening—The PRISMA statement, a well-known and stringent technique for performing systematic reviews and meta-analyses, affected the literature screening procedure in this investigation as indicated in Figure 1. This technique provides an organized structure for ensuring the systematic identification, selection, and evaluation of the relevant literature, hence improving the review process’s accuracy and repeatability [19]. Initially, 683 papers were collected for this study. After removing duplicates, 646 papers remained. Further rigorous review to align with the research scope reduced this to 159 relevant reviews, articles, and publications from 2014 to September 2023.
    Figure 1. Literature screening approach.
Figure 2 visually illustrates the increase in the number of publications related to the topic over this period, and the chronological chart highlights a surge in publications, particularly in 2023. This trend, showing a rapid increase since 2014, correlates with the rise of advanced GAI tools like ChatGPT. This research reflects the recognition of AI’s potential to enhance professional performance, leading to heightened awareness among business leaders, managers, and government agencies about the benefits of integrating AI into their operational activities and organizational frameworks.
Figure 2. The number of articles and publications related to the use of GAI to improve employee productivity (2014–2023).
  • Content analysis—The content analysis process involved a thorough examination and organization of a large body of material, particularly research journals, to identify recurring themes and patterns. This study’s focus was on exploring how GAI enhances staff efficiency, categorizing articles into distinct categories and sub-fields. This systematic classification provided a comprehensive understanding of GAI’s multifaceted impact within organizations, facilitating the extraction of significant findings and insights from the data.
  • Bibliometric analysis—The bibliometric analysis in this study systematically examined the academic literature, focusing on citations and references within articles. Its goal was to enhance understanding of the impact, trends, and connections in academia. By analyzing citation patterns, co-authorship, and keywords, it identified key authors, pivotal publications, emerging research areas, and collaborative networks.
The subsequent sections will therefore methodically carry out both content and bibliometric analyses, adhering closely to the previously outlined methodologies. This structured approach ensures a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the research.

3. Content Analysis

The integration of GAI into professional settings is generating significant interest due to its potential to enhance employee performance. This includes automating tasks, improving data analysis, assisting decision making, and offering customized services, all while reducing errors and operational costs. This section aims to conduct an in-depth content analysis to evaluate GAI’s application in diverse professional areas, thereby shedding light on its impact on workplace productivity.

3.1. Application of GAI in Academia and Research

Taking the lead from chatbots, these technologies have begun to improve organization and communication within the academy, paving the path for new methods to handle assignments more successfully. Hence, this section focuses on a curated collection of research articles that examine the role of GAI in academia and research. As detailed in Table 1, the objective is to assess various aspects of GAI technologies, particularly their impact on productivity enhancement for academics and professionals in these fields.
Table 1. The applications of GAI in academia and research.
The analysis of selected papers offers significant insights into how GAI, especially through chatbots, is transforming academia. These technologies notably boost administrative and informational efficiency in educational environments. Additionally, GAI-driven instructional materials are poised to revolutionize educational content creation, promising resources that are both high-quality and cost-effective. The adaptability of chatbots, particularly in applications involving Natural Language Processing (NLP) and adversarial machine learning, supports innovative teaching methodologies such as the flipped classroom model. However, to effectively integrate chatbots in educational settings, a comprehensive understanding of unique educational demands and challenges is essential.
The research provides important insights into GAI’s application in academic and research settings. However, it also highlights ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI technologies like ChatGPT and NLP in these areas. These concerns emphasize the necessity of addressing ethical challenges to maintain the integrity and productivity of academic and research environments. The research suggests that future studies should focus on identifying and managing these ethical issues to ensure the responsible incorporation of GAI in academia, safeguarding its integrity and ethical use.

3.2. Application of GAI in Engineering and Technology

In many engineering and technological fields, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has become a disruptive force that increases employee performance. As such, innovation is on the rise, and the pace of work is accelerating. This section therefore contains 20 unique and outstanding articles that demonstrate the impact of GAI on enhancing efficiency, improving safety, and enhancing creativity. These articles are categorized into three distinct groups, as detailed in Table 2, providing an organized overview of GAI’s impact in these specific fields.
Table 2. The applications of GAI in engineering and technology.
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in engineering and technology sectors marks a significant leap in operational efficiency, safety, and innovation. The analysis indicates that GAI notably improves the precision in identifying and rectifying defects, which enhances workplace safety and reliability while reducing operational downtime. Furthermore, the implementation of chatbots has emerged as a pivotal factor in refining human–machine interactions. This advancement leads to more efficient information exchange and task execution across various fields, highlighting GAI’s transformative impact in these sectors.
The integration of GAI into engineering and technology is transformative, enhancing productivity in various professional roles. Key issues such as practicality, bias, and human skill preservation are critical to ensuring that GAI aligns with company standards. This analysis suggests that technologies like chatbots in disaster response should complement, not replace, human expertise. A balanced approach, where GAI tools augment rather than dominate the workplace, is essential. These findings propose that the successful implementation of GAI hinges on careful application and ongoing evaluation to maximize effectiveness in these fields.

3.3. Application of GAI in Communication and Cultural Studies

Generative AI continues to grow as one of the new approaches to improving productivity in communication and cultural studies. This technology is an important tool to reflect the improvement and transition in how individuals interact with cultural diversity and how people perceive the continuing progress in communications. To elaborate more, this section delves into the challenges and applications of GAI for enhancing efficiency in communications and cultural studies. The six selected articles in Table 3 are categorized based on their primary focus, with specific themes outlined for each.
Table 3. The applications of GAI in communication and cultural studies.
This section’s content analysis on GAI in communication and cultural studies reveals how chatbots enhance user experience and perception, evolving from mere information providers to significant influencers of organizational brand image. The concept of “conversational branding” emerges, where chatbot interactions directly impact brand perception. Chatbots also streamline operations by handling routine queries, allowing human staff to focus on complex tasks, thus boosting overall workforce efficiency. The seamless integration of chatbots in communication strategies demonstrates a symbiotic relationship between user experience and productivity.
In cultural and tourism contexts, GAI plays a significant yet subtle role in enhancing productivity. For instance, GAI enhances a tourist’s experience by providing personalized recommendations and guidance, leading to more efficient and enjoyable trips. This optimization extends to industry-specific communication, facilitating more productive interactions. GAI’s ability to simultaneously improve user experience and professional efficiency makes it a valuable tool in various communication sectors.

3.4. Application of GAI in the Medical and Healthcare Discipline

Technologies and inventions advance at a rapid pace to meet the demands of a heterogeneous society, as do communications improvements while their influence seems to spread across the medical and healthcare discipline. As the influence of technologies and inventions spreads to all parts of medicine and healthcare, GAI is emerging as a key driver for changing the dynamics of this field. Thus, this section reviews research on the adoption of GAI technologies in healthcare, focusing on the most recent papers listed in Table 4. This selection provides a contemporary perspective on how GAI is influencing medical practices.
Table 4. The applications of GAI in the medical and healthcare Discipline.
This section synthesizes findings from selected studies on GAI integration in healthcare, focusing on enhancing medical tasks. GAI tools, especially chatbots, and ChatGPT, are highlighted for their potential in healthcare communication and support. Therefore, for effective implementation, healthcare organizations should enhance efficiency by becoming familiar with GAI tools and training their staff to mitigate risks. The authors note chatbots as key in simplifying healthcare interactions, enhancing staff productivity, and improving patient care.
Other studies focus on GAI’s technical aspects in healthcare, like automated pathology, clinical decision support, and radiology practices, aiding clinicians and reducing diagnostic errors. GAI enhances healthcare delivery by streamlining medical procedures. It also explores medical data reliance, secure IoT data transmission, and orthodontic advancements. GAI’s applications in healthcare encompass assessment, treatment, and research, with the aim of providing informed decisions, protecting privacy, and introducing innovative methods to medical practices.
The integration of GAI in healthcare suggests transformative potential in medical practices. While GAI enhances efficiency and potentially improves patient outcomes, it raises potential privacy challenges regarding medical data. This necessitates the development of ethical frameworks to balance efficiency gains with data privacy. The focus should be on aligning healthcare efficiency improvements and data protection to fully benefit from GAI in healthcare settings.

3.5. Application of GAI in Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences, Government, and Public Administration

Human experience and technology have come together at a new crossroads, with Generative AI emerging as a conduit for a radical shift in agriculture, agricultural research, governance, and public administration. This section, as outlined in Table 5, reviews research on implementing GAI in these sectors, focusing on its potential to enhance employee performance.
Table 5. The applications of GAI in agriculture, agricultural sciences, government, and public administration.
The selected articles explore the integration of GAI technologies, like chatbots and ChatGPT, in agriculture, agricultural sciences, government, and public administration. They assess how these tools enhance work scope and productivity, particularly for employees and farmers. GAI is noted for improving user experience, efficiency, and information flow in agriculture. The studies also discuss GAI’s potential in government, while acknowledging concerns like accessibility, data privacy, and infrastructure, emphasizing the need for addressing effective GAI application in these fields.
These studies emphasize the strategic use of AI in sectors like agriculture and government, acknowledging specific constraints to broaden GAI’s scope. They aim to raise awareness of potential challenges requiring solutions for successful technology adoption. A key focus is on responsible and safe AI integration, underscoring its role in driving positive changes in these fields.

3.6. Application of GAI in Business and Organizational Management

In light of the constant problems and changes in corporate management and organization, Generative AI emerges as a new and stimulating solution to increase company performance and efficiency. Table 6 summarizes a number of specialized studies that demonstrate the potential of GAI applications in the field of business management, with a particular focus on increasing employee productivity in both large and small companies.
Table 6. The applications of GAI in business and organizational management.
This section analyzes the impact of AI on business and organizational management. The research spans from AI’s strategic integration in banking to enhancing employee skills and user awareness. It offers insights on improving information flow in R&D companies and the role of AI in streamlining business processes and customer service. These conclusions inform strategic decision making for businesses exploring AI’s potential to increase staff productivity and operational efficiency. Based on the authors’ research and results, this section thoroughly examines the influence of AI on business and organizational management via GAI applications.
Future research should delve into the impact of enhanced knowledge-sharing platforms on research efficiency, particularly in business and organizational management. This research would guide AI integration and create frameworks for future AI exploration. Additionally, it should focus on addressing challenges in AI integration within research settings, ensuring successful technology application. Key areas include strategic AI integration in business operations, empowering employee efficiency and skills development, AI-driven business transformation, digital evolution, and enhancing quality and user perception.

3.7. Application of GAI in Miscellaneous Professional Fields

GAI has proven itself as an effective resource for increasing employee productivity across a wide range of professional fields. This section reviews studies that focus on the impact of GAI in enhancing employee productivity across various professional domains, as outlined in Table 7. The research provides insights into how GAI technologies are applied and their effects in different professional settings.
Table 7. The applications of GAI in miscellaneous professional fields.
This section highlights achievements in organizational transformation and increased worker productivity through GAI. It acknowledges challenges like data confidentiality and safety, emphasizing the need for robust data security. The section recommends that while GAI enhances process efficiency and strategy development, it is crucial to balance technology use with human skill preservation and social interaction in the workplace. Some authors view GAI as a tool for better decision making and improving organizational relationships, highlighting the importance of setting appropriate limits in its application.
Future research should focus on evaluating the multifaceted impact of GAI in organizational transformation. This includes exploring GAI’s benefits and risks across various sectors, its role in enhancing business processes and user experiences, and addressing the ethical and legal challenges it presents. Additionally, investigating how GAI can improve decision making and customer service effectiveness in organizations would be valuable.

3.8. Application of GAI in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence

In the era of rapid technological speed, GAI has become recognized as an important force for change in computer science and artificial intelligence. Therefore, this section examines the use of GAI in computer science and AI to boost employee efficiency. With 58 articles, it is one of the most extensive sections, offering a deep dive into GAI’s application in professional settings, particularly in the tech industry, as detailed in Table 8.
Table 8. The applications of GAI in computer science and artificial intelligence.
This research collection delves into enhancing professional productivity using GAI in computer science and AI. It explores increasing efficiency and value in tasks like professional writing and deep language processing. The studies also examine user interactions with AI technologies and their ethical implications. A significant focus is on the effectiveness of predictive Machine Learning algorithms in differentiating between human and AI-generated text, especially regarding ChatGPT, and how these technologies influence user interactions and motivations.
The articles explore ethical aspects of AI, aiming to enhance user experience with a focus on ethics. This research could positively impact technological applications across various sectors, improving service efficiency and quality. Future work aims to contribute significantly to AI, particularly in enhancing GAI’s role in professional settings. This includes advancing ChatGPT models and exploring new applications within set boundaries. Overall, the goal is to provide educational tools and support for individuals and professionals to effectively utilize AI in their daily tasks.
Future research based on these studies could explore different aspects of using GAI in these fields. Key areas include enhancing professional productivity through AI applications in tasks like mid-level professional writing, text annotation, and data science operations. Another important area is understanding user interactions and motivations with AI-generated chatbots by examining their influence on user satisfaction and decision making. Finally, ethical and philosophical implications of AI, including the misuse of AI text generators and the integration of AI in customer service, should be a significant focus to ensure responsible and sustainable AI development.
Figure 3 presents a fishbone diagram summarizing the use of GAI in enhancing employee efficiency across various professional domains. This hierarchical, fishbone structure helps to analyze and understand the potential causes and factors that may hinder achieving specific goals in GAI application [138].
Figure 3. Fishbone analysis of GAI impact on employee productivity in various sectors.
Figure 4 uses a spider diagram to summarize the main findings of this study, effectively employing a two-layer approach for clarity. The first layer shows the main fields in GAI applications and work productivity, with the circle sizes representing the dominance of each field based on the total number of articles relevant to each field, which totaled 159 articles across all fields. The second layer delves into the specific themes within these fields, with sub-circle sizes reflecting their importance based on the focus of the specific articles within each field. This diagram provides a comprehensive view of GAI’s impact on work productivity and the breadth of current research and applications.
Figure 4. Summary of GAI research and applications in various fields.
The next section will therefore conduct a bibliometric analysis of studies that utilize GAI to enhance workforce productivity across different sectors.

4. Bibliometric Analysis

This bibliometric analysis explores the link between workforce efficiency and GAI in professional settings. Utilizing a systematic approach, it reviews scholarly articles from Scopus to map GAI’s academic landscape. The focus is on its integration in various fields and its effect on employee performance. The analysis is key to identifying trends and themes and understanding GAI’s broader impacts on workforce productivity across disciplines. By systematically screening the literature and analyzing data, this section seeks to offer valuable insights into the current state and prospects of GAI in professional environments. This study focuses on a spectrum of critical topics, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of GAI research, principal methodologies, geographic distribution of scholarly contributions, and its diverse applications in professional domains. This segment of the analysis charts a path for future research expansion, examines word co-occurrence patterns to uncover emerging trends, and identifies notable implementations of GAI techniques within professional settings. These insights, derived from a detailed analysis and informed viewpoints, emphasize the evolving role of GAI and its practical impact across various professional landscapes.
VOSviewer 1.6.20, a widely used software tool in research, excels in creating five distinct types of visualization maps. These maps utilize circles to represent various elements like documents, scholars, and keywords, details of which are explored further. It is essential for users to understand three key aspects of these visualizations. First, larger circles and increased font sizes signify higher levels of activity, whereas smaller circles and fonts indicate lesser activity. Secondly, the spatial distance between any two words in the visualization correlates with their degree of interrelation; closer proximity suggests a stronger link, while greater distance implies a weaker association. Lastly, these visualizations offer insights into the interconnectedness and relative prominence of research topics within a field [139].

4.1. Co-Occurrence Map Based on Text Data

By scrutinizing the textual content of the 159 chosen publications, we successfully pinpointed terms that hold significance and occur with regularity. The process of text data analysis aims to extract pertinent terms found within the titles and abstracts of the chosen articles. Subsequently, it builds a network of co-occurrence connections among these terms [139]. This systematic analysis empowers researchers to pinpoint influential terminology within the field of GAI in professional domains. In totality, 1419 distinct terms were generated, with 15 of them surpassing the established minimum threshold of five occurrences. To further enhance the selection of terms, VOSviewer calculates a relevance score for each term [139]. This meticulous process resulted in the discovery of the 15 words highlighted in the network, as seen in Figure 5. In this context, highly relevant phrases, such as “Artificial Intelligence” (AI), imply a concentration on more specific themes within the content of the document. Additionally, keywords with lower relevance scores are considered generic [139].
Figure 5. Co-occurrence map of text data.
The results of a wide range of studies and investigations in the field of enhancing employee productivity within corporate contexts using GAI are shown in Figure 6. The network of key phrases proposes that AI research has expanded into a variety of disciplines, including natural language processing, generative adversarial networks, human–computer interaction, user interfaces, and Conversational Agents. The outcomes underscore AI’s game-changing potential, as indicated by the rise of concepts like “productivity”, “human”, and “efficiency”. Figure 6 additionally demonstrates the direct correlations between AI and these concepts.
Figure 6. Terms directly connected with “Artificial Intelligence”.
Furthermore, Figure 6 depicts a significant correlation between AI and chatbots in terms of the integration of AI technology into the regulatory domain. To elaborate more, chatbots are an operational application of AI technology, notably in the field of NLP. Based on several professional areas, the utilization of chatbots has increased remarkably in recent years. This increase may be ascribed to their ability to automate operations, improve operational efficiency, raise customer service standards, and provide useful insights. Moreover, integrating GAI into a company’s operations can have an important impact on a range of aspects of individuals’ work experiences, such as productivity, motivation, and learning outcomes. Furthermore, the link of GAI with terms like “productivity”, “human”, “efficiency”, and “Deep Learning” emphasizes the beneficial presence of GAI applications in business organizations. GAI has the potential to support a variety of professional aspects, including data analysis, repetitive task automation, customer support, predictive analytics, supply chain optimization, talent management, healthcare diagnosis, legal research, innovation, and ethical decision making. On the other hand, the use of GAI in assessments creates concerns about the fairness and dependability of automated evaluation systems, which is why it is critical to avoid any unethical behaviors.
The highest eight words that appeared the most frequently, together with their corresponding frequency counts, are listed in Table 9. Furthermore, each phrase receives a relevance value calculated by VOSviewer. This software tool also examined the distribution of (second order) co-occurrences among all words for each term and then compared it with the general distribution of co-occurrences across terms. Table 1 provides a complete analysis of the key phrases that are commonly used in the context of GAI’s involvement; these phrases shed light on the many facets of GAI’s integration into professional areas. The term “efficiency” refers to the larger context in which AI functions, highlighting the importance of optimizing and simplifying AI systems and processes, particularly for personnel. On the flip side, “performance” refers to GAI’s ability to excel or achieve in a variety of jobs. To clarify more, performance refers to how successfully an AI system can achieve its intended goals, solve issues, and adapt to changing circumstances. The word “language” emphasizes the need to tackle communication hurdles and language diversity in institutional settings. “User interface” highlights GAI’s favorable potential for improving accessibility, usability, and user happiness by enabling seamless interactions between people and sophisticated AI systems. The popularity of “machine learning” indicates the critical role it plays in artificial intelligence, acting as the basis upon which AI algorithms and models are created, allowing computers to interpret and analyze data. Similarly, phrases such as “efficiency” and “Deep Learning” highlight GAI’s importance in boosting staff effectiveness and its ability to revolutionize workforce efficiency.
Table 9. Top eight terms by occurrence.

4.2. Co-Occurrence Map Based on Keywords

This research analyzed bibliographic data from 159 selected papers, identifying a total of 1419 keywords. From this dataset, 26 keywords were selected based on a minimum occurrence threshold of six, as depicted in Figure 7. The utilization of a thesaurus in VOSviewer played a crucial role in standardizing these keywords, effectively eliminating redundancy and repetitive terms. The analysis includes both author keywords, which are specifically chosen by the authors of the articles, and index keywords, assigned by indexers or databases for the purposes of classifying articles and indexing information. This dual approach ensures a comprehensive representation of the research landscape [139]. The most common keywords discovered were “AI”, “chatbots”, “ChatGPT”, and “efficiency”.
Figure 7. Co-occurrence map of all keywords.
Moreover, a collection of the ten most frequently used keywords, presented in Table 10, provides insight into their individual frequencies as well as the aggregate link strength they carry. The cumulative robustness of co-occurrence relationships between a certain term and its equivalents is represented by this link strength [139].
Table 10. Top 10 terms by occurrence.
This section highlights important trends and emerging research areas in this field. In Table 10, terms like “Artificial Intelligence” underline its importance in evolving organizational processes, while “ChatGPT” exemplifies its role in AI chatbots and wide-ranging professional uses. “Efficiency” and “chatbot” emphasize GAI’s impact on organizational operations and interactions. “Deep Learning” and “Machine Learning” represent the integration of high-tech capabilities and algorithm application in professional contexts. In addition, the term “human” focuses on the experiences of clients and employees, underlining the expansive research scope of GAI in improving professional operations through technological advancements.
For a clearer understanding, VOSviewer has produced two additional keyword maps. The first, shown in Figure 8, maps the co-occurrence of author-assigned keywords, highlighting 12 key terms that each appear at least five times. The second map, in Figure 9, visualizes index keywords, again using a minimum occurrence of five, and displays a network of 30 significant terms. These maps provide visual insights into the most emphasized keywords from both author and indexing perspectives, aiding in the understanding of key research themes.
Figure 8. Co-occurrence map of author keywords.
Figure 9. Co-occurrence map of index keywords.
The keyword analysis in this study highlights the primary themes in GAI research within professional settings. Key terms such as “Artificial Intelligence”, “ChatGPT”, and “productivity” demonstrate the value of technology in transforming professional practices. This represents a trend toward integrating advanced AI solutions in various professional domains to drive efficiency and innovation.

4.3. Co-Occurrence Map Based on Country of Co-Authorship

The co-occurrence map based on the country of co-authorship in this study offers insights into the geographical spread of the 159 selected articles. A visual map highlights the global distribution of research, focusing on countries with a minimum of five publications. Out of 59 countries with published papers, 17 met this criterion, as shown in Figure 10. The United States, China, India, and the United Kingdom emerged as major contributors. Table 11 details the top ten countries, illustrating significant global research connections, thereby providing a clear picture of international collaboration in this field.
Figure 10. Country of co-authorships.
Table 11. Top 10 countries by link strength.
Table 11 systematically highlights the top ten countries contributing significantly to GAI research, focusing on sectors both commercial and governmental, particularly in enhancing employee productivity. The United States leads this ranking, showing its dominance in GAI research, followed by China, showcasing its robust involvement, and other countries like India, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Australia, the Netherlands, Poland, and Taiwan also feature, reflecting their active participation in GAI advancements
The widespread geographic distribution of research on GAI in professional settings reflects its global relevance and collaborative nature.
European nations such as the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, and Poland have a significant influence in the domain of GAI research and technological innovation. Collectively, they contribute to 49 documents, which, when assessed in relation to their combined population compared with that of China, underscores their substantial impact on GAI research.

4.4. Co-Occurrence Map Based on Authorship

This study explores authorship dynamics in GAI research, focusing on contributors with at least five citations. Of the 159 authors reviewed, 41 surpassed this criterion. The resultant network visualization, shown in Figure 11, displays varied connections but lacks intertwined links that strongly unite these twenty-five authors, reflecting a diverse yet independent authorship landscape in this field.
Figure 11. Co-occurrence map of authors.
The network visualization in this study, characterized by isolated circles without interconnections, underscores a dual nature in GAI research for enhancing labor productivity: individual efforts and a notable lack of collaboration. This highlights the need for more interdisciplinary partnerships to foster innovation and knowledge exchange in this field. The distinct separation of these circles in the visualization indicates a major gap in collaborative dynamics, underscoring the importance of both individual contributions and collective efforts.
Table 12 showcases leading authors in GAI research within professional sectors. Their significant impact is evident from their high citation counts and strong link strengths. Notably, each author contributed a single paper to the 159 articles reviewed, underscoring a notable deficit in collaborative research efforts.
Table 12. Top 10 authors by citations.
The authors George et al., Dwivedi et al., and Leo John et al. are prominent in GAI research, with citation counts of 169, 112, and 39, respectively. George et al.’s 2017 paper [140], “A Generative Vision Training Model with Unprecedented Data Efficiency and Victory over Text-Based CAPTCHA”, stands out. This groundbreaking work significantly influenced the early development of engineering and technology applications in GAI, setting a foundation for future innovations in the field.

4.5. Data Analysis Based on Document Field

The 159 publications were categorized into 9 primary fields, with each field’s productivity measured by article frequency. The bar graph in Figure 12 illustrates the top nine fields by publication number, showcasing the multidisciplinary reach of GAI research. This analysis includes disciplines such as computer science, business, and medicine, highlighting the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration in addressing complex challenges in GAI adoption.
Figure 12. Bar graph of the top 9 fields by number of publications.

4.6. Data Analysis on Document Type, GAI Tools Used, and Research Types

This study categorizes articles by document type, presenting these data in the chart in Figure 13. “Conference paper” leads with 75 entries, followed by “article” at 70, “review” at 8, and “book chapter” at 4. The dominance of conference papers reflects the emerging nature of GAI, with researchers favoring conferences due to quicker publication timelines compared with journals.
Figure 13. Occurrence of document types.
This study also analyzed the tools mentioned in each publication, revealing insights into their use in enhancing employee productivity through GAI, as detailed in Figure 14. Generic terms such as “GAI” and “AI” are frequently used. Specific categories include “Chatbots and Conversational Agents”, “Generative AI Models”, “AI Algorithms and Techniques”, “AI Integration”, and “Adoption of Conversational Agents”. This classification facilitates an understanding of different methodologies, allowing for a deeper examination of GAI tools and their impact on productivity in professional settings.
Figure 14. Occurrence of AI tools used.
The category “Chatbots and Conversational Agents” dominates the research, appearing in 48 articles, underlining its significance in organizational contexts for various professional tasks. This prominence highlights its role in enhancing workplace efficiency, as it is particularly valued for automating tasks and facilitating access to information. The categories “AI Algorithms and Techniques” and “Generative AI Models” also feature prominently with 44 mentions, highlighting their importance in research. Meanwhile, “AI Integration” and “Adoption of Conversational Agents” are less frequent but still noticeable, each with nine occurrences, showcasing diverse technology applications in the field.
In Figure 15, “Research Methods” clearly stands out as the most common category with 62 instances, with an emphasis on methodological rigor. “Proposal and Development” are followed with 39 articles, focusing on data and model evaluation. “Development and Application of Models” ranked third with 28 mentions, highlighting the system’s building of organizational support. “Overview and Assessment” and “Analysis and Solution”, appear 19 and 10 times, respectively, indicating different research focuses, from broad GAI impact evaluations to more targeted problem-solving approaches.
Figure 15. Occurrence of research types in professional fields.
This bibliometric analysis has provided valuable insights into the impact of GAI on workforce efficiency across various professional settings. It highlights the importance of GAI in enhancing employee productivity, underscoring its role in current trends and future research directions. This study emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of GAI and its diverse applications.

5. Conclusions and Future Research

The integration of GAI in various organizations marks a significant leap in digital transformation and creativity enhancement. Its application across sectors like academia, engineering, and communications is revolutionizing how work productivity is increased, from creating compelling advertising to swiftly producing accurate technical reports. However, GAI’s implementation poses ethical challenges, necessitating adherence to safety standards and legislation. Recognizing its social and cultural implications is crucial. Thus, while GAI is a potent tool for businesses, its effective and responsible use requires careful management. This review deeply analyses GAI’s impact in these areas, drawing insights from 159 Scopus-sourced publications.
The first phase of this study involved an in-depth review of the application of GAI in a variety of fields such as academia, research, engineering, technology, communications, cultural studies, agriculture and agricultural sciences, government and public administration, and business organization. This research was carried out by conducting a comprehensive assessment and content analysis of the important literature in these disciplines.
The content analysis revealed noteworthy findings from eight separate fields on GAI applications, providing a complete overview of its benefits and possible challenges. The literature review focuses on the eight disciplines mentioned above and their relevance to GAI applications. Furthermore, research publications provide conclusions in the study of applications of GAI in a variety of fields, emphasizing significant benefits. However, ethical and safety issues do occur, underscoring the importance of careful deliberation. GAI promotes educational governance and information exchange in academia but also requires ethical concerns. Engineering research also emphasizes increased efficiency, safety, and error detection, as well as calling for continuous review and bias resolution of this technology. Through the integration of GAI, communications and cultural studies desire to improve the user experience and influence the reputations of companies. In the field of healthcare, research focuses on the role of chatbots in medical tasks, with an emphasis on training and privacy solutions. As agricultural companies and the government investigate GAI technology to boost production, stakeholders face obstacles such as issues of access and data confidentiality. Articles in the field of business management address the role of GAI in the growth of banks and companies, with an emphasis on data security and balancing human aspects. Thus, computer science research needs to examine and predict performance while also addressing ethical and societal issues.
Following the completion of the content analysis, the second stage involved a bibliometric analysis of the relationship between GAI and work productivity within the indicated fields. This procedure entails screening a large number of previously published papers and publications from the Scopus database. This study is enhanced by a comprehensive examination of the literature and elimination of duplication to provide a curated list of 159 papers specifically focusing on GAI for improving user productivity across eight key areas.
A large-scale bibliometric study analyzing the use of GAI in the above-mentioned fields has provided insights into changing professional structures and increasing productivity. To expand, an analysis of GAI applications revealed a significant and rapid expansion from 2014 to September 2023, with a striking increase in publications in 2023, likely as a result of the widespread popularity and innovation driven by tools such as ChatGPT. This highlights the critical importance of communication and collaboration in effectively disseminating GAI techniques in specific fields of study. However, scholarly exchange in this area requires concerted efforts to enhance authors’ collaboration and expand the application of GAI in these areas of study.
It is important to acknowledge a notable gap in our literature review concerning the application of GAI in the finance industry. While our review predominantly focused on employee productivity across various sectors, the specific intersection of GAI with financial services has emerged as a burgeoning area of interest. For instance, the study by Dowling and Lucey [143] explores the potential of ChatGPT in finance research, underscoring its utility in idea generation and data identification, while also highlighting limitations in literature synthesis and developing testing frameworks. Additionally, the work of Ali and Aysan [144], published after our search deadline, delves into the diverse applications of ChatGPT in finance, ranging from customer engagement to stock forecasting. These studies indicate a growing recognition of GAI’s potential within the financial sector and propose an expanding research horizon. Future research endeavors are likely to fill this gap, shedding more light on the multifaceted implications and uses of GAI technologies in the financial domain.
In exploring future research directions for the enhancement of employee productivity through GAI, a range of critical areas has been identified. These encompass various sectors and require in-depth investigation to fully leverage GAI’s potential in boosting workplace efficiency and innovation. In the field of professional development in education, there is a need for comprehensive research into the necessary skills and competencies for educators and researchers to integrate GAI. This includes evaluating current training programs and proposing innovative models that blend technical skills with pedagogical methods. The issue of AI bias and discrimination calls for the development of methodological approaches aimed at reducing biases in GAI applications, potentially through interdisciplinary research that combines AI technology with insights from social sciences. The field of quality assurance and evaluation models in GAI requires expansion, particularly in integrating Machine Learning techniques. Research should explore the applicability of GAI across diverse sectors, extending beyond employee performance metrics. Data privacy and security in GAI applications is another critical area. Research should focus on the latest advancements in encryption and data security, considering their impact on user trust and regulatory compliance. Enhancing user experience in GAI applications is essential, with a focus on linguistic and cultural adaptability. Research should delve into user interface designs that are inclusive and appealing to a diverse user base. Addressing the technology access gap, especially in rural areas, is vital. This involves developing strategies for infrastructure improvement, policy interventions, and community-based approaches to ensure widespread technology access and adoption. In healthcare, GAI holds transformative potential. Future research should pinpoint specific areas, like predictive analytics for patient care and administrative process optimization, where GAI can make significant contributions. Legal and regulatory frameworks related to GAI call for focused research, especially in developing international standards and exploring liability issues. Interdisciplinary collaboration is key to the development of GAI. Research should emphasize the importance of cross-sector collaboration and investigate potential models and their outcomes. Finally, ethical considerations in professional sectors regarding GAI use need expansion. This includes proposing ethical frameworks and guidelines and discussing the long-term societal implications of GAI.
This extensive literature review on GAI is a comprehensive exploration of its applications in a variety of sectors, providing a nuanced understanding of its role in enhancing productivity. By examining GAI’s usage in different professional environments, this work offers valuable insights for future researchers and practitioners. It serves as a crucial resource for identifying emerging trends, understanding current challenges, and discovering potential opportunities for innovation in GAI. Furthermore, this review underscores the importance of strategic implementation and continuous assessment of GAI technologies, guiding future endeavors to optimize their utility in diverse professional environments. The synthesis of these findings provides a roadmap for future research and practical applications, highlighting areas where GAI can be leveraged for significant improvements in productivity and efficiency.
In concluding this review paper on enhancing work productivity through GAI, the rapidly evolving nature of this field is recognized. The categories and statistics presented in this study reflect the current state of research but are likely to undergo significant changes as the field advances. Therefore, this work serves as a foundational reference for ongoing research, with the understanding that future developments will bring new perspectives to these findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; methodology, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; software, H.A.N.; formal analysis, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; investigation, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; resources, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; data curation, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.N.; writing—review and editing, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; visualization, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A.; supervision, Z.B. and V.A.; project administration, H.A.N., Z.B. and V.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support of the American University of Sharjah under the Open Access Program. This paper represents the opinions of the authors and does not mean to represent the position or opinions of the American University of Sharjah.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Melehy, A.K. The Impact of AI on the Economy: A Comprehensive Analysis. 2023. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370400293_The_Impact_of_AI_on_the_Economy_A_Comprehensive_Analysis (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  2. Jutel, M.; Zemelka-Wiacek, M.; Ordak, M.; Pfaar, O.; Eiwegger, T.; Rechenmacher, M.; Akdis, C. The artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: How important for scientific work and its reliable sharing. Allergy 2023, 78, 2085–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hadi, M.U.; Al-Tashi, Q.; Qureshi, R.; Shah, A.; Muneer, A.; Irfan, M.; Zafar, A.; Shaikh, M.; Akhtar, N.; Wu, J.; et al. Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Its Applications, Challenges, Limitations, and Future Prospects. 2023. Available online: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/618307/articles/682263-large-language-models-a-comprehensive-survey-of-its-applications-challenges-limitations-and-future-prospects (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  4. Mhlanga, D. The Value of Open AI and Chat GPT for the Current Learning Environments and The Potential Future Uses. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hadi, M.; Najm, M. Introduction to ChatGPT: A new revolution of artificial intelligence with machine learning algorithms and cybersecurity. Sci. Arch. 2023, 4, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borji, A.; Mohammadian, M. Battle of the Wordsmiths: Comparing ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, and Bard. 2023. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4476855 (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  7. Feuerriegel, S.; Hartmann, J.; Janiesch, C.; Zschech, P. Generative AI. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2023, 66, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Banh, L.; Strobel, G. Generative artificial intelligence. Electron. Mark. 2023, 33, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lund, B.; Wang, T. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Libr. Hi Tech News 2023, 40, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nah, F.; Zheng, R.; Cai, J.; Siau, K.; Chen, L. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 2023, 25, 277–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morris, M. Scientists’ Perspectives on the Potential for Generative AI in their Fields. 2023. Available online: https://montrealethics.ai/scientists-perspectives-on-the-potential-for-generative-ai-in-their-fields/ (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  12. Mao, J.; Chen, B.; Liu, J. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education and Its Implications for Assessment. TechTrends 2023, 68, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, P.; Kamel Boulos, M. Generative AI in Medicine and Healthcare: Promises, Opportunities and Challenges. Future Internet 2023, 15, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Epstein, Z.; Hertzmann, A.; Herman, L.; Mahari, R.; Frank, M.; Groh, M.; Schroeder, H.; Smith, A.; Akten, M.; Fjeld, J.; et al. Art and the Science of Generative AI: A Deeper Dive. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.04141. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cardon, P.; Getchell, K.; Carradini, S.; Fleischmann, A.C.; Stapp, J. Generative AI in the Workplace: Employee Perspectives of ChatGPT Benefits and Organizational Policies. 2023. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/b3ezy (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  16. Govori, A.; Sejdija, Q. Future prospects and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence within the business practices of small and medium enterprises. J. Gov. Regul. 2023, 12, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gonçalves, R.; Dias, Á.; Costa, R.; Pereira, L.; Bento, T.; Rosa, Á. Gaining competitive advantage through artificial intelligence adoption. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 2022, 1, 386–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wamba-Taguimdje, S.; Fosso Wamba, S.; Jean Robert, K.K.; Tchatchouang, C.E. Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Firm Performance: The Business Value of AI-based Transformation Projects. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2020, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patole Sanjay Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021.
  20. Budhwar, P.; Chowdhury, S.; Wood, G.; Aguinis, H.; Bamber, G.J.; Beltran, J.R.; Boselie, P.; Lee Cooke, F.; Decker, S.; DeNisi, A.; et al. Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2023, 33, 606–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Varnavsky, A.N. Chatbot to Increase the Effectiveness of the «flipped Classroom» Technology. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, TELE 2022, Lipetsk, Russian, 26–27 May 2022; pp. 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Košecka, D.; Balco, P.; Murgor, S.C. Chatbot at University, a Communication Tool to Increase Work Productivity. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2022, 527, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sebastian, D.; Nugraha, K.A. Academic Customer Service Chatbot Development using TelegramBot API. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Innovative and Creative Information Technology, ICITech 2021, Salatiga, Indonesia, 23–25 September 2021; pp. 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suresh, N.; Mukabe, N.; Hashiyana, V.; Limbo, A.; Hauwanga, A. Career Counseling Chatbot on Facebook Messenger using AI. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Science, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Windhoek, Namibia, 9–12 August 2021; pp. 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Colace, F.; De Santo, M.; Lombardi, M.; Pascale, F.; Pietrosanto, A.; Lemma, S. Chatbot for e-learning: A case of study. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res. 2018, 7, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dergaa, I.; Chamari, K.; Zmijewski, P.; Saad, H.B. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol. Sport 2023, 40, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leiker, D.; Gyllen, A.R.; Eldesouky, I.; Cukurova, M. Generative AI for Learning: Investigating the Potential of Learning Videos with Synthetic Virtual Instructors. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2023, 1831, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muhyidin, A.; Setiawan, M.A.F. Developing UNYSA Chatbot as Information Services about Yogyakarta State University. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1737, 012038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Irwan, D.; Ali, M.; Ahmed, A.N.; Jacky, G.; Nurhakim, A.; Ping Han, M.C.; AlDahoul, N.; El-Shafie, A. Predicting Water Quality with Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Methods and Applications. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 4633–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, Y.; Lin, J.; Tang, S.; Zhou, J.; Yang, S.; Qi, Y.; Ren, X. Generating natural language adversarial examples on a large scale with generative models. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 2020, 325, 2156–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Vinogradov, A. Improving the Performance of Convolutional GAN Using History-State Ensemble for Unsupervised Early Fault Detection with Acoustic Emission Signals. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ratajczak, J.; Siegele, D.; Niederwieser, E. Maximizing Energy Efficiency and Daylight Performance in Office Buildings in BIM through RBFOpt Model-Based Optimization: The GENIUS Project. Buildings 2023, 13, 1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Q.; Xue, F. Pushing the boundaries of modular-integrated construction: A symmetric skeleton grammar-based multi-objective optimization of passive design for energy savings and daylight autonomy. Energy Build. 2023, 296, 113417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Liu, N.; Wang, S. Generative design and performance optimization of residential buildings based on parametric algorithm. Energy Build. 2021, 244, 111033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Manuel, F.; Philipp, E.; Boris, K.; Stefan, G.; Antonio, D.; Valentyn, B. Numerical performance predictions of artificial intelligence-driven centrifugal compressor designs. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Fluids Eng. Div. Publ. FEDSM 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Venkatesh, K.; Pratibha, K.; Annadurai, S.; Kuppusamy, L. Reconfigurable architecture to speed-up modular exponentiation. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, Chennai, India, 1–3 October 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmad, A.; Waseem, M.; Liang, P.; Fahmideh, M.; Aktar, M.S.; Mikkonen, T. Towards Human-Bot Collaborative Software Architecting with ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Oulu, Finland, 14–16 June 2023; pp. 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, X.; Ma, H.; Liu, Y. A Novel Transfer Learning Method Based on Conditional Variational Generative Adversarial Networks for Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Gearboxes under Variable Working Conditions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhu, J.-F.; Hao, Z.-K.; Liu, Q.; Yin, Y.; Lu, C.-Q.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Chen, E.-H. Towards Exploring Large Molecular Space: An Efficient Chemical Genetic Algorithm. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2022, 37, 1464–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nawrocki, P.; Radziszowski, D.; Sniezynski, B. Heterogeneous Information Access System with a Natural Language Interface in the Context of Organization of Events. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2021, 1371, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Badini, S.; Regondi, S.; Frontoni, E.; Pugliese, R. Assessing the capabilities of ChatGPT to improve additive manufacturing troubleshooting. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2023, 6, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsai, M.-H.; Chan, H.-Y.; Chan, Y.-L.; Shen, H.-K.; Lin, P.-Y.; Hsu, C.-W. A chatbot system to support mine safety procedures during natural disasters. Sustainability 2021, 13, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, L. Application Model Construction of Traditional Cultural Elements in Illustration Design under Artificial Intelligence Background. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Meng, L.; Schaffer, S. A Reporting Assistant for Railway Security Staff. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Bilbao, Spain, 22–24 July 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhong, B.; He, W.; Huang, Z.; Love, P.E.D.; Tang, J.; Luo, H. A building regulation question answering system: A deep learning methodology. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 46, 101195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, Y.-Z.; Chuang, J.-Y.; Sheng, I.C.; Cheng, Y.T.; Chang, C.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Hsueh, H.-P.; Huang, C.-H. Development of a task-oriented chatbot application for monitoring Taiwan photon source front-end system. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Emerging Technologies and Scientific Facilities Controls, PCaPAC 2018, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 16–19 October 2018; pp. 228–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Angeline, R.; Gaurav, T.; Rampuriya, P.; Dey, S. Supermarket Automation with Chatbot and Face Recognition Using IoT and AI. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems, ICCES 2018, Coimbatore, India, 15–16 October 2018; pp. 1183–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saka, A.B.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akanbi, L.A.; Ganiyu, S.A.; Chan, D.W.M.; Bello, S.A. Conversational artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: A review of present status, challenges and opportunities. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2023, 55, 101869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yazici, S. A machine-learning model driven by geometry, material and structural performance data in architectural design process. Proc. Int. Conf. Educ. Res. Comput. Aided Archit. Des. Eur. 2020, 1, 411–418. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou, Q.; Li, B.; Han, L.; Jou, M. Talking to a bot or a wall? How chatbots vs. human agents affect anticipated communication quality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 143, 107674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wagner, N.; Kraus, M.; Tonn, T.; Minker, W. Comparing Moderation Strategies in Group Chats with Multi-User Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Glasgow, UK, 26–28 July 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Casillo, M.; De Santo, M.; Mosca, R.; Santaniello, D. An Ontology-Based Chatbot to Enhance Experiential Learning in a Cultural Heritage Scenario. Front. Artif. Intell. 2022, 5, 808281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carvalho, I.; Ivanov, S. ChatGPT for tourism: Applications, benefits and risks. Tour. Rev. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lopezosa, C.; Codina, L.; Pont-Sorribes, C.; Vállez, M. Use of generative artificial intelligence in the training of journalists: Challenges, uses and training proposal. Prof. De La Inf. 2023, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Płaza, M.; Trusz, S.; Kęczkowska, J.; Boksa, E.; Sadowski, S.; Koruba, Z. Machine Learning Algorithms for Detection and Classifications of Emotions in Contact Center Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Comulada, W.S.; Rezai, R.; Sumstine, S.; Flores, D.D.; Kerin, T.; Ocasio, M.A.; Swendeman, D.; Fernández, M.I. A necessary conversation to develop chatbots for HIV studies: Qualitative findings from research staff, community advisory board members, and study participants. In AIDS Care—Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV; Taylor Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gala, D.; Makaryus, A.N. The Utility of Language Models in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Benefits and Concerns of ChatGPT-4. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 6438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Santandreu-Calonge, D.; Medina-Aguerrebere, P.; Hultberg, P.; Shah, M.-A. Can ChatGPT improve communication in hospitals? Prof. Inf. 2023, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nandini Prasad, K.S.; Sudhanva, S.; Tarun, T.N.; Yuvraaj, Y.; Vishal, D.A. Conversational Chatbot Builder—Smarter Virtual Assistance with Domain Specific AI. In Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference for Emerging Technology, INCET 2023, Belgaum, India, 26–28 May 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lecler, A.; Duron, L.; Soyer, P. Revolutionizing radiology with GPT-based models: Current applications, future possibilities and limitations of ChatGPT. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2023, 104, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ong, H.; Ong, J.; Cheng, R.; Wang, C.; Lin, M.; Ong, D. GPT Technology to Help Address Longstanding Barriers to Care in Free Medical Clinics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 51, 1906–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ouyang, C.; Ren, L.; Wen, W. Counterfactual can be strong in medical question and answering. Inf. Process. Manag. 2023, 60, 103408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bussola, N.; Xu, J.; Wu, L.; Gorini, L.; Zhang, Y.; Furlanello, C.; Tong, W. A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Framework for Whole Slide Classification to Facilitate Digital Pathology in Animal Study. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2023, 36, 1321–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Grupac, M.; Zauskova, A.; Nica, E. Generative Artificial Intelligence-based Treatment Planning in Clinical Decision-Making, in Precision Medicine, and in Personalized Healthcare. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2023, 15, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Panthier, C.; Gatinel, D. Success of ChatGPT, an AI language model, in taking the French language version of the European Board of Ophthalmology examination: A novel approach to medical knowledge assessment. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2023, 46, 706–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tustumi, F.; Andreollo, N.A.; de Aguilar-Nascimento, J.E. Future of the Language Models in Healthcare: The Role of chatGPT. Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. 2023, 36, e1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Escorcia-Gutierrez, J.; Mansour, R.F.; Leal, E.; Villanueva, J.; Jimenez-Cabas, J.; Soto, C.; Soto-Díaz, R. Privacy Preserving Blockchain with Energy Aware Clustering Scheme for IoT Healthcare Systems. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Strunga, M.; Urban, R.; Surovková, J.; Thurzo, A. Artificial Intelligence Systems Assisting in the Assessment of the Course and Retention of Orthodontic Treatment. Healthcare 2023, 11, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, E.T.G.; Chen, A.P.S.; Liu, C.W. A Hybrid Evaluation of AI Chatbots in Taiwan Agriculture Services. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, TAAI 2021, Taichung, Taiwan, 18–20 November 2021; pp. 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Feitosa, W.R.; Do Patrocinio, F.O.; Santos, S.R.; Silva, S.C.E. Proposal for a Chatbot Prototype in the Plant Health Department of Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/ITU International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Good, AI4G 2020, Geneva, Switzerland, 21–25 September 2020; pp. 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ramadoss, P.; Ananth, V.; Navaneetha, M.; Oviya, U. E -Xpert Bot -Guidance and Pest Detection for Smart Agriculture using AI. In Proceedings of the 2023 12th IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, CSNT 2023, Bhopal, India, 8–9 April 2023; pp. 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Usip, P.U.; Udo, E.N.; Asuquo, D.E.; James, O.R. A Machine Learning-Based Mobile Chatbot for Crop Farmers. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 1666, 192–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tsai, M.-H.; Yang, C.-H.; Chen, J.Y.; Kang, S.-C. Four-Stage Framework for Implementing a Chatbot System in Disaster Emergency Operation Data Management: A Flood Disaster Management Case Study. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 25, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Walkowiak, E. Task-interdependencies between Generative AI and Workers. Econ. Lett. 2023, 231, 111315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bankins, S.; Ocampo, A.C.; Marrone, M.; Restubog, S.L.D.; Woo, S.E. A multilevel review of artificial intelligence in organizations: Implications for organizational behavior research and practice. J. Organ. Behav. 2023. early review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Araujo, T.; Van Zoonen, W.; Ter Hoeven, C. “A Large Playground”: Examining the Current State and Implications of Conversational Agent Adoption in Organizations. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2022, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Makhija, P.; Chacko, E. Efficiency and Advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Service Sector with Special Reference to Banking Industry. In Fourth Industrial Revolution and Business Dynamics: Issues and Implications Efficiency and Advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Service Sector with Special Reference to Banking Industry; Springer Science + Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  78. Illescas, C.; Ortega, T.; Jadán-Guerrero, J. Gender Bias in Chatbots and Its Programming. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2023, 337, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Anagnoste, S.; Biclesanu, I.; D’Ascenzo, F.; Savastano, M. The Role of Chatbots in End-To-End Intelligent Automation and Future Employment Dynamics. In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Straßer, T.; Axmann, B. Analysis and evaluation of ai applications in logistics. Logist. J. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, B.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, R. From fiction to fact: The growing role of generative AI in business and finance. J. Chin. Econ. Bus. Stud. 2023, 21, 471–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Leo John, R.J.; Potti, N.; Patel, J.M. Ava: From data to insights through conversation. In Proceedings of the CIDR 2017—8th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Chaminade, CA, USA, 8–11 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  83. Al-Ababneh, H.; Borisova, V.; Zakharzhevska, A.; Tkachenko, P.; Andrusiak, N. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Banking Institutions. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 2023, 20, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fan, H.; Gao, W.; Han, B. Are AI chatbots a cure-all? The relative effectiveness of chatbot ambidexterity in crafting hedonic and cognitive smart experiences. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 156, 113526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Saengrith, W.; Viriyavejakul, C.; Pimdee, P. Problem-Based Blended Training via Chatbot to Enhance the Problem-Solving Skill in the Workplace. Emerg. Sci. J. 2022, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chithra Apoorva, D.A.; Brahmananda, S.H. A future research scope: Survey on an artificial interactive agent. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 6158–6166. [Google Scholar]
  87. Virkar, M.; Honmane, V.; Rao, S.U. Humanizing the chatbot with semantics based natural language generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems, ICCS 2019, Madurai, India, 15–17 May 2019; pp. 891–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chandar, P.; Khazaeni, Y.; Davis, M.; Muller, M.; Crasso, M.; Liao, Q.V.; Shami, N.S.; Geyer, W. Leveraging Conversational Systems to Assists New Hires During Onboarding. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinform. 2017, 10514, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Steinbauer, F.; Kern, R.; Kröll, M. Chatbots assisting German business management applications. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinform. 2019, 11606, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Piyatumrong, A.; Sangkeettrakarn, C.; Witdumrong, S.; Cherdgone, J. Chatbot technology adaptation to reduce the information gap in RD center: A case study of an IT research organization. In Proceedings of the PICMET 2018—Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Managing Technological Entrepreneurship: The Engine for Economic Growth, Proceedings, Honolulu, HI, USA, 19–23 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hsu, C.-L.; Lin, J.C.-C. Understanding the user satisfaction and loyalty of customer service chatbots. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hung, P.D.; Trang, D.T.; Khai, T. Integrating Chatbot and RPA into Enterprise Applications Based on Open, Flexible and Extensible Platforms. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinform. 2021, 12983, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Silva, S.C.; De Cicco, R.; Vlačić, B.; Elmashhara, M.G. Using chatbots in e-retailing—How to mitigate perceived risk and enhance the flow experience. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2023, 51, 285–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bialkova, S. How to Optimise Interaction with Chatbots? Key Parameters Emerging from Actual Application. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mehrolia, S.; Alagarsamy, S.; Moorthy, V. Will Users Continue Using Banking Chatbots? The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk. FIIB Bus. Rev. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lappeman, J.; Marlie, S.; Johnson, T.; Poggenpoel, S. Trust and digital privacy: Willingness to disclose personal information to banking chatbot services. J. Financ. Serv. Mark. 2023, 28, 337–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kar, A.K.; Kushwaha, A.K. Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Business—Insights from Opinions Using Big Data Analytics. Inf. Syst. Front. 2023, 25, 1351–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xu, Q.; Yan, J.; Cao, C. Emotional Communication Between Chatbots and Users: An Empirical Study on Online Customer Service System. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinform. 2022, 13336, 513–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Colace, F.; De Santo, M.; Pascale, F.; Lemma, S.; Lombardi, M. BotWheels: A petri net based Chatbot for recommending tires. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications, DATA 2017, Madrid, Spain, 24–26 July 2017; pp. 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Kshetri, N.; Hughes, L.; Slade, E.L.; Jeyaraj, A.; Kar, A.K.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Koohang, A.; Raghavan, V.; Ahuja, M.; et al. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2023, 71, 102642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Iparraguirre-Villanueva, O.; Obregon-Palomino, L.; Pujay-Iglesias, W.; Sierra-Liñan, F.; Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. Productivity of incident management with conversational bots—A review. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 2023, 12, 1543–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cao, Y.; Carmona, V.I.S.; Liu, X.; Hu, C.; Iskender, N.; Beyer, A.; Möller, S.; Polzehl, T. On the Impact of Self-efficacy on Assessment of User Experience in Customer Service Chatbot Conversations. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2022, 943, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Temple, J.G.; Burkhart, B.J.; McFadden, E.T.; Elie, C.J.; Portnoy, F. Cognitive Solutions in the Enterprise: A Case Study of UX Benefits and Challenges. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2020, 965, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Banerjee, S.; Singh, P.K.; Bajpai, J. A comparative study on decision-making capability between human and artificial intelligence. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2018, 652, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Deksne, D.; Vasiljevs, A. Collection of resources and evaluation of customer support chatbot. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 2018, 307, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Noy, S.; Zhang, W. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 2023, 381, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gilardi, F.; Alizadeh, M.; Kubli, M. ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2305016120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hassani, H.; Silva, E.S. The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces Are Revolutionizing the Field. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2023, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yue, P.; Yuan, T. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Interior Layout Design of CAD Painting. Comput.-Aided Des. Appl. 2023, 20, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Deng, Z.G.; Lv, J.; Liu, X.; Hou, Y.K. Bionic Design Model for Co-creative Product Innovation Based on Deep Generative and BID. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2023, 16, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, K. On the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Local Legislation. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Weekes, T.R.; Eskridge, T.C. Responsible Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence for the Cognitive Enhancement of Knowledge Workers. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinform. 2022, 13518, 568–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jo, Y.-W.; Kim, H.-W. Generative Adversarial Network based Cost-efficiency data Augmentation for AI Object Detection on De-palletizing Robots. J. Inst. Control Robot. Syst. 2022, 28, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hardi, R.; Pee, A.N.C.; Abdullah, M.H.L.B.; Pitogo, V.A.; Pribadi, A.S.; Rusdi, J.F. Academic Smart Chatbot to Support Emerging Artificial Intelligence Conversation. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference of Science and Information Technology in Smart Administration, ICSINTESA 2022, Denpasar, Indonesia, 10–12 November 2022; pp. 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xu, D.; Zhu, F.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, P. Improving exploration efficiency of deep reinforcement learning through samples produced by generative model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 185, 115680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hyun Baek, T.; Kim, M. Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence. Telemat. Inf. 2023, 83, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Alamleh, H.; Alqahtani, A.A.S.; Elsaid, A. Distinguishing Human-Written and ChatGPT-Generated Text Using Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, SIEDS 2023, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 27–28 April 2023; pp. 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kuang, E.; Jahangirzadeh Soure, E.; Fan, M.; Zhao, J.; Shinohara, K. Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants for UX Evaluation: Questions and How to Ask them (Voice vs. Text). In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 23–28 April 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Manshad, M.S.; Brannon, D.C. Gender-based conversational interface preferences in live chat systems for financial services. J. Financ. Serv. Mark. 2022, 28, 822–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Casadei, A.; Schlogl, S.; Bergmann, M. Chatbots for Robotic Process Automation: Investigating Perceived Trust and User Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems, ICHMS 2022, Orlando, FL, USA, 17–19 November 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gao, Z.; Jiang, J. Evaluating Human-AI Hybrid Conversational Systems with Chatbot Message Suggestions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, Gold Coast, Australia, 1–5 November 2021; pp. 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tai, W.; Zhou, F.; Trajcevski, G.; Zhong, T. Revisiting Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Speech Enhancement: Condition Collapse, Efficiency and Refinement. In Proceedings of the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2023, Washington, DC, USA, 7–14 February 2023; Volume 37, pp. 13627–13635. [Google Scholar]
  123. Subramani, M.; Jaleel, I.; Mohan, S.K. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in medical physiology university examination of phase I MBBS. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2023, 47, 270–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Roberts, I.G.; Watumull, J.; Chomsky, N. Universal Grammar. In Xenolinguistics: Towards a Science of Extraterrestrial Language Universal Grammar; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2023; pp. 165–181. [Google Scholar]
  125. Xu, M.; Niyato, D.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Kang, J.; Xiong, Z.; Mao, S.; Han, Z. Generative AI-empowered Simulation for Autonomous Driving in Vehicular Mixed Reality Metaverses. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2023, 17, 1064–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Radoi, T.-C. Artificial Intelligence in Data Analysis for Open-Source Investigations. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2023, Bucharest, Romania, 29–30 June 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jiang, F.; Ma, J.; Webster, C.J.; Chiaradia, A.J.F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X. Generative urban design: A systematic review on problem formulation, design generation, and decision-making. Prog. Plan. 2023, 180, 100795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Aydin, N.; Ayhan Erdem, O. A Research On The New Generation Artificial Intelligence Technology Generative Pretraining Transformer 3. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference, IISEC 2022, Ankara, Turkey, 15–16 December 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Perez-Castro, A.; Martínez-Torres, M.R.; Toral, S.L. Efficiency of automatic text generators for online review content generation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 189, 122380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ionuț-Alexandru, C. Experimental Results Regarding the Efficiency of Business Activities through the Use of Chatbots. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2022, 276, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rawat, B.; Bist, A.S.; Rahardja, U.; Aini, Q.; Sanjaya, Y.P.A. Recent Deep Learning Based NLP Techniques for Chatbot Development: An Exhaustive Survey. In Proceedings of the 2022 10th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2022, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 20–21 September 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rzepka, C.; Berger, B.; Hess, T. Voice Assistant vs. Chatbot—Examining the Fit between Conversational Agents’ Interaction Modalities and Information Search Tasks. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24, 839–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Borsci, S.; Malizia, A.; Schmettow, M.; van der Velde, F.; Tariverdiyeva, G.; Balaji, D.; Chamberlain, A. The Chatbot Usability Scale: The Design and Pilot of a Usability Scale for Interaction with AI-Based Conversational Agents. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2022, 26, 95–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Camargo, J.; Nunes, J.; Antunes, M.J.; Mealha, O.; Abrantes, C.; Nobrega, L. Building datasets for automated conversational systems designed for use-cases. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies, IMET 2022, Limassol, Cyprus, 4–7 October 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lee, Y.K. How complex systems get engaged in fashion design creation: Using artificial intelligence. Think. Ski. Creat. 2022, 46, 101137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mohana, P.P. A Survey of Modern Deep Learning based Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication, ICCMC 2022, Erode, India, 29–31 March 2022; pp. 1146–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kathirvelu, M.; Janaranjani, A.; Navin Pranav, A.T.; Pradeep, R. Voice Recognition Chat bot for Consumer Product Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Information System, ICDSIS 2022, Hassan, India, 29–30 July 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Nadiyah, K.; Dewi, G.S. Quality Control Analysis Using Flowchart, Check Sheet, P-Chart, Pareto Diagram and Fishbone Diagram. Ind. Syst. Optim. J. 2022, 15, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Waltman, L. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J. Informetr. 2010, 4, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. George, D.; Lehrach, W.; Kansky, K.; Lázaro-Gredilla, M.; Laan, C.; Marthi, B.; Lou, X.; Meng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. A generative vision model that trains with high data efficiency and breaks text-based CAPTCHAs. Science 2017, 358, eaag2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Grover, T.; Rowan, K.; Suh, J.; McDuff, D.; Czerwinski, M. Design and evaluation of intelligent agent prototypes for assistance with focus and productivity at work. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. 2020, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sperlì, G. A Cultural heritage framework using a Deep Learning based Chatbot for supporting tourist journey. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 183, 115277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Dowling, M.; Lucey, B. ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 53, 103662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ali, H.; Aysan, A.F. What will ChatGPT revolutionize in the financial industry? Mod. Financ. 2023, 1, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.