Next Article in Journal
The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Integration in the Relationship Between Supply Chain Strategy and Logistics Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Transitioning Design-Orienting Scenarios for Food Systems: A Design Contribution to Explore Sustainable Solutions and Steer Action
Previous Article in Journal
The Visual Greenery Field: Representing the Urban Green Visual Continuum with Street View Image Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Blue in Food and Beverages—A Review of Socio-Cultural, Economic, and Environmental Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Women’s Leadership in Sustainable Agriculture: Preserving Traditional Knowledge Through Home Gardens in Santa Maria Jacatepec, Oaxaca

by
Marco Aurelio Acevedo-Ortiz
1,*,
Gema Lugo-Espinosa
1,
Yolanda Donají Ortiz-Hernández
2,*,
Rafael Pérez-Pacheco
2,
Fernando Elí Ortiz-Hernández
3 and
Carlos Alejandro Granados-Echegoyen
1
1
Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT)-Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Oaxaca, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán 71230, Oaxaca, Mexico
2
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Oaxaca, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlán 71230, Oaxaca, Mexico
3
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacán, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04440, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9513; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219513
Submission received: 25 September 2024 / Revised: 29 October 2024 / Accepted: 31 October 2024 / Published: 31 October 2024

Abstract

:
Rural communities in Oaxaca face challenges such as food insecurity, economic instability, and the loss of traditional agricultural knowledge. Home gardens, once essential for food production and income generation, have declined due to migration, environmental degradation, and modern agricultural pressures. This study evaluated how community-driven models, supported by crowdfunding, can revitalize home gardens to improve food security, build community resilience, and promote economic empowerment. A mixed-methods approach, including household surveys, interviews, and focus groups, was used to assess the impact of these gardens. The results showed that over 70% of households experienced improved food security and reduced reliance on external food sources. Home garden production also led to a 20% reduction in food expenses, and the sale of surplus crops provided additional income, enhancing household economic stability. Women’s involvement in agricultural decision-making increased, fostering empowerment within both family and community contexts. Traditional practices, such as seed saving and organic pest control, were maintained, contributing to the ecological sustainability of the gardens. Crowdfunding was an effective tool for financing home gardens, boosting community engagement and strengthening social bonds. The findings highlight the potential of integrating traditional knowledge with modern funding strategies to create resilient, sustainable agricultural systems in rural Oaxaca.

1. Introduction

Home gardens have long been a cornerstone of small-scale agricultural systems in rural Mexico, particularly in Oaxaca, where they are crucial for food security, biodiversity conservation, and the preservation of traditional agricultural knowledge [1,2,3]. These biodiverse plots, typically located near homes, provide households with fresh food, medicinal plants, and small-scale livestock production [2]. Beyond their immediate contributions to household sustenance, home gardens play a vital role in promoting food sovereignty by enabling families to control their food production and maintain agricultural practices deeply rooted in local cultural traditions [4,5].
However, despite their numerous benefits, home gardens have been steadily declining across rural Mexico in recent decades [6]. One of the primary drivers of this decline is rural-to-urban migration, particularly among younger generations seeking better economic opportunities [7,8]. This migration has disrupted the intergenerational transmission of traditional agricultural knowledge, weakening the continuity of home garden practices [9]. At the same time, the rise of industrial agriculture—favoring monoculture and large-scale production—has marginalized home gardens, pushing aside their more sustainable, biodiversity-friendly practices in favor of commercial crops [10]. Furthermore, environmental degradation and shifting land-use priorities have compounded these pressures, making it increasingly difficult for rural communities to maintain these once-essential systems [11].
In Oaxaca, women have historically been at the forefront of both household and agricultural activities, particularly in managing home gardens that provide essential food and medicinal plants for their families [12]. Despite their central role in ensuring household food security, women’s contributions are often undervalued, seen as extensions of domestic responsibilities rather than formal agricultural work [13,14]. Traditionally, men have dominated public agricultural decision-making, while women’s roles have remained confined to the private sphere, limiting their participation in community leadership and economic activities [15]. Yet, women’s involvement in home gardens is not only essential for household sustenance but also for preserving agricultural biodiversity and transmitting traditional knowledge across generations [16]. Recognizing and overcoming these cultural and structural barriers is critical to unlocking the full potential of women’s contributions to rural agricultural systems [17,18,19].
As home gardens decline and women continue to face barriers in agricultural leadership, innovative solutions are needed to revitalize these systems and promote equitable participation. One promising approach is social crowdfunding, which provides a decentralized and accessible means of financing community-driven projects, particularly in regions where traditional financial institutions are less accessible [20,21,22,23]. For indigenous and rural communities in Oaxaca, crowdfunding offers a valuable opportunity to secure resources for restoring home gardens, purchasing seeds, and improving infrastructure [24]. More than just a financial tool, crowdfunding connects local initiatives with broader networks of support, fostering social cohesion and collective ownership of agricultural projects [22]. By giving communities control over their development projects, crowdfunding empowers marginalized groups, allowing them to bypass institutional barriers and align agricultural initiatives with their cultural and ecological values [25,26].
This context of declining home gardens and marginalized communities highlights the case of Vega del Sol, a small area within the municipality of Santa María Jacatepec, which was classified as a priority attention zone due to its high levels of marginalization and socio-economic underdevelopment [27,28]. Approximately 30% of the population identifies as Afro-Mexican, adding to the region’s rich cultural diversity [29]. However, despite this cultural richness, the community faces significant challenges: nearly 29% of the population lives in extreme poverty, a result of limited access to essential services, educational opportunities, and economic mobility [30]. The region’s rugged terrain and relative isolation exacerbate these socio-economic issues, restricting access to markets, healthcare, and education, thereby contributing to the high levels of social vulnerability.
Vega del Sol serves as an ideal location for studying the complex interplay between cultural, environmental, and economic factors. This region provides a critical case study for examining the challenges and opportunities related to rural development, food security, and environmental conservation. In particular, the community’s experience highlights the potential of home gardens not only as tools for subsistence and cultural preservation but also as a means to address socio-economic challenges through sustainable agricultural practices [31].
This study aims to address these gaps by exploring how community-driven initiatives, supported by crowdfunding, can revitalize home gardens in Oaxaca as a sustainable approach to improving food security, community resilience, and economic empowerment. The specific objectives are to assess the impact of home gardens on food security and household economic stability in rural communities, evaluate the effectiveness of crowdfunding as a financial mechanism for sustaining home gardens, explore the role of women in agricultural decision-making within home garden projects, focusing on their contributions to community leadership and empowerment, and examine how traditional agricultural knowledge is preserved and transmitted through home gardens, and its role in sustaining rural livelihoods.
By focusing on these objectives, this research seeks to demonstrate the potential of home gardens as a sustainable solution to contemporary socio-economic and environmental challenges. The findings will contribute to broader discussions on sustainable development, with particular relevance to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site Location

The study was conducted in La Chinantla, Oaxaca, one of the most biologically diverse regions in Mexico [32,33]. This region’s extraordinary biodiversity has made it a focal point for conservation efforts and sustainable agricultural practices [31,34], which are critical for the livelihoods of indigenous and rural communities [34]. Agricultural activities, particularly the cultivation of traditional crops in home gardens, are closely linked to the cultural identity and environmental stewardship of the indigenous population, who rely on these practices for both subsistence and the preservation of their cultural heritage [31,34,35,36].
The specific study area focused on the ejido of Vega del Sol, located within La Chinantla in the municipality of Santa María Jacatepec (Figure 1). Vega del Sol is a rural community with a population of 1225 residents, composed of 658 women and 567 men. Among these, 6.29% of women and 2.78% of men are illiterate. Additionally, 96.41% of the population identifies as indigenous, with 72.73% speaking Chinantec as indigenous language, underscoring the community’s deep-rooted cultural traditions that continue to shape everyday life [37]. Of the total population, 693 individuals fall within the working-age range of 15 to 59 years, playing a key role in supporting subsistence farming and local economic activities.

2.2. Research Design

A mixed-methods approach was employed to address the research objective, integrating both quantitative and qualitative data to assess the revitalization of home gardens in Oaxaca. The study, conducted from 2020 to 2022, focused on three primary areas: (a) food security and sustainability, (b) community resilience and empowerment, and (c) the preservation of traditional agricultural knowledge. A theoretical model (Figure 2) was developed to support the long-term sustainability and adaptability of home gardens, specifically through community-driven efforts and crowdfunding initiatives.

2.2.1. Household Surveys

Quantitative data were collected through structured household surveys (Figure A1) conducted with 30 households in Vega del Sol, selected using a non-probabilistic snowball sampling method. While the sample size may appear modest, it was deemed appropriate given the rural and isolated nature of the community, allowing for an in-depth exploration of household-level impacts. The survey included sections on demographics (age, gender, income), the use of home gardens, crop diversity, and their impact on food security. Additionally, it focused on agricultural practices, such as types of crops grown and methods used, to assess how home gardens contributed to household sustenance. Special attention was paid to the economic benefits of home gardens, including cost savings on food and any income generated from surplus produce. This approach provided a comprehensive understanding of both the socio-economic and food security dynamics in the community, helping to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of home garden initiatives in improving local livelihoods.

2.2.2. Interviews and Focus Groups

Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews (Figure A2) with a total of 30 participants, consisting of community authorities and key stakeholders actively involved in home gardening. These interviews aimed to gather insights into traditional agricultural practices, gender roles, decision-making processes, and the challenges faced by women in taking on leadership roles within the agricultural sector. The selection of participants was purposeful, targeting individuals who held significant influence in the community or were directly engaged in managing home gardens.
Additionally, focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with women and community leaders to explore the cultural significance of home gardens and to assess the potential of crowdfunding as a tool for supporting community-driven agricultural projects. Participants were also asked to rate their perceptions of home gardens on a 5-point Likert scale, evaluating their contributions to food security, household resilience, and income generation [38].

2.2.3. Food Security and Economic Data

Food security was assessed using an adapted methodology [39,40], tailored to the local context incorporating 5-point Likert scales [38], to measure food availability and accessibility. Data on the economic benefits of home gardens included reductions in food expenses, income generation from surplus sales, and market participation, focusing on how home gardens provide economic relief for households. Key socioeconomic indicators such as income, savings from self-sufficiency, and local market involvement were measured to analyze the gardens’ economic impact on household livelihoods.

2.2.4. Crowdfunding Experiment

An experimental component was integrated into the study to assess the viability of social crowdfunding as a tool for financing home garden initiatives. Social crowdfunding, in this context, involves raising funds by appealing to a broad audience, typically through online platforms, to support specific community-driven projects. The crowdfunding campaign was carefully designed in collaboration with community members, with the primary goal of generating financial resources for expanding or improving home gardens [24,41].
The process began with the creation of a narrative that highlighted the importance of home gardens for food security, sustainability, and community resilience. This narrative was shared with potential donors through digital platforms and local networks, emphasizing the specific financial goals and timelines set for the campaign. The strategy involved engaging the community directly, both in the design and promotion phases, to foster local ownership and ensure active participation.
The pilot crowdfunding campaign aimed to raise funds specifically for the establishment of 30 home gardens. Key metrics for assessing the success of the crowdfunding approach included the total funds raised, the level of community engagement, and external support from broader networks. This campaign provided a framework for evaluating the potential of social crowdfunding as an ongoing resource for supporting future agricultural initiatives.
Crowdfunding was intended to be a flexible and adaptable tool, capable of being used in the long term whenever additional funding was required. Its implementation in this study was aimed at determining not only its immediate financial viability but also its potential for sustained community engagement and donor involvement over time.

2.3. Data Analysis

Quantitative data from the household surveys were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2021 to identify trends in food security, crop diversity, and economic impact. Key socio-economic indicators, such as income from home gardens and savings from self-sufficiency, were analyzed to assess the economic benefits to households. Qualitative data from interviews and FGDs were analyzed thematically to highlight the role of women in agricultural decision-making, community participation, and the preservation of traditional agricultural knowledge.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evaluation of the Conceptual Model for Home Garden Adoption and Community Engagement

The conceptual model for home garden adoption and community engagement (Figure 2) was implemented in a structured manner, divided into three distinct phases. This approach was designed to ensure the long-term sustainability and success of home gardens within the community of Vega del Sol. The model focused on fostering active participation, particularly among women, in decision-making processes. By doing so, it aimed to enhance the overall functionality of home gardens and strengthen community engagement, setting the foundation for the subsequent phases.

3.1.1. Stage One: Organizational Foundations

In the initial phase, the model laid the groundwork by assessing family structures and community dynamics [42,43]. This stage was critical in identifying the space each family could allocate for the gardens, which ranged in size from 15 to 30 square meters, and understanding women’s roles in decision-making. Traditionally, women have had limited involvement in agricultural decisions [44], but this phase established the importance of including them in the planning process [44,45,46,47]. A baseline of male and female beneficiaries’ perceptions toward home gardens was generated (Table 1), highlighting the initial challenges women faced. Notably, of the 21 women participating, 38.10% rated their experience as “Bad” and “Very Bad”, and 28.57% as “Regular”. However, 33.33% perceived their involvement as “Good” or “Very Good”, indicating that despite traditional barriers, many women saw the potential benefits of home gardens from the beginning [42]. These baseline perceptions were crucial in guiding gender inclusivity efforts and ensuring women’s participation in the subsequent phases [12].

3.1.2. Stage Two: Inclusive Planning and Strategy Development

During this phase, the model (Figure 3) emphasized active participation from all family members, particularly women. The participants who became directly involved were between the ages of 29 and 45, which facilitated the transmission of indigenous agricultural practices to younger generations. This active engagement helped ensure the preservation of traditional knowledge while integrating modern strategies. Women were involved in selecting crop varieties that would best suit local climatic conditions and meet household consumption needs [4,48].
In addition, financial strategies were developed to support long-term sustainability [24], with workshops on fundraising and financial management playing a pivotal role in the model’s success [18,49,50]. The introduction of the crowdfunding component during this phase further strengthened community involvement, as it encouraged collective participation in raising funds for the development and expansion of home gardens [16,24,51].

3.1.3. Stage Three: Implementation and Community Empowerment

The final stage was focused on the actual implementation of home gardens. Women’s roles in managing the gardens were strengthened and recognized by the community (Figure 4), illustrating the shift in women’s involvement from supportive tasks to taking leadership in decision-making processes at both the family and community levels. This empowerment of women not only enhanced their participation but also ensured that the gardens were effectively managed and sustained over time [52,53,54].
The model incorporated a monitoring aspect to track the home garden activities and facilitated self-assessment, enabling participants to reflect on their progress, exchange experiences, and address challenges collectively. The community’s ability to adapt and support each other played a crucial role in ensuring the long-term success of these gardens [19,47].

3.2. Impact of Home Gardens on Food Security and Economic Benefits

The analysis showed that 42.33% of households rated their access to food as “Good” and 23.33% rated it as “Very Good” highlighting the significant positive impact (70%) of home gardens on food security. Additionally, 46.67% of households reported that they experienced “Good” levels of savings due to home garden production, further reducing financial pressure from food expenses. These findings underscore the vital role that home gardens played in improving both food availability and economic stability for the surveyed households.
This shift allowed these families to reduce their reliance on external food sources. By providing consistent access to fresh, nutritious produce throughout the year, home gardens also strengthened household resilience, particularly during times of economic instability and fluctuating food prices [3,40].
Furthermore, improvements in food security were accompanied by notable economic benefits. A total of 76.67% of households (HH) reported successful crop harvests during the growing cycle, with many producing surplus vegetables that were sold in local markets. This not only supplemented household income but also strengthened the local food system, fostering sustainability and economic resilience within the community (Table 2).
Additionally, home gardens helped reduce food expenses by an average of 19.72%, as families relied less on external food sources. For simplicity, this reduction was rounded to approximately 20% in the text. Surplus produce sold in local markets generated extra income, which further contributed to the economic stability of these households [39,40]. Table 3 shows a notable increase in the percentage of households generating income from surplus sales compared to the initial stages of implementation, where few families reported any economic benefit from home gardens. This additional income not only provided families with the means to invest in other household needs, such as education or healthcare but also created a buffer against economic uncertainties, ultimately improving livelihoods.
Furthermore, the practice of selling surplus produce strengthened local market participation, fostering stronger connections within the local economy. This dynamic reinforced community ties, as households became active contributors to the local food system. It also promoted sustainability through localized food production, reducing dependency on external food sources and encouraging circular economies within the community [2,55]. The economic benefits, combined with improved food security, highlight the holistic impact of home gardens on both household and community well-being, as shown in Table 3.
Crop diversity was also noted as a key factor, with households cultivating a variety of fruits (Table 4), vegetables, and medicinal plants. This diversity not only improved household nutrition but also reduced reliance on external food sources, further contributing to food security [38,41]. The inclusion of medicinal plants such as plants such as Blackberry herb (Solanum nigrescens) and Acuyo or hierba santa (Piper auritum) was particularly important, as it allowed families to access natural remedies, which could in turn reduce healthcare costs and enhance overall well-being [56]. Additionally, the cultivation of a wide range of crops such as staple grains like corn (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus spp.) provides resilience against seasonal changes and climate variability, ensuring that households have a consistent food supply throughout the year. This diversity also fostered the preservation of local plant species such as sweet potato (Ipomea batata), cassava (Manihot esculenta), and chayote (Sechium edule) and agricultural knowledge, further promoting sustainable agricultural practices within the community.

3.3. Role of Women in Agricultural Management and Decision-Making

The implementation model (Figure 2) was particularly effective in transforming the role of women within agricultural management. Prior to the initiative, women had limited involvement in agricultural decision-making, as these roles were typically reserved for men [52,53,54]. However, through the model’s inclusive planning and training efforts, women became more actively involved in selecting crops, organizing garden maintenance, and managing finances related to surplus produce sales [18,52,57].
A notable shift in women’s roles and perceptions was observed when comparing the initial perceptions in Table 1 to the final results in Table 5. Initially, Table 1 showed that 38.10% of 21 women rated their involvement in agricultural decision-making as “Bad” or “Very Bad”, while only 33.33% viewed their participation as “Good” or “Very Good”. However, after the implementation, Table 5 reveals a marked improvement: the percentage of women rating their involvement as “Bad and Very Bad” dropped to 4.76%, while those rating it as “Regular” increased to 38.10%. Notably, 57.14% of women now rated their involvement in agricultural management as “Good” or “Very Good”, highlighting the success in empowering women.
This shift in gender roles and increased engagement in decision-making contributed significantly to the women’s sense of empowerment and their ability to lead agricultural initiatives, not only within the household but also at the community level [12]. The improved perception of women regarding their roles in home gardens demonstrates the model’s effectiveness in fostering inclusive agricultural management and leadership.
Beyond the household, women also became more engaged in community meetings where key agricultural and development decisions were made. The model emphasized the importance of women’s participation in these forums, ensuring that they had the opportunity to voice their opinions and contribute to collective decision-making processes [57]. As a result, women began to take on more visible leadership roles within the community, influencing broader agricultural policies and community planning efforts. Their involvement in these meetings not only expanded their influence but also strengthened community cohesion by ensuring that a wider range of perspectives was considered in the decision-making process as mentioned in similar studies related to gender [18,54].
This increased participation allowed women to advocate for resources, training, and support that aligned with their families’ needs, particularly in terms of food security and sustainable agricultural practices. The ability to speak in community assemblies and influence agricultural policies is a critical step toward gender equity in the community. Furthermore, this engagement contributed to a more inclusive and resilient community structure, where women’s contributions were recognized as vital to both the economic and social development of the community [12,45,52,58].

3.4. Preservation of Traditional Agricultural Knowledge

The initiative played a crucial role in preserving and transmitting traditional agricultural knowledge, particularly through the active participation of elder community members. One key practice passed down was seed saving. Elders shared techniques for selecting, storing, and maintaining seeds from one season to the next, ensuring the availability of resilient, locally adapted varieties. This practice reduced dependence on external seed sources and contributed to maintaining biodiversity within the home gardens [59,60].
The involvement of both men and women in these seed recovery efforts was significant, as illustrated in Figure 5, which shows the participation of male and female household members in the recovery of local seeds and plants. The figure highlights that women played a crucial role in ensuring the continuity of these practices. This collaborative effort between genders emphasizes the collective responsibility to preserve biodiversity and maintain the resilience of home gardens.
Women were particularly essential in integrating traditional seed-saving practices into modern agricultural activities, facilitating the transmission of knowledge to younger generations. This intergenerational transfer of knowledge not only helped to maintain the genetic diversity of crops but also contributed to the long-term ecological resilience of the community’s agricultural systems [15,61,62]. Through their active participation, women helped safeguard both the cultural heritage and environmental sustainability of their home gardens.
Moreover, the involvement of women in this process was essential. Women played a key role in ensuring that seed-saving traditions were integrated into modern agricultural practices and shared with younger generations, thereby contributing to both the cultural sustainability of the community and the ecological resilience of the home gardens.
Another significant contribution was the knowledge of organic pest control methods [63,64,65]. Elders passed down techniques to younger generations on how to use natural ingredients like herbs in biocompounds and companion planting to manage pests without relying on chemical pesticides. These organic practices promoted ecological balance and soil health in the home gardens, while also reducing costs for families by eliminating the need for expensive chemical treatments.
The use of biocompounds in home gardens, classified by the gender of the person responsible within the household, highlights the notable involvement of women in adopting and applying these organic methods (Figure 6). The data reveal that a significant proportion of women-led households were responsible for the use of biocompounds, illustrating their central role in implementing sustainable pest control practices. This gender-based analysis reflects how women’s participation in agricultural management has expanded beyond traditional roles, contributing directly to the ecological health of the home gardens.
The widespread adoption of biocompounds underscores the importance of these organic methods [63,66,67] in maintaining soil quality and reducing pest infestations (Figure 6). Women, who were primarily responsible for daily garden activities, were integral in ensuring the success of these practices. Their involvement not only strengthened their leadership in agricultural decision-making but also fostered a more sustainable and cost-effective approach to pest management within the community [52,58].

3.5. Crowdfunding Experiment and Community Resilience

The pilot crowdfunding campaign was successful in raising sufficient funds to establish 30 home gardens [24]. It demonstrated that crowdfunding is a viable tool for financing community-led agricultural projects and increasing participation in local initiatives [68]. The community actively contributed both financially and through in-kind support, such as labor for garden construction and maintenance [51]. This collective involvement strengthened a sense of ownership, with the gardens being viewed as a shared community resource rather than individual family assets.
The campaign also fostered collective responsibility and resilience within the community [69]. Working together to raise funds and implement the gardens created trust and solidarity, as the shared goal of improving food security united participants in mutual support and collaboration [70]. By relying on internal resources and reducing dependence on external institutions, the crowdfunding initiative overcame traditional barriers to funding in rural communities [21,71].
Additionally, the campaign raised awareness of food security issues and attracted external supporters interested in sustainable agricultural practices [25,68]. This external involvement expanded the community’s network and brought new resources, fostering connections with organizations interested in food sovereignty and sustainability [72].
Managing the funds and implementing the gardens promoted transparency and strengthened social bonds, as community members worked side-by-side, sharing knowledge and troubleshooting challenges. The success of this initiative not only improved food security and economic opportunities but also laid the foundation for future collaborative initiatives in the community.

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that home gardens play a critical role in enhancing food security, economic stability, and the preservation of traditional agricultural knowledge in rural Oaxaca. By integrating community-driven initiatives with modern crowdfunding mechanisms, the project empowered women to take on more active leadership roles in agricultural decision-making, thus contributing to sustainable rural development. The increased involvement of women in managing home gardens not only improved household food production but also enhanced their influence on broader agricultural policies within the community, aligning with the objectives of SDG 5 (Gender Equality) by promoting greater inclusivity and equity.
The revitalization of home gardens resulted in notable improvements in household food security, with over 70% of households reporting improved access to fresh and nutritious produce, alongside a 20% reduction in food-related expenditures. Furthermore, the surplus production of crops offered families additional income streams, thus contributing to economic stability and resilience, in support of SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). The findings highlight the utility of crowdfunding as an effective financial mechanism for rural communities, enabling them to overcome traditional barriers to funding while fostering social cohesion and collective ownership of agricultural initiatives.
Moreover, the project facilitated the preservation of traditional agricultural practices, such as seed saving and organic pest control, which contributed not only to ecological sustainability but also to the safeguarding of cultural heritage. These practices, alongside the fostering of intergenerational knowledge exchange, reinforced the long-term resilience of home gardens, supporting the objectives of SDG 15 (Life on Land), which emphasizes biodiversity conservation through sustainable land-use practices.
While the study is focused on rural Oaxaca, the results offer valuable lessons with broader international implications. Rural and indigenous communities worldwide face similar challenges, such as food insecurity, environmental degradation, and the marginalization of women in agricultural leadership. The integration of traditional agricultural practices with crowdfunding presents a replicable model for addressing these global challenges. Communities in diverse settings could benefit from applying the strategies demonstrated in this study, making this research relevant not only in Mexico but also on an international scale. By implementing these strategies, communities across the globe can address contemporary socio-economic and environmental challenges while preserving cultural heritage and promoting resilience.
However, this study is not without limitations. Conducted as a pilot project in a geographically isolated and marginalized community, the scope and sample size were constrained, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other regions with differing socio-economic or environmental conditions. Additionally, the relatively short duration of the study limited the ability to assess the long-term sustainability of home gardens. Future research should address these limitations by undertaking larger-scale, longitudinal studies across diverse rural settings, incorporating a broader range of socio-economic and environmental variables to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the role of home gardens in achieving sustainable development goals.
In conclusion, this research highlights the transformative potential of home gardens in promoting food security, empowering women, and supporting sustainable agricultural practices. By leveraging community-driven initiatives and crowdfunding, rural communities worldwide can address contemporary socio-economic and environmental challenges, while preserving cultural heritage and fostering long-term resilience.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.A.-O. and Y.D.O.-H.; Data curation, C.A.G.-E.; Formal analysis, M.A.A.-O. and Y.D.O.-H.; Funding acquisition, F.E.O.-H.; Investigation, M.A.A.-O., G.L.-E., F.E.O.-H. and C.A.G.-E.; Resources, Y.D.O.-H. and R.P.-P.; Supervision, R.P.-P.; Validation, G.L.-E.; Writing—original draft, M.A.A.-O.; Writing—review and editing, M.A.A.-O., G.L.-E. and Y.D.O.-H. All authors will be informed about each step of manuscript processing including submission, revision, revision reminder, etc. via emails from our system or assigned Assistant Editor. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by EcoLogic Development Fund 2021-2022 on the GlobalGiving platform 36387 with social crowdfunding. The first author received a postdoctoral fellowship 216103 from CONAHCYT, at the Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Oaxaca SIP20220404.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado of the Insituto Politénico Nacional with the reference number SIP20220404.

Informed Consent Statement

The consent of the participants was obtained to carry out the study and gather information.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the backing of the EcoLogic Development Fund, Fondo Ambiental Regional de la Chinantla, Oaxaca, A.C., and the Instituto Politécnico Nacional for their support; as well as Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT) and Sistema Nacional de Investigadoras e Investigadores (SNII-CONAHCYT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Format for Structured Household Surveys.
Figure A1. Format for Structured Household Surveys.
Sustainability 16 09513 g0a1
Figure A2. Questionnaire Format for Semi-Structured Focus Groups.
Figure A2. Questionnaire Format for Semi-Structured Focus Groups.
Sustainability 16 09513 g0a2

References

  1. Korpelainen, H. The Role of Home Gardens in Promoting Biodiversity and Food Security. Plants 2023, 12, 2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Montagnini, F. Homegardens of Mesoamerica: Biodiversity, Food Security, and Nutrient Management. In Tropical Homegardens. Advances in Agroforestry; Kumar, B.M., Nair, P.K.R., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 3, pp. 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Galhena, D.H.; Freed, R.; Maredia, K.M. Home Gardens: A Promising Approach to Enhance Household Food Security and Wellbeing. Agric. Food Secur. 2013, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aguilar-Støen, M.; Moe, S.R.; Camargo-Ricalde, S.L. Home Gardens Sustain Crop Diversity and Improve Farm Resilience in Candelaria Loxicha, Oaxaca, Mexico. Hum. Ecol. 2009, 37, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Castañeda-Navarrete, J. Homegarden Diversity and Food Security in Southern Mexico. Food Secur. 2021, 13, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Niñez, V. Household Gardens: Theoretical and Policy Considerations. Agric. Syst. 1987, 23, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gil-García, Ó.F.; Akalin, N.; Bové, F.; Vener, S. Understanding the Mobilities of Indigenous Migrant Youth across the Americas. Soc. Sci. 2024, 13, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Selod, H.; Shilpi, F. Rural-Urban Migration in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Literature. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2021, 91, 103713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meza-Jiménez, M.D.L.; Pacheco-Cruz, R. Aspectos Socioeconómicos y de Seguridad Alimentaria En Comunidades de Muy Alta Marginación Pertenecientes a Oaxaca, México. Salud Adm. 2021, 8, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  10. Calvet-Mir, L.; Riu-Bosoms, C.; González-Puente, M.; Ruiz-Mallén, I.; Reyes-García, V.; Molina, J.L. The Transmission of Home Garden Knowledge: Safeguarding Biocultural Diversity and Enhancing Social–Ecological Resilience. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2016, 29, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Grammont, H.C. La evolución de la producción agropecuaria en el campo mexicano: Concentración productiva, pobreza y pluriactividad. Andamios 2010, 7, 85–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cruz-Yáñez, L.A. El Papel de Las Mujeres En Los Huertos Familiares. Altern. Psicol. 2016, 4, 46–60. [Google Scholar]
  13. Alberti-Manzanares, P.; Hernandez, M.Z.; Salcido-Ramos, B.; Real-Luna, N. Género, Economía Del Cuidado y Pago Del Trabajo Doméstico Rural En Jilotepec, Estado de México. Agric. Soc. Desarro. 2014, 11, 379–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruiz-López, P.; Pullas-Tapia, P.; Parra-Parra, C.A.; Zamora-Sánchez, R. La Doble Presencia En Las Trabajadoras Femeninas: Equilibrio Entre El Trabajo y La Vida Familiar. Rev. Comun. SEECI 2017, 1, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reina-Aoyama, L. Las Mujeres Zapotecas Del Istmo de Tehuantepec—México En El Siglo XIX. Available online: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/68503 (accessed on 20 August 2024).
  16. Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Aquino-Bolaños, T. Huertos Familiares y Participación Comunitaria Para La Generación de Medios de Vida Sostenibles. In Los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible Versus la Pandemia de la COVID-19; Tavera-Cortés, M.E., Ed.; ASMIIA: Texcoco, México, 2023; pp. 125–138. ISBN 978-607-596-753-0. [Google Scholar]
  17. Castro-Apreza, I. La Participación Política de Las Mujeres Indígenas En México: Oportunidades y Desafíos. Desacatos 2011, 1, 215–221. [Google Scholar]
  18. El Khateeb, S.; Saber, M.; Shawket, I.M. Urban Reflections through Home Gardening; Does Gender Matter? Ain Shams Eng. J. 2023, 14, 101885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gripenberg, L. Social Change of an Indigenous Community: A Case Study of the Community-Based Cooperative “Millennial Women” in Oaxaca, Mexico. Bachelor’s Thesis, Lund Universitet, Lund, Sweden, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Filimonova, N.G.; Ozerova, M.G.; Ermakova, I.N.; Miheeva, N.B. Crowdfunding as the Way of Projects Financing in Agribusiness. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 315, 022098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hamlin, N.; Lake, B. An Initial Investigation into GlobalGiving’s Impact on Nonprofit Organizations. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3252703 (accessed on 24 September 2024).
  22. Li, Y.M.; Wu, J.D.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Liou, J.H. A Social Fundraising Mechanism for Charity Crowdfunding. Decis. Support Syst. 2020, 129, 113170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Motylska-Kuzma, A. Crowdfunding and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Pérez-Pacheco, R. Construyendo Capacidades Locales Para Obtener Financiamiento Colectivo e Implementar Huertos Familiares En La Chinantla, Oaxaca. In Los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible Versus la Pandemia de la COVID-19; Tavera-Cortés, M.E., Ed.; ASMIIA: Texcoco, México, 2023; pp. 112–124. ISBN 978-607-596-753-0. [Google Scholar]
  25. Iniesta, J.M.E.; Peñalver, A.J.B.; Gómez, E.H. La Financiación Del Emprendimiento Social: Estudio de La Comunicación y El Uso de Las Redes Sociales En La Plataforma de Crowdfunding “Goteo”. CIRIEC-Esp. Rev. Econ. Pública Soc. Coop. 2022, 1, 199–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sánchez, W.M.; Tonon, L.B. Señalización y El Éxito de Las Campañas de Crowdfunding Latinoamericano. RETOS Rev. Cienc. Adm. Econ. 2020, 10, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Estados Unidos Mexicanos DECRETO Por El Que Se Formula La Declaratoria de Las Zonas de Atención Prioritaria Para El Año 2023. Available online: https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5672639&fecha=28/11/2022#gsc.tab=0 (accessed on 30 June 2023).
  28. Pueblos América. Santa María Jacatepec. Vega Del Sol. Available online: https://mexico.pueblosamerica.com/i/vega-del-sol/ (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  29. DataMéxico Santa María Jacatepec: Economía, Empleo, Equidad, Calidad de Vida, Educación, Salud y Seguridad Pública. Data México. Available online: https://www.economia.gob.mx/datamexico/es/profile/geo/santa-maria-jacatepec (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  30. MIDO-Sistema de Monitoreo de Indicadores de Desempeño de Oaxaca. Available online: https://mido.oaxaca.gob.mx/home/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
  31. Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Ortiz-Hernández, F.E.; Martínez-Tomás, S.H.; Tavera-Cortés, M.E. Nature-Based Solutions for Conservation and Food Sovereignty in Indigenous Communities of Oaxaca. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cedeño-Valdiviezo, A.; Torres-Lima, P. La Chinantla Oaxaqueña: La Historia de Un Patrimonio Perdido. Diseño Soc. 2015, 1, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernández-Montiel, J.L. La Chinantla, Fuente de Agua, Fuente de Vida. Available online: https://agua.org.mx/biblioteca/la-chinantla-fuente-de-agua-fuente-de-vida-sp-5128/ (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  34. Berget, C.; Duran, E.; Bray, D.B. Participatory Restoration of Degraded Agricultural Areas Invaded by Bracken Fern (Pteridium Aquilinum) and Conservation in the Chinantla Region, Oaxaca, Mexico. Hum. Ecol. 2015, 43, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D. Percepciones Comunitarias Sobre Mecanismos de Conservación de Recursos Naturales Bajo Un Enfoque Paisajístico En Tres Ejidos de La Chinantla, Oaxaca. In Aproximaciones Teórico-Metodológicas para el Análisis Territorial y el Desarrollo Regional Sostenible; Martínez-Pellegrini, S.E., Sarmiento-Franco, J.F., Valles-Aragón, M.C., Eds.; Recuperación transformadora de los territorios con equidad y sostenibilidad; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Asociación Mexicana de Ciencias para el Desarrollo Regional: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 1–18. ISBN 978-607-30-5332-7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Aquino-Bolaños, T.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Ortiz-Hernández, F.E.; Pérez-Pacheco, R.; López-Cruz, J.Y. Cultural Heritage, Migration, and Land Use Transformation in San José Chiltepec, Oaxaca. Land 2024, 13, 1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evso Estadísticas de Vega Del Sol, Santa María Jacatepec, Oaxaca. Available online: https://mexico.pueblosamerica.com/i/vega-del-sol/ (accessed on 30 June 2023).
  38. Matas, A. Diseño Del Formato de Escalas Tipo Likert: Un Estado de La Cuestión. Rev. Electron. Investig. Educ. 2018, 20, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aguilar-Estrada, A.E.; Caamal-Cauich, I.; Barrios-Puente, G.; Ortiz-Rosales, M.A. ¿Hambre En México? Una Alternativa Metodológica Para Medir Seguridad Alimentaria. Estud. Soc. Rev. Aliment. Contemp. Desarro. Reg. 2019, 29, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shamah-Levy, T.; Mundo-Rosas, V.; Flores-De la Vega, M.M.; Luiselli-Fernández, C. Food Security Governance in Mexico: How Can It Be Improved? Glob. Food Secur. 2017, 14, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Home Gardens for 100 Families, Oaxaca, Mexico. Available online: https://www.objective.earth/Home_Gardens_for_100_Families,_Oaxaca,_Mexico/ (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  42. Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Ortiz-Hernández, F.E. Herramientas Metodológicas En Procesos Participativos En Comunidades Rurales Para La Conservación de Recursos Naturales; Tavera-Cortés, M.E., Ed.; Editorial ASMIIA: Texcoco, Estado de México, 2022; pp. 93–106. ISBN 978-607-99921-0-1. [Google Scholar]
  43. González, B.; Peña, M.; Rincón, N.; Bustillo, L.; Urdaneta, F. Formulación de Lineamientos Estratégicos Para El Desarrollo Rural, Basado En Una Metodología Participativa. Rev. Fac. Agron. 2004, 21, 398–414. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jayachandran, S. Social Norms as a Barrier to Women’s Employment in Developing Countries. IMF Econ. Rev. 2021, 69, 576–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Anand, M.; Mecagni, A.; Piracha, M. Practical Tools and Frameworks for Measuring Agency in Women’s Economic Empowerment; SEEP Network: Camberwell, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cronkleton, P.; Evans, K.; Addoah, T.; Dumont, E.S.; Zida, M.; Djoudi, H. Using Participatory Approaches to Enhance Women’s Engagement in Natural Resource Management in Northern Ghana. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kirkwood, E.K.; Dibley, M.J.; Khatun, W.; Ara, G.; Khanam, M.; Bokshi, A.; Li, M.; Alam, N.A. Can a Combined Agriculture and Nutrition Behaviour Change Intervention Improve Women’s Empowerment? A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study in Rural Bangladesh. Qual. Rep. 2022, 27, 2905–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alesina, A.; Giuliano, P.; Nunn, N. On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough. Q. J. Econ. 2013, 128, 469–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Calvet-Mir, L.; March, H.; Corbacho-Monné, D.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Reyes-García, V. Home Garden Ecosystem Services Valuation through a Gender Lens: A Case Study in the Catalan Pyrenees. Sustainability 2016, 8, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Howard, P.L. Gender and Social Dynamics in Swidden and Homegardens in Latin America. In Tropical Homegardens. Advances in Agroforestry; Kumar, B.M., Nair, P.K.R., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 3, pp. 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. EcoLogic Home Gardens for 200 Families, Oaxaca, Mexico. Available online: https://www.globalgiving.org/projects/home-gardens-protecting-forests-in-oaxaca-mexico/ (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  52. Patalagsa, M.A.; Schreinemachers, P.; Begum, S.; Begum, S. Sowing Seeds of Empowerment: Effect of Women’s Home Garden Training in Bangladesh. Agric. Food Secur. 2015, 4, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schreinemachers, P.; Patalagsa, M.A.; Uddin, N. Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Women’s Training in Home Gardening and Nutrition in Bangladesh. J. Dev. Eff. 2016, 8, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Syhre, J.-A.; Brückner, M. The Garden Has Improved My Life: Agency and Food Sovereignty of Women in Urban Agriculture in Nairobi. In Feminist Political Ecology and the Economics of Care; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mekonnen, A.; Mekuria, A.; Zemede, A. The Role of Homegardens for in Situ Conservation of Plant Biodiversity in Holeta Town, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 6, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Santos, M.; Moreira, H.; Cabral, J.A.; Gabriel, R.; Teixeira, A.; Bastos, R.; Aires, A. Contribution of Home Gardens to Sustainable Development: Perspectives from a Supported Opinion Essay. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fárez-Jiménez, M.-Á.; Cañizares-Medina, A.E.; Tapia-Segarra, J.I.; Robalino-Peña, E.M. Organización Comunitaria En La Producción de Huertos. Cienciamatria 2022, 8, 2168–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Duflo, E. Women Empowerment and Economic Development. J. Econ. Lit. 2012, 50, 1051–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lugo Espinosa, G.; Acevedo Ortiz, M.A.; Ortiz Hernández, Y.D. Conservación de semilla criolla y control biológico, resguardo del patrimonio biocultural de la Chinantla Oaxaca. In Nuevas Territorialidades-gestión de los Territorios y Recursos Naturales con Sustentabilidad Ambiental; Sarmiento-Franco, J.F., Ed.; UNAM-AMECIDER: Ciudad de México, México, 2023; Volume 1, pp. 221–236. ISBN 978-607-30-8314-0. [Google Scholar]
  60. Salazar, L. Semillas Para La Seguridad Alimentaria En América Latina y El Caribe (ALC); Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  61. Darby, K.; Hinton, T.; Torre, J. The Motivations and Needs of Rural, Low-Income Household Food Gardeners. J. Agric. Food Sys. Community Dev. 2020, 9, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Molina, C.L. La Familia Ante La Pandemia Del COVID-19. Ius Prax. 2020, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Haspolat, G. The Usage of Ultra Dilutions in Agriculture. Allg. Homöopath. Ztg. 2023, 268, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kumar, S.; Dhruw, S.; Porte, D.P.; Verma, N.K.; Kashyap, P.; Tiwari, R.K.S.; Bhattacharyya, A. Plant Extracts as an Alternative to Synthetic Chemicals: A Review. Biol. Forum–Int. J. 2023, 15, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  65. Prieto-Méndez, J.; Prieto-García, F.; Hernández-Pérez, A.D.; Quijada-Morales, L.M.; Aquino-Torres, E.; Acevedo-Sandoval, O.A. Agrohomeopathy: New Tool to Improve Soils, Crops and Plant Protection against Various Stress Conditions. Review. Hortic. Argent. 2021, 40, 43. [Google Scholar]
  66. Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N.; Brauman, K.A.; Cassidy, E.S.; Gerber, J.S.; Johnston, M.; Mueller, N.D.; O’Connell, C.; Ray, D.K.; West, P.C.; et al. Solutions for a Cultivated Planet. Nature 2011, 478, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, Q.; Al Mamun, A.; Naznen, F.; Masud, M.M. Adoption of Conservative Agricultural Practices among Rural Chinese Farmers. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Regner, T.; Crosetto, P. The Long-Term Effects of Self Pledging in Reward Crowdfunding. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 165, 120514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Borrero-Domínguez, C.; Cordón-Lagares, E.; Hernández-Garrido, R. Crowdfunding Para Organizaciones de Economía Social: Factores de Éxito. REVESCO. Rev. Estud. Coop. 2022, 140, 79940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ljumović, I.; Hanić, A.; Kovačević, V. The Role of Reward-Based Crowdfunding in Farm Financing: What Characterises Successful Campaign? Ekon. Poljopr. 2021, 68, 773–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Greenberg, M.D.; Hui, J.; Gerber, E. Crowdfunding: A Resource Exchange Perspective. In Proceedings of the CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April–2 May 2013; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 883–888. [Google Scholar]
  72. Behrendt, G.; Peter, S.; Sterly, S.; Häring, A.M. Community Financing for Sustainable Food and Farming: A Proximity Perspective. Agric. Hum. Values 2022, 39, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical location of Vega del Sol in la Chinantla, Oaxaca.
Figure 1. Geographical location of Vega del Sol in la Chinantla, Oaxaca.
Sustainability 16 09513 g001
Figure 2. Theoretical model for home garden adoption.
Figure 2. Theoretical model for home garden adoption.
Sustainability 16 09513 g002
Figure 3. Participation and involvement of family members in home gardens.
Figure 3. Participation and involvement of family members in home gardens.
Sustainability 16 09513 g003
Figure 4. Recognition from the community for implementing home gardens.
Figure 4. Recognition from the community for implementing home gardens.
Sustainability 16 09513 g004
Figure 5. Involvement of males and females in recovery of local seeds.
Figure 5. Involvement of males and females in recovery of local seeds.
Sustainability 16 09513 g005
Figure 6. Inclusion of biocompounds in home gardens.
Figure 6. Inclusion of biocompounds in home gardens.
Sustainability 16 09513 g006
Table 1. Initial perception of home gardens based on gender.
Table 1. Initial perception of home gardens based on gender.
Gender of the BeneficiaryInitial PerceptionCountsPercentage of Total (%)
Female (21)Very bad29.52
Bad628.57
Regular628.57
Good523.81
Very good29.52
Male (9)Very bad111.11
Bad111.11
Regular111.11
Good666.67
Very good00
Table 2. Contribution of home gardens to household food security and economic stability.
Table 2. Contribution of home gardens to household food security and economic stability.
MeasureLevelHH Count Over *Percentage of Total (%)
Availability of goodsBad310
Regular723.33
Good1342.33
Very good723.33
Access to Healthy foodBad310
Regular723.33
Good1446.67
Very good620
Savings due to productionVery bad413.33
Bad310
Regular930
Good1446.67
Harvest obtained during the cycleYes2376.67
No723.33
* Number of households exhibiting the specified characteristics. n = 30 households.
Table 3. Relation of income and expenditure per family for food needs.
Table 3. Relation of income and expenditure per family for food needs.
HHANIH *
(MXN $)
MFEH *
(MXN $)
MVEH *
(MXN $)
IIH *
(MXN $)
SFPI *
(MXN $)
ISSL *
(MXN $)
CIHI *
(MXN $)
111,23610,71615301400130347477
211,00810,6441479140079438517
310,91310,3561492140092313405
410,947980415821400182427609
510,800961213841400−16136120
610,410982816001400200274474
711,38910,09813311400−69256187
810,39710,78813061400−94265171
910,009975015551400155-155
1010,156981613931400−7153146
1111,06810,18815611400161266427
12998710,1221444140044458502
1310,45810,77613381400−62-−62
1411,449980415931400193-193
1511,19297801413140013378391
1611,00510,1041491140091399490
1711,468993613681400−32352320
1810,07398101419140019308327
1910,00910,5961439140039-39
2011,03410,51213201400−80426346
2110,76610,1881465140065381446
2210,76510,12215161400116243359
2311,47210,1401457140057-57
2410,508998415341400134428562
2510,867973213571400−43425382
2610,00410,6141475140075257332
2710,265976213391400−61-−61
2811,01610,4161412140012-12
2910,12910,3081436140036250286
3010,83710,24215071400107-107
* ANIH = Average Net Income per Household; MFEH = Monthly Food Expenses per Household; MVEH = Monthly Vegetable expenses per Household; IIH = Initial investment per Home Garden; SFPI = Savings from production after Investment; ISSL = Income from Surplus Sales in Local Market; and CIHI = Contribution or improvement to Household income. Household income calculations are based on a family size of six people. Amounts are in Mexican pesos (MXN).
Table 4. Identified crops at the community level for home gardens.
Table 4. Identified crops at the community level for home gardens.
CategoryCommon NameScientific NamePlant Number
Fruit treesCitrus fruits (sweet lemon and sweet orange)Citrus spp.+++
Citrus (sour orange)Citrus sp.++
MangoMangifera indica++
JinicuilInga jinicuil++
GuavaPsidium guajava++
PapayaCarica papaya+
SoursopAnnona muricata+
MameyPouteria sapota+
AnonaAnnona reticulata+
TamarindTamarindus indica+
Mexican avocadoPersea sp.++
PlumSpondia++
CarambolaAverrhoa carambola+
LycheeLitchi chinensis+
Pink PomaSyzygium jambos+
White cocoaTheobroma bicolor+
CocoaTheobroma cacao+
Purple plantainacuminata/balbisiana+
AnnattoBixa orellana+
CoffeeCoffea arabica
Coffea robusta
+
Posole leafCalathea lutea+
JicaraCrescentia cujete+
ChikalLagenaria siceraria+
Plants (edible or medicinal)Blackberry herbSolanum nigrescens++
FitolacaPhytolacca icosandra+
Smells at nightCestrum nocturnum+
Quintonil, white queliteAmaranthus hybridus++
Quelite de venadoIpomea sp.+
Chipil or ChepilCrotalaria sp.++
PurslanePortulaca oleracea+
ChayoteSechium edule+
PumpkinCucurbita moschata+
Passion fruit or PalauPassiflora edulis+
Watermelon Citrullus lanatus+
CoconutCocos nucifera+
TepejiloteChameadora tepijilote+
Huasmole, Huele moleRenealmia alpinia+
Nopal tres lobos or pitayaHylocereus undatus+
Tomato Solanum lycopersicon+
GuajeLuecaena esculenta+
Acuyo or hierba santaPiper auritum+
Mint or spearmintMentha viridis+
Oregano orejón or vaporub plantOcinum sp.++
Chile Capsicum annuum+
Chives Allium sp.+
EpazoteDysphania ambrosioides+
Basil Ocimum basilicum+
Cilantro de monte or bull’s corianderEryngium foetidum+
Cinnamon Cinnamomum verum+
CorianderCoriandrum sativum+
GrainsCornZea mays+++
BeansPhaseolus coccineus
Phaseolus vulgaris
+++
RootsMalangaColocasia esculenta++
Sweet potato Ipomea batata++
Cassava Manihot esculenta++
JicamaPachyrhizus erosus+
(+++) more than 20 plants per home garden, (++) between 6 and 19 plants per home garden, (+) one to 5 plants per home garden.
Table 5. Final perception of home gardens based on gender.
Table 5. Final perception of home gardens based on gender.
Gender of the BeneficiaryFinal PerceptionCountsPercentage of Total (%)
Female (21)Bad14.76
Regular838.10
Good1047.62
Very good29.52
Male (9)Bad00
Regular111.11
Good333.33
Very good555.56
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acevedo-Ortiz, M.A.; Lugo-Espinosa, G.; Ortiz-Hernández, Y.D.; Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Ortiz-Hernández, F.E.; Granados-Echegoyen, C.A. Women’s Leadership in Sustainable Agriculture: Preserving Traditional Knowledge Through Home Gardens in Santa Maria Jacatepec, Oaxaca. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219513

AMA Style

Acevedo-Ortiz MA, Lugo-Espinosa G, Ortiz-Hernández YD, Pérez-Pacheco R, Ortiz-Hernández FE, Granados-Echegoyen CA. Women’s Leadership in Sustainable Agriculture: Preserving Traditional Knowledge Through Home Gardens in Santa Maria Jacatepec, Oaxaca. Sustainability. 2024; 16(21):9513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219513

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acevedo-Ortiz, Marco Aurelio, Gema Lugo-Espinosa, Yolanda Donají Ortiz-Hernández, Rafael Pérez-Pacheco, Fernando Elí Ortiz-Hernández, and Carlos Alejandro Granados-Echegoyen. 2024. "Women’s Leadership in Sustainable Agriculture: Preserving Traditional Knowledge Through Home Gardens in Santa Maria Jacatepec, Oaxaca" Sustainability 16, no. 21: 9513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219513

APA Style

Acevedo-Ortiz, M. A., Lugo-Espinosa, G., Ortiz-Hernández, Y. D., Pérez-Pacheco, R., Ortiz-Hernández, F. E., & Granados-Echegoyen, C. A. (2024). Women’s Leadership in Sustainable Agriculture: Preserving Traditional Knowledge Through Home Gardens in Santa Maria Jacatepec, Oaxaca. Sustainability, 16(21), 9513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219513

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop