Can New Energy Become a Breakthrough for Economic Development—Based on Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Less Developed Coastal Cities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Status of Less Developed Coastal Cities
1.2. The Advantages of Developing New Energy in Less Developed Coastal Cities
2. Literature Review
3. Research Design
3.1. Definition of Less Developed Coastal Cities
3.2. Data
3.3. Method
3.3.1. Propensity Score Matching (PSM)
3.3.2. Difference-in-Differences Model (DID)
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1. Conclusions
4.2. Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Cui, J. Urbanization, economic agglomeration and economic growth. Heliyon 2023, 10, e23772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wannewitz, M.; Ajibade, I.; Mach, K.J.; Magnan, A.; Petzold, J.; Reckien, D.; Ulibarri, N.; Agopian, A.; Chalastani, V.I.; Hawxwell, T.; et al. Progress and gaps in climate change adaptation in coastal cities across the globe. Nat. Cities 2024, 1, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, D.; Li, J.; Zhao, Z.; Boamah, V.; Lansana, D. The Influence of Industrial Structure Transformation on Urban Resilience Based on 110 Prefecture-level Cities in the Yangtze River. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 96, 104621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, C.; Cai, F.; Qi, H.; Liu, J.; Lei, G.; Zhu, K.; Mao, Z. Coastal Erosion Vulnerability in Mainland China Based on Fuzzy Evaluation of Cloud Models. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 8, 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, J.; Gao, S. Wetland Utilization and Adaptation Practice of a Coastal Megacity: A Case Study of Chongming Island, Shanghai, China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Ding, P.; Xiong, Y.; Liu, W.; Hu, Z. Carbon emission reduction of shore power from power energy structure in China. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, K.; Fenhann, J. A Reformed CDM—Including New Mechanisms for Sustainable Development; Office of Scientific and Technical Information: Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández, L.; De La Sota, C.; Andrade, J.C.S.; Lumbreras, J.; Mazorra, J. Social development benefits of hydroelectricity CDM projects in Brazil. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2014, 21, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chirambo, D. Addressing the renewable energy financing gap in Africa to promote universal energy access: Integrated renewable energy financing in Malawi. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhringer, C.; Rutherford, T.F.; Springmann, M. Clean-Development Investments: An Incentive-Compatible CGE Modelling Framework. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2015, 60, 633651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Barker, T. The Clean Development Mechanism and low carbon development: A panel data analysis. Energy Econ. 2012, 34, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, J.; Liu, X.; Sun, Y.; Yu, H. Can CDM projects trigger host countries’ innovation in renewable energy? Evidence of firm-level dataset from China. Energy Policy 2020, 139, 111349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pueyo, A.; Mendiluce, M.; Naranjo, M.S.; Lumbreras, J. How to increase technology transfers to developing countries: A synthesis of the evidence. Clim. Policy 2012, 12, 320–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Rong, Z.; Ji, Q. Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 144, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watson, J.; Byrne, R.; Ockwell, D.; Stua, M. Lessons from China: Building technological capabilities for low carbon technology transfer and development. Clim. Chang. 2015, 131, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutter, C.; Parreño, J.C. Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Clim. Chang. 2007, 84, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaraitė, J.; Kurtyka, O.; Ollivier, H. Take a ride on the (not so) green side: How do CDM projects affect Indian manufacturing firms’ environmental performance? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2022, 114, 102684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, C. Co-benefits and additionality of the clean development mechanism: An empirical analysis. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2011, 62, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.J.; Sun, Y.F.; Huang, J. Energy efficiency, carbon emission performance, and technology gaps: Evidence from CDM project investment. Energy Policy 2018, 115, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crowe, T.L. The potential of the CDM to deliver pro-poor benefits. Clim. Policy 2013, 13, 58–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pécastaing, N.; Dávalos, J.; Inga, A. The effect of Peru’s CDM investments on households’ welfare: An econometric approach. Energy Policy 2018, 123, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirohi, S. CDM: Is it a “win-win” strategy for rural poverty alleviation in India? Clim. Chang. 2007, 84, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Zheng, W.; Zeng, W.; Lan, H. The economic effects of clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation project: Evidence from China. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strat. Manag. 2021, 13, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alex, Y.; Ren, C. Emission reduction targets and outcomes of the Clean Development Mechanism (2005–2020). PLoS Clim. 2022, 1, e0000046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almer, C.; Winkler, R. Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2017, 82, 125–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.K.; Choi, G.; Roh, T.; Lee, S.Y.; Um, D.B. Exploring the impact of environmental, social, and governance on clean development mechanism implementation through an institutional approach. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. High-dimensional CoVaR risk spillover network from oil market to global stock markets—Lessons from the Kyoto Protocol. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixon, T.; Leamon, G.; Zakkour, P.; Warren, L. CCS Projects as Kyoto Protocol CDM Activities. Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 7596–7604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, M.; Lin, B. Exploring the “not in my backyard” effect in the construction of waste incineration power plants—based on a survey in metropolises of China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 82, 106377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Takeuchi, K. Can climate mitigation help the poor? Measuring impacts of the CDM in rural China. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 95, 178–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.; Li, Y. Wind Power in China: Current State and Future Outlook. In Annual Report on China’s Response to Climate Change (2017); Wang, W., Liu, Y., Eds.; Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.D.N. Climate change adaptation in coastal cities of developing countries: Characterizing types of vulnerability and adaptation options. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 2020, 25, 739–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Q.; Gu, G.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z. Research on the economic effect of employment structure change in heterogeneous regions: Evidence from resource-based cities in China. Econ. Res. -Ekon. Istraživanja 2022, 35, 6364–6384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayer, P.; Urpelainen, J.; Wallace, J.L. Who uses the Clean Development Mechanism? An empirical analysis of projects in Chinese provinces. Glob. Environ. Change-Hum. Policy Dimens. 2013, 23, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Miao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, Y. The impact of economic development on urban livability: Evidence from 40 large and medium-sized cities of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2023, 33, 1767–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type of Emission Reduction | Annual Emission Reduction (Million Tons of CO2) | Emission Reduction Ratio | Number of Projects |
---|---|---|---|
new and renewable energy | 45,940 | 58.74% | 3733 |
energy saving and energy efficiency | 9716 | 12.42% | 623 |
methane recycling | 8212 | 10.50% | 476 |
fuel substitution | 2833 | 3.62% | 51 |
N2Odecomposition and elimination | 2818 | 3.60% | 43 |
HFC-23 decomposition | 6680 | 8.54% | 11 |
afforestation and reforestation | 16 | 0.02% | 5 |
waste-to-energy incineration | 823 | 1.05% | 54 |
others | 1167 | 1.49% | 78 |
total emission reduction | 78,205 | 100% | 5074 |
Variable | Obs. | Mean | SD. | Min | Median | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gdp | 5704 | 149.120 | 253.609 | 3.040 | 73.067 | 3267.987 |
gdp_per | 5599 | 3.523 | 4.333 | 0.076 | 2.243 | 53.662 |
labor | 5611 | 0.121 | 0.116 | 0.003 | 0.085 | 1.473 |
indus | 5606 | 51.067 | 15.349 | 0.840 | 52.295 | 94.820 |
popu | 5618 | 4.340 | 3.746 | 0.145 | 3.641 | 110.984 |
road | 5006 | 13.579 | 19.918 | 0.000 | 7.010 | 214.900 |
wage | 5588 | 3.186 | 2.214 | 0.001 | 2.657 | 32.063 |
fdi | 5053 | 731.226 | 1946.753 | 0.000 | 138.334 | 32,022.554 |
consume | 5320 | 66.909 | 120.598 | 0.002 | 26.932 | 1341.390 |
fix | 4997 | 78.937 | 121.556 | 0.740 | 37.567 | 1708.576 |
emission | 5729 | 1.171 | 1.957 | 0.000 | 0.442 | 15.917 |
num | 5729 | 9.519 | 13.111 | 0.000 | 5.000 | 88.000 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln_gdp | ln_gdp | ln_gdp | ln_gdp | lngdp_per | lngdp_per | lngdp_per | lngdp_per | |
post × emission | 0.008 *** | 0.008 *** | 0.006 ** | 0.008 *** | ||||
(5.61) | (5.67) | (2.25) | (5.67) | |||||
post × num | 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.001 *** | ||||
(4.85) | (5.31) | (2.63) | (5.31) | |||||
t | −0.021 | −0.022 | −0.089 ** | −0.091 ** | −0.073 | −0.075 | −0.089 ** | −0.091 ** |
(−1.11) | (−1.14) | (−2.39) | (−2.45) | (−0.99) | (−1.01) | (−2.39) | (−2.45) | |
ln_popu | 0.026 *** | 0.027 *** | −0.974 *** | −0.973 *** | ||||
(3.57) | (3.60) | (−131.50) | (−131.41) | |||||
ln_road | 0.044 *** | 0.044 *** | 0.044 *** | 0.044 *** | ||||
(11.33) | (11.33) | (11.33) | (11.33) | |||||
ln_wage | 0.018 *** | 0.018 *** | 0.018 *** | 0.018 *** | ||||
(2.92) | (2.95) | (2.92) | (2.95) | |||||
ln_fdi | −0.003 ** | −0.003 ** | −0.003 ** | −0.003 ** | ||||
(−2.36) | (−2.32) | (−2.36) | (−2.32) | |||||
ln_consume | 0.035 *** | 0.036 *** | 0.035 *** | 0.036 *** | ||||
(6.74) | (6.84) | (6.74) | (6.84) | |||||
ln_fix | 0.077 *** | 0.076 *** | 0.077 *** | 0.076 *** | ||||
(18.42) | (18.35) | (18.42) | (18.35) | |||||
_cons | 3.673 *** | 3.686 *** | 4.819 *** | 4.858 *** | 1.277 | 1.320 | 2.516 *** | 2.555 *** |
(9.65) | (9.67) | (6.49) | (6.54) | (0.86) | (0.89) | (3.39) | (3.44) | |
cities’_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
year_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 5704 | 5704 | 4446 | 4446 | 5599 | 5599 | 4446 | 4446 |
r2 | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.986 | 0.986 | 0.932 | 0.932 | 0.984 | 0.984 |
r2_a | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.98 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln_labor | ln_labor | ln_labor | ln_labor | ln_indus | ln_indus | ln_indus | ln_indus | |
post × emission | −0.001 | −0.000 | 0.017 *** | 0.017 *** | ||||
(−0.16) | (−0.04) | (5.35) | (4.34) | |||||
post × num | −0.002 ** | −0.001 * | 0.003 *** | 0.003 *** | ||||
(−2.42) | (−1.90) | (6.98) | (5.71) | |||||
t | 0.169 | 0.173 | 0.160 | 0.162 | −0.066 | −0.073 | −0.067 | −0.073 |
(1.34) | (1.37) | (1.42) | (1.44) | (−0.73) | (−0.81) | (−0.66) | (−0.72) | |
ln_popu | −0.894 *** | −0.894 *** | 0.012 | 0.012 | ||||
(−39.74) | (−39.76) | (0.58) | (0.60) | |||||
ln_road | 0.089 *** | 0.090 *** | −0.055 *** | −0.056 *** | ||||
(7.61) | (7.70) | (−5.21) | (−5.29) | |||||
ln_wage | −0.116 *** | −0.115 *** | 0.116 *** | 0.116 *** | ||||
(−6.07) | (−6.06) | (6.81) | (6.83) | |||||
ln_fdi | −0.012 *** | −0.012 *** | 0.007 ** | 0.007 ** | ||||
(−3.46) | (−3.39) | (2.33) | (2.31) | |||||
ln_consume | 0.029 * | 0.027 * | −0.047 *** | −0.045 *** | ||||
(1.81) | (1.70) | (−3.32) | (−3.14) | |||||
ln_fix | −0.058 *** | −0.060 *** | 0.014 | 0.015 | ||||
(−4.61) | (−4.74) | (1.24) | (1.30) | |||||
_cons | −5.601 ** | −5.673 ** | −4.408 * | −4.447 ** | 5.195 *** | 5.335 *** | 5.359 *** | 5.470 *** |
(−2.22) | (−2.25) | (−1.96) | (−1.97) | (2.87) | (2.96) | (2.65) | (2.71) | |
city_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
year_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 5611 | 5611 | 4445 | 4445 | 5606 | 5606 | 4442 | 4442 |
r2 | 0.190 | 0.190 | 0.444 | 0.444 | 0.682 | 0.683 | 0.712 | 0.713 |
r2_a | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln_gdp | ln_gdp | lngdp_per | lngdp_per | ln_labor | ln_labor | ln_indus | ln_indus | |
post × emission × coastal | 0.014 ** | 0.014 ** | 0.094 *** | −0.056 *** | ||||
(2.12) | (2.12) | (4.67) | (−3.11) | |||||
post × num × costal | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.006 ** | −0.003 | ||||
(1.14) | (1.14) | (2.24) | (−1.48) | |||||
t | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | 0.166 | 0.163 | −0.070 | −0.068 |
(−2.37) | (−2.37) | (−2.37) | (−2.37) | (1.47) | (1.45) | (−0.69) | (−0.67) | |
ln_popu | 0.027 *** | 0.027 *** | −0.973 *** | −0.973 *** | −0.894 *** | −0.894 *** | 0.012 | 0.012 |
(3.59) | (3.59) | (−131.03) | (−130.98) | (−39.84) | (−39.77) | (0.60) | (0.60) | |
ln_road | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.089 *** | 0.090 *** | −0.053 *** | −0.053 *** |
(11.55) | (11.55) | (11.55) | (11.55) | (7.64) | (7.64) | (−5.03) | (−5.04) | |
ln_wage | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | −0.114 *** | −0.115 *** | 0.116 *** | 0.117 *** |
(3.02) | (2.99) | (3.02) | (2.99) | (−5.98) | (−6.05) | (6.78) | (6.83) | |
ln_fdi | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.012 *** | −0.012 *** | 0.008 ** | 0.008 ** |
(−2.08) | (−2.09) | (−2.08) | (−2.09) | (−3.37) | (−3.41) | (2.44) | (2.47) | |
ln_consume | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.027 * | 0.028 * | −0.048 *** | −0.049 *** |
(6.49) | (6.50) | (6.49) | (6.50) | (1.72) | (1.76) | (−3.39) | (−3.42) | |
ln_fix | 0.075 *** | 0.075 *** | 0.075 *** | 0.075 *** | −0.055 *** | −0.057 *** | 0.009 | 0.010 |
(18.08) | (18.02) | (18.08) | (18.02) | (−4.37) | (−4.53) | (0.76) | (0.87) | |
_cons | 4.806 *** | 4.814 *** | 2.504 *** | 2.512 *** | −4.518 ** | −4.459 ** | 5.432 *** | 5.396 *** |
(6.46) | (6.46) | (3.36) | (3.37) | (−2.01) | (−1.98) | (2.69) | (2.67) | |
city_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
year_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 4446 | 4446 | 4446 | 4446 | 4445 | 4445 | 4442 | 4442 |
r2 | 0.985 | 0.985 | 0.984 | 0.984 | 0.447 | 0.444 | 0.711 | 0.710 |
r2_a | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln_gdp | ln_gdp | lngdp_per | lngdp_per | ln_labor | ln_labor | ln_indus | ln_indus | |
post × emission × gdp | 0.00002 ** | 0.00002 ** | 0.00010 *** | −0.00004 | ||||
(2.04) | (2.04) | (4.22) | (−1.64) | |||||
post × num × gdp | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.00001 ** | −0.0000 | ||||
(1.18) | (1.18) | (2.27) | (−0.02) | |||||
t | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | −0.088 ** | 0.164 | 0.162 | −0.068 | −0.067 |
(−2.37) | (−2.38) | (−2.37) | (−2.38) | (1.46) | (1.44) | (−0.67) | (−0.66) | |
ln_popu | 0.026 *** | 0.027 *** | −0.974 *** | −0.973 *** | −0.895 *** | −0.894 *** | 0.013 | 0.012 |
(3.55) | (3.58) | (−131.04) | (−130.99) | (−39.89) | (−39.78) | (0.63) | (0.60) | |
ln_road | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.091 *** | 0.090 *** | −0.053 *** | −0.053 *** |
(11.59) | (11.58) | (11.59) | (11.58) | (7.74) | (7.71) | (−5.06) | (−5.02) | |
ln_wage | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | 0.019 *** | −0.113 *** | −0.115 *** | 0.116 *** | 0.117 *** |
(3.04) | (3.00) | (3.04) | (3.00) | (−5.94) | (−6.02) | (6.79) | (6.84) | |
ln_fdi | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.002 ** | −0.012 *** | −0.012 *** | 0.008 ** | 0.008 ** |
(−2.13) | (−2.13) | (−2.13) | (−2.13) | (−3.48) | (−3.47) | (2.51) | (2.50) | |
ln_consume | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.029 * | 0.029 * | −0.049 *** | −0.049 *** |
(6.54) | (6.54) | (6.54) | (6.54) | (1.84) | (1.82) | (−3.46) | (−3.45) | |
ln_fix | 0.076 *** | 0.075 *** | 0.076 *** | 0.075 *** | −0.053 *** | −0.056 *** | 0.009 | 0.010 |
0.026 *** | 0.027 *** | −0.974 *** | −0.973 *** | −0.895 *** | −0.894 *** | 0.013 | 0.012 | |
_cons | 4.808 *** | 4.815 *** | 2.506 *** | 2.513 *** | −4.499 ** | −4.451 ** | 5.398 *** | 5.367 *** |
(6.46) | (6.47) | (3.37) | (3.37) | (−2.00) | (−1.98) | (2.67) | (2.65) | |
city_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
year_fixed_effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 4446 | 4446 | 4446 | 4446 | 4445 | 4445 | 4442 | 4442 |
r2 | 0.985 | 0.985 | 0.984 | 0.984 | 0.446 | 0.444 | 0.710 | 0.710 |
r2_a | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Shi, Y.; Wu, X. Can New Energy Become a Breakthrough for Economic Development—Based on Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Less Developed Coastal Cities. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208895
Wang Y, Wang R, Shi Y, Wu X. Can New Energy Become a Breakthrough for Economic Development—Based on Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Less Developed Coastal Cities. Sustainability. 2024; 16(20):8895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208895
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Yao, Ruichen Wang, Yupeng Shi, and Xuenan Wu. 2024. "Can New Energy Become a Breakthrough for Economic Development—Based on Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Less Developed Coastal Cities" Sustainability 16, no. 20: 8895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208895
APA StyleWang, Y., Wang, R., Shi, Y., & Wu, X. (2024). Can New Energy Become a Breakthrough for Economic Development—Based on Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Less Developed Coastal Cities. Sustainability, 16(20), 8895. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208895