A Measurement of Perceptions of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve in Khartoum, Sudan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Visitor Survey and Sampling
- How does visitors’ knowledge of the forest ecosystem correlate with their perceptions and attitudes toward the forest ecosystem?
- Does the frequency of direct experiences in forests correlate with visitors’ attitudes toward forest ecosystems?
- Does the frequency of direct experiences and education in forests correlate with visitors’ knowledge of forest ecosystems?
- Do visitors’ gender and grade of education affect their perceptions and knowledge of the ecosystem and attitudes toward the forest ecosystem?
2.3. Questionnaire Design, Sampling, and Data Collection
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. The Demographic and Economic Attributes of Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve
3.2. Visitor Behaviors and Their Perceptions of the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve
3.2.1. Visitors’ Behaviors and Their Evaluations
3.2.2. Preferences Regarding Forest Ecosystem Service Functions among Visitors
3.2.3. An Analysis of How Varying Socioeconomic Backgrounds Affected the Perceptions of Forests and Ecosystem Services
3.2.4. Recreation Plans for Forest Ecosystem Service Functions among Visitors
3.2.5. Interest in the Issues of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors
3.2.6. Correlation Analysis of Demographic Characteristics and Their Associations with Visitors’ Activities and Perceptions
3.3. Questionnaire Items Showing the Frequencies of Visitors’ Perceptions about AL-Sunut Forest
Responses to a Cluster of Questions about Visitor Knowledge
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Recommendations
6. Limitations and Future Perspectives
6.1. Limitations
6.2. Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Part I: Personal Background: | Please Mark | ||||
1. Gender: | Female | ( ) | Male | ( ) | |
2. Age Group: | 24 or less | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45 or above | |
( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ||
3. Education status: | Primary school or less | Secondary school | University | Postgraduate | Other |
( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | |
4. Marital status: | Single | Married | Divorced | Widowed | |
( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ||
5. Occupation: | Student | Governmental | Private | Others | None |
( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | ( ) | |
6. Residential area: | Khartoum state | Other state | Other Nationality | ||
( ) | ( ) | ( ) |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
important | Not important | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
Yes | No | don’t Know |
1 | 2 | 3 |
References
- Bruzzese, S.; Blanc, S.; Merlino, V.M.; Massaglia, S.; Brun, F. Civil society’s perception of forest ecosystem services. A case study in the Western Alps. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1000043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, J.-C.; Chiou, C.-R.; Chan, W.-H.; Wu, M.-S. Public perception of forest ecosystem services in Taiwan. J. For. Res. 2021, 26, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, C.; Kairo, J.G.; Bosire, J.O.; Mohamed, M.O.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Koedam, N. Involvement, knowledge and perception in a natural reserve under participatory management: Mida Creek, Kenya. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2017, 142, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouko, C.A.; Mulwa, R.; Kibugi, R.; Owuor, M.A.; Zaehringer, J.G.; Oguge, N.O. Community Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and the Management of Mt. Marsabit Forest in Northern Kenya. Environments 2018, 5, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, E.; Tengö, M.; McPhearson, T.; Kremer, P. Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosyst. Ecol. A New Synth. 2010, 1, 110–139. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.-H.; Chang, C. Impact of Changes in Forest Use Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Perception of Forest Ecosystem Services in the Republic of Korea. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghani Pour, M.; Barati, A.A.; Azadi, H.; Scheffran, J.; Shirkhani, M. Analyzing forest residents’ perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation. For. Policy Econ. 2023, 146, 102866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potschin, M.; Haines-Young, R. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. In Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; pp. 25–44. [Google Scholar]
- Haines-Young, R.; Potschin, M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES, Version 4.1); European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012; Volume 33, p. 107. [Google Scholar]
- Von Döhren, P.; Haase, D. Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 52, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholson, E.; Watermeyer, K.E.; Rowland, J.A.; Sato, C.F.; Stevenson, S.L.; Andrade, A.; Brooks, T.M.; Burgess, N.D.; Cheng, S.-T.; Grantham, H.S.; et al. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 5, 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, G.; Piao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Peng, J.; Niu, S. Moving toward a new era of ecosystem science. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derks, J.; Winkel, G.; Strieck, J.; De Vreese, R. Visitor frequencies and attitudes towards urban forests and their management, before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. A mixed methods case study in Bonn, Germany. Ecosyst. People 2023, 19, 2195021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deniz, D. Sustainable thinking and environmental awareness through design education. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 34, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koprowicz, A.; Korzeniewicz, R.; Pusz, W.; Baranowska, M. Sociodemographic Determinants of Poles’ Attitudes towards the Forest during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swanwick, C. Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, S62–S75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, J.; Moser, S.C. Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2011, 2, 547–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moutouama, F.T.; Biaou, S.S.H.; Kyereh, B.; Asante, W.A.; Natta, A.K. Factors shaping local people’s perception of ecosystem services in the Atacora Chain of Mountains, a biodiversity hotspot in northern Benin. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2019, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garms, M.; Leiz, M.; Mayer, M. Perception of climate change-related forest dieback in mountain forests among the local population. Eur. J. For. Res. 2024, 143, 509–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juvan, E.; Omerzel, D.G.; Maravić, M.U. Tourist behaviour: An overview of models to date. In Proceedings of the Management International Conference, Vienna, Austria, 14–18 May 2017; pp. 24–27. [Google Scholar]
- Sodhi, N.S.; Lee, T.M.; Sekercioglu, C.H.; Webb, E.L.; Prawiradilaga, D.M.; Lohman, D.J.; Pierce, N.E.; Diesmos, A.C.; Rao, M.; Ehrlich, P.R.; et al. Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 1175–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anton, C.; Young, J.; Harrison, P.A.; Musche, M.; Bela, G.; Feld, C.K.; Harrington, R.; Haslett, J.R.; Pataki, G.; Rounsevell, M.D.; et al. Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2979–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janeczko, E.; Banaś, J.; Woźnicka, M.; Zięba, S.; Banaś, K.U.; Janeczko, K.; Fialova, J. Sociocultural Profile as a Predictor of Perceived Importance of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Case Study from Poland. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konijnendijk, C.C.; Ricard, R.M.; Kenney, A.; Randrup, T.B. Defining urban forestry—A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For. Urban Green. 2006, 4, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šodková, M.; Purwestri, R.C.; Riedl, M.; Jarský, V.; Hájek, M. Drivers and frequency of forest visits: Results of a national survey in the Czech Republic. Forests 2020, 11, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorwart, C.E.; Moore, R.L.; Leung, Y.-F. Visitors’ perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: A model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leis. Sci. 2009, 32, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.-T.; Hsieh, Y.-T.; Huang, S.-C.; Wei, C.-H.; Chen, C.-T.; Chen, J.-C. Perceptions of tourists of the resources, ecological service functions and recreation value of the Guanwu National Forest Recreation Area. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macura, B.; Zorondo-Rodríguez, F.; Grau-Satorras, M.; Demps, K.; Laval, M.; Garcia, C.A.; Reyes-García, V. Local community attitudes toward forests outside protected areas in India. Impact of legal awareness, trust, and participation. Ecol. Soc. 2011, 16, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, W.H.; Elagib, N.A.; Gaese, H.; Heinrich, J. Rainfall conditions and rainwater harvesting potential in the urban area of Khartoum. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 91, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, M.M.; Sevinc, H. Adaptation of climate-responsive building design strategies and resilience to climate change in the hot/arid region of Khartoum, Sudan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 47, 101429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, M.I.; Elagib, N.A.; Horn, F.; Saad, S.A. Lessons learned from Khartoum flash flood impacts: An integrated assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601, 1031–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, N.A.; Madsen, H.; Ahmed, A.A.A. Types of trematodes infecting freshwater snails found in irrigation canals in the East Nile locality, Khartoum, Sudan. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2016, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltayeb, H.; Idris, E.; Adam, A.; Ezaldeen, T.; Hamed, D. A forest in a city Biodiversity at Sunut forest, Khartoum, Sudan. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. B Zool. 2012, 4, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salah, O.; Idris, E. A note on the bird diversity at two sites in Khartoum, Sudan. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. B Zool. 2013, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, G.; Reed, P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 2000, 46, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherrouse, B.C.; Clement, J.M.; Semmens, D.J. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31, 748–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.-Y.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Chen, H.-S.; Hsieh, C.-M. Assessing the Amenity Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: Perspectives from the Use of Sustainable Green Spaces. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logan, S. Exchange rate reform in Sudan. In Policy Brief-SDN-20260; Internatioal Growth Center: London, UK, 2020; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Young, D.E.; de Koff, J.; Britwum, K. Extension Agents’ Perceptions, Practices, and Needs of Urban Forestry: A Case Study from Tennessee, United States. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caparrós, A.; Oviedo, J.L.; Álvarez, A.; Campos, P. Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: Theory and application to free access recreation. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 139, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.-T.; Chen, Y.-S. Local intentions to participate in ecotourism development in Taiwan’s Atayal communities. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2018, 16, 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.-T.; Chiu, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-S. An evaluation of recreational benefits and tribal tourism development for aboriginal villages after post-disaster reconstruction-a case study of Taiwan. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2019, 24, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, P.-H.; Nepal, S.K. Local perspectives of ecotourism development in Tawushan Nature Reserve, Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 1117–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega-Gil, M.; Mata García, A.; ElHichou-Ahmed, C. The Effect of Ageing, Gender and Environmental Problems in Subjective Well-Being. Land 2021, 10, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Peng, C. Do the Age and Gender of Chairperson Affect Firms’ Environmental Protection Investment? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sikorska, D.; Sikorski, P.; Archiciński, P.; Chormański, J.; Hopkins, R.J. You Can’t See the Woods for the Trees: Invasive Acer negundo L. in Urban Riparian Forests Harms Biodiversity and Limits Recreation Activity. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnberger, A.; Schneider, I.E.; Ebenberger, M.; Eder, R.; Venette, R.C.; Snyder, S.A.; Gobster, P.H.; Choi, A.; Cottrell, S. Emerald ash borer impacts on visual preferences for urban forest recreation settings. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 27, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnberger, A. Recreation use of urban forests: An inter-area comparison. Urban For. Urban Green. 2006, 4, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Borges, M.C.; Chon, J. Impacts of environmental values on tourism motivation: The case of FICA, Brazil. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaligot, R.; Hasler, S.; Chenal, J. National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland. Ambio 2019, 48, 1219–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riechers, M.; Barkmann, J.; Tscharntke, T. Diverging perceptions by social groups on cultural ecosystem services provided by urban green. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 175, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plieninger, T.; Dijks, S.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Bieling, C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, C.M.; Pritchard, R.; McNicol, I.; Owen, M.; Fisher, J.A.; Lehmann, C. Ecosystem services from southern African woodlands and their future under global change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-López, B.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; García-Llorente, M.; Palomo, I.; Casado-Arzuaga, I.; Amo, D.G.D.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Palacios-Agundez, I.; Willaarts, B. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poppenborg, P.; Koellner, T. Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practices? An analysis of farmers’ decision-making in a South Korean watershed. Land Use Policy 2013, 31, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouwakinnou, G.N.; Biaou, S.; Vodouhe, F.G.; Tovihessi, M.S.; Awessou, B.K.; Biaou, H.S. Local perceptions and factors determining ecosystem services identification around two forest reserves in Northern Benin. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2019, 15, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hochmalová, M.; Purwestri, R.C.; Yongfeng, J.; Jarský, V.; Riedl, M.; Yuanyong, D.; Hájek, M. Demand for forest ecosystem services: A comparison study in selected areas in the Czech Republic and China. Eur. J. For. Res. 2022, 141, 867–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Handoyo, B.; Astina, I.; Mkumbachi, R. Students’ environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviour: Preliminary study of geography students at state university of malang. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Semarang, Indonesia, 21–22 September 2021; p. 012049. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Saechang, O. Is female a more pro-environmental gender? Evidence from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dalen, H.M.; Halvorsen, B. Gender Differences in Environmental Related Behaviour. 2011. Available online: http://www.ssb.no/publikasjoner/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Kuvan, Y.; Akan, P. Residents’ attitudes toward general and forest-related impacts of tourism: The case of Belek, Antalya. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Kato, E.; Bhandary, P.; Nkonya, E.; Ibrahim, H.; Agbonlahor, M.U.; Hussain, I. Communitieties’ Perceptions and Knowledge of Ecosystem Services: Evidence from Rural Communities in Nigeria. 2015. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567753 (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Li, J.; Ali, F.; Kim, W.G. Age matters: How demographics influence visitor perception and attitude at the destination level. Int. J. Innov. Learn. 2017, 21, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Brindley, P.; Lange, E. The Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Preference and Park Usage in Guangzhou, China. Land 2022, 11, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Background Attributes | Sub-Item | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 52.6 |
Female | 47.4 | |
Age group | 24 or less | 66.4 |
25–34 | 27.9 | |
35–44 | 3.4 | |
45 or above | 2.3 | |
Educational level | Primary or less | 2.7 |
Secondary school | 23.6 | |
University | 63.9 | |
Postgraduate | 7.5 | |
Other | 2.3 | |
Marital status | Single | 73.2 |
Married | 23.4 | |
Divorced | 2.5 | |
Widow | 0.9 | |
Occupation | Student | 67.6 |
Governmental | 9.5 | |
Private | 11.3 | |
Other | 5 | |
None/Unemployed | 6.6 | |
Monthly income (SDG) | <5000 SDG | 53.5 |
5000–9000 SDG | 31.1 | |
10,000–14,000 SDG | 5.4 | |
15,000–19,000 SDG | 6.1 | |
20,000–24,000 SDG | 1.6 | |
>25,000 SDG | 2 | |
Residence area | Khartoum State | 78.2 |
Other state | 19.7 | |
Other nationality | 2 |
Socioeconomic Factor | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Between Groups | 0.911 | 5 | 0.182 | 0.727 | 0.604 |
Within Groups | 109.039 | 435 | 0.251 | |||
Total | 109.950 | 440 | ||||
Age Group | Between Groups | 0.851 | 5 | 0.170 | 0.377 | 0.864 |
Within Groups | 196.210 | 435 | 0.451 | |||
Total | 197.061 | 440 | ||||
Education Status | Between Groups | 0.602 | 5 | 0.120 | 0.247 | 0.941 |
Within Groups | 211.643 | 435 | 0.487 | |||
Total | 212.245 | 440 | ||||
Occupation | Between Groups | 19.819 | 5 | 3.964 | 2.668 | 0.022 |
Within Groups | 646.141 | 435 | 1.485 | |||
Total | 665.959 | 440 | ||||
Monthly Income | Between Groups | 0.023 | 5 | 0.005 | 2.087 | 0.066 |
Within Groups | 0.974 | 435 | 0.002 | |||
Total | 0.998 | 440 | ||||
Residential Area | Between Groups | 0.986 | 5 | 0.197 | 0.884 | 0.492 |
Within Groups | 97.014 | 435 | 0.223 | |||
Total | 98.000 | 440 |
Model | R | R-Squared | Adjusted R-Squared | Std. Error of the Estimate | Change Statistics | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-Squared Change | F Change | df1 | df2 | Sig. F Change | |||||
1 a b | 0.227 a | 0.051 | 0.027 | 0.39799 | 0.051 | 2.111 | 11 | 429 | 0.019 b |
Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Regression | 3.679 | 11 | 0.334 | 2.111 | 0.019 b |
Residual | 67.954 | 429 | 0.158 | |||
Total | 71.633 | 440 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
1 | (Constant) | 1.742 | 0.445 | 3.912 | 0.000 | |
Gender | 0.065 | 0.039 | 0.081 | 1.698 | 0.090 | |
Age group | −0.011 | 0.030 | −0.018 | −0.357 | 0.721 | |
Education status | −0.024 | 0.028 | −0.042 | −0.885 | 0.377 | |
Occupation | 0.025 | 0.016 | 0.077 | 1.529 | 0.127 | |
Mode of transportation | 0.002 | 0.040 | 0.003 | 0.060 | 0.952 | |
Travel time to the visited site | −0.042 | 0.011 | −0.175 | −3.642 | 0.000 | |
Most of the time alone or in a group | −0.136 | 0.076 | −0.090 | −1.785 | 0.075 | |
Travel partners | 0.001 | 0.018 | 0.003 | 0.069 | 0.945 | |
Season preferred for recreational purposes | −0.022 | 0.021 | −0.051 | −1.067 | 0.286 | |
Days frequently visited | −0.009 | 0.033 | −0.014 | −0.282 | 0.778 | |
Monthly income | −0.133 | 0.403 | −0.016 | −0.330 | 0.742 |
Variables | Value | Asymptotic Standard Error a | Approximate T b | Approximate Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Pearson’s R | 0.049 | 0.048 | 1.025 | 0.306 c |
Spearman Correlation | 0.041 | 0.048 | 0.852 | 0.395 c | |
Age Group | Pearson’s R | −0.003 | 0.044 | −0.069 | 0.945 c |
Spearman Correlation | −0.022 | 0.047 | −0.468 | 0.640 c | |
Marital Status | Pearson’s R | −0.067 | 0.044 | −1.404 | 0.161 c |
Spearman Correlation | −0.058 | 0.046 | −1.227 | 0.220 c | |
Education Status | Pearson’s R | −0.034 | 0.045 | −0.716 | 0.474 c |
Spearman Correlation | −0.015 | 0.048 | −0.310 | 0.757 c | |
Occupation | Pearson’s R | −0.052 | 0.054 | −1.088 | 0.277 c |
Spearman Correlation | −0.087 | 0.049 | −1.824 | 0.069 c | |
Residential Area | Pearson’s R | 0.053 | 0.052 | 1.103 | 0.271 c |
Spearman Correlation | 0.041 | 0.048 | 0.860 | 0.390 c | |
Monthly Income | Pearson’s R | −0.004 | 0.048 | −0.080 | 0.937 c |
Spearman Correlation | 0.005 | 0.048 | 0.110 | 0.913 c | |
No. of Valid Cases | 441 |
Variable | Answer | Frequency | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
I have a good knowledge of forest ecosystem issues | Yes | 249 | 56.5 |
No | 121 | 27.4 | |
Do not know | 71 | 16.1 | |
When humans intervene in changing ecosystems, they often produce severe environmental consequences | Yes | 340 | 77.1 |
No | 46 | 10.4 | |
Do not know | 55 | 12.5 | |
Forests are essential for biodiversity | Yes | 404 | 91.6 |
No | 17 | 3.9 | |
Do not know | 20 | 4.5 | |
Forests are essential in tourism and biodiversity | Yes | 422 | 95.7 |
No | 11 | 2.5 | |
Do not know | 8 | 1.8 | |
The forest provides several services if well managed | Yes | 401 | 90.9 |
No | 24 | 5.4 | |
Do not know | 16 | 3.6 | |
The laws and regulations enforced in the state are sufficient to protect the AL-Sunut Forest/environment | Yes | 195 | 44.2 |
No | 218 | 49.4 | |
Do not know | 28 | 6.3 | |
Educational programs in schools have a broad scope to cover knowledge of environmental issues among students | Yes | 246 | 55.8 |
No | 163 | 37.0 | |
Do not know | 32 | 7.3 | |
I am interested in the issues of the ecosystem that are shown through different media | Yes | 288 | 65.3 |
No | 104 | 23.6 | |
Do not know | 49 | 11.1 | |
I am very concerned with the environmental issues surrounding the forest | Yes | 288 | 65.3 |
No | 111 | 25.2 | |
Do not know | 42 | 9.5 | |
By working positively with others, we can solve many environmental issues | Yes | 387 | 87.8 |
No | 23 | 5.2 | |
Do not know | 31 | 7.0 | |
Environmental education is no less important than any other curriculum | Yes | 348 | 78.9 |
No | 63 | 14.3 | |
Do not know | 30 | 6.8 | |
Efforts must be made to protect habitats and natural resources such as the forest | Yes | 398 | 90.2 |
No | 22 | 5.0 | |
Do not know | 21 | 4.8 | |
Increasing the number of populations reflects negatively on the ecosystem services | Yes | 312 | 70.7 |
No | 94 | 21.3 | |
Do not know | 35 | 7.9 | |
Encroachment on the forest negatively affects the ecosystem services system | Yes | 355 | 80.5 |
No | 50 | 11.3 | |
Do not know | 36 | 8.2 | |
Do you support removing the forest for urban development purposes? | Yes | 123 | 27.9 |
No | 297 | 67.3 | |
Do not know | 21 | 4.8 | |
The present behavior of individuals contributes to the conservation and protection of the environment | Yes | 225 | 51.0 |
No | 190 | 43.1 | |
Do not know | 26 | 5.9 | |
In the event of any negative behavior detrimental to the forest, I have to inform the competent authorities | Yes | 409 | 92.7 |
No | 17 | 3.9 | |
Do not know | 15 | 3.4 | |
Social media are among the most successful means of spreading environmental awareness | Yes | 383 | 86.8 |
No | 33 | 7.5 | |
Do not know | 25 | 5.7 | |
Environmental events and activities have a significant impact on raising environmental awareness | Yes | 367 | 83.2 |
No | 42 | 9.5 | |
Do not know | 32 | 7.3 | |
Community participation in various forms of environmental issues, such as global warming and pollution, helps to raise environmental awareness | Yes | 326 | 73.9 |
No | 56 | 12.7 | |
Do not know | 59 | 13.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yusif, S.; Cao, Y.; Eissa, A.; Elzaki, E.; Khalil, A. A Measurement of Perceptions of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve in Khartoum, Sudan. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104247
Yusif S, Cao Y, Eissa A, Elzaki E, Khalil A. A Measurement of Perceptions of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve in Khartoum, Sudan. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104247
Chicago/Turabian StyleYusif, Suliman, Yukun Cao, Abdelazim Eissa, Elsamoal Elzaki, and Ammar Khalil. 2024. "A Measurement of Perceptions of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve in Khartoum, Sudan" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104247
APA StyleYusif, S., Cao, Y., Eissa, A., Elzaki, E., & Khalil, A. (2024). A Measurement of Perceptions of the Forest Ecosystem among Visitors to the AL-Sunut Forest Reserve in Khartoum, Sudan. Sustainability, 16(10), 4247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104247