Impacts of Crop-Specific Agricultural Practices on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil in Kvemo Kartli Region (Georgia): A Preliminary Assessment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Soil Sampling
2.3. Farm Survey
2.4. Soil Analysis
2.5. Statistical Analysis
2.6. Baseline Content
2.7. Soil Contamination Assessment
2.7.1. Contamination Factor (CF) and Pollution Load Index (PLI)
2.7.2. Nemerow’s Comprehensive Pollution Index Method
2.7.3. Enrichment Factor (EF)
2.7.4. Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo)
2.7.5. Maximum Permissible Total Addition
3. Results
3.1. Land Use Types
3.2. Organic Matter
3.3. Phosphorous
3.4. Potassium
3.5. Copper
3.6. Zinc
3.7. Iron
3.8. Manganese
3.9. Nickel
3.10. Cadmium
3.11. Lead
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The impact of crop-specific management practices on plant nutrient concentrations in the soil is substantial. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed statistically significant differences in the contents of all studied macro-nutrients (P, K), micro-nutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn), and toxic elements (Cd, Pb) between land use forms. The differences are also evident in organic matter content, an essential prerequisite for soil fertility. The agricultural practices established in the vineyards have the most significant impact on soil nutrient status and toxic element content, followed by intensive and extensive arable lands and orchards. In contrast, soils in pastures, as expected, are relatively less affected, as they experience no direct input from the farmers’ side;
- (2)
- The soils in the former and existing vineyards are the most enriched with Cu and Zn. This likely results from the long-term intensive application of Cu- and Zn-based fungicides, especially during the Soviet period in state-owned collective farms, which were already present in 1930 and substantially expanded in the 1940s and 1960s, accelerating the industrialization of agricultural production, with possible additions from metal-contaminated irrigation water and fertilizers. DTPA-extractable Cu and Zn concentrations in those soils reach toxic levels for crops and can deteriorate the quality and quantity of the agricultural produce;
- (3)
- Increased concentrations of plant-available Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were mainly associated with irrigation water and intensive use of fungicides; Fe, Mn, and Ni were closely linked to several factors, such as the mineralogical composition of soils, mineral and organic fertilizers inputs, and atmospheric deposition from diffuse sources, where exhausts from transport are probably the primary source. During our study, we attempted to differentiate irrigation water inputs from fungicides using simulations based on irrigation patterns, irrigation water quality, and fungicide application rates and their metal content. The simulation revealed that the intensive application of fungicides, especially in vineyards, is more significant in enriching soils with Cu and Zn than irrigation water, with an average annual input of 9.6 kg/ha/year of Cu and 4.3 kg/ha/year of Zn. Nowadays, those amounts are reduced to 5 kg/ha/year of Cu and 1 kg/ha/year of Zn;
- (4)
- Organic fertilizer inputs are affecting Fe, Mn, and Ni availability to plants, while mineral fertilizers are linked with total Ni and Cd accumulation and, to a smaller extent, the Ni plant-available pool;
- (5)
- Cd is the element of concern among toxic elements studied. Its concentration exceeds the MPC level set by the legislative norm in Georgia (2 mg/kg) in 76% of samples. However, according to the EF index, in the majority (96%) of the samples, Cd can have a natural origin without substantial impact from anthropogenic sources. In contrast, Cd availability to plants is affected by contaminated irrigation water and fungicide application;
- (6)
- Pb rarely exceeds its legislative threshold level and is less affected by agricultural practices, but its plant-available pool is nearly equally affected by irrigation water and fungicide applications and atmospheric deposition from diffuse sources;
- (7)
- Maintenance of OM content in soil and its improvement by the application of organic fertilizers, green manures, and crop residue management, especially changing surface residue burning practices, would benefit agricultural production and reduce the availability of heavy metals to plants;
- (8)
- This study indicates the necessity of understating the cumulative impact of agricultural practices, including irrigation, fertilizer, and pesticide applications and raising awareness among farmers to minimize inputs of harmful substances while improving soil fertility or protecting crops from diseases and pests.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ahrends, H.E.; Siebert, S.; Rezaei, E.E.; Seidel, S.J.; Hüging, H.; Ewert, F.; Döring, T.; Rueda-Ayala, V.; Eugster, W.; Gaiser, T. Nutrient Supply Affects the Yield Stability of Major European Crops—A 50 Year Study. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 16, 014003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timsina, J. Can Organic Sources of Nutrients Increase Crop Yields to Meet Global Food Demand? Agronomy 2018, 8, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora, N.K. Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 1, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornick, S.B. Factors Affecting the Nutritional Quality of Crops. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1992, 7, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tóth, G.; Hermann, T.; Da Silva, M.R.; Montanarella, L. Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of the European Union with Implications for Food Safety. Environ. Int. 2016, 88, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baaken, M.C. Sustainability of Agricultural Practices in Germany: A Literature Review along Multiple Environmental Domains. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2022, 22, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, A.E.; Poulton, P.R. The Importance of Long-Term Experiments in Agriculture: Their Management to Ensure Continued Crop Production and Soil Fertility; the Rothamsted Experience. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2018, 69, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolbe, H. Comparative Analysis of Soil Fertility, Productivity and Sustainability of Organic Farming in Central Europe—Part 1: Effect of Medium Manifestations on Conversion, Fertilizer Types and Cropping Systems. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Werf, H.M.G.; Petit, J. Evaluation of the Environmental Impact of Agriculture at the Farm Level: A Comparison and Analysis of 12 Indicator-Based Methods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 93, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzouramani, I.; Mantziaris, S.; Karanikolas, P. Assessing Sustainability Performance at the Farm Level: Examples from Greek Agricultural Systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiwakoti, S.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Gollany, H.T.; Kleber, M.; Xing, B.; Astatkie, T. Macronutrient in Soils and Wheat from Long-Term Agroexperiments Reflects Variations in Residue and Fertilizer Inputs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Denton-Thompson, S.M.; Sayer, E.J. Micronutrients in Food Production: What Can We Learn from Natural Ecosystems? Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhaliwal, S.S.; Naresh, R.K.; Mandal, A.; Singh, R.; Dhaliwal, M.K. Dynamics and Transformations of Micronutrients in Agricultural Soils as Influenced by Organic Matter Build-Up: A Review. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2019, 1–2, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Agriculture, Water, and Land Policies to Scale up Sustainable Agrifood Systems in Georgia; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Neudert, R.; Theesfeld, I.; Didebulidze, A.; Allahverdiyeva, N.; Beckmann, V. Understanding Causes of Conflict over Common Village Pastures–a Comparative Analysis of Property Rights in Azerbaijan and Georgia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2020, 33, 347–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tóth, G.; Jones, A.; Montanarella, L. LUCAS Topsoil Survey Methodology, Data and Results. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ccc3b062-10e3-4328-b858-365c3a3667b6/language-en (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Collect Mobile–Open Foris. Available online: https://openforis.org/tools/collect-mobile/ (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil pH Determination; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Electrical Conductivity, Soil/Water, 1:5; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Calcium Carbonate Equivalent. Volumetric Calcimeter Method; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Organic Carbon Walkley-Black Method: Titration and Colorimetric Method; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kachinskii, N.A. Soil Physics; High School: Moscow, Russia, 1965. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- United States. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Science Division. Soil Survey Manual; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
- Shein, E.V. The Particle-Size Distribution in Soils: Problems of the Methods of Study, Interpretation of the Results, and Classification. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2009, 42, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Available Phosphorus–Olsen Method; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Faithfull, N.T. Methods in Agricultural Chemical Analysis: A Practical Handbook; Cabi Pub: Oxon, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 11260:2018; Soil Quality—Determination of Effective Cation Exchange Capacity and Base Saturation Level Using Barium Chloride Solution. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
- FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Available Micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and Heavy Metals (Ni, Pb, Cd), DTPA Extraction Method; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- ISO 11466:1995; Soil quality—Extraction of Trace Elements Soluble in Aqua Regia. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
- Ching, J.; Phoon, K.-K.; Li, D.-Q. Robust Estimation of Correlation Coefficients among Soil Parameters under the Multivariate Normal Framework. Struct. Saf. 2016, 63, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salminen, R.; Tarvainen, T. The Problem of Defining Geochemical Baselines. A Case Study of Selected Elements and Geological Materials in Finland. J. Geochem. Explor. 1997, 60, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sappa, G.; Barbieri, M.; Andrei, F. Assessment of Trace Elements Natural Enrichment in Topsoil by Some Italian Case Studies. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim, Z.; Qureshi, B.A.; Mumtaz, M. Geochemical Baseline Determination and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals in Urban Soils of Karachi, Pakistan. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z.; Cai, M.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; He, J. Baseline Values for Metals in Soils on Fildes Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica: The Extent of Anthropogenic Pollution. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 184, 7013–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gambashidze, G.O.; Urushadze, T.F.; Blum, W.E.; Mentler, A.F. Heavy Metals in Some Soils of Western Georgia. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2014, 47, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antoniadis, V.; Golia, E.E.; Liu, Y.-T.; Wang, S.-L.; Shaheen, S.M.; Rinklebe, J. Soil and Maize Contamination by Trace Elements and Associated Health Risk Assessment in the Industrial Area of Volos, Greece. Environ. Int. 2019, 124, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Withanachchi, S.; Ghambashidze, G.; Kunchulia, I.; Urushadze, T.; Ploeger, A. Water Quality in Surface Water: A Preliminary Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination of the Mashavera River, Georgia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.; Gu, X. Enrichment, Contamination, Ecological and Health Risks of Toxic Metals in Agricultural Soils of an Industrial City, Northwestern China. J. Trace Elements Miner. 2022, 3, 100043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, K.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, S.; Ma, Y. Contamination Characteristics, Source Analysis, and Ecological Risk Assessment of Toxic Metals and Metalloid in Agricultural Soil in Yuzhong, China. J. Environ. Qual. 2020, 50, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Yinan, L.; Ting, Z. The Analysis and Evaluation on Heavy Metal Pollution of Topsoil in Chinese Large-Scale Cities. Energy Procedia 2012, 16, 1084–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayraklı, B.; Dengiz, O. Determination of Heavy Metal Risk and Their Enrichment Factor in Intensive Cultivated Soils of Tokat Province. Eurasian J. SOIL Sci. 2019, 8, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Ren, B.; Hursthouse, A.S.; Thacker, J.R.M.; Wang, Z. Soil from an Abandoned Manganese Mining Area (Hunan, China): Significance of Health Risk from Potentially Toxic Element Pollution and Its Spatial Context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Order of the Minister of Laboratory, Health and Social Protection of Georgia No. 297/N, on the approval of norms of the qualitative state of the environment. Tbilisi, Georgia. 2001. (In Georgian)
- Abdullah, M.I.C.; Sah, A.S.R.M.; Haris, H. Geoaccumulation Index and Enrichment Factor of Arsenic in Surface Sediment of Bukit Merah Reservoir, Malaysia. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2020, 31, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geojournal 1969, 2, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, M. The Importance of Enrichment Factor (EF) and Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo) to Evaluate the Soil Contamination. J. Geol. Geophys. 2016, 5, 1000237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law of Georgia on Ownership of Agricultural Lands. 22 March 1996. (In Georgian)
- McGovern, P.; Jalabadze, M.; Batiuk, S.; Callahan, M.P.; Smith, K.E.; Hall, G.R.; Kvavadze, E.; Maghradze, D.; Rusishvili, N.; Bouby, L.; et al. Early Neolithic Wine of Georgia in the South Caucasus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E10309–E10318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tatarashvili, N.; Auch, E.-M. Footprints of Germans in the South Caucasus; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH: Bonn, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Akhvlediani, N.; Asatiani, G.; Arabic, T.; Bagdasarashvili, Z. Agro-Rules of Viticulture; Tbilisi, Georgia, 1985. (In Georgian) [Google Scholar]
- Farzadfar, S.; Knight, J.D.; Congreves, K.A. Soil Organic Nitrogen: An Overlooked but Potentially Significant Contribution to Crop Nutrition. Plant Soil 2021, 462, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vilkienė, M.; Ambrazaitienė, D.; Karčauskienė, D.; Dabkevičius, Z. Assessment of Soil Organic Matter Mineralization under Various Management Practices. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2016, 66, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadrasnia, A.; de Bona Muñoz, I.; Yáñez, E.H.; Lamkaddam, I.U.; Mora, M.; Ponsá, S.; Ahmed, M.; Argelaguet, L.L.; Williams, P.M.; Oatley-Radcliffe, D.L. Sustainable Nutrient Recovery from Animal Manure: A Review of Current Best Practice Technology and the Potential for Freeze Concentration. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansen, C.; Edwards, D.G.; Loneragan, J.F. Interactions between Potassium and Calcium in Their Absorption by Intact Barley Plants. I. Effects of Potassium on Calcium Absorption. Plant Physiol. 1968, 43, 1717–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J. High Potassium to Magnesium Ratio Affected the Growth and Magnesium Uptake of Three Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Cultivars. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 2813–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yruela, I. Copper in Plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adriano, D.C. Trace Elements in Terrestrial Environments; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, B. Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Michaud, A.M.; Bravin, M.N.; Galleguillos, M.; Hinsinger, P. Copper Uptake and Phytotoxicity as Assessed in Situ for Durum Wheat (Triticum Turgidum Durum L.) Cultivated in Cu-Contaminated, Former Vineyard Soils. Plant Soil 2007, 298, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komárek, M.; Čadková, E.; Chrastný, V.; Bordas, F.; Bollinger, J.-C. Contamination of Vineyard Soils with Fungicides: A Review of Environmental and Toxicological Aspects. Environ. Int. 2010, 36, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrzak, U.; McPhail, D.C. Copper Accumulation, Distribution and Fractionation in Vineyard Soils of Victoria, Australia. Geoderma 2004, 122, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brun, L.A.; Maillet, J.; Hinsinger, P.; Pépin, M. Evaluation of Copper Availability to Plants in Copper-Contaminated Vineyard Soils. Environ. Pollut. 2001, 111, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Felix-henningsen, P.; Urushadze, T.F.; Namrimandze, E.I.; Wichmann, I.; Steffens, D.; Kalandadze, B.B. Heavy metal pollution of soils and food crops due to mining wastes in an irrigation district south of Tbilisi, eastern Georgia. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2007, 5, 11–27. [Google Scholar]
- Felix-Henningsen, P.; Urushadze, T.; Steffens, D.; Kalandadze, B.; Narimanidze, E. Uptake of heavy metals by food crops from highly polluted Kastanozems in an irrigation district south of Tbilisi, eastern Georgia. Agron. Res. 2010, 8, 781–795. [Google Scholar]
- Felix-Henningsen, P.; Sayed, M.A.H.A.; Narimanidze-King, E.; Steffens, D.; Urushadze, T. (2011): Bound forms and plant availability of heavy metals in irrigated, highly polluted Kastanozems in the Mashavera valley, SE Georgia. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2011, 9, 111–119. [Google Scholar]
- Matchavariani, L.; Kalandadze, B. Pollution of Soils by Heavy Metals from Irrigation near Mining Region of Georgia. Forum Geogr. 2012, XI, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghambashidze, G.; Kentchiashvili, N.; Tarkhnishvili, M.; Meskhi, T.; Mgaloblishvili, E. 2.2. 11. Pollution of agricultural soils with heavy metals through irrigation water in Eastern Georgia. TION 2018, 446. [Google Scholar]
- CropWat|Land & Water|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/cropwat/en/ (accessed on 6 May 2024).
- Aydın, Y. Quantification of Water Requirement of Some Major Crops under Semi-Arid Climate in Turkey. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ezzahouani, A.; Valancogne, C.; Pieri, P.; Amalak, T.; Gaudillère, J.-P. Water Economy by Italia Grapevines under Different Irrigation Treatments in a Mediterranean Climate. OENO One 2007, 41, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abatzoglou, J.T.; Dobrowski, S.Z.; Parks, S.A.; Hegewisch, K.C. TerraClimate, a High-Resolution Global Dataset of Monthly Climate and Climatic Water Balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 170191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- RMG. Production History. Available online: https://www.richmetalsgroup.com/production-history/ (accessed on 6 May 2024).
- Vázquez-Blanco, R.; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.; Arias-Estévez, M.; Fernández-Calviño, D.; Pérez-Rodríguez, P. Changes in Cu Accumulation and Fractionation along Soil Depth in Acid Soils of Vineyards and Abandoned Vineyards (Now Forests). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 339, 108146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruyters, S.; Salaets, P.; Oorts, K.; Smolders, E. Copper Toxicity in Soils under Established Vineyards in Europe: A Survey. Sci. Total. Environ. 2013, 443, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernández-Calviño, D.; Nóvoa-Muñoz, J.C.; Díaz-Raviña, M.; Arias-Estévez, M. Copper Accumulation and Fractionation in Vineyard Soils from Temperate Humid Zone (NW Iberian Peninsula). Geoderma 2009, 153, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagostin, S.; Schärer, H.-J.; Pertot, I.; Tamm, L. Are There Alternatives to Copper for Controlling Grapevine Downy Mildew in Organic Viticulture? Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 776–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IFOAM. Strategy for the Minimisation of Copper in Organic Farming in Europe; IFOAM: Bonn, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Sonoda, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Wang, S.-L.; Ban, T. Copper and Zinc in Vineyard and Orchard Soils at Millimeter Vertical Resolution. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 958–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.-Y.; Liu, J.-S.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.-W. Accumulations of Copper in Apple Orchard Soils: Distribution and Availability in Soil Aggregate Fractions. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Bai, Y.; Luo, L.; Wan, J.; Wang, W.; Zhao, G. Effects of High Dose Copper on Plant Growth and Mineral Nutrient (Zn, Fe, Mg, K, Ca) Uptake in Spinach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 37471–37481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takkar, P.N.; Mann, M.S. Toxic Levels of Soil and Plant Zinc for Maize and Wheat. Plant Soil 1978, 49, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Navarro, F.J.; Jiménez-Ballesta, R.; Garcia-Pradas, J.; Amoros, J.A.; Perez de los Reyes, C.; Bravo, S. Zinc Concentration and Distribution in Vineyard Soils and Grapevine Leaves from Valdepeñas Designation of Origin (Central Spain). Sustainability 2021, 13, 7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, Y.; Zhang, F. Soil and Crop Management Strategies to Prevent Iron Deficiency in Crops. Plant Soil 2010, 339, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maqueda, C.; Herencia, J.F.; Ruiz, J.C.; Hidalgo, M.F. Organic and Inorganic Fertilization Effects on DTPA-Extractable Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn, and Their Concentration in the Edible Portion of Crops. J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 149, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojeda-Barrios, D.L.; Sánchez-Chávez, E.; Sida-Arreola, J.P.; Valdez-Cepeda, R.; Balandran-Valladares, M. The Impact of Foliar Nickel Fertilization on Urease Activity in Pecan Trees. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tkhelidze, A.; Liparteliani, R.; Mumladze, N.; Khomasuridze, D.; Danelia, G. Chemicalization of Agriculture and Environmental Protection; Community Knowledge: Tbilisi, Georgia, 2009. (In Georgian) [Google Scholar]
- Nicholson, F.A.; Chambers, B.J. Sources and Impacts of Past, Current and Future Contamination of Soil, Appendix 1, 1–28; ADAS: Mansfield, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Bisquert, D.S.; Castejón, J.M.P.; Fernández, G.G. The Impact of Atmospheric Dust Deposition and Trace Elements Levels on the Villages Surrounding the Former Mining Areas in a Semi-Arid Environment (SE Spain). Atmospheric Environ. 2017, 152, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Land Use | Number of Sampling Sites | pH | SOM (%) | Bulk Density (g/cm3) | CEC (cmolc/kg) | CaCO3 (%) | EC (dS/m) | P2O5 (mg/kg) | K2O (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orchard | 5 | 7.70 ±0.74 * | 5.73 ±1.09 | 1.25 ±0.07 | 55.64 ±1.09 | 4.35 ±4.17 | 0.16 ±0.05 | 40.98 ±52.48 | 661.30 ±386.82 |
Vineyard | 9 | 8.05 ±0.41 | 5.31 ±0.97 | 1.24 ±0.13 | 63.19 ±9.83 | 4.08 ±2.76 | 0.20 ±0.11 | 38.94 ±21.82 | 955.09 ±692.28 |
Former vineyard | 10 | 8.11 ±0.37 | 4.72 ±1.34 | 1.26 ±0.09 | 60.05 ±10.77 | 5.36 ±5.10 | 0.16 ±0.04 | 27.96 ±24.42 | 736.85 ±768.54 |
Arable, intensive | 14 | 8.21 ± 0.37 | 3.74 ±0.97 | 1.23 ±0.12 | 52.18 ±13.91 | 4.39 ±2.90 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 38.13 ±25.30 | 630.05 ±431.95 |
Arable, extensive | 20 | 8.08 ±0.44 | 4.46 ±1.20 | 1.18 ±0.13 | 59.22 ±13.24 | 4.70 ±5.18 | 0.14 ±0.03 | 22.96 ±15.30 | 404.45 ±181.19 |
Pasture | 25 | 8.14 ± 0.46 | 6.12 ±2.36 | 1.23 ±0.16 | 55.29 ±10.90 | 11.45 ±10.69 | 0.20 ±0.15 | 15.89 ±9.91 | 485.37 ±522.70 |
Land Use | Cu (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) | Fe (mg/kg) | Mn (mg/kg) | Ni (mg/kg) | Cd mg/kg) | Pb (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orchard | 4.53 ±2.40 | 1.25 ±1.19 | 59.43 ±88.85 | 50.80 ±26.16 | 2.68 ±1.45 | 0.20 ±0.08 | 1.24 ±0.25 |
Vineyard | 41.66 ±40.61 | 11.23 ±19.89 | 37.89 ±23.54 | 28.68 ±20.89 | 1.72 ±0.66 | 0.60 ±0.76 | 1.32 ±0.49 |
Former vineyard, currently with different land use | 46.95 ±16.14 | 18.17 ±17.85 | 23.86 ±18.40 | 55.81 ±47.88 | 2.26 ±0.85 | 0.74 ±0.48 | 2.00 ±0.84 |
Arable, intensive | 9.11 ±8.33 | 2.11 ±3.72 | 21.42 ±25.07 | 56.21 ±35.92 | 2.61 ±0.82 | 0.34 ±0.15 | 1.49 ±0.73 |
Arable, extensive | 4.97 ±4.64 | 0.97 ±1.24 | 12.35 ±7.33 | 86.65 ±72.23 | 3.89 ±2.02 | 0.26 ±0.12 | 2.03 ±0.58 |
Pasture | 5.30 ±8.15 | 1.09 ±1.89 | 16.34 ±14.94 | 75.49 ±46.15 | 2.50 ±0.95 | 0.23 ±0.13 | 0.93 ±0.40 |
Land Use/Main Crop Type | Cu (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) | Fe (g/kg) | Mn (mg/kg) | Ni (mg/kg) | Cd mg/kg) | Pb (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orchard | 48.89 ±16.24 | 80.58 ±12.35 | 38.42 ±14.08 | 671.40 ±157.58 | 73.64 ±34.01 | 3.16 ±0.93 | 20.70 ±11.09 |
Vineyard | 184.08 ±155.85 | 324.31 ±353.34 | 45.09 ±13.09 | 747.53 ±185.63 | 114.70 ±100.09 | 3.79 ±2.21 | 14.36 ±11.21 |
Former vineyard, currently with different land use | 300.01 ±131.64 | 310.86 ±166.27 | 36.90 ±8.48 | 1157.21 ±612.52 | 137.06 ±103.21 | 6.96 ±9.39 | 25.03 ±12.22 |
Arable, intensive | 76.99 ±35.84 | 108.40 ±54.58 | 34.91 ±11.04 | 1039.76 ±617.75 | 74.65 ±23.56 | 3.21 ±0.81 | 22.96 ±13.74 |
Arable, extensive | 63.71 ±22.05 | 115.63 ±49.96 | 29.81 ±7.92 | 1645.57 ±748.74 | 77.96 ±17.52 | 2.60 ±0.92 | 30.10 ±13.91 |
Pasture | 56.83 ±28.45 | 79.78 ±24.32 | 26.27 ±8.16 | 784.91 ±626.94 | 82.75 ±16.05 | 2.28 ±1.14 | 21.33 ±9.91 |
Baseline content * | 52.86 | 81.86 | 25.60 | 1057.64 | 93.69 | 3.01 | 28.49 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gventsadze, G.; Ghambashidze, G.; Chankseliani, Z.; Sarjveladze, I.; Blum, W.E.H. Impacts of Crop-Specific Agricultural Practices on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil in Kvemo Kartli Region (Georgia): A Preliminary Assessment. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104244
Gventsadze G, Ghambashidze G, Chankseliani Z, Sarjveladze I, Blum WEH. Impacts of Crop-Specific Agricultural Practices on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil in Kvemo Kartli Region (Georgia): A Preliminary Assessment. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104244
Chicago/Turabian StyleGventsadze, Giorgi, Giorgi Ghambashidze, Zaur Chankseliani, Ioseb Sarjveladze, and Winfried E. H. Blum. 2024. "Impacts of Crop-Specific Agricultural Practices on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil in Kvemo Kartli Region (Georgia): A Preliminary Assessment" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104244
APA StyleGventsadze, G., Ghambashidze, G., Chankseliani, Z., Sarjveladze, I., & Blum, W. E. H. (2024). Impacts of Crop-Specific Agricultural Practices on the Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil in Kvemo Kartli Region (Georgia): A Preliminary Assessment. Sustainability, 16(10), 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104244