Research on Consumer Trust Mechanism in China’s B2C E-Commerce Platform for Second-Hand Cars
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Model
2.1.1. Consumer Personal Factors
- Personal inherent trust tendency
- 2.
- Personal vehicle knowledge level
- 3.
- Personal online shopping experience
2.1.2. System Environmental Factors
- Laws and regulations
- 2.
- Third-party certification
- 3.
- Industry technology level
2.1.3. Website/APP factors
- Ease of use of the website/APP
- 2.
- Security of website/APP
2.1.4. Platform Company Factors
- Company size
- 2.
- Company brand reputation
2.2. Research Methodology
3. Empirical Analysis
3.1. Reliability and Validity Analysis
3.2. Model Test
3.2.1. Validation of the Structural Equation Model
3.2.2. Linear Regression Analysis
- Regression analysis of website/APP factors (X3) and consumer trust (Y)
- 2.
- Regression analysis of platform company factors (X4) and consumer trust (Y)
3.3. Results Summary
- (1)
- The influence coefficient of consumers’ personal trust tendency on the trust standardization path of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.083, and the ρ-value is 0.199, which is greater than the minimum requirement of 0.05 for the significance test and fails to pass the significance test. Hypothesis H1 is not valid. This may be because people are more cautious about goods such as cars on virtual trading platforms. Consumers’ old trust mechanisms cannot be transferred to something as new as online second-hand car trading.
- (2)
- The influence coefficient of consumers’ personal vehicle knowledge on the standardized path of trust of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.333, and the ρ-value is less than 0.001, passing the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.333, assuming H2 is valid. Its internal mechanism is as follows: people who know more about vehicle parameters will be more capable and confident to judge the quality of second-hand cars, so they are more likely to buy on second-hand car e-commerce platforms.
- (3)
- The influence coefficient of consumers’ personal online shopping experience on the standardized path of trust of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.520, and the ρ-value is less than 0.001, passing the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.333. Hypothesis H3 is valid. A second-hand car e-commerce platform is essentially similar to online trading platforms for other commodities. In addition, a second-hand car e-commerce platform will design the transaction process and services in line with the habits of online shoppers. Therefore, consumers with more online shopping experience will have lower psychological barriers to a second-hand car e-commerce platform and will be more likely to have purchasing behaviors.
- (4)
- The influence coefficient of laws and regulations on the standardized path of trust of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is −0.079, and the ρ-value is 0.143, which is greater than the minimum requirement of 0.05, and fails to pass the significance test. Hypothesis H4 is not valid. The reason may be that Chinese e-commerce law is not perfect, and it takes some time and process to popularize the law.
- (5)
- The influence coefficient of the third-party certification on the standardized path of trust of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.229, and the ρ-value is less than 0.01. It passes the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.229, assuming that H5 is valid. Third-party certification agencies can improve the trust in a second-hand car e-commerce platform in the eyes of consumers. The more authoritative the certification, the stronger the sense of trust.
- (6)
- The influence coefficient of industrial technology on the trust standardization path of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.508, and the ρ-value is less than 0.01. It passes the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.508. Hypothesis H6 is valid. The more technologically sophisticated the industry, the more trustworthy the commodity itself and the transaction itself. On the contrary, new energy vehicles are rarely traded on second-hand car trading platforms because their technology is not mature.
- (7)
- The trust standard coefficient of perceived ease of use of the website/APP of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.468, the ρ-value is less than 0.001, passing the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.508, assuming that H7 is valid. If the interaction design of a platform’s website/APP allows consumers to learn quickly and find the information they want easily, it will be easier to build trust.
- (8)
- The standard coefficient of trust of the perceived safety of the website/APP of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.328, the ρ-value is less than 0.001, passing the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.328, assuming that H8 is valid. Consumers receive security information such as website/APP security agreement terms and privacy protection measures. The easier this information is perceived by consumers, the stronger the sense of trust will be.
- (9)
- The standard coefficient of trust of the scale and strength of a company’s platform of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.312, and the ρ-value is less than 0.001, passing the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.312, assuming that H9 is valid. This is consistent with the general law of business, which is that the larger the company, the more people recognize its strength. Consumers are more likely to trade with large firms than small ones.
- (10)
- The standard coefficient of trust of a company’s brand reputation of a second-hand car e-commerce platform is 0.372, and the ρ-value is less than 0.001, which passes the significance test, and the influence degree is 0.372. Hypothesis H10 is valid. The better a platform’s brand reputation, the easier it is to create trust. Consumers tend to pay less attention to product performance and price due to brand trust.
4. Conclusions and Discussions
4.1. Theoretical Implications
4.2. Practical Implications
- Improve the Internet legal system and standardize the trading order of the second-hand car e-commerce platform.
- Increase publicity of legal knowledge to improve consumers’ cognition of second-hand car e-commerce trading rules.
- A platform should take consumer groups who prefer online shopping as the preferred target market.
- The selection and evaluation mechanism of service providers should be designed for the second-hand car e-commerce platform to ensure the service level of service providers.
- Introduce local third-party authoritative certifications, including second-hand car quality certification, e-commerce platform qualification certification, etc.
- The interface design of the platform should use colors and layouts that help consumers improve their trust and highlight information such as quality certification and transaction evaluation.
- Attach importance to brand image construction and maintenance, and constantly improve brand awareness and reputation.
- A second-hand car e-commerce platform should train the service team and improve the professional quality of the team.
4.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Akerlof, G.A. The Markets for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 1970, 84, 485–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.M.; Lee, S. Consumers’ initial trust toward second-hand products in the electronic market. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2005, 46, 85–98. [Google Scholar]
- Tajvidi, M.; Wang, Y.; Hajli, N.; Love, P.E. Brand Value Co-creation in Social Commerce: The Role of Interactivity, Social Support, and Relationship Quality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 115, 105238. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563217306271 (accessed on 8 November 2017). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alalwan, A.A.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Rana, N.P. Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by jordanian bank customers: Extending utaut2 with trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, K.D.W. Trust and tam in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Park, H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (scommerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Shen, X.L. Consumers’ decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 2015, 79, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Amri, D.; Akrout, H. Perceived design affordance of new products: Scale development and validation. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 121, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hillman, S.; Neustaedter, C. Trust and Mobile Commerce in North America. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 70, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Y.; Qureshi, I.; Sun, H.; McCole, P.; Ramsey, E.; Lim, K.H. Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-commerce Institutional Mechanisms. Mis Q. 2014, 38, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hartl, B.; Hofmann, E.; Kirchler, E. Do We Need Rules for “What’s Mine is Yours”? Governance in Collaborative Consumption Communities. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2756–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wan, J.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhao, L. How attachment influences users’willingness to donate to content creators in social media: A socio-technical systems perspective. Inf. Manag. 2016, 54, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Rashid, R.M.; Wang, J. Investigating the role of social presence dimensions and information support on consumers’ trust and shopping intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masele, J.J.; Matama, R. Individual consumers’ trust in B2C automobile e-commerce in Tanzania: Assessment of the influence of web design and consumer personality. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 86, e12115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jone, K.; Leonard, F.N.K. Factors influencing buyer’s trust in consumer to consumer E- commerce. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2014, 54, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
- Sutanonpaiboon, J.; Abuhamdieh, A. Factors influencing trust in online consumer-to-consumer (C2C) transactions. J. Internet Commer. 2008, 7, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorman, C.; Zaltman, G. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 81–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; Schoorman, F.D. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 709–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W. Consumer Trust in B2C E-commerce and the Importance of the Social Presence: Experiments E-Products and E-service. Omega Inter-Natl. J. Manag. Sci. 2004, 8, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.K.O.; Turban, E. A Trust Model for Internet Shopping. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2001, 6, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heyns, M.; Rothmann, S. Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 2015, 41, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luhmann, N. Trust and Power; John Wiley &Sons Vhichester: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, S. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Online Trust. Econ. Forum 2006, 23, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
- Koufaris, M. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, C. Measurement Research on Influencing Factors of Taobao Consumer C2C Mobile E-Commerce Trust; Nanjing University: Nanjing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; Kacmar, C. Trust in e-commerce vendors: A two-stage model. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2000, Brisbane, Australia, 10–13 December 2000; pp. 532–536. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Jin, X. Research on Customer Segmentation based on the perspective of trust and Distrust in online shopping. Manag. Mod. 2010, 1, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X. Research on Main Factors Influencing Consumer Trust in B2C Online Shopping Based on third-party Evaluation. J. Credit Res. 2013, 31, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, H.S.; Occeña, L.G. Influencing factors of trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce with gender andage. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Z.; Guan, S.; Miganin. The theoretical research of B2B E-commerce trust Model based on system. Sci. Res. Manag. 2004, 25, 76–810. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S. Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing initial Trust of Chi-nese B2C Consumers; Southwest Jiaotong University: Chengdu, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Z. Study on the operation mode of second-hand car e-commerce in the new retail era. J. Fujian Jiangxia Univ. 2020, 10, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
- Shankar, V.; Urban, G.L.; Sultan, F. Online Trust: A stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2002, 11, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, G. Research on Influencing Factors of Consumer Trust in Group-Buying Websites in the Context of Mobile E-Commerce; Yunnan University of Finance and Economics: Kunming, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, G.; Zhu, W.; Zhu, J. The formation mechanism of consumer trust in business online group-buying model. Ergonomics 2014, 20, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J. Research on Influencing factors of Consumer trust in B2C E-commerce. Mod. Commer. Ind. 2015, 36, 61–62. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, X. Research on Influencing Factors of Consumer Trust in B2C. Logist. Eng. Manag. 2019, 41, 114–115+60. [Google Scholar]
- McKnight, D.H.; Cummings, L.L.; Chervany, N.L. Chervany: Initial trust formation in new organization relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23, 473–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiang, L. Construction of theoretical model of Influencing Factors of Consumer trust in B2C E-commerce. China Bus. Theory 2020, 3, 27–28. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Le, Z.; Tang, X. Current Situation Analysis and Development Suggestions of Chinese Second-hand Car Market. Intern. Combust. Engine Accessories 2021, 3, 174–176. [Google Scholar]
Variables | Index | |
---|---|---|
Personal trust tendency | PT1 | I believe that in most cases, human nature is kind. |
PT2 | Generally speaking, I usually trust a person or thing, even if I don’t know much about it. | |
PT3 | I will not take the initiative to suspect a person until there is evidence that this person is not trustworthy. | |
Personal vehicle knowledge | PK1 | I have the experience of buying vehicles and have a certain understanding of the nature of vehicles. |
PK2 | I understand the basic knowledge of vehicles, such as engine, gearbox, chassis, etc. | |
PK3 | I understand the meaning of some vehicle performance parameters and can compare them, such as horsepower, torque, fuel consumption, etc. | |
Personal online shopping experience | PE1 | When I have shopping needs, I will choose to use e-commerce to find goods and have done online shopping. |
PE2 | I understand the process of online shopping, have dealt with customer service, and have tried after-sales service. | |
PE3 | During online shopping, I can smoothly complete the steps of product retrieval, order confirmation, online payment, etc. | |
Laws and regulations | LR1 | I know more about the existing laws and regulations related to e-commerce industry and automobile industry in China |
LR2 | I think the relevant e-commerce laws can effectively ensure the safety of online shopping. | |
LR3 | I think the relevant laws and regulations of the second-hand car industry can guarantee the rights and obligations of both parties. | |
Third-party certification | TR1 | I think the third-party certification is very important for the used car e-commerce platform. |
TR2 | I think the third-party authoritative certification provides guarantee for the capability and legal compliance of the second-hand car e-commerce platform. | |
TR3 | I believe that a third party can protect my rights and interests when the other party does not act in good faith. | |
Industrial technology | IT1 | I usually pay attention to the development of some industrial technologies and future technologies. |
IT2 | I think the technology of automobile industry can guarantee the quality of automobiles and meet my needs. | |
IT3 | I think the Internet night technology can enable me to use the Internet safely and efficiently. | |
Website/APP perceived ease of use | PU1 | The rationality of website interface design or APP interactive interface design helps me believe that the website can be used for the sake of users. |
PU2 | The timeliness of the response of the website or APP helps me believe in the authenticity of the platform’s information. | |
PU3 | When browsing the website or APP, when I encounter problems, if I can find official guidance on the website APP, I will feel very convenient. | |
Website/APP perceived security | PS1 | The authority and popularity of the certification party and partner of the website or APP will affect my judgment on the security of the website. |
PS2 | When browsing the website or APP, if the website or APP will inform the user of the personal information protection policy, then I think it is safer to change the website. | |
PS3 | When confirming the order and paying, if it is a traditional payment method (WeChat, Alipay, UnionPay card, etc.), I will feel that the transaction payment is safer. | |
company size | CS1 | I think large companies can provide me with better products and services. |
CS2 | I think a strong company can better meet my needs. | |
CS3 | If the brand awareness of the two companies is equal, I will choose the company with a larger market share. | |
Company brand reputation | CR1 | I think companies with good reputation can be more honest and trustworthy with consumers. |
CR2 | I think companies with high brand awareness pay more attention to consumer relationship maintenance. | |
CR3 | If both companies can meet my needs, I will choose the company with less negative comments. | |
Consumer trust | CT | I believe that the company has the intention and ability to provide products and services that satisfy me. |
Indicator | Evaluation Indicators | Value | Judgment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Able to Accept | Better | |||
χ2/df | 3~5 | 1~3 | 2.019 | Better |
RMSEA | 0.08~0.10 | <0.08 | 0.050 | Better |
GFI | 0.80~0.90 | >0.90 | 0.887 | Able to accept |
AGFI | 0.856 | Able to accept | ||
NFI | 0.80~0.90 | >0.90 | 0.889 | Able to accept |
TLI | 0.928 | Better | ||
CFI | 0.940 | Better | ||
PNFI | >0.50 | 0.741 | Better | |
PGFI | 0.783 | Better |
Indicators | χ2/df | GFI | AGFI | CFI | TLI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results | 3.168 | 0.893 | 0.860 | 0.895 | 0.875 | 0.073 |
Judgment | True | True | True | True | True | True |
Path | Estimate | B | S.E | C.R | ρ-Value | Sig. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: X11→Y | 0.043 | 0.083 | 0.034 | 1.285 | 0.199 | No |
H2: X12→Y | 0.121 | 0.333 | 0.021 | 5.810 | *** | Yes |
H3: X13→Y | 0.202 | 0.520 | 0.027 | 7.564 | *** | Yes |
H4: X21→Y | −0.079 | 0.151 | 0.054 | 1.465 | 0.143 | No |
H5: X22→Y | 0.101 | 0.229 | 0.043 | 2.337 | * | Yes |
H6: X23→Y | 0.508 | 0.843 | 0.085 | 5.979 | *** | Yes |
Variables | Non-Standardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 5.272 | 16.992 | 0.000 | 2.186 | |
X31 | 0.318 | 0.468 | 9.526 | 0.000 | |
X32 | 0.231 | 0.328 | 6.676 | 0.000 | |
Sig.F | Sig. = 0.000 | ||||
R2 | 0.552 | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.549 | ||||
Durbin–Watson coefficient | 1.826 |
Variables | Non-Standardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 5.312 | 13.064 | 0.000 | 2.465 | |
X41 | 0.221 | 0.312 | 5.232 | 0.000 | |
X42 | 0.293 | 0.372 | 6.247 | 0.000 | |
Sig.F | Sig. = 0.000 | ||||
R2 | 0.414 | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.411 | ||||
Durbin–Watson coefficient | 2.013 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, X.; Ma, J.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, R. Research on Consumer Trust Mechanism in China’s B2C E-Commerce Platform for Second-Hand Cars. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054244
Li X, Ma J, Zhou X, Yuan R. Research on Consumer Trust Mechanism in China’s B2C E-Commerce Platform for Second-Hand Cars. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054244
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Xueqian, Jiaqi Ma, Xinyu Zhou, and Ruixia Yuan. 2023. "Research on Consumer Trust Mechanism in China’s B2C E-Commerce Platform for Second-Hand Cars" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054244
APA StyleLi, X., Ma, J., Zhou, X., & Yuan, R. (2023). Research on Consumer Trust Mechanism in China’s B2C E-Commerce Platform for Second-Hand Cars. Sustainability, 15(5), 4244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054244