New Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia (Poland) Disseminate Knowledge about Local Geoheritage
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Aim and Research Methods
3. Study Area
4. Overview of Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia
4.1. An Unnamed Erratic Boulder in Żochy, Commune Ojrzeń, Ciechanów Poviat (No. 1 in Figure 2)
4.2. An Urban Inanimate Nature Trail in Pruszków (No. 2)
4.3. Lapidarium in Reguły, Michałowice Commune (No. 3)
4.4. Lapidarium at the Top of the Komorów River Dam Lake, Michałowice Commune (No. 4)
No. | Vol. [m3] | Weight [t] | Petrographic Type of the Rock, Name of the Indicator Erratic and Its Scandinavian Provenance, Characteristics of the Specimen’s Surface, Age |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.36 | 0.98 | Karlshamn granite from southern Sweden with large feldspars of tabular habit; age: 1.45–1.35 B |
2 | 0.2 | 2.24 | Småland granite from southeastern Sweden with an eolised surface; age: 1.75–1.5 B |
3 | 0.09 | 0.24 | Veined microgranite |
4 | 0.01 | 0.04 | Jotnian sandstone, eolian ventifact; age: 1.3 B; Figure 26 |
5 | 0.14 | 0.38 | Småland granite from southeastern Sweden with cavities from loss of weathered feldspar; age: 1.75–1.5 B |
6 | 0.07 | 0.19 | Microgranite, very well abraded, exfoliated in the upper part of the rock; Figure 27 and Figure 28 |
7 | 0.06 | 0.17 | Microgranite, gneissitic in places, with veins, glacial polish in upper part of rock |
8 | 0.05 | 0.13 | Småland granite from southeastern Sweden; age: 1.75–1.5 B |
9 | 0.07 | 0.19 | Coarse-grained granite with tabular feldspars, highly weathered with erosion-resistant feldspar crystals protruding above the rock surface |
10 | 0.63 | 1.72 | Gneiss with fold |
11 | 0.39 | 1.07 | Granitogneiss, strongly eolised, in the upper part of the rock exfoliated |
12 | 0.08 | 0.21 | Microgranite, with veins, partly abraded with a good edge abrasion, eolised |
13 | 0.29 | 0.81 | Åland quartz granite, eolised over large area, poorly exposed glacial polish from Komorów Lagoon; age: 1.7–1.5 B |
14 | 0.55 | 1.51 | Microgranite, exfoliated over large area, colonised by small epilithic flora |
15 | 0.22 | 0.61 | Åland quartz granite, very well abraded, eolised on the lagoon side, and here a visible corrasive microsculpture; age: 1.7–1.5 B; Figure 29 |
16 | 0.67 | 1.84 | Åland granite with a clear rapakivi structure; age: 1.7–1.5 B; Figure 18 |
4.5. The “Jędrek” Boulder in Wilkowyja, Garwolin Commune (No. 5)
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- The geo-entities mentioned in this paper, located in Middle Mazovia in central Poland, have the potential to serve as comprehensive tools with which to reach out to the general public and bridge the gap between laypeople and the field of geoscience. The chief aims of the regional geoheritage showcased in the paper and promulgated in the local community include the following:
- -
- Creating a place for education, recreation and relaxation;
- -
- Getting to know the geological heritage of the region in which they live;
- -
- Raising awareness of the unique geological past of Central Mazovia;
- -
- Creating a territorial identity within the region;
- -
- Drawing attention to the problem of protecting inanimate nature;
- -
- All these activities are part of the development strategies of Mazovian local authorities. Properly exposed natural sites that are inanimate play a crucial role in preserving and enhancing the geographical character of a place. This includes its environment, culture, aesthetics, heritage and the wellbeing of its inhabitants (cf. [41]).
- Four out of five of the geological sites are shaping the right pro-environmental, ecological attitude of the local inhabitants and tourists, who want to learn about the geological past of the region and the local geodiversity of Mazovia, who are sensitive to the protection of inanimate nature and who want to spend time outdoors in a unique way and deepen their knowledge of the history written in stone. The collections of erratic boulders were created in accordance with the principles of creating and managing hiking trails (e.g., [27,80,81,82,92]). The facilities (with the exception of No. 1) are accessible to people with reduced mobility.
- The described geosites are located in a peripheral tourist area, which, in the light of research (e.g., [46,47,48,49,50]), does not prevent the inhabitants from aspiring to live in smart cities. They satisfy the increasingly sophisticated needs of society through tourism, wellbeing and geo-ecosystem benefits. Finally, the smart management of natural resources, through citizen participation and/or expert assistance, can be a driver for innovation, with the overall goal of sustainable economic development and high quality of life (e.g., [25,33,86,87]).
- It cannot be overlooked that local initiatives raising awareness among the population and promoting all the values of geotourism will certainly help to raise awareness of the need to protect the Earth’s inanimate resources more than has been the case to date. Nevertheless, the authoress believes that each human being cares about a clean, beautiful and recognised little homeland.
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brocx, M.; Semeniuk, V. Geoheritage and geoconservation-history, definition, scope and scale. J. R. Soc. West. Aust. 2007, 90, 53–87. [Google Scholar]
- Newsome, D.; Dowling, R.K. Geoheritage and Geotourism. In Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management; Reynard, E., Brilha, J.B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 305–321. [Google Scholar]
- Reynard, E.; Brilha, J.B. (Eds.) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Migoń, P.; Pijet-Migoń, E. Not simply volcanoes—The geoheritage of the Cretaceous system in the Land of the Extinct Volcanoes Geopark, West Sudetes (SW Poland). Geotourism 2020, 17, 60–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafeiropoulos, G.; Drinia, H.; Antonarakou, A.; Zouros, N. From Geoheritage to Geoeducation, Geoethics and Geotourism: A Critical Evaluation of the Greek Region. Geosciences 2021, 11, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. A New Geosite as a Contribution to the Sustainable Development of Urban Geotourism in a Tourist Peripheral Region—Central Poland. Resources 2023, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macadam, J. Geoheritage: Getting the message across. What message and to whom? In Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management; Reynard, E., Brilha, J.B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 267–288. [Google Scholar]
- Pantazopoulou, Z.; Tsioukas, V.; Mouratidis, A.; Alexakis, D. Contribution of Remote Sensing in geoheritage management at two scales. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, Patras, Greece, 17–19 October 2022. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 2022, Sp. Publ. 10, Ext. Abs. GSG2022-330. [Google Scholar]
- Bâca, I. Curriculum for learning nature values. Case study: Learning geodiversity from Bistrita Ardeleana Gorge (Bistrita-Nasaud County, Romania). Geoj. Tour. Geosites 2015, 15, 14–24. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277299507 (accessed on 15 September 2023).
- Mosios, S.; Georgousis, E.; Drinia, H. The Status of Geoethical Thinking in the Educational System of Greece: An Overview. Geosciences 2023, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angiel, J.; Hibszer, A.; Szkurłat, E. Zajęcia Terenowe w Kształceniu Geograficznym od Teorii i idei Dydaktycznych do Praktyki Szkolne; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Mamoon, A. Geotourism: Why Do Children Visit Geological Tourism Sites? Dirasat Hum. Soc. Sci. 2014, 41, 653–661. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262932646_Geotourism_Why_Do_Children_Visit_Geological_Tourism_Sites#fullTextFileContent (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Zafeiropoulos, G.; Drinia, H.; Antonarakou, A.; Zouros, N. “Exploring the wondrous world of a limestone island”: A geoeducational program for the promotion of the geological heritage of Kalymnos island. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, Patras, Greece, 17–19 October 2022. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece2022., Sp. Publ. 10, Ext. Abs. GSG2022-091. [Google Scholar]
- Georgousis, E.; Savelides, S.; Mosios, S.; Holokolos, M.-V.; Drinia, H. The Need for Geoethical Awareness: The Importance of Geoenvironmental Education in Geoheritage Understanding in the Case of Meteora Geomorphes, Greece. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgousis, E.; Savelidi, M.; Savelides, S.; Mosios, S.; Holokolos, M.-V.; Drinia, H. How Greek Students Perceive Concepts Related to Geoenvironment: A Semiotics Content Analysis. Geosciences 2022, 12, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piotrowski, K. Dobry pomysł na biznes. Kamieniarstwo “głazowe”. Nowy Kamieniarz 2008, 34, 58–62. [Google Scholar]
- Chrząszczewski, W. Stoneman spod Konina. Nowy Kamieniarz 2009, 43, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
- Moskwa, K.; Miraj, K. Geotourism applied to the didactic and educational work of a geography teacher. Geotourism/Geoturystyka 2018, 1, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
- Bozatzi, A.; Periferakis, A. Geodidactics and CLIL: Synthesizing a syllabus for the ELT classroom through games, stories and technology. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, Patras, Greece, 17–19 October 2022. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 2022, Sp. Publ. 10, Ext. Abs. GSG2022-134. [Google Scholar]
- Świeca, A. Aktywne formy wypoczynku—Wyzwaniem współczesnego człowieka. In Turystyka Aktywna i jej Rozwój na Roztoczu-Regionie Pogranicza; Świeca, A., Kałamucki, K., Eds.; Kartpol s.c.: Lublin, Poland, 2006; pp. 13–20. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: http://trino.pttk.pl/ (accessed on 10 September 2023).
- Brzezińska-Wójcik, T.; Grabowski, T.; Moskal, A.; Pawłowski, A.; Wiechowska, I. Szlak Geoturystyczny Roztocza Środkowego; Informator-mapa turystyczna 1:50,000 (część opisowa); Wyd. Kartpol: Lublin, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Koźma, J. Ścieżka Geoturystyczna ”Dawna kopalnia Babina”. Europejski Geopark Łuk Mużakowa; Folder informacyjny; Lasy Państwowe; Nadleśnictwo Lipinki: Żary, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Elmi, C.; Simal, A.G.; Winchester, G.P. Developing a Rock Garden at Edith J. Carrier Arboretum, Harrisonburg VA (USA) as a Resource for Promoting Geotourism. Geosciences 2020, 10, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrión-Mero, P.; Herrera-Narváez, G.; Herrera-Franco, G.; Sánchez-Zambrano, E.; Mata-Perelló, J.; Berrezueta, E. Assessment and Promotion of Geotouristic and Geomining Routes as a Basis for Local Development: A Case Study. Minerals 2021, 11, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera-Franco, G.; Mora-Frank, C.; Kovács, T.; Berrezueta, E. Georoutes as a Basis for Territorial Development of the Pacific Coast of South America: A Case Study. Geoheritage 2022, 14, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stolz, J.; Megerle, H.E. Geotrails as a Medium for Education and Geotourism: Recommendations for Quality Improvement Based on the Results of a Research Project in the Swabian Alb UNESCO Global Geopark. Land 2022, 11, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetik, N. The Importance of Interpretatıon Role of Tour Guıdes in Geotourısm: Can We Called Them as Geotour Guıdes? Int. J. Educ. Soc. Sci. 2016, 3, 41–53. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/34545497/The_Importance_of_Interpretat%C4%B1on_Role_of_Tour_Gu%C4%B1des_in_Geotour%C4%B1sm_Can_We_Called_Them_as_Geotour_Gu%C4%B1des (accessed on 15 September 2023).
- Tormey, D. New approaches to communication and education through geoheritage. Int. J. Geoheritage Parks 2019, 7, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubalíková, L.; Bajer, A.; Balková, M. Brief Notes on Geodiversity and Geoheritage Perception by the Lay Public. Geosciences 2021, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasquaré Mariotto, F.; Drymoni, K.; Bonali, F.L.; Tibaldi, A.; Corti, N.; Oppizzi, P. Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review. Resources 2023, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. The most valuable erratic boulders in the Wielkopolska region of western Poland and their potential to promote geotourism. GeoJournal Tour. Geosites 2020, 29, 694–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. New geotourist objects in southern Podlasie. Przegląd Geol. 2020, 68, 91–99. Available online: https://www.pgi.gov.pl/dokumenty-pig-pib-all/publikacje-2/przeglad-geologiczny/2020/2-luty/7591-nowe-obiekty-geoturystyczne-na-poludniowym-podlasiu/file.html (accessed on 2 September 2023). (In Polish).
- Górska-Zabielska, M. The Rock Garden of the Institute of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University—A New Geo-site in Kielce, Central Poland. Geosciences 2021, 11, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. Geoheritage in a Forest: Traces of Ice Sheets in Pałuki, Western Poland. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. Die Rolle und Bedeutung von Findlingsgärten aus polnischer Perspektive. Geschiebekd. Aktuell 2022, 38, 107–121. [Google Scholar]
- Górska-Zabielska, M.; Zabielski, R. Geotourism Development in an Urban Area based on the Local Geological Heritage (Pruszków, Central Mazovia, Poland). In Urban Geomorphology. Landforms and Processes in Cities; Thornbush, M.J., Allen, C.D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hose, T.A. Geotourism and Interpretation. In Geotourism; Dowling, R.K., Newsome, D., Eds.; Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 221–241. [Google Scholar]
- Hose, T.A. 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage 2012, 4, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowling, R.; Newsome, D. (Eds.) Geotourism; Elsevier/Heineman Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- National Geographic. Geotourism. Available online: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/maps/article/about-geotourism (accessed on 14 September 2023).
- Lacey, P. Green Walls: An Introduction to the Flora and Fauna of Walls; Natural England Technical Information Note TIN030; Natural England: Peterborough, UK, 2009.
- De Wever, P.; Guiraud, M. Chapter 7—Geoheritage and Museums. In Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management; Reynard, E., Brilha, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Geert, F. In situ interpretation and ex situ museum display of geology. New opportunities for a geoheritage based dialogue? Int. J. Geoheritage Parks 2019, 7, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szkup, R.; Michalski, T. Turystyka w strefach podmiejskich polskich miast: Kierunki badań i wyzwania. Czas. Geogr. 2022, 93, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A. Selected aspects of smart city on the example of Szczecin. Bus. Inform. 2017, 4, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bifulco, F.; Tregua, M. Service Innovation and Smart Cities: Linking the Perspectives. In Innovating in Practice. Perspectives and Experiences; Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C., Nuutinen, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2018; pp. 261–287. [Google Scholar]
- Hajduk, S. Smart City Model and Urban Spatial Management. Gospod. Narodowa. Pol. J. Econ. 2020, 302, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Development Strategy for the City of Pruszków for 2021–2030. Pruszków Town Hall, 2021. Available online: https://www.pruszkow.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strategia_Pruszkow_20210302.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
- Regional Innovation Strategy for Mazovia until 2030, 2021. Available online: https://innowacyjni.mazovia.pl/upload/pages/2321/2321-0.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Available online: http://geostanowiska.pgi.gov.pl/gsapp_v2/ObjectDetails.aspx?id=456 (accessed on 15 September 2023).
- Czernicka-Chodkowska, D. Tropem Głazów Narzutowych; Zarząd Główny Ligi Ochrony Przyrody; Wydawnictwo Ligi Ochrony Państwa: Warszawa, Poland, 1990; Volume 39. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: http://mct.org.pl/pomniki-przyrody-i-obiekty-przyrodnicze-w-gminie-halinow/ (accessed on 15 September 2023).
- Available online: https://um.warszawa.pl/-/glaz-sprzed-miliarda-lat-przejechal-przez-warszawe (accessed on 14 September 2023).
- Czubla, P.; Gałązka, D.; Górska, M. Fennoscandian indicator erratics in glacial tills of Poland. Przegląd Geol. 2006, 54, 352–362. [Google Scholar]
- Górska-Zabielska, M. Obszary macierzyste skandynawskich eratyków przewodnich osadów ostatniego zlodowacenia północno-zachodniej Polski i północno-wschodnich Niemiec. Geologos 2008, 14, 177–194. Available online: https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/items/f25d0ef0-2230-477c-ac84-ff5ff7a2c08c (accessed on 17 September 2023).
- Zandstra, J.G. Platenatlas van Noordelijke Kristalijne Gidsgesteenten; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Smed, P.; Ehlers, J. Steine aus Dem Norden. Geschiebe als Zeugen der Eiszeit in Norddeutschland; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin/Stuttgart, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Rudolph, F. Beach stones. In Collecting & Determining Stones on the Baltic Coast, 11th ed.; Wachholtz: Neumünster, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Rudolph, F. The Big Book of Beach Stones; The 300 Most Common Stones on the Coast of North and Baltic Sea; Wachholtz Murmann Publishers: Neumünster, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Garofano, M. Geowatching, a Term for the Popularisation of a Geological Heritage. Geoheritage 2015, 7, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czubla, P.; Petera-Zganiacz, J. Fotografia dokumentacyjna w naukach o Ziemi. Folia Geogr. Phys. 2019, 18, 7–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wentworth, C.K.A. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J. Geol. 1922, 30, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, W. Geologischer Führer für den Norddeutschen Geschiebesammler; CW Verlagsgruppe: Schwerin, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Vinx, R. Gesteinsbestimmung im Gelände; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Artemieva, I.M.; Thybo, H.; Kaban, M.K. Deep Europe today: Geophysical synthesis of the upper mantle structure and lithospheric processes over 3.5 G. In European Lithosphere Dynamics; Gee, D.G., Tephenson, R.A., Eds.; Geological Society: London, UK, 2006; Memoirs; Volume 32, pp. 11–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasprizza, R. Small Spaces Make a Difference. Landsc. Aust. 1999, 21, 292–294. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, K.-D. Der Findlingsgarten von Hagenburg am Steinhuder Meer. Ur-Und Frühzeit 1981, 2, 4–13. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, K.-D. Der Findlingsgärten in Niedersachsen. Arch. Geschiebekd. 2006, 5, 323–338. [Google Scholar]
- Szarzyńska, A. Wzgórza Dylewskie terenową wystawą muzealną głazów narzutowych. Nat. Przyr. Warm. I Mazur 2015, 4, 26–37. [Google Scholar]
- Górska-Zabielska, M.; Dobracki, R. Petrographic Garden in Moryń—A new geotouristic attraction in western Poland. Landf. Anal. 2015, 29, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keiter, M. Die “Großen Sieben” und der neue Findlingsgarten in Bielefeld—Botschafter vom saalezeitlichen Eisrand. Geschiebekd. Aktuell 2017, 33, 119–129. [Google Scholar]
- Solon, J.; Borzyszkowski, J.; Bidłasik, M.; Richling, A.; Badora, K.; Balon, J.; Brzezińska-Wójcik, T.; Chabudziński, Ł.; Dobrowolski, R.; Grzegorczyk, I.; et al. Physico-geographical mesoregions of Poland: Verification and adjustment of boundaries on the basis of contemporary spatial data. Geogr. Pol. 2018, 91, 143–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richling, A.; Solon, J.; Macias, A.; Balon, J.; Borzyszkowski, J.; Kistowski, M. (Eds.) Regionalna Geografia Fizyczna Polski; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Nitychoruk, J.; Zbucki, Ł.; Rychel, J.; Woronko, B.; Marks, L. Extent and Dynamics of the Saalian Ice-Sheet Margin in Neple, Eastern Poland. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finl. 2018, 90, 85–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marks, L.; Bińka, K.; Woronko, B.; Majecka, A.; Teodorski, A. Revision of the Late Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy and palaeoclimate in Poland. Quat. Int. 2019, 534, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://zywaplaneta.pl/morskie-pietra-izotopowe-mis/ (accessed on 15 September 2023).
- Marks, L.; Dzierżek, J.; Janiszewski, R.; Kaczorowski, J.; Lindner, L.; Majecka, A. Quaternary stratigraphy and palaeogeography of Poland. Acta Geol. Pol. 2016, 66, 403–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kicińska-Świderska, A.; Słomka, T. Projektowanie tras geoturystycznych. Folia Tur. 2004, 15, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
- Rogowski, M. Czynniki decydujące o atrakcyjności turystycznej szlaków pieszych w świetle opinii przewodników i turystów. In Turystyka Polska w Latach 1989–2009, Warsztaty z Geografii Turyzmu; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego: Łódź, Poland, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stasiak, A.; Śledzińska, J.; Włodarczyk, B. (Eds.) Szlaki Turystyczne—Od Pomysłu do Realizacji; Wydawnictwo PTTK “Kraj”: Warszawa/Łódź, Poland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Malinowska, E.; Duda-Gromada, K.; Fuhrmann, M.; Suchożebrski, J. Przewodnik do Warsztatów Terenowych. Przyroda i Człowiek w Strefie Podmiejskiej Warszawy; Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych, Uniwersytet Warszawski: Warszawa, Poland, 2019; Available online: https://wgsr.uw.edu.pl/wgsr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Przyroda-i-cz%C5%82owiek-w-strefie-podmiejskiej-Warszawy_przewodnik.pdf (accessed on 7 November 2023).
- Iranzo-García, E.; Hueso-Kortekaas, K.; Fansa-Saleh, G. Conservation and Education in Spanish Geoparks: Exploratory Analysis of Land Stewardship Experiences and Valuation Proposal through Outdoor Education. Geosciences 2023, 13, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woroncowa-Marcinowska, T.; Jagielski, A. 2019. Available online: https://www.pgi.gov.pl/aktualnosci/display/11561-festyn-rodzinny-z-geologia-wgolaszynie.html (accessed on 20 September 2023).
- Hamoud, A.; El Hadi, H.; Tahiri, A.; Chakiri, S.; Mehdioui, S.; Baghdad, B.; El Maidani, A.; Bejjaji, Z.; Aoufa, M. Mauritanian geological resources: A lever for sustainable regional development via geotourism. Int. J. Geoheritage Parks 2021, 9, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farabollini, P.; Bendia, F. Frasassi Caves and Surroundings: A Special Vehicle for the Geoeducation and Dissemination of the Geological Heritage in Italy. Geosciences 2022, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirillova Ks Fu, X.; Lehto, X.; Liping Cai, L. What makes a destination beautiful? Dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment. Tour. Manag. 2014, 42, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ksenia, K.; Lehto, X. Destination Aesthetics and Aesthetic Distance in Tourism Experience. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2015, 32, 1051–1068. [Google Scholar]
- Ruban, D.A.; Sallam, E.S.; Ermolaev, V.A.; Yashalova, N.N. Aesthetic Value of Colluvial Blocks in Geosite-Based Tourist Destinations: Evidence from SW Russia. Geosciences 2020, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafeiropoulos, G.; Drinia, H. Effectiveness of the Geoeducational Assessment Method (GEOAM) in Unveiling Geoeducational Potential: A Case Study of Samos. Geosciences 2023, 13, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krzeczyńska, M.; Woźniak, P. Oblicza geologii—Przykładowe projekty ścieżek geoturystycznych. Przegląd Geol. 2011, 59, 340–351. [Google Scholar]
No. | Volume [m3] | Weight [t] | Petrographic Type of the Rock, Name of the Indicator Erratic and Its Scandinavian Provenance, Characteristics of the Specimen’s Surface, Age |
---|---|---|---|
1. | 1.59 | 4.36 | Opoka (sedimentary rock), bottom of the southern Baltic Sea; age: ca. 150–60 Mill |
2. | 0.16 | 0.43 | Eye-gneiss from the Baltic Shield, eolised surface relief, faceted rock; age: 1.2–1.5 B |
3. | 0.16 | 0.44 | Granite from the Baltic Shield, eolised surface relief, faceted rock; age: 1.2 B |
4. | 1.04 | 2.85 | Småland Granite (indicator erratic from SE Sweden), glacial polish, eolisation on the surface, lichen colonization; age: 1.2 B |
5. | 2.40 | 6.60 | Pyterlitic granite (indicator erratic from the Åland Islands), glacial striae on a polish; age: 1.5 B |
6. | 0.07 | 0.19 | Åland rapakivi granite (indicator erratic from the Åland Islands), faceted rock; age: 1.6 B |
7. | 0.16 | 0.44 | Åland quartz granite (indicator erratic from the Åland Islands), glacial polish; age: 1.6 B |
8. | 0.11 and 0.1 | 0.31 and 0.26 | Gneisses from the Baltic Shield, eolised surface relief, faceted rock; age: 1.2–1.5 B |
9. | 0.08 | 0.22 | Granito-gneiss from the Baltic Shield, light eolised surface relief; age: 1.2–1.5 B |
10. | 0.05 and 0.09 | 0.15 and 0.09 | Åland granite (indicator erratic from the Åland Islands), glacial polish, lichen colonisation; age: 1.6 B and another granite from the Baltic Shield |
No. | Vol. [m3] | Weight [t] | Petrographic Type of the Rock, Name of the Indicator Erratic and Its Scandinavian Provenance, Characteristics of the Specimen’s Surface, Age |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.56 | 1.54 | Småland granite from south-eastern Sweden, weathered rock fracture surface on car park side, slight eolisation near ground surface, locally colonised by lichens; age: 1.45–1.35 B |
2 | 1.93 | 5.32 | Gneiss with slightly eolised surface, surface exfoliation in the upper part of the rock, locally colonised by lichens |
3 | 0.18 | 0.49 | Småland granite from southeastern Sweden, with abrasive edges, locally colonised by lichens; age: 1.45–1.35 B |
4 | 0.08 | 0.21 | Åland rapakivi granite from the Åland Islands in the central Baltic, abraded edges, on the upper surface legible glacial striae; age: 1.7–1.5 B |
5 | 0.27 | 0.75 | Granitogneiss with vein, upper surface formed by glacial polish with clear glacial striae |
6 | 0.89 | 2.45 | Granite with vein, upper surface formed by glacial polish with concentric, crescentic burrs |
7 | 0.09 | 0.24 | Coarse-grained granite with abraded edges |
8 | 0.11 | 0.30 | Åland quartz granite from the Åland Islands in the central Baltic; highly weathered with eolian eroded cavities of non-erosion-resistant feldspar; abraded edges; age: 1.7–1.5 B |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Górska-Zabielska, M. New Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia (Poland) Disseminate Knowledge about Local Geoheritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216115
Górska-Zabielska M. New Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia (Poland) Disseminate Knowledge about Local Geoheritage. Sustainability. 2023; 15(22):16115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216115
Chicago/Turabian StyleGórska-Zabielska, Maria. 2023. "New Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia (Poland) Disseminate Knowledge about Local Geoheritage" Sustainability 15, no. 22: 16115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216115
APA StyleGórska-Zabielska, M. (2023). New Geoeducational Facilities in Central Mazovia (Poland) Disseminate Knowledge about Local Geoheritage. Sustainability, 15(22), 16115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216115