Next Article in Journal
Supposed Effects of Wetland Restoration on Hydrological Conditions and the Provisioning Ecosystem Services—A Model-Based Case Study at a Hungarian Lowland Catchment
Next Article in Special Issue
Climate Change Implications for Optimal Sizing of Residential Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Qatar
Previous Article in Journal
Smart and Novelty Villages as the Quality Place of Virtuality
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comprehensive Research on the Near-Zero Energy Consumption of an Office Building in Hefei Based on a Photovoltaic Curtain Wall

Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11701; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511701
by Haitao Wang *, Fanghao Wu, Ning Lu and Jianfeng Zhai
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11701; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511701
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 25 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Check the comments in the linked file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for your valuable suggestions for our manuscript. For easy viewing, we pack the Word file for you. Please refer to Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Page 4, figure 2, overlapping annotation text makes it difficult to see the content clearly.

2. Page 5, line 163, the average temperature is 31.2 ℃, but an equivalent thermal conductivity of 30 ℃ is used. The error between the two and its impact on subsequent results should be explained.。

3. Page 13, Figure 10 can include data on benchmark building energy consumption, showing the changes in Scheme 1.

4. Is the solution provided in the article universally applicable? Can the same effect be achieved under other buildings in the same climate zone?

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for your valuable suggestions for our manuscript. For easy viewing, we pack the Word file for you. Please refer to Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

line 161 average temperature is 31.60C, not 31.20C

line 163 change with uppercase letter for Kelvin

line 169 explain the meaning of “outbound temperature”

line 180 measurement units

line 226 correct the units for fluid density

line 227 correct units for heat transfer coefficient

line 293-294 correct units

Please explain why is necessary to rotate the office building? Why you don’t consider the real orientation of the building?

Why do you have different energy consumption values for lightning, cooling and heating for 900, 1800 and 2700?

line 331 change words “plan three” with “scheme three”. In this case the office building orientation did not affect the roof orientation. Did you use the same roof orientation for different building orientation?

line 343 unit for Area

 

I recommend to use for energy consumption the real orientation for office building.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you for your valuable suggestions for our manuscript. For easy viewing, we pack the Word file for you. Please refer to Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop