How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Literature Review
2.1. Green Supply Chain Innovation
2.2. Digital Capability Advantage
2.3. Digital Capability Advantage and Green Supply Chain Innovation
2.4. Inter-organizational Learning
3. Conceptual Model and Hypotheses Development
3.1. Digital Capability Advantage and Green Supply Chain Innovation
3.2. Digital Capability Advantage and Green Supply Chain Learning
3.3. Green Supply Chain Learning and Green Supply Chain Innovation
3.4. The Mediating Roles of Green Supply Chain Learning
4. Research Design
4.1. Sampling and Data Collection
4.2. Measures
4.3. Non-Response and Common Method Bias
4.4. Reliability and Validity
5. Data Analysis and Results
5.1. Hypothesis Testing
5.2. Robustness Tests
5.3. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Contributions
6.2. Managerial Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Measurement Scales
Digital capability advantage | |
DCA1 | We have the capability to monitor business operations and resources in real time. |
DCA2 | We have the capability to analyze big data with AI for process improvement and new business generation (e.g., intelligent defect detection, preventive machine maintenance, machine failure prevention). |
DCA3 | We have the capability to exchange digitalized data with our supply chain partners in real time for effective sales and operations and inventory planning. |
DCA4 | We constantly keep current with new digitalization technologies and innovative use cases. |
Green supply chain learning | |
Green supplier learning | |
GSL1 | We have acquired important environmental protection information from our major supplier. |
GSL2 | We have learnt new environmental management abilities from our major supplier. |
GSL3 | The relationship with major suppliers enhances our capacities to maintain sustainable development. |
GSL4 | We constantly learn better ways to work with our major suppliers jointly in dealing with environmental issues. |
GSL5 | We have established a strong capability in understanding green knowledge and skills of our major suppliers. |
Green customer learning | |
GCL1 | We have acquired important environmental protection information from our major customer. |
GCL2 | We have learnt new environmental management abilities from our major customer. |
GCL3 | The relationship with major customers enhances our capacities to maintain sustainable development. |
GCL4 | We constantly learn better ways to work with our major customers jointly in dealing with environmental issues. |
GCL5 | We have established a strong capability in understanding green knowledge and skills of our major customer. |
Green supply chain innovation | |
GSCI1 | We adopt and encourage new green products in the supply chain. |
GSCI2 | We exploit new green products and processes in the supply chain. |
GSCI3 | We invest heavily in new technology and uses it to innovate green products in the supply chain. |
GSCI4 | We encourage new employee ideas in the supply chain. |
GSCI5 | We radically adjust its strategy to adopt green innovation in its activities in the supply chain. |
GSCI6 | We improve the current green technology in the supply chain. |
GSCI7 | We improve its existing green products and operations in the supply chain. |
GSCI8 | We encourage employees to incorporate their environmental suggestions into its existing products and operations in the supply chain. |
GSCI9 | We continuously maintain production lines to reduce pollution in the supply chain. |
GSCI10 | We provide waste recycling systems in the supply chain. |
References
- Chiou, T.-Y.; Chan, H.K.; Lettice, F.; Chung, S.H. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2011, 47, 822–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Geng, C.; Yao, N. How does green digitalization affect environmental innovation? The moderating role of institutional forces. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022; in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Lai, K.-h.; Zhu, Q. Green supply chain innovation: Emergence, adoption, and challenges. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 248, 108497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melander, L.; Pazirandeh, A. Collaboration beyond the supply network for green innovation: Insight from 11 cases. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, D.; Xu, Z.; Ruan, Y.Z.; Lu, H. From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI). J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1518–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, J.; Cantor, D.E.; Montabon, F.L. How Environmental Management Competitive Pressure Affects a Focal Firm’s Environmental Innovation Activities: A Green Supply Chain Perspective. J. Bus. Logist. 2015, 36, 242–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Qiao, J.; Cui, H.; Wang, S. Realizing the Environmental Benefits of Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Roles of Green Supply Chain Integration and Relational Capability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ojha, D.; Shockley, J.; Acharya, C. Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 179, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solaimani, S.; van der Veen, J. Open supply chain innovation: An extended view on supply chain collaboration. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2022, 27, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, A.; Li, T. Gaining sustainable development by green supply chain innovation: Perspectives of specific investments and stakeholder engagement. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 29, 962–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Baah, C.; Afum, E. Do the roles of green supply chain learning, green employee creativity, and green organizational citizenship behavior really matter in circular supply chain performance? J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2022; in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Hu, H.; Tong, X.; Zhu, Q. Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 140, 102013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Fang, W.; Feng, T.; Gao, N. Bolstering green supply chain integration via big data analytics capability: The moderating role of data-driven decision culture. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 2558–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.Z. Impacts of digital transformation on eco-innovation and sustainable performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 393, 136278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, S.; Pan, X. The effects of digital technology application and supply chain management on corporate circular economy: A dynamic capability view. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 341, 118082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allenbacher, J.; Berg, N. How assessment and cooperation practices influence suppliers’ adoption of sustainable supply chain practices: An inter-organizational learning perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 403, 136852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Huo, B.; Haney, M.H.; Kang, M. The effect of buyer digital capability advantage on supplier unethical behavior: A moderated mediation model of relationship transparency and relational capital. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 253, 108603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khatib, A.W. The impact of big data analytics capabilities on green supply chain performance: Is green supply chain innovation the missing link? Bus. Process Manag. J. 2022, 29, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, T.; Noh, J.; Oh, Y.; Park, K.-S. Structural relationships of a firm’s green strategies for environmental performance: The roles of green supply chain management and green marketing innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 356, 131877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Yu, H. Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asiaei, K.; O’Connor, N.G.; Barani, O.; Joshi, M. Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 32, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajesh, R. Predicting environmental sustainability performances of firms using trigonometric grey prediction model. Environ. Dev. 2023, 45, 100830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J.; Fiorini, P.D.C.; Ndubisi, N.O.; Queiroz, M.M.; Piato, É.L. Digitally-enabled sustainable supply chains in the 21st century: A review and a research agenda. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 725, 138177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mak, H.-Y.; Max Shen, Z.-J. When Triple-A Supply Chains Meet Digitalization: The Case of JD.com’s C2M Model. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021, 30, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.; Rajesh, R.; Daultani, Y.; Misra, S.C. Resilience and sustainability enhancements in food supply chains using Digital Twin technology: A grey causal modelling (GCM) approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023, 179, 109172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, C.G.; Wagner, S.M. Blockchain and supply chain relations: A transaction cost theory perspective. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2019, 25, 100552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Wong, C.Y.; Chavez, R.; Jacobs, M.A. Integrating big data analytics into supply chain finance: The roles of information processing and data-driven culture. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 236, 108135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajak, S.; Parthiban, P.; Dhanalakshmi, R. Analysing barriers of sustainable transportation systems in India using Grey-DEMATEL approach: A supply chain perspective. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2021, 14, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S.; Singh, S.P. Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 152, 104505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, B.-G.; Kim, H.; Hur, D.; Subramanian, N. The dark side of supply chain digitalisation: Supplier-perceived digital capability asymmetry, buyer opportunism and governance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2021, 41, 1220–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavronski, I.; Klassen, R.D.; Vachon, S.; Nascimento, L.F.M.d. A learning and knowledge approach to sustainable operations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Shan, S.; Dai, J.; Che, W.; Shou, Y. The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 250, 108622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Jia, F.; Xu, Z. Towards an integrated conceptual model of supply chain learning: An extended resource-based view. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, H.T.; Pham, T.; Truong Quang, H.; Dang, C.N. Impact of transformational leadership on green learning and green innovation in construction supply chains. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2022, 30, 1883–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lisi, W.; Zhu, R.; Yuan, C. Embracing green innovation via green supply chain learning: The moderating role of green technology turbulence. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 28, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Afum, E.; Baah, C. Green corporate reputation and innovation: The role of non-supply chain learning and green supply chain knowledge. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2022; in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, F.M.; Eisenhardt, K.M. Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization. Organ. Sci. 2005, 16, 491–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haq, M.Z.U.; Gu, M.; Huo, B. Enhancing supply chain learning and innovation performance through human resource management. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2020, 36, 552–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, K.A.; Silva, M.E.; Pereira, S.C.F. (Un)Learning sustainability practices in a multi-tiered supply chain: An interpretive study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussinger, K.; Wastyn, A. In search for the not-invented-here syndrome: The role of knowledge sources and firm success. RD Manag. 2016, 46, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Jiang, M.; Li, T.; Jia, F.; Lim, M.K. Supply chain learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2023; in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benzidia, S.; Makaoui, N.; Bentahar, O. The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 165, 120557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, M.-L.; Wu, K.-J.; Lim, M.K.; Wong, W.-P. Data-driven sustainable supply chain management performance: A hierarchical structure assessment under uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamel, G. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 1991, 12, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, K.-h.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, Q. Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 175, 103145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Jia, F.; Brown, S.; Koh, L. Supply chain learning of sustainability in multi-tier supply chains. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2018, 38, 1061–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Lee, P.K.C.; Cheng, T.C.E. How to enhance the effects of the green supply chain management strategy in the organization: A diffusion process perspective. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 175, 103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Cen, L.; Zheng, Z.; Fisher, R.; Liang, X.; Wang, Y.; Huisingh, D. How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Inemek, A.; Matthyssens, P. The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2013, 42, 580–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Afum, E.; Acquah, I.S.K.; Baah, C. How does supply chain knowledge enhance green innovation? The mediation mechanisms of corporate reputation and non-supply chain learning. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2022, 38, 852–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, A. How specific investments influence NPD performance: Exploring the roles of supplier involvement and IT implementation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2021; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jean, R.-J.B.; Kim, D.; Chiou, J.-S.; Calantone, R. Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships. Int. Bus. Rev. 2018, 27, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Hou, L. How does green innovation affect supplier-customer relationships? A study on customer and relationship contingencies. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 90, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melander, L. Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gosling, J.; Jia, F.; Gong, Y.; Brown, S. The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1458–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasekaran, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Dubey, R.; Wamba, S.F.; Childe, S.J.; Hazen, B.; Akter, S. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Vijver, F.; Leung, K. Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Theory and Method, 2nd ed.; Allyn & Bacon: Needham Heights, MA, USA, 1997; Volume 1, pp. 257–300. [Google Scholar]
- Brislin, R.W. Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1970, 1, 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, J.; Li, S.; Capaldo, A. Green supply chain management, supplier environmental commitment, and the roles of supplier perceived relationship attractiveness and justice. A moderated moderation analysis. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 3523–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, S.M.; Bode, C. Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing. J. Oper. Manag. 2014, 32, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, J.S.; Overton, T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977, 14, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baker, W.E.; Grinstein, A.; Harmancioglu, N. Whose Innovation Performance Benefits More from External Networks: Entrepreneurial or Conservative Firms? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2016, 33, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spector, P.E.; Rosen, C.C.; Richardson, H.A.; Williams, L.J.; Johnson, R.E. A New Perspective on Method Variance: A Measure-Centric Approach. J. Manag. 2017, 45, 855–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Haq, M.Z.U. Supply chain learning and organizational performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. J. Knowl. Manag. 2020, 25, 943–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, B.; Haq, M.Z.U.; Gu, M. The impact of IT application on supply chain learning and service performance. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2019, 120, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.T. Linking big data, sustainable supply chain management and corporate performance: The moderating role of circular economy thinking. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 34, 744–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumarliah, E.; Al-hakeem, B. The effects of digital innovations and sustainable supply chain management on business competitive performance post-COVID-19. Kybernetes, 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, Z. Linking relation-specific investments and sustainability performance: The mediating role of supply chain learning. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2023; in print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author | Topic | Sample Data | Research Methodology | Research Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Son et al. (2021) [31] | What is the impact of buyer’s digital capability advantage on buyer opportunistic behavior? | 125 small and medium-sized firms in Republic of Korea | Empirical research | Buyers with superior digital capabilities compared to suppliers from small and medium-sized firms, making them more vulnerable to buyer opportunism. |
Liu et al. (2022) [13] | How does big data analytics capability drive green supply chain integration? | 317 Chinese manufacturing firms | Empirical research | Big data analytics capability positively contributes to green internal integration, green customer integration, and green supplier integration. Additionally, green internal integration serves as a mediator in the relationship between big data analytics capability and green supplier (customer) integration. |
Guo et al. (2022) [2] | What is the impact of green digitization on environmental innovation? | Panel data collected from Chinese listed companies and provincial information (excluding Tibet) spanning the years 2012 to 2018, a total of 19,752 sample observations were included. | Empirical research | Green digitization significantly promotes environmental innovation, and this effect can be achieved through the reinforcement of formal and informal institutional forces. |
Xu et al. (2023) [14] | What is the impact of digital strategy and capabilities on ecological innovation? | 10 Chinese manufacturing firms. | Empirical research | Digital strategy and capability play a significant role in promoting in ecological processes innovation, ecological products innovation, and ecological management innovation. |
Zhang et al. (2022) [17] | How does the digital capability advantage of buying firms reduce supplier unethical behavior? | 223 Chinese manufacturing firms | Empirical research | Buyers’ digital capability advantage indirectly decreases supplier unethical behavior by enhancing relationship transparency. |
Wu and Li (2019) [10] | Which factors influence green supply chain innovation? | 187 Chinese high-tech firms | Empirical research | Relationship-specific investment and knowledge transfer have a significant positive impact on green supply chain innovation. |
Al-Khatib (2022) [18] | What is the impact of big data analytics capabilities on dual green supply chain innovation? | 303 Jordanian manufacturing firms | Empirical research | Big data analytics capability has a significant positive impact on both green radical supply chain innovation and green incremental supply chain innovation. |
Characteristics | Frequency | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Firm size | Less than 100 | 63 | 28.5% |
100–1000 | 75 | 33.9% | |
1000–10,000 | 46 | 20.8% | |
More than 10,000 | 37 | 16.8% | |
Tenure in the industry | Less than 5 years | 21 | 9.5% |
5–10 years | 76 | 34.4% | |
more than 10 years | 124 | 56.1% | |
Tenure in the firm | Less than 5 years | 34 | 15.4% |
5–10 years | 69 | 31.2% | |
More than 10 years | 118 | 53.4% |
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | IFI | RMESA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five-factor model | 748.073 | 532 | 1.406 | 0.946 | 0.939 | 0.952 | 0.056 |
Model including the five factors and the method factor | 765.948 | 531 | 1.442 | 0.947 | 0.941 | 0.952 | 0.057 |
Variables | Measurement Items | Factor Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital capability advantage (DCA) | DCA1 | 0.857 | 0.913 | 0.916 | 0.728 |
DCA2 | 0.868 | ||||
DCA3 | 0.836 | ||||
DCA4 | 0.865 | ||||
Green supplier learning (GSL) | GSL1 | 0.810 | 0.915 | 0.920 | 0.713 |
GSL2 | 0.880 | ||||
GSL3 | 0.842 | ||||
GSL4 | 0.834 | ||||
GSL5 | 0.808 | ||||
Green customer learning (GCL) | GCL1 | 0.800 | 0.911 | 0.917 | 0.668 |
GCL2 | 0.835 | ||||
GCL3 | 0.818 | ||||
GCL4 | 0.826 | ||||
GCL5 | 0.870 | ||||
Green supply chain innovation (GSCI) | GSCI1 | 0.809 | 0.948 | 0.956 | 0.706 |
GSCI2 | 0.834 | ||||
GSCI3 | 0.876 | ||||
GSCI4 | 0.863 | ||||
GSCI5 | 0.794 | ||||
GSCI6 | 0.785 | ||||
GSCI7 | 0.811 | ||||
GSCI8 | 0.827 | ||||
GSCI9 | 0.834 | ||||
GSCI10 | 0.848 |
Mean | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. DCA | 3.887 | 0.795 | 0.853 | |||
2. GSL | 3.504 | 0.943 | 0.404 ** | 0.844 | ||
3. GCL | 3.532 | 0.896 | 0.501 ** | 0.631 ** | 0.817 | |
4. GSCI | 4.437 | 0.488 | 0.455 ** | 0.481 ** | 0.586 ** | 0.840 |
Path Relationships | Standardized Coefficient | Boot SE | Bias-Corrected 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | p | |||
DCA→GSCI | 0.465 | 0.022 | 0.011 | 0.048 | 0.000 |
DCA→GSL | 0.378 | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.034 | 0.000 |
DCA→GCL | 0.503 | 0.043 | 0.041 | 0.153 | 0.000 |
GSL→GSCI | 0.392 | 0.035 | 0.027 | 0.103 | 0.000 |
GCL→GSCI | 0.416 | 0.029 | 0.112 | 0.227 | 0.000 |
DCA→GSL→GSCI | 0.235 | 0.018 | 0.253 | 0.296 | 0.007 |
DCA→GCL→GSCI | 0.277 | 0.027 | 0.035 | 0.118 | 0.000 |
DCA→GSCL→GSCI | 0.242 | 0.035 | 0.107 | 0.366 | 0.004 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qiao, J.; Li, S.; Xiong, S.; Li, N. How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511583
Qiao J, Li S, Xiong S, Li N. How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective. Sustainability. 2023; 15(15):11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511583
Chicago/Turabian StyleQiao, Jianqi, Suicheng Li, Su Xiong, and Na Li. 2023. "How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective" Sustainability 15, no. 15: 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511583
APA StyleQiao, J., Li, S., Xiong, S., & Li, N. (2023). How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective. Sustainability, 15(15), 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511583