2.1. Waste Classification
Waste policy seeks to ensure the sustainable management of waste that cannot be prevented, ensuring efficient use of natural resources and promoting the principles of the circular economy. Waste management is based on a hierarchy that promotes prevention first, followed by preparation for reuse, recycling, valorization and, finally, disposal. The management of collection, transport, and treatment of waste is regulated in terms of urban waste and non-urban waste, these last including hospital and industrial waste, as well as hazardous waste.
There are several types of criteria for waste classification, from its origin (domestic waste, urban waste, industrial waste, nuclear waste, agricultural waste, among others), to its form/state (liquid waste, gaseous waste, sludge, powder, among others), its properties (toxic, reactive, acidic, alkaline, inert, volatile), and finally its legal definition (special, controlled, commercial waste, waste from specific flows such as Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV)).
These criteria allow the division of waste by certain classifications, such as the waste rows, which vary according to the type of material constituting the waste (e.g., glass row, plastic row, metal row, organic matter row, or paper and cardboard row). The specific waste flows relate to waste categories whose origin is transversal to various sectors of activity, or subject to specific management (e.g., WEEE, ELV, packaging, or packaging waste).
The correct characterization of waste and by-products is crucial for the proper functioning of the platform, and it is essential to carry out physical and chemical analyses that allow the correct identification of the baseline properties of each waste. In this way, users will intuitively be able to perceive the potential of the waste/by-products they intend to acquire and whether they serve the desired purpose.
2.1.1. Legal and Normative Requirements
To determine the matchmaking functionality of waste and by-products, it is necessary to carry out a survey of existing regulatory standards and requirements at a national level to ensure that the platform’s role will be framed in a duly constituted organized waste market, assuming a provider posture on commercial exchanges of materials.
Thus, it is fundamental to frame the objectives of the Upvalue platform with national and European strategic planning objectives regarding the classification and declassification of waste.
Waste classification must meet the definitions of community legislation, based on classification according to the European Waste List (LER), or European Waste Codes, present in the Waste Framework Directive, updated by Decision 2014/955/EC. These data relate to a harmonized list of waste that considers their origin and composition. The different residues included in the list are defined by a 6-digit code for residues and, respectively, two and four digits for chapter and subchapter numbers.
It should be noted that, by law, waste producers or holders must proceed with the separation of waste at source, before classification, promoting, whenever possible, its valorisation. In addition, they are required to classify the waste they produce or hold in accordance with the European Waste List [
15].
Furthermore, there are three different groups consulted according to a defined order, in the rules for using the LER. There is a group related to the source of waste, whether for example an industrial activity, a health care activity, or an urban origin. There is another group associated with the nature of the waste, such as waste oils, solvents or packaging. There is also a group for waste not specified elsewhere in the list, which concern specific flows.
After classification according to the LER, the process is followed by the assessment of the hazardousness of the waste. Regulation N.° 1357/2014 updates the hazardous characteristics of waste, as well as establishing a methodology, based on the principle of evaluating the individual hazardousness of the substances that constitute it, based on their concentration. The objective of the process is to correctly assign the LER code that best characterizes a given waste, so that it can later be sent to the most appropriate destination [
16].
In an initial phase, the study of the classification of waste according to the European Waste List, allowed reconciling different lines (type of material constituting the waste) and specific flows (categories of waste subject to specific management), families (industrial sectors of waste), and subfamilies (associated LER Codes), so that the platform works in an integrated way, implemented in a plan suited to the relevance of the different industrial sectors.
The defined ranks, which fit the categories for the taxonomy to be applied on the Upvalue platform, were the following: plastics; paper and cardboard; glass; metals; organic; wood; textiles; chemicals; construction materials; packaging; used oils; used tires; batteries and accumulators; end-of-life vehicles; and electrical and electronic materials.
The defined families were extractive industry waste; waste from the manufacturing industry; waste energy; waste from agriculture, forestry and fisheries, construction and demolition waste, waste from water distribution, sanitation and effluents, trade and services waste, and specific flow residues.
In addition, the study of the normative criteria for classifying waste leads to a set of guiding questions for the establishment of key concepts as starting point for data to be included in matchmaking [
17]:
- (a)
What is the source of the waste? Example: cement plant, bakery, bakery industry; glass production industry;
- (b)
What process gave rise to the waste? Example: Waste resulting from the casting process of raw materials for glass production? Waste resulting from the glass molding process? Waste resulting from the packaging process of glass products?
- (c)
Detailed description of the waste. Example: empty cartons used to package glass bottles;
- (d)
What are the constituents of the residue? Example: 95% cardboard, 5% heavy metals.
The generating source, the process, the description, and the constituents (nature of the waste) stand out. These indicators must be deepened, to enhance the application of artificial intelligence (AI) mechanisms to identify potential alternatives for their correct referral to a valorization action, from the perspective of industrial symbioses of waste and by-products.
2.1.2. Market Models
In line with the understanding of the waste system within the legal planning entities, and in view of implementing its classification, current markets for the purchase and sale of waste were also studied. These studies included waste classification, and the criteria underlying the submission of a quest for sale and purchase.
An exhaustive analysis of the markets for buying and selling of national and international waste was carried out, allowing the definition of a set of main categories and subcategories corresponding to waste streams and relevant transversal sectors in the context of waste in Portugal, as well as the opportunities for its valorization. These categories make a concrete taxonomy, facilitating the process of searching for or submitting a waste in the Upvalue marketplace: plastics; paper and cardboard; glass; metals; organic; wood; textiles; chemicals; construction materials; packaging; used oils; used tires; batteries and accumulators; end-of-life vehicles; and electrical and electronic materials.
In total, there are 288 subcategories comprising the 15 main categories defined, with each subcategory corresponding to an option of the type of waste, depending on the characteristics of the material and its origin. Like other market requirements, it was possible to identify a set of key indicators that should compose the classification of waste offered for sale on the marketplace. These main requirements include name, description, LER code, origin, shape and color, and additives.
2.1.3. Characterization of Waste Streams
Recognizing the economic, environmental, and technological opportunity associated with the waste mass flows with greatest potential for valorization at national level, research and development work should be focused on these categories. The characterization of these mass flows aims to identify potential restrictions and potentialities to their valorization, via the characteristics associated with each of them.
To obtain a complete and adequate characterization for any type of waste, a set of properties were selected based on data from Portuguese companies and their waste, which include: total organic carbon (TOC), BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene), pH, heavy metals, elemental and chemical analysis, among others. These properties stand out as examples, as far as the functioning and development of matchmaking are concerned, and for each of them, limit values and/or intervals can be established, based on scientific studies, and existing applications, targeting the identification of opportunities for valorization and industrial symbiosis.
Having carried out the characterization of these flows, and the grouping of waste into families with well-defined criteria by industrial sector, the importance of mapping the origin of waste is highlighted, with a view to its quantification and geographic distribution at the national level. This geographical distribution proves to be essential in defining one of the main criteria for matchmaking, location. This variable will make it possible to optimize industrial symbiosis chains between companies which are located closer together.
2.1.4. Waste Declassification
According to current legislation, certain resources may not be considered wastes, due to certain characteristics, identifying themselves as by-products or alternative raw materials [
18]. It is imperative to understand the classification criteria in this context so as to better frame the matchmaking algorithm. Based on the properties indicated by the waste producer [
19], the resource will be registered in a database, allowing it to be classified as a potential by-product or declassified as secondary raw material capable of being used in another industrial process or in the design of a new product.
2.1.5. Classification of By-Products and Alternative Raw Materials
By-products are substances or objects that result from a production process whose main objective is not their production, and which are used directly, without any other processing, other than normal industrial practice [
19].
From the by-product classification conditions result a set of factors whose relevance is fundamental for the attribution of key indicators, whether in terms of waste properties or in terms of technologies, to be applied in matchmaking.
For example, by fulfilling condition b of the by-product Classification Guide, the substance or object can be used directly without any further processing other than normal industrial practice. It is understood that processing considered “normal industrial practice” may include physical processes only, such as homogenization, gradation/sieving, compression/pressing; dehydration/drying, packaging, fragmentation/crushing, milling, mixture (as long as it does not change the dangerousness), washing, centrifugation, and cutting [
20].
At the level of classification of alternative raw materials, the ‘end of waste status’ applies to waste submitted to a valorization operation, including recycling, through which it is considered that the waste is transformed into a raw material, ready to be incorporated into the manufacture of products [
21]. This status meets the following conditions:
The substance or object is intended to be used for specific purposes;
There is a market or demand for that substance or object;
The substance or object meets the technical requirements for the specific purposes and respects the legislation and standards applicable to the products;
The use of the substance or object does not lead to globally adverse impacts from an environmental or human health point of view.
In the absence of definition of criteria at the European Union level, each member state has the authority to define criteria relating to certain types of waste [
21] which fulfill the aforementioned conditions, and which include:
acceptable waste for valorization operations;
authorized treatment processes and techniques;
quality criteria for non-waste materials resulting from valorization operations in accordance with applicable product standards, including limit values for pollutants, if necessary;
requirements applicable to management systems for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with ‘end of waste’ criteria, including quality control and internal monitoring and certification, if necessary;
a model declaration of conformity and the conditions for issuing and using it.
These factors are essential in establishing matchmaking, given the need to associate waste with valorization technologies, their properties, and technical declaration documents, whether by-product or ‘end of waste’ status.
2.2. Industrial Symbioses
Industrial symbioses are characterized as the practical application of circular economy principles. The concept of circular economy is based on an economic model that seeks to preserve the added value of products for as long as possible, maximizing the recovery of waste, and consequently minimizing the extraction of raw materials [
22].
The development of a sustainable, low-carbon, resource-efficient, and competitive economy requires the transition to a circular economy. The European Union has made efforts to integrate the principles of the circular economy (CE) into the policies of countries regarding waste management and product policy [
23]. However, in addition to this legislative ambition, a paradigm shift is needed so that the reincorporation of resources into production processes becomes a reality.
The growing number of scientific publications on industrial symbiosis, and its incorporation into regulatory and community policy programs, such as the Waste Framework Directive—EU 2018, the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (EU 2011), and the expansion of environmental action consultancies, demonstrate that this concept is a promising path for sustainable development.
Industrial symbioses stand out as collaborative models that allow expanding competitive gains—economic, environmental, and social [
24]. Cumulative network gains will always be greater than those a company could achieve acting alone. This type of collaboration may involve various types of actions, such as:
Use of collaborative platforms;
Identification of opportunities to replace raw materials with waste/by-products or create new businesses;
Redesign of supply systems to accommodate products and services that use renewable resources or that allow the collection and reprocessing of equipment, to expand the useful life within the activity.
Despite the recent increase in the development of technical-scientific knowledge on industrial symbioses, their potential has not yet been realized, largely due to legal and administrative obstacles associated with the use of waste in industrial processes and the ease of access to low-cost raw materials. After a series of international efforts, this concept, which has always been present in inter-industry relations, has been increasingly put into practice as a strategic tool for economic development, innovation, and efficient use of resources [
25].
This strategic tool requires the study of industrial circular synergies at local, national, and international levels. It is important to characterize the industrial interactions of waste and by-products in order to realize the valorization potential of each waste mass stream.
2.2.1. Industrial Symbiosis Modelling Tools
Industrial symbiosis is a promising business model that drives companies to move from linear to circular production. However, this transformation is complex, as it requires companies to rethink and redesign their production chains considering different aspects, from the involvement of new stakeholders, the introduction of waste, its impact on product development, and economic investments and resources [
26].
As a result, companies need innovative modelling tools capable of capturing, investigating, and quantifying the results of these directives and changes, and working in the strategic planning, design, implementation, and management of their industrial symbiosis networks.
In this context, a literature review was carried out to investigate the most used modelling approaches to analyse industrial symbioses and research their characteristics in terms of simulation methods, interaction mechanisms, and simulation software. The results suggest that an agent-based hybrid dynamical system approach is an appropriate method for the design and analysis of industrial symbiosis [
27].
Following this type of approach, it is important to classify each waste exposed by the agent (waste management operator, waste treatment operator, producing company, receiving company), and associate with one or more recovery operations, as a by-product or alternative raw material. Thus, in industrial symbiosis modeling tools, an integrated database for the different material flows must also be included.
Figure 1 presents a diagram of the sequential approach of an industrial symbiosis database processing and analysis methodology [
28]. The information contained in the Industrial Symbiosis databases must be analyzed.
In a first step, the existing databases must be identified to allow the compilation of previous case studies. Then, the exchanges contained in the pre-selected databases are organized according to different criteria, including the type of company that provides and receives, as well as the type and purpose of use of the waste.
Subsequently, there is a process of verifying the synergies found by evaluating the relationship between the waste, indicators and classification and characterization criteria and the recipient company.
Afterwards, errors and incomplete fields are identified and corrected in the databases selected in the first stage. Finally, the results are evaluated through exploratory and statistical analyzes [
28].
The most appropriate recovery technologies for waste are identified depending on the database, using the methodology expressed above, reported in the literature.
2.2.2. Waste Circularity Potential
Following the definition of industrial symbiosis modelling tools, it is important to evaluate waste according to its circularity potential.
To establish the situation regarding the application of the circular economy in Portugal, data on the incorporation of waste into new products were investigated. Thus, the indicators of the rate of use of circular material stand out, covered in Sustainable Production and Consumption, one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of the UN.
Compiling data from EUROSTAT, National Statistical Institutes, and other entities, resulted in a graph of the rate of use of circular material, by country, over time, shown in
Figure 2 [
29].
Over the past 13 years, the rate of use of circular material has not varied significantly. According to data from 2021, Portugal is in 24th place in the use of circular material among the countries of the European Union.
Even though there has already been a growing trend in the last decade towards waste valorization, the poor position of Portugal when compared to other European countries in terms of this metric is remarkable and encourages the improvement of the waste destination operations system.
As discussed previously, determining the most appropriate valorization operations for different types of waste entails several challenges, with the assessment of the circularity potential of each mass flow being essential to define the most adapted strategies and methodologies for the development of R&D in different areas, and future industrial application of valorization technologies.
According to data from the consultancy EY Portugal, as well as INE, a sectoral prioritization matrix was compiled relating the circularity potential and the economic potential for various economic activities and sectors, which is shown in
Figure 3 [
30].
Understanding that the exploitation of opportunities should consider the compromise between circularity and economic potential, the sectors of activity with the greatest opportunity are identified:
Basic metallurgical industries and metallic products;
Machinery manufacturing industries;
Equipment and transport material;
Construction sector;
Commerce and services sector.
In addition, other sectors stand out, namely extractive industries, food, beverage and tobacco industries, and non-metallic minerals. Further, the fashion industry (textiles, clothing, and footwear) and the chemical, pharmaceutical, rubber, and plastic industries [
30].
2.2.3. Identification of Needs and Opportunities
Industrial symbioses presuppose a business strategy between entities that collaborate in the efficient use of resources to improve their joint economic performance, with positive consequences for the natural system (sharing of infrastructure, common equipment, common services, and use of resources).
This collaboration, carried out in a network, allows the transformation of environmental problems into business opportunities, which present economic and social benefits at various levels: business, regional, and national.
Extending the life cycle of products is achieved through the process of converting waste into new materials or products. The development of new business models, dematerialization and digital transformation is demanding on several levels. The establishment of a market for the purchase and sale of waste, by-products, and alternative raw materials entails a set of technical and legal needs that must be identified.
At a legal level, it is important to clarify the role of a waste transaction platform that will act as an intermediary, providing services to traders, waste holders, and sellers according to an Organized Waste Market.
At a technical level, it is necessary to bring together all players in the sector, from planning and management entities to waste management and treatment, as well as production and transport companies. In addition, it is essential to also add technological centers that will help with the declassification of waste and its integration into the new industry. Finally, the companies that will accept the material/by-product to be reincorporated into their production cycle.
Moving from needs to opportunities, it is important to identify which factors of interest can boost the development of the market for buying and selling resources.
A 2022 study, published in the Journal of Cleaner Production, explored key drivers for improving waste-to-resource recovery, and the potential macroeconomic determinants of waste recovery across 34 OECD countries, spanning data from 1995 to 2019 [
31]. In this way, the long-term balance of waste valorization with environmental technology, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, globalization, and industrialization was analyzed. The study highlighted the positive roles of environmental technology and renewable energy consumption in improving waste-to-resource performance. Thus, technology-based factors are significant determinants of the performance of the recovery of waste into resources, implying that the implementation of modern technologies in the economy would help to increase resource efficiency and reduce environmental degradation, improving sustainable performance [
31].
In terms of opportunities, there are several benefits associated with Industrial Symbioses, highlighting the increase in the value of waste and the consequent reduction in the consumption of primary resources.
From an environmental point of view, there is an opportunity to reduce the impacts arising from the disposal of waste and the extraction and import of raw materials, namely:
Decreased consumption of raw materials;
Decreased disposal of waste in landfills;
Reduction of consumption of energy and water from the network;
Reduction of environmental impacts from a life cycle perspective;
Relief of pressure on the carrying capacity of ecosystems.
From an economic point of view, the advantages are associated with the reduction of costs with raw materials and waste treatment.
In turn, from a social point of view, the main benefits are associated with the creation of jobs in new activities necessary for the transformation of resources, but also with the ability to make greater use of labour resources in the face of lower costs for raw materials.
2.2.4. Challenges Inherent to Industrial Symbioses
Regarding the challenges inherent in industrial symbioses, over the last fifteen years, more than 130 million euros have been invested in Europe for the development of tools that enable their wide implementation [
32]. However, it appears that there is still potential for further exploration, given the barriers associated with its development.
The development of industrial symbioses, as part of a comprehensive strategy to improve resource efficiency, presupposes several barriers [
33]. These barriers materialize in the following factors:
Lack of commitment to sustainable development. There are several reasons for the lack of commitment by companies regarding sustainable development, and specifically industrial symbioses, since companies only consider the economic side, neglecting the socio-environmental dimension and long-term corporate strategy.
Lack of information sharing. Confidentiality reasons and technological problems limit the sharing of information through the network, affecting the performance of industrial symbioses.
Lack of cooperation and trust. Cooperation is key to industrial symbiosis. The resilience and robustness of the industrial symbiosis network are crucial issues for the companies that integrate it.
Technical infeasibility. Some industrial symbiosis projects require the introduction of emerging technologies to create ways to use certain wastes as raw materials.
Uncertainty in environmental legislation. Environmental and energy legislation changes quickly, and companies fear that they will not be able to recoup their investments.
Lack of community awareness.
Economic unfeasibility. Industrial symbiosis must consider economic sustainability as a driver of competitiveness, tax reduction, and resource efficiency.
One of the barriers consistently identified by companies is the difficulty of obtaining, from the public entities with responsibility in the matter, the necessary decision for a given substance to be considered a by-product. In this way, an agile communication channel must be created that allows responding effectively to the necessary criteria for substances to be considered by-products or obtain end of waste status [
34]. The existence of a market or demand should also be more flexible, insofar as purchase and sale commitments should not be necessary, but rather support market studies for the material in question [
34].
Another current challenge is the context of collective platforms for waste management. Portugal has its own legal framework for Organized Waste Markets. This table establishes rules applicable to the transactions carried out in it and the respective operators.
In addition, another challenge is the weak legal framework for industrial symbioses. Despite the relevance of industrial symbiosis in the context of sustainability and the circular economy, as well as industrial competitiveness, the concept is not referenced in the national legal framework, except for the National Waste Management Plan 2014–2020. Thus, a legal framework for industrial symbiosis should be promoted, integrating it with legislation for the territory and for the industry, guaranteeing the effectiveness of the instruments.
On the other hand, there is the challenge of the weak dynamics of cooperation in the waste sector between different intervening entities. Even though R&D and innovation play a very important role in promoting the circular economy and closing the material cycle, the waste sector in Portugal has a low intensity of expenditure on business R&D (0.6%, less than half of national average). The dynamics of cooperation between researchers, companies, universities, waste management and treatment operators, among others, will leverage the transition to a more circular economy. In this sense, more research and development should be carried out on this topic, and the dynamics of cooperation can be achieved through the establishment of markets for the purchase and sale of waste, and spaces for sharing knowledge, enhancing circular synergies.