Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Setting the strategy by defining goals and the ways to achieve them, as well as policies for the personnel acquisition, development, and control in a long-term vision of the desired state and the associated system of tactical actions. The latter are expected to ensure the best use of human resources to achieve the long-term objectives of the organization;
- Manpower planning, fed with input from continuous monitoring of the organization’s workforce requirements and anticipation of their changes;
- Recruitment and retention of human resources, taking actions to balance the demand for resources with access to a skilled workforce;
- Dismissing employees [7].
2. Theoretical View
2.1. Manpower Planning Methods
- Expert judgement. This relies on the experience-based estimates furnished by team managers. They prompt the minimal and the optimal numbers of employees in their teams and list their initial qualifications and competencies. A modification of this technique is the Delphi method, which consists of collecting opinions of a group of experts and finding staffing solutions accepted by the majority of them.
- Trend analysis. This is used to predict the future human resource demand on the basis of trends discovered in historical data. It is an assessment of changes on the internal and external labor market. Such analysis is more suitable for estimating personnel changes within teams of physical workers. It is reliable only in times of a relatively stable labor market.
- Examining and standardizing work. This technique involves the analysis of tasks and the human resources required to perform them in a particular time. It is usually used when analyzing manual labor. It is often combined with other techniques.
- Work process modelling. This involves the use of econometric techniques: operations research, statistics, and simulation to construct models of labor requirements and estimation based on econometric and statistical data.
- Indicator method. Various types of indicators are used for planning the size or structure of employment, often determined on the basis of statistical data, e.g., determining the number of production workers per one administrative employee.
2.2. Manpower Planning and the Construction Enterprise
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results and Discussion
- Collecting the input to develop a model of the company’s production plan. The data needed for simulation modeling include:
- The types of ongoing construction projects (works) modeled by means of networks;
- The intensity of the arrivals (starting subsequent projects);
- The distribution types and parameters of process execution times;
- The list of key resources (their type and demand) to deliver the processes;
- The predefined limits on the availability of resources.
- Building the simulation model of the enterprise’s production plan. To model the enterprise’s production plan, one needs to determine the types of prospective projects and the desired number of projects. For each type of project, a generic network model is prepared. For instance, the typical orders taken by one of the studied construction enterprises, specializing in housing construction in a local market, could be classified into only four project types:
- III.
- Model verification and validation. The verification of the model should be conducted at the stage of the model’s computer implementation and as the model is completed to check if the model performs according to the conceptual description. Then, the model needs to be validated, i.e., checked to what degree it describes the real system [51].
- IV.
- Simulations. Simulation studies are designed to analyze the impact of input parameters (mainly the level of resource availability and the selected resource allocation heuristic rule) on the output parameters. Performance measures of the proposed solution should be consulted by the company’s management and be in line with the company’s strategy.
- the number of projects completed within a specified period;
- the average project duration;
- the average value of the extension of time;
- the number or cost of resource transfers from project to project;
- the resource utilization rates;
- the cost of resource idle time;
- the costs of delay penalties.
- —the cost of resource transfers from project to project for the scenario ,
- —the cost of resource idle time for the scenario ,
- —the costs of delay penalties for the scenario .
- V.
- Development of a monitoring system. Due to the natural changes in the company’s environment, it is necessary to continuously monitor changes of the market and update the model in terms of the types of prospective orders and the distribution parameters of their acquisition (arrivals to the system). Updates may be needed due to changes in the enterprise’s bidding strategy or decisions to enter new market segments. It is also necessary to analyze the possibility of increasing or decreasing the production potential of the enterprise by analyzing its financial standing. These actions must be in line with the company’s strategy.
- VI.
- Implementation. The numbers of units of the key human resource, the project durations, and differences between the as-planned and simulated completion dates can prompt the management’s rationale for the levels of employment and equipment of the construction enterprise. The results of the analysis help justify the need to invest in or to reduce the production potential and introduce changes in the management system.
- VII.
- Control. In the face of organizational changes and technological advances, it may be necessary to design new network models and re-estimate the construction process durations. Keeping records of completed construction processes and analyzing the reasons for discrepancies between the actual and the as-planned completion times may be helpful in this process. It may prove necessary to modify the simulation model and to account for more constraints, e.g., to consider the correlation between durations of processes affected by the same risks or factors, such as the season of the year. At this stage, practical validation of the developed method and simulation model is carried out. The analysis of the consistency of assumptions made in the construction of the model with the real values of the data mentioned in Point I allows modification of the model and an increase in the reliability of the obtained results.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hamadamin, H.H.; Atan, T. The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices on Competitive Advantage Sustainability: The Mediation of Human Capital Development and Employee Commitment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stone, R.J.; Cox, A.; Gavin, M. Human Resource Management; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Thoman, D.; Lloyd, R. A Review of the Literature on Human Resource Development: Leveraging HR as Strategic Partner in the High Performance Organization. J. Int. Interdiscip. Bus. Res. 2018, 5, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, M.; Taylor, S. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cerezo-Narváez, A.; Bastante-Ceca, M.J.; Yagüe-Blanco, J.L. Traceability of Intra-and Interpersonal Skills: From Education to Labor Market. Hum. Cap. Competences Proj. Manag. 2018, 87–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bratton, J.; Gold, J.; Bratton, A.; Steele, L. Human Resource Management: A Critical Approach; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2022; ISBN 978-1-352-01260-6. [Google Scholar]
- Mathis, R.L.; Jackson, J.H.; Valentine, S.R.; Meglich, P. Human Resource Management; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, W.; Chang, K.; Cheng, K.-T.; Kim, K.Y. What to Do and What Works? Exploring How Work Groups Cope with Understaffing. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2019, 24, 346–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- AlAli, M.S. Staffing Level, Wages and Banks Financial Performance. Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ. 2020, 180, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
- Srebalová, M.; Vojtech, F. SME Development in the Visegrad Area. In Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives, Proceedings of the 30th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference, Lumpur, Malaysia, 8–10 January 2020; Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 269–281. [Google Scholar]
- Jankelová, N.; Jankurová, A.; Beňová, M.; Skorková, Z. Security of the Business Organizations as a Result of the Economic Crisis. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2018, 5, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kasprowicz, T. Construction Project Engineering; Institute for Terotechnology in Radom: Warsaw, Poland, 2002. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Song, J.; Martens, A.; Vanhoucke, M. Using Earned Value Management and Schedule Risk Analysis with Resource Constraints for Project Control. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 297, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pokojski, Z.; Kister, A.; Lipowski, M. Remote Work Efficiency from the Employers’ Perspective—What’s Next? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bowers, J. Identifying Critical Activities in Stochastic Resource Constrained Networks. Omega 1996, 24, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elmaghraby, S.E. On Criticality and Sensitivity in Activity Networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 127, 220–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghomi, S.F.; Ashjari, B. A Simulation Model for Multi-Project Resource Allocation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2002, 20, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Biruk, S.; Rzepecki, Ł. Simulation Model for Resource-Constrained Construction Project. Open Eng. 2019, 9, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Banobi, E.T.; Jung, W. Causes and Mitigation Strategies of Delay in Power Construction Projects: Gaps between Owners and Contractors in Successful and Unsuccessful Projects. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shi, J.J.; Halpin, D.W. Enterprise Resource Planning for Construction Business Management. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2003, 129, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- AboAbdo, S.; Aldhoiena, A.; Al-Amrib, H. Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning ERP System in a Large Construction Company in KSA. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 164, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Biruk, S.; Jaśkowski, P.; Czarnigowska, A. Modeling Contractor’s Bidding Decisions. Procedia Eng. 2017, 182, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, J.; Chan, A.; Chiang, Y.H. A Critical Review of Forecasting Models to Predict Manpower Demand. Constr. Econ. Build. 2004, 4, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Teo, P.; Gajanayake, A.; Jayasuriya, S.; Izaddoost, A.; Perera, T.; Naderpajouh, N.; Wong, P.S.P. Application of a Bottom-up Approach to Estimate Economic Impacts of Building Maintenance Projects: Cladding Rectification Program in Australia. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2021, 29, 333–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ho, P.H.K. Forecasting Construction Manpower Demand by Gray Model. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2010, 136, 1299–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, J.-J.; Chen, Z.-P.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Demartino, C. A Critical Assessment of the Compressive Behavior of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete Columns. Eng. Struct. 2018, 161, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ashiru, A.R.; Ashiru, A.L. The Sustainability of Human Resource Planning for Construction Projects. MATEC Web Conf. 2019, 258, 02018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shevchuk, O.; Matyukhina, N.; Babaieva, O.; Dudnikov, A.; Volianska, O. The Human Right to Security in the Implementationof the Concept of the “Right to Health Protection”. Jurid. Trib. J. 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, J.M.; Chan, A.P.; Chiang, Y.H. Forecasting Construction Manpower Demand: A Vector Error Correction Model. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 3030–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alaloul, W.S.; Musarat, M.A.; Rabbani, M.B.A.; Iqbal, Q.; Maqsoom, A.; Farooq, W. Construction Sector Contribution to Economic Stability: Malaysian GDP Distribution. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vereen, S.C.; Rasdorf, W.; Hummer, J.E. Application and Results of a Skilled Labor Demand Forecast Model for the US Construction Industry. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent. 2016, 5, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, L.C.; Brandenburg, S.G. Forecasting Construction Staffing for Transportation Agencies. J. Manag. Eng. 2003, 19, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chan, A.P.; Chiang, Y.H.; Mak, S.W.; Choy, L.H.; James, M.W.W. Forecasting the Demand for Construction Skills in Hong Kong. Constr. Innov. 2006, 6, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bastan, M.; Ganjavi, H.S.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Educational Demographics: A System Dynamics Model for Human Resource Management. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2020, 11, 662–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agarwal, A.L.; Rajput, B.L. Model Formulation to Estimate Manpower Demand for the Real-Estate Construction Projects in India. Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. 2013, 5, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Safarishahrbijari, A. Workforce Forecasting Models: A Systematic Review. J. Forecast. 2018, 37, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, J.M.W.; Chan, A.P.C.; Chiang, Y.H. Modeling and Forecasting Construction Labor Demand: Multivariate Analysis. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2008, 134, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gruetzemacher, R.; Paradice, D.; Lee, K.B. Forecasting Extreme Labor Displacement: A Survey of AI Practitioners. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 161, 120323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chua, D.K.H.; Shen, L.J.; Bok, S.H. Constraint-Based Planning with Integrated Production Scheduler over Internet. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2003, 129, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elsayegh, A.; El-adaway, I.H. Holistic Study and Analysis of Factors Affecting Collaborative Planning in Construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2021, 147, 04021023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sriprasert, E.; Dawood, N. Multi-Constraint Information Management and Visualisation for Collaborative Planning and Control in Construction. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2003, 8, 341–366. [Google Scholar]
- Sbiti, M.; Beddiar, K.; Beladjine, D.; Perrault, R.; Mazari, B. Toward BIM and LPS Data Integration for Lean Site Project Management: A State-of-the-Art Review and Recommendations. Buildings 2021, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Orihuela, P.; Orihuela, J.; Pacheco, S. Information and Communications Technology in Construction: A Proposal for Production Control. Procedia Eng. 2016, 164, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H. Application of Machine Learning and Rule Scheduling in a Job-Shop Production Control System. Int. J. Simul. Model. 2021, 20, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ukamaka, C.O. Implementation of Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM): A Comparative Study. Int. J. Ind. Oper. Res. 2020, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ballesteros-Pérez, P.; Larsen, G.D.; González-Cruz, M.C. Do Projects Really End Late? On the Shortcomings of the Classical Scheduling Techniques. J. Technol. Sci. Educ. 2018, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kanagasabapathi, B.; Ananthanarayanan, K.; Khosrowshahi, F. A Simulation Model for Resource Constrained Scheduling of Multiple Projects. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, London, UK, 7–9 September 2005; Khosrowshahi, F., Ed.; Volume 2, pp. 823–831. [Google Scholar]
- Biruk, S. A Computer-Based Renewable Resource Management System for a Construction Company. Open Eng. 2018, 8, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Davis, E.W.; Patterson, J.H. A Comparison of Heuristic and Optimum Solutions in Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling. Manag. Sci. 1975, 21, 944–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Demeulemeester, E.L.; Herroelen, W.; Herroelen, W.S. Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2002; ISBN 978-1-4020-7051-8. [Google Scholar]
- Law, A.M.; Kelton, W.D.; Kelton, W.D. Simulation Modeling and Analysis; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]


Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Biruk, S.; Jaśkowski, P.; Maciaszczyk, M. Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095341
Biruk S, Jaśkowski P, Maciaszczyk M. Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095341
Chicago/Turabian StyleBiruk, Sławomir, Piotr Jaśkowski, and Magdalena Maciaszczyk. 2022. "Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095341
APA StyleBiruk, S., Jaśkowski, P., & Maciaszczyk, M. (2022). Conceptual Framework of a Simulation-Based Manpower Planning Method for Construction Enterprises. Sustainability, 14(9), 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095341

