Next Article in Journal
Diversity and Governance: Is There Really Progress?
Previous Article in Journal
Green Power Trade Behavior in China’s Renewable Portfolio Standard: An Evolutionary Game-Based System Dynamics Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh

1
International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños 4031, Laguna, Philippines
2
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh
3
Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5156; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095156
Submission received: 2 March 2022 / Revised: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Rice is a major crop in Bangladesh that supports both food security and livelihoods. However, a need remains for improved productivity and adaptation to the risks associated with climate change. To accomplish this, the increased adoption of climate-resilient and high-yielding rice varieties can be beneficial. Therefore, we conducted a study in Bangladesh over three consecutive years: 2016, 2017, and 2018. The scope of the study included the major cropping season (wet), Aman. The yield advantages of climate-resilient rice varieties were evaluated and compared with those of the varieties popular with farmers. We included new stress-tolerant varieties, such as submergence-tolerant rice (BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan52) and drought-tolerant rice (BRRI dhan56 and BRRI dhan71), along with farmer-chosen controls, in the study. We conducted the evaluation through on-farm trials to compare the varieties in both submergence- and drought-affected environments. The seasonal trials provided measured results of yield advantages. The participating farmers were also studied over the three-year-period to capture their varietal adoption rates. We calculated both the location estimated yield advantages (LEYA) and the location observed yield advantages (LOYA). The results revealed that, under non-stress conditions, the grain yields of climate-resilient varieties were either statistically similar to or higher than those of the farmer-chosen controls. Our study also revealed a year-to-year progressive adoption rate for the introduced varieties. The study suggests that the wide-scale introduction and popularization of climate-resilient varieties can ensure higher productivity and climate risk adaptation. The close similarity between LOYA and LEYA indicated that the observational and experiential conclusions of the host farmers were similar to the scientific performance of the varieties. We also found that comparison performed through on-farm trials was a critical method for enhancing experiential learning and obtaining an accurate estimation of yield advantages.

1. Introduction

Agriculture plays an important role in securing livelihoods and boosting the economic progress of a nation. The agricultural sector accounts for 19.3% of Bangladesh’s GDP and is a major source of employment. Furthermore, 13.4% of this 19.3% is derived from crop production, and rice alone contributes to 46% of the total [1]. The significance of rice in Bangladesh is evident because it accounts for 91% of the total food grain production. It is a staple food for more than 99% of the population. Per capita consumption of rice is 416 g per person per day [2]. Thus, rice is at the center of the food security–environment–sustainability web in Bangladesh. This holds true for South Asia as well [3,4]. Rice covers 76% of the total crop area, of which 84.7% is cultivated with modern varieties and the remaining 15.3% with local traditional varieties [5]. Currently, rice is grown on 11.4 million hectare (ha) of land and its production is close to 34.4 million metric tons (MT) [6]. However, by 2030, the population is expected to reach 189.9 million and feeding a population of that size would require an estimated 42.5 million MT of paddy, which is equivalent to 28 million MT of milled rice [6].
Considering the current trend and projected food demand, there is a need to increase the production of major food crops significantly, especially in the regions facing severe environmental stresses [7]. Over time, compared to other food crops, rice production faces progressive limitations because of various environmental challenges. In Asia, more than 30% of the 700 million households belonging to low-income groups are located in rainfed lowlands that are being affected by environmental stressors [8], making them more vulnerable to the associated risks of food and livelihood insecurity. Among the most significant limitations on rice production are the frequent flooding in regions with high rainfall and the inundation of fields from nearby bodies of water. Statistically, at least 16% of rice production around the globe is affected by frequent submergence caused by flash floods [9,10]. In addition, it is believed that, as a long-term aftereffect of climate change (including global warming), incidences of flooding will increase, which will pose a significant threat to the sustainability of rice productivity in the future [11]. Current concerns such as sea-level rise indicate a likely increase in occurrences and intensities of extreme climatic events. Moreover, the uneven distribution of rainfall is expected to increase the frequency of flooding in several regions [12]. The rainfed tropics, where food insecurity and poverty are on the higher side, are expected to witness the most significant consequences [13,14]. Although rice is known for its physiological capacity to grow in flooded conditions, submergence for more than a week has been found to negatively affect the yield of several rice varieties [15,16].
Abiotic stresses such as droughts and floods significantly constrain rice production in Bangladesh [17]. One of the most significant recurring challenges to rice productivity in the rainfed lowlands of Southeast and South Asia is flash floods that lead to the submergence of plants for more than ten days [18]. In Bangladesh, major setbacks to the realization of potential yield are abiotic stresses such as flooding (50%), drought (20%), and salinity (30%) [19]. Drought occurs mainly due to low and erratic rainfall. The north-western part of Bangladesh is considered a drought-prone area. Approximately 5.7 million ha of rice are grown under rainfed conditions that cause substantial yield decreases. Drought affects rice crops in more than one growth stage, for example, in the post-transplantation and establishment stages (early-phase drought) or in transplanted Aman (T. Aman: rainfed lowland rice), in which the crop is affected in the reproductive stage (terminal drought), resulting in considerable yield loss. Upland rice (Aus) also suffers from drought as the crop is direct-seeded and grown under rainfed conditions [19]. Bangladesh, the seventh-most-affected country by extreme weather events, saw 191 such occurrences from 1999 to 2018 [20]. According to government assessments in 2017, about 16,000 ha of farmland were fully lost and 560,000 ha of standing crops were partially damaged. Although data based on a comprehensive evaluation of the August 2017 flood-affected food crops are unavailable, Aman rice in low-lying areas was probably the most affected [5,21]. In addition to drought, Bangladesh has the largest rainfed crop ecosystem; it too is prone to submergence [22,23]. Farmers in Bangladesh cultivate varieties such as BR10, BR11, and Swarna that have duration greater than 145 days as well as shorter duration varieties (<135 days) such as Binadhan-7, BRRI dhan39, and BRRI dhan49. These varieties are preferred because of their suitability, availability, high market value, high yield, and desired grain quality. Cultivars that are susceptible to drought and submergence suffer yield loss due to recurring climatic hazards every year [24]. With the recent innovations achieved through research in plant breeding, several climate-resilient varieties are available that can withstand climatic shocks and enable farmers to harvest a reasonable economic yield compared with conventional susceptible cultivars. Even though older varieties are capable of resisting floods to some extent, they are characterized by inferior grain quality and lower yields. Additionally, in a few regions, farmers have abandoned rice cultivation, leaving their lands fallow during the rainy season [25]. To offset the impact of submergence, the introduction of genes for submergence tolerance into high-yielding cultivars has proven to be the most impactful solution [26]. Since these flood and drought spells occur every year, a variety should possess the basic trait of climatic resiliency in addition to other agronomic qualities, including yield.
In past studies on climate-ready crops, different outcomes showed positive, negative, and even indifferent impacts of various genes integrated into different crop species [26,27,28]. However, a good understanding of the powerful influence of the submergence-tolerant quantitative trait locus (QTL) named Sub1 on yield, as well as yield-related metrics in farmers’ fields with no stress, is not available. Through head-to-head trials, we assessed the effects of the Sub1 QTL integrated into various genetic backgrounds, such as BRRI dhan52 (BR11-Sub1) and BRRI dhan51 (Swarna-Sub1), on rice grain yield under non-submergence conditions in different locations over the years. Our study also evaluated drought-resilient varieties such as BRRI dhan71 and BRRI dhan56 and compared them with Binadhan-7 and BRRI dhan39 in 2018. As a unique on-farm trial method in farmers’ fields, head-to-head trials were used, which allowed growers to compare submergence and drought-tolerant varieties cultivated side by side with popular cultivars of farmers’ choice under their own crop management practices.

Study Objectives

i.
To assess the yield gain of submergence- and drought-resilient varieties over traditionally grown varieties through on-farm trials.
ii.
To understand adoption and dissemination rates of tested/introduced varieties in the concerned villages and communities.

2. Materials and Methods

Our study was conducted across three districts (Sylhet, Chapai Nawabganj, and Panchagarh) in Bangladesh during the Aman seasons of 2016 and 2017. In 2018, a total of six districts were covered for the study, each defined with a specific code name: E1 (Sylhet), E2 (Cox’s Bazar), E3 (Chapai Nawabganj), E4 (Thakurgaon), E5 (Panchagarh), and E6 (Natore) (Figure 1). These regions represent different agro-ecological zones (AEZs) of Bangladesh (Table 1). The experimental materials consisted of some popular varieties of rice with traits of submergence tolerance (with Sub1) and drought tolerance.
In order to measure the yield advantage of new varieties over the farmer-chosen varieties, on-farm trials were established. These on-farm trials are multi-locational strip trials, in which the test varieties are grown alongside the farmer-chosen varieties in a side-by-side manner. Farmer-chosen management practices are followed for the trial sites. This provides a realistic estimation of absolute yield as well as yield advantage (or disadvantage) of a new variety under a particular ecosystem. When all the factors of crop production are kept constant, the yield advantage shown by a variety is considered to be solely expressed because of its genetic composition.
This method generates evidence on whether to promote a variety or not. The sites selected for our study were located in the regions prone to abiotic stress. The selection of farmers for the trials was accomplished through different partners from the national agricultural research and extension system, representing diverse AEZs. We compared the yield and yield-contributing characteristics of introduced and farmer-chosen varieties extensively. In addition to scientific measurement of yield and related parameters, we assessed varietal adoption through rapid and participatory rural appraisals (PRAs) using focus group discussions (FGDs) and field days. PRAs were organized in the participating villages in the subsequent year of varietal introduction in order to measure adoption. We measured the speed of varietal dissemination by calculating the seed dissemination ratio for three consecutive years:
Dissemination ratio = [(A) − (B)]/(A)]
where A = number of farmers who had taken seeds from original trial farmers and had cultivated the variety and B = number of farmers who participated in the original trials.
Four farmer-chosen popular cultivars, BRRI dhan39, BR11, Binadhan-7, and Swarna, alongside submergence-tolerant varieties BRRI dhan52 (BR11-Sub1) and BRRI dhan51 (Swarna-Sub1), as well as the new drought-tolerant cultivars BRRI dhan56 and BRRI dhan71 were considered for the study (Appendix A). These varieties were developed by two premier institutes, the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) and Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA). During the on-farm trials, two varieties representing near isogenic lines (NILs) were evaluated and compared. Purposefully, the study was conducted at sites that are prone to flood to evaluate the possible positive or negative effects of the Sub1 QTL. However, most of the trials did not experience significant abiotic stress. This gave us the opportunity to evaluate the performance of varieties even under non-stress conditions.

Statistical Analysis

We calculated the yield advantage and expressed it as the percentage change in yield of the new cultivar over its farmer-chosen/popular check variety in a particular environment. The location observed yield advantage (LOYA) and location estimated yield advantage (LEYA) from the mean location of the farmer variety were calculated using the following equation:
Location observed yield advantage (%) = [(Z − Y)/Y] × 100
where Z = test/new variety and Y = farmer-chosen variety.
Location estimated yield advantage (%) = [(Z − YL)/YL] × 100
where Z = test/new variety and YL = all-location mean of farmer-chosen variety.
We assessed the varietal adoption percentages by evaluating farmers’ qualitative responses in the subsequent year after varietal introduction. The farmers in the participating villages took part in a series of FGDs and field days. The responses were recorded from the total farmers present on the day of the PRA.
Adoption (%) = [(P/TP)] × 100
where P = number of farmer participants who had cultivated the new varieties in the subsequent year and TP = total number of farmer participants in the PRA.
To determine the statistical significance of the deviation, we computed Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) [29] using IBM SPSS 16 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Comparison of Grain Yield of BRRI dhan52 and BR11

In all of the trials conducted in E1 (Sylhet) and E2 (Cox’s Bazar), BRRI dhan52 (Sub1 version of BR11) produced statistically higher grain yield than the farmer-chosen variety BR11, as shown in Figure 2 and Table 2. For BRRI dhan52, the observed average yields were 4.47 t ha−1 and 5.40 t ha−1 in Sylhet and Cox’s Bazar, respectively, which were higher than the 3.72 t ha−1 and 4.90 t ha−1 recorded for BR11 at the respective locations. LOYA and LEYA for BRRI dhan52 were 49.42% and 11.11% in Sylhet and Cox’s Bazar, respectively (Figure 3).
The adoption rates of BRRI dhan52 in the areas of Gowainghat and Kanaighat of Sylhet during the three consecutive years (2017 to 2019) were 22%, 28%, and 38% and 17%, 24%, and 44%, respectively (Table 3). During the same period, the seed dissemination ratios were 5, 6, and 8 and 3, 5, and 1 in Gowainghat and Kanaighat, respectively (Figure 4).
The boxplots (Figure 5) indicate a narrow distribution base for the varietal yield. However, there were many outliers, as evident in Figure 5. This is because several trials in the Gowainghat region of Sylhet faced certain amounts of abiotic stress. Under those levels of stress, the farmer-chosen varieties failed to maintain yield stability and the yields observed were close to zero. For BRRI dhan52, as shown in the boxplots (Figure 5), average yield in Cox’s Bazar was higher than in Sylhet. The median was higher for Cox’s Bazar as well as the lower quartile (Q1) being greater than the upper quartile (Q3) of Sylhet.

3.2. Comparison of Grain Yield of BRRI dhan51 (Swarna-Sub1) and Swarna

During the wet seasons of 2016 and 2018, we observed that BRR1 dhan51 (Sub1 version of Swarna) had higher grain yield than Swarna in Chapai Nawabganj. Thirty trials were conducted in this environment (E3). Although the results for maturity were statistically similar, BRRI dhan51 significantly outyielded Swarna (Figure 6). During the wet season of 2018, BRRI dhan51 yielded 5.33 t ha−1, whereas Swarna recorded a yield of 4.67 t ha−1. In the same year, LOYA and LEYA of BRRI dhan51 were 14.91% and 14.12%, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 4). Thus, it was evident that the yield of BRRI dhan51 was significantly higher than that of Swarna under non-submergence (non-stress) conditions.
The adoption rates of BRRI dhan51 during the period of 2017 to 2019 were 22%, 29%, and 29% in Sadar and 15%, 27%, and 53% in Gomastapur locations of Chapai Nawabganj (Table 3). During that period, the seed dissemination ratios were 4, 6, and 6 in Sadar and 3, 6, and 8 in Gomastapur (Figure 3).

3.3. Comparison of Grain Yield of BRRI dhan56 with That of Binadhan-7 and BRRI dhan39

In 2018, the trials conducted in Natore, Thakurgaon, and Panchagarh districts showed that BRRI dhan56 had significantly higher grain yield than the check varieties. To compare BRRI dhan56 and Binadhan-7, trials were carried out with 15 farmers in two locations (Panchagarh and Thakurgaon). The observed grain yields of BRRI dhan56 were 3.66 t ha−1 and 4.19 t ha−1, whereas Binadhan-7 yielded 3.44 t ha−1 and 3.57 t ha−1 in Panchagarh and Thakurgaon, respectively (Table 2). BRRI dhan56 outyielded Binadhan-7 in both locations (Table 2). In 2018, the LOYA values of BRRI dhan56 were 6.56% and 17.67% in Panchagarh and Thakurgaon, respectively, which were close to the respective LEYA values of 6.38% and 17.34% (Table 2).
The yields of BRRI dhan56 and BRRI dhan39 were compared with those of 10 farmers from Natore district. The yield of BRRI dhan56 (5.55 t ha−1) was higher than that of BRRI dhan39 (5.37 t ha−1). A similar outcome was observed for the LOYA and LEYA of BRRI dhan56 in Natore-1, with values of 3.35% and 3.37%, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 4). The boxplots (Figure 5) indicate that the yield distribution was normal for Thakurgaon, negatively skewed (moderately) for Panchagarh, and positively skewed (extremely) for Natore-1. Hence, yield variability was less to moderate in Panchagarh and Thakurgoan but quite high in Natore district.

3.4. Comparison of Grain Yield of BRRI dhan71 and Binadhan-7

BRRI dhan71 showed significantly higher yield than Binadhan-7 in every on-farm trial being conducted (Table 2). During the wet season of 2018, grain yields of BRRI dhan71 and Binadhan-7 were recorded as 5.48 t ha−1 and 5.31 t ha−1, respectively. In addition, during the same period, LOYA and LEYA values for BRRI dhan71 were calculated to be 3.30% and 3.20%, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 4). Therefore, BRRI dhan71 performed better in terms of yield as evident with the gain over its counterpart cultivar Binadhan-7. The boxplot (Figure 5) shows a highly negative yield distribution for BRRI dhan71, which implies high variability in yield in the test area.
The adoption rates of BRRI dhan71 during the three consecutive years (2017 to 2019) were 56%, 71%, and 94% in Boda; 64%, 79%, and 96% in Sadar; and 54%, 75%, and 95% in Atwari of Panchagarh district (Table 3). During that period, the seed dissemination ratios were 14, 16, and 22 in Boda; 15, 17, and 22 in Sadar; and 12, 17, and 21 in Atwari (Figure 3).

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

This study had two major objectives. The first was to evaluate the yield advantages (or disadvantages) for the introduced climate-resilient varieties against the farmer-grown varieties under farmer management practices. The second objective was to understand the informal dissemination and adoption rates for the new varieties in the regions where they were introduced. The study has clearly demonstrated the yield superiority of some of the new submergence and drought-tolerant varieties vis-à-vis the farmer-chosen varieties, even under non-stress conditions. A similar study conducted in India through a randomized control trial in 2012 and 2013 had included one drought-tolerant variety, Sahabhagi Dhan. That study had affirmed as high as a 1.3 t ha−1 yield loss happening under severe drought. However, that study was not able to generate enough evidence for the yield advantage of the drought-tolerant variety [30]. Our study has been able to generate substantial evidence for multiple new drought-tolerant varieties developed in Bangladesh. Our study demonstrated the overall yield advantages of drought-tolerant varieties BRRI dhan56 and BRRI dhan71. Similar trends observed across LOYA and LEYA values also affirm these results. The average LOYA value of BRRI dhan56 was 6.56% and 17.67% in Panchagarh and Thakurgaon, respectively, which was close to the respective LEYA values of 6.38% and 17.34%. The LOYA and LEYA values of BRRI dhan56 in Natore-1 were 3.35% and 3.37%. The LOYA and LEYA values for BRRI dhan71 were 3.30% and 3.20%, respectively (Table 2 and Figure 4).
A previous study conducted on flood-tolerant rice variety Swarna-Sub1 in India showed that the variety decreases yield variability and provides yield advantages under flooding and no yield penalty under non-flood conditions [23]. Our current study has further included two new Sub1 varieties, BRRI dhan51 and BRRI dhan52. In addition, our study suggests the yield superiority of both drought- and flood-tolerant germplasm even under non-stress conditions. The average yield advantages of BRRI dhan56, BRRI dhan71, BRRI dhan51, and BRRI dhan52 were 4.87%, 3.20%, 14.12%, and 10.21%, respectively (Table 2). The tolerant varieties with Sub1 could survive complete submergence, in contrast with farmer varieties, and this can be attributed to the minimum shoot elongation of tolerant varieties underwater to reserve energy resources for maintenance of metabolism and for use during the recovery phase after the water recedes [15,31].
These newly developed varieties also strongly indicate the impact of breeding programs led by institutions such as BRRI and BINA being able to provide climate-resilient rice varieties with high genetic gain potential. One of the major arguments regarding the limited acceptance of climate-resilient varieties in various countries has been their inability to compete with farmer-chosen varieties under non-stress conditions and failing to considerably influence adoption behavior. However, superior germplasm providing assured and visible yield advantages has tremendous potential to change the scenario of varietal replacement.
Our study also established the higher adoption potential of the new resilient varieties. The new varieties were also significantly disseminated and adopted in the subsequent years after their introduction through on-farm trials. This can be credited to the superior performance of the varieties but also indicate how the learnings and awareness have not been limited to only the host farmers who participated in the on-farm trials. The multiple PRA events organized in the same villages affirmed the rapid dissemination of farm-saved seeds through a community network and adoption of the varieties by neighbor farmers. The adoption rate varied from 15% to 96%, with the average adoption rate of BRRI dhan51, BRRI dhan52, and BRRI dhan71 being 29.13%, 28.83%, and 76%, respectively.
Since the adoption rate in our study was also highly satisfactory within the participating villages, it is recommended to promote these varieties on a large scale with assured availability and supply of good-quality labeled seeds through public and private extension and delivery networks.
The adoption of stress-tolerant versions of popular rice cultivars can enable farming communities to mitigate the current and future challenges of recurrent flooding and drought in Bangladesh. This remains critical to maintain and increase the rice production rate of the country to match the demand of the growing population. Therefore, it is imperative to appropriately position these climate-resilient or stress-tolerant varieties against the popular non-stress-tolerant varieties. This also calls for targeted public-private-community partnerships in seed systems to accelerate the supply of early-generation as well as commercial and good-quality seed for faster varietal turnover.

Author Contributions

S.N.—Programme lead, Conceptualisation, Budget allocation, Methodology development, Manuscript writing, Manuscirpt editing, Journal communication; M.A.H.—Methodology development, Field data collection, Manuscript writing, Manuscirpt editing, Data analysis; K.D.—Manuscript writing, Manuscirpt editing, Journal communication; S.I.—Field data coordination and collection, Manuscirpt editing; S.M.H.—Manuscirpt editing; B.K.—Manuscirpt editing, Field data coordination; R.F.N.—Data verification, Data analysis; S.B.—Manuscirpt editing, Conceptualisation; H.B.—Manuscript editing; S.S.—Programme lead, Conceptualization, Budget allocation; M.R.I.—Methodology development, Manuscirpt editing, Literature review; V.K.S.—Manuscirpt editing, Literature review; A.K.—Manuscirpt editing, Language editing; U.S.S.—Manuscirpt editing, Literature review, Programme lead; L.H.—Programme lead, Field data coordination. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union as part of the European Commission’s support to AR4D and was administered by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), with grant number IRRI 2000000983. The article processing charge is funded by the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data, analysis file are available with authors and can be provided upon request.

Acknowledgments

This research is a result of support from various converging research programs and extended efforts over the years in Bangladesh. The original research/intervention in the highlighted region was supported through European Union collaboration with funds administered by the IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development) through the PRUNSAR-EC (Improved crop management and strengthened seed supply system for drought-prone rainfed lowlands in South Asia) project. Several of the climate-resilient varieties developed and used in the study were the result of STRASA (Stress Tolerant Rice for Africa and South Asia), funded by BMGF (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), through leading research institutes BRRI and BINA. The research effort based on its initial success has been showing enhanced outreach. It is being scaled through several other initiatives to maintain the momentum and expand it to newer geographies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Physiological Characteristics of the Varieties (Test Varieties and Farmer Checks) Used in This Study.
Table A1. Physiological Characteristics of the Varieties (Test Varieties and Farmer Checks) Used in This Study.
Name of VarietyPhysiological Characteristics
Maturity (days)Plant Height (cm)1000-Grain wt. (g)Yield Potential (t ha−1)Grain TypeAbiotic Stress Tolerance Feature
BRRI dhan71114–117107–10824.05.5Medium slender & boldTolerates up to 21–28 days without rainfall at reproductive stage
BRRI dhan56105–11011523.64.5–5.0Long boldAble to tolerate 10–12 days without rainfall at reproductive stage
BRRI dhan52140–145 (normal conditions)
155–160 (14 days’ submergence)
11627.04.5–5.0 (normal conditions)
4.0–4.5 (10–12 days’ submergence)
Medium boldAble to tolerate up to 10–12 days of fully submerged conditions
BRRI dhan51140–145 (normal conditions)
155–160 (14 days’ submergence)
9020.44.5–5.0 (normal conditions)
4.0–4.5 (10–15 days’ submergence)
Medium slender and crystal whiteAble to tolerate up to 10–15 days of fully submerged conditions
BRRI dhan3912010620.44.5Long slenderNA
BR1114511525.75.5Medium boldNA
Binadhan-7115–1209524.94.5–5.0Medium slenderNA
Swarna140–1459521.04.0–4.5Medium slenderNA
Available online: www.brri.gov.bd (accessed on 23 March 2022).

References

  1. Roy, R. Modelling and Policy Integration of Sustainable Rice Farming Systems in Bangladesh. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. HIES (Household Income and Expenditure Survey); Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Government of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2010.
  3. Mottaleb, K.A.; Gumma, M.K.; Mishra, A.K.; Mohanty, S. Quantifying production losses due to drought and submergence of rainfed rice at the household level using remotely sensed MODIS data. Agric. Syst. 2015, 137, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, S.; Kumar, S.; Mishra, A.; Singh, N.K.; Mathew, S. Trade and Knowledge Sharing in HYV Rice Seeds: Scope for Cooperation between Bangladesh and India (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2603729); Social Science Research Network: Rochester, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rahman, N.M.F.; Hasan, M.M.; Hossain, M.I.; Baten, M.A.; Hosen, S.; Ali, M.A.; Kabir, M.S. Forecasting Aus Rice Area and Production in Bangladesh using Box-Jenkins Approach. Bangladesh Rice J. 2016, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. BBS. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh; Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Government of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2012.
  7. Bailey-Serres, J. Submergence tolerant rice: SUB1’s journey from landrace to modern cultivar. Rice 2010, 3, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. IRRI. Background Paper: The Rice Crisis: What Needs to Be Done? International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, Philippines, 2008; 12p, Available online: www.irri.org (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  9. Koppa, N.; Amarnath, G. Geospatial Assessment of Flood-Tolerant Rice Varieties to Guide Climate Adaptation Strategies in India. Climate 2021, 9, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dar, M.H.; Zaidi, N.W.; Waza, S.A.; Verulkar, S.B.; Ahmed, T.; Singh, P.K.; Iftekharuddaula, K.M. No yield penalty under favorable conditions paving the way for successful adoption of flood tolerant rice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Wassmann, R.; Jagadish, S.V.K.; Sumfleth, K.; Pathak, H.; Howell, G.; Ismail, A.; Serraj, R.; Redona, E.; Singh, R.K.; Heuer, S. Regional Vulnerability of Climate Change Impacts on Asian Rice Production and Scope for Adaptation. Adv. Agron. 2009, 102, 91–133. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pendergrass, A.G.; Knutti, R. The Uneven Nature of Daily Precipitation and Its Change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 11980–11988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coumou, D.; Rahmstorf, S. A decade of weather extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mackill, D.J.; Ismail, A.M.; Singh, U.S.; Labios, R.V.; Paris, T.R. Development and rapid adoption of submergence tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties. Adv. Agron. 2012, 115, 303–356. [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh, S.; Mackill, D.J.; Ismail, A.M. Physiological Basis of Tolerance to Complete Submergence in Rice Involves Genetic Factors in Addition to the SUB1 Gene. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Adkins, S.W.; Shiraishi, T.; McComb, J.A. Submergence tolerance of rice- a new glasshouse method for the experimental submergence of plants. Physiol. Plant. 1990, 80, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mishra, A.K.; Mottaleb, K.; Khanal, A.; Mohanty, S. Abiotic stress and its impact on production efficiency: The case of rice farming in Bangladesh. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 199, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Septiningsih, E.M.; Pamplona, A.M.; Sanchez, D.L.; Neeraja, C.N.; Vergara, G.V.; Heuer, S.; Ismail, A.M.; Mackill, D.J. Development of submergence tolerant rice cultivars: The Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Biswas, J.K. Growing Rice under Stress Environment. The Daily Star. 2015. Available online: www.thedailystar.net/growing-rice-under-stress-environment-15447 (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  20. Eckstein, D.; Künzel, V.; Schäfer, L.; Winges, M. Global Climate Risk Index 2020. Germanwatch Retrieved 31 July 2020. 2019. Available online: https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/20-2-01e%20Global (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  21. FAO; GIEWS Update Bangladesh. Severe Floods in 2017 Affected Large Numbers of People and Caused Damage to the Agricultural Sector; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017; Available online: www.fao.org/3/i7876e/i7876e.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  22. Dar, M.H.; Singh, S.; Singh, U.S.; Ismail, A.M. Stress tolerant rice varieties: Making headway in India. SATSA Mukhapatra Ann. Tech. 2014, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dar, M.H.; Chakravorty, R.; Waza, S.A.; Sharma, M.; Zaidi, N.W.; Singh, A.N.; Singh, U.S.; Ismail, A.M. Transforming rice cultivation in flood prone coastal Odisha to ensure food and economic security. Food Sec. 2017, 9, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Dar, M.H.; de Janvry, A.; Emerick, K.; Raitzer, D.; Sadoulet, E. Flood-tolerant rice reduces yield variability and raises expected yield, differentially benefitting socially disadvantaged groups. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ismail, A.M.; Singh, U.S.; Singh, S.; Dar, M.H.; Mackill, D.J. The contribution of submergence tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties to food security in flood-prone rainfed lowland areas in Asia. Field Crops Res. 2013, 152, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, U.S.; Dar, M.H.; Singh, S.; Zaidi, N.W.; Bari, M.A.; Mackill, D.J.; Collard, B.C.; Singh, V.N.; Singh, J.P.; Reddy, J.N.; et al. performance, dissemination, impact and tracking of submergence tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties in South Asia. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 2013, 45, 112–131. [Google Scholar]
  27. Brown, J.K.M. Yield penalties of disease resistance in crops. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Johnston, P.A.; Meiyalaghan, V.; Forbes, M.E.; Habekuß, A.; Butler, R.; Pickering, R. Marker assisted separation of resistance genes Rph22 and Rym16Hb from an associated yield penalty in a barley: Hordeum bulbosum introgression line. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 1137–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salkind, N.J. Encyclopedia of Research Design (Vols. 1-0); SAGE Publications, Inc.: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamano, T.; Dar, M.H.; Architesh, P.; Ishika, G.; Malabayabas, M.L.; Kelly, E. Impact and Adoption of Risk-Reducing Drought-Tolerant Rice in India. Impact Evaluation Report, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. 2018. Available online: https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/IE72-India-drought-tolerant_0.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  31. Setter, T.L.; Ellis, M.; Laureles, E.V.; Ella, E.S.; Senadhira, D.; Mishra, S.B.; Sarkarung, S.; Datta, S. Physiology and genetics of submergence tolerance in rice. Ann. Bot. 1997, 79, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study areas in Bangladesh.
Figure 1. Study areas in Bangladesh.
Sustainability 14 05156 g001
Figure 2. Comparisons of grain yields (t ha−1) of BRRI dhan52 (BR11-Sub1) and BR11 evaluated during the wet seasons of 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Figure 2. Comparisons of grain yields (t ha−1) of BRRI dhan52 (BR11-Sub1) and BR11 evaluated during the wet seasons of 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Sustainability 14 05156 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of LOYA and LEYA of new rice varieties over existing ones at different locations.
Figure 3. Comparison of LOYA and LEYA of new rice varieties over existing ones at different locations.
Sustainability 14 05156 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of seed dissemination ratio during three years (2017, 2018, and 2019).
Figure 4. Comparison of seed dissemination ratio during three years (2017, 2018, and 2019).
Sustainability 14 05156 g004
Figure 5. BRRI dhan51, BRRI dhan52, BRRI dhan56, and BRRI dhan71 yield range (t ha−1), deviation, and prediction in a trial in Chapai Nawabganj, Cox’s Bazar, Natore, Sylhet, and Thakurgaon districts.
Figure 5. BRRI dhan51, BRRI dhan52, BRRI dhan56, and BRRI dhan71 yield range (t ha−1), deviation, and prediction in a trial in Chapai Nawabganj, Cox’s Bazar, Natore, Sylhet, and Thakurgaon districts.
Sustainability 14 05156 g005
Figure 6. Comparisons of grain yields (t ha−1) of BRRI dhan51 and Swarna evaluated during the wet seasons of 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Figure 6. Comparisons of grain yields (t ha−1) of BRRI dhan51 and Swarna evaluated during the wet seasons of 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Sustainability 14 05156 g006
Table 1. Description of selected study sites (districts), AEZs, and the predominant climatic parmeters.
Table 1. Description of selected study sites (districts), AEZs, and the predominant climatic parmeters.
Name of DistrictEnvironment CodeAEZ (Agro-Ecological Zone)Climatic Parameters
Temperature (°C)Rainfall (mm)Humidity (%)
Min.Max.AverageAverage
SylhetE1Eastern Surma-Kushiyara Floodplain20.831.5158.767.9
Cox’s BazarE2Chittagong Coastal Plains22.031.1142.771.0
Northern and Eastern Hill
Chapai NawabganjE3High Ganges River Floodplain16.730.7120.780.0
High Barind Tract
ThakurgaonE4Old Himalayan Piedmont Plain21.931.5148.665.1
PanchagarhE5Old Himalayan Piedmont Plain22.932.9155.067.9
NatoreE6High Ganges River Floodplain23.633.497.760.8
Source: Available online: http://www.bmd.gov.bd (accessed on 23 March 2022).
Table 2. Parametric comparisons of new and existing rice varieties in evaluated trials during the wet season of 2018 in Bangladesh.
Table 2. Parametric comparisons of new and existing rice varieties in evaluated trials during the wet season of 2018 in Bangladesh.
LocationEnvironmentNo. of TrialsVariety
Name
Maturity Observed Yield (t ha−1)LOYA
(%)
LEYA
(%)
SylhetE158BRRI dhan52132.60 b4.47 a49.4220.25
BR11134.78 a3.72 b
Cox’s BazarE223BRRI dhan52132.00 b5.40 a11.1110.21
BR11134.04 a4.90 b
Chapai NawabganjE330BRRI dhan51135.90 a5.33 a14.9314.12
Swarna135.83 a4.67 b
ThakurgaonE415BRRI dhan5694.80 b4.19 a17.6717.34
Binadhan-7102.47 a3.57 b
PanchagarhE515BRRI dhan5697.27 b3.66 a6.566.38
Binadhan-7100.87 a3.44 b
Natore-1E610BRRI dhan56105.30 b5.55 a3.373.35
BRRI dhan39109.10 a5.37 b
Natore-210BRRI dhan71115.20 a5.48 a3.303.20
Binadhan-7104.60 b5.31 b
a, b letters correspond to least significance of means for a specific parameter.
Table 3. Adoption rate (%) during 2017, 2018, and 2019 of BRRI dhan51, BRRI dhan52, and BRRI dhan71.
Table 3. Adoption rate (%) during 2017, 2018, and 2019 of BRRI dhan51, BRRI dhan52, and BRRI dhan71.
LocationVariety
Name
Introduction YearNumber of TrialsTotal Participants Attending PRAParticipants in PRA Who Had Actually Cultivated the VarietyAdoption YearAdoption Rate
(%)
Gowainghat, SylhetBRRI dhan5220161025055201722
201720500139201828
2018401,000377201938
Kanaighat, Sylhet2016512521201717
20171025059201824
201818500218201944
Sadar, Chapai NawabganjBRRI dhan512016512527201722
20171025073201829
201815375110201929
Gomastapur, Chapai Nawabganj2016512519201715
20171025067201827
201815375197201953
Boda, PanchagarhBRRI dhan71201625028201756
201737553201871
20185125117201994
Sadar, Panchagarh201625032201764
201737559201879
20185125120201996
Atwari, Panchagarh201625027201754
201737556201875
20185125119201995
Total BRRI dhan51 adoption % 29.17
Total BRRI dhan52 adoption % 28.83
Total BRRI dhan71 adoption % 76.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nayak, S.; Habib, M.A.; Das, K.; Islam, S.; Hossain, S.M.; Karmakar, B.; Fritsche Neto, R.; Bhosale, S.; Bhardwaj, H.; Singh, S.; et al. Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095156

AMA Style

Nayak S, Habib MA, Das K, Islam S, Hossain SM, Karmakar B, Fritsche Neto R, Bhosale S, Bhardwaj H, Singh S, et al. Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nayak, Swati, Muhammad Ashraful Habib, Kuntal Das, Saidul Islam, Sk Mosharaf Hossain, Biswajit Karmakar, Roberto Fritsche Neto, Sankalp Bhosale, Hans Bhardwaj, Sudhanshu Singh, and et al. 2022. "Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095156

APA Style

Nayak, S., Habib, M. A., Das, K., Islam, S., Hossain, S. M., Karmakar, B., Fritsche Neto, R., Bhosale, S., Bhardwaj, H., Singh, S., Islam, M. R., Singh, V. K., Kohli, A., Singh, U. S., & Hassan, L. (2022). Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 14(9), 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095156

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop