Exploiting Marketing Methods for Increasing Participation and Engagement in Sustainable Mobility Planning
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Has originality and interesting findings. The manuscript uses appropriate language and styles and all figures and illustrations are acceptable for publication.
Would be interesting to indicate suitable Mrt methods for different focal groups and hard-to-reach groups, as well as Mrt methods for different phases in mobility planning (i.e. measure planning VS scenario building etc. )
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The top of this manuscript is interesting and is within the scope of the journal. But there are some issues in present form should be revised:
1. The novelty and research objective should be clearly clarified;
2. The Abstract and Introduction give much background information, but miss the key information for present study;
3. The results are poorly presented, this is the main weakness of present form, so it is must to provide much more and concrete results to support the research novelty;
4. For the participation, is there any index or criteria to measure?
5. Sustainable mobility planning involve many different kinds of objects, is this study on one, or some, or general objects?
6. For the marketing method, is it proposed by authors or apply existing ones?
7. The text size in figures are inproper, some is too big and some is to small to read.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have improved the manuscript according to the comments. It is recommended to publish.
