Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Smart Co-Operative Concept
2.1.1. The Smart Member
2.1.2. The Smart Economy Concept
2.1.3. The Smart Governance Concept
2.2. Business Model and Business Process Management (BPM)
2.3. Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT) Business Model
2.4. Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL)
2.5. Proposed Framework
3. Methodology
3.1. Evidence-Based Review
3.2. Analysis and Mapping
3.3. Conceptual Model Design
3.4. Conceptual Model Validation
3.4.1. Reliability Analysis
3.4.2. Data Collection
3.4.3. Measurement of Variables and Evaluation of Structural Model
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Result
4.2. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- International Cooperative Alliance (ICA). Available online: https://www.ica.coop/ (accessed on 11 January 2022).
- Becchetti, L.; Ciciretti, R.; Paolantonio, A. The cooperative bank difference before and after the global financial crisis. J. Int. Money Financ. 2016, 69, 224–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, C.; Jia, F.; Xu, X. Agricultural co-operative sustainability: Evidence from four Chinese pig production co-operatives. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, T.; Nelson, D.; Huybrechts, B.; Dufays, F.; O’Shea, N.; Trasciani, G. Emergent identity formation and the co-operative: Theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2016, 28, 286–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benson, T. Building good management practices in Ethiopian agricultural cooperatives through regular financial audits. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2014, 2, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, J.; Guo, H.; Jia, F. Technological innovation in agricultural co-operatives in China: Implications for agro-food innovation policies. Food Policy 2017, 73, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruostesaari, M.; Troberg, E. Differences in social responsibility toward youth—A case study based comparison of cooperatives and corporations. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2016, 4, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzmán, C.; Santos, F.J.; Barroso, M.D.L.O. Analysing the links between cooperative principles, entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 55, 1075–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, W.; Ferreira, P.; Araújo, M. Mining co-operatives: A model to establish a network for sustainability. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2019, 7, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliopoulos, C.; Värnik, R.; Filippi, M.; Võlli, L.; Laaneväli-Vinokurov, K. Organizational design in Estonian agricultural cooperatives. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2019, 7, 100093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgstro, M. Effective co-operative governance: A practitioner’ s perspective. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2013, 1, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gupta, C. The co-operative model as a ‘living experiment in democracy’. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 2, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooks, T.; Mccarthy, O.; Power, C.; Macken-walsh, Á. A co-operative business approach in a values-based supply chain: A case study of a beef co-operative. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2017, 5, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pokharel, K.P.; Archer, D.W.; Featherstone, A.M. The Impact of Size and Specialization on the Financial Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2020, 8, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juga, J.; Juntunen, J. Antecedents of retail patronage in cooperative retail context. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2018, 6, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKillop, D.; French, D.; Quinn, B.; Sobiech, A.L.; Wilson, J.O.S. Cooperative financial institutions: A review of the literature. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2020, 71, 101520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurimoto, A. Cooperative Law: Japan; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Chareonwongsak, K. Enhancing board motivation for competitive performance of Thailand’ s co-operatives. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2017, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, G.V.; Parycek, P.; Falco, E.; Kleinhans, R. Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Inf. Polity 2018, 23, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garcia Alonso, R.; Lippez-De Castro, S. Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy. Public Adm. Inf. Technol. 2016, 11, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholl, H.J.; Scholl, M.C. Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice. In Proceedings of the iConference 2014 Proceedings, Berlin, Germany, 4–7 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Bolívar, M.P.R. Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. Sci. Reg. 2018, 17, 57–80. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, T.A.; Oliver, M.; Ramalhinho, H. Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rose, J.; Persson, J.S.; Heeager, L.T. How e-Government managers prioritise rival value positions: The efficiency imperative. Inf. Polity 2015, 20, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koltay, T. Data governance, data literacy and the management of data quality. IFLA J. 2016, 42, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nachrowi, E.; Nurhadryani, Y.; Sukoco, H. Evaluation of Governance and Management of Information Technology Services Using Cobit 2019 and ITIL 4. J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. Teknol. Inf.) 2020, 4, 764–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, L.C.D.; Ferreira, S.B.L.; Bernardini, F.C.; Cappelli, C. Towards a COBIT5 approach to ICT governance requirements in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Athens, Greece, 23–25 September 2020; pp. 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falconer, G.; Mitchell, S. Smart City Framework: A Systematic Process for Enabling Smart+Connected Communities. Cisco Internet Bus. Solut. Gr. 2012, 12, 2–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hon, W.K.; Millard, C. Banking in the cloud: Part 3—Contractual issues. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2018, 34, 595–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, V.; Benford, T.; Canada, J.; Sutton, S.G. Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 2015, 19, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijer, A.; Bolívar, M.P.R. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2016, 82, 392–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stratu-Strelet, D.; Gil-Gómez, H.; Oltra-Badenes, R.; Oltra-Gutierrez, J.V. Critical factors in the institutionalization of e-participation in e-government in Europe: Technology or leadership? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 164, 120489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govada, S.S.; Spruijt, W.; Rodgers, T. Smart city concept and framework. In Smart Economy in Smart Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Caragliu, A.; del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P. Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riggins, F.J.; Klamm, B.K. Data governance case at KrauseMcMahon LLP in an era of self-service BI and Big Data. J. Account. Educ. 2017, 38, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemaghaei, M.; Ebrahimi, S.; Hassanein, K. Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2018, 27, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, O.; Lee, N.; Shin, B. Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdegay, J.L.; Rodríguez, Z. A new decision support system for knowledge management in archaeological activities. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2020, 187, 104843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirasakthana, M.; Kiattisin, S. Sustainable government enterprise architecture framework. Sustainability 2021, 13, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jho, W.; Song, K.J. Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? Gov. Inf. Q. 2015, 32, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vázquez, J.L.; Lanero, A.; Gutiérrez, P.; Sahelices, C. The Contribution of Smart Cities to Quality of Life from the View of Citizens. In Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, X.; Liang, Q.; Deng, W.; Hendrikse, G. CEOs versus members ’ evaluation of cooperative performance: Evidence from China. Soc. Sci. J. 2019, 57, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamouni, E.; Mazzarol, T.; Soutar, N.; Siddique, K.H. The member wears Four Hats: A member identification framework for cooperative enterprises. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2018, 6, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Q.; Hendrikse, G.; Huang, Z.; Xu, X. Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence From Zhejiang Province. Agribusiness 2015, 31, 198–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reed, M.S.; Vella, S.; Challies, E.; de Vente, J.; Frewer, L.; Hohenwallner-Ries, D.; Huber, T.; Neumann, R.K.; Oughton, E.A.; Sidoli del Ceno, J.; et al. A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restor. Ecol. 2018, 26, S7–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hammad Ahmad Khan, H.; Yaacob, M.A.; Abdullah, H.; Abu Bakar Ah, S.H. Factors affecting performance of co-operatives in Malaysia. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2016, 65, 641–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yobe, C.L.; Ferrer, S.R.D.; Mudhara, M. Measuring the financial efficiency of agricultural cooperatives in South Africa: An application of the Simar–Wilson methodology. Agrekon 2020, 59, 269–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirimtat, A.; Krejcar, O.; Kertesz, A.; Tasgetiren, M.F. Future Trends and Current State of Smart City Concepts: A Survey. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 86448–86467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piasecki, P. The influence of employee membership on training intensity: The case of Polish co-operative banks. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2021, 9, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, M.K. Role of Technology in Smart Governance: “Smart City, Safe City”. SSRN Electron. J. 2013, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Farouh, H.; Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation 2012, 25, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomor, Z.; Meijer, A.; Michels, A.; Geertman, S. Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. J. Urban Technol. 2019, 26, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anggraeni, M.; Gupta, J.; Verrest, H.J.L.M. Cost and value of stakeholders participation: A systematic literature review. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 101, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Zhang, J.; Puron-Cid, G. Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinod Kumar, T.M.; Dahiya, B. Smart economy in smart cities. In Smart Economy in Smart Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Loukis, E.; Janssen, M.; Mintchev, I. Determinants of software-as-a-service benefits and impact on firm performance. Decis. Support Syst. 2019, 117, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-González, D.; Díaz-Díaz, R. Public services provided with ICT in the smart city environment: The case of Spanish cities. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 2015, 21, 248–267. [Google Scholar]
- Oswald, G.; Kleinemeier, M. Shaping the Digital Enterprise: Trends and Use Cases in Digital Innovation and Transformation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Larivière, B.; Bowen, D.; Andreassen, T.W.; Kunz, W.; Sirianni, N.J.; Voss, C.; Wünderlich, N.V.; De Keyser, A. “Service Encounter 2.0”: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 79, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ciuchita, R.; Mahr, D.; Odekerken-schröder, G. “Deal with it”: How coping with e-service innovation affects the customer experience. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 103, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, M.; Davidson, E.; Vargo, S.L. Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Q. 2015, 39, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, R.; Xie, Z.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J. Improving high-tech enterprise innovation in big data environment: A combinative view of internal and external governance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 50, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díaz-Díaz, R.; Pérez-González, D. Implementation of social media concepts for e-Government: Case study of a social media tool for value co-creation and citizen participation. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2016, 28, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Charalabidis, Y.; Koussouris, S. Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Cronemberger, F.; Gil-Garcia, J.R. Big data and analytics as strategies to generate public value in smart cities: Proposing an integrative framework. Public Adm. Inf. Technol. 2019, 35, 247–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y. A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecomm. Policy 2018, 42, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Wang, X. A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017, 191, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeidi, P.; Saeidi, S.P.; Sofian, S.; Saeidi, S.P.; Nilashi, M.; Mardani, A. The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2019, 63, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogan, N.; Lee, K.J. Exploratory Research on the Success Factors and Challenges of Smart City Projects. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 24, 141–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Zhang, X.; Geertman, S. Toward smart governance and social sustainability for Chinese migrant communities. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walravens, N. Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bolívar, M.P.R.; Meijer, A.J. Smart Governance: Using a Literature Review and Empirical Analysis to Build a Research Model. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2016, 34, 673–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barns, S. Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City Cult. Soc. 2018, 12, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Blanc, D. E-participation: A Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends; Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Volume 163, pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gervasi, O.; Murgante, B.; Misra, S.; Stankova, E.; Torre, C.M.; Maria, A.; Taniar, D.; Apduhan, B.O.; Hutchison, D. Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2018. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2–5 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Viale Pereira, G.; Cunha, M.A.; Lampoltshammer, T.J.; Parycek, P.; Testa, M.G. Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2017, 23, 526–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferramosca, S. A worldwide empirical analysis of the accounting behaviour in the waste management sector. Waste Manag. 2019, 88, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathuva, D.M. Drivers of financial and social disclosure by savings and credit cooperatives in Kenya: A managerial perspective. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2016, 4, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, C.; Gunawan, J.; Madi, N.; Janggu, T.; Rahmat, M.; Mohamed, N. Realising sustainable development goals via online integrity framework disclosure: Evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian local authorities. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, R.; Muttakin, M.; Khan, A.; Subramaniam, N.; Somanath, V.S. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial transparency: Evidence from India. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 2019, 56, 330–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozłowski, Ł. Cooperative banks, the internet and market discipline. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2016, 4, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manita, R.; Elommal, N.; Baudier, P.; Hikkerova, L. The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 150, 119751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.I.; Chang, L.M.; Liao, J.C. Risk factors of enterprise internal control under the internet of things governance: A qualitative research approach. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebhatu, K.T.; Gezahegn, T.W.; Berhanu, T.; Maertens, M.; Van Passel, S.; D’Haese, M. Conflict, fraud, and distrust in Ethiopian agricultural cooperatives. J. Co-Oper. Organ. Manag. 2020, 8, 100106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelidou, M.; Psaltoglou, A.; Komninos, N.; Kakderi, C.; Tsarchopoulos, P.; Panori, A. Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2018, 9, 146–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, P.B.; Navío-Marco, J. Governance and economics of smart cities: Opportunities and challenges. Telecomm. Policy 2018, 42, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, H.; Geertman, S.; Witte, P. Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2020, 47, 1343–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, T.M.; Guerrero, S.; Burke, G.B.; Cook, M.; Cresswell, A.; Helbig, N.; Hrdinova, J.; Pardo, T. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf. Polity 2012, 17, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatfield, A.T.; Reddick, C.G.; Brajawidagda, U. Government surveillance disclosures, bilateral trust and Indonesia-Australia cross-border security cooperation: Social network analysis of Twitter data. Gov. Inf. Q. 2015, 32, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddick, C.G.; Chatfield, A.T.; Jaramillo, P.A. Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 2015, 32, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholl, H.J.; Alawadhi, S. Creating Smart Governance: The key to radical ICT overhaul at the City of Munich. Inf. Polity 2016, 21, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surbakti, F.P.S.; Wang, W.; Indulska, M.; Sadiq, S. Factors influencing effective use of big data: A research framework. Inf. Manag. 2019, 57, 103146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeganeh, N.K.; Sadiq, S.; Sharaf, M.A. A framework for data quality aware query systems. Inf. Syst. 2014, 46, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, M.; Brous, P.; Estevez, E.; Barbosa, L.S.; Janowski, T. Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Gov. Inf. Q. 2020, 37, 101493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, R.; Schneider, J.; Brocke, J. Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 424–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merino, J.; Caballero, I.; Rivas, B.; Serrano, M.; Piattini, M. A Data Quality in Use model for Big Data. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2016, 63, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roychowdhury; Verdi, R.S. The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review. J. Account. Econ. 2019, 68, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulaiman, H.; Abdullah Maamuom, M. Determinants of Success for ERP Data Governance Implementation in a Malaysian Utility Organization. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2017, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ruithe, M.; Benkhelifa, E. Determining the enabling factors for implementing cloud data governance in the Saudi public sector by structural equation modelling. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 107, 1061–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Broek, T.; van Veenstra, A.F. Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 129, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.S.; Lin, S.L.; Chou, T.H.; Li, B.Y. An integrated data analytics process to optimize data governance of non-profit organization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 101, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.I.; Yen, D.C.; Chang, I.C.; Jan, D. Internal control framework for a compliant ERP system. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 187–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, H.; Alam, Z.; Rahman, A.; Wang, G. Economic perspective analysis of protecting big data security and privacy. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 98, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ruithe, M.; Benkhelifa, E.; Hameed, K. A Conceptual Framework for Designing Data Governance for Cloud Computing. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 94, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gulati, R.; Kattumuri, R.; Kumar, S. A non-parametric index of corporate governance in the banking industry: An application to Indian data. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2019, 70, 100702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payne, A.; Frow, P.; Eggert, A. The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2017, 45, 467–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bocken, N.; Short, S.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corp. Gov. 2013, 13, 482–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldassarre, B.; Calabretta, G.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Jaskiewicz, T. Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carvalho, J.; Jonker, J. Creating a Value Proposition: Exploring the Advanced Business Creation Model. J. Appl. Manag. Entrep. 2015, 20, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voorberg, W.H.; Bekkers, V.J.J.M.; Tummers, L.G. A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 2015, 17, 1333–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Osborne, S.P.; Radnor, Z.; Strokosch, K. Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Manag. Rev. 2016, 18, 639–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamidi, F.; Gharneh, N.S.; Khajeheian, D. A conceptual framework for value co-creation in servicenterprises (Case of tourism agencies). Sustainability 2020, 12, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Qamar, N.; Ahmad, A.; Farooq, S. Assessment of Financial Technology Services for Value Co-Creation or Value Co-Destruction in Emerging Economies: Ispar Model. Int. J. Manag. 2020, 11, 238–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivas-Asanza, W.; Celleri-Pacheco, J.; Andrade-Garda, J.; García-Vázquez, R.; Mato-Abad, V.; Rodríguez-Yáñez, S.; Suárez-Garaboa, S. Environmental sustainability in information technologies governance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Haes, S.; Van Grembergen, W.; Anant, J.; Huygh, T. Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Achieving Alignment and Value in Digital Organizations; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Halabi, T.; Bellaiche, M. Towards quantification and evaluation of security of Cloud Service Providers. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2017, 33, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rofifah, D. An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. Pap. Knowl. Towar. A Media Hist. Doc. 2020, 37, 12–26. [Google Scholar]
- Mutimukwe, C.; Kolkowska, E.; Grönlund, Å. Information privacy in e-service: Effect of organizational privacy assurances on individual privacy concerns, perceptions, trust and self-disclosure behavior. Gov. Inf. Q. 2019, 37, 101413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Haes, S.; Van Grembergen, W. COBIT as a Framework for Enterprise Governance of IT. Manag. Prof. 2015, 2, 103–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicho, M.; Mourad, B.A.I. Success Factors for Integrated Itil Deployment: An it Governance Classification. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 2012, 14, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ITIL 4 Overview. Available online: https://www.protechtraining.com/ (accessed on 15 December 2021).
- ITIL4 Value Streams and Processes. Available online: https://www.info.axiossystems.com/ (accessed on 10 December 2021).
- Fox-Wasylyshyn, S.M.; El-Masri, M.M. Focus on Research Methods Handling Missing Data in Self-Report Measures. Res. Nurs. Health 2005, 28, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tongprasert, S.; Rapipong, J.; Buntragulpoontawee, M. The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Thai (DASH-TH). J. Hand Ther. 2014, 27, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nuanmeesri, S. The augmented reality for teaching Thai students about the human heart. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2018, 13, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almanasreh, E.; Moles, R.; Chen, T.F. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2019, 15, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chopra, G.; Madan, P.; Jaisingh, P.; Bhaskar, P. Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2019, 16, 94–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdfelder, E.; FAul, F.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iacobucci, D. Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. J. Consum. Psychol. 2009, 19, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alavi, M.; Visentin, D.C.; Thapa, D.K.; Hunt, G.E.; Watson, R.; Cleary, M. Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2020, 76, 2209–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M.R.; Mullen, J.; Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M.R. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2008, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate Data Analysis; Harlow Pearson Educ. Ltd.: Harlow, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Makkar, S.; Singh, A.K. Spirituality measurement scale: An empirical study. Purushartha 2019, 12, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
- Godleski, S.; Lohse, B.; Krall, J.S. Satter Eating Competence Inventory Subscale Restructure After Confirmatory Factor Analysis. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2019, 51, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Harerimana, A.; Mtshali, N.G. Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to understand the role of technology in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 2020, 92, 104490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bradley, K.L.; Bagnell, A.L.; Brannen, C.L. Factorial validity of the center for epidemiological studies depression 10 in adolescents. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2010, 31, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, D.; Lee, T.; Maydeu-Olivares, A. Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2019, 79, 310–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neirotti, P.; De Marco, A.; Cagliano, A.C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F. Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 2014, 38, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Variables | Reference |
---|---|
Knowledge | Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Koltay (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Vázquez et al. (2018), Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019), Kirimtat et al. (2020), Yobe, Ferrer, and Mudhara (2020), Piasecki (2021). |
Participation | Mishra (2013), Jho and Song (2015), Rose, Qiao Liang, George Hendrikse, Zuhui Huang (2015), Persson, and Heeager (2015), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Chareonwongsak (2017), Pereira et al. (2018), Reed et al. (2018), Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019), Anggraeni, Gupta, and Verrest (2019), Tomor et al. (2019), Stratu-Strelet et al. (2021). |
Communication | Caragliu, del Bo, and Nijkamp (2011), Falconer and Mitchell (2012), Lombardi et al. (2012), Mishra (2013), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019). |
Collaboration | Harrison et al. (2012), Hans J Scholl and Scholl (2014), Jho and Song (2015), Rose, Persson, and Heeager (2015), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Rodríguez Bolívar (2018), Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019), McKillop et al. (2020), Oliveira, Oliver, and Ramalhinho (2020) |
Value Proposition | Bocken et al. (2013), Mishra (2013), M. S. Carvalho (2015), Pérez-González and Díaz-Díaz (2015), Koltay (2016), Oswald and Kleinemeier (2016), Baldassarre et al. (2017), Gil-Garcia, Zhang, and Puron-Cid (2016), Larivière et al. (2017), Luo, Guo, and Jia (2017), Payne, Frow, and Eggert (2017), Juga and Juntunen (2018), Vázquez et al. (2018), Y. Lin (2018), Ciuchita, Mahr, and Odekerken-schröder (2019), Loukis, Janssen, and Mintchev (2019), R. Lin et al. (2020), Sheng, Amankwah-Amoah, and Wang (2017). |
Value Co-Creation | Bocken et al. (2013), Charalabidis and Koussouris (2014), Voorberg, Bekkers, and Tummers (2015), Díaz-Díaz and Pérez-González (2016), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), McKillop et al. (2020), Osborne, Radnor, and Strokosch (2016), Oswald and Kleinemeier (2016), Baldassarre et al. (2017), Payne, Frow, and Eggert (2017), Cronemberger and Gil-Garcia (2019), Hamidi, Gharneh, and Khajeheian (2020), QAMAR, AHMAD, and FAROOQ (2020). |
Democracy | Borgstro (2013), Mishra (2013), Hans J Scholl and Scholl (2014), Chatfield, Reddick, and Brajawidagda (2015), Chatfield, Reddick, and Reddick, Chatfield, and Jaramillo (2015), Lin, Zhang, and Geertman (2015), Qiao Liang, George Hendrikse, Zuhui Huang (2015), Díaz-Díaz and Pérez-González (2016), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Koltay (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Ruostesaari and Troberg (2016), Viale Pereira et al. (2017), Pereira et al. (2018), Rodríguez Bolívar (2018), Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019) Y. Lin (2018), Blanc (2020), Oliveira, Oliver, and Ramalhinho (2020), Reis et al. (2020), Stratu-Strelet et al.(2021) |
Regulation | Kurimoto (2013), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016). |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Charalabidis and Koussouris (2014), Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), McKillop et al. (2020), Chareonwongsak (2017), Viale Pereira et al. (2017) Rodríguez Bolívar (2018), Manita et al. (2020). |
Corporate Governance | Borgstro (2013), Chang et al. (2014), Kwon, Lee, and Shin (2014), Yeganeh, Sadiq, and Sharaf (2014)Arnold et al. (2015), Chatfield, Reddick, and Brajawidagda (2015), Reddick, Chatfield, and Jaramillo (2015), Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016), Hans Jochen Scholl and Alawadhi (2016), Gil-Garcia, Zhang, and Puron-Cid (2016), Mathuva (2016), Meijer and Bolívar (2016), Ghasemaghaei, Ebrahimi, and Hassanein (2018), Hon and Millard (2018), van den Broek and van Veenstra (2018), Abraham, Schneider, and Brocke (2019), Ferramosca (2019), Saeidi et al. (2019), Wang et al. (2019), Al-Ruithe and Benkhelifa (2020), Chang, Chang, and Liao (2020), Janssen et al. (2020), Reis et al. (2020), R. Lin et al. (2020), Verdegay and Rodríguez (2020),Yobe, Ferrer, and Mudhara (2020). |
Authors/Research Article/ Standard/Framework/Concept | Smart Member | Smart Economy | Smart Governance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge | Participation | Communication | Collaboration | Value Proposition | Value Creation | Democracy | Regulation | Monitoring | Corporate Governance | |
Stratu-Strelet et al. (2021) | X | X | ||||||||
McKillop et al. (2020) | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Oliveira, Oliver, and Ramalhinho (2020) | X | X | X | |||||||
R. Lin et al. (2020) | X | X | X | |||||||
Yobe, Ferrer, and Mudhara (2020) | X | X | X | |||||||
Alves, Ferreira, and Araújo (2019) | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Pereira et al. (2018) | X | X | X | |||||||
Reed et al. (2018) | X | X | X | |||||||
Rodríguez Bolívar (2018) | X | X | ||||||||
Vázquez et al. (2018) | X | X | ||||||||
Y. Lin (2018) | X | X | ||||||||
Baldassarre et al. (2017) | X | X | ||||||||
Chareonwongsak (2017) | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Payne, Frow, and Eggert (2017) | X | X | ||||||||
Viale Pereira et al. (2017) | X | X | ||||||||
Díaz-Díaz and Pérez-González (2016) | X | X | ||||||||
Garcia Alonso and Lippez-De Castro (2016) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
Koltay (2016) | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Meijer and Bolívar (2016) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Chatfield, Reddick, and Brajawidagda (2015) | X | X | ||||||||
Jho and Song (2015) | X | X | X | |||||||
Charalabidis and Koussouris (2014) | X | X | ||||||||
Hans J Scholl and Scholl (2014) | X | X | ||||||||
Bocken et al. (2013) | X | X | X | |||||||
Borgstro (2013) | X | X | ||||||||
Mishra (2013) | X | X | X | X |
Dimensions | Measured Factors (10) | Items | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|---|---|
Smart Members | Knowledge | 3 | 0.851 |
Participation | 3 | 0.919 | |
Communication | 3 | 0.907 | |
Smart Economy | Collaboration | 4 | 0.908 |
Value Proposition | 5 | 0.945 | |
Value Co-creation | 3 | 0.939 | |
Smart Governance | Democracy | 3 | 0.851 |
Regulation | 4 | 0.827 | |
Monitoring and Evaluation | 5 | 0.934 | |
Corporate Governance | 5 | 0.961 |
Latent | Smart Member | Smart Economy | Smart Governance | r2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observe | i | bi | S.E. | i | bi | S.E. | i | bi | S.E. | |
Knowledge | 0.868 * | 1.000 * | - | 0.754 | ||||||
Participation | 0.888 * | 0.974 * | 0.039 | 0.788 | ||||||
Communication | 0.890 * | 0.936 * | 0.037 | 0.792 | ||||||
Collaboration | 0.958 * | 0.966 * | 0.025 | 0.917 | ||||||
Value Proposition | 0.930 * | 0.894 * | 0.023 | 0.866 | ||||||
Value Co-creation | 0.921 * | 1.000 * | - | 0.848 | ||||||
Democracy | 0.844 * | 0.932 * | 0.029 | 0.712 | ||||||
Regulation | 0.923 * | 1.000 * | - | 0.851 | ||||||
Monitoring and Evaluation | 0.899 * | 0.873 * | 0.029 | 0.808 | ||||||
Corporate Governance | 0.865 * | 0.764 * | 0.026 | 0.749 | ||||||
Latent | Smart Co-Operative | R2 | ||||||||
i | bi | S.E. | ||||||||
Smart Member | 0.954 * | 0.877 * | 0.012 | 0.910 | ||||||
Smart Economy | 1.000 * | 1.000 * | - | 1.000 | ||||||
Smart Governance | 0.966 * | 0.970 * | 0.013 | 0.934 | ||||||
χ2 = 28.206, df = 20, Relative χ2 = 1.410, p-Value = 0.105, GFI = 0.987, NFI = 0.995, TLI = 0.997, CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.031, RMR = 0.006 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chawviang, A.; Kiattisin, S. Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063641
Chawviang A, Kiattisin S. Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework. Sustainability. 2022; 14(6):3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063641
Chicago/Turabian StyleChawviang, Anassaya, and Supaporn Kiattisin. 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework" Sustainability 14, no. 6: 3641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063641