Next Article in Journal
Topic Modeling for Hiking Trail Online Reviews: Analysis of the Mutianyu Great Wall
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Wu, S. The Temporal-Spatial Distribution and Information-Diffusion-Based Risk Assessment of Forest Fires in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13859
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Prickly Pear Seed Cake for the Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution

1
Laboratory for the Application of Materials to the Environment, Water and Energy (LR21ES15), Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa 2112, Tunisia
2
Depertment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa 2112, Tunisia
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye 80000, Turkey
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Hail, Hail 81451, Saudi Arabia
5
Organic Chemistry Laboratory (LR17ES08), Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3245; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063245
Submission received: 3 February 2022 / Revised: 26 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 10 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Chemical Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

:
In this study, we evaluated the use of prickly pear seed cake, a by-product of prickly pear seed oil extraction, as a new precursor for producing activated carbon by phosphoric acid activation, and the obtained carbon’s capacity for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution. Response surface methodology based on the full factorial design at two levels (24) was developed to reduce the number of experiments and reach optimal preparation conditions for the removal of cadmium and lead ions from aqueous solutions. Design Expert 11.1.2.0 Trial software was used for generating the statistical experimental design and analyzing the observed data. Factors influencing the activation process, such as carbonization temperature, activation temperature, activation time, and impregnation ratio, were studied. Responses were studied in depth with an analysis of variance to estimate their significance. Each response was outlined by a first-order regression equation demonstrating satisfactory correspondence between the predicted and experimental results as the adjusted coefficients of correlation. Based on the statistical data, the best conditions for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by the obtained activated carbon were indicated. The maximum iodine number and methylene blue index were 2527.3 mg g−1 and 396.5 mg g−1, respectively, using activated carbon obtained at the following conditions: Tc = 500 °C, Ta = 500 °C, impregnation ratio = 2:1 (g H3PO4: g carbon), and activation time of two hours. The maximum adsorption reached 170.2 mg g−1 and 158.4 mg g−1 for Cd2+ and Pb2+, respectively, using activated carbon obtained at the following conditions: Tc = 600 °C, Ta = 400 °C, impregnation ratio = 2:1 (g H3PO4: g carbon), and activation time of one hour. The activated carbon obtained was characterized by Boehm titration, pH of point of zero charge (pHPZC), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (SBET), and scanning electron microscopy. Adsorption was performed according to different parameters: pH solution, adsorbent dosage, temperature, contact time, and initial concentration. Regeneration experiments proved that the obtained activated carbon still had a high removal capacity for Cd2+ and Pb2+ after five regeneration cycles.

1. Introduction

With the development of industry, environmental contamination has become increasingly alarming [1,2,3]. Indeed, liquid discharges contaminated with pollutants have become an issue of major concern [4,5], given the environmentally unfriendly harmful effects induced [6]. The problem is further aggravated when it comes to non-biodegradable and toxic pollutants such as heavy metals, which are classified as among the most hazardous elements [7]. Toxic and carcinogenic heavy metals include cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb). Their main sources are the wastewater treatment stations of various industries [8]. Cd and Pb are toxic metals and are proven to have harmful impacts on the human body; they mostly accumulate in the kidneys and have a long biological half-life in the human body [9,10,11]. Several treatment technologies have been adopted for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater, such as electrochemical treatment [12], reverse osmosis [13,14], flocculation [15], precipitation [16,17], membrane filtration [18], ion exchange [19,20], and adsorption [21,22]. Among these processes, adsorption is one of the most favorable and economical methods for the removal of heavy metals due to its effectiveness and simplicity [23]. It proved interesting to develop an adsorbent with high efficiency and low cost for the removal of heavy metals. Activated carbon is mostly used for treating wastewater due to (i) its important porous structure [24],(ii) its high surface area and high adsorption capacity [25], and (iii) its wide availability and rapid biodegradability [26,27]. Different agricultural biomasses of rice husk [28], animal manure [29], fruit peel [30], orange peels [31], date palm petiole [32], Opuntia ficus indica [33], and Posidonia oceanica [34] have been used for the production of activated carbon. Motivated by the search for a new precursor, prickly pear seed cake was considered in this study. Prickly pear is an edible fruit that cultivates spontaneously in Tunisia. The fruit consists of about 10–15% seeds [35]. These seeds are usually rejected as waste, although their use as a by-product generates a novel and valuable source of oil [36], as well as functional ingredients that are used in the food industry (seed cake). Prickly pear seed cake is produced in large quantities as a by-product of the prickly pear seed oil extraction industry. Consequently, preparing activated carbons with prickly pear seed cake is an interesting approach to valorize this raw material [37,38]. The preparation of activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomasses can be divided into two different methods: chemical and physical activation. The physical process consists of the thermal oxidation of carbon at a temperature between 300 and 1000 °C in the presence of oxygen, carbon dioxide, or water vapor [39]. Thus, chemical activation produces highly porous activated carbon by impregnation of the carbon precursor with chemical activating agents such as phosphoric acid [40], potassium hydroxide [41], and zinc chloride [42], at temperatures ranging between 400 and 800 °C. To generate activated carbons having some particular characteristics, it is necessary to have detailed knowledge of the effects of several parameters of the production process on the ultimate performance of the activated carbons.
The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing activated carbons with high porosity from prickly pear seed cake biomass after bio-oil extraction. Thus, the effects of the main preparation process parameters on the performance of adsorbents produced from residual biomass were investigated and optimized. Phosphoric acid activation was applied to produce activated carbon and the resulting properties were examined. The factors included in the experimental design were the carbonization temperature (Tc), impregnation ratio (IR), activation temperature (Ta), and activation time (t). Four responses are analyzed: methylene blue index (MB index), iodine number (IN), and cadmium (Cd removal) and lead (Pb removal) ion removal. Response surface methodology based on the full factorial design at two levels (24) was used to acquire the optimal preparation conditions and to investigate the greatest removal efficiency of heavy metals. The statistical experimental design and the observed data were generated and analyzed by Design Expert 11.1.2.0 Trial software. The obtained activated carbons were characterized and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, Boehm titration, pH of point zero charge (pHPZC), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (SBET). The effects of pH and time on the adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ processes on the optimized activated carbon were studied. Moreover, the equilibrium data were analyzed using Langmuir and Freundlich models of the adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ onto the optimized activated carbon.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3 ≥ 99%), cadmium chloride (CdCl2 ≥ 99%), and lead chloride (PbCl2 ≥ 99%) were supplied by Fluka, Tunisia. Methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S), iodine (I2 ≥ 99.8%), potassium iodide (KI ≥ 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH ≥ 98%), and hydrochloric acid (HCl 37%) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich, Tunisia. Phosphoric acid (H3PO4 ≥ 98%) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3 ≥ 99%) were supplied by Scharlau. Sodium thiosulfate was supplied by Panreac.

2.2. Prickly Pear Seed Cake Characterization

Prickly pear seed cake was chosen as a precursor in the preparation of activated carbon because of its availability and its physicochemical characteristics. The prickly pear seed cake used in this study was provided by Omega Tunisia ltd., a company operating in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia. The cake is a by-product of oil extraction from prickly pear seeds. The chemical composition of prickly pear cake was determined according to TAPPI standardized methods as previously described [43,44,45,46,47], namely, ash content T211 om-07,lignin T222 om-06, holocellulose Wise et al. method [48], and α-cellulose T 203 cm-99. Elemental analysis of prickly pear cake was performed with the Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 CHNS-O Analyzer.

2.3. Preparation of Activated Carbon

Prickly pear seed cake was crushed and sieved. Then, it was carbonized in a rotary kiln under nitrogen gas at a flow rate of 100 mL min−1. The carbonized cake was activated using phosphoric acid. Phosphoric acid was diluted with distilled water to obtain a solution of 85 wt % and then used as an activating agent in a mass ratio of 2:1 (g H3PO4/g carbon). For each sample, a mass of 20 g of carbon was used. The residual phosphoric acid was eliminated from activated carbons by washing with hot distilled water until reaching a neutral pH. The obtained filtrate was then dried at 105 °C until reaching a constant weight. The product was kept in a hermetic bottle for subsequent tests.

2.4. Experimental Design and Analysis

Factorial experimental design is an expeditious method used to reduce the number of experiments required. It studies possible interactions between factors and their effects on the responses to optimize process performance [49]. Factors and their levels including temperature of carbonization (Tc = 500 or 600 °C), impregnation ratio (IR = 1:1 or 2:1 (g:g)), temperature of activation (Ta = 400 or 500 °C), and activation time (t = 1 or 2 h) were considered in this study. These variables with their respective domains were chosen from the literature as well as preliminary experiments. The experiments were performed according to a full factorial design at two levels (24), with 16 experiments, to investigate not only the effects of factors but also the possible interactions between factors. Design Expert 11.1.2.0 software was used to generate the experimental design and analyze the observed data. A first-order model with all possible interactions was chosen to fit the experimental data (Equation (1)). The goodness of fit of the model was checked by the coefficient of determination R2 and R2adj. R2 value is a statistical measure of how well a model fits the real data points. The R2 values range from 0 to 1, where 1 represents the ideal model.
Y = b0 + b1 A + b2 B + b3 C + b4 D + b12 AB + b13 AC + b14 AD + b23 BC + b24 BD + b34 CD + b123 ABC + b124 ABD + b134 ACD + b234 BCD + b1234 ABCD
where A, B, C, and D refer to the factors of the study. Y represents the responses of interest: MB index, IN, Cd removal, and Pb removal.
Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the combination effect of the important reaction variables.

2.5. Adsorption Capacity Evaluation

The adsorption capacity of the prepared prickly pear seed cake-derived activated carbon was assessed using batch adsorption tests. We investigated adsorption of iodine, methylene blue, cadmium, and lead. During these adsorption tests, a given quantity of activated carbon was added to the adsorbate solution, and the mixture was stirred using a tilting shaker at 120 rpm for 1080 min at room temperature.
In the iodine adsorption experiment, 1 g of each activated carbon was treated with 10 mL of 5% HCl and then boiled for 30 s, and cooled. Then, 100 mL of 0.1 mol L−1 iodine solution was added to the mixture and stirred for 30 min. The resulting solution was filtered, and 50 mL of the filtrate was titrated with 0.1 mol L−1 sodium thiosulfate solution using starch as an indicator [50]. IN was determined using the ASTM D4607-94 method.
The MB index was used to evaluate the macroporosity of activated carbon and therefore its adsorptive capacity concerning large molecules (diameter ≥1.5 nm). In practical terms, the MB index was determined by agitating 50 mg of activated carbon and 10 mL of 2000 mg L−1 of a methylene blue solution for 4 h. Afterward, the suspension was filtered, and the residual concentration of MB in the filtrate was determined by a Beckman UV/Vis DU800 spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 664 nm [51]. With respect to the adsorption of cadmium and lead, metal solutions were prepared by dissolving 268.7 mg of lead chloride and 327.3 mg of cadmium chloride in one liter of distilled water to obtain a concentration of 200 mg L−1. At room temperature (25 ± 2°C), 50 mL of the solution was poured at a concentration of 200 mg L−1 into a series of flasks containing 50 mg of activated carbon. The initial pH of the solution was adjusted to 6 using 0.1 mol L−1 HCl or NaOH. The samples remained under agitation for 3 h and were subsequently filtered and analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS, Thermo Fisher Scientific instrument, iCE 3500) equipped with an air–acetylene flame. The gas flow rate was 1.8 L min−1 and 2 L min−1 for Cd and Pb, respectively. Calibrations were performed by consecutive dilution using standard solutions. Absorption wavelengths of 228.8 nm and 217.0 nm were maintained for the determination of Cd and Pb, respectively. The slit was adjusted to 0.5 nm. The detection limits of the spectrophotometer were0.01 mg/L and 0.07 mg/L for Cd and Pb, respectively. Determination was based on average values of triplicates for each sample.

2.6. Characterization Methods

The SEM photos were obtained with a JEOL JSM-IT 100 type device. Basic and acidic surface groups were quantified using the Boehm titration method as previously described [32]. The pH of point zero charge (pHPZC) of the adsorbent is an important characteristic that was determined using Newcomb’s method [52] as previously described [32]. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (SBET) and pore structure parameters [49] of the adsorbent were acquired from nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument. Before the measurement, activated carbon (40 mg) was degassed at 300 °C for 8 h.

2.7. Adsorption Study on the Optimized Activated Carbon

The adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+, separately, on the optimized activated carbon AC2 was carried out in batch mode. To investigate the influence of the initial pH of the solution, 50 mL of the metal ion solution (200 mg L−1) was put in contact with 50 mg of the adsorbent. The initial pH was adjusted from 2 to 7 using HCl and NaOH solutions (0.1 mol L−1). The different solution samples were agitated for 720 min. Then, the samples were filtered, and metal ion concentration was determined.
For the evaluation of the absorbent dose, assays were performed at the following conditions: 50 mL of 200 mg L−1 metal ion; initial pH = 6; time = 720 min; adsorbent dose = 0.2, 0.8, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 g L−1.
To determine the suitable contact time on the adsorption, the same steps described previously were followed; 50 mg of activated carbon was agitated with 50 mL of the metal ion solution (200 mg L−1) (initial pH = 6) for the desired contact time up to 720 min.
For the effect of initial concentration, experiments were performed at the optimal determined conditions: initial pH = 6, adsorbent dose = 1 g L−1, 50 mL of the solution, varying the initial metal ion concentration from 20 to 200 mg L−1. Once filtered, the solution was analyzed to determine the metal ion concentration, which was used to measure the adsorption capacity of the metal ion solution. The equilibrium adsorption capacity Q (mg g−1) was determined according to Equation (2):
Q = ( C 0 C e ) V m
where C0 is the initial concentration (mg L−1), Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg L−1), V is the volume of solution (L), and m is the weight of the adsorbent (g). All adsorption experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Regeneration Study

The process of regeneration of the spent adsorbent was investigated to assess the economic and operational feasibility. The chemical regeneration method is the most widely applied in separating adsorbed molecules from the adsorbent sites, as it is relatively fast and occurs without affecting the pore structure of the activated carbon. In our experiment, 0.1 g of activated carbon saturated with Cd2+ or Pb2+ was treated with 50 mL of 1.0 mol L−1 HCl for 12 h. After separation by centrifugation, the treated adsorbent was washed several times with distilled water to completely remove Cl, and then 50 mg of activated carbon was reused in 50 mL of 200 mg L−1 Cd2+ or Pb2+. The adsorption/desorption procedure was repeated five times using the same procedure, and the concentrations of Cd2+ and Pb2+ in the supernatant after centrifugation were measured.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Prickly Pear Seed Cake

Prickly pear seed cake has a significant proportion of lignin of 19.2% (Table 1), which is comparable to Pituranthos chloranthus (17.6%) and Retama raetam (20.5%) [47], and still lower than that observed for tamarix aphylla (30.0%) [44].
The percentage of ash was approximately 1.2%, which is comparable to that reported by Masmoudi et al. (1.5%) [53]. However, this value is lower than other biomasses listed in Table 1. The holocellulose and cellulose contents were found to be 59.4% and 34.2%, respectively. Holocellulose content was comparable to other sources such as Pituranthos chloranthus, Retama raetam [47], and Opuntia ficus-indica [46] and higher than that of Tamarix aphylla [44]. Moreover, cellulose content was lower than in Tamarix aphylla [44], Pituranthos chloranthus [47], and Opuntia ficus-indica [46].The elemental analysis revealed that prickly pear seed cake is composed of carbon (48.36%), hydrogen (5.97%), nitrogen (1.35%), oxygen (42.91%), sulfur (0.20%), and other atoms (1.21%). Thus, the high carbon and low ash contents are important findings to consider prickly pear seed cake as a precursor for activated carbon preparation.

3.2. Adsorption Capacity of the Newly Prepared Activated Carbon

The MB index ranged from 380.4 to 396.5 mg g−1, indicating high porosity of the prepared samples (Table 2).
The activated carbon with the greatest IN (2527.3 mg g−1) and MB index (396.5 mg g−1) was obtained at Tc = 500 °C and Ta = 500 °C for 2 h with an IR = 2:1. The highest adsorption capacity of Cd2+ was 170.2 mg g−1 and 158.4 mg g−1 for Pb2+. The maximum adsorption capacities of both metal ions were obtained with the following conditions: Tc = 600 °C, IR = 2:1, Ta = 400 °C, and t = 1 h.

3.3. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Surface Response Analysis

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to assess the significance of the curvature in the responses at a confidence level of 95%. The results shown in Table 3 allow us to determine adequate equations that represent the actual interaction between each response and the significant variables. The second-and third-order interactions between these effects were considered insignificant relative to the other effects. The mathematical models for the determination of the IN, MB index, cadmium, and lead removal were used to build response surfaces as well as to determine the optimal conditions of this process. Figure 1 and Figure 2 present the 3D response surface plots for the significant interactions.
According to the ANOVA, the most significant effects for the MB index were Tc, IR, Ta, and the interactions (Tc_Ta) and (IR_Ta) (Equation (3)).
MB index = +389.7 − 1.58 Tc + 3.16 IR + 1.58 Ta + 0.56 (Tc_Ta) − 0.82 (IR_Ta)
Tc and (IR_Ta) presented a negative impact on the MB index response. IR, Ta, and (Tc_Ta) presented a negative effect. The ANOVA results show that the equations adequately represent the actual relationship between the response and the significant variables with a coefficient linear regression R2 = 0.913and adjusted coefficient of determination R2adj = 0.87.
For the MB index, the most significant interactions were (Tc_Ta) and (IR_Ta). Figure 1a shows that MB index increased with increasing Ta and decreasing Tc, and increased with increasing IR. Then, a greater MB index appeared with an IR of 2:1 (g:g), Tc was fixed at 500 °C, and the activation temperature was at 500 °C. Hence, an increase in porosity was observed with the increase in the phosphoric acid concentration, in the range of studied temperatures, due to the dehydration that occurred during the activation stage, leading to the development of the structure and the formation of pores. These results are in agreement with those found by previous studies about different precursors from lignocellulosic biomasses [55,56].
For the IN, the significant effects are Tc, IR, t, and the interactions (Tc_IR) and (IR_t) (Equation (4)).
IN = +2438.64 − 16.04 Tc + 68.75 IR + 25.50 t +11.28 (Tc_IR) − 9.74 (IR_t)
The correlation between the theoretical and experimental responses, calculated by the model, is satisfactory with a coefficient linear regression R2 = 0.84 and adjusted coefficient of determination R2adj = 0.81. It can be seen that IN is higher with an increase in impregnation ratio and activation time. In fact, at a low temperature, the activation may take place slowly, producing the development of the porosity of the obtained activated carbons, as well as an increase in the microporosity. The combination of the carbonization and impregnation ratio showed a positive effect on the IN (Figure 1b). Moreover, an increase in the micropores indicated by the IN occurred in the case of low levels of carbonization. Its maximum value was observed at Tc = 500°C, IR = 2:1, and Ta = 500°C.
However, the increase in iodine value with increasing activation time could be explained by the fact that prickly pear seed cakes are hard, and thus a long activation time allows for the development of carbon porosity [57]. These findings are in accordance with those of Khalili et al. [58]. Measured values of IN and MB index showed that the activated carbons obtained were also capable of adsorbing small and large molecules, thus suggesting the existence of micropores and macropores, as expected for activated carbons prepared by chemical activation from lignocellulosic biomass.
Based on the ANOVA data for the cadmium removal response, the most significant factors are Tc, Ta, activation time (t), and the interactions (Tc_Ta), (Tc_t), and (Ta_t) (Equation (5)).
Cd-removal = +114.01 + 18.71 Tc − 3.11 Ta − 9.51t − 4.26 (Tc_Ta) − 14.03 (Tc_t) + 5.78 (Ta_t)
ANOVA results show that the equations sufficiently represent the actual relationship between the response and the significant variables with a coefficient linear regression R2 = 0.82 and adjusted coefficient of determination R2adj = 0.70. The Tc was the most influential factor, having a positive effect. Thus, the effects of activation time and temperature were negative. The significant interactions included (TC_Ta), (TC_t), and (Ta_t). Figure 2a shows that cadmium adsorption increased with increasing Tc and decreasing Ta and t. A maximum response in adsorption of Cd2+ was obtained at a Tc of 600 °C, a Ta of 400 °C, and an activation time of 1 h.
For the lead removal, Tc, IR, activation time (t), and the interaction (IR_t) were the most significant effects (Equation (6)).
Pb-removal = +116.28 + 9.67 Tc + 11.69 IR − 10.40t − 5.34 (IR_t)
The coefficient linear regression and the adjusted coefficient of determination were statistically significant (R2 = 0.82; R2adj = 0.78). Therefore, Pb removal increased with the increase in Tc and IR also with a low-level activation time (t). It can be seen from Figure 2b that Pb removal increased with increasing the impregnation ratio and decreasing activation time. The maximum response in adsorption of Pb2+ was at a Tc of 600 °C, IR of 2:1, and an activation time of 1 h.
The correlation between the theoretical and experimental responses calculated by the model shows that the experimental data are in agreement with the data predicted by the model. The predicted coefficient of determination R2pred of each response is in reasonable agreement with R2adj (the difference is less than 0.2). Values of p-Value Prob>F are less than 0.05, indicating that the model terms are significant. In addition, large values of F-Value and reduced values of p-Value Prob confirm the significant effect of the corresponding variables. The relatively low values of the standard deviation demonstrate the small difference between the experimental and predicted values and also confirm the validity of the acquired models.

3.4. Characterization of Optimized Activated Carbon

In general, the appearance of pores in the case of AC1 and AC2 activated carbons is due to the decomposition of the sample matrix by the activating agent (H3PO4), followed by the removal of tars during heat treatment under nitrogen atmosphere (Figure 3). These observations allowed us to conclude that the texture of the activated carbons obtained is favorable for applications in the removal of heavy metals.
Surface functional groups have an important influence on adsorption processes. These functional groups are mainly subdivided into acidic or basic groups, affecting the surface charge of the adsorbent and, as a result, the efficiency of adsorption [59,60]. Boehm titration was used for the activated carbons to quantify acidic functional groups; the results are reported in Table 4. Based on the obtained results, it can be seen that both of the obtained activated carbon surfaces have mainly acidic groups due to the existence of carboxylic, phenolic, and lactonic groups, and a lower number of basic groups.
These results indicate a higher adsorption performance of activated carbon for metal ions. The pHPZC values of the adsorbents were 6.8 and 5.8 for AC1 and AC2, respectively, indicating their relatively acidic nature. This is in accordance with the result of the Boehm titration, which indicates a dominance of acid groups on the surface of the activated carbon.
Nitrogen (N2) gas adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples were performed to investigate their porous characteristics. The obtained activated carbons had large specific surface areas SBET equal to 551 m2 g−1 and 404 m2 g−1 for AC1 and AC2, respectively.

3.5. Adsorption Study: Effect of pH, Adsorbent Dose, Time, and Initial Metal Concentrations

For the effect of pH of solution, metal ion distributions were determined using Visual MINTEQ (V 3.1). The proportion of metal ion species was calculated at 0.001 M ionic strength at 30 °C by adjusting the pH. The results demonstrate that the only ionic species present in the solution are Cd2+ or Pb2+ for a pH < 7 (Figure 4). On the other hand, for pH > 7, it was evident that precipitation has the main effect on the removal of Cd2+ or Pb2+, corresponding to the formation of Cd(OH)2 or Pb(OH)2 precipitates. Therefore, in the present work, all tests were performed at pH ≤ 7.0. These results are also confirmed by other previous work [61]. The variation in adsorption capacity in this pH range is mainly due to the influence of pH on the surface adsorption characteristics of the adsorbent [38].
An increase in removal efficiency was observed with increasing pH values. The maximum removal capacity of Pb2+ was 172.5 mg g−1and 186.8 mg g−1 for Cd2+ at pH 6 (Figure 5a). A decrease in removal efficiency was found at low pH values (1–3) due to the high protonation process, which leads to the accumulation of positive charges on the surface layer of the adsorbent, resulting in electrostatic repulsion between the positive metal ions and the positively charged surface of the activated carbon. The possible mechanism reactions that could occur are represented by the following equations [62].
2   A C S u r f a c e C O H 2 2 + + M + A C S u r f a c e C O M 2 + + 2 H +
2   A C S u r f a c e C O H + M + A C S u r f a c e ( C O 2 ) M + + 2 H +
where M = metal ion of Cd or Pb and ACSurface = surface of the activated carbon.
As the pH increased, there was a reduction in positive charges, and thus the adsorption sites became available and subsequently, the adsorption of metal ions increased; these results are in agreement with those found in previous research [63,64].For the study of the effect of adsorbent dose, as shown in Figure 5b, there was an increase in metal ion (Cd or Pb) removal whenever there was an increase in adsorbent dose from 0.2 to 1 g L−1.This can be expected because with a higher dose of adsorbent in the solution, there is greater availability of exchangeable sites for the metal ions [65]. Beyond an adsorbent dose of 1 g L−1, the metal ion removal remains unchanged. In this way, an adsorbent dose of 1 g L−1 was chosen as the optimal dose.
In order to establish the contact time required to reach the equilibrium adsorption of a pollutant on activated carbon, it is necessary to follow the adsorption kinetics of metal ions in aqueous solution on the optimized activated carbon. The adsorption of the Cd2+ and Pb2+ increased as the contact time varied from 0 to 720 min before becoming constant after 240 min (Figure 5c). The investigation of the effect of the initial concentrations of the metal ions shows that the adsorbed quantities of Pb2+ and Cd2+ increase significantly with the increase in the initial concentration (Figure 5d). According to the literature [66], this increase is mainly due to the fact that in the presence of a high concentration of Cd2+ and Pb2+, the diffusion forces of the solute to the pores become significantly higher, thus promoting the retention of metal ions.

3.6. Regeneration Study

Metal desorption studies are useful for adsorbent recycling and metal resource recovery. The results of the multiple cyclic adsorption/desorption tests are presented in Figure 6.
The adsorption capacities of AC2 for Cd2+ and Pb2+werereduced from 180.5 and 166.3 mg g−1 to 163.3 to 147.8 mg g−1, respectively (decreases of 7% and 9% of efficiency between the first and fifth cycles, respectively, for Cd and Pb). This demonstrates that the surface sites occupied by the metal ions could be recovered by acid treatment (Figure 7a), and as previously proven in the study of the effect of pH, adsorption is favored at pH between 3 and 7 (Figure 7b) and precipitation is favored at pH above 7 (Figure 7c). In acidic medium, H+ ions substitute for metal ions through ion exchange, thus promoting the phenomenon of metal ion desorption. In addition, hydrochloric acid is commonly used to desorb these ions from adsorbents in industrial production, presenting a relatively low cost [67]. The results show that the adsorbent exhibits excellent regeneration performance and high adsorption capacity after five cycles, proving its excellent potential for the treatment of wastewater containing metal ions.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that activated carbon synthesized from prickly pear seed cake is suitable for heavy metal removal from industrial wastewater. The operating conditions and the use of phosphoric acid as an activating agent were optimized using the experimental design methodology and the results were processed with the DesignExpert software 11.1.2.2.0. The optimal response corresponding to a maximum MB index and iodine number (395.49 mg g−1 and 2527.30 mg g−1, respectively) was obtained when the Tc, impregnation ratio, Ta, and activation time were set to 500 °C, 2:1 (g H3PO4/g carbon), 500 °C, and 2 h, respectively. At a Tc of 600 °C, a mass activation ratio of 2:1 (g H3PO4/g carbon), an activation temperature of 400 °C, and an activation time of one hour, the maximum adsorption of heavy metals was reached, with 170.2 and 158.4 mg g−1 for Cd2+ and Pb2+, respectively. The activated carbons with the most developed porosities (AC1), and the most adsorbent power (AC2) with respect to Cd2+ and Pb2+, were selected for subsequent analysis using different analysis techniques. Scanning electron microscopy showed that a very porous surface was developed. The chemical characteristics of Boehm titration and pH of zero charge showed the presence of carboxylic, phenolic, and lactonic groups on the surface of the activated carbons and their acidic character.
The adsorption experiments indicate that the adsorption equilibrium was achieved in about 240 min, and the optimum adsorbent was found to be 1 g L−1. Maximum adsorption occurred at pH 6. The desorption studies showed that the adsorbent exhibits excellent regeneration performance and high adsorption capacity after five cycles. The results of this study focus on the valorization of prickly pear seed cake to reduce environmental pollution and preserve natural resources. In this way, researchers are encouraged to undertake more in-depth studies in this field.

Author Contributions

R.D. and M.Y. were involved in planning the work and processing the experimental data. L.M. and F.A. performed the analysis and designed the figures. A.K.D.A. and R.b.S. aided in interpreting the results. Y.M. and R.D. designed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Deanship at the University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, through project number RG-191251.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Deanship at the University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, through project number RG-191251.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Little, I.; Alorkpa, E.; Khan, V.; Povazhnyi, V.; Vasiliev, A. Efficient porous adsorbent for removal of cesium from contaminated water. J. Porous Mater. 2019, 26, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, J.; Hou, B.; Wang, J.; Tian, B.; Bi, J.; Wang, N.; Li, X.; Huang, X. Nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Taleb, F.; Ben Mosbah, M.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Adsorption of ibuprofen sodium salt onto Amberlite resin IRN-78: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic investigations. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Michail, C.; Koukou, V.; Martini, N.; Saatsakis, G.; Kalyvas, N.; Bakas, A.; Kandarakis, I.; Fountos, G.; Panayiotakis, G.; Valais, I. Luminescence Efficiency of Cadmium Tungstate. Crystals 2020, 10, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Runtti, H.; Tuomikoski, S.; Kangas, T.; Lassi, U.; Kuokkanen, T.; Rämö, J. Chemically activated carbon residue from biomass gasification as a sorbent for iron(II), copper(II) and nickel(II) ions. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, S.; Huang, J.H.; Zhang, W.; Shi, L.X.; Yi, K.X.; Yu, H.B.; Zhang, C.Y.; Li, S.Z.; Li, J.N. Microplastics as a vehicle of heavy metals in aquatic environments: A review of adsorption factors, mechanisms, and biological effects. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 302, 113995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ayati, A.; Tanhaei, B.; Sillanpää, M. Lead (II)-ion removal by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ligand functionalized magnetic chitosan–aluminum oxide–iron oxide nanoadsorbents and microadsorbents: Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tepanosyan, G.; Sahakyan, L.; Belyaeva, O.; Asmaryan, S.; Saghatelyan, A. Continuous impact of mining activities on soil heavy metals levels and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Munir, N.; Jahangeer, M.; Bouyahya, A.; El Omari, N.; Ghchime, R.; Balahbib, A.; Aboulaghras, S.; Mahmood, Z.; Akram, M.; Shah, S.M.A.; et al. Heavy Metal Contamination of Natural Foods Is a Serious Health Issue: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adam, A.M.; Saad, H.A.; Atta, A.A.; Alsawat, M.; Hegab, M.S.; Altalhi, T.A.; Refat, M.S. An Environmentally friendly method for removing Hg (II), Pb (II), Cd (II) and Sn (II) Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Novel Metal—Carbon-Based Composites. Crystals 2021, 11, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, J.; Liu, L.; Yang, F. A WO3/PPy/ACF modified electrode in electrochemical system for simultaneous removal of heavy metal ion Cu2+ and organic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 394, 122534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, X.; Liu, C. Efficient removal of heavy metal ions based on the optimized dissolution-diffusion-flow forward osmosis process. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Corroto, C.; Iriel, A.; Cirelli, A.F.; Carrera, A.L.P. Constructed wetlands as an alternative for arsenic removal from reverse osmosis effluent. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 691, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, Y.; Zhou, S.; Pan, S.Y.; Zhu, S.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, H. Performance evaluation and optimization of flocculation process for removing heavy metal. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, J.; Huang, Z.L.; Zhou, J.X.; Li, C.Z.; Yang, Z.H.; Ruan, M.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.J.; Qin, X.L.; et al. Enhancement of heavy metals removal by microbial flocculant produced by Paenibacilluspolymyxa combined with an insufficient hydroxide precipitation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 374, 880–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Serrano, L.Z.; Lara, N.O.; Vera, R.R.; Cholico-González, D. Removal of Fe(III), Cd(II), and Zn(II) as Hydroxides by Precipitation–Flotation System. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Calabrò, P.S.; Bilardi, S.; Moraci, N. Advancements in the use of filtration materials for the removal of heavy metals from multicontaminated solutions. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2021, 20, 100241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tavakoli, O.; Goodarzi, V.; Saeb, M.R.; Mahmoodi, N.M.; Borja, R. Competitive removal of heavy metal ions from squid oil under isothermal condition by CR11 chelate ion exchanger. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 334, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bashir, A.; Malik, L.A.; Ahad, S.; Manzoor, T.; Bhat, M.A.; Dar, G.N.; Pandith, A.H. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous system by ion-exchange and biosorption methods. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 729–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Araissi, M.; Ayed, I.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Removal of barium and strontium from aqueous solution using zeolite 4A. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. El-Maguana, N.; Elhadiri, M.; Bouchdoug, M.; Benchanaa, A.J. Activated Carbon from Prickly Pear Seed Cake: Optimization of Preparation Conditions Using Experimental Design and Its Application in Dye Removal. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 12, 8621951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Senani, G.M.; Al-Fawzan, F.F. Adsorption study of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by nanoparticle of wild herbs. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2018, 44, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, H.M.; Lee, B.H.; An, K.H.; Park, S.J.; Kim, B.J. Facile preparation of activated carbon with optimal pore range for high butane working capacity. Carbon Lett. 2020, 30, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, L.; Shang, Z.; Wang, H. Production of activated carbon from walnut shell by CO2 activation in a fluidized bed reactor and its adsorption performance of copper ion. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018, 20, 1676–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shahrokhi-Shahraki, R.; Benally, C.; El-Din, M.G.; Park, J. High efficiency removal of heavy metals using tire-derived activated carbon vs. commercial activated carbon: Insights into the adsorption mechanisms. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Minh, T.D.; Lee, B.K. Effects of functionality and textural characteristics on the removal of Cd (II) by ammoniated and chlorinated nanoporous activated carbon. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2017, 19, 1022–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alvarez, J.; Lopez, G.; Amutio, M.; Bilbao, J.; Olazar, M. Bio-oil production from rice husk fast pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Fuel 2014, 128, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Idrees, M.; Batool, S.; Kalsoom, T.; Yasmeen, S.; Kalsoom, A.; Raina, S.; Zhuang, Q.; Kong, J. Animal manure-derived biochars produced via fast pyrolysis for the removal of divalent copper from aqueous media. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 213, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lam, S.S.; Liew, R.K.; Cheng, C.K.; Rasit, N.; Ooi, C.K.; Ma, N.L.; Ng, J.H.; Lam, W.H.; Chong, C.T.; Chase, H.A. Pyrolysis production of fruit peel biochar for potential use in treatment of palm oil mill effluent. J. Environ. Manage. 2018, 213, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhelipan, M.; Arunchander, A.; Sahu, A.K.; Kalpana, D. Activated carbon from orange peels as supercapacitor electrode and catalyst support for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khadhri, N.; Saad, M.K.; Ben Mosbah, M.; Moussaoui, Y. Batch and continuous column adsorption of indigo carmine onto activated carbon derived from date palm petiole. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elhleli, H.; Mannai, F.; Ben Mosbah, M.; Khiari, R.; Moussaoui, Y. Biocarbon Derived from Opuntia ficus indica for p-Nitrophenol Retention. Processes 2020, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saad, M.K.; Khiari, R.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Adsorption of anthracene using activated carbon and Posidonia oceanica. Arab. J. Chem. 2014, 7, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ramadan, M.F.; Mörsel, J.-T. Oil cactus pear (Opuntia ficus L.). Food Chem. 2003, 82, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Habibi, Y.; Heux, L.; Mahrouz, M.; Vignon, M.R. Morphological and structural study of seed pericarp of Opuntia ficus-indica prickly pear fruits. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 72, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amari, A.; Alalwan, B.; Eldirderi, M.M.; Mnif, W.; Rebah, F.B. Cactus material-based adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals and dyes: A review. Mater. Res. Express. 2019, 7, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liosis, C.; Papadopoulou, A.; Karvelas, E.; Karakasidis, T.E.; Sarris, I.E. Heavy Metal Adsorption Using Magnetic Nanoparticles for Water Purification: A Critical Review. Materials 2021, 14, 7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shimada, M.; Iida, T.; Kawarada, K. Pore structure and adsorption properties of activated carbon prepared from granular molded waste paper. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2004, 6, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Zuo, S.; Miao, M.; Liu, Y.; Gu, Z.; Jin, Y. Cost-effective preparation of metal-free electrocatalysts by phosphoric acid activation of lignocellulosic materials for oxygen reduction reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 2811–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, H.M.; Zhang, D.H.; Chen, Y.; Ran, M.J.; Gu, J.C. Study on the application of KOH to produce activated carbon to realize the utilization of distiller’s grains. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 69, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Üner, O.; Geçgel, Ü.; Bayrak, Y. Preparation and characterization of mesoporous activated carbons from waste watermelon rind by using the chemical activation method with zinc chloride. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 3621–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Saad, S.; Dávila, I.; Mannai, F.; Labidi, J.; Moussaoui, Y. Effect of the autohydrolysis treatment on the integral revalorisation of Ziziphus lotus. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. M’barek, I.; Slimi, H.; AlSukaibi, A.K.D.; Alimi, F.; Lajimi, R.H.; Mechi, L.; ben Salem, R.; Moussaoui, Y. Cellulose from Tamarixaphylla’s stem via acetocell for cadmium adsorption. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Azizi, C.; Hammi, H.; Chaouch, M.A.; Majdoub, H.; Mnif, A. Use of Tunisian Opuntia ficus-indica Cladodes as a Low Cost Renewable Admixture in Cement Mortar Preparations. Chem. Africa 2019, 2, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mannai, F.; Ammar, M.; Yanez, J.G.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Cellulose fiber from Tunisian Barbary Fig “Opuntia ficusindica” for papermaking. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2061–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferhi, F.; Das, S.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y.; Yanez, J.G. Chemical characterisation and suitability for papermaking applications studied on four species naturally growing in Tunisia. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 61, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wise, L.; Murphy, E.; Addieco, M.A.A. Cloriteholocellulose: Its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Paper Trade J. 1946, 122, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  49. Karoui, S.; Ben Arfi, R.; Mougin, K.; Ghorbal, A.; Assadi, A.A.; Amrane, A. Synthesis of novel biocomposite powder for simultaneous removal of hazardous ciprofloxacin and methylene blue: Central composite design, kinetic and isotherm studies using Brouers-Sotolongo family models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 121675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Machrouhi, A.; Alilou, H.; Farnane, M.; El Hamidi, S.; Sadiq, M.; Abdennouri, M.; Tounsadi, H.; Barka, N. Statistical optimization of activated carbon from Thapsiatranstagana stems and dyes removal efficiency using central composite design. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2019, 4, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, X.; Ran, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, C. Extremely efficient and rapidly adsorb methylene blue using porous adsorbent prepared from waste paper: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Newcombe, G.; Hayes, R.; Drikas, M. Granular activated carbon: Importance of surface properties in the adsorption of naturally occurring organics. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1993, 78, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Masmoudi, M.; Baccouche, A.; Borchani, M.; Besbes, S.; Blecker, C.; Attia, H. Physico-chemical and antioxidant properties of oils and by-products obtained by cold press-extraction of Tunisian Opuntia spp. seeds. Appl. Food Res. 2021, 1, 100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moussaoui, Y.; Ferhi, F.; Elaloui, E.; Bensalem, R.; Belgacem, M.N. Utilization of Astragalus armatus Roots in papermaking applications. BioResources 2011, 6, 4969–4978. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang, Y.; Cannon, F.S. Biomass activated carbon derived from pine sawdust with steam bursting pretreatment; perfluorooctanoic acid and methylene blue adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Duan, D.; Chen, D.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, G.; Zhang, W.; Lei, H.; Ruan, R. Activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass as catalyst: A review of the applications in fast pyrolysis process. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 158, 105246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ibrahim, M.; Souleiman, M.; Salloum, A. Methylene blue dye adsorption onto activated carbon developed from Calicotomevillosa via H3PO4 activation. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khalili, S.; Khoshandam, B.; Jahanshahi, M. Optimization of production conditions for synthesis of chemically activated carbon produced from pine cone using response surface methodology for CO2 adsorption. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 94115–94129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saad, M.K.; Mnasri, N.; Mhamdi, M.; Chafik, T.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Removal of methylene blue onto mineral matrices. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 56, 2773–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kathiravan, D.; Huang, B.R.; Saravanan, A. Surface modified highly porous egg-shell membrane derived granular activated carbon coated on paper substrate and its humidity sensing properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 277, 125486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Al-Onazi, W.A.; Ali, M.H.H.; Al-Garni, T. Using pomegranate peel and date pit activated carbon for the removal of cadmium and lead ions from aqueous solution. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5514118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Srivastava, V.C.; Mall, I.D.; Mishra, I.M. Adsorption of toxic metal ions onto activated carbon: Study of sorption behaviour through characterization and kinetics. Chem. Eng. Processing Process Intensif. 2008, 47, 1269–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kobya, M.; Demirbas, E.; Senturk, E.; Ince, M. Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from apricot stone. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 1518–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kavand, M.; Eslami, P.; Razeh, L. The adsorption of cadmium and lead ions from the synthesis wastewater with the activated carbon: Optimization of the single and binary systems. J. Water Process. Eng. 2020, 34, 101151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Üçer, A.; Uyanik, A.; Aygün, Ş. Adsorption of Cu (II), Cd (II), Zn (II), Mn (II) and Fe (III) ions by tannic acid immobilised activated carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 47, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, X.; Wanc, Y.; Zheng, Y.; He, F.; Yu, Z.; Huang, J.; Wangh, H.; Ok, Y.S.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, B. Surface functional groups of carbon-based adsorbents and their roles in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 608–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Enshirah, D.; Awatif, A. Regeneration of spent activated carbon obtained from home filtration system and applying it for heavy metals adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3091–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface response plots for the responses (a) MB index and (b) IN.
Figure 1. Surface response plots for the responses (a) MB index and (b) IN.
Sustainability 14 03245 g001aSustainability 14 03245 g001b
Figure 2. Surface responses plot for the responses (a) Cd removal and (b) Pb removal.
Figure 2. Surface responses plot for the responses (a) Cd removal and (b) Pb removal.
Sustainability 14 03245 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) AC1 carbonized at 500 °C, activated at 500 °C/2 h/2 (g H3PO4/g carbon) and (b) AC2 carbonized at 600 °C, activated at 400 °C/1 h/2 (g H3PO4/g carbon).
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) AC1 carbonized at 500 °C, activated at 500 °C/2 h/2 (g H3PO4/g carbon) and (b) AC2 carbonized at 600 °C, activated at 400 °C/1 h/2 (g H3PO4/g carbon).
Sustainability 14 03245 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of ions in the aqueous system as a function of pH: (a) cadmium groups, (b) lead groups.
Figure 4. Distribution of ions in the aqueous system as a function of pH: (a) cadmium groups, (b) lead groups.
Sustainability 14 03245 g004aSustainability 14 03245 g004b
Figure 5. Effect of (a) pH of solution, (b) adsorbent dose, (c) time, and (d) initial concentration on the adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ on the optimized activated carbon AC2.
Figure 5. Effect of (a) pH of solution, (b) adsorbent dose, (c) time, and (d) initial concentration on the adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ on the optimized activated carbon AC2.
Sustainability 14 03245 g005aSustainability 14 03245 g005b
Figure 6. Regeneration cycles of the activated carbon.
Figure 6. Regeneration cycles of the activated carbon.
Sustainability 14 03245 g006
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism of adsorption/desorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) on activated carbon: (a) pH < 3, (b)3 < pH < 7, (c) 7 < pH < 12.
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism of adsorption/desorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) on activated carbon: (a) pH < 3, (b)3 < pH < 7, (c) 7 < pH < 12.
Sustainability 14 03245 g007
Table 1. Chemical composition of prickly pear seed cake compared with other types of biomass.
Table 1. Chemical composition of prickly pear seed cake compared with other types of biomass.
BiomassAshLigninHolocelluloseCellulose
Prickly pear seed cake (this work)1.219.259.434.2
Prickly pear seed cake [53]1.518.757.131.0
Opuntia ficus-indica [46]5.54.864.553.6
Astragalus armatus [54]3.016.754.035.0
Pituranthos chloranthus [47]5.017.661.946.6
Retama raetam [47]3.520.558.736.0
Tamarix aphylla [44]3.530.050.039.0
Table 2. Factorial experimental design matrix.
Table 2. Factorial experimental design matrix.
SchemeCoded ValuesActual ValuesResponses (mg/g)
TcIRTatTcIRTatMB Index (mg g1)IN(mg g1)Cd Removal (mg g1)Pb Removal (mg g1)
1−1−1−1−150014001387.3662348.4100.693.4
21−1−1−160014001383.1452322.6151.6108.6
3−11−1−150024001393.5412496.6105.0131.5
411−1−160024001389.1322489.2170.2158.4
5−1−11−150015001390.2122355.993.4107.2
61−11−160015001387.1122311.7131.6129.4
7−111−150025001394.0552499.499.4136.3
8111−160025001392.8742481.3136.4148.6
9−1−1−1150014002385.9852462.690.292.6
101−1−1160014002380.412332.2118.8119.6
11−11−1150024002394.3122525.380.8108.9
1211−1160024002391.7452517.7119.8122.8
13−1−11150015002388.4772421.985.684.3
141−11160015002390.3322403.8116.4101.6
15−111150025002396.5872527.3107.498.6
16111160025002391.3122522.3117.0118.6
Table 3. Analysis of variance for the responses.
Table 3. Analysis of variance for the responses.
SourceSum of SquaresDfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value Prob>F
MB index
Model252.94550.5921.16<0.0001Significant
Tc37.43137.4315.660.0027
IR159.511159.5166.72<0.0001
Ta40.08140.0816.770.0022
(Tc_Ta)5.1415.142.150.1732
(IR_Ta)10.77110.774.510.0597
Residual23.91102.39
Cor Total276.8515
R2 = 0.9136; R2adj = 0.870
R2pred = 0.778; Std. Dev. = 1.55
IN
Model93,695.34518,739.0743.40<0.0001Significant
Tc4115.2214115.229.530.0115
IR75,625.00175,625.00175.15<0.0001
t10,404.00110,404.0024.100.0006
(Tc_IR)2034.0112034.014.710.0551
(IR_t)1517.1011517.103.510.0903
Residual4317.8410431.78
Cor Total98,013.1815
R2 = 0.955; R2adj = 0.933
R2pred = 0.887; Std. Dev. = 20.78
Cdremoval
Model8365.4761394.2524.77<0.0001Significant
Tc5602.5215602.5299.54<0.0001
Ta155.001155.002.750.1314
t1447.8011447.8025.720.0007
(Tc_Ta)290.701290.705.160.0492
(Tc_t)434.721434.727.720.0214
(Ta_t)434.721434.727.720.0214
Residual506.56956.28
Cor Total8872.0415
R2 = 0.942; R2adj = 0.904
R2pred = 0.819; Std. Dev. = 7.50
Pbremoval
Model5869.6441467.4125.08<0.0001Significant
Tc1497.6911497.6925.600.0004
IR2185.5612185.5637.36<0.0001
t1730.5611730.5629.580.0002
(IR_t)455.821455.827.790.0175
Residual643.481158.50
Cor Total6513.1115
R2 = 0.901; R2adj = 0.865
R2pred = 0.791; Std. Dev. = 7.65
Table 4. Characterizations of studied activated carbons.
Table 4. Characterizations of studied activated carbons.
Activated CarbonAC1AC2
Carboxylic groups (mmol g−1)10.7715.69
Lactonic groups (mmol g−1)1.191.99
Phenolic groups (mmol g−1)1.745.22
Total basic groups (mmol g−1)10.6614
pHPZC6.85.8
SBET (m2 g−1)551404
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dhahri, R.; Yılmaz, M.; Mechi, L.; Alsukaibi, A.K.D.; Alimi, F.; ben Salem, R.; Moussaoui, Y. Optimization of the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Prickly Pear Seed Cake for the Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063245

AMA Style

Dhahri R, Yılmaz M, Mechi L, Alsukaibi AKD, Alimi F, ben Salem R, Moussaoui Y. Optimization of the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Prickly Pear Seed Cake for the Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution. Sustainability. 2022; 14(6):3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063245

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dhahri, Rimene, Murat Yılmaz, Lassaad Mechi, Abdulmohsen Khalaf Dhahi Alsukaibi, Fathi Alimi, Ridha ben Salem, and Younes Moussaoui. 2022. "Optimization of the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Prickly Pear Seed Cake for the Removal of Lead and Cadmium Ions from Aqueous Solution" Sustainability 14, no. 6: 3245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063245

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop