# Correlation Analysis on Accident Injury and Risky Behavior of Vulnerable Road Users Based on Bayesian General Ordinal Logit Model

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Data Source

#### 2.2. The General Ordinal Logit/Probit Model

## 3. Descriptive Statistics and Classification

#### 3.1. Accident Classification

#### 3.2. Classification and Reconstruction of Typical Risky Scenarios

## 4. Modelling Statistical Analysis

## 5. Discussion

## 6. Conclusions

- According to the statistics on illegal behaviors of pedestrians and non-motorized cyclists, the main risky behaviors leading to accidents are the violation of traffic lights, riding against traffic, and not walking/riding on the designated road.
- The Bayesian General Ordinal Logit modeling analysis is applied to 168 cases of real accidents, and the effect of different variables on accident injury severity is obtained according to marginal effect analysis. Results indicate that when the driver is middle-aged and the VRU party is riding an e-bicycle, the probability of death in the accident will rise significantly, which highlights the importance of wearing a helmet. Additionally, for young male VRUs, for VRUs undertaking minor responsibility, and for the motor vehicle type being a truck, the probability of death will decrease remarkably.
- The above data analysis results show that accident prevention and injury reduction for VRUs should be implemented. Middle-aged motorists and e-bicycle cyclists should pay more attention to safe driving and accident prevention. Compliance with laws and regulations and wearing helmets for cyclists are more conducive to VRUs to reduce possible injuries.
- Results can provide scenarios for intelligent vehicles to identify illegal/risky behaviors of VRUs, to help prevent and avoid particular scenarios utilizing radar or visual technologies, and eventually reduce the injury severity of VRUs or avoid accidents.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Yuan, Q.; Chen, H. Factor comparison of passenger-vehicle to vulnerable road user crashes in Beijing, China. Int. J. Crashworthiness
**2017**, 22, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shen, Z.; Ji, W.; Yu, S.; Cheng, G.; Yuan, Q.; Han, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, T. Mapping the knowledge of traffic collision Reconstruction: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and SciMAT. Sci. Justice
**2023**, 63, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Li, P.; Gao, W. Characteristics and Mechanism of Fatal Traffic Accidents Involving Pedestrians:Based on 181 In-depth Investigated Cases. J. Transp. Inf. Saf.
**2018**, 36, 16–23. [Google Scholar] - Tan, Z.; Che, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, J. Trace Analysis for the Typical Precrash Scenario between Car Vehicle and Pedestrian caused by the Automatic Driving. J. Saf. Environ.
**2021**, 21, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar] - Dong, A.; Wang, C.; Qin, D.; Zhu, T.; Xu, T. Analysis on Injury Severity of Pedestrian in Motor Vehicle-pedestrian Accidents. China Saf. Sci. J.
**2020**, 30, 141–147. [Google Scholar] - Šarić, Ž.; Xu, X.; Xiao, D.; Vrkljan, J. Exploring injury severity of pedestrian-vehicle crashes at intersections: Unbalanced panel mixed ordered probit model. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.
**2021**, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bajada, T.; Attard, M. A typological and spatial analysis of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in Malta. Res. Transp. Econ.
**2021**, 86, 101023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Natarajan, P.; Sivasankaran, S.K.; Balasubramanian, V. Identification of Contributing Factors in Vehicle Pedestrian Crashes in Chennai using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Transp. Res. Procedia
**2020**, 48, 3486–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chowdhury, T.; Rifaat, S.M.; Tay, R. Characteristics of Pedestrians in Bangladesh Who Did Not Receive Public Education on Road Safety. Sustainability
**2022**, 14, 9909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, L.; Aghaabbasi, M.; Ali, M.; Jan, A.; Bouallegue, B.; Javed, M.F.; Salem, N.M. Comparative Analysis of the Optimized KNN, SVM, and Ensemble DT Models Using Bayesian Optimization for Predicting Pedestrian Fatalities: An Advance towards Realizing the Sustainable Safety of Pedestrians. Sustainability
**2022**, 14, 10467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cordovez, S.; Ortiz-Prado, E.; Vasconez, E.; Andrade, F.; Simbaña-Rivera, K.; Gómez-Barreno, L.; McIlroy, R. Bicycling-Related Mortality in Ecuador: A Nationwide Population-Based Analysis from 2004 to 2017. Sustainability
**2021**, 13, 5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Han, D.; Ma, Z.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, Y. Car-cyclist Accident Scene Analysis for Autopilot Vehicles. J. Automot. Saf. Energy
**2020**, 11, 220–226. [Google Scholar] - Han, Y.; Li, Q.; He, W.; Wang, B. Analysis of Cyclist’s Kinematic Response in Vehicle Collision Based on Video Information. J. Automot. Saf. Energy
**2017**, 8, 381–387. [Google Scholar] - Helmer, T.; Kates, R. Accidents with vulnerable road users in Germany: Current trends and characteristics of vehicle-cyclist accidents. In Proceedings of the 19th Inttelligent Transportation Systems World Congress, Vienna, Austria, 22–26 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Matsui, Y.; Oikawa, S. Features of Fatal Cyclist Injuries in Vehicle-Versus-Cyclist Accidents in Japan. In Proceedings of the SAE 2015 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 21–23 April 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertach, P.; Uhr, A.; Niemann, S.; Cavegn, M. Characteristics of single-vehicle crashes with e-bikes in Switzerland. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2018**, 117, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, L.; Fang, S.; Huang, J.; Chen, Q. In-depth analysis on cycle-vehicle crash accident based on logistic regression. Automot. Eng.
**2016**, 38, 1288–1293. [Google Scholar] - Jin, N.; Li, G.; Yang, J. A Study of Fatality Risk and Head Dynamic Response of Cyclist and Pedestrian Based on Passenger Car Accident Data Analysis and Simulations. J. Crash Prev. Inj. Control
**2015**, 16, 76–83. [Google Scholar] - Yuan, Q.; Yang, H.; Huang, J.; Kou, S.; Li, Y.; Theofilatos, A. What factors impact injury severity of vehicle to electric bike crashes in China? Adv. Mech. Eng.
**2017**, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Retallack, A.E.; Ostendorf, B. Relationship Between Traffic Volume and Accident Frequency at Intersections. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
**2020**, 17, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Marzoug, R.; Lakouari, N.; Ez-Zahraouy, H.; Téllez, B.C.; Villalobos, L.C. Modeling and simulation of car accidents at a signalized intersection using cellular automata. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl.
**2022**, 589, 126599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yasmin, S.; Eluru, N.; Bhat, C.R.; Tay, R. A latent segmentation based generalized ordered logit model to examine factors influencing driver injury severity. Anal. Methods Accid. Res.
**2014**, 1, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zeng, Q.; Gu, W.; Zhang, X.; Wen, H.; Lee, J.; Hao, W. Analyzing freeway crash severity using a Bayesian spatial generalized ordered logit model with conditional autoregressive priors. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2019**, 127, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Eluru, N.; Bhat, C.R.; Hensher, D.A. A mixed generalized ordered response model for examining pedestrian and bicyclist injury severity level in traffic crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2008**, 40, 1033–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - Yuan, Q.; Xu, X.; Xu, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y. The role of striking and struck vehicles in side crashes between vehicles: Bayesian bivariate probit analysis in China. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2020**, 134, 105324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Guo, Y.; Li, Z.; Wu, Y.; Xu, C. Exploring unobserved heterogeneity in bicyclists’ red-light running behaviors at different crossing facilities. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2018**, 115, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, Y.; Osama, A.; Sayed, T. A cross-comparison of different techniques for modeling macro-level cyclist crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2018**, 113, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ababneh, D.; Ritchie, H.; Webster, W.S. Antidepressants Cause Bradycardia and Heart Block in GD 13 Rat Embryos In Vitro. Birth Defects Res. Part B Dev. Reprod. Toxicol.
**2012**, 95, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jima, D.; Sipos, T. The Impact of Road Geometric Formation on Traffic Crash and Its Severity Level. Sustainability
**2022**, 14, 8475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qu, D.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, K. Crosswalk Safety Warning System for Pedestrians to Cross the Street Intelligently. Sustainability
**2022**, 14, 10223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shao, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S. Electric Bicycle Lane-Changing Behavior under Strategy Games. Sustainability
**2018**, 10, 3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Xu, J.; Shang, S.; Yu, G.; Qi, H.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S. Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents? Accid. Anal. Prev.
**2016**, 87, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Greene, M.A.; Metzler, M.H. Trauma associated with Three and Four-wheeled All-terrain Vehicles. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care
**1988**, 28, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**Figure 1.**Collision scene reconstruction of typical accident scenarios: (

**a**) Riding against traffic; (

**b**) Riding on motorway; (

**c**) Not slowing down while turning; (

**d**) Jaywalking; (

**e**) Walking on motorway.

Variable | Classification | Quantity (n = 378) | Chi-Square Value |
---|---|---|---|

Time | Daytime (7:00–19:00) | 262 (69.31%) | 56.39 |

Nighttime (19:00–7:00) | 116 (30.69%) | ||

Vulnerable road users | Pedestrian | 102 (26.98%) | 80.10 |

Cyclist | 276 (73.02%) | ||

Accident injury severity | Injury | 317 (83.86%) | 173.38 |

Death | 61 (16.14%) | ||

Location | Intersections | 89 (23.55%) | 105.82 |

Others | 289 (76.46%) | ||

Illegal behavior | Yes | 215 (56.88%) | 7.15 |

No | 163 (43.12%) |

Variable | Classification | Number of Pedestrians (n = 102) | Number of Cyclists (n = 276) | Chi-Square Value |
---|---|---|---|---|

Time | Daytime (7:00–19:00) | 72 (19.05%) | 190 (50.26%) | 0.11 |

Nighttime (19:00–7:00) | 30 (7.94%) | 224 (22.75%) | ||

Accident injury severity | Injury | 74 (19.58%) | 243 (64.29%) | 13.21 |

Death | 28 (7.41%) | 33 (8.73%) | ||

Location | Intersections | 17 (4.50%) | 72 (19.25%) | 3.67 |

Others | 85 (22.49%) | 204 (53.97%) | ||

Illegal behavior | Yes | 56 (14.81%) | 159 (42.06%) | 0.22 |

No | 46 (12.17%) | 117 (30.95%) |

Behaviors | Number of Pedestrians (n = 102) | Number of Cyclists (n = 276) |
---|---|---|

Riding against traffic | 33 (8.73%) | |

Not slowing down when turning, or giving way to pedestrians | 13 (3.44%) | |

Not walking/riding on a designated road | 2 (0.53%) | 8 (2.12%) |

Jaywalking | 22 (5.82%) | 14 (3.70%) |

Illegal behavior while walking/riding on the road | 4 (1.06%) | 36 (9.52%) |

Violation of traffic light | 5 (3.78%) | 28 (7.41%) |

Drinking | 0 (0%) | 9 (2.38%) |

Others | 23 (6.08%) | 18 (4.76%) |

Total | 56 (14.81%) | 159 (42.06%) |

Variables | Description and Value |
---|---|

Motor vehicle type (MVT) | |

Coach | Bus (reference item) |

Truck | Truck |

Motorcycle | Motorcycle |

Gender of driver (GD) | 1 for male/0 for female |

Age of driver (AD) | |

AD_young | ≤25 |

AD_mature | 26–45 (reference item) |

AD_middle | 46–55 |

AD_old | >55 |

Vulnerable group (VG) | |

Bicycle | Bicycle |

E-bicycle | E-bicycle |

Pedestrian | Pedestrians (reference item) |

Gender of vulnerable group (GVG) | 1 for male/0 for female |

Age of vulnerable group (AVG) | |

AGV_young | ≤25 |

AGV_mature | 26–45 |

AGV_middle | 46–55 |

AGV_old | >55 (reference item) |

Responsibility (RES) | |

VRU_major | VRU: major and full responsibility |

VRU_minor | VRU: minor responsibility, driver: major responsibility |

VRU_none | VRU: no responsibility, driver: full responsibility (reference item) |

Same | Equal responsibility |

Weekend or workday | 1 for weekend, 0 for workday |

Time of day | |

Before dawn | 0 a.m.–6 a.m. |

Morning | 6 a.m.–12 a.m. (reference item) |

Afternoon | 12 a.m.–6 p.m. |

Evening | 6 p.m.–0 a.m. |

Covariates | Beta Latent Propensity | t-Value | p-Value | Alpha Threshold ${\mathit{\alpha}}_{\mathit{k}}$ [28] | t-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Truck | −5.049 (1.845) ^{a} | 2.736 | <0.01 | −1.216 (0.275) | 4.421 | <0.01 |

AD_middle | 4.921 (2.514) | 1.957 | 0.05 | 0.5979 (0.2327) | 2.569 | 0.01 |

E-bicycle | 4.545 (2.019) | 2.251 | 0.02 | \ | ||

GVG_male | −3.838 (1.461) | 2.626 | 0.01 | −0.4526 (0.1586) | 2.854 | <0.01 |

AVG_young | \ | 0.7186 (0.2887) | 2.489 | 0.01 | ||

VRU_minor | \ | 1.978 (0.9002) | 2.197 | 0.03 |

^{a}: average (standard deviation).

Covariates | Property Loss (%) | Injury (%) | Death (%) |
---|---|---|---|

AD_middle | −3.9 | −36.7 | 40.5 |

AVG_young | 0 | 27.5 | −27.5 |

GVG_male | 5.7 | 25.4 | −31.1 |

VRU_minor | 0 | 28.1 | −28.1 |

E-bicycle | −5.3 | −26.8 | 32.1 |

Truck | 15.9 | 4.1 | −19.9 |

Covariates | Property Loss (%) | Injury (%) | Death (%) |
---|---|---|---|

AD_middle | −5.0 | −49.0 | 44.8 |

AVG_young | 2.5 | 55.1 | −42.5 |

GVG_male | 7.5 | 57.4 | −35.0 |

VRU_minor | −2.5 | 49.6 | −47.3 |

E-bicycle | −5.1 | −32.4 | 62.7 |

Truck | 82.5 | 17.5 | −52.5 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Yuan, Q.; Zhai, X.; Ji, W.; Yang, T.; Yu, Y.; Yu, S.
Correlation Analysis on Accident Injury and Risky Behavior of Vulnerable Road Users Based on Bayesian General Ordinal Logit Model. *Sustainability* **2022**, *14*, 16048.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316048

**AMA Style**

Yuan Q, Zhai X, Ji W, Yang T, Yu Y, Yu S.
Correlation Analysis on Accident Injury and Risky Behavior of Vulnerable Road Users Based on Bayesian General Ordinal Logit Model. *Sustainability*. 2022; 14(23):16048.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316048

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Yuan, Quan, Xianguo Zhai, Wei Ji, Tiantong Yang, Yang Yu, and Shengnan Yu.
2022. "Correlation Analysis on Accident Injury and Risky Behavior of Vulnerable Road Users Based on Bayesian General Ordinal Logit Model" *Sustainability* 14, no. 23: 16048.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316048