# Epistemological Foundations of Complexity Theory

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Towards a Concept of Complexity

## 3. Originating Sources of Complexity

#### 3.1. The Complexity of People

#### 3.2. Intra Systemic Interactions of Complexity

#### 3.3. The Complexity of Organizations

#### 3.4. Complexity of the Supra System

## 4. Towards a Concept of Limit of Meaning

## 5. Recursive Genesis of Complexity

## 6. Complexity Reduction as a Concept

#### Concept Synthesis

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Blaikie, N. Approaches to Social Enquiry, 2nd ed.; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Réka, A.; Barabási, A. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Am. Phys. Soc.
**2002**, 74, 47–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Becerra, G. Luhmann’s Constructivist Epistemology. Programmatic Objectives, Discussion Contexts, and Philosophical Suppositions. Sociología
**2018**, 33, 9–38. [Google Scholar] - Becerra, G.; Castorina, J. Toward a Dialogue Among Constructivist Research Program. Constr. Found.
**2018**, 13, 191–198. [Google Scholar] - Becerra, G. Complex Systems Theory and Social Systems Theory in the controversies of complexity. Convergencia
**2020**, 27, e12148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Luhmann, N. Observaciones de la Modernidad: Racionalidad y Contingencia en la Sociedad Moderna; Editorial Paidos: Barcelona, Spain, 1997; p. 203. [Google Scholar]
- Valenzuela, L. Complexity, globalization and social theory. Polis
**2012**, 31, 499–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Morales, P. Some reflections about the presence of Habermas in the writings of Social Work in Chile. Rumbos TS Un Espacio Crítico Para Reflexión Cienc. Soc.
**2020**, 21, 171–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Senge, P.; Boss, R.; Smith, B.; Roberts, C.; Kleiner, A. The Firth Discipline Fierldook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization, 1st ed.; Dubleday: New York, NY, USA, 2014; 591p. [Google Scholar]
- Schutz, A. El Problema de la Realidad Social, 2nd ed.; Amorrortu Editores: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Luhmann, N. La Sociedad de la Sociedad, 1st ed.; Herder: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lewkow, L. Nation and world society in Niklas Luhmann’s theory and in some of his continuers. Aposta Rev. Cienc. Soc.
**2017**, 72, 202–231. [Google Scholar] - Habermas, J. The Logic of Social Science, 3rd ed.; The MIT Press: Madrid, Spain, 1996; p. 506. [Google Scholar]
- Habermas, J. En la Espiral de la Tecnocracia, 1st ed.; Editorial Trotta: Madrid, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Short, J. Global Metropolitan. Globalizing Cities in a Capitalist World, 1st ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Sarmiento, L. The contemporary Social Policy: Between the accountability and the acculturation. Perspectivas
**2015**, 26, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Walby, S. Complexity theory, systems theory and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philos. Soc. Sci.
**2007**, 37, 449–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Luhmann, N. Sociedad y Sistema: La Ambición de la Teoría; Editorial Paidos: Barcelona, Spain, 1997; p. 144. [Google Scholar]
- Pignouli-Ocampo, S. Double Contingency and Social Order Seen from Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory. Sociológica
**2013**, 78, 7–40. [Google Scholar] - Mosquera, J.; Muñoz, D. A theoretical and methodological view to Niklas Luhnmann work: Between system and environmental. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Soc.
**2012**, 3, 133–146. [Google Scholar] - Farías, I.; Ossandón, J. Observando sistemas. In Nuevas Apropiaciones y Usos de la Teoría de Niklas Luhmann; Editorial Ril: Santiago, Chile, 2006; pp. 365–389. [Google Scholar]
- Habermas, J. Ciencia y Técnica Como Ideología; Tecnos: Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kallemeyn, L.; Hall, J.; Gates, E. Exploring the Relevance of Complexity Theory for Mixed Methods Research. J. Mix. Methods Res.
**2020**, 14, 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Patiño, J.F. Oncología, Caos, Sistemas Complejos Adaptativos Y Estructuras Disipativas. Rev. Colomb. Cancerol.
**2002**, 17, 5–9. [Google Scholar] - Maturana, H.; Varela, F. De Máquinas y Seres Vivos. Autopoiesis: La Organización de lo Vivo, 5th ed.; Editorial Universitaria: Santiago, Chile, 1998; p. 137. [Google Scholar]
- Wallerstein, I. Abrir las ciencias sociales. In Informe de la Comisión Gulbenkian Para la Reestructuración de las Ciencias Sociales; Siglo XXI: Mexico City, Mexico, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Héctor, S.A. The social theory of Niklas Luhmann as methodology diagnosis. Rev. Iberoam. Para Investig. Desarro. Educ.
**2015**, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Orta, M. Contributions of Bob Jessop’s strategic relational approach to analysis of state action. Rev. Pilquen
**2020**, 23, 1–13. [Google Scholar] - García, D. Ética Empresarial. Del Diálogo a la Confianza, 1st ed.; Editorial Trotta: Madrid, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Pignouli-Ocampo, S. Models of Social Irreductibility in the Systemic Theory of Niklas Luhmann. Rev. Española Sociol.
**2012**, 17, 27–48. [Google Scholar] - Yan, J.; Feng, L.; Denisov, A.; Steblyanskaya, A.; Oosterom, J. Correction: Complexity theory for the modern Chinese economy from an information entropy perspective: Modeling of economic efficiency and growth potential. PLoS ONE
**2020**, 15, 0230165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rodriguez, D.; Nafarrate, J. Introducción a la Teoría de la Sociedad de Niklas Luhmann; Editorial Herder/Universidad Iberoamericana: Mexico City, Mexico, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Bustamante, M.; Opazo, P. Hacia un concepto de complejidad: Sistema, organización y empresa. Ser. Doc. Docentes FACE
**2004**, 3, 1–23. [Google Scholar] - Devereux, L.; Melewar, T.; Dinnie, K.; Lange, T. Corporate identity orientation and disorientation: A complexity theory perspective. J. Bus. Res.
**2020**, 109, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abatecola, G.; Surace, A. Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability. Sustainability
**2020**, 12, 10629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Harvey, D. The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pignouli-Ocampo, S. Niklas Luhmann’s Synthetical Model of Communication. Cinta Moebio
**2013**, 47, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Aronson, P. La Teoría de la Complejidad y la Complejidad de la Teoría; Editorial Ciccus: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Fascioli, A. El concepto de sociedad civil en J. Habermas. ACTIO Rev.
**2009**, 11, 33–47. [Google Scholar] - Haynes, P.; Alemna, D. A Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Complexity Theory on Applied Economics. Economies
**2022**, 10, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bunge, M. Las Pseudociencias ¡Vaya Timo! Editorial Laetoli S.L.: Pamplona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gligor, D.; Russo, I.; Maloni, M. Understanding gender differences in logistics innovation: A complexity theory perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**2022**, 246, 108420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Becerra, G.; Amozurrutia, J. Rolando García´s Complex Systems Theory and its relevance to sociocybernetics. J. Sociocybernetics
**2015**, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chu, D. Complexity: Against systems. Theory Biosci.
**2011**, 130, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Minto, A.; Trincanato, E. The Policy and Regulatory Engagement with Corruption: Insights from Complexity Theory. Eur. J. Risk Regul.
**2022**, 13, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sokal, A. Más Allá de las Imposturas Intelectuales, 1st ed.; Paidós: Barcelona, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Luhmann, N. Essays on Self-Reference; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- González, J. La Teoría de la Complejidad. Dyna
**2009**, 76, 203–245. [Google Scholar] - McKinnon, S. Genética Neoliberal. Mitos y Moralejas de la Psicología Evolucionista; Fondo de Cultura Económica: Mexico City, Mexico, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Miao, M.; Go, I.; Kayo, I.; Hideho, N. Brand equity effects on financial performance in Japanese fashion market: Applying complexity theory via fsQCA. J. Glob. Fash. Mark.
**2022**, 13, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Satish, K.; Saumyaranjan, S.; Weng, M.; Sascha, K.; Umesh, B. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
**2022**, 178, 121599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Malaina, A. Le Paradigme de la Complexité et la Sociologie, 1st ed.; L´Harmattan: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Coppo, J. Chaos theory and scientific method. Rev. Vet.
**2010**, 21, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zadeh, L.; Desoer, C. Linear System Theory: The State Space Approach; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 656. [Google Scholar]
- Urry, J. The Complexities of the Global. Dep. Sociol. Lanc. Univ.
**2004**, LA1 4YL, 1–22. [Google Scholar] - Pignouli-Ocampo, S. The concept of alterity inside the discussion between the theoretical frames of device and of communication. Nómadas Rev. Crítica De Cienc. Soc. Y Jurídicas
**2012**, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Jessop, R. El Futuro del Estado Capitalista; Los Libros de la Catarata: Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- González, J. Synchronization and Control of Chaos. An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gouveia, V. Individualism-collectivism as predictors of prejudice toward Gypsies in Spain. Interam. J. Psychol.
**2011**, 45, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cienfuegos, Y.; Saldívar, A.; Díaz, R.; Avalos, A. Individualism and collectivism: Characterization and differences in two Mexican localities. Psychol. Res. Rec.
**2016**, 6, 2534–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hernández, J.; Doncel, R. The Concept of Form of State. From the Parisian Regulation Theory to Jessop’s contribution. Rev. De Estud. Soc. Contemp.
**2020**, 23, 203–216. [Google Scholar] - Bruzco, M. The butterfly effect and its strategic implications in the organization. Rev. Cienc. Estratégicas
**2012**, 20, 39–49. [Google Scholar] - Bohórquez, L. The Butterfly Effect of Social Media and its impact on Public Opinion. The revocation of the mayor of Lima, Peru. Estud. Sobre Mensaje Periodístico
**2019**, 25, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Pearce, B. Increasing Support for Evidence-Based Policing: A Complexity Theory Perspective on Organizational Change. Organ. Improv. Plan West. Univ.
**2022**, 296, 1–153. [Google Scholar] - González, J.; Ávila, R. The Science That Emerges with the Century; Academia: La Habana, Cuba, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.; Yang, X.; Guan, X.; Zhou, L.; Huan, T.-C. Will catering employees’ job dissatisfaction lead to brand sabotage behavior? A study based on conservation of resources and complexity theories. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag.
**2022**, 34, 1882–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vivanco, M. Emergencia: Concepto y método. Cinta moebio
**2014**, 49, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Boyer, R. La ausencia de una teoría alternativa pone en peligro las posibilidades de encontrar una salida a la crisis. Análisis Económico
**2013**, 18, 249–274. [Google Scholar] - Garcia, J. The Butterfly Effect and ‘Ex Nihilo’ Complexity. Ibercampus. 2015. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2723360 (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Ferreyra, M. Estado y mercado en la Teoría de la Regulación. Estudios
**2014**, 31, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Bustamante-Ubilla, M.; Arenas-Torres, F.
Epistemological Foundations of Complexity Theory. *Sustainability* **2022**, *14*, 13316.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013316

**AMA Style**

Bustamante-Ubilla M, Arenas-Torres F.
Epistemological Foundations of Complexity Theory. *Sustainability*. 2022; 14(20):13316.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013316

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Bustamante-Ubilla, Miguel, and Felipe Arenas-Torres.
2022. "Epistemological Foundations of Complexity Theory" *Sustainability* 14, no. 20: 13316.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013316