Next Article in Journal
Can Tanker Water Services Contribute to Sustainable Access to Water? A Systematic Review of Case Studies in Urban Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative and Competitive: A Systematic Literature Review on New Tourism Destinations and Products for Tourism Supply
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Rainfall on Soil Aggregate Breakdown and Transportation on Cultivated Land in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Place Attachment, Cultural Involvement, and Residents’ Attitudes towards Tourism Development: The Case of Novi Sad, the European Capital of Culture 2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Calibrating Evolution of Transformative Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis

1
Doctoral School of Geography, Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Human Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Geography, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Center for Research on Settlements and Urbanism, Babeş-Bolyai University, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 11027; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711027
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 3 September 2022

Abstract

:
Transformative tourism (TT) has been gaining a lot of attention over the past few years due to its power to transform both the individual and the world we live in, in a positive way. Although presently consisting of a plethora of studies, transformative tourism lacks the lens of a bibliometric approach to track its growth in a more objective and quantitative manner. In this article, a total of 250 publications were analysed using several bibliometric performance metrics, science mapping techniques, such as citation analysis, co-occurrence, and co-authorship, as well as enrichment procedures. By combining these methods, the study identifies the most prolific journals, reference studies in the field, key authors, collaboration patterns, geographic distribution, preferred methods, major research topics, as well as an overall research timeline in this area of study. Findings suggest that transformative tourism could become the heart of tourism in the upcoming years as it begins to take deeper roots through new junctions and discoveries, appealing to more researchers and practitioners, with the literature on TT thus gaining momentum. This paper contributes to fill a research gap and capture the evolution of the fast-growing concept of transformative tourism using bibliometric analysis. The article provides useful insights as well as further research directions for both researchers and tourism practitioners interested in this field of study.

1. Introduction

Travel and tourism, representing one of the fastest growing sectors in the world, have long been connected to the idea of transformation [1], considered to be a fertile ground in transformative learning [2] as tourism experiences have the capacity to influence and change people’s lives [3,4] and function as drivers for personal change. Combined, both tourism and transformation can alleviate the problems the world is facing right now, by shifting people’s perspectives and raising their self-awareness, all towards a better future as ”human survival is inextricably linked to human transformation” [5]. The ability of transformation to happen anywhere [6] and anytime due to its pure reliance on the individual [7] and various contextual stimuli [8], rather than a specific type of tourism [9], along with adding up its unquestionable cyclical essence as a process and not as an end outcome [10], augments and attributes a chameleonic nature to transformative tourism.
Mostly built upon Mezirow’s transformative learning theory (1991) theoretical framework [11], the TT concept has shapeshifted over the years as academics continually discovered new facets to it. After the introduction of “transformative travel” in 1998 by Jeffrey Kottler [12], the concept gradually turned into a growth of interest and ramified from a scant amount of tourism types, such as adventure tourism [13], backpacking tourism [14,15], international sojourn [16], dark-tourism [17], and extreme sports [18], with cross-cultural [19,20] to changed beliefs from business tourism not being suitable for transformation [21], to demonstrating its transformative power [22], to even having echoes in mass tourism [23]. Several perspectives were introduced, whereas from relying mainly on a tourist’s point of view [16,24], continued as a co-creative experience including host perspectives [25,26,27] and even organisations [28,29]. TT has zigzagged from its ability to foster transformation only in extraordinary trips and places [30], to experiencing liminality and therefore transformation even in familiar contexts [31]; from happening purposively [7,32,33] to incidental occurrences of transformation [34]; from pointing out a lack of feelings and emotions in Mezirow’s theory [35], to slowly introducing the role of emotions in transformation [36,37,38].
Later research shows a far more elaborated facet to TT as it implies a practical approach. The last three years of studies constitute around 40% of total publications related to the subject and integrate aspects such as the design of the transformative experiences [39,40,41], models of transformation processes [6], analysis of organisational approaches [29,42], creation of a transformative travel experience scale [43], product development [44], identification of facilitators and inhibitors in TT [22], transformative leadership [45] and proven correlation between transformative tourism and improvement of sustainability [46]. The same pattern is followed by the three review publications related to the subject, starting from the transformative learning theory [47], to nature-based experiences [48], and ending with a complex conceptualisation of transformative tourism experiences [49].
The back-and-forth literature exhibits the endless potential of growing the concept of TT. Given the importance of transformative learning on shifting individuals’ mindsets [50] and tourism experiences on changing lives of consumers [3,4], along with Pine and Gilmore’s speculation upon transformation being the next trend on the world-wide scene [51] as a successor to the experience economy [52], scientific advancement in this field of study is conspicuous and therefore requires to be measured. However, to date, a bibliometric approach of published literature on TT has not yet been conducted. Hence, the purpose of this study was to deploy such analysis on papers published in four databases over a period of twenty-four years (1998–2022), to synthesize the tourism literature on transformative tourism as well as to grasp the evolution in this area of study. This paper aimed to respond to the following research questions:
(1)
What are the general characteristics of studies related to TT?
(2)
What is the actual quantitative and objective state of knowledge regarding TT?
(3)
How has the research interest evolved?
In the following section, an overview of the literature has been presented to better understand the basis on which this research has been built upon along with the current state of knowledge on this topic. The next section is dedicated to the research strategies that were used as well as the steps that helped in choosing the sample of articles that were best suited for TT analysis. Results and a discussion of the bibliometric analysis are revealed in Section 4, while the final section concludes the main research lines of the study and presents potential future directions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Tourism and Transformation

Within the context of a gradual shift towards the transformative economy [51] along with the need for change in the world on the road to a more sustainable future, experiences that tend to have transformative outcomes are prone to get an increased importance in the near future [53], and therefore the tourism industry may be the answer to this growing demand, as it has an ace up its sleeve when it comes to selling experiences [54], acting as a tool for inner transformation [39]. The pandemic context has resulted in a number of changes in tourist’s desires, with an increase in mindful, responsible and purpose-meaning travellers [55] that shifted from being keen mostly on hedonic pleasures, towards seeking a path concerning more eudaimonic experiences that can transform tourism consumption in meaningful ways [56,57], by creating a space of learning and growth [8], improving healing, wellbeing, re-establishing social bounds, as well as providing an opportunity for making sense of existential dilemmas [55]. TT is not defined by a specific kind of motivation [58], but rather by an increased particularity of one’s own reality [1], as tourists embarking on the journey have already set certain expectations based on their experiences, different perceptions and current state of knowledge [1]. There is a continuous loop between tourism and transformation, as the first has a well-known position to guide activities that can change people’s lives [3,59] and the latter being seen as an important agent of adaptation and recalibration in the ever-changing nature of tourism [60].
The theoretical basis for many of the research regarding TT is Mezirow’s view upon transformative learning. According to the theory, individuals that find themselves at crossroads need to acquire new meaningful perspectives as they can no longer identify with their sense of self. These perspective shifts that could be gained through the dialogue with others, facilitate forming new concepts, values and assumptions by drawing comparisons and reflect upon one’s life that could ultimately lead to permanent transformation and positive changes in one’s behaviour [11]. Even though initially developed as a new approach to adult learning, it later evolved into a juncture between the theory and tourism [47,48] and began to spread across various tourism contexts, such as cross-cultural [20], volunteer [10], and community-based [26]. These connections were foreseen by Kottler whom also discussed about the same alternative views on life that can ultimately lead to positive changes and personal growth when he first associated the pair of terms” transformative” and” travel” while debating on the transformative travellers’ profile, motivations and the effect of travelling as an approach to heal oneself, often resulted from transforming one’s perspective on life [12]. Nowadays, widely known as transformative tourism, the literature that sprung from these two pillars of TT research continues to undergo improvements, gain new insights, and proliferate as time goes by.

2.2. Transformative Tourism Experience

Often driven by intrinsic motivations of fulfilling one’s true potential [61], transformative experiences are different from mundane activities [62], as are considered to be more-than-human, ongoing and incomplete [63], having the ability to lead towards long-lasting perceptual and behavioural changes [48,64] that may overall improve the quality of life and wellbeing of the individuals [28]. The process of transformative tourism is described through a series of steps [11,56], usually initiated when a ”disorienting dilemma” is triggered, that challenges an individual’s way of thinking and makes one self-reflect on their own biases [65]. These stages are linked to Campbell’s monomyth (1949) known as the hero’s journey [66], where one’s dissatisfied with their own mundane life and embarks on a journey where rules and boundaries are unknown, and the traveller is put through a series of tests that trigger the transformation process by seeing and doing unfamiliar things while getting into social contexts with strangers [9]. After the trials are accomplished, the hero returns home with a new outlook on life and, along with the help of those around him, the newly acquired worldview can be passed on and is believed to last over time [9]. Therefore, it happens when one gets out of their comfort zone [12] and has their value-system challenged [67], by learning to embrace cross-culturalism, understanding [68] and gaining social empowerment [69] that can ultimately serve as a higher purpose of life [70]. These holotropic experiences [71] of transformative tourism aid towards changing the McDonaldization of the world [72].

2.3. Ethos

The mindset of the consumer before embarking on a journey is an aspect to consider when it comes to transformation [1] because as long as the mind is ready and there is openness to change and to acquire new experiences [73], a paratelic state of mind of the consumer is formed [58] where one wants to immerse into the whole experience and thus capitalise on the context conducive to triggering the transformation process. This previously induced state of mind can instigate consumer’s transformation for both those who intentionally search for it [12,74,75] or those who initially have other pre-embarking motivations [23,34] that change under different stimuli and contexts. There is a need for a Ricœurdian ‘ipse’ mentality in which consumers understand the evolution of identity over time and thus remain open to multiple worldviews [23] as their identity may slowly shift and consolidate after experiencing a transformative trip [76]. The thought with which many consumers embark on a journey relates to different personal circumstances as they begin to question the reality they live in as well as the current state they find themselves in [77]. Such circumstances relate to social, physical, professional, and even existential challenges [33] and usually help the individual to develop critical thinking [78] and see problems from new angles when returning home [79].
Transformative tourists can be seen as independent [80], seeker types [81], motivated by a desire to learn and transform [16] themselves and the world around them [82], having the ability to immerse in the experience and have an open mind towards change [1]. There have been only few studies that researched on demographic aspects of the tourists and therefore this area requires more research [8,83]. Gender-wise, the female process of transformation is marked by soft transformations that include bodily sensations and self-consciousness while male experience is included in the hard section, being characterised by flow, adaptation, and a sense of community [84]. There is still a need to further research on the socio-demographic aspects of tourists, such as age, gender, and level of education, but also economic status and their relation to TT.

2.4. Setting

2.4.1. Time

The time provided for activities is also an important variable, as consumers who are not usually constrained by time issues during tourism activities are more open to the process of transformation [58], while on short term trips transformation may fail [85]. However, studies show that this failure is not so much due to a lack of time as to consumers’ inability to fully integrate into the context, because even if trips are longer, if done superficially, transformation is less likely to occur [86], concluding that not all experiences always produce transformation [87], yet further research must be conducted to identify new inhibitors towards transformation in matters of the connection between transformative occurrences and time. The degree of significance attributed by a consumer to an experience determines the difference between temporary and long-term transformation [39]. Thus, to reach the point of successful transformations with permanence over time, a certain level of immersion and intentionality is required for the integration and assimilation of the experience to be performed properly [39].

2.4.2. Destination

Another adjunct in transformation relates to the destinations where consumers choose to spend their time, as places and transformative settings become important in reinforcing the meaning of this process for consumers [55]. Some locations stimulate mindsets of openness to new visions, especially in the context of cultural differences, in the form of culture shock [55]. However, transformative tourism destinations do not have to follow a particular pattern for consumers to access these experiences. Radel and Hillman demonstrate this through their research on journeys of non-arrival [88], as even when tourists do not seek a particular destination [88], relying mainly on the journey itself rather than a destination [89], the trip has been shown to be transformative, as it is all based more on how people feel and think about a particular destination and their commitment to experiencing new ways of thinking.
It has long been discovered that nature and interaction with wildlife play an important role in the transformation of the individual [90,91,92,93] as natural environment has the capacity to bring people out of their mundane existence and immerse them into a different world [94], stimulating new emotional effects upon an individual [95].
Travel has the potential to be more effective than therapy for people who need to make changes in their lives [12], becoming an important tool in psychotherapeutic healing [57], with effects induced by therapeutic [96] or feng-shui landscapes [97], or led by the need for healing experiences that positively influence the behavioural intentions for transformation [98]. The quietness, alongside with an atmosphere of a retreat, surrounded by nature, inspired tourists to reach a state in which attitudinal, emotional and physical attributes are being questioned and changed [91]. Anthropogenic places are also transformative, if they can instigate certain emotions and provide authenticity [14], such as retreats that are considered symbols of transformation [81,91], monasteries [99], or even events and festivals [100]. When talking about differences between certain areas ruled by poverty and racial segregation it is noticed that transformation can occur in familiar spaces [31], as well as having the ability to happen even in common places [101]. One of the most valuable aspects of a transformative setting is for it to reach translocality [102] through grasping both a ”sense of place” and a ”care of place” that aid to providing insights and encourage a sense of responsibility in tourists about a certain destination [103]. Places that embody several senses or fusion of certain elements (people, places, landscapes) are also known to be transformative as they stimulate different meanings to each individual and attribute certain emotions and behaviours that can lead to transformation [1]. Yet, is to be reminded that the more transformative impact a destination has upon a traveller, the more attractive the destination will become in the eyes of the consumer [55]. Therefore, further research on different settings can provide insights on what makes a destination transformative.

2.5. Catalysers

2.5.1. Risk, Challenge and Novelty

Transformation is usually accomplished through a series of moments rather than as the entire journey itself [55]. The elements that contribute to these kind of transformative moments are emphasized by the risk and challenge that tend to push peoples boundaries [104,105,106], by novelty and its ability to foster learning [24,74,107] that usually occurs in cross-cultural contexts [108] or by acquiring new skills [109], all of the above contributing to the overall trip satisfaction that is known to have a mediator role in the transformative process [110]. Social inclusivity and acceptance can also foster transformation as it could let the individuals be their true authentic selves in like-minded societies, without fearing of being judged [32,108]. The nature of triggers has yet to be discussed in-depth, and therefore needs further research [111].

2.5.2. Authenticity and Liminality

Authenticity influences transformation to some extent, as its absence can perpetuate various stereotypes and even lead to cultural misunderstandings [112] that subsequently deteriorate the attractiveness of a destination [55], thus discouraging the transformation process [14]. One that is in search for authenticity is lost and desires to escape the mundane life by being aware of their own alienation into the world [113]. The question of staged and real authenticity arises even in matters of places, such as the encounters between wildlife and humans [58]. Therefore, more research must be conducted in this regard. Authenticity, along with liminality, immersiveness, and consumers’ own perceptions of their experiences, significantly influence the transformation process. This refers not only to the authenticity of the place where consumers spend their journey, but also as an experience of their own existential authenticity as part of individual transformation [114,115]. Being true to oneself and feeling the freedom to self-express is also connected to liminality [31,115], as it can blur the lines between the mundane and the extraordinary, similar to a temporary fairy-tale [116] and experience true-to-self emotional changes [117] or unexpected and surprising interactions [58] that aid transformation of the consumer. Inducing liminality must be well mastered and researched furthermore by service providers as too much liminality can bring up confusion and negative effects upon consumers [118,119].

2.5.3. Social Dynamics and Communitas

Transformative tourism is conducted through processes of socialization and acculturation [34,120]. Social interactions can contribute to forming connections with others during tourism activities [1]. These special bonds are often described as communitas [119,121,122], formed connectedness [123], comradery [124], or even family-like relationships [125], and provide mutual exchanges [124] through which the participants can acquire new knowledge, learn new skills, and promote cultural understanding. These can happen in the heat of the moment as of a spontaneous encounter, with people that share same views and beliefs as an ideological bond, or normative by taking different social roles in the new formed communitas [126]. Acculturation happens when consumers arrive in destinations that are contrary to their home life and encounter individuals with other perceptions and beliefs and therefore involuntary starting comparing one to another [1] by engaging in cultural dialogue [127] and start understanding others culture and one’s own. But communication goes beyond human bonding, as life-changing transformations are encountered even between humans and different species, promoting mental health and the feeling of connection to natural environments [109]. If consumers are free to experience their transformation without being interrupted by companions that are similar to their home environment such as family or friends that can disrupt the liminal space or lack of access to the lifestyle of residents [22], social dynamic becomes one of the key elements of the transformative experience and therefore the barriers that surround this dimension needs to be further explored.

2.5.4. Emotions and Peak Experiences

Even though Mezirow’s theory [11] has been a mainstay in the TT scene, Taylor (1997) pointed out the lack of feelings and emotions in his theory [35], therefore academics have slowly started to introduce the role of emotions in transformation [36,37,38] as tourism, transformation and emotions are closely related [63]. Through cognitive (thoughts and beliefs) and affective (emotional reactions) stimulation to a meaningful experience, consumers transform both themselves and the actions they take [6], therefore being precursors to the transformative power of the experience [128]. Emotions have an educating role in shifting perspectives [38], such as the experience of awe expressed in terms of life-changing events [106] or educating consumers towards pro-environmentally behaviours [129]. Some experiences that have a lot of emotional impact on a consumer can lead to the loss of solidity induced by sentiments of fear, helplessness, anger, and self-reproach [130]. This vulnerability state shifts from a dispositional state into a transformative experience [130]. Emotionally charged moments that can lead to wholeness [131], intense happiness, and fulfilment are called “peak experiences” [132] and can be triggered by spontaneity and novelty, unity with others or with nature, introspection, self-development and aesthetic experiences [74]. Therefore Kirillova attributed new dimensions to the transformation process, comparing them to an extended peak experience that springs from both pleasurable and painful experiences, and that usually occurs spontaneously towards the end of a trip [74], while some argue it could happen anytime during the trip [8] as there is a lack of specific moments in which transformation occurs [22]. Similar to “peak experiences”, there are once in a lifetime experiences that alter the ego, mind and body with an intensity experienced during these moments by individuals both physically and emotionally, known as existential hapax [133] that can produce irreversible changes in one’s behaviour and worldview. Therefore, further research towards the area of cognition and emotions should be considered [58,69], including bodily feelings and memories that can enrich tourism transformations [133], understand the present and appreciate one’s transformation as well as the capacity to lead towards a higher frequency of visits in a particular area [37].

2.5.5. Self-Reflection

Self-reflection [11] is a critical part of the transformative experience [22] as it attributes meaning to a trip [107] which adds longevity to the transformation process [84] or creates the failure of a transformation when tourists do not reflect on what they have experienced [134]. Reflecting on a triggering episode provides tourists clarity with regarding themselves and their experiences, possibly with prolonged transformative effects back home, as they begin reintegrating the experience and wisdom learned into the mundane life [9] and therefore make significant changes [58,135]. This process of reflection can take place both formally, through post-trip discussions with various travellers and family [136] and even journal writing, or informally through keeping contact with locals and travellers that stimulate memories and imagination of the journey, along with various media representations, such as films, documentaries, television programmes, or even magazines [1]. Storytelling has the role of reinforcing the meaning of a transformative experience, thus often being used as a tool in the case of emphasizing the process of reflection [137,138], which is why some service providers take advantage of this fact, as a part of encouraging the circular economy [139] and by inducing reflection through questions and discourse art within transformative rituals [140]. Other reflective processes can be materialised into expressive drawings [69], interviews taken by academics that usually appear at the end of the trip [141], travel blogs [107], and through souvenirs as they offer consumers the opportunity to recreate the tourist experience long after its completion [142].

2.6. Tourists’ Outcomes

Transformative tourism experiences talk about physical, emotional, attitudinal changes as well as the acquisition of context-specific skills [23,32] or even academic benefits [143], leading people towards change and transcendence to other perspectives [144], thus beginning to develop a new understanding of themselves and those around them [145,146]. As a result of transformative experiences, many participants felt a personal change in attitude and behaviour that would help them cope with everyday challenges [53]. Introduced generically as self-change or life-changing experiences [147,148,149], these transformations are even translated into the film industry, where the main characters go through a rite of passage or hero’s journey from which they return changed [150,151]. Some transformation outcomes are difficult to quantify [10] since they possess many variables with no specific cultural, traditional, ethnical, age or gender limitations [39]. As each experience is unique to one’s reality, some transformations can be positive and others negative regarding how consumers are addressing the experience [64]. Ergo, researchers should further aim to decipher the yin and yang nature of transformative experiences.

2.6.1. Psychological

Some consumers finally found freedom and empowerment [104], a sense of importance [152] connection to their birthplace [153], while some started trusting themselves and their newly acquired perspectives [16], passed on what they have learned in their community [154], overcame personal fears [155], gained confidence [156], changed their parental philosophy and noticed growth in adaptability [157], or even engaged more in personal growth, all pertained as beneficial aspects acquired from travel [158]. Transformative tourism can encourage towards sustainable behaviours [159] by immersing participants in the environment [94], but also through long-lasting changes in individuals’ identities leading to major shifts in priorities and new habits [23]. Most of the time, upon returning home, tourists feel a state of anxiety as they make the transition from liminality back to everyday routine, but with newly acquired perspectives on life [114]. Thus, both consumers and service providers should take these aspects into account and balance the phenomenon in order not to diminish the transformation.

2.6.2. Physical

Other transformations take the form of overcoming personal physical limits [16,123], as understanding or overcoming one’s limits is part of transformation [63]. It can be reached through effort or suffering that can even be seen as exciting for some consumers [53], resulting in an increased level of personal resilience [39,53,111], self-esteem, and self-efficacy [16]. There is also a link between consumer’s self-esteem and the intention of healing oneself [98], therefore TT outcomes are linked to the health and wellbeing of the individuals. Improvements in appearance [160] or physical abilities [91,161], such as kayaking, fishing, snorkeling, and hiking [94], are also being considered an additional key element of transformative experience [8].

2.6.3. Social

Social dynamics play an important role in developing TT as it can lead to a broadened mindset [68], a blossoming attitude towards society, becoming more tolerant [162], humble [21,163], kind [34], attentive [164], and altruistic towards one’s culture, therefore creating intercultural bonds, forming new intercultural competences [16,165] and gaining relational consciousness [166]. Yet, the immersion in local culture must be consented in order to maintain an equilibrium on both sides, as otherwise studies showcase a negative side of social interactions and culture put into play [167]. As these changes benefit both sides of the story, the transformation process is linked to transformations in the resident’s society, by getting them to become more respectful and involved in creating experiences for tourists [34,165].

2.6.4. Learning and Mastery

Transformative tourism allows consumers to learn about new environments, cultures and different mindsets that can shift their perspectives and help them acquire new skills, attribute new meanings, and foster a global mindset that can last long after the experience by finally understanding the interconnectedness of everything that surrounds them [168]. In this case of knowledge, some consumers established new routines while some experienced role and career changes, even a willingness to educate others around them with their new discovered knowledge [169], hence bettering their lifestyles [147]. Learning about a culture can be translated in attaining local skills, such as playing traditional games, cooking, fishing, and even learning how to fly kites [170]. Sustaining pro-environmental behaviour is also an outcome of transformative tourism [171], as it can foster environmental awareness [172] and responsibility towards the environment [46], along with learning new skills, such as tree planting [94], an increased attentiveness towards water consumption [169], or such skills that can aid an individual throughout life [146].

2.7. Role of Facilitators

Even though consumers play an active role in co-creating their experience [173], facilitators are the ones guiding people throughout their transformation by building the right environment and ambience for the process to begin and get amplified throughout the trip [40]. Through service system transformation [122,174], stakeholders outline different strategies [28], identifying several key elements that are prone to inducing the transformative process and creating special services and products, using core resources and specific design for the experiences [44] that are carefully framed to induce liminality and instigate formation of communitas [140], while eliminating potential factors that can disturb the process such as overly-commercialised transformations [34,121]. Such examples of transformative leadership [45] can be seen in different organisations [29], from site administration that induces several cognitive and affective scenarios [175], to tour guides that are encouraged to stop being conventional and lead consumers throughout their experiences [165,176,177], clients that are being encouraged by service providers to change their habits and constantly adopt new challenges that generate transformative behaviours [96], stakeholders that are emboldened to educate the individuals towards sustainability [172], designed programs to facilitate transformative learning [178] or even the usage of transformative technologies [179], such as AI that can aid the potential to transform existing tourism experiences and unlock a new level of custom-made tourists experiences [180]. This holistic perspective still needs further research as it has only been discussed over the past few years. Yet, there are also cases where some organisations superficially treat transformation more as a form of profit than in a way of helping individuals on different journeys. In such cases, if the intention is not there, consumers will not be able to transform [181], tourists ending up only with marketing proclaims that do not match the reality [55], rehearsing the same old adage of an unrealistically optimistic side of the transformative story. In order to achieve a proper marketing strategy and to match with what was promised [182], both service providers and the community should be aware and informed about the transformative phenomenon, how it happens and what it entails alongside with taking the personalised needs of consumers into account. The reasoning behind it is to avoid unrealistic views of transformation and consequently disappointing tourists and their perception of TT, indirectly influencing their future travel choices. Some proposed an emphasis on symbolism as a benchmark in TT marketing [9], while others considered relating transformation to magic [34] yet maintaining genuineness of the marketing strategy. However, this marketing dimension must be better shaped through research [48] to maintain the same waterline between truth, outcomes, and consumers desires.

Facilitators’ Outcomes

But the tourists are not the only ones being transformed [165,183], as transformation is a co-creative phenomenon that requires involvement on both sides and works by exchanging ideas and learn about other cultures [184], knowledge that would benefit locals, visitors, and the environment [124]. In some cases, transformation is more evident in the host communities than in tourist themselves, providing eudaimonic experiences to locals [149], as seeing consumers enjoying and appreciating one’s culture [185] enhances its value, making hosts more self-aware and appreciative of their own culture and therefore shaping a host-guest connection for the better [25]. Some service providers, such as tour guides, learn to reflect upon their own values and attitudes that lead to positive changes in their lives [186], while some of the hosts gain an understanding of how to be more environmentally friendly, to take on new responsibilities, switch gender roles and feel empowered by it, and even revitalising culture practices and traditions, being proud of their ability to learn, exchange, teach cultural practices, and form communitas with visitors [26]. However, further research on this topic is required as it has only permeated the academic scene in recent years. Figure 1 summarizes the findings of the literature review section of the article.
Closely tied with positive psychology that is known to contribute to one’s healthy lifestyle, once committed, the transformative experience has the potential to plant the seeds for future series of lasting transformations [187], as the consumer recognizes the positive changes in their life related to this process, making them eager to further explore this area of life-changing experiences that could improve the wellbeing and overall quality of life of the individuals [28]. Therefore, it is necessary for service providers to religiously research these experiences, as they take the role of catalysts for a chain of transformations not only in the consumer’s life, but in the lives of all actors participating in this tourism phenomenon. From an inductive point of view, a transformed customer is going to enhance local communities’ perceptions by increasing uniqueness of individuals and overall awareness (e.g., social, environmental), by adding valuable information for service providers to outline TT dimensions, but also transform their home community by showcasing, promoting and educating individuals on new behaviours once they arrive back from the trip. These outcomes can enhance sustainable and pro-environmental behaviours [8] through pro-active transformative learning and increased self-awareness [94] that can elongate the protection over one’s environment and culture. Furthermore, engaging with new people and environments with their now-changed worldview, a transformed customer contributes to subsequent transformative echoes throughout one’s lifetime. Considering the previous chain of events, it, can be considered that transformative tourism has indeed the potential of changing the world.
This section aims to deliver a comprehensive view upon the subject and to extract dimensions that still need to be discussed or yet to be more carefully analysed. Further research requires longitudinal studies [8,188], adding new depths of time [178] and changes along with a consistent cultural background [22], as well as filling the gaps with other types of tourism that engage in the transformation process [111]. There is also a requirement of a more detailed view upon tourists’ profiles [8], and the different nature of triggers such as liminality, cognition, emotion, and authenticity along with the insertion of new settings through transformative perspective lens. Therefore, a requirement of layering information for a better organisation and explication of TT dimensions is to be considered, along with holistic perspectives upon the transformation process, new methods and paradigms that could be employed [49], and an accurate portrayal of all the actors involved in the transformative process. Furthermore, given that this process is gaining momentum and is constantly developing, there is a need for a bibliometric approach to track its growth in a more objective and quantitative manner.

3. Methodology

3.1. Data Collection and Article Screening

The investigation reviewed papers associated with transformative tourism found on four databases (Web of Science, Science Direct, EBSCO Discovery Service-EDC and Google Scholar). The reason for choosing several databases was to encompass a larger area of research and increase the accuracy of the study. Publication selection phase followed Moher et al. (2009)’s Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), resulting in a four-step process including identification of studies, screening, eligibility and inclusion [189], as can be observed in Figure 2.
During the identification phase, several sets of combined keywords were applied to collect research related to transformative tourism. Terms such as “transformation”, “transformative”, “travel“, “tourism“, and “experience“ were used to identify a broader spectrum of the subject, as individually, they were the most encountered keywords utilised within the TT domain, found after a brief scan over the four databases. Namely, ”transformative tourism or travel” as well as ”transformative experience(s)” and ”tourism or travel” and ”transformation” were used during the search phase. In the screening process, publication types other than English-only journal articles were excluded, except for a few bilingual papers. Decisions to employ journal articles were only based on the reasoning of being a source of certified and critically reviewed papers [190] along with the preference on journals among researchers regarding bibliometric analysis [191]. Several papers (n = 123) could not be further found on the platforms due to technical issues regarding the redirection to a temporarily unavailable server and therefore were included in a not available section (N/A). In the eligibility phase, even though findings resulted in an enormous number of publications, all of them were scrutinized by titles, abstracts and keywords. To prevent the omission of an important body of knowledge, another analysis on articles that were not initially suitable for the study was conducted. Content-wise, a large number of papers were found to be unrelated to travel and tourism and therefore have been eliminated. Publications that failed to acknowledge the process of transformative tourism or linkages of both tourism and transformation were also excluded. Fair few articles, even if in alignment with ideas related to TT, such as the power of awe [192], authenticity [193], storytelling [194], immersion [195], as well as memorable experience and subjective wellbeing [196], were considered ineffectual to the present study as they were unable to produce connections to TT and therefore excluded. The last criterion of exclusion was time, as database research concluded on 1 May 2022, publications released after this date were excluded from this study. The time frame analysed was based on the earliest [12] and latest [42] articles related to TT found on the databases, resulting in a research period of twenty-five years. Prior to removing duplicates, data regarding citation count were saved as it can measure the overall quality of work [197].
From initially 7029 entries, during the PRISMA process of selection 250 articles were found eligible and included in the study, consisting of literature that has been discussed back-and-forth by researchers in the field, papers emphasizing junctures between transformation, tourism and other domains, as well as newly introduced publications on transformative tourism that incorporate previous TT studies. The bibliometric aspects from all the databases were merged and exported into an Excel spreadsheet for analysis. The data extracted included article title, abstract, keywords, authors and their affiliations, publication date, journal titles and categories, publishers, institutions, funding associations, geographical distribution, and citation count. The main topics and themes of the papers were also added to another Excel spreadsheet for further qualitative analysis.

3.2. Data Analysis

To fulfil the scope of this study, a bibliometric analysis was employed as it can reveal certain features of science, including most contributing authors, universities, countries, journals, and institutions [198], regarding a certain area of research and observe the evolution of the scientific literature of the related knowledge domain. This type of analysis is paramount to studying literature tendencies and the state of art across various fields [199] and therefore able to manage a significant volume of scientific data and produce noteworthy overall impact [200]. The central approach of the analysis was based on Donthu et al.’s (2021) main techniques of performance, science mapping and enrichment analysis [200]. Performance is related to both publication and citation metrics, whereas science mapping focuses mainly on the relationship among publications, topics, and authors, while enrichment is characterised by network analysis, clustering, and visualisation techniques [200]. Yet, since scientometrics evaluates the quantitative aspects of science it imbricates bibliometric analysis to a degree [201] and was therefore added in the methodology of the study. Combined, both techniques provide a comprehensive view on productivity, impact and influence on the subject in matter.
The annual number of publications determined publishing tendencies, while the geographical distribution of the articles aided in identifying the level of dissemination in TT research. The overall quality of work was measured using citation analysis on publications and authors, identifying the most impactful papers as well as most influential authors. Co-authorship was analysed in order to observe collaboration patterns between universities or authors, to better understand ongoing friendly literature debates, as well as the spread of the subject both nationally and internationally. The level of reliance and relevance regarding the sources of information was analysed using parameters such as quartile, h-index, impact factor, and citation indicator on journals and publishers in TT. Further observation of the interdisciplinarity of the TT was revealed by the subjects and categories of the journals in which the articles were published. The most influential and specialised universities were discovered alongside the funding associations that supported the research in this area of study. The evolution of the intellectual structure as well as the emerging trends of transformative tourism were identified using the most occurred keywords to capture the development of TT overtime as well as the level of propagation and capacity of encompassing new information along the way. In order to obtain the broadest possible perspective on the subject, both main and sub theme articles on TT were considered, as to discover new junctures in topics and also to observe changes in the focus on the TT literature. In addition, the main research methods, perspectives and types of tourism regarding TT were displayed to add further dimension to the subject in matter.
Performance analysis technique parameters were manually searched and included total publications (TP), number of contributing authors (NCA), sole-authored publications (SA), co-authored publications (CA), total citations (CT), and h-index (h). Correlation between performance parameters resulted in the science mapping technique that consisted of citation, co-occurrence and co-authorship analysis. Data regarding geographic distribution, universities, and funding associations were extracted from a quick scan over whole documents. Journal rankings, subjects, and categories were identified using SCImago Database while Journal Impact Factor and Journal Citation Indicator were found on Clarivate’s Journal Citations Reports. Information from all the databases were merged using Mendeley reference manager and imported into VOSviewer software for further usage of bibliometric tools and visualisation techniques. By a thorough examination, qualitative dimensions were extracted as follows: (1) main topics were clustered and transposed into literature review section; (2) types of tourism were listed and shifted afterwards into bigger categories (e.g., cultural tourism comprises dark, film, aboriginal tourism etc.); (3) methods applied were classified into qualitative, quantitative and mixed categories after extracting them from methodology section; while (4) perspective parameters were grouped based on whether the publications were aimed towards tourists, stakeholders, hosts or having an overall view of the subject in matter. All the aforementioned analyses aimed to obtain an up-to-date comprehensive overview of the nature of TT.

4. Results and Discussion

Throughout the following section, the results obtained from the bibliometric analysis were displayed and discussed. These objective parameters served as a means to better frame the evolution of TT literature and finding the amount of interest granted to this matter, such as the degree of information dissemination, overall quality of work, stand-out publications, most reliable sources of information, collaboration patterns, level of interdisciplinarity and expertise, emerging trends, as well as most used methods, perspectives, and types of tourism that shape TT.

4.1. General Literature Trends of Transformative Tourism Related Publications

Connections between tourism and transformation were long acknowledged by researchers [4], yet it was the year of 1998 when Kottler first introduced the term of ”transformative travel” [12]. What was believed to be a hesitant start (1998–2003), with intertwined ups and downs along the years, resulted in an overall positive tendency in growth and interest according to the trendline of literature on TT (Figure 3).
In the last few years (2017–2022), more than 70% of the whole literature has been written, therefore confirming Pine and Gilmore’s (2013) statement of TT growing into an emerging trend in the industry [51], along with its transformative experiences becoming the new buzzword [6]. The surge of interest in TT literature in the year of 2020 was reasoned by the significant change in world-wide consciousness under the circumstances of COVID-19 pandemic as its impact hurtled into a more transformative form of tourism [202] by introducing new perspectives from different domains into the research design [203] that could aid both economic and social recovery [39] and that could also lead to spiritual elevation and healing [57]. The year of 2022 presented a lower number of articles as it was measured only by the first five months of the year, since the analysis conducted ended in May 2022.

4.2. Geographic Distribution

As a matter of geographic distribution, articles regarding TT were found to be conducted in several regions (Table 1). To have a better understanding of the outspread this phenomenon possesses, data were measured based on countries of affiliation. Since various papers had more than one author, several countries were attributed to a single article, but duplicates found in the same article were removed for a better picture on the subject.
The highest frequency was attributed to Europe, which was found in 121 articles, followed by North America (84), Oceania (61), and Asia and Pacific (33) ending with Africa (10), Middle East (6), and South America (6). From a regional point of view, research related to TT was mostly found in Europe, North America, and Oceania, whereas country-wise, United Kingdom (40), United States (73), and Australia (49) were found to be the most prolific countries regarding the number of articles on transformative tourism. There were 48 countries that have published at least one paper related to the topic, 15 countries with more than five papers and eight countries with more than 10 articles regarding TT. There is a visible difference in the ratio of developed and emerging countries, the first dominating the latter, as most partnerships are found to be only between developed countries, overlooking potentially valuable information on TT development from not associating with other emerging countries. Even if the numbers are uneven, it can be stated that the interest of this phenomenon is becoming world-wide, having a high degree of information dissemination.

4.3. Citation Analysis

After acknowledging the growth in the number of papers related to TT over the years, as well as the wide geographic distribution of the articles, the next step considered concerned the level of relevance of the papers. Thus, the number of citations was analysed as it can measure the influence of both the authors and journals in the matter [204], as well as the overall quality of literature [197]. The information regarding the citation count was gathered from the four databases analysed in the study (Web of Science, EBSCO, Science Direct and Google Scholar).
A general view of the citation structure in TT was represented in Table 2. It was discerned that the literature on transformative tourism consisted of a scant number of articles in charge of a high volume of citations that varies from 200 up to over 500 citations. The familiarity and accesibility of Google Scholar database are shown both in the number of total citations (59.2% of overall citations) as well as being the host of the most cited papers on TT of all the databases. Close after, WOS database encountered fair few top cited articles as well as a large number of total citations on TT (21.8% of overall citations). Both EBSCO and SD databases, even if owning the smallest amount of TT literature, represented between almost 6% and respectively 13.09% of overall citations.
In spite of the differences in the citation patterns from one database to another, the majority of articles range from one to 100 citations per database, therefore outlining the equal interest granted among the databases as well as the novelty of the subject in matter. At the other end of the line, a notable number of articles could not hit the 1 citation level as most of the articles situated between these measurements were recently added in the academic scene and have had no time to be cited by other scholars yet. Nevertheless, reckoning up the average citation count regarding TT as well as the continual growth shown in the recent years, an increase in citations in the near future is to be expected.
The identification of the most impactful publications was measured considering the the top five publications on each database in number of citations as well as the average of their citations per year (C/Y). As represented in Table 3, Sigala’s work from 2020 occupied the first position in three out of four databases, with an impressive number of citations obtained in the shortest amount of time. An explanation for this position was the high level of interdisciplinarity (coupled with business and health matters), as well as its linkage to the pandemic (COVID-19), overall considering transformation to be a focal point in tourism nowadays [203]. Minor differences between three out of four databases were found, resulting in a consensus in regard to the most impactful publications. Whether following the narrative of transformation in backpacking tourism [14], describing tourism as a potential agent of change [30], revealing the capacity of international sojourns to transform students’ personal and professional lives [16], pinpointing the transformative learning process through travel and tourism [205] and associating it with alternative ways of sustainable tourism [206], or even showcasing the transformative benefits in wellness [24], spirituality [77], volunteering [207], or extreme sports tourism [13,18], the top publications enabled the reader to discover different facets of transformation in tourism as well as the importance of including such aspects into the day-to-day life. Most of the publications encountered in the list (Table 3) have had a long history of activity (from eight up to 23 years), and therefore present a significant time span to be analysed, reviewed, and cited.
Out of a total of 20,129 citations on transformative tourism literature on the four databases, 8261 citations were found in the first 12 most cited papers (41.04%). Thus, these articles were considered fundamental works on the subject in matter.
The most influential authors on TT were pinpointed using total number of publications regarding transformative tourism along with the corresponding number of citations, all represented in Table 4. The authors with at least three publications that managed to achieve at least a h-index of 3 in one of the four databases were added to the list, resulting in a total of twelve authors. In this scenario, Lehto was positioned first on the list of authors, with a total of five publications on the subject, 816 total citations and the highest h-index of all (five), confirming that the author in discuss had the greatest impact regarding transformative tourism literature. The antithesis between authors was also highlighted, whereas even if some authors met the same criteria of the number of publications, the difference between the citation count was visible (e.g., Sigala with a total of 2322 citations and Soulard with 149 citations). Regarding country-of-origin frequency, United States led the way with four entries, half belonging to Purdue University and the other half to Virginia Tech University.

4.4. Co-Authorship

According to the TT literature, various authors contributed along the way to the development of this field of study, resulting in 509 authors who published articles related to transformative tourism in a time span of twenty-four years (1998 to 2022). From a total of 509 authors, only 78 had sole-author publications, resulting in a myriad of two or more authors on a single publication (84.67%). Additionally, several articles were found to be co-authored by the same scholars, therefore resulting in a high collaboration level on the subject (Table 5). Co-authorship was examined to highlight the level of interactions between researchers under the form of intellectual relationships [208]. Several articles were co-authored internationally (e.g., USA- Hong Kong; Italy-New Zealand-South Africa), some nationally (e.g., Soulard, J.; Stern, M. J.; McGehee, N.) or even by authors belonging to the same university (e.g., Laing, J. H; Frost, W.–La Trobe University), fast-forwarding the discovery of several points of view on TT, leading towards a better comprehension on the subject in matter.
Most of the repetitive collaboration patterns were observed between 2014 and 2020 (Figure 4), concluding in a worldwide increase in the interest rate reinforced by the expansion of literature findings. In addition, these co-authorships could outline and integrate different points of view and contribute to an increased level of coherence and conceiving core characteristics that may help and encourage scholars globally. Continuous collaborations between formed groups of researchers could signify the need of more in-depth observations in the nature of TT, as more fruitful directions worth of being highlighted are discovered after conducting initial research, with researchers thus slowly becoming specialised in the subject. Yet, more collaborations should be established in order to form a solid network focused on TT.

4.5. Journal and Publisher Analysis

A total of 101 journals were found to have published articles related to transformative tourism (Table 6). From the total, a noteworthy percentage (26%) of journals published only one single article, implying the fact that the theme could be transposed into several other domains, strengthening the idea of a high level of interdisciplinarity regarding TT (e.g., subjects as psychology, sustainability and ethnography). Next in line were the journals that have published two (11.2%), three (1.2%), or four articles (8%) alongside the vast majority that have published between five and twenty-six articles per journal (53.6%), indicating that most journals were specialised and tourism related.
The most prolific journals were computed using number of publications and top citations regarding transformative tourism. The set of data was complemented by journal ranking (quartile; Q) and h-index. The final list (Table 6) included many reliable tourism and hospitality journals, the majority of which were situated in the first quartile as found on SCIMago Database. Clarivate’s Journal Citations Reports helped identifying the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) for the year of 2020 and Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) over the last three years. According to Clarivate, the usual value of JCI is 1, and therefore articles that had a JCI of more than 1 were considered as having a greater citation impact than the average.
In this research, 12 journals from the top list on TT had a value that surpassed the average, even with a score of 2.99 in the case of Journal of Travel Research. Journal Impact Factor on top journals ranged from 1762 to 10982, the top three with biggest JFI being positioned in top ten of journals on TT. Two of the top journals could not be found in the system while some (n = 3) had data only on JCI indicating some did not meet the metrics for Journal Impact Factor to be calculated.
Annals of Tourism Research was found to be the leader of the list, with 10.4% of the total of articles on TT, 5828 total citations and a h-index of 21 on the TT literature, seconded by Tourism Management Perspectives with only half of the articles on the subject (5.2%), far fewer citations (1176), and a h-index of 9, whereas the third Journal of Sustainable Tourism was situated as being 4.4% of the total articles on transformative tourism, with 1202 citations and the same h-index as the previous journal (9). The top three journals were also scored Q1 in the Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management category and having a total journal h-index situated between 54 and 187. As for the top five publishers, Taylor and Francis Ltd. led the way with 15 articles published on TT, closely followed by Routledge (14), Elsevier (10), Sage (eight), and Wiley-Blackwell (five). For this analysis, journals that were not to be found in the SCImago Database were excluded from the list (n = 21). The top 20 journals have published 154 articles, representing 61.6% of the total number of publications on the subject. Citation-wise, the first 20 most prolific journals covered 76.97% of all citations on TT (15,494 citations out of a total number of 20129) and were therefore considered to be specialised on the subject.
A representation of the evolution of the annual number of papers published in top 20 journals was displayed in Table 7, with a clear distinction of continuous interest growth over the years. Findings show that in the first few years up until 2012, a very small number of journals published articles on this topic, while the latter years show an evolution in matters of interest in TT. While some journals maintained a consistent pace, by publishing articles almost every year (e.g., Annals of Tourism Research), some gained interest and joined along the way, as more and more linkages were discovered between TT and other subject areas (e.g., Sustainability, Religions, Journal of Business Research).
Articles regarding transformative tourism were found in twelve different journal subjects. The most encountered were situated around Social Sciences (36%), Business, Management and Accounting (30.9%), and Arts and Humanities (8.8%), yet an array of journal subjects touched upon transformative tourism such as Environmental Science, Psychology, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Medicine, Computer Science, and even Engineering. Each journal subject related to TT had several categories (n = 56), the most prominent being related to tourism and geography, such as Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (21.2%) and Geography, Planning and Development (14.1%). Not that prominent yet noticeable categories included Social and Political Science (4.9%), Cultural Studies (4.3%), Education (3.3%), Social Psychology (3.3%), and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (3.3%). These findings revealed the variety of topics that transformative tourism could address (Table 8).

4.6. Universities and Funding Associations

Research has shown that 265 different universities and institutions have contributed to the body of knowledge regarding transformative tourism from all over the world. More than 70% of universities (n = 194) contributed to only one article, 12.07% of them to two articles (n = 32), while 7.1% of them contributed to three articles (n = 19). A representation of the top universities among TT articles was designed in Table 9, based on the number of articles written and their reference times as some articles had one or more authors from the same institutions. The criteria for the top 20 was for the universities to have at least one entry in four or more articles, representing a total of only 7.54% of all universities.
Findings shown that Griffith University received first place regarding both the number of articles in which it contributed (n = 10) and as the most encountered university among TT publications (n = 15), denoting its interest in the subject among scholars. Out of a of 265 universities, only eight contributed to more than five articles. The reason behind these results was given by the novelty of the subject and its interdisciplinarity, which is still changing shape and adding value as time goes by and therefore many institutions still have time to create new links and become specialised in the field of study. What is certain is that with this evolutionary path and the discovery of various themes that could be included in this area of study, more and more institutions will soon start to gravitate towards all that transformative tourism has yet to offer.
Considering that this subject has developed relatively recent in the academic world, the number of associations providing funds is small, consisting of 21.2% (Table 10) out of the total articles. Thus, it is to be specified that the number of articles that were integrated in the “Not funded” category (78.8%) also included the publications in which the authors not clearly mentioned the support offered by certain institutions, and therefore added to the latter section. However, the typology of funding associations seemed to be quite varied, ranging from governmental support, to research councils, certain awards, national funds to grants offered by universities and even private actors, reflecting the increased and diverse interest on the subject in matter. Out of all 53 articles funded, five were sponsored by Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (FCT) and four entries were attributed to Yale and its branches, while eight funding associations had two entries each, leaving the rest (n = 28) with only one entry each.

4.7. Intellectual Structure and Emerging Trends

In the following section, the most common words and group of words encountered in titles and abstracts of the articles were taken into consideration to evaluate the most frequently occurring topics in the field using tools provided by VOSviewer. In this research, 5451 terms were identified. Only 362 words or group of words occurred more than five times (6.64%), 151 more than ten times (2.77%), 26 more than 30 times (0.47%), and only 11 more than 50 times (0.20%). The keywords that occurred more than ten times were displayed in Figure 5. Out of 151 terms, a filter of relevance was applied by VOSviewer that selected 60% of the most relevant words, remaining with only ninety-two keywords. Terms that were usually encountered as part of the usual structure of an article, such as “further research” or “area” did not provide information on the specific subject and therefore were excluded, leaving a total of 72 keywords with more than ten occurrences remaining. The size of the nodes represented the number of occurrences of a mentioned keyword, while the size of the lines expressed the number of links between the keywords. TLS (total link strength) indicated the number of links between a word with other words or group of words, embossing the importance of a keyword [209]. The further the nodes from the centre, the fewer links to other keywords were found [209]. The evolution through time was shown by the colour of the nodes and lines. Recently, “COVID” appeared among the keywords in the database, as it shifted the perception of consumers towards a more sustainable way of thinking and acting, this change being echoed in tourism as well. Newer terms, such as “host” and ”resident”, show the interest towards a more holistic view over the subject in matter, while the usage of combinations consisting of ”transformative”, ”tourism” and its linkages with ”experiences”, denoted scholars beginning to embrace the terminology among the academic community.
The top keywords based on occurrences and TLS were displayed in Table 11. As shown, the five most recurrent words were: travel, outcome, nature, motivation and dimension. The first word defined the action itself, whereas terms, such as outcome, motivation, and dimension, conveyed the interest in the characteristics of transformative tourism, while nature described both the need of understanding the nature of the subject as well as describing one of the preferred settings in which TT takes place.

4.8. Theme Identifiers Analysis

Out of 250 articles, just over half of them (51.6%) had transformative tourism as the main topic of debate, discussion and research while 48.4% included transformative tourism only as a part or dimension of other main topics discussed. The reason why the latter were also chosen in the study is that they too contribute to the body of knowledge on transformative tourism by bringing new views and junctions of situations with other research areas which can also be interpreted as a consequence of the interdisciplinarity of the topic in question. Even though in the years of 2017 or 2018, the secondary theme articles were greater in number as the subject was and still is in its discovery phase, in the last few years (2019–2022) it shifted towards articles that expressed TT as the main theme and therefore implying the growth and interest on a more detailed side of the subject. Main theme articles included research that focused only on the transformative process of tourism, whereas articles classified as having secondary topics related to the transformation process in tourism, met one of the following criteria: (a) the transformation process in tourism was highlighted as one of the outcomes or motivations of the main topic that was not initially thought to be related to transformative tourism; (b) the transformation process in tourism was mentioned or joined to other topics discussed in the article, thus forming connections with other domains. Some of the sub-theme articles included the importance of self-love in tourism as an emotion that could lead to more meaningful and transformative experiences [37], or the linkages to hopeful and social tourism [210,211,212,213], the hero’s journey as a tool for advertising transformative experiences [214], transformation as a path towards innovation in tourism [215], the transformative potential of the existential wish to search or manifest a person’s values and identity [216], or even an exhaustive research on experiences where there was a light shed on transformative experiences [128]. The current state of balance in topic coverage in TT articles is represented below (Table 12), however, a turnaround is expected in the upcoming years as the focus shifts in the favour of more in-depth analyses on the nature of TT, thus enhancing the main theme literature.
The distribution of methods within articles based on transformative tourism was shown in Table 13. It was observed that there is a dominance of qualitative analysis, represented by 80.8% of the total methods. Out of 202 articles based only on qualitative analysis, some were purely based on secondary data (n = 68), some on multiple qualitative analysis, such as participatory observation, photography, interviews (n = 62), while some emphasized only on interviews (n = 40) or other forms such as focus groups, narrative or performance inquiries and netnographies (n = 32). New creative means of research such as the use of performance inquiries through drawings [69] or digital environment research using netnographies that conduct various internet analyses [45] were deployed to discover different paths of obtaining qualitative data regarding TT. The preference towards a qualitative approach lies within its capabilities to understand specific relations, concepts and opinions of a given situation which becomes suitable in studying the contextual nature of the transformative experiences as it creates space for revealing in-depth details by observing underlying reasons, motivations and unique perspectives of each and every person experiencing TT. On the other hand, quantitative analysis was significantly lower encountered in only twenty-four articles (9.6%). These methods included both surveys and questionnaires and were mostly utilised for testing several hypotheses on TT such as the Transformative Travel Experience Scale [43] or finding certain descriptive characteristics of tourists’ profiles [110]. Mixed methods combined both quantitative and qualitative analyses bringing a far more holistic approach to the subject (9.6%). By considering the methods utilised for mixed analyses, most used qualitative methods were interviews (43.2%) referenced in 108 articles, followed by secondary data (36.8%) in 92 articles and participatory observations (21.2%) in 53 articles, while the quantitative inquiries were surveys (11.2%) encountered in 28 articles and questionnaires (5.2%) in 13 articles. Overall, the ground gained by the qualitative analysis in this case was due to the subjective nature of the transformative experience and the attempt to highlight and bring out many new dimensions to find new connections and add value to more comprehensive frameworks that through usage of quantitative methods could bring renewed promise regarding the practicability of TT.
In Table 13 shown above, the research perspectives regarding transformative tourism were also analysed. The vast majority occupied the tourist’s point of view (66%), followed by a general approach (17.6%) in which the perspectives were not the main focus of the articles and mostly being analysed through expert lenses. Stakeholders’ perspective included organisations and service-providers and reached 5.6% of the articles, while host perspectives only 2.4%. The multiple approach included combined perspectives between the actors towards a more holistic viewpoint and occupied 8.4% of the total articles.
Several types of tourism that are currently represented by TT were found in the research sample, resulting in a number of 9 broad categories as shown below (Table 14).
Most of the articles belonged to a general view (25.6%) upon the subject, either encompassing a range of types of tourism or discussing issues related to other dimensions of this area of study, such as transformative strategies used in organisations [42], intense forms of transformation such as existential hapax [133], a scale to measure transformative travel experiences [43], the role of a transformative tourism destination [155], or even the linkage between TT and positive psychology [297], as it can improve the overall quality of life.
Eight more clusters were identified with cultural tourism occupying 15.6% of total articles, nature-based tourism with 14% of the total articles, religious tourism 11.6%, educational 8.8%, voluntourism 6%, wellness and wellbeing 5.2%. The last two clusters included other types of tourism that could not be integrated into the other sections such as business tourism, mass tourism and smart tourism (7.6%) and niche tourism such as orphanage tourism, paranormal tourism and beer tourism (5.6%). What has been extracted from this analysis is that transformative tourism is increasingly starting to fold into different types of tourism, becoming a desirable outcome especially in recent years with the pandemic and the increasing autonomy and desires of today’s generations.

5. Conclusions and Directions for Further Research

The importance of this study lies within the addition of a new layer to transformative tourism, complementary to what has been written so far in the academic literature by using a bibliometric analysis to capture the evolution in a quantitative and objective manner and therefore enhance the understanding of this phenomenon. The article conducted a bibliometric and visualisation analysis on transformative tourism over a period of twenty-four years (1998–2022) so as to cover the entire period of publication on this topic found on four different databases, thus building an up to date and complete overview of the TT literature.
After a brief content analysis of the 250 publications found on the subject, it can be argued that transformative tourism is gaining interest through the chronology of topics covered, increasing the level of immersion into the subject and highlighting constant movement from theory to practicality. Continuously shape-shifting from one article to the next, the authors actively engage by trying to find solutions to unfinished ideas or problems previously mentioned by other academics, or even bringing new directions into the discussion, the literature thus flourishing and gaining momentum. Several useful literature insights have been provided by researchers over time related to this phenomenon. What can be inferred from the literature review is the capacity of transformation to thrive in both negative and positive emotions to a certain degree, attributing a yin–yang nature to TT. Furthermore, as the course of transformative tourism experience can differ from an individual to the other, the anatomy of TT becomes chameleonic, as a multitude of variables and stimuli (catalysers) can come into shape which subsequently leads to transformation. These contexts are not generally defined by time and space, but by the ethos of all the participants involved in the process, thus highlighting the essential role of co-creation in TT, as newer studies have shown the importance of TT leadership, host communities and consumers working all together towards a greater good, bettering the selves and the world around them, improving overall quality of life and wellbeing. Yet, these variables and catalysers need to be taken into further consideration as they could surface new ideas and provide new developments regarding the subject in matter. Even though academic community is responsive in matters of transformative tourism, literature on the subject still implies a need for more in-depth analysis on certain core components, newly introduced aspects, or even conceptualising different frameworks and their projection through time. Therefore, TT is yet to be fully discovered as many opportunities arise from evaluation and continuity where others left the research stage.
Furthermore, the study examined various aspects of objective matter in understanding TT, finding several key points that serve as a glimpse of evolution on the subject. Although initially the course of the academic literature on TT has been a meandering one with both ups and downs over the past twenty-four years, publications within this area have had an overall positive trend in growth of interest, particularly in the last five years which encompassed over 70% of all literature written on the subject. This sudden surge of interest was coupled with significant changes in worldwide consciousness in the context of the pandemic, but also as new interactions formed between different domains trying to balance out and adapt to current situations.
Transformative tourism literature has been treated as an important research topic as articles were found to be conducted in several world regions such as Europe, North America and Oceania that are currently taking the lead in this matter. Even though unevenly distributed throughout the world, with most articles around United Kingdom, The United States, and Australia, it can be stated that the interest of this phenomenon is worldwide as an emergence of other countries in recent years is also noticeable, therefore emphasizing the continuous outspread of the phenomenon.
Despite having a scant number of articles among a high volume of citations that could be considered reference studies in the field, most of the publications have been only recently added in the academic scene, and therefore are yet to be cited. Most impactful publications have a long history of activity, thus a significant timeframe to be analysed, reviewed and further cited alongside with a high level of cross-disciplinarity and the consideration of transformative tourism as a cure for global problems such as the after-effects induced by COVID-19 or even climate change, that started concerning researchers not only from the tourism field. Its significance in quality of work is blooming as a yearly increase of citations is shown in TT domain, with the expectance of continuity over the next years.
In twenty-four years, a great number of authors participated in the academic research in regard to transformative tourism, yet the greatest impact in literature was achieved by few standout authors from different countries of origin, deducing the fact that several researchers are starting to become specialised in the TT domain. Vast majority of publications contained two or more authors that intertwined internationally, nationally or even belonging to the same universities. Several were co-authored by the same scholars and therefore a high intellectual collaboration level can be deduced from this statement. The repetitive collaboration patterns were observed between 2014 and 2020, concluding in a worldwide increase in interest rates reinforced by the expansion of literature findings and co-creation by bringing new visions to the table. Co-authorship could define and encompass different points of view as well as an accumulation of cohesive core structures that could be applied globally, therefore encouraging growth of literature on this subject.
A noteworthy number of journals were transposed into several domains, therefore strengthening the idea of interdisciplinarity among academic literature on TT. Most prolific journals which comprised the top publications and citations were considered reliable, well-known and established sources of information that specialised on the subject, and while some present a gradual distribution of growth over time, some gained interest along the way as more linkages were discovered between transformative tourism and other subject areas, therefore sustaining an array of categories that it could address.
Numerous universities and institutions have contributed to the knowledge of TT from all over the world. While some were to be considered specialised as having several articles written on the topic, the majority provided only one article related to TT, thus reinforcing the novelty of the subject, the interdisciplinarity and the ever-changing shape and added value as time goes by that can lead to new joints and discoveries, hence new scholars from different universities would soon come into play and get a grip on the subject.
A small number of funding associations were found in the academic research on TT as it developed relatively recently, yet the actors that contributed were typologically varied and therefore shown a diverse increase in interest. Although few associations have supported research in this area, some have made it a habit (e.g., Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (FCT) and Yale and its branches), reinforcing and encouraging the idea of TT development.
The most frequently occurring topics revolved around key characteristics of TT that needed to be examined such as outcomes, motivations, dimensions, nature and the journey itself. Evolution of keywords showed that throughout the years, what started as a form of learning with overall life-changing experiences, has grown into finally associating and embracing the terminology of TT in the academic world, towards greater engagement in a more holistic and sustainable approach, having linkages even to the circular economy, adapting it to today’s problems and desires (such as COVID and attaining certain environmental behaviours), including several strategies implemented by organisations and businesses, thus making an overall relevant impact in the world. Further research should dive deeper into the connections with sustainability and circular economy. Even if in terms of the representativeness of the topic there is a balance between transformative tourism as a main or as a secondary theme, it is noticeable that since 2019 there is an emphasis and a shift towards a far more detailed view on TT as studies started embracing the domain more thoroughly.
The dominance of qualitative analysis throughout the years comes in response to the subjective nature of the transformative tourism experiences and by the initial frenzy of discovering as much as possible about the dimensions and connections of this type of tourism, thus gradually adding value to more comprehensive views upon the subject (as new creative methods reinforced along the way), that with the aid of quantitative methods could incorporate, quantify, simplify, and apply new frameworks into a discussion that could be further used to add consensus and eliminate all inconsistencies, which could further support blueprints for practitioners from all over the world. Perspective-wise, mainly focused on tourists’ point of view, more research should emphasize the role of co-creation in transformative tourism experiences, including all actors participating in this process and therefore adding a holistic dimension to TT. The root of transformative tourism is forging new connections and it is continually starting to fold into different types of tourism, becoming a desirable outcome especially in recent years due to the pandemic, increase in autonomy, and matching desires of today’s generation. Researchers should further examine different destinations, types of tourists and tourism, as well as proper marketing techniques to manage creating a cohesive framework on TT that could be easily followed by other academics and practitioners. By providing empirical evidence of the results of the implementation of TT in different settings, practitioners could further resonate and identify with certain aspects that could be fruitful in their case scenarios, thus providing impetus to try TT. Furthermore, with the acquired information, tourism organisations could also dispense training programs for host communities and tourism facilitators on transformative leadership as well as raising awareness on the impact and benefits of creating transformative experiences, that could be later expressed into local or regional tourism focus groups including all the actors that participate into the TT process, therefore spreading the knowledge of transformative tourism. The more facilitators decide to engage into TT, the more content to be observed by researchers will become available, more partnerships between developed and developing countries could be formed, ultimately ensuring an increase in the level of comprehension, accessibility and visibility of TT on the worldwide tourism scene.
These findings showcase useful information for scholars in this field to understand the current state of knowledge amidst an overwhelming growth in literature of TT, catching a glimpse of emerging trends, terminology used, journals, authors and countries that mostly address regarding this subject, key actors that support science development in this matter, reference studies in the field along with further fruitful directions of research. Despite the inductive nature of the research not yet reaching its maturity, TT is on the right path as scholars started looking outwards, with rapidly increasing volume of new publications that are solid-based research, new methods, components and adapted-frameworks coming into the academic scene. All the results found in this study mirror the same pattern that leads to an evolution of TT in the next years as more authors, journals, publishers, and countries engage, more collaborations are formed, new methods and perspectives are being considered, different connections are discovered between TT and other disciplines, and more attention is drawn towards supporting this area of science development. Findings suggest that transformative tourism will most likely steal the scene of the tourism industry as it presents a continuous growth in interest. Yet, future studies are constantly needed to track advancements in this field, as research is a continuous process that adapts and changes over time, needing constant updates and clarifications to keep the pace with the growing rhythm of TT.
Despite the aforementioned contribution, the study has some limitations. First, even though consisting of multiple sources collected from four databases to have a better coverage on the subject, there may still be a fraction of yet undiscovered knowledge waiting to be further explored through the search of other databases as well. In spite of incorporating a timeframe of twenty-four years of knowledge in TT, the results from 2022 are considered yet to be completed as research ended on 1 May 2022. Therefore, as the trendline rhythm is constantly changing, the number of publications, citations, or collaborations will certainly experience variation towards the end of the year. As most of the literature surrounding the notion of TT is still new in the field, dimensions, such as number of citations and h-index, might considerably change over time and therefore needs to be further examined. The research algorithm also draws some limits. Although for the accuracy of the study the focus was only on journal articles, there are still a considerable number of conference proceedings, doctoral theses and books that were excluded yet that could bring more dimension to the actual state of knowledge. The conducted investigation was based on English-only articles (except few bilingual papers) as they overwhelmingly dominated the TT publications, yet underestimating research using other languages could bring a more diverse and in-depth analysis on the subject. Even if a combination of keywords consisted of general terms to generate a broader spectrum of articles and not limit the research, there might still be other combinations that could lead to other publications related to TT, and therefore other keywords and combinations must be further explored.

Author Contributions

All authors, K.A.R., Ș.D., O.R.C. and F.P. contributed equally to the research presented in this paper and to the preparation of the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lean, G.L. Transformative travel: A mobilities perspective. Tour. Stud. 2012, 12, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morgan, A.D. Journeys into transformation: Travel to an “other” place as a vehicle for transformative learning. J. Transform. Educ. 2010, 8, 246–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hwang, J.; Seo, S. A critical review of research on customer experience management: Theoretical, methodological and cultural perspectives. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 2218–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bruner, E.M. Transformation of self in tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 1991, 18, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reisinger, Y. Transformational Tourism: Tourist Perspectives; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tasci, A.D.; Godovykh, M. An empirical modeling of transformation process through trip experiences. Tour. Manag. 2021, 86, 104332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ross, S.L. Transformative travel: An enjoyable way to foster radical change. ReVision A J. Conscious. Transform. 2010, 32, 54–61. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270916763_Transformative_Travel_An_Enjoyable_Way_to_Foster_Radical_Change (accessed on 11 April 2022). [CrossRef]
  8. Pung, J.M.; Gnoth, J.; Del Chiappa, G. Tourist transformation: Towards a conceptual model. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 81, 102885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Robledo, M.A.; Batle, J. Transformational tourism as a hero’s journey. Curr. Issues Tour. 2017, 20, 1736–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coghlan, A.; Weiler, B. Examining transformative processes in volunteer tourism. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 567–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mezirow, J. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning, 1st ed.; Jossey Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kottler, J.A. Transformative travel. Futurist 1998, 32, 24–28. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/218560225/fulltextPDF/6B58F2C624DE4184PQ/1?accountid=136549 (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  13. Arnould, E.J.; Price, L.L.; Otnes, C. Making magic consumption: A study of white-water river rafting. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 1999, 28, 33–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Noy, C. This trip really changed me: Backpackers’ narratives of self-change. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004, 31, 78–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shaffer, T.S. Performing backpacking: Constructing “authenticity” every step of the way. Text Perform. Q. 2004, 24, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brown, L. The transformative power of the international sojourn: An ethnographic study of the international student experience. Ann. Tour. Res. 2009, 36, 502–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dekel, I. Ways of looking: Observation and transformation at the Holocaust Memorial, Berlin. Mem. Stud. 2009, 2, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Allman, T.L.; Mittelstaedt, R.D.; Martin, B.; Goldenberg, M. Exploring the motivations of base jumpers: Extreme sport enthusiasts. J. Sport Tour. 2009, 14, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Galliford, M. Touring “country”, sharing “home”: Aboriginal tourism, Australian tourists and the possibilities for cultural transversality. Tour. Stud. 2010, 10, 227–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyons, J. Autonomous cross-cultural hardship travel (ACHT) as a medium for growth, learning, and a deepened sense of self. World Futures 2010, 66, 286–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reisinger, Y. Connection between Travel, Tourism and Transformation. In Transformational Tourism: Tourist Perspectives; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pung, J.M.; Del Chiappa, G. An exploratory and qualitative study on the meaning of transformative tourism and its facilitators and inhibitors. Eur. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 24, 2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ourahmoune, N. Narrativity, temporality, and consumer-identity transformation through tourism. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Voigt, C.; Brown, G.; Howat, G. Wellness tourists: In search of transformation. Tour. Rev. 2011, 66, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reisinger, Y. Transformational Tourism: Host Perspectives; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sen, V.; Walter, P. Community-based ecotourism and the transformative learning of homestay hosts in Cambodia. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2020, 45, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guttentag, D. Transformative experiences via Airbnb: Is it the guests or the host communities that will be transformed? J. Tour. Futures 2019, 5, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Soulard, J.; McGehee, N.G.; Stern, M. Transformative tourism organizations and glocalization. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019, 76, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gallan, S.A.; Kabadayi, S.; Ali, F.; Helkkula, A.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y. Transformative hospitality services: A conceptualization and development of organizational dimensions. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brown, L. Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2013, 40, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muldoon, M.L. South African township residents describe the liminal potentialities of tourism. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, X.; Tanyatanaboon, M.; Lehto, X.Y. Conceptualizing transformative guest experience at retreat centers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 49, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Curtin, S.; Brown, L. Travelling with a purpose: An ethnographic study of the eudemonic experiences of volunteer expedition participants. Tour. Stud. 2018, 19, 192–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Decrop, A.; Del Chiappa, G.; Mallarge, J.; Zidda, P. Couchsurfing has made me a better person and the world a better place: The transformative power of collaborative tourism experiences. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taylor, E.W. Building Upon the Theoretical Debate: A Critical Review of the Empirical Studies of Mezirow’s Transformative Learning Theory. Adult Educ. Q. 1997, 48, 34–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pastor, D.; Kent, A.J. Transformative landscapes: Liminality and visitors’ emotional experiences at German memorial sites. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 250–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lykoudi, D.M.; Zouni, G.; Tsogas, M.M. Self-love emotion as a novel type of love for tourism destinations. Tour. Geogr. 2022, 24, 390–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Walker, J.; Manyamba, V.N. Towards an emotion-focused, discomfort-embracing transformative tourism education. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2020, 26, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sheldon, P.J. Designing tourism experiences for inner transformation. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 83, 102935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Neuhofer, B.; Celuch, K.; To, T.L. Experience design and the dimensions of transformative festival experiences. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 2881–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Neuhofer, B.; Egger, R.; Yu, J.; Celuch, K. Designing experiences in the age of human transformation: An analysis of Burning Man. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 91, 103310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fortezza, F.; Figueiredo, B.; Scaraboto, D.; Del Chiappa, G. Managing multiple logics to facilitate consumer transformation. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 144, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soulard, J.; McGehee, N.; Knollenberg, W. Developing and Testing the Transformative Travel Experience Scale (TTES). J. Travel Res. 2020, 60, 923–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Santos, M.C.; Ferreira, A.; Costa, C.; Santos, J.A.C. A Model for the Development of Innovative Tourism Products: From Service to Transformation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chirakranont, R.; Sakdiyakorn, M. Conceptualizing meaningful tourism experiences: Case study of a small craft beer brewery in Thailand. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2022, 23, 100691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Seočanac, M. Transformative experiences in nature-based tourism as a chance for improving sustainability of tourism destination. J. Econ. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 6, 1–10. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360054620_Transformative_experiences_in_nature-based_tourism_as_a_chance_for_improving_sustainability_of_tourism_destination (accessed on 23 March 2022). [CrossRef]
  47. Stone, G.A.; Duffy, L.N. Transformative Learning Theory: A Systematic Review of Travel and Tourism Scholarship. J. Teach. Travel Tour. 2015, 15, 204–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wolf, I.D.; Ainsworth, G.B.; Crowley, J. Transformative travel as a sustainable market niche for protected areas: A new development, marketing and conservation model. J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 25, 1650–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teoh, M.W.; Wang, Y.; Kwek, A. Conceptualising co-created transformative tourism experiences: A systematic narrative review. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 47, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mezirow, J. Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 1997, 1997, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sundbo, J.; Serensen, F. Handbook on the Experience Economy; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, Australia, 2013; pp. 21–44. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pine, J.B.; Gilmore, J.H. The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre. Every Business a Stage; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  53. Folmer, A.; Tengxiage, A.T.; Kadjik, H.; Wright, A.J. Exploring Chinese millennials’ experiential and transformative travel: A case study of mountain bikers in Tibet. J. Tour. Futures 2019, 5, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kim, J.-H. Determining the factors affecting the memorable nature of travel experiences. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2010, 27, 780–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alahakoon, T.; Pike, S.; Beatson, A. Transformative destination attractiveness: An exploration of salient attributes, consequences, and personal values. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2021, 38, 845–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kirillova, K.; Lehto, X.; Cai, L. Tourism and Existential Transformation: An Empirical Investigation. J. Travel Res. 2017, 56, 638–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhalla, R.; Chowdhary, N.; Ranjan, A. Spiritual tourism for psychotherapeutic healing post COVID-19. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2021, 38, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Richardson, N.; Insch, A. Enabling transformative experiences through nature-based tourism. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2021; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Walker, K.; Weiler, B. A new model for guide training and transformative outcomes: A case study in sustainable marine wildlife ecotourism. J. Ecotourism 2017, 16, 269–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Noorashid, N.; Chin, W.L. Coping with COVID-19: The Resilience and Transformation of Community-Based Tourism in Brunei Darussalam. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tomazos, K.; Butler, R. The volunteer tourist as “Hero”. Curr. Issues Tour. 2010, 13, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gaggioli, A. Transformative Experience Design. Human Computer Confluence: Transforming Human Experience Through Symbiotic Technologies; De Gruyter: Warsaw, Poland, 2015; pp. 97–122. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wright, S.; Lloyd, K.; Suchet-Pearson, S.; Burarrwanga, L.; Ganambarr, R.; Ganambarr, M.; Ganambarr, B.; Maymuru, D.; Tofa, M. Meaningful tourist transformations with Country at Bawaka, North East Arnhem Land, northern Australia. Tour. Stud. 2017, 17, 443–467. [Google Scholar]
  64. Duerden, M.D.; Lundberg, N.R.; Ward, P.; Taniguchi, S.T.; Hill, B.; Widmer, M.A.; Zabriskie, R. From ordinary to extraordinary: A framework of experience types. J. Leis. Res. 2018, 49, 196–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mezirow, J. How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  66. Campbell, J. The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 3rd ed.; New World Library: Novato, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  67. Roberson, D.N., Jr. Modern Day Explorers—The Way to a Wider World. World Leis. J. 2002, 44, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rydzik, A.; Pritchard, A.; Morgan, N.; Sedgley, D. The potential of arts-based transformative research. Ann. Tour. Res. 2013, 40, 285–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Soulard, J.; McGehee, N.G.; Stern, M.J.; Lamoureux, K.M. Transformative tourism: Tourists’ drawings, symbols, and narratives of change. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 87, 103141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chhabra, D. Transformative perspectives of tourism: Dialogical perceptiveness. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2021, 38, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Grof, S. Implications of modern consciousness research for psychology: Holotropic experiences and their healing and heuristic potential. Humanist. Psychol. 2003, 31, 50–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Reisinger, Y. Transformational Tourism: Tourist Perspectives; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; p. XII. [Google Scholar]
  73. Cohen, E. A Phenomenology of Tourist Experiences. Sociology 1979, 13, 179–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kirillova, K.; Lehto, X.; Cai, L. What triggers transformative tourism experiences? Tour. Recreat. Res. 2017, 42, 498–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Marschall, S. Transnational migrant home visits as identity practice: The case of African migrants in South Africa. Ann. Tour. Res. 2017, 63, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, C.; Kirillova, K. The formative nature of graduation travel. Ann. Tour. Res. Empir. Insights 2021, 2, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Willson, G.B.; McIntosh, A.J.; Zahra, A.L. Tourism and spirituality: A phenomenological analysis. Ann. Tour. Res. 2013, 42, 150–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rouzrokh, M.; Muldoon, M.; Torabian, P.; Mair, H. The memory-work sessions: Exploring critical pedagogy in tourism. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2017, 21, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Russell, C.A.; Levy, S.J. The Temporal and Focal Dynamics of Volitional Reconsumption: A Phenomenological Investigation of Repeated Hedonic Experiences. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 39, 341–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hottola, P. Somewhat empty meeting grounds: Travelers in South India. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014, 44, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, B.; Yang, X. I’m here for recovery: The eudaimonic wellness experiences at the Le Monastere des Augustines Wellness hotel. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2021, 38, 802–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Živoder, S.B.; Ateljević, I.; Čorak, S. Conscious travel and critical social theory meets destination marketing and management studies: Lessons learned from Croatia. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2015, 4, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, W.; Zhang, X. Online expression as Well-be(com)ing: A study of travel blogs on Nepal by Chinese female tourists. Tour. Manag. 2021, 83, 104224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pung, J.M.; Yung, R.; Khoo-Lattimore, C.; Del Chiappa, G. Transformative travel experiences and gender: A double duoethnography approach. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 23, 538–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zavitz, K.J.; Butz, D. Not That Alternative: Short-term Volunteer Tourism at an Organic Farming Project in Costa Rica. ACME 2011, 10, 412–441. Available online: https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/905/761 (accessed on 15 March 2022).
  86. Bone, J.; Bone, K. Voluntourism as cartography of self: A Deleuzian analysis of a postgraduate visit to India. Tour. Stud. 2018, 18, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bueddefeld, J.; Duerden, M.D. The transformative tourism learning model. Ann. Tour. Res. 2022, 94, 103405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Radel, K.; Hillman, W. Not ‘On Vacation’: Survival Escapist Travel as an Agent of Transformation. In Transformational Tourism: Tourist Perspectives; Reisinger, Y., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 33–51. [Google Scholar]
  89. Thomas, P.; van Nieuwerburgh, C. The lived experience of long-term overland travel. Ann. Tour. Res. Empirical Insights 2022, 3, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Arnould, E.; Price, L.L. River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 24–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dillette, A.K.; Douglas, A.C.; Andrzejewski, C. Yoga tourism—A catalyst for transformation? Ann. Leis. Res. 2019, 22, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Morse, W.C.; Stern, M.; Blahna, D.; Stein, T. Recreation as a transformative experience: Synthesizing the literature on outdoor recreation and recreation ecosystem services into a systems framework. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2022, 38, 100492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Varley, P.; Medway, D. Ecosophy and tourism: Rethinking a mountain resort. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Walter, R.G. Catalysts for transformative learning in community-based ecotourism. Curr. Issues Tour. 2016, 19, 1356–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Henderson, J.; Jepson, N. Critical transformations and global development: Materials for a new analytical framework. Area Dev. Policy 2018, 3, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Little, J. Transformational Tourism, Nature and Wellbeing: New Perspectives on Fitness and the Body. Sociol. Ruralis 2012, 52, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Buzinde, C.; Choi, Y.; Wang, A.Y. Tourism Representations of Chinese Cosmology: The Case of Feng Shui Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 975–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, J.Y.; Paek, S.; Kim, T.T.; Lee, T.H. Health tourism Needs for healing experience and intentions for transformation in wellness resorts in Korea. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. 2015, 27, 1881–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rodrigues, S.; McIntosh, A. Motivations, experiences and perceived impacts of visitation at a Catholic monastery in New Zealand. J. Herit. Tour. 2014, 9, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rowen, I. The transformational festival as a subversive toolbox for a transformed tourism: Lessons from Burning Man for a COVID-19 world. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Allen, P. Transformative experiences in political life. J. Polit. Philos. 2017, 25, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sterchele, D. Memorable tourism experiences and their consequences: An interaction ritual (IR) theory approach. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 81, 102847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Walker, K.; Moscardo, G. Moving beyond sense of place to care of place: The role of Indigenous values and interpretation in promoting transformative change in tourists’ place images and personal values. J. Sustain. Tour. 2016, 24, 1243–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yang, E.C.L.; Khoo-Lattimore, C.; Arcodia, C. Power and empowerment: How Asian solo female travellers perceive and negotiate risks. Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Laing, J.H.; Crouch, G.I. Lone wolves? Isolation and solitude within the frontier travel experience. Geogr. Ann. A Phys. Geogr. 2009, 91, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Powell, R.B.; Brownlee, M.T.J.; Kellert, S.R.; Ham, S.H. From awe to satisfaction: Immediate affective responses to the Antarctic tourism experience. Polar Rec. 2012, 48, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bosangit, C.; Hibbert, S.; McCabe, S. “If I was going to die I should at least be having fun”: Travel blogs, meaning and tourist experience. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015, 55, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Coetzee, W.J.L.; Liu, X.N.; Filep, C.V. Transformative potential of events—The case of gay ski week in Queenstown, New Zealand. Tour. Rev. 2019, 74, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Danby, P.; Grajfoner, D. Human–Equine Tourism and Nature-Based Solutions: Exploring Psychological Well-Being Through Transformational Experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2022, 46, 607–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dimitrovski, D.; Đurađević, M.; Senić, V.; Kostić, M. A joyful river ride: A transformative event experience. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2022, 39, 100502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xu, J.B.; Lo, A.; Wu, J. Pleasure or pain or both? Exploring working holiday experiences through the lens of transformative learning theory. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 48, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Magrizos, S.; Kostopoulos, I.; Powers, L. Volunteer Tourism as a Transformative Experience: A Mixed Methods Empirical Study. J. Travel Res. 2021, 60, 878–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vidon, E.S.; Rickly, J.M. Alienation and anxiety in tourism motivation. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 69, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kirillova, K.; Lehto, X.; Cai, L. Existential Authenticity and Anxiety as Outcomes: The Tourist in the Experience Economy. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 19, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sharma, N.; Rickly, J. ‘The smell of death and the smell of life’: Authenticity, anxiety and perceptions of death at Varanasi’s cremation grounds. J. Herit. Tour. 2019, 14, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dean, A.K. The enchanted snake and the forbidden fruit: The ayahuasca ‘fairy tale’ tourist. J. Mark. Manag. 2019, 35, 818–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hosany, S.; Hunter-Jones, P.; McCabe, S. Emotions in tourist experiences: Advancing our conceptual, methodological and empirical understanding. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2020, 16, 100444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kontogeorgopoulos, N. Finding oneself while discovering others: An existential perspective on volunteer tourism in Thailand. Ann. Tour. Res. 2017, 65, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wu, S.; Li, Y.; Wood, E.H.; Senaux, B.; Dai, G. Liminality and festivals—Insights from the East. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 80, 102810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhao, X.; Liu, X. Sustaining Faculty Development through Visiting Scholar Programmes: A Transformative Learning Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ulusoy, E. Experiential responsible consumption. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Koskela-Huotari, K.; Patrício, L.; Zhang, J.; Karpen, I.O.; Sangiorgi, D.; Anderson, L.; Bogicevic, V. Service system transformation through service design: Linking analytical dimensions and service design approaches. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 136, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wolf, I.D.; Stricker, H.K.; Hagenloh, G. Outcome-focused national park experience management: Transforming participants, promoting social well-being, and fostering place attachment. J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 358–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Robinson, D. Rural Food and Wine Tourism in Canada’s South Okanagan Valley: Transformations for Food Sovereignty? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Barker, H.M. Global-Service Learning and Student-Athletes: A Model for Enhanced Academic Inclusion at the University of Washington. Ann. Glob. Health 2017, 82, 1070–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Brown, S.L. Intentional Community: An Anthropological Perspective; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  127. Lemmi, E.; Sacco, L.P.; Crociata, A.; Agovino, M. The Lucca Comics and Games Festival as a platform for transformational cultural tourism: Evidence from the perceptions of residents. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 27, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Godovykh, M.; Tasci, A.D.A. Customer experience in tourism: A review of definitions, components, and measurements. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 35, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yan, A.; Jia, W. The influence of eliciting awe on pro-environmental behavior of tourist in religious tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 48, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wassler, P.; Kuteynikova, M. Living travel vulnerability: A phenomenological study. Tour. Manag. 2020, 76, 103967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Waterman, A. The humanistic psychology–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. Am. Psychol. 2013, 68, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Maslow, A.H. Cognition of being in the peak experiences. J. Genet. Psychol. 1959, 94, 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Matteucci, X. Existential hapax as tourist embodied transformation. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2021; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Foronda, C.; Belknap, R. Short of transformation: American ADN students’ thoughts, feelings, and experiences of studying abroad in a low-income country. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2012, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Boateng, H.; Okoe, A.F.; Hinson, R.E. Dark tourism: Exploring tourist’s experience at the Cape Coast Castle, Ghana. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 27, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nada, C.I.; Montgomery, C.; Araújo, H.C. ‘You went to Europe and returned different’: Transformative learning experiences of international students in Portugal. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 2018, 17, 696–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lukoff, M.M. Immersion in Indigenous Agriculture and Transformational Learning. Anthropol. Humanism 2018, 43, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tamashiro, R. Planetary Consciousness, Witnessing the Inhuman, and Transformative Learning: Insights from Peace Pilgrimage Oral Histories and Autoethnographies. Religions 2018, 9, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Manniche, J.; Larsen, K.T.; Broegaard, R.B. The circular economy in tourism: Transition perspectives for business and research. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 21, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fotiou, E. The Importance of Ritual Discourse in Framing Ayahuasca Experiences in the Context of Shamanic Tourism. Anthropol. Conscious. 2020, 31, 223–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mkono, M. The reflexive tourist. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 57, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fedele, A. Energy and transformation in alternative pilgrimages to Catholic shrines: Deconstructing the tourist/pilgrim divide. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2014, 12, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Park, S.Y.; Pan, B.; Ahn, J.B. Family trip and academic achievement in early childhood. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 80, 102795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kujawa, J. Spiritual tourism as a quest. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 24, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mezirow, J. Perspective transformation. Adult Educ. Q. 1978, 28, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Grabowski, S.; Wearing, S.; Lyons, K.; Tarrant, M.; Landon, A. A rite of passage? Exploring youth transformation and global citizenry in the study abroad experience. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2017, 42, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Laing, J.H.; Frost, W. Journeys of well-being: Women’s travel narratives of transformation and self-discovery in Italy. Tour. Manag. 2017, 62, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Noy, C. Performing Identity: Touristic Narratives of Self-Change. Text Perform. Q. 2004, 24, 115–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Volo, S. Eudaimonic well-being of islanders: Does tourism contribute? The case of the Aeolian Archipelago. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2017, 6, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Sampaio, S. Watching narratives of travel-as-transformation in The Beach and The Motorcycle Diaries. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2014, 12, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Abreu, R.G.; Casotti, L.M. Travels and Transformation of the Existential Condition: Narratives and Representations in Films Starring the Elderly. Rev. Bras. Pesqui. Tur. 2020, 14, 14–31. [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhang, Y. Unpacking visitors’ experiences at dark tourism sites of natural disasters. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 40, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Valente, K.G.; Hornby, S.M. Celebrating is remembering: OUTing the Past as a study in the reflective and transformative potential of small events. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events, 2022; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Schneller, A.J.; Coburn, S. For-profit environmental voluntourism in Costa Rica: Teen volunteer, host community, and environmental outcomes. J. Sustain. Tour. 2018, 26, 832–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nikjoo, A.; Markwell, K.; Nikbin, M.; Hernández-Lara, A.B. The flag-bearers of change in a patriarchal Muslim society: Narratives of Iranian solo female travelers on Instagram. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 38, 100817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. McWha, M.; Frost, W.; Laing, J. Travel writers and the nature of self: Essentialism, transformation and (online) construction. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 70, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Fu, X.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z. Creating a balanced family travel experience: A perspective from the motivation-activities-transformative learning chain. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 41, 100941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Filep, S.; Deery, M. Towards a Picture of Tourists’ Happiness. J. Tour. Anal. 2010, 15, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Breiby, M.A.; Duedahl, E.; Øian, H.; Ericsson, B. Exploring sustainable experiences in tourism. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2020, 20, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mathijsen, A. Home, sweet home? Understanding diasporic medical tourism behaviour. Exploratory research of polish immigrants in Belgium. Tour. Manag. 2019, 72, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Little, J. Nature, wellbeing and the transformational self. Geogr. J. 2014, 181, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. O’Reilly, C.C. From drifter to gap year tourist: Mainstreaming backpacker travel. Ann. Tour. Res. 2006, 33, 998–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Brymer, E.; Schweitzer, R.D. Evoking the ineffable: The phenomenology of extreme sports. Psychol. Conscious Theory Res. Pract. 2017, 4, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Brooks, C. The transformative potential of community-created consent culture. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 2020, 12, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Becker, E. Tour-guiding as a pious place-making practice: The case of the Sehitlik Mosque, Berlin. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 73, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Johnson, L.B. Becoming ‘enchanted’ in agro-food spaces: Engaging relational frameworks and photo elicitation with farm tour experiences. Gend. Place Cult. 2018, 25, 1646–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Everingham, P.; Peters, A.; Higgins-Desbiolles, F. The (im)possibilities of doing tourism otherwise: The case of settler colonial Australia and the closure of the climb at Uluru. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 88, 103178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Litzelman, D.K.; Gardner, A.; Einterz, R.M.; Owiti, P.; Wambui, C.; Huskins, J.C.; Schmitt-Wendholt, K.M.; Stone, G.S.; Ayuo, P.O.; Inui, T.S.; et al. On Becoming a Global Citizen: Transformative Learning Through Global Health Experiences. Ann. Glob. Health 2017, 83, 596–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Bell, H.L.; Gibson, H.J.; Tarrant, M.A.; Perry, L.G.; Stoner, L. Transformational learning through study abroad: US students’ reflections on learning about sustainability in the South Pacific. Leis. Stud. 2016, 35, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Inversini, A.; Rega, I.; Gan, S.W. The transformative learning nature of malaysian homestay experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 51, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hakio, K.; Mattelmäki, T. Future Skills of Design for Sustainability: An Awareness-Based Co-Creation Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Walter, P.G.; Reimer, J.K. The “ecotourism curriculum” and visitor learning in community-based ecotourism: Case studies from Thailand and Cambodia. Asia Pacific J. Tour. Res. 2012, 17, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Phi, G.T.; Dredge, D. Collaborative tourism-making: An interdisciplinary review of co-creation and a future research agenda. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2019, 44, 284–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Galeone, A.; Sebastiani, R. Transformative Service Research in Hospitality. Tour. Manag. 2021, 87, 104366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Magee, R.; Gilmore, A. Heritage site management: From dark tourism to transformative service experience? Serv. Ind. J. 2015, 35, 898–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Parsons, H.; Mackenzie, S.H.; Filep, S. Facilitating self-development: How tour guides broker spiritual tourist experiences. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2019, 44, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ormond, M.; Vietti, F. Beyond multicultural ‘tolerance’: Guided tours and guidebooks as transformative tools for civic learning. J. Sustain. Tour. 2022, 30, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Cavender, R.C.; Swanson, J.R.; Wright, K. Transformative travel: Transformative learning through education abroad in a niche tourism destination. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2020, 27, 100245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sigala, M. New technologies in tourism: From multi-disciplinary to anti-disciplinary advances and trajectories. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 25, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Grundner, L.; Neuhofer, B. The bright and dark sides of artificial intelligence: A futures perspective on tourist destination experiences. J. Dest. Mark. Manag. 2021, 19, 100511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Carpenter, K. Childhood studies and orphanage tourism in Cambodia. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015, 55, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ponte, J.; Couto, G.; Sousa, A.; Pimentel, P.; Oliveira, A. Idealizing adventure tourism experiences: Tourists’ self-assessment and expectations. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2021, 35, 100379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Flaherty, J.; Day, J.; Crerar, A. Uncertainty, story-telling and transformative learning: An instructor’s experience of TEFI’s Walking Workshop in Nepal. J. Teach. Travel Tour. 2019, 19, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Prince, S. Working towards sincere encounters in volunteer tourism: An ethnographic examination of key management issues at a Nordic eco-village. J. Sustain. Tour. 2017, 25, 1617–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wong, I.K.A.; Ma, J.; Xiong, X. Touristic experience at a nomadic sporting event: Craving cultural connection, sacredness, authenticity, and nostalgia. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 44, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Christie, M.F.; Mason, P.A. Transformative Tour Guiding: Training Tour Guides to be Critically Reflective Practitioners. J. Ecotourism 2003, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Stone, G.A.; Duerden, M.D.; Duffy, L.N.; Hill, B.J.; Witesman, E.M. Measurement of transformative learning in study abroad: An application of the learning activities survey. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2017, 21, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Jelinčić, D.A.; Matečić, I. Broken but Well: Healing Dimensions of Cultural Tourism Experiences. Sustainability 2021, 13, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, 1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ramos-Rodríguez, A.; Ruíz-Navarro, J. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25, 981–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hall, M.C. Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Wang, L.; Lyu, J. Inspiring awe through tourism and its consequence. Ann. Tour. Res. 2019, 77, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Gardiner, S.; Vada, S.; Yang, E.C.L.; Khoo, C.; Le, T.H. Recreating history: The evolving negotiation of staged authenticity in tourism experiences. Tour. Manag. 2022, 91, 104515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. De Regt, A.; Plangger, K.; Barnes, S.J. Transforming experiences from story-telling to story-doing. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 136, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Irimiás, A.; Mitev, A.; Michalkó, G. Narrative transportation and travel: The mediating role of escapism and immersion. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 38, 100793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Sie, L.; Pegg, S.; Phelan, K.V. Senior tourists’ self-determined motivations, tour preferences, memorable experiences and subjective well-being: An integrative hierarchical model. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 47, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Anderson, M.H. How can we know what we think until we see what we said? A citation and citation context analysis of Karl Wieck’s, ‘The Social Psychology of Organizing’. Organ. Stud. 2006, 27, 1675–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Ellegard, O.; Wallin, J.A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics 2015, 105, 1809–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Echchakoui, S.; Barka, N. Industry 4.0 and its impact in plastics industry: A literature review. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2020, 20, 100172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. An introduction to infometrics. Inf. Process. Manag. 1992, 28, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Galvani, A.; Lew, A.A.; Perez, M.S. COVID-19 is expanding global consciousness and the sustainability of travel and tourism. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Sigala, M. Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Zupic, I.; Čater, T. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organ. Res. Methods 2015, 18, 429–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Stone, M.J.; Petrick, J.F. The Educational Benefits of Travel Experiences: A Literature Review. J. Travel Res. 2013, 52, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Weaver, D.B. Asymmetrical Dialectics of Sustainable Tourism: Toward Enlightened Mass Tourism. J. Travel Res. 2014, 53, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Coghlan, A.; Gooch, M. Applying a transformative learning framework to volunteer tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 713–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Acedo, F.J.; Barroso, C.; Casanueva, C.; Galan, J.L. Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 957–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Sedgley, D.; Pritchard, A.; Morgan, N. Tourism and ageing: A transformative research agenda. Ann. Tour. Res. 2011, 38, 422–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Minnaert, L. Social tourism participation: The role of tourism inexperience and uncertainty. Tour. Manag. 2014, 40, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Freund, D.; Iñesta, A.; Castelló, M. Tourism for all. Educating to foster accessible accommodation. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2022, 30, 100370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Foster, C.; McCabe, S. The role of liminality in residential activity camps. Tour. Stud. 2015, 15, 46–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Moin, S.M.A.; Hosany, S.; O’Brien, J. Storytelling in destination brands’ promotional videos. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 100639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Veréb, V.; Azevedo, A. A quasi-experiment to map innovation perception and pinpoint innovation opportunities along the tourism experience journey. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 41, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Liutikas, D. The manifestation of values and identity in travelling: The social engagement of pilgrimage. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 24, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Mkhize, S.L.; Ivanovic, M. Building the Case for Transformative Tourism in South Africa. African J. Hosp. Tour. Leis. 2020, 9, 717–731. Available online: https://www.ajhtl.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_22_9_4__717-731.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2022).
  218. Collinson, E.; Baxter, I. Liminality and contemporary engagement: Knockando Wool Mill—A cultural heritage case study. J. Herit. Tour. 2022, 17, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Mkhize, S.L.; Ivanovic, M. The revealing case of Cultural Creatives as transmodern tourists in Soweto, South Africa. GeoJ. Tour. Geosites 2019, 26, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Scherrer, P.; Doohan, K. It’s not about believing’: Exploring the transformative potential of cultural acknowledgement in an Indigenous tourism context. Asia Pac. Viewp. 2013, 54, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Spicer-Escalante, J.P. Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara, Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War, and the politics of guerrilla travel writing. Stud. Travel Writ. 2011, 15, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Ross, S.L.; Hur, J.Y.C.; Hoffman, J. Temple Stay-cation: Opportunities During and Beyond Pandemic Conditions. J. Tour. Sport Manag. 2021, 4, 357–364. Available online: https://www.scitcentral.com/documents/b716dd54880dc9ea85fabda7f35639b0.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2022).
  223. Vidickienė, D.; Vilkė, R.; Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Z. Transformative tourism as an innovative tool for rural development. Eur. Countrys. 2020, 12, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Beaulieu-Prévost, D.; Cormier, M.; Heller, S.M.; Nelson-Gal, D.; McRae, K. Welcome to Wonderland? A Popular Study of Intimate Experiences and Safe Sex at a Transformational Mass Gathering (Burning Man). Arch. Sex. Behav. 2019, 48, 2055–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Tham, A. Asian solo male travelling mobilities—An autoethnography. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2020, 14, 453–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Lopes, T.M.; Palrão, T.; Rodrigues, R.I. Creativity as an opportunity to stimulate a cognitive approach to tourist demand. Front Psychol. 2021, 12, 711930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Matteucci, X.; Filep, S. Eudaimonic tourist experience: The case of flamenco. Leis. Stud. 2017, 36, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Bertella, G.; Vidmar, B. Learning to face global food challenges through tourism experiences. J. Tour. Futures 2019, 5, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Naor, L.; Mayseless, O. How Personal Transformation Occurs Following a Single Peak Experience in Nature: A Phenomenological Account. J. Humanist. Psychol. 2020, 60, 865–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Qiu, M.; Sha, J.; Scott, N. Restoration of Visitors through Nature-Based Tourism: A Systematic Review, Conceptual Framework, and Future Research Directions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Wielenga, B. New experiences in nature areas: Architecture as a tool to stimulate transformative experiences among visitors in nature areas? J. Tour. Futures, 2021; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Force, A.; Manuel-Navarrete, D.; Benessaiah, K. Tourism and transitions toward sustainability: Developing tourists’ pro-sustainability agency. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Hitchner, S.; Schelhas, Z.; Brosius, P.J.; Nibbelink, N.P. Zen and the Art of the Selfie Stick: Blogging the John Muir Trail Thru-Hiking Experience. Environ. Commun. 2019, 13, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Lindberg, F.; Østergaard, P. Extraordinary consumer experiences: Why immersion and transformation cause trouble. J. Consum. Behav. 2015, 14, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Vidickienė, D.; Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Z.; Vilkė, R.; Chmielinski, P.; Zobena, A. Barriers to start and develop transformative ecotourism business. Eur. Countrys. 2021, 13, 734–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Kunjuraman, V.; Hussin, R. Social Transformations of Rural Communities Through Ecotourism: A Systematic Review. J. Tour. Hosp. Culin. Arts 2017, 9, 54–66. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183073520 (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  237. Lackey, Q.N.; Pennisi, L. Ecotour guide training program methods and characteristics: A case study from the African bush. J. Ecotourism 2020, 19, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Seeler, S.; Lück, M.; Schänzel, H. Paradoxes and actualities of off-the-beaten-track tourists. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Aall, C. Sustainable Tourism in Practice: Promoting or Perverting the Quest for a Sustainable Development? Sustainability 2014, 6, 2562–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Song, Y.; Yan, L. “Who is Buddha? I am Buddha.”—The motivations and experiences of Chinese young adults attending a Zen meditation camp in Taiwan. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2020, 21, 263–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Taheri, B. Emotional Connection, Materialism, and Religiosity: An Islamic Tourism Experience. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2016, 33, 1011–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Thomas, S.; White, G.R.T.; Samuel, A. To pray and to play: Post-postmodern pilgrimage at Lourdes. Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Husemann, K.C.; Eckhardt, G.M.; Grohs, R.; Saceanu, R.E. The dynamic interplay between structure, anastructure and antistructure in extraordinary experiences. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 3361–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. de Sousa, T.M.; da Rosa, A.P. Faith, entertainment, and conflicts on the Camino de Santiago (The Way of St. James): A case study on the mediatization of the pilgrimage experience on Facebook groups. Essachess 2017, 10, 145–169. Available online: https://doaj.org/article/8c0374daaf7a49258c9c9615bdbe5b25 (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  245. Serrallonga, S.A. Pilgrim’s Motivations: A Theoretical Approach to Pilgrimage as a Peacebuilding Tool. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2020, 8, 58–74. [Google Scholar]
  246. Zhang, K.; Labajo, V.; Ramos, I.; del Valle-Brena, A.G. A Guest at Home: The experience of Chinese Pilgrims on the Camino de Santiago. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Warfield, H.A.; Baker, S.B.; Foxx, S.B.P. The therapeutic value of pilgrimage: A grounded theory study. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2014, 17, 860–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Brumer, S. The Camino de Santiago in Late Modernity: Examining Transformative Aftereffects of the Pilgrimage Experience. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2021, 9, 57–71. [Google Scholar]
  249. Al-Ajarma, K. After Haji: Muslim Pilgrims Refashioning Themselves. Religions 2021, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Dowson, R. Biker Revs’ on Pilgrimage: Motorbiking Vicars Visiting Sacred Sites. Religions 2021, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Prayag, G.; Mura, P.; Hall, M.; Fontaine, J. Drug or spirituality seekers? Consuming ayahuasca. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015, 52, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Lopez, L.; González, R.C.L.; Fernández, B.M.C. Spiritual tourism on the way of Saint James the current situation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 24, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Yanata, K. What Makes Tourists’ Experience Spiritual? A Case Study of a Buddhist Sacred Site in Koyasan, Japan. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2021, 9, 4–21. [Google Scholar]
  254. Mourtazina, E. Beyond the horizon of words: Silent landscape experience within spiritual retreat tourism. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2020, 14, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Choe, J.; O’Regan, M. Faith manifest: Spiritual and Mindfulness Tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Religions 2020, 11, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Willson, G. Spiritual awakening leading to a search for meaning through travel. Int. J. Tour. Spiritual. 2017, 2, 10–23. Available online: http://ijtcs.usc.ac.ir/article_46881_fd30c0e2baba00e8a62b8db9491ff976.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2022).
  257. Norman, A.; Pokorny, J.J. Meditation retreats: Spiritual tourism well-being interventions. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 24, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Holladay, P.J. Transformative Potential of a Short-term Mission Trip Experience. Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr. 2018, 6, 29–36. Available online: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ijrtp/vol6/iss3/5 (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  259. Lewis-Cameron, A.; Brown-Williams, T.; Jordan-Miller, L.A. Transformative Tourism Curriculum: Perspectives from Caribbean Millennials. J. East. Caribb. Stud. 2020, 45, 43–67. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/9077dc588742c85189d312b2e1fdd2ce/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=38731 (accessed on 11 March 2022).
  260. Young, T.; Hanley, J.; Lyons, K.D. Mediating global citizenry: A study of facilitator-educators at an Australian university. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2017, 42, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Bolderston, A.; Morgan, S. Global Impact: An Examination of a Caribbean Radiation Therapy Student Placement at a Canadian Teaching Hospital. J. Med. Imaging. Radiat. Sci. 2010, 41, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Patterson, T. The Transformative Power of Travel? Four Social Studies Teachers Reflect on Their International Professional Development. Theory Res. Soc. Educ. 2015, 43, 345–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Wee, D. Generation Z talking: Transformative experience in educational travel. J. Tour. Futures 2019, 5, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Zhang, H.; Gibson, H.J. Long-Term Impact of Study Abroad on Sustainability-Related Attitudes and Behaviors. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Gambrell, J.A. Travel for Transformation: Embracing a Counter-Hegemonic Approach to Transformative Learning in Study Abroad. J. Multicult. Aff. 2018, 3. Available online: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/jma/vol3/iss1/1 (accessed on 8 March 2022).
  266. Gambrell, J.A. A critical race analysis of travel for transformation: Pedagogy for the privileged or vehicle for critical social transformation? J. Ethnogr. Qual. Res. 2016, 11, 99–116. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258387 (accessed on 10 March 2022).
  267. Hall, T.; Gray, T.; Downey, G.; Sheringham, C.; Jones, B.; Power, A.; Truong, S. Jafari and Transformation: A model to enhance short-term overseas study tours. Front. Interdiscip. J. Study Abroad 2016, 27, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Ong, F.; King, B.; Lockstone-Binney, L.; Junek, O. Global global, acting local: Volunteer tourists as prospective community builders. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2018, 43, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  269. Müller, C.V.; Scheffer, A.B.B.; Closs, L.Q. Volunteer tourism, transformative learning and its impacts on careers: The case of Brazilian volunteers. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 22, 726–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Schedneck, B. Beyond the glittering golden Buddha statues: Difference and self-transformation through Buddhist volunteer tourism in Thailand. Journeys J. Travel Travel Writ. 2017, 18, 57–78. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173260365 (accessed on 23 March 2022). [CrossRef]
  271. Knollenberg, W.; McGehee, N.G.; Boley, B.B.; Clemmons, D. Motivation-based transformative learning and potential volunteer tourists: Facilitating more sustainable outcomes. J. Sustain. Tour. 2014, 22, 922–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Abreu, J.; Ferreira, M.R.; Casais, B. Empowering the Community or Escape Daily Routine—A Voluntourism Perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Molz, J.G. Making a difference together: Discourses of transformation in family voluntourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2016, 24, 805–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Lehto, X.Y.; Lehto, M.R. Vacation as a Public Health Resource: Toward a Wellness Centered Tourism Design Approach. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2019, 43, 935–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Pope, E. Tourism and wellbeing: Transforming people and places. Int. J. Spa Wellness 2018, 1, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Bowers, H.; Cheer, J.M. Yoga tourism: Commodification and western embracement of eastern spiritual practice. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 24, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. McCartney, P. Stretching into the Shadows: Unlikely Alliances, Strategic Syncretism, and De-Post-Colonizing Yogaland’s ‘Yogatopia(s)’. Asian Ethnol. 2019, 78, 373–401. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337907197_Stretching_into_the_Shadows_Unlikely_Alliances_Strategic_Syncretism_and_De-Post-Colonizing_Yogaland’s_Yogatopias (accessed on 7 March 2022).
  278. Soltani, S.; Ghorbanian, M.; Tham, A. South to South Medical Tourists, the Liminality of Iran? J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 22, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Anderson, J.; Erskine, K. Tropophilia: A Study of People, Place and Lifestyle Travel. Mobilities 2014, 9, 130–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Deville, A.; Wearing, S.; McDonald, M. WWOOFing in Australia: Ideas and lessons for a de-commodified sustainability tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2016, 24, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Cajiao, D.; Leung, Y.; Larson, L.R.; Tejedo, P.; Benayas, J. Tourists’ motivations, learning, and trip satisfaction facilitate pro-environmental outcomes of the Antarctic tourist experience. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2022, 37, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Nash, M.; Moore, R. An evaluation of a leadership development programme for women in STEMM in Antarctica. Polar J. 2018, 8, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Burwell, J. Imagining the beyond: The social and political fashioning of outer space. Space Policy 2019, 48, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Drinkwater, K.; Massullo, B.; Dagnall, N.; Laythe, B.; Boone, J.; Houran, J. Understanding Consumer Enchantment via Paranormal Tourism: Part I—Conceptual Review. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2022, 63, 195–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Ponting, S.S. Birth country travel and adoptee identity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2022, 93, 103354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Heimtun, B.; Morgan, N. Proposing paradigm peace: Mixed methods in feminist tourism research. Tour. Stud. 2012, 12, 287–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Oddou, G.; Mendenhall, M.E.; Ritchie, B.J. Leveraging Travel as a Tool for Global Leadership Development. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2000, 39, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Stankov, U.; Gretzel, U. Tourism 4.0 technologies and tourist experiences: A human-centered design perspective. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2020, 22, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Batle, J.; Robledo, M.A. Systemic crisis, weltschmerz and tourism: Meaning without incense during vacations. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 1386–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Mani, G.; Jose, S. Solo Travel: A Transformative Experience for Women. Empower- J. Soc. Work 2020, 1, 44–56. Available online: http://kaps.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Solo-Travel-A-Transformative-Experience-for-Women-by-Gilda-Mani-and-Sonny-Jose.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  291. Chen, G.; Huang, S.; Hu, X. Backpacker Personal Development, Generalized Self-Efficacy, and Self-Esteem: Testing a Structural Model. J. Travel Res. 2019, 58, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Fozdar, F. Social Transformation and the Individual: Opportunities and Limitations. J. Intercult. Stud. 2018, 39, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Light, D.; Brown, L. Dwelling-mobility: A theory of the existential pull between home and away. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 81, 102880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Ivanovich, M.; Saayman, M. Authentic economy shaping transmodern tourism experience. Afr. J. Phys. Health Educ. Recreat. Dance 2015, 21, 24–36. Available online: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC182970 (accessed on 27 March 2022).
  295. Ross, S.L. The Making of Everyday Heroes: Women Experiences with Transformation and Integration. J. Humanist. Psychol. 2019, 59, 499–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Ateljevic, I. Transforming the (tourism) world for good and (re)generating the potential ‘new normal’. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Filep, S.; Laing, J. Trends and Directions in Tourism and Positive Psychology. J. Travel Res. 2019, 58, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Irimiás, A.; Mitev, A.; Michalkó, G. The multidimensional realities of mediatized places: The transformative role of tour guides. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2021, 19, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Sampaio, S.; Simoni, V.; Isnart, C. Tourism and transformation: Negotiating metaphors, experiencing change. J. Tour. Cult. Change 2014, 12, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Canosa, A. The role of travel and mobility in processes of identity formation among the Positanesi. Tour. Stud. 2014, 14, 182–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Tussyadiah, I.P.; Sigala, M. Shareable tourism: Tourism marketing in the sharing economy. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Nawjin, J.; Biran, A. Negative emotions in tourism: A meaningful analysis. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 22, 2386–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Huijbens, E.H.; Jóhannesson, G.T. Tending to destinations: Conceptualising tourism’s transformative capacities. Tour. Stud. 2019, 19, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Lengyel, A. Authenticity, mindfulness and destination liminoidity: A multi-level model. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2022, 47, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Amrhein, S.; Hospers, G.; Reiser, D. Transformative Effects of Overtourism and COVID-19-Caused Reduction of Tourism on Residents—An Investigation of the Anti-Overtourism Movement on the Island of Mallorca. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Ngo, T.; Pham, T. Indigenous residents, tourism knowledge exchange and situated perceptions of tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Kottler, J.A. The Therapeutic Benefits of Structured Travel Experiences. J. Clin. Act. Assign. Handouts Psychother. Pract. 2001, 1, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Crossley, E. Temporality and biography in tourism: A qualitative longitudinal approach. J. Qual. Res. Tour. 2020, 1, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Yang, E.C.L. What motivates and hinders people from travelling alone? A study of solo and non-solo travellers. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 2458–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transformative tourism dimensions.
Figure 1. Transformative tourism dimensions.
Sustainability 14 11027 g001
Figure 2. The modified PRISMA chart to support the research procedure.
Figure 2. The modified PRISMA chart to support the research procedure.
Sustainability 14 11027 g002
Figure 3. Annual number of publications in the field of Transformative Tourism (1998–2022).
Figure 3. Annual number of publications in the field of Transformative Tourism (1998–2022).
Sustainability 14 11027 g003
Figure 4. Co-authorship analysis on TT (2014–2020).
Figure 4. Co-authorship analysis on TT (2014–2020).
Sustainability 14 11027 g004
Figure 5. Display of co-occurrences in transformative tourism.
Figure 5. Display of co-occurrences in transformative tourism.
Sustainability 14 11027 g005
Table 1. Geographic distribution of publications on TT.
Table 1. Geographic distribution of publications on TT.
RegionsArticlesCountries
Europe121United Kingdom (40); Italy (10); Portugal (10); Spain (8); Austria (6); The Netherlands (5); Finland (4); Germany (4); Norway (4); Croatia (3); France (3); Ireland (3); Lithuania (3); Poland (3); Sweden (3); Denmark (2); Hungary (2); Switzerland (2); Belgium (1); Greece (1); Iceland (1); Latvia (1); Serbia (1); Slovenia (1)
North America84United States (73); Canada (11)
Oceania61Australia (49); New Zealand (12)
Asia and Pacific33China (13); Hong Kong (4); Malaysia (3); Thailand (3); India (2); Japan (2); Singapore (2); Indonesia (1); Myanmar (1); Vietnam (1); South Korea (1)
Africa10South Africa (8); Ghana (1); Kenya (1)
Middle East6Israel (3); Iran (2); Jerusalem (1)
South America6Brazil (3); Trinidad and Tobago (2); Ecuador (1)
Table 2. Citation structure in transformative tourism.
Table 2. Citation structure in transformative tourism.
TCTP WOS%TP EBSCO%TP SD%TP GS%
≥50000000020.8
≥30020.90022.641.7
≥20000000052.1
≥10052.222.445.2166.7
≥50146.133.633.94117.1
≥252812.11214.51722.13715.4
≥104419.11214.51722.14317.9
≥53013.01315.71013.03112.9
<55523.82125.31823.44719.6
05322.92024.167.8145.8
Total articles2311008310077100240100
Total citations43901001186100263510011,918100
Abbreviations: TC = Total number of citations; TP = Total publications; WOS = Web of Science; SD = Science Direct; GS = Google Scholar; % = Percentage of total articles.
Table 3. Most impactful publications.
Table 3. Most impactful publications.
WOSTitleAuthorsJournalTCC/Y
1.Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research [203]Sigala, M.Journal of Business Research398199
2.This trip really changed me: Backpackers’ Narratives of Self-Change [14]Noy, C.Annals of Tourism Research34519.16
3.Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity [30]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research17018.88
4.The transformative power of the international sojourn: an ethnographic study of the international student experience [16]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research15612
5.The Educational Benefits of Travel Experiences: A Literature Review [205]Stone, M.J; Petrick, J.F.Journal of Travel Research12013.33
EBSCOTitleAuthorsJournalTCC/Y
1.Applying a transformative learning framework to volunteer tourism [207]Coghlan, A.; Gooch, M.Journal of Sustainable
Tourism
11110.09
2.The Educational Benefits of Travel Experiences: A Literature Review [205]Stone, M.J; Petrick, J.F.Journal of Travel Research10511.66
3.Making magic consumption: A study of white-water river rafting [13]Arnould, E.; Price, L.; Otnes, C.Journal of ContemporaryEthnography853.69
4.Asymmetrical Dialectics of Sustainable Tourism: Toward Enlightened Mass Tourism [206]Weaver, D.B.Journal of Travel Research779.62
5.Exploring the Motivations of BASE JUMPERS: Extreme Sport Enthusiasts [18]Allman, T, L. et al.Journal of Sport & Tourism644.92
SDTitleAuthorsJournalTCC/Y
1.Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research [203]Sigala, M.Journal of Business Research470235
2.This trip really changed me: Backpackers’ Narratives of Self-Change [14]Noy, C.Annals of Tourism Research42523.61
3.Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity [30]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research17319.22
4.The transformative power of the international sojourn: an ethnographic study of the international student experience [16]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research14110.84
5.Tourism and spirituality: A Phenomenological analysis [77]Willson, G. B.; McIntosh, A. J.,Zahra A.LAnnals of Tourism Research11913.22
GSTitleAuthorsJournalTCC/Y
1.Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research [203]Sigala, M.Journal of Business Research1061530.5
2.This trip really changed me: Backpackers’ Narratives of Self-Change [14]Noy, C.Annals of Tourism Research91350.72
3.The transformative power of the international sojourn: an ethnographic study of the international student experience [16]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research41732.07
4.Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity [30]Brown, L.Annals of Tourism Research33337
5.Wellness tourists: in search of transformation [24]Voigt, C.; Brown, G.; Howat, G.Tourism Review32129.18
Abbreviations: TC = Total number of citations; C/Y = Citations per year; WOS = Web of Science; SD = Science Direct; GS = Google Scholar.
Table 4. Most influential authors on TT.
Table 4. Most influential authors on TT.
AuthorsCountryUniversityTPTCWOSEBSCOSDGS
Lehto, X. Y.United StatesPurdue University58162447929464
Laing, J. H.AustraliaLa Trobe University44141144453203
Del Chiappa, G.Italy, South AfricaUniversity of Sassari;
University of Johannesburg
5388110444230
McGehee, N.United StatesVirginia Tech University427769630172
Sigala, M.AustraliaUniversity of South Australia3232248505581279
Brown, L.United KingdomBournemouth University314193330324762
Kirillova, K.Hong KongHong Kong Polytechnic University4652198760378
Cai, L.United StatesPurdue University3652198760378
Morgan, N.United KingdomSurrey University364414645131322
Filep, S.New ZealandUniversity of Otago334999490201
Pung, J. M.ItalyUniversity of Cagliari323164444119
Soulard, J.United StatesVirginia Tech University31493063083
Abbreviations: TP = Total number of publications regarding transformative tourism; TC = Total number of citations to the author’s publications regarding transformative tourism.
Table 5. Co-authorship in transformative tourism literature.
Table 5. Co-authorship in transformative tourism literature.
Co-AuthorArticlesCountriesUniversities and Institutions
Kirillova, K.; Lehto, X.Y.; Cai, L.3USA; Hong KongHong Kong Polytechnic University; Purdue University
Pung, J. M.; Del Chiappa, Giacomo3Italy; New Zealand;
South Africa
University of Cagliari; University of Otago; University of Sassari; University of Johannesburg
Soulard, J.; McGehee, N.; Stern, M. J./Soulard, J.; McGehee, N.2/1USAUniversity of Illinois; Virginia Tech University
Vidickienė, D.; Gedminaitė-Raudonė Ž.; Vilkė, R.2LithuaniaInstitute of Economics and Rural Development, Vilnius
Ryzdik, A.; Morgan, N.; Sedgley, D.2UKCardiff Metropolitan University
Neuhofer, B.; Celuch, K.2Austria; PolandFachhochschule Salzburg; Nicolaus Copernicus University
Godovykh, M.; Tasci, A. D. A.2USAUniversity of Central Florida
Laing, J. H.; Frost, W.2AustraliaLa Trobe University
Robledo, M. A.; Batle, J.2SpainUniversity of the Balearic Islands
McGehee N.; Knollenberg, W.2USAVirginia Tech University
Ivanovic, M.; Sandile L. M.2South AfricaUniversity of Johannesburg
Stone, G. A.; Duffy, L. N.2USAClemson University
Table 6. Most prolific journals and publishers.
Table 6. Most prolific journals and publishers.
Top JournalsQJhJIFJCITop PublishersArticles%TCTT h
Annals of Tourism ResearchQ118790112.85Taylor and Francis Ltd.2610.4582821
Tourism Management PerspectivesQ15465861.58Elsevier USA135.211769
Journal of Sustainable TourismQ111479681.51Taylor and Francis Ltd.114.412029
Tourism ManagementQ121610,9672.96Elsevier Ltd.93.67077
Tourism Recreation ResearchQ1/Q250-0.76Taylor and Francis Ltd.93.63495
SustainabilityQ1/Q210932510.56MDPI AG93.62904
Tourist StudiesQ15019040.55SAGE Publications Ltd.83.24938
Journal of Travel ResearchQ1145109822.99SAGE Publications Ltd.72.814087
Current Issues In TourismQ18274301.99Taylor and Francis Ltd.72.85987
Journal of Business ResearchQ121775501.87Elsevier Inc.72.822656
Journal of Travel & Tourism MarketingQ18275641.98Routledge72.82744
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementQ14559591.44Elsevier BV62.4854
Tourism GeographiesQ17366401.31Routledge523155
Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism EducationQ22917620.94Oxford Brookes University521534
Journal of Tourism FuturesQ221-0.88Emarald Group Publishing Ltd.52894
Journal of Tourism and Cultural ChangeQ23120410.62Taylor and Francis Ltd.41.61074
Journal of Destination Marketing & ManagementQ12769521.84Elsevier Ltd.41.6953
ReligionsQ150-1.65MDPI41.6372
Journal of Outdoor Recreation And TourismQ22728030.85Elsevier BV41.6192
International Journal of Religious Tourism & PilgrimageQ1/Q47--Technological University Dublin41.64-
Journal of EcotourismQ240--Taylor and Francis Ltd.31.22713
14 others-----2 (14)0.8 (14)--
65 others-----1 (65)0.4 (65)--
Total 101 Journals 25010020,129
Abbreviations: Q = quartile; Jh = Journal H-index; % = percentage of TT articles found in a journal out of total articles; TC = total citations regarding TT found in a journal; JIF = Journal Impact Factor; JCI = Journal Citation Indicator; TT h = H-index on TT literature.
Table 7. Annual number of articles published in top journals.
Table 7. Annual number of articles published in top journals.
TOP 20 JOURNALSANNUAL NUMBER OF PAPERS PUBLISHED IN TOP JOURNALS
200420092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022TOTAL
Annals of Tourism Research11 113 3 23153226
Tourism Management Perspectives 53 22113
Journal of Sustainable Tourism 1 12221 1111
Tourism Management 1 1 12 13 9
Tourism Recreation Research 3111219
Sustainability 1 11519
Tourist Studies 1 2 11 111 8
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 1 24 7
Journal of Business Research 3 1217
Journal of Travel Research 11 11111 7
Current Issues in Tourism 12111 7
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 11316
Tourism Geographies 4 15
Journal of Tourism Futures 4 1 5
Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 2 2 15
Religions 1 12 4
Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 1 1 114
International Journal of Religious Tourism & Pilgrimage 1 12 4
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 134
Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 3 1 4
Total111334876191815233014154
Table 8. Level of interdisciplinarity.
Table 8. Level of interdisciplinarity.
Journal Subject%Journal Categories%
Social Sciences36Geography, Planning and Development 14.1
Social and Political Science4.9
Cultural Studies4.3
Education3.3
Anthropology2.2
Transportation2.2
Development1.6
Communication1.1
Demography0.5
Gender Studies0.5
Health0.5
Linguistics and Language0.5
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)0.5
Urban Studies0.5
Business, Management and Accounting30.9Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management21.2
Strategy and Management2.7
Marketing2.2
Business and International Management0.5
Management of Technology and Innovation0.5
Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management0.5
Arts and Humanities8.8Literature and Literary Theory2.2
Philosophy1.6
Religious Studies1.6
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)1.1
History1.1
Visual Arts and Performing Arts1.1
Environmental Science8.1Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law3.3
Nature and Landscape Conservation2.7
Environmental Science (miscellaneous)1.6
Ecology1.1
Global and Planetary Change0.5
Health0.5
Pollution0.5
Toxicology and Mutagenesis0.5
Psychology5.9Social Psychology3.3
Applied Psychology1.1
Clinical Psychology1.1
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology0.5
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology0.5
Earth and Planetary Sciences3.7Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)1.1
Earth-Surface Processes0.5
Geology0.5
Space and Planetary Science0.5
Medicine2.9Environmental and Occupational Health0.5
Medicine (miscellaneous)0.5
Nuclear Medicine and Imagining0.5
Psychiatry and Mental Health0.5
Public Health0.5
Radiology0.5
Computer Science0.7Computer Science Applications 0.5
Information Systems0.5
Economics, Econometrics and Finances 0.7Economics and Econometrics0.5
Energy0.7Energy Engineering and Power Technology0.5
Energy, Sustainability and the Environment0.5
Engineering0.7Engineering (miscellaneous)0.5
Health Professions0.7Radiological and Ultrasound Technology0.5
Table 9. Top universities on TT.
Table 9. Top universities on TT.
Top UniversitiesArticlesRef. Times
Griffith University1015
University of Otago712
Bournemouth University710
Purdue University610
University of Johannesburg69
University of South Australia68
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University67
Southern Cross University67
University of Georgia57
Nottingham University56
University of Sassari55
Brigham Young University412
Virginia Tech University48
The University of Newcastle47
Arizona State University46
University of British Columbia45
La Trobe University45
Lisbon University Institute45
Leeds Beckett University44
Edith Cowan University44
Table 10. Funding rate on transformative tourism publications.
Table 10. Funding rate on transformative tourism publications.
FundedNot FundedTotal
Articles53197250
%21.2%78.8%100%
Table 11. Co-occurrences of words.
Table 11. Co-occurrences of words.
KeywordsTLSOccurrences
Travel857116
Outcome62469
Nature46960
Motivation55256
Dimension45553
Community43552
Journey33146
Student33745
Pilgrimage43138
Transformative experience27838
Benefit31536
Transformative learning30635
Authenticity28234
Engagement30233
Tourist experience26832
Abbreviations: TLS = Total Link Strength.
Table 12. Topic coverage in TT articles.
Table 12. Topic coverage in TT articles.
Articles%
Main theme12951.6
Secondary theme12148.4
Table 13. Research methods and perspectives on TT.
Table 13. Research methods and perspectives on TT.
ClassificationArticles%
Research methodsQualitative analysis20280.8
Quantitative analysis249.6
Mixed Methods249.6
Total250100
Research perspectiveTourists16566
General4417.6
Multiple/Holistic218.4
Stakeholders145.6
Hosts/Residents62.4
Total250100
Table 14. Types of tourism represented by TT.
Table 14. Types of tourism represented by TT.
Type of TourismArticles%
CulturalCultural-only (3); Indigenous tourism (5); Aboriginal tourism (1); Dark tourism (7); Temple stays (1); Rural (1); Festival and events (13)—sport events (2); Creative (2); Flamenco tourism (1); Film tourism (2); Food and wine tourism (1); Food-only tourism (1); Slum tourism (1).3915.6[217,218,219]; [63,103,137,167,220];
[19]; [17,36,115,135,152,175,221]; [222]; [223]; [40,41,100,102,108,110,119,127,154,164,185,224,225]; [68,226]; [227]; [150,151]; [124]; [228]; [31].
Nature-basedNature-based only (10); Cultural (1); Adventure-only (3); Eco-tourism (7) -
eco-tourism only (4), community based (2), marine (1); Community-based only (1); Frontier (1); Island (1); Conscious travel (1); Sustainable (2); Outdoor (1); Equestrian (1); Wellness and fitness (2), Extreme sports (2); Adventure sports (1); Mountaineering and cycling (1).
3514[46,48,58,93,123,171,229,230,231,232];
[233]; [89,182,234]; [186,235,236,237];
[26,94]; [59]; [170]; [105]; [149]; [82]; [238,239]; [92]; [109]; [96,161]; [18,163]; [13]; [53].
ReligiousReligious-only (3); Pilgrimage (12)—motorbiking (1); Spiritual (13) -Christian (1); Shamanic (1).2911.6[165,240,241]; [138,142,216,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250]; [57,77,116,144,176,251,252,253,254,255,256,257];
[258]; [140].
EducationalEducational-only (3); Study-abroad and international sojourn (18); Graduation travel (1).228.8[38,259,260]; [16,120,125,136,146,168,169,178,183,187,205,261,262,263,264,265,266,267];
[76].
VoluntourismVoluntourism-only (13); Farm tourism (1); Family tourism (1).156[10,86,112,118,121,154,184,207,268,269,270,271,272]; [85]; [273].
Wellness and wellbeingWellness-only (3); Wellbeing-only (2); Yoga tourism (3); Feng-shui tourism (1); Health tourism (2); Retreat centres (1); Lifestyle (1).135.2[24,81,274]; [188,275]; [91,276,277]; [97]; [98,278]; [32]; [279].
NicheFarm and WWOOF (2); Couchsurfing (1); Beer tourism (1); Antarctic tourism (3); Orphanage tourism (1); Space tourism (1); Paranormal tourism (1); RV tourism (1); Transnational tourism (1); Diaspora tourism (1); Feminist (1).145.6[166,280]; [34]; [45]; [106,281,282]; [181]; [283]; [284]; [157]; [75]; [285]; [286].
Other typesBusiness tourism (2); Mass tourism (1); Smart tourism (1); Experiential tourism (1); Solo travel (4); Backpacking (5) International (1); Social tourism (4).197.6[111,287]; [206]; [288]; [289]; [20,104,155,290]; [14,15,107,148,291]; [147]; [211,212,213,292].
General-6425.6[1,6,7,8,9,12,22,23,27,28,29,30,37,39,42,43,44,47,49,55,56,64,67,69,70,74,78,83,84,87,113,114,122,128,130,133,139,156,174,177,179,180,203,210,214,215,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309].
Total 250100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rus, K.A.; Dezsi, Ș.; Ciascai, O.R.; Pop, F. Calibrating Evolution of Transformative Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711027

AMA Style

Rus KA, Dezsi Ș, Ciascai OR, Pop F. Calibrating Evolution of Transformative Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2022; 14(17):11027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rus, Karina A., Ștefan Dezsi, Ovidiu R. Ciascai, and Florin Pop. 2022. "Calibrating Evolution of Transformative Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis" Sustainability 14, no. 17: 11027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop