1. Introduction
The continuous expansion of cities and the impact on the ecological environment has become an important element in the study of global environmental changes. Along with the significant spatial expansion of cities and the conversion of land types, the structure, function, and pattern of cities [
1,
2] change, which can lead to changes in the ecological environment. For example, some studies suggest that the expansion of cities leads to increased pollutant emissions and reduced ecosystem resilience [
3,
4], which are important factors leading to the poor ecological environment of cities in developing countries such as China, India, and Laos [
5,
6,
7]. It is estimated that China’s urbanization rate will reach 70% in 2035 and 80% in 2050 [
8]. By then, as urbanization continues, the impact of urban expansion on the ecological environment will continue, which is a more complex issue for most developing regions regarding how they should face this environmental degradation.
Research on the impact of urban spatial expansion on the ecological environment has received much attention. In previous studies, the evaluation was mainly based on unilateral index evaluation, such as the evaluation and analysis from the perspective of the landscape pattern index [
9], land use change [
10], and urban surface temperature [
11] with the help of 3S technology; however, in reality, the impact of urban expansion on the ecological environment is very complex and strongly variable, and is difficult to evaluate by individual indexes. The international community has some comprehensive ecological evaluation models for the ecological environment, such as the remote sensing-based ecological index (RSEI) [
12], eco-environmental effects of urban sprawl (EEUS) [
13], and other models. Based on remote sensing and spatial analysis techniques, ecological environment quality evaluation indexes are selected and a comprehensive evaluation method is used to quantitatively evaluate the impact of urban spatial expansion on regional ecological environment changes. Some scholars have also constructed models to evaluate the impact of urban spatial expansion on regional natural geographic and environmental elements and natural disasters and the analysis and evaluation of their resource and energy effects with the help of officially released socioeconomic statistics [
14,
15]. However, these methods also have certain limitations and cannot highlight the impact of urban spatial expansion on the dynamics of the ecological environment, and these methods also ignore the ecological indicators with large differences in values. The entropy-weighted comprehensive evaluation method is a more widely used comprehensive evaluation method [
16,
17], and is more objective compared to other comprehensive evaluation methods because it determines the indicator weights based on the changes in the indicators. In addition, current research still focuses on cities that are already relatively developed, while less research has been conducted on rapidly expanding cities. If such urban expansion and environmental changes are evaluated and defined, it can help fast-growing cities such as Hefei, in China and Pushkar in India protect the local environment in their future development, constituting a reference value for future urban planning.
Therefore, taking as an example the Hefei municipal area in China, which has been rapidly urbanized in recent years, and combining eight remote sensing images from 1984 to 2020 and social development data from government statistics, the entropy weight method was used to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system, with ecological land, ecosystem service value, ecological environment quality, urban land expansion coefficient, urban heat island rate index, total pollutant emissions, ecological pressure, and ecological deficit as evaluation indexes. The analysis was conducted to ensure that the possible impacts of urban expansion on the urban environment of Hefei can be comprehensively analyzed in terms of resources, environment, ecosystem service capacity, ecological security, and other aspects. This study provides new evidence for the ecological and environmental changes caused by urban expansion, and provides a theoretical reference for ecological environment protection in developing countries such as China.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
As of 2020, Hefei has a total area of 11,445.1 km
2 and a built-up area of 528.5 km
2. Its total population is 8.189 million, and its urbanization rate is as high as 76.33% [
18]. Hefei is located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China and belongs to the Jianghuai region, located northwest of Chaohu Lake, as shown in
Figure 1. The Feixi River is around the center of the city, and the land has a subtropical humid monsoon climate [
19]. Its economic development, political status, and education popularization occupy a leading position in Anhui Province, China. Hefei is also the main transportation and communication hub in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. With the growing demand for the economic development of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and Anhui Province in China in recent years, the urban space of Hefei keeps expanding, leading to some major changes in the urban land structure and certain impacts on the environment. Hefei is a relatively developed city in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and it is also a sub-central city in the region [
20], with an important position in the ecological aspect. Hence, the environmental situation of Hefei has an important impact on the environment of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and even China as a whole. The study of urban expansion and its ecological and environmental benefits is of great significance to regulate the blind expansion of urban construction land and safeguard the regional environment.
2.2. Data Source and Landscape Information Extraction
This study is based on the fall data of remote sensing images of the Landsat series, including the following years: 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014, and 2020. The remote sensing image data of the first six periods were recorded by Landsat 5, and 2014 and 2020 were recorded by Landsat 8, with resolutions of 30 and 15 m, respectively, meeting the research requirements. The analysis was also conducted with the help of relevant socioeconomic statistics and aided by software such as ArcGIS and ENVI.
According to the current land use classification system [
21], the surface landscape types were classified into five categories—construction land, forest land, water area, cultivated land, grassland, and unused land—by combining the actual situation of regional land use and remote sensing image maps. The supervised classification results are shown in
Figure 2. Several local high-definition image maps were selected for sampling and verification, and the kappa coefficient and image classification accuracy of the land use classification maps were >80% and 90%, respectively, meeting the classification accuracy requirements of this study.
2.3. Comprehensive Evaluation Method Based on Entropy Weight Method
The entropy method is determined according to the degree of variation of the index value, which is an objective empowerment method and avoids the bias caused by human factors [
22]. The numerical gap between the various indicators in this study is large, so the entropy weight method was used.
Through the entropy weight method, we selected appropriate indicators and constructed an evaluation index system to comprehensively evaluate the urban ecological benefits of Hefei. The positive indicators of ecological benefits are ecological land area (ELA), ecosystem service value (ESV), and eco-environmental index (EI). The negative indicators include urban land expansion coefficient (K), urban heat island ratio index (URI), total pollutant emission (PE), ecological pressure (EP), and ecological deficit (ED), as shown in
Figure 3.
The extreme value method was used to conduct dimensionless treatment of the data, and then the weight of each index was obtained through the entropy weight method. Finally, the contribution degree of each index was multiplied by the weight and summed to obtain the comprehensive score. The calculation formula is as follows:
where P
ij is the contribution degree, X
ij is the dimensionless processed data, i is the year, and j is the index [
23].
- (2)
Information entropy of the system
where ej is the information entropy of the system.
- (3)
Weight of each index
where wj is weight value of index.
- (4)
Comprehensive score of the eco-environment.
where S is the comprehensive score. According to Equations (1)–(3), the weight vector of m targets can be obtained. The weight values and proportion values of each index are shown in
Table 1.
2.4. Calculation Method of the Positive Indicators
2.4.1. Ecosystem Service Value
Based on the equivalent coefficient table for ESV per unit area of terrestrial ecosystem in China [
24,
25], combined with the economic value of natural food production of farmland in Hefei, the ecosystem service value coefficients of each landscape type in Hefei were estimated: forest land 851,668/km
2, grassland 282,011/km
2, arable land 269,157/km
2, water area 1,790,617/km
2, and unused land 16,359/km
2. Due to the special nature of construction land, its ecosystem service value is not estimated for the time being. The specific ecosystem service value coefficients are shown in
Table 2.
The value of ecosystem services is calculated as follows:
where ESV is the ecosystem service value; i and n are the landscape type and quantity in the region, respectively; Di is the ecosystem value coefficient of the ith landscape type; and S
i is the area occupied by the ith landscape type [
26,
27,
28].
2.4.2. Eco-Environmental Index
The eco-environmental index model is a standardized model proposed by the Chinese Environmental Protection Department to evaluate the ecological environmental status in China. According to the eco-environmental index model, the ecological environmental quality of Hefei is evaluated based on the ecological environmental status of the region [
29]. The calculation formula is as follows:
EI is the eco-environmental index, BI is the biological abundance index, VI is the vegetation cover index, WI is the water density index, PI is the environmental quality index, LI is the land degradation index, S refers to an area, EM refers to emission, and P refers to annual precipitation.
Aero is the normalization coefficient of the land degradation index, and the degree of soil erosion [
30] can be determined according to the soil erosion index table of the Ministry of Water Resources, that is, by overlaying the vegetation coverage map and slope map. According to the current situation of the study area, the fractional vegetation cover percentages are >75, 60–75, 45–60, 30–45, and <30, which are rated as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The areas with slopes <5°, 5–8°, 8–15°, 15–25°, and >25° are graded as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Then, the two maps after grading are added, and the obtained value is the basic data of soil erosion degree grading. The values of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are classified as mild erosion; 7 and 8 are classified as moderate erosion; 9 and 10 are classified as heavy erosion. The soil erosion indicators are shown in
Table 3.
According to the
Technical Specification for Eco-environmental Quality Assessment [
31], the index is divided into the following five grades, as shown in
Table 4.
2.4.3. Urban Land Expansion Coefficient
The urban land expansion coefficient can be used to determine whether the expansion speed of the construction land within the city is reasonable.
K is the expansion coefficient of urban land, V is the urban expansion rate, and UPR is the average annual growth rate of the urban population. When the value of K is closer to 1.12, the urban land scale expansion tends to be more reasonable; when the value of K is greater than 1.12, the expansion is too fast; and when the value of K is <1.12, the expansion is too slow [
32].
2.4.4. Urban Heat Island Ratio Index
The urban heat island ratio index shows the areas of the city that are affected by the heat island effect, which are significantly warmer than the rest of the region and seriously affect the quality of the ecological environment. The steps of urban surface temperature inversion are as follows.
With the help of thermal infrared band data in remote sensing images, the single window algorithm with high accuracy is used in the research [
33,
34]. At the same time, for Landsat TM and OLI remote sensing image data, the inversion formulas are different:
For different types of image data, K1 and K2 values also vary (please refer to the data header file). B (TS) is the thermal infrared radiation brightness value, and a and b values are constants. For the specific case of the Hefei municipal area, a = −67.35535, b = 0.458606 [
35], T6 is the satellite brightness temperature of TM6, Ta is the average atmospheric action temperature in the local actual situation, and C and D are the intermediate variables, calculated as follows.
where b1 is the thermal infrared radiation calibration value,
is the surface-specific radiation rate [
36], lu is the radiant intensity of the upward atmosphere, τ is the atmospheric transmission, and ld is the radiant intensity of the downward atmosphere (data source:
http://atmcorr.gsfc.nasa.gov/, accessed on 12 March 2021).
is closely related to the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which is the normalized vegetation index.
Surface emissivity on the natural surfaces is calculated as follows:
Surface emissivity on the town surface is calculated as follows:
The FVC indicates the fractional vegetation cover [
37]. NDVIv represents the NDVI value when the site is completely covered by vegetation, whereas NDVI
S represents the NDVI value when the site is bare. These two values need to be determined according to the actual situation of different years.
where URI is the urban heat island ratio index [
38]; m is the normalized grade index, the equal series of temperature classification; i and n are the target temperature grade and grades within the urban heat island, respectively;
is the weight value, taking the grade i value; and
is the percentage of grade i area.
2.4.5. Ecological Deficit and Ecological Pressure
Ecological deficit and ecological pressure can satisfactorily show the impact of human activity on the ecological environment in cities. The formulas are as follows:
where EF is the per-capita ecological footprint, j is an ecologically productive land type, i is the type of goods and inputs consumed,
is the equilibrium factor,
are the per-capita consumption of the ith consumer goods and its global average productivity, EC is the per-capita ecological carrying capacity, a
j is the per-capita ecological productive land area, y
j is the yield factor, the values of
and
refer to previous research results, ed is ecological deficit or profit, ED stands for the total ecological deficit, and EP is the ecological pressure [
39,
40].
ED is an important indicator to measure the level of the ecological carrying capacity of a region [
35]. If ED > 0, it is an ecological deficit, indicating that the ecological trace of the region exceeds its ecological carrying capacity and the regional ecosystem is unsafe. If ED < 0, it is ecological profit and loss, which indicates that the ecological carrying capacity of the region exceeds the ecological footprint, and the regional ecosystem is relatively safe.
EP is an important index to observe regional ecological risk, which can quantitatively reveal the differences in regional ecological risk in time and space. The ecological risk is divided into the following five levels according to the range of T value: if the value is >1, the ecological risk is extremely high; 0.8–1.0, high risk; 0.6–0.8, medium risk; 0.4–0.6, low risk; <0.4, extremely low risk [
41,
42].
4. Discussion
4.1. Selection of Evaluation Index
In the study of urban expansion, many scholars are studying the structure of cities, such as Yu et al. (2022), who proposed a framework of an assessment process of polycentric structure based on spatial distribution and interaction [
45], but did not propose how the development and change in urban structure caused changes in the local ecological environment. Camille et al. (2020) started to study the changes in the ecological environment with the change in urban structure [
46], and found that the type of urban structure influences the environmental conditions of cities, especially the irrational expansion of cities, which may seriously lead to the deterioration of the urban ecological environment [
47,
48].
Therefore, we explored the changes in the ecological environment from the perspective of urban surface land-use type. To avoid the singularity of the experiment, the selection of indicators takes into account many aspects related to the urban environment, such as urban pollutant emissions, population, resource output, and urban surface temperature. In the study of positive indicators, not only land-use changes are taken into account, but also pollutant emissions, regional slope, regional consumption capacity, population, etc. For example, the urban expansion coefficient was chosen to determine the urban expansion by combining urban population and urban construction land, and the ecosystem service value coefficient was calculated by using the 2020 food prices and land types. The constructed evaluation system provides a reference basis for macroeconomic control of the urban environment and urban planning and makes the evaluation results more comprehensive and fairer.
4.2. Impact of Urban Expansion on the Ecological Environment
The study of the impact of urban expansion on the ecological environment highlights the impact of human development on the ecological environment. The continuous expansion of cities leads to the deteriorating condition of the urban environment year by year. During the study period, 592 km
2 of ecological land was converted into construction land, the total value of regional ecosystem services decreased from USD 487.75 million to 309.42 million, and the eco-environmental index also kept decreasing, which shows that the situation of construction land encroaching on ecological land is critical, especially the decrease in grassland and arable land with high ecological functions [
49], which make up the regional biodiversity. This is similar to the findings of Yang and Rotich et al., that urban expansion leads to a reduction in biodiversity and vegetation cover in the region, ultimately leading to a reduction in the supply of urban ecosystem services and a deterioration in the quality of the ecological environment [
50].
At the same time, the increase in population, the decrease in ecological land, and the acceleration of urbanization have led to a 6.64-fold increase in total urban pollutant emissions, a 10-fold increase in the heat island ratio index, and an increase in ecological pressure and ecological deficit per capita to 35.685 and 2.444, respectively, in Hefei. The industrial wastewater, urban domestic sewage, industrial waste gas, and industrial solid waste emissions in the city increased 0.1, 1.77, 4, and 8 times their initial values, respectively, showing a positive correlation with the expansion of the construction land area, indicating that the expansion of the city and the increase in industrial land led to the intensification of environmental pollution. The comparison of the spatial distribution of surface temperature and the landscape classification map revealed the spread of construction land and the high-temperature zone. The spread shows a high similarity. The area of the construction site is too large for fertilization, and Dimitra, Mizbah, and other scholars mentioned that the main constituents in the construction land, such as concrete, asphalt, and other impermeable materials, absorb heat quickly and have a small specific heat capacity, and warm up faster than the natural sub-base [
51,
52]. Moreover, the green space system within the urban area is underdeveloped, and the distribution of green space is scattered within the jurisdiction of Hefei and cannot be systematically linked, making it difficult to mitigate the urban heat island effect. At the same time, the increasing ecological pressure and ecological deficit indicate that with the economic development and urbanization process, the human impact on the ecological environment is expanding, and the ecological carrying capacity is broken but decreasing. This results in the difficulty in regulating the impact caused by humans on the environment, giving rise to ecological security problems, excessive ecological pressure, and extremely high and rising ecological risk.
4.3. Importance of Hefei’s Development
The city of Hefei has urbanized at a fast pace and has been able to continuously absorb the population of the surrounding areas, making the urban population grow significantly, which has now exceeded 70% [
53], as shown in
Figure 8. This is still far from developed cities. Using the data of developed countries instead of the standard of developed cities, as of 2020, the data of GDP per capita, urbanization rate, and Engel coefficient of developed countries are >USD 46,350, >80%, and <30%, respectively, while those of Hefei are USD 18,784, 76.33%, and 33.8%.
The rapid urbanization of Hefei is related to its special position, as Hefei is located in the middle of China. The rise of central China is crucial to China, and Anhui Province needs a city as its representative, so the development of Hefei is fundamental to China’s development. For a provincial capital in an area such as Anhui Province, which does not have too many characteristics, the only way to create a “star city” is to implement a strong provincial capital strategy. This is the right choice for the capital of Anhui Province. Only through the implementation of the strategy of strengthening the provincial capital and creating a star city can the development of the prefecture-level cities in Anhui Province be stimulated. By studying the ecological impact of Hefei’s urban expansion and how to preserve the environment in the process of urbanization, we can guide other areas in the Yangtze River Delta region and even the rapidly expanding cities in the world [
54].
4.4. Limiting Factors
This study has some limitations. Firstly, we examined a long period of time, and we can clearly see the evolution of urbanized Hefei, but this also leads to the low resolution of the obtained Landsat series remote sensing images, which has some influence on the land classification and surface temperature inversion. The second limitation is that some indicators that can adequately evaluate the state of the urban ecological environment are not available or cannot be described quantitatively due to some missing data, such as the carbon sequestration and humidification capacity of vegetation in the whole city, thus leading to some limitations of the study. Finally, this study only considered the rate of urban expansion, while the urban structure in the process of urban expansion was not included in the evaluation system because it could not be quantitatively described. However, the impact of urban structure on the ecological environment is not small, and it can be realized by regulating the distribution and size of various types of land. Future research would benefit from a comprehensive evaluation of the ecological environment of Hefei, China, for more in-depth studies, including the use of higher-resolution remote sensing imagery, and the use of more accessible indicators. We hope that in the future, there will be ways to quantify the urban structure and use it in research.
5. Conclusions and Outlook
In this study, we constructed an evaluation index system from ecological land area, ecosystem service value, eco-environmental index, urban land expansion coefficient, urban heat island proportion index, total pollutant emissions, ecological pressure, and ecological deficit and comprehensively evaluated the impact of urbanization expansion on the ecological environment with the help of the entropy weight method. The results show that the ecological land area in the positive indicators decreases from 1194 to 602 km2, the value of ecosystem services decreases from USD 487.75 million to 309.42 million, and the eco-environmental index decreases by 0.03. In the negative indicators, the urban expansion coefficient increases to nearly 10 times its initial value. The heat island ratio index also increases from 0.03 to 0.32, the pollutant emission increases by 6.64 times its initial value, and the ecological pressure and ecological deficit increase to 3.1 and 3.85 times their initial values, respectively. The decrease in positive indicators and the increase in negative indicators in the evaluation system finally lead to the decrease in the overall ecological environmental score of Hefei from 0.397 to 0.008.
As a subcenter city of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China, Hefei city has been developing rapidly in recent years. This study can provide a quantitative basis for optimizing the existing urban construction pattern and future sustainable development construction, improving the ecological environment of urban green space, and effectively improving the quality of people’s living environment.