Abstract
The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind seeks to mitigate the world’s current challenges, and to create a more sustainable future through better global governance. Some of the philosophical arguments of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, and its foundations, which this article traces, are grounded in the philosophical teachings of Confucius and Mencius. The five pillars of Confucianism are benevolence (Ren), righteousness (Yi), propriety (Li), wisdom (Zhi) and fidelity (Xin). The five pillars have their equivalents in the philosophy of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind: benevolence has its equivalents in multilateral and bilateral agreements; righteousness shows justice; propriety’s equivalents are international standards and regulations; wisdom is the problem-solving dialogues; and trustworthiness is equated to international organizations that safeguard global integrity. The Confucian principle of harmony is congruent with the objective of the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, of creating a world of harmony, peace and cooperation. The Golden Rule has been observed in the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind, through its insistence on reciprocal bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Mencius’ philosophical contribution to the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind is in his theory of human nature, where humaneness is seen as developmental—as would be the community built by the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind. Mencius’ principle of governance is congruent with the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind’s insistence on responsible governance. These congruences and similarities, between the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind and the philosophies of Confucius and Mencius, point to the foundations for the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind.
1. Introduction
Today’s world is facing escalating challenges, which contemporary forms of global governance are struggling to address. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept is worth considering in this scenario, as it can be taken, not only as a tool for diplomacy, but also as a deep philosophical notion which has a timeless impact. On the one hand, it carefully considers all the challenging questions being faced by the modern community; on the other hand, it also proposes a deliberate answer to these challenges. It is worth considering ideas, for instance, such as the concepts of harmony in diversity, sharing of prosperity, the universality of human need and destiny, benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and fidelity. These can be applied to solving the problems faced by the globalized world. To put it concisely, the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept should prove to be a positive contribution to creating a more sustainable future through better governance, as it holds future promise.
Confucianism is one of the earliest philosophical schools of thought to have originated in China, dating back to the Zhou dynasty. The father of this school of thought is Confucius, and it is from his concepts that Mencius, his student, built his philosophy. Confucianism is the leading moral philosophy of China and other eastern countries, such as Japan, Vietnam and Korea. Confucian ethics posit the framework for engagement between individuals and their society, and the world they live in. Apart from being a moral philosophy, it is also a political ideology, a school of thought, and a way of life.
Five virtues are associated with Confucianism: the first is benevolence (Ren); the second is righteousness (Yi); the third is propriety (Li); the fourth is wisdom (Zhi); and the fifth is fidelity (Xin). Derivatives of these virtues place character at the center of the way of life. According to Chang [1] any individual who was to be a leader in Ancient Chinese society was expected to exhibit the above five traits. Governing officials were expected to lead by example, and it was believed that the virtuosity of leaders would enable their subjects to be virtuous as well. Governing officials were held to a higher moral standard than the average citizens, acting as if they were ministers or parents over their subjects. At one point, Confucius told Tsze-kung, one of his students that “the requisites of government are that there be sufficiency of food, the sufficiency of military equipment, and the confidence of people in their ruler” [1].
4. Conclusions
Confucius and Mencius are two of the most influential philosophers in Chinese history. The five major tenets of Confucius—which are benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and fidelity—have a close association with the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept is associated with benevolence; it advocates multilateral arrangements that insist on reciprocal actions between nations. The association between the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept and righteousness is that they both advocate justice in the dispensation of governance. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept is congruent with propriety in its insistence that nations should do what is the right thing to do. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept intersects with wisdom in its advocating dialogue and research to gain the relevant knowledge for solving problems. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept aims to develop harmony through multilateral and bilateral social contracts between nations, and to advance the Golden Rule through ensuring the accountability of nations. Mencius’ humane principles are applied by the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept, in that it advocates for the first world nations to help the developing nations. The Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept advocates continuous dialogue, just as Mencius’ tenet of righteousness advocates continuous knowledge acquisition. In addition, Mencius’ governance principle is congruent with the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept’s insistence on responsible governance. Owing to the similarities, and the congruence between the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept and the principles of both Confucius and Mencius, it can be seen that the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind concept is an adaptation of both philosophical teachings.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, U.K., H.W. and Z.C.; methodology, U.K., H.W. and Z.C.; validation, U.K., H.W., Z.C., A.B., A.M. and H.H.; formal analysis, U.K., H.W., A.B., A.M. and H.H.; investigation, U.K., H.W. and A.B.; resources, H.W.; data curation, U.K., Z.C., A.B., A.M. and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, U.K. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, Z.C., A.B., A.M. and H.H.; visualization, H.W., A.M. and H.H.; supervision, H.W.; project administration, H.W., A.M. and H.H.; funding acquisition, A.M. and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Dalian University of Technology for providing a research facility.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chang, W.; Nathan, M. Inside Chinas Legal System; Chandos Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Xi, J. Working Together to Forge a New Partnership of Win-win Cooperation and Create a Community of a Shared Future for Mankind. English Version. 2015. Available online: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/topics_665678/xjpdmgjxgsfwbcxlhgcl70znxlfh/t1305051.shtml (accessed on 20 January 2022).
- Chen, L. The basic character of the virtue theory of Mencius philosophy and its significance in classical Confucianism. Front. Philos. China 2013, 8, 4–21. [Google Scholar]
- Confucius. The Analects of Confucius in Plain and Simple English: BookCaps Study Guide; BookCaps Study Guides; Golgotha Press: Anaheim, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Legge, J., Translator; The Works of Mencius; Dover Books: New York, NY, USA, 1970.
- Legge, J. The Chinese Classics: Vol. 1: Confucian Analects, the Great Learning, and the Doctrine of the Mean; Trübner & Co.: London, UK, 1861. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q. Humanity or benevolence? The interpretation of Confucian Ren and its modern implications. In Human Dignity in Classical Chinese Philosophy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 45–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gier, N.F. Confucius, Gandhi and the aesthetics of virtue. Asian Philos. 2001, 11, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, H.; Zhang, Y. Global governance: The connotation of a community with a shared future for mankind in Belt and Road architecture. In The Theoretical System of Belt and Road Initiative; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, R. Literature review on Community of a Shared Future for mankind thought. Party Gov. Forum 2018, 399, 56. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q.; Cui, T. The Values of Confucian Benevolence and the Universality of the Confucian Way of Extending Love. Front. Philos. China 2012, 7, 20–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, P.R.; Lamond, D.A. What would Confucius do?—Confucian ethics and self-regulation in management. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q. Zhongguo Ruxue Zhi Jingshen [The Spirit of Chinese: Confucian Benevolence and Confucian Way of Extending Love]; Fudan University Press: Shanghai, China, 2009. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Akbaruddin, S. Beijing Likes to Talk about “Community of Shared Future of Mankind”. What Exactly Does It Mean? 2020. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/beijing-likes-to-talk-about-community-of-shared-future-of-mankind-what-exactly-does-it-mean (accessed on 17 November 2021).
- Henderson, J.B. The original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and his successors; A new translation and commentary by E. Bruce Brooks and A. Taeko Brooks. By E. Bruce Brooks and A. Taeko Brooks. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. X, 342 pp. J. Asian Stud. 1999, 58, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, K. The deep structure of Confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asian Philos. 2001, 11, 179–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levinas, E. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Pilon, A. Values and the Public Arena: An Ecosystem Approach for the Environment, Education and Public Policies. 2021. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/47072089/Values_and_the_Public_Arena_an_Ecosystem_Approach_for_the_Environment_Education_and_Public_Policies (accessed on 23 July 2022).
- Darvay, D. Emmanuel Levinas: Ethics, Justice, and the Human Beyond Being. Genre 2004, 37, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X. Joy, wisdom and virtue—The Confucian paradigm of good life. J. Chin. Philos. 2018, 45, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, C.C. The Analects of Confucius; Version 2.2; Eno, R., Translator; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2015; Chapter XII. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, C.C. The Analects; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 45–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nathan, A.J.; Zhang, B. ‘A shared future for mankind’: Rhetoric and reality in Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. J. Contemp. China 2021, 31, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majlis Agama Khonghucu, S.J.; Drijarkara, N.; Aiken, H.D. Si Shu (Kitab Yang Empat), Kitab Suci Agama Khonghucu, Majelis Tinggi Agama Khonghucu; Matakin: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Rekowski, C. Harmony and Diversity: Confucian and Daoist Discourses on Learning in Ancient China. Undergrad. Rev. 2007, 3, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, X. An Introduction to Confucianism; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Dafei, G. Confucius Humanitarinist Ideas and the Contemporary International Community, in Confucianism and The Modernization of China; Krieger, S., Trauzettel, R., Eds.; v. Hase & Koehler Verlang: Mainz, Germany, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Ricoeur, P. Memory, History, Forgetting; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-226-71342-7. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X. In pursuit of a Community of a Shared Future: China’s global activism in perspective. China Q. Int. Strateg. Stud. 2018, 4, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berthel, K. Creating Harmony from Diversity: What Confucianism Reveals about the True Value of Liberal Education for the 21st Century. ASIA Netw. Exch. J. Asian Stud. Lib. Arts 2017, 24, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrell, P.L. Investing in staff for student retention. In The NEA 2009 Almanac of Higher Education; National Education Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
- Mullis, E. Ritualized exchange: A consideration of Confucian reciprocity. Asian Philos. 2008, 18, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C. The Confucian conception of freedom. Philos. East West 2014, 64, 902–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C. The philosophy of harmony in classical Confucianism. Philos. Compass 2008, 3, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bary, T.; Bloom, I. Sources of Chinese Tradition, 2nd ed.; Columbia University Press/Asia for Educators: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Volume 1, p. 129. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G.; Niu, X. Community of a Shared Future for mankind thoughts’ inheritance and development based on Marxism world history theory. J. Fujian Party Sch. 2019, 4, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, C. Mencius’ extension of moral feelings: Implications for cosmopolitan education. Ethics Educ. 2018, 14, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, F.; Su, J. Shaping “A Community of a Shared Future for mankind”: New elements of General Assembly resolution 72/250 on further practical measures for the PAROS. Space Policy 2018, 44–45, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, V.N. Mencius (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). 2020. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mencius/ (accessed on 21 November 2021).
- White Paper. The 2011 White Paper on China’s Peaceful Development. Available online: http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2014/09/09/content_281474986284646.htm (accessed on 1 January 2022).
- Bai, T. A Mencian version of limited democracy. Res. Publica 2008, 14, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geoffrey, X. Human Nature—Good or Evil? An Evaluation of the Debate in Early Chinese Philosophy. 2019. Available online: https://afribary.com/works/human-nature-good-or-evil-an-evaluation-of-the-debate-in-early-chinese-philosophy (accessed on 20 June 2022).
- Norden, V.; Bryan, W. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Ames, T. The Mencian conception of Ren Xing: Does it mean ‘human nature’? In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham; Open Court: La Salle, IL, USA, 1991; pp. 143–175. [Google Scholar]
- Dy, M.B. Rethinking Mencius on the ethics of governance. Eco-ethica 2015, 4, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mencius. The Chinese Classics. 1861; p. 269. Available online: https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=HgJEwAEACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 25 November 2021).
- Horowitz, C.A. Paris Agreement. Int. Leg. Mater. 2016, 55, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).