1. Introduction
Well-being is traditionally considered from psychological and social perspectives. It is focused on how people individually confront difficulties and challenges and contribute to social purposes [
1,
2]. Well-being is specifically relevant in education since it affects the quality of educators’ personal and professional lives. Recently, Hascher and Waber [
3] considered teacher well-being a complex matter that involves cognitive, affective, social, and psychological areas. To invest in quality professional careers for future teachers, it is suggested to investigate preservice teachers’ (PSTs) well-being [
4]. Likewise, to explore PSTs’ well-being, it is essential to consider contextual factors due to their influence on schools. These spaces are particularly relevant in the study of well-being as they allow PSTs to question their knowledge, attitudes, values, and competencies [
5]. Although well-being involves several dimensions, this study will be framed by psychological or personal and social factors that present strong interconnections in their impact on professional well-being [
6]. Psychological elements, such as perceived self-efficacy or job satisfaction, strongly influence the experience of teaching when it is needed to self-evaluate and fulfill purposes. Likewise, in the social dimension, we will consider interactions with agents, such as cooperating teachers (CTs), university supervisors (USs), children, etc., who affect both their self-perceptions and satisfaction with training spaces.
The classroom environment becomes an opportunity for PSTs to understand issues related to the teaching profession, such as stress, emotional arousal, commitment, or burnout. Perceived self-efficacy is one determinant variable in studying PSTs’ well-being and its relationship with these issues [
7,
8]. The socio-cognitive theory [
9] defines perceived self-efficacy as the explanation of one’s self-perceptions about one’s competence: “perceived self-efficacy is a group of beliefs in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (p. 3). Perceived self-efficacy influences other variables involved in professional activity; for instance, Tschannen-Moran et al. [
10,
11] claimed that self-perceptions make teachers evaluate their abilities, knowledge, and attitudes toward teaching. Subsequent studies [
12,
13,
14,
15] explain the potential effect of perceived self-efficacy on satisfaction with one’s actions; simultaneously, high job satisfaction along with several other factors also influences perceived self-efficacy. Thus, these two variables present an interconnection that affects self-regulation in learning processes and plays an essential role in the study of PSTs’ well-being [
6,
16,
17,
18].
Perceived self-efficacy has been widely used in teacher professional development research [
19,
20]. This internal variable impacts teachers’ willingness to deal with teaching opportunities and challenges throughout their careers. It directly relates to teachers’ well-being since perceived self-efficacy affects how they feel in the workplace from psychological, social, and cognitive perspectives [
9,
21]. However, self-efficacy does not emerge when teachers enter the teaching profession; it arises during initial teacher education since future teachers experience specific self-perceptions of professional worth during this period when intervening and performing in educational settings [
22]. Hence, the role of perceived self-efficacy in initial teacher education seems to need an extensive discussion to focus on caring for this self-perception at the right time, thus preventing future psychological and professional mismatches [
23,
24].
PSTs are university students whose studies are related to education (i.e., bachelor’s degree in primary education, early childhood education, etc.)-educated and they present specific perceived self-efficacy related to their professional identity, teacher competencies, social relationships, etc. PSTs’ perceived self-efficacy can be addressed as an element that affects professional development possibilities, understood as a continuous learning process in experiential settings [
25,
26]. Therefore, the perceived self-efficacy of PSTs need to be considered as a modulator for Initial Teacher Professional Development (ITPD) [
27].
Considering the interactive and experiential character of ITPD, practicum experiences offer a wide area to explore predictors of perceived self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Satisfaction regards not only the professional action itself but also the environment in which the satisfaction arises and is framed [
28]. In the practicum, perceived self-efficacy and job satisfaction can be investigated more easily than in the university classroom space due to several reasons: firstly, the student teaching experience is practical because it presents opportunities to act as professionals and interact with other educational agents [
20,
29]; secondly, it is an accurate and reliable workplace for PSTs since it represents what they will find when finishing their initial teacher training [
30,
31]; finally, it allows us to study ITPD opportunities indirectly. Therefore, improvements in the PSTs’ well-being during this initial stage can be considered [
32,
33].
For all these reasons, this study aims to explore the perceived self-efficacy of PSTs toward their professional competencies during their practicum. It helps understand what implications these contexts create for PSTs’ well-being, for instance, exploring the impact of perceived self-efficacy on PSTs’ satisfaction with their performance and with their environment. Thus, it also allows understanding of how perceived self-efficacy is conditioned by satisfaction with the school climate and the classroom context. Hence, our research addresses teachers’ well-being through initial teacher education to contribute to a more sustainable teaching career. Our contribution consists of providing insights about the study’s issue in order to reduce future investments in helping teachers in service to maintain their self-perceptions and satisfaction stable.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Objectives
On the one hand, this study explores the perceived self-efficacy of PSTs of their professional competencies during field experiences. On the other hand, the study also searches for significant relationships between perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction with one’s competence development and within the practicum setting. In this vein, it is examined how predictors of perceived self-efficacy and job satisfaction can impact the well-being involved in the ITPD.
The specific quantitative objectives are as follows:
To investigate whether significant differences exist in the PSTs’ perceived self-efficacy after the practicum.
To explore the relationship between the perceived self-efficacy of PSTs, their satisfaction with their competence development, and the contextual factors of the practicum.
The specific qualitative objectives are as follows:
To explore sources of perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction within practicum contexts from the PSTs’ viewpoints.
To analyze sources of perceived self-efficacy as modulators of well-being from the PSTs’ perspectives.
To investigate the satisfaction associated with the improvement of perceived self-efficacy from the participants’ points of view.
3.2. Research Design
This research employed a mixed methodological design. Following research guidelines about professional well-being [
6], this study combined a quantitative approach, conducted using a quasi-experimental, pre-test–post-test design, with a qualitative approach, conducted through two focus group sessions. Mixed methods research was selected due to its flexibility and depth, in which statistics and interpretation are combined to study self-efficacy perceptions [
62,
63,
64]. Without a qualitative overview, quantitative information cannot obtain an in-depth view of perceived self-efficacy. The focus groups allow us obtain information on the PSTs’ interactions and deepen their meaning-making of well-being during the practicum [
65,
66].
The quantitative approach involved designing and validating three specific Likert-type self-report scales regarding PSTs’ perceived self-efficacy. Owing to the specificity of the topic and variables to explore, it was necessary to design our instrument. Data about perceived self-efficacy were collected before and after student teaching experiences; data on the PSTs’ satisfaction with the experience were also collected. The quantitative data analysis focused on descriptive, correlational, and inferential procedures using the software SPSS (version 21, IBM® SPSS®, Chicago, IL, USA).
The two focus group sessions explored and deepened the predictors of perceived self-efficacy and their functions as modulators of well-being within the school context. The analysis of qualitative information was conducted using Atlas.ti software (version 7, ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany).
3.3. Research Context and Participants
This research was developed in the School of Education Sciences at the public University of Seville (Spain). This institution offers a four-year BA in Primary Education. During the fourth year, PSTs go to schools to do their practicum. Over two months, the PSTs spend five hours per day at school, supervising, teaching, observing, and collaborating with CTs.
The study population comprises 390 university students in their fourth year of the Primary Education BA (
N = 390). A simple random sampling for finite samples [
67] was conducted
with a 95% confidence level (
σ = 95%) and a margin of error of 4 (
e = 4). The previous equation presents:
σ (confidence estimation),
p (estimated percentage),
q (equivalent to 100, as standard number, subtracting the estimated percentage),
e (error), and
N (population size). Of the 390 PST, 258 responses were obtained (79% women, 21% men) before and after the practicum.
Researchers applied convenience sampling [
67] to select participants for two focus group sessions. The selection of this technique was based on the availability and willingness of the participants; thus, researchers invited PSTs to participate voluntarily when they collected post-practicum data at the university. Nine affirmative responses from eight women and one man were received. These PSTs participated in a focus group session three weeks before they finished their practicum. They also attended a second session after completing their internships.
Some ethical guidelines were followed to conduct the study [
68]; participants were informed about the implications of collaboration, their responsibilities if agreed upon, and the treatment of their responses. A number code to pair the pre-test and post-test responses was used to preserve their anonymity. The participants were assigned numbers in the focus groups. Hence, virtual identities were preserved, and access to the scales before and after placement was assured. Moreover, researchers went twice to university classrooms to present their responses in an online format. The preparation of this manuscript did not involve sensitive content when using human subjects. However, ethical guidelines established by the Bioethical Committee from Universidad Loyola Andalucía were followed.
3.4. Instruments
3.4.1. Scales
Three online scales were designed and validated due to the specification of the contexts. The pre-test self-efficacy scale is called
The Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale related to Teacher Competencies (I). The post-test self-efficacy scale is called
The Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale related to Teacher Competencies (II). The post-test scale related to satisfaction with one’s competence development and practicum context was called the
Satisfaction scale. The
Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale related to Teacher Competencies (I) was administered to the PSTs before they participated in practicum experiences, and the
Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale related to Teacher Competencies (II), and “
Satisfaction scale” were provided afterward (see
Appendix A).
The design of the perceived self-efficacy scales was based on competencies proposed by the European Commission [
54] and the Practicum Program for BA Primary Education, to which the PST participants belong. According to the School of Education Sciences [
69], acquiring specific competencies through the practicum contributes to PSTs’ ITPD. It is also drawn on different European teaching standards and competencies to triangulate the instruments’ content [
57,
70,
71]; similar research proposals were also considered [
32,
72].
Finally, different competencies were included in the pre-test and post-test self-efficacy scales (see
Appendix A). A post-test satisfaction scale was developed based on Durksen et al.’s proposal [
47] to understand the sources of satisfaction with one’s professional competence and the training environment. In perceived self-efficacy scales, the items are numbered from 1 to 7, with “i1–i7” as part of the pre-practicum scale and “i1P–i7P” as part of the post-test scale. In the satisfaction scale, items are numbered from 8 to 13 (i8P–i13P) (see
Appendix A).
The participants responded using five-point Likert scales ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Cronbach’s alpha was obtained to determine the reliability of the scales: the pre-test self-efficacy scale obtained an α score of 0.779, the post-test self-efficacy scale obtained α = 0.825, and the post-test satisfaction scale obtained α = 0.792. According to DeVellis [
73], a Cronbach’s alpha between 0.70 and 0.80 is a highly reliable value. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted for a first approximation for internal consistency, considering a subsequent validation in the future. Varimax rotation was selected with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and a cut-off loading of 0.55. One extracted factor in scale (I) explained 44.946% of the variance.
Table 1 presents the factorial weights.
In the post-test self-efficacy scale, two factors were found and explained 54.725% of the variance with eigenvalues greater than 1.0. As observed in the factor weights matrix (see
Table 2), the first factor was shaped through items related to professional performance competencies, and the second was shaped through items related to autonomy and personal management competencies. Commonalities present coefficients lower than 0.55.
Finally, one factor in the post-test satisfaction scale explains 51.157% of the variance (see
Table 3).
3.4.2. Focus Group Sessions
Both focus group sessions tried to identify the most significant sources of changes in perceived self-efficacies of PSTs and the factors and agents that intervene in their satisfaction with their job environment, thus identifying possible predictors of self-efficacy and sources of satisfaction within practicum contexts. The first session took 60 min; the second one took 90 min. Both sessions were conducted in university classrooms. The initial questions in both moments were based on the protocol used by Izadinia [
74] to promote reflection related to the self and the influence of the context. Researchers tried to stimulate discussions in a non-threatening way. Some examples of the questions asked are:
How would you describe your performance at the schools? What stands out about your relationships with the CTs and the children throughout the experience?The sessions were audio recorded. Although researchers structured the analysis from previously validated protocols, an inductive approach was followed to collect and analyze information. Two thematic axes were proposed, and the following subcategories arose:
Main axis: school social environment [
75,
76]:
Main axis: PSTs’ performance [
77]:
- c.
Arisen subcategory 2c: Management of teaching performance.
- d.
Arisen subcategory 2d: Highlighted attitudes.
- e.
Arisen subcategory 2e: Highlighted competencies.
3.5. Data Analysis
To obtain quantitative information, descriptive and inferential analyses and some correlations were conducted using SPSS. For qualitative information, to ensure accuracy, a content-thematic analysis was used following Miles and Huberman’s [
78] analysis sequence, using Atlas.ti: Transcriptions—Addition of notes—Memos—Identification of general categories—Several readings: first approximation to subcategories—Triangulation process to control reliability and identify bias—Codification—Categorization—Individual interpretation—Group interpretation.
4. Results
The findings are presented according to the research objectives.
4.1. Quantitative Objectives
4.1.1. Changes in Perceived Self-Efficacy
The KMO and Bartlett test was conducted to select the most suitable inferential analyses to answer the quantitative objectives. The results were KMO = 0.757,
p < 0.005. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is a nonparametric test selected to explore the existence of differences in perceived self-efficacy. Statistically significant differences (
p < 0.000) in perceived self-efficacy toward all teacher competencies were found after the practicum.
Table 4 shows the findings.
4.1.2. Relationship between Perceived Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction
Descriptive analyses of the satisfaction scale showed high satisfaction with the experience in general. However, the lowest mean score (3.0) was found for the satisfaction with USs’ role. By contrast, a high satisfaction (4.5) was found with one’s professional performance.
A Spearman’s rank-order correlation was conducted to determine the relationship between perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction. A statistically significant relationship was found in levels of self-efficacy before and after student teaching experiences (
p < 0.001). Moreover, a more robust relationship exists between perceived self-efficacy after the practicum and satisfaction with one’s capabilities (
p < 0.000).
Table 5 shows the results.
4.2. Qualitative Objectives
The analysis shows a narrative structure toward two dimensions: (1) PSTs’ performances at the school; and (2) their relationships at the schools.
Table 6 presents the categories and subcategories.
The first category of Social Environment comprises two subcategories: 1a and 1b. In subcategory 1a, the PSTs highlight changes in their perceived self-efficacy due to relationships, firstly, with children in the classroom, and secondly, with CTs, colleagues, or the school principal. However, the PSTs perceived a poor follow-up from their USs and a lack of support from their CTs on several occasions. From the PSTs’ perspective in the first focus group, loneliness and insecurity meant negative affection felt toward CTs and USs t: “I have been sad because I have to decide sometimes everything alone.... I’d like to develop teacher strategies faster.… I’m proud of what I’m achieving although my mentor is not there” (Participant 9). “I miss sharing what I observe in and out of the classroom; it’d have been interesting to receive more feedback for future improvements” (Participant 2).
In subcategory 1b, the PSTs mention that excitement was present throughout the student teaching experience. Different emotional states increased their perceived self-efficacy toward coping with uncertainty:
Some colleagues in the school invited me to share materials and resources… I was being treated as a partner, not as a student. That made me feel strong, and I started to be part of their team. That’s something really powerful when you need some proof you’re capable of being a teacher.
(Participant 7)
When I discovered how special education needs students made tremendous efforts to be in class, I understood I could not be a plant in the classroom: I forced myself to pay attention to what is important: being there for these children, no matter the time I needed to invest. If my tutor was not there enough for me, I would not repeat that model with children.
(Participant 1)
Bandura [
8] considered emotional arousal (i.e., pleasure and happiness while performing) and mastery experiences were sources of perceived self-efficacy since they helped PSTs to feel more capable, motivated, and satisfied. These sources modulated perceived self-efficacy because the PSTs needed to adapt their strategies. A modulation process from emotional arousal enabled the PSTs to control their emotions when they perceived themselves as less competent. Specifically, according to the second focus group, children who generated positive emotional responses were leading social agents:
I’m becoming a teacher thanks to children. They push me out of my comfort zone, which excites me in the mornings. The cooperating teacher gives me some advice after seeing me in the classroom; however, I expected more help. I feel alone, sad, and nervous because I don’t know how to adapt my teaching.
(Participant 5)
The second category comprised three subcategories: 2a, 2b, and 2c. In subcategory 2a, the PSTs perceived themselves as professionals facing school demands. They were confident and proactive that they had shown forcefulness to make decisions; however, they recognized during the second focus group that they acted according to limited previous knowledge: “I think I’ve been autonomous: I was able to provide what they needed, but I’m conscious that they expected to find a more prepared teacher” (Participant 6). “My digital competence is a disaster, but I planned everything really well. I used devices and apps to contribute something new” (Participant 8).
Mastery experiences and social interactions made the PSTs feel insecure but autonomous; these two mechanisms could intervene in their identities as teachers in the classroom because their emotional responses modulated their self-perceptions as professionals. In subcategories 2b and 2c, participants pointed out their resilience in dealing with “reality shocks”.
You don’t know precisely why some decisions are made before you arrive at the school, so I did not question anything. However, it made me think about my role as an educator. I will not make these decisions in the future; that’s something I learned thanks to the practicum: your teacher profile (identity) is constantly under construction (…) that made me feel satisfied with my criteria because I was testing it all the time with the students, meeting their academic demands.
(Participant 2)
Coping strategies generated a post-action reflection about the accuracy and suitability of their performance. From their perspective in the last session, the emotional dimension influenced their competence development strongly: “My tutor was more worried about curriculum and school objectives. He did not have enough time for me when he asked to address special needs, but I tried to show autonomy” (Participant 1).
“I felt comfortable when I felt the children paid attention. That helped me explain a lesson; however, if they detected any mistake in my speech, I started to feel anxious; that made me reflect less about what I was doing”.
(Participant 7)
Next,
Figure 2 outlines the connections from qualitative analyses.
5. Discussion
This study explored the predictors of perceived self-efficacy in PSTs during the practicum. It also investigated the relationship between perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction of PSTs with their competence development during the practicum and with the training environment. In this vein, we explored how changes in perceived self-efficacy and the role of satisfaction could impact PSTs’ well-being. Findings suggest the value of considering self-efficacy and satisfaction in practicum contexts for understanding PSTs’ self-perceptions from an accurate point of view regarding ITPD opportunities.
In line with Huang et al. [
79] and Yildirim [
6], this research shows how social demands from pupils and schools presented changes in perceived self-efficacy of PSTs, affecting their emotional states and job satisfaction, and it can impact the rates of teachers dropping out. Hence, these factors can influence the understanding of well-being associated with experiences in practicum contexts [
80]. From our participants’ viewpoints, they became emotionally involved in their practicum. However, some implications for their professional well-being were found, such as a sense of loneliness, abandonment, or a positive satisfaction with the classroom climate when they controlled their teaching. Based on this finding, perceived self-efficacy is a precise indicator to enquire about well-being in initial teacher education [
81]. Changes in this self-perception explain how social relationships and mastery experiences, which are expected in a professional environment, positively influenced PSTs’ feelings in general. Hence, PSTs’ satisfaction with their competence development was also positively affected.
Regarding the research’s objectives, significant differences were found in PSTs’ perceived self-efficacy after practicum experiences. Changes were present in all proposed competencies. Unlike other studies that show a decrease or no change in self-efficacy [
82], our results show a relationship between personal variables’ and contextual variables’ influences on the self-perceptions framed by the practicum. In addition, regarding satisfaction with own’s competence development, a relationship between improved perceived self-efficacy and high satisfaction with competence development leads to professional development opportunities onwards [
23,
24,
83]. Simultaneously, in line with Toropova et al. [
84], the workplace’s characteristics, such as ITPD opportunities and experienced improvements in teacher efficacy, affects their level of satisfaction with their daily jobs. Qualitative information was helpful with the quantitative data to determine predictors of perceived self-efficacy and its changes throughout the practicum experience. Aligned with González et al. [
29], a correspondence was explicitly found between changes in perceived self-efficacy and planning, decision-making, and autonomy. In addition, findings from both focus group sessions proposed external agents (i.e., children, CTs) as influential factors in PSTs’ sense of security during the practicum. It created both satisfaction with one’s actions and responses to external demands, pressure, and discomfort in their daily routines.
Concerning perceived self-efficacy sources, Bandura [
9] pointed out vicarious experiences and verbal persuasion as essential sources in learning spaces. However, our findings highlight that the PSTs did not value them, which supported Poulou’s findings [
85]. Conversely, as Tschannen-Moran and Hoy [
11] explained, the PSTs highlighted interactive mastery experiences and the impact of psychological states as primary sources of improvement in their perceived self-efficacy, thus becoming predictors of this self-perception. In addition, from PSTs’ points of view, feedback was weak since they felt alone when making decisions and dealing with unpredictable situations. At this point of the research, it is worth differentiating between verbal persuasion and feedback from CTs and USs. Qualitative information showed that PSTs used different coping strategies to overcome the lack of support, which may be due to a strong perception of their autonomy competence.
Some studies have noted the importance of developing constructive relationships between PSTs, CTs, and USs [
44,
86]. In our research, the relationships between PSTs and children are connected to the emotional states of PSTs and improved their self-perceptions. Hence, perceived self-efficacy is related to reflective processes and emotional excitement: positive emotions came from successful interactions, while negative emotions generated coping strategies (i.e., adaptation and resilience) when facing disappointments with professional advice and unsuccessful performances. These findings are supported by the research of Han et al. [
87], which points out the importance of reflection in improving self-perceptions.
Finally, changes in perceived self-efficacy relate to improving classroom management and to the belief that the practicum is an opportunity for professionalization, thus connecting it with PSTs’ satisfaction with their environment. In this vein, Kassis et al. [
88] highlight a mutual benefit between school settings and the university context to reinforce the engagement of PSTs toward teaching as a career.
In line with Yada et al. [
44], this study highlights the relevance of CTs’ support as an influential factor in improving PSTs’ well-being. A supportive environment and empathetic language are crucial elements in promoting security and self-confidence. Although PSTs showed general satisfaction, they were dissatisfied with the mentors’ roles. Previous research has demonstrated the mediation of CTs and USs in providing professional advice that positively influences the PSTs’ experience valuations [
32,
89].
6. Conclusions
Changes in perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction with the practicum influence PSTs’ well-being. This study encourages consciously investigating this type of setting to understand the role of perceived self-efficacy and job satisfaction in improving the preparation of future teachers.
To do so, studying ITPD through the practicum is an adequate research pathway considering the difficulty of exploring perceived self-efficacy in university courses, which is less experiential and more distant from the educational reality. Moreover, looking at the practicum provides a deeper insight, and helps avoid forgetting about or abandoning this period for the ITPD. These interrelationships allow us to point out the PSTs’ well-being, thus the teachers’ well-being. Therefore, searching for improvement mechanisms of perceived self-efficacy and satisfaction during initial teacher education will support PSTs when they reach future professional stages (i.e., in-service teaching). Hence, the teaching career will be more sustainable as it will not need to constantly motivate and assist teachers, and it will avoid creating stressors instead of professional development opportunities.
Another relevant conclusion from this study is the consideration of interactions with children as a powerful predictor of PSTs’ perceived self-efficacy and increased satisfaction with the practicum. On the contrary, a lack of support from CTs and USs exists; however, it did not negatively affect their perceived self-efficacy or satisfaction with the experience. The role and implication of these two mentors are also a predictor of perceived self-efficacy, although it showed the opposite effect when they provided a poor follow-up to the PSTs. An action recommended by this study is to strengthen CTs’ and USs’ training in terms of professional advice in practicum contexts.
The lack of support and attention reported by the participants also directs us to think about the workload, tiredness, and lack of time that CTs and USs face, which affects their abilities to develop their responsibilities appropriately [
90,
91]. Personal-emotional havoc could weaken professional well-being, thus causing PST burnout. This study is aligned with previous ones [
92,
93], which support the consideration of efficacy beliefs and job satisfaction when studying PSTs’ well-being to collaborate with the well-being of teachers in service. Therefore, creating sustainable working conditions will improve the well-being of future generations of teachers.
Some limitations can be found throughout this research. According to Ma et al. [
64], specific items in the design scales should be restructured to obtain a better adjustment for confirmatory validation. Additionally, the focus group sessions may offer a limited perspective based on the number of participants. Nevertheless, qualitative information was essential in this study, as previous works called for mixed methods research designs.