A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Review of the Literature
2.1. Green IT in Terms of MIS
2.2. Characteristic of Negotiation in Acquisition Transaction of MIS
3. Methodology
Characteristics of Analyzed Projects
4. Research Results
4.1. Coronavirus Impact on the Negotiation Process
4.2. Coronavirus Impact on Cloud Management Information Systems Selection
4.3. Purchase Process Differences Catalog
- In the projects considered, the acquisition transaction before the pandemic took longer than during the pandemic period. The respondents indicated that the pandemic forced them to work more efficiently as a result of recommendations from company management. The recommendation was to prepare for increased uncertainty by purchasing and installing equipment more quickly. In addition, the management of the company recognized the opportunity of improving processes related to e-commerce.
- The research on the pre-pandemic acquisition transaction confirms the observations of F. Bannister and D. Remenyi [43] that customer decision makers are guided by an “act of faith” and intuition regarding the software itself as well as the competence of the implementing company when deciding to begin implementing an information system. This is due to the fact that the conducted research indicates that customers do not make decisions based mainly on rational premises but also on emotions. Additionally, in the process of selecting IT systems supporting management, the surveyed companies often focused on the organization of the software presentation by potential suppliers and looked for the cheapest offer, not establishing beforehand sufficient functional requirements for these systems and criteria for economic evaluation of the investment.
- The acquisition of MIS in the pandemic period in the surveyed projects was more structured, and remote contacts with the client were precisely documented (i.e., recorded), which according to the respondents stimulated them to take more responsibility for the decisions made. This way, the “emotional element” in decision-making was reduced, leading to reduction in intuition in favor of rational considerations in decision-making.
- In the surveyed projects, the client in the pandemic period tried to sign a contract for the purchase of implementation services that had the characteristics of a casuistic contract. These types of agreements were intended to regulate in detail a very broad spectrum of adverse events that could occur in the implementation of the project. Casuistic contracts were intended to protect the interest of the buyer, who had no opportunity to get to know the supplier during traditional meetings. For the pre-pandemic projects surveyed, the contracts had a framework nature and were not casuistic. The respondents indicated that during the meetings in the last steps of the purchasing process they could get to know the supplier and gain trust in their competence.
- In the surveyed projects the customer in the pandemic period declares that due to the hybrid work a significant deficit of information and knowledge was identified concerning the project implementation pricing, project implementation methodology, system functionality, TCO throughout the project life cycle. The identified information and knowledge deficit creates an information gap that exists throughout the life cycle of the IT project. The deficit of information and knowledge in the above-mentioned area was greater during the pandemic than before the pandemic due to difficulties in communication during the pandemic period.
- There was a change in the structure of transaction costs observed during the purchase process in the pandemic period and before the pandemic. The transaction cost groups are shown in Table 4 in order of their significance. The respondents in the surveyed projects indicated that the main reasons for the change in the transaction cost structure are the increased efficiency of hybrid work resulting from a more structured process and IT tools used, as well as increased expenses related to the reduction in the information gap in the client’s project group aimed at developing a casuistic contract for implementation services.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- Research in the field of technology platforms designed to conduct purchasing processes. Such solutions are available on the market, e.g., SAP’s ARIBA, but further development is needed;
- Behavioral aspects occurring in sales process and contract negotiations of Green IT solution;
- Research to confirm whether Green IT really reduces energy consumption compared to other high-energy industries;
- Research into the phenomenon of information asymmetry between supplier and customer in the sales/purchasing process conducted remotely;
- Research on information gaps in customers and suppliers throughout the life cycle of a Green IT project;
- Research on the process of remote negotiation of services in the metaversum belonging to Green IT.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Characteristics of the Purchase Process from the Customer’s Perspective | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 Pre-implementation analysis phase | Duration: 2 months. Remote work (MS Teams). Definition of project objective, functional and technological requirements, definition of project group, schedule, risk management. | Duration: 1 month. Hybrid work. Definition of project objective, functional requirements (i.e., scope of reports, interface specifics), define project group, schedule, risk management. | Duration: 3 months. Working in a client’s office. Definition of project objective, functional and technological requirements, definition of project group, schedule, risk management. | Duration: 4 months. Working in a client’s office. Definition of project objective, functional and technological requirements, definition of project group, schedule, risk management. |
Step 2 Develop a list of potential suppliers. | Duration: 1 Week. Remote work (MS Teams). List of vendors interested in participating. | Duration: 1 week. Hybrid work. List of vendors interested in participating | Duration: 1 month. Working in a client’s office. List of vendors interested in participating. | Duration: 2 months. Working in a client’s office. List of suppliers interested in participating in the tender. |
Step 3 Develop bidding documents. | Duration: 3 weeks. Remote work (MS Teams). Development of forms that create a request for proposal. | Duration: 2 weeks. Remote work (Skype). Development of tender documentation. | Duration: 3 months. Working in a client’s office. Development of the forms that create a request for proposal. | Duration: 2 months. Working in a client’s office. List of suppliers interested in participating in the tender. |
Step 4 Send tender documents to potential suppliers. | Duration: 1 week. Sending electronic versions of tender documentation. | Duration: 1 week. Sending electronic versions of tender documentation. | Duration: 1 month. Sending electronic versions of tender documentation. | Duration: 2 months. Sending electronic versions of tender documentation. |
Step 5 System presentation by vendors. | Duration: 1 month. Remote presentations using MS Teams. ERP system presentation by vendors based on scenarios prepared by the client. | Duration: 3 weeks. Remote presentations using Skype. | Duration: 2 months. Presentations in the client’s office. Presentation of selected system functionalities. | Duration: 3 months. Presentations in the client’s office. Presentation of selected system functionalities according to a planned scenario. |
Step 6 Analyzing and evaluating the bids according to the established criteria. | Duration: 1 month. Remote work for the client’s project group. | Duration: 1 month. Hybrid work of the client’s project group. | Duration: 1 month. Work in a client’s office. | Duration: 1 month. Work in a client’s office. |
Step 7 Verification of reference information. | Duration: 1 month. Contact with reference clients only remotely. | Duration: 2 weeks. Hybrid work. Verification of reference information | Duration: 1 month. Work in a client’s office. Verification of reference information. | Duration: 2 months. Work in a client’s office. Verification of reference information |
Step 8 Substantive negotiations | Duration: 1 month. Remote work to organize five workshops verifying functional, technological assumptions. | Duration: 2 weeks. Remote work involving two meetings of 2–3 h each to agree on the organization of an IT project | Duration: 2 months. Work in the client’s office. Organization of four meetings defining the organization of the ERP implementation project. | Duration: 3 months. Working in the client’s office. Organization of four meetings defining the organization of the CRM system implementation project |
Step 9 Negotiation of the contract | Duration: 1 month. Remote work involving contractual agreements between vendor and client with legal input. | Duration: 2 weeks. Remote work involving contract reconciliation between supplier and recipient lawyers. | Duration: 1 month. Work in client’s office involving contractual arrangements between vendor and client with input from lawyers. | Duration: 2 months. Work in the client’s office agreeing a contract between supplier and client with legal input. |
References
- Akpan, I.J.; Aguolu, O.G.; Ezeume, I.C. Overcoming the Challenge of Communicating the Concept and Science of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 to Non-Experts. Challenge 2021, 64, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donthu, N.; Gustafsson, A. Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karpova, E.; Correia, A.-P.; Baran, E. Learn to use and use to learn: Technology in virtual collaboration experience. Internet High. Educ. 2009, 12, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wotruba, T.R. The Evolution of Personal Selling. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 1991, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellis, W.M. Application of a Case Study Methodology. Qual. Rep. 1997, 3, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Akpan, I.J.; Soopramanien, D.; Kwak, D.-H. Cutting-edge technologies for small business and innovation in the era of COVID-19 global health pandemic. J. Small Bus. Entrep. 2021, 33, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nousopoulou, E.; Kamariotou, M.; Kitsios, F. Digital Transformation Strategy in Post-COVID Era: Innovation Performance Determinants and Digital Capabilities in Driving Schools. Information 2022, 13, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ting, D.S.; Carin, L.; Dzau, V.; Wong, T.Y. Digital technology, and COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bader, K.; AlNuaimi, B.K.; Singh, S.K.; Ren, S.; Budhwar, P.; Vorobyev, D. Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 145, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayal, K.; Raut, R.D.; Yadav, V.S.; Priyadarshinee, P.; Narkhede, B.E. The impact of sustainable development strategy on sustainable supply chain firm performance in the digital transformation era. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 845–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation? Sustainability 2022, 14, 7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirel, P.; Kesidou, E.; Danisman, G.O. Digital Transformation for Green Growth: Evidence from Micro Firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings; Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor: Briarcliff Manor, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šimberová, I.; Korauš, A.; Schüller, D.; Smolíkova, L.; Straková, J.; Váchal, J. Threats and Opportunities in Digital Transformation in SMEs from the Perspective of Sustainability: A Case Study in the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenkin, T.A.; Webster, J.; McShane, L. An agenda for ‘Green’ information technology and systems research. Inf. Organ. 2011, 21, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, R.; Gani, A.; Shuja, J. Greening emerging IT technologies: Techniques and practices. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2017, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Green information technology strategic justification and evaluation. Inf. Syst. Front. 2013, 15, 831–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clifton, M. Green IT: An Analysis of Eco-Friendly Information Technology Strategies. Int. J. Green Technol. 2019, 5, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murugesan, S.; Gangadharan, G. Green IT: An Overview. In Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mines, C. 4 Reasons Why Cloud Computing is Also a Green Solution. Available online: https://www.greenbiz.com/article/4-reasons-why-cloud-computing-also-green-solution?page=0%2C0 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Kliazovich, D.; Bouvry, P.; Khan, S.U. GreenCloud: A packet-level simulator of energy-aware cloud. J. Supercomput. Vol. 2012, 62, 1263–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wachnik, B.; Chyba, Z. Key Growth Factors and Limitations of Photovoltaic Companies in Poland and the Phenomenon of Technology Entrepreneurship under Conditions of Information Asymmetry. Energies 2021, 14, 8239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanwal, K.I.; Adeel, N.; Tayyiba, R. Green Practices: A Solution for Environmental Deregulation and the Future of Energy Efficiency in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10, 878670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IaaS versus PaaS versus SaaS. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/iaas-paas-saas (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Radu, L.D. Green Cloud Computing: A Literature Survey. Symmetry 2017, 9, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alraja, M.N.; Imran, R.; Khashab, B.M.; Shah, M. Technological Innovation, Sustainable Green Practices and SMEs Sustainable Performance in Times of Crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, D.; Akman, I.; Mishra, A. Theory of Reasoned Action application for Green Information Technology acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 36, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuong, Q.H. A New Theory of Serendipity: Nature, Emergence and Mechanism; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2022; Available online: https://books.google.com/books?id=2wdsEAAAQBAJ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Brown, C.V.; Vessey, I.; Powell, A. The ERP Purchase Decision: Influential Business and IT Factors. In Proceedings of the 2000 Americas Conference on Information Systems: AMCIS 2000, Long Beach, CA, USA, 10–13 August 2000; p. 438. [Google Scholar]
- Thirumalai, S.; Sinha, K.K. Customization of the online purchase process in electronic retailing and customer satisfaction: An online field study. J. Oper. Manag. 2011, 29, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Chen, W.; Huang, K.; Liu, J.; Hsu, W.; Hsu, C. Implementation of Smart Power Management and Service System on Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing, Washington, DC, USA, 4–7 September 2012; pp. 924–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weitz, B.A.; Sujan, H.; Sujan, M. Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness. J. Mark. 1986, 50, 174–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prat, M. Sales Negotiations in Professional Service Firms, An Exploratory Study on Agenda Setting and Issue Management Wiesbaden; Springer: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Adair, W.L.; Brett, J.M. The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation. Organ. Sci. 2005, 16, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churchill, G.A.; Ford, N.M.; Walker, O.C. Sales Force Management, 8th ed.; Irwin Homewood: Chicago, IL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Gerring, J. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices; Cambrige University Press: Cambrige, UK, 2007; p. 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavaye, A. Case study research: A multifaceted research approach for IS. Inf. Syst. J. 1996, 6, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vissak, T. Recommendations for Using the Case Study Method. Qual. Rep. 2010, 15, 370–388. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed.; Sage Publishing: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Crowe, S.; Cresswell, K.; Robertson, A.; Huby, G.; Avery, A.; Sheikh, A. The case study approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2011, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Adwan, A. Case study and grounded theory: A happy marriage? An exemplary application from healthcare informatics adoption research. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 2017, 9, 294–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phondej, W.; Kittisarn, A.; Neck, P. The Seven Steps of Case Study Development: A Strategic Qualitative Research Methodology in Female Leadership Field. Retrieved. In Revista de Management Comparat International/Review of International Comparative Management; Faculty of Management Academy of Economic Studies: Bucharest, Romania, 2011; Volume 12, pp. 123–134. [Google Scholar]
- Arif, Z.U.; Rahaman, M.M.; Uddin, N. Role of Management Information Systems in Managerial Decision Making of Organizations in the Global Business World. Int. J. Res. Commer. 2012, 2, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- Remenyi, D.; Money, A.; Bannister, F. The Effective Measurement and Management of ICT Cost and Benefits; A. A., Ltd., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Jolson, M. Broadening the scope of relationship selling. J. Pers. Sell. Sales Manag. 2013, 17, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bărbulescu, O.; Tecău, A.S.; Munteanu, D.; Constantin, C.P. Innovation of Startups, the Key to Unlocking Post-Crisis Sustainable Growth in Romanian Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Sustainability 2021, 13, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuong, Q.H.; Napier, N.K. Acculturation and global mindsponge: An emerging market perspective. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 2015, 49, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Komunikat z Badań, Zaufanie Społeczne. Available online: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_043_20.PDF (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Lozano, A.J. A Historical Perspective of Casuistry, and its Application to Contemporary Biomedical Ethics. Linacre Q. 2003, 70, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Aubert, B.; Rivard, S.; Patry, M. A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leszczyński, G.; Zieliński, M. Zaufanie sprzedawcy do klienta a zachowania sprzedażowe w kontekście rynku instytucjonalnego. Organ. I Kier. 2018, 3, 97–112. [Google Scholar]
Case Study Stage Number | Stage Name |
---|---|
Stage 1 | Formulating the research aim and question |
Stage 2 | Selecting the cases to be considered |
Stage 3 | Defining case study structure |
Stage 4 | Data analysis |
Stage 5 | Confrontation with the literature |
Stage 6 | Case study conclusion and description |
Project A | Project B | Project C | Project D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics of the project | ERP system implementation in the scope of general ledger modules; accounts receivable, accounts payable, fixed assets; | CRM system implementation in the scope of operational controlling | ERP implementation in the scope of modules G/L, receivables, payables, fixed assets, sales management, purchases | CRM system implementation project in the scope of FMCG product sales. |
Sales lead time | 8 months (March–October 2020). pandemic period. | 6 months (January-June 2021). pandemic period. | 1 year (January–December 2019). Before the pandemic period. | 1 year and two months (November 2018–December 2019). Before the pandemic period |
Budget | 75,000 EUR | 45,000 EUR | 90,000 EUR | 55,000 EUR |
Step | Description |
---|---|
1 | The selection of the vendor and the ERP or CRM system is followed by the final definition of the functional and technological requirements along with the budget |
2 | Suggest a proposal for a contract for the services performed, from the provider via email |
3 | Analysis of the contract by the customer |
4 | Proposing changes to the contract for the services performed by the client and sending comments via an email |
5 | Meetings to clarify comments on the agreement with the client. Meetings are held at the client’s office |
6 | Sending by an email the final version of the contract for the services performed by the client |
7 | Signing the contract by the two involved sides at the client’s office |
Transaction Cost Structure of Acquisition Transaction before the Pandemic Period | Transaction Cost Structure of the Acquisition Transaction during the Pandemic Period |
---|---|
Costs related to the organization of the tender | Costs associated with the development and negotiation of an implementation services agreement |
Costs associated with script development, participation, and verification of sales presentations | Reducing the information gap among the client’s project group regarding system functionality, expandability of this system, TCO |
Verification of reference information. | Verification of reference information. |
Reduction in the information gap among the client’s project group concerning the functionality of the systems, the possibility of extending this system, TCO | Costs associated with the development of scenarios, participation, and verification of sales presentations |
Costs associated with the development and negotiation of the Implementation Services Agreement | Costs related to the organization of the tender |
Project management costs | Project management costs |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wachnik, B.; Krupa, A.; Santarek, K. A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159531
Wachnik B, Krupa A, Santarek K. A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland. Sustainability. 2022; 14(15):9531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159531
Chicago/Turabian StyleWachnik, Bartosz, Aleksandra Krupa, and Krzysztof Santarek. 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland" Sustainability 14, no. 15: 9531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159531
APA StyleWachnik, B., Krupa, A., & Santarek, K. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland. Sustainability, 14(15), 9531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159531