The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
- (1)
- Replacing Equation (6):with
- (2)
- Replacing the calculation formula in “Section 3.2.2. Calculation of Triangular Fuzzy Number Weighting” on page 15:with
- (3)
- Replacing the fourth paragraph of “Section 3.3. Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives in China” on page 17:where FA refers to the maximization index and FB refers to the minimization index. For example, the largest of potential total power generation (A1) is 247000TWh/y, A1 ∈ FA, and the A1 score of Solar PV is (575/247000, 2876/247000), which is (0.01, 0.03). The standardized data are shown in Table 10.withwhere FA refers to the maximization index and FB refers to the minimization index. For example, the largest potential total power generation (A1) is 247000TWh/y, A1 ∈ FA, and the A1 score of Solar PV is (1296/247000, 6480/247000), which is (0.01, 0.03). The standardized data are shown in Table 10.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Niu, D.; Zhen, H.; Yu, M.; Wang, K.; Sun, L.; Xu, X. Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives for China by Using a Hybrid FMCDM Methodology with Uncertain Information. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).