Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Development
2.1. Innovation Capabilities and Sustainable Performance
2.2. Green Process Innovation and Sustainable Performance
2.3. Innovation Capabilities and Green Product Innovation
2.4. Green Process Innovation and Green Product Innovation
2.5. Mediating Role of Green Product Innovation
2.6. Moderating Role of Digital Leadership
3. Methodology
3.1. Common Method Bias
3.2. Measurement Scale
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Assessment of Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Awan, U.; Arnold, M.G.; Gölgeci, I. Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, H.; Barua, M.K. A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 122–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Yang, Y. Analyzing the green innovation practices based on sustainability performance indicators: A Chinese manufacturing industry case. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 1181–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shabbir, M.S.; Kassim, N.M. Supply chain management drivers and sustainability of green initiatives in manufacturing enterprises: A case in Pakistan. Int. J. Entrep. 2019, 22, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Memon, N.A. Eco-friendly products extended to textile and apparel products. Pakistan Text. J. 2018, 67, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, M.; Qu, Y.; Javed, S.A.; Zafar, A.U.; Rehman, S.U. Relation of environment sustainability to CSR and green innovation: A case of Pakistani manufacturing industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, J.; Coelho, A.; Moutinho, L. Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation 2020, 92–93, 102061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Rodrigues, V.S. Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousaf, Z. Go for green: Green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: Accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 54863–54875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaq, A.; Wang, Y.; Chupradit, S.; Suksatan, W.; Shahzad, F. Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework. Technol. Soc. 2021, 66, 101656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saudi, M.H.M.; Obsatar Sinaga, G.; Zainudin, Z. The effect of green innovation in influencing sustainable performance: Moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Int. J Sup. Chain. Manag. 2019, 8, 303. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, J.; Sağsan, M. Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Qu, Y.; Zafar, A.U.; Appolloni, A. Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation? Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 4206–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forés, B.; Camisón, C. The complementary effect of internal learning capacity and absorptive capacity on performance: The mediating role of innovation capacity. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2011, 55, 56–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, H.; Khan, M.A.S.; Anwar, F.; Shahzad, F.; Adu, D.; Murad, M. Green Innovation Practices and Its Impacts on Environmental and Organizational Performance. Front. Psychol. 2021, 11, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilkenmeier, F.; Fechtelpeter, C.; Decius, J. How to foster innovation in SMEs: Evidence of the effectiveness of a project-based technology transfer approach. J. Technol. Transf. 2021, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chien, F.; Chau, K.Y.; Ady, S.U.; Zhang, Y.; Tran, Q.H.; Aldeehani, T.M. Does the combining effects of energy and consideration of financial development lead to environmental burden: Social perspective of energy finance? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 40957–40970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, M.I.; Sarfraz, M.; Qun, W.; Javaid, N. Drivers of green supply chain management. LogForum 2018, 14, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiani, M.N.; Mustafa, S.H.; Ahmad, M. Does innovation capabilities affect the new service innovation success among Pakistani cellular companies? Asia Pacific J. Innov. Entrep. 2019, 13, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, M.I.; Sarfraz, M.; Arif, A.; Azam, A. An extension of the theory of planned behavior towards brand equity and premium price. Polish J. Manag. Stud. 2018, 18, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, C.-H.; Chang, K.-H.; Chen, H.-W. Strategic Orientation, Environmental Innovation Capability, and Environmental Sustainability Performance: The Case of Taiwanese Suppliers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashrafi, A.; Zare Ravasan, A.; Trkman, P.; Afshari, S. The role of business analytics capabilities in bolstering firms’ agility and performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ajaz, A.; Shenbei, Z.; Sarfraz, M. Delineating the influence of boardroom gender diversity on corporate social responsibility, financial performance, and reputation. Logforum 2020, 16, 61–74. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, J.; Raza, S.; Nurunnabi, M.; Minai, M.S.; Bano, S. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Business Networks on Firms’ Performance Through a Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hussain, K.; He, Z.; Ahmad, N.; Iqbal, M.; Taskheer mumtaz, S.M. Green, lean, Six Sigma barriers at a glance: A case from the construction sector of Pakistan. Build. Environ. 2019, 161, 106225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, M.Z.; Arshad, D. Internal capabilities and SMEs performance: A case of textile industry in Pakistan. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsatto, J.M.L.S.; Bazani, C.L. Green innovation and environmental regulations: A systematic review of international academic works. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 63751–63768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Huo, J.; Zou, H. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Yu, H. Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehzad, K.; Xiaoxing, L.; Sarfraz, M.; Zulfiqar, M. Signifying the imperative nexus between climate change and information and communication technology development: A case from Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 30502–30517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherrafi, A.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kumar, V.; Mishra, N.; Ghobadian, A.; Elfezazi, S. Lean, green practices and process innovation: A model for green supply chain performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 206, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzma, E.; Padilha, L.S.; Sehnem, S.; Julkovski, D.J.; Roman, D.J. The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A meta-analytic study. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarfraz, M.; Ivascu, L.; Cioca, L.-I. Environmental Regulations and CO2 Mitigation for Sustainability: Panel Data Analysis (PMG, CCEMG) for BRICS Nations. Sustainability 2021, 14, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, P.A.; Johl, S.K. Nexus of Comprehensive Green Innovation, Environmental Management System-14001-2015 and Firm Performance. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Salman, M.; Lu, Z. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahid, H.M.; Waseem, R.; Khan, H.; Waseem, F.; Hasheem, M.J.; Shi, Y. Process Innovation as a Moderator Linking Sustainable Supply Chain Management with Sustainable Performance in the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hintama, A.; Maulida, M.; Bustaman, Y. The Impact of Innovation Capability on ProductInnovation Performance (Case Study of ManufacturingIndustry in Indonesia). Conf. Ser. 2021, 3, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, Y.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Wah, W.-X. Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 2018, 51, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, L.; Jie, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M. Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 146–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohsin, M.; Naseem, S.; Sarfraz, M.; Ivascu, L.; Albasher, G. COVID-19 and Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation: Modeling the Impact on Environmental Sustainability and Policies. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hang, Y.; Sarfraz, M.; Khalid, R.; Ozturk, I.; Tariq, J. Does corporate social responsibility and green product innovation boost organizational performance? a moderated mediation model of competitive advantage and green trust. Econ. Res. Istraživanja 2022, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salim, N.; Ab Rahman, M.N.; Abd Wahab, D. A systematic literature review of internal capabilities for enhancing eco-innovation performance of manufacturing firms. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 1445–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Zheng, M.; Cao, C.; Chen, X.; Ren, S.; Huang, M. The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, S.K.; Del Giudice, M.; Chierici, R.; Graziano, D. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukitaruna, R.; Sedianingsih. The Impact of Green Product Innovation and Green Process Innovation on Firm Performance. In Proceedings of the Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study, Bali, Indonesia, 10–12 January 2018; pp. 645–653. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, M.; Boadu, F.; Xie, Y. The penetration of green innovation on firm performance: Effects of absorptive capacity and managerial environmental concern. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Song, W.; Wang, G.; Ma, X. Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Yin, Q.; Pan, Y.; Cui, W.; Xin, B.; Rao, Z. Green product innovation and firm performance: Assessing the moderating effect of novelty-centered and efficiency-centered business model design. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muangmee, C.; Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Soc. Sci. 2021, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elzek, Y.; Gaafar, H.; Abdelsamie, H. The Impact of Green Innovation on Sustainability Performance in Travel Agencies and Hotels: The Moderating Role of Environmental Commitment. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Syst. 2021, 14, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
- Karabulut, T.; Hatİpoğlu, H.N. The Effects of Green Product Innovation and Green Process Innovation on Company Performance. Int. J. Commer. Financ. 2020, 6, 181–193. [Google Scholar]
- Ullah, H.; Wang, Z.; Mohsin, M.; Jiang, W.; Abbas, H. Multidimensional perspective of green financial innovation between green intellectual capital on sustainable business: The case of Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 5552–5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rathore, H.; Jakhar, S.K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Madhumitha, E. Examining the mediating role of innovative capabilities in the interplay between lean processes and sustainable performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceptureanu, S.I.; Ceptureanu, E.G.; Popescu, D.; Anca Orzan, O. Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K.; Del Giudice, M.; Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J.; Latan, H.; Sohal, A.S. Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 500–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajapathirana, R.P.J.; Hui, Y. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. J. Innov. Knowl. 2018, 3, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afum, E.; Zhang, R.; Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Sun, Z. Sustainability excellence: The interactions of lean production, internal green practices and green product innovation. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2021, 12, 1089–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adegbile, A.; Sarpong, D.; Meissner, D. Strategic Foresight for Innovation Management: A Review and Research Agenda. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2017, 14, 1750019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coroamă, V.C.; Mattern, F. Digital Rebound–Why Digitalization Will Not Redeem Us Our Environmental Sins. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on ICT Sustainability (ICT4S), Lappeenranta, Finland, 10–14 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kunkel, S.; Tyfield, D. Digitalisation, sustainable industrialisation and digital rebound–Asking the right questions for a strategic research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 82, 102295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y. Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 264, 121701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lusiani, M.; Abidin, Z.; Fitrianingsih, D.; Yusnita, E. Effect of Servant, Digital and Green Leadership toward Business Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020, 11, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihardjo, L.W.W.; Sasmoko, S.; Alamsjah, F.; Elidjen, E. Digital leadership role in developing business model innovation and customer experience orientation in industry 4.0. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 1749–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijkstra, J. Digital Leadership and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Master’s Thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Malakyan, G.P. Digital leader-followership for the digital age: A North American perspective. In Digital Leadership-A New Leadership Style for the 21st Century; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Benitez, J.; Arenas, A.; Castillo, A.; Esteves, J. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Inf. Manag. 2022, 59, 103590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas Junior, .C.J.; Fagundes Cabral, P.M.; Fagundes, A.R. Digital Transformation: The Gap between Digital Leadership and Business Performance. ISLA 2020 Proc. 2020, 20, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borah, P.S.; Iqbal, S.; Akhtar, S. Linking social media usage and SME’s sustainable performance: The role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2014, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2016; ISBN 1483377466. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2009; ISBN 1848554680. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 9781292021904. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Villarreal, B.; Kumar, V.; Molina Ruiz, P. Lean and green in the transport and logistics sector—A case study of simultaneous deployment. Prod. Plan. Control 2016, 27, 1221–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, A.; Nand, A.; Castka, P. Lean-green integration and its impact on sustainability performance: A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garza-Reyes, J.A. Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2015, 6, 226–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson, B.; Samson, D. Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2001, 5, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | Frequency (N = 299) | (%) |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 163 | 54.5 |
Female | 136 | 45.5 |
Age | ||
19–30 | 43 | 14.4 |
31–40 | 74 | 24.7 |
41–50 | 75 | 25.1 |
51–60 | 79 | 26.4 |
>60 | 28 | 9.4 |
Education | ||
Intermediate | 43 | 14.4 |
Bachelor | 101 | 33.8 |
Master | 83 | 27.8 |
MPhil/Others | 72 | 24.1 |
Marital Status | ||
Single | 102 | 34.1 |
Married | 197 | 65.9 |
Construct | Items | Loading | α | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovation Capabilities | IC_1 | 0.693 | 0.852 | 0.852 | 0.535 |
IC_2 | 0.708 | ||||
IC_3 | 0.769 | ||||
IC_4 | 0.750 | ||||
IC_5 | 0.736 | ||||
Green Process Innovation | GPCI_1 | 0.681 | 0.851 | 0.851 | 0.534 |
GPCI_2 | 0.830 | ||||
GPCI_3 | 0.697 | ||||
GPCI_4 | 0.702 | ||||
GPCI_5 | 0.736 | ||||
Green Product Innovation | GPDI_1 | 0.701 | 0.775 | 0.775 | 0.535 |
GPDI_2 | 0.712 | ||||
GPDI_3 | 0.780 | ||||
Digital Leadership | DL_1 | 0.620 | 0.888 | 0.886 | 0.567 |
DL_2 | 0.802 | ||||
DL_3 | 0.860 | ||||
DL_4 | 0.730 | ||||
DL_5 | 0.658 | ||||
DL_6 | 0.818 | ||||
Sustainable Performance | SP_1 | 0.783 | 0.869 | 0.868 | 0.570 |
SP_2 | 0.690 | ||||
SP_3 | 0.799 | ||||
SP_4 | 0.725 | ||||
SP_5 | 0.772 |
Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Digital Leadership | 0.753 | 0.238 | 0.422 | 0.205 | 0.384 |
2. Green Process Innovation | 0.240 | 0.731 | 0.636 | 0.638 | 0.685 |
3. Green Product Innovation | 0.423 | 0.636 | 0.732 | 0.684 | 0.719 |
4. Innovation Capabilities | 0.203 | 0.641 | 0.685 | 0.732 | 0.718 |
5. Sustainable Performance | 0.388 | 0.689 | 0.720 | 0.717 | 0.755 |
Constructs | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Digital Leadership | 1.398 | ||||
2. Green Process Innovation | 1.698 | 1.940 | |||
3. Green Product Innovation | 2.795 | ||||
4. Innovation Capabilities | 1.698 | 2.226 | |||
5. Sustainable Performance |
Hypothesis | Direct Relationship | Std. Beta | Std. Error | T-Values | p-Values | F-Square |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | IC → SP | 0.311 | 0.096 | 3.246 | ** | 0.152 |
H2 | GPCI → SP | 0.289 | 0.079 | 3.672 | *** | 0.150 |
H3 | IC → GPDI | 0.471 | 0.100 | 4.704 | *** | 0.282 |
H4 | GPCI → GPDI | 0.334 | 0.097 | 3.442 | ** | 0.142 |
H5 | GPDI → SP | 0.362 | 0.120 | 3.017 | ** | 0.164 |
Hypothesis | Indirect Relationships | Std. Beta | Std. Error | T-Values | p-Values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H5a | IC → GPDI → SP | 0.17 | 0.076 | 2.23 | * |
H5b | GPCI → GPDI → SP | 0.121 | 0.057 | 2.113 | * |
Hypothesis | Interaction Effects | Std. Beta | Std. Error | T Values | p Values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H6a | Interaction GPDI × DL → SP | 0.230 | 0.078 | 2.927 | ** |
Level of the Moderator | Effects | Boot SE | LLCI | ULCI | |
H6a | +1 Std Dev | 0.685 *** | 0.076 | 0.536 | 0.834 |
Mean | 0.580 *** | 0.051 | 0.478 | 0.681 | |
−1 Std Dev | 0.474 *** | 0.055 | 0.365 | 0.582 |
Latent Variables | R2 | R2Adj | Q2 |
---|---|---|---|
GPDI | 0.535 | 0.532 | 0.256 |
SP | 0.714 | 0.709 | 0.357 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sarfraz, M.; Ivascu, L.; Abdullah, M.I.; Ozturk, I.; Tariq, J. Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105945
Sarfraz M, Ivascu L, Abdullah MI, Ozturk I, Tariq J. Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):5945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105945
Chicago/Turabian StyleSarfraz, Muddassar, Larisa Ivascu, Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah, Ilknur Ozturk, and Jasim Tariq. 2022. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 5945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105945