Review Reports
- Cristina Lavareda Baixinho1,2,*,
- Óscar Ramos Ferreira1 and
- Marcelo Medeiros3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Cristiana Furtado Firmino Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This is a good study. It shows important results treated with appropriate method and instruments. Results can be adecuate to people who works in nurse field.
Author Response
Dear reviewer:
We thank you for your attention to the review of our article.
We have shaded the changes made in yellow to facilitate proofreading.
Reviewer 2 Report
The writing and structure of the manuscript is in accordance with the guidelines of the Sustainability.There are some punctuation errors throughout the text that should be revised (pag2).
The title reflects the content and problematic studied. The abstract complies with the norms of Sustainability, in terms of word limits. It is clear the objective of the study, the methodology used and the main results There are some punctuation errors throughout the text that should be revised (pag2)-identified in yellow.
Congratulacions.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer:
We thank you for your attention to the review of our article and recommendations made that we have introduced and that have helped to improve the quality of the article.
We have shaded the changes made in yellow to facilitate proofreading.
In relation to the comment:
There are some punctuation errors throughout the text that should be revised (pag2).
We corrected it.
Reviewer 3 Report
Consider putting the quotes from the participants in figures to better separate them.
The sentence that starts on line 66 needs to use semicolons to separate listed items.
Author Response
Dear reviewer:
We thank you for your attention to the review of our article and recommendations made that we have introduced and that have helped to improve the quality of the article.
We have shaded the changes made in yellow to facilitate proofreading.
In relation to comments:
- Consider putting the quotes from the participants in figures to better separate them.
The way we present the results articulating the participants' speeches with the interpretation makes it difficult to organize with figure/table with the quotes. Therefore, we decided to keep it.
-The sentence that starts on line 66 needs to use semicolons to separate listed items.
we change it.