Next Article in Journal
A Reference Framework to Combine Model-Based Design and AR to Improve Social Sustainability
Next Article in Special Issue
Funding Campus Sustainability through a Green Fee—Estimating Students’ Willingness to Pay
Previous Article in Journal
Pricing ESG Equity Ratings and Underlying Data in Listed Real Estate Securities
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Green Business and Sustainable Development School—A Case Study for an Innovative Educational Concept to Prevent Big Ideas from Failure
 
 
Article

Universities’ Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability

1
Centro de Ingeniería Económica, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
2
Department of Accounting, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain
3
ABC Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Natalia Yakovleva
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042038
Received: 30 December 2020 / Revised: 9 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 13 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoting Sustainability in Higher Education)
Higher education institutions (HEIs) have voiced growing concerns about sustainability issues since Agenda 2030 was approved, but this is not enough for societal stakeholders seeking and delivering innovation and excellence. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by all UN Member States in 2015 as a universal call to action, and pose a challenge for HEIs as for the efforts made to fulfill them and knowing how to assess their performance. However, the metric management system implemented by HEIs quickly led to rankings emerging, which compare HEIs to metrics not related to the sustainability dimensions of the 17 SDGs. The main aim of the paper is to assess the level of reporting and alignment of SDG achievements with the overall the Times Higher Education (THE) ranking score. For this purpose, our study (i) models and quantifies the impact of HEIs’ disclosure of SDG information on HEIs’ overall THE Impact Rankings score, (ii) analyzes whether the best ranked universities are indeed significantly related to different SDGs than other not-so-well-ranked ones, and (iii) models the differences in the overall score and its alignment with distinct SDGs by dimensions, subjects, and geographical regions. In order to do so, a descriptive analysis, non-parametric tests, and linear and logistic regression analyses were performed. Our results reveal that the overall ranking is related to the reporting of HEIs’ SDG achievements. Moreover, the more positive actions related to health, education, industry, responsible consumption and production, climate action, and partnerships there were, the higher the position of HEIs in the general ranking was. However, we found differences between top-ranking universities and others in geographical location, disclosed information, and impact. Thus, the best-ranked universities are more committed to transferring knowledge to industry to satisfy its needs (SDG9), support strong institutions in their countries, and promote peace and justice (SDG16). Finally, SDG9 and SDG17 are the most relevant and constant SDGs when modeling the alignment of SDGs with HEIs’ dimensions (teaching, research, citations, industry income, international outlook) and subjects (technological and social sciences and humanities). HEIs integrating SDG actions into the strategic management of universities and, consequently, reporting their SDG performance to promote sustainability and contribute to sustainable development, is advisable. View Full-Text
Keywords: geographic location; higher education; linear regression; logistic regression; metric management model; sustainable development goals; university ranking geographic location; higher education; linear regression; logistic regression; metric management model; sustainable development goals; university ranking
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

De la Poza, E.; Merello, P.; Barberá, A.; Celani, A. Universities’ Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042038

AMA Style

De la Poza E, Merello P, Barberá A, Celani A. Universities’ Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability. Sustainability. 2021; 13(4):2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042038

Chicago/Turabian Style

De la Poza, Elena, Paloma Merello, Antonio Barberá, and Alberto Celani. 2021. "Universities’ Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability" Sustainability 13, no. 4: 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042038

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop